Papua New Guinea. January About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA)

Similar documents
Progress Towards the Development of the Six Country Coral Triangle Marine Protected Area System (CTMPAS)

Protected Area Categories and Management Objectives

Monitoring for Conservation Planning and Management. Environmental Evaluators Forum EPA Headquarters, USA June 14 15, 2007

2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas

Protected Areas Resilient to Climate Change, PARCC West Africa

IBAT (Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool)

THE CORAL TRIANGLE INITIATIVE ON CORAL REEFS, FISHERIES AND FOOD SECURITY

Development of innovative tools for understanding marine biodiversity and assessing good environmental status: the progress of the EU project DEVOTES

Programme of Work on Protected Areas

MAB -- Man and the Biosphere

THE SEVILLE STRATEGY FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVES

Brussels in Brief. Natura 2000 A Safety Net for Europe s Nature

DATA MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION FOR THE CIRCUMPOLAR BIODIVERSITY MONITORING PROGRAM

Barents Euro-Arctic Council (BEAC) Working Group on Environment Swedish Chairmanship Work Programme Subgroup for Nature Protection

Overview of the status of the network of Baltic Sea marine protected areas HELCOM

THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE

Management Effectiveness Evaluation of Finland s Protected Areas Summary of the Evaluation Report and Management Actions in Response to It

Mapping standards for IUCN Red List assessments

Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs). Guidelines for their Identification, Selection and Designation

Views from Living Marine Resources Management and the Coral Triangle Project

World Data Center for Biodiversity and Ecology - ICSU WDC System. OAS/IABIN Protected Area Meeting January 23, 2007

Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat

Annex II MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

Mainstreaming Biological Diversity

Ecosystem-Based Management: Making it Work in the EU Dr. Ronán Long

Comparison of HSESAP Revisions 2 and 3

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Mediterranean-Mare Nostrum Nature and Culture Common Destiny

Dataflow national level Reporting Tool

Required and Recommended Supporting Information for IUCN Red List Assessments

Biological Diversity and Tourism: Development of Guidelines for Sustainable Tourism in Vulnerable Ecosystems

Establishing large-scale trans-boundaries MPA networks: the OSPAR example in North-East Atlantic

Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention

RESPONSE FROM GBIF TO QUESTIONS FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION

Developing the Protected Areas Master List: Challenges & Lessons Learned

Business partnership activities

SOUTH GEORGIA AND SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS MARINE PROTECTED AREAS: EXISTING PROTECTION AND PROPOSALS FOR FURTHER PROTECTION

IUCN North Africa Programme

1 Overview introducing global issues and legal tools through local case studies. 2 Importance of legal protections for natural areas

A. Title of Proposed Project Development of a Protected Areas Database for Jamaica

Top 10 Myths Concerning Ecosystem Approaches to Ocean Resource Management

Candidature of Finland to the World Heritage Committee in 2013

Quality criteria and standards for German national parks

AFRICAN BIOSPHERE RESERVES NETWORK AfriMAB

Geoparks: Creating a Vision for North America

Monitoring the Critically Endangered Bird Species (White-shouldered Ibis) in Western Siem Pang Important Bird and Biodiversity Area (IBA)

A framework for integrated wetland inventory, assessment and monitoring

Broken Arrow Public Schools AP Environmental Science Objectives Revised

National Parks and Wildlife Service

Sharing Environmental Assessment Knowledge

Chapter 20. Biodiversity Planning Law

Sediment and Dredged Material Management - Relevance and Objectives 18 September 2003

Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool

Towards a UNESCO culture and development indicators suite. Working document

Kristina Veidemane, Baltic Environmental Forum Panevezys,

ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTING MPA NETWORK WITHIN THE CORAL TRIANGLE. Kristana A. Erikson. Dr. James L. Hench, Advisor

Lower Prut Floodplain - Ecological restoration of the Lower Prut Floodplain Natural Park LIFE05 NAT/RO/000155

Keywords: GIS, natural protected areas, landforms, biodiversity, geodiversity

Introduction The basis for ICES The Convention and the Copenhagen Declaration. The ICES organization

HELCOM Data and Map Service. User Manual

Panel Remarks by Mr Mmboneni Muofhe, GEO Principal Alternate, Deputy Director General, Department of Science and Technology, South Africa

COP8 DOC 33 Information Paper English only

Different Types of Marine Protected Area

Maritime spatial planning in BSR and in Poland

Biodiversity for Business


THE DRIN RIVER BASIN

Wings Over Wetlands Project Team Meeting 8-12 March 2010 Wakkerstroom, South Africa. Abdoulaye Ndiaye Gabin AGBLONON Wetlands International Africa

POLICY Personal Academic Tutoring Policy

Draft Communication Plan 2015/16

What is GIS? Why Geography?

Longboat Dr Noeleen Smyth. Pitcairn S, W. UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot 87

Achieving Ecologically Coherent MPA Networks in Europe: Science Needs and Priorities

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION LIVING IN COASTAL AREAS. Name: Percentage of Total Population Living in Coastal Areas.

Ref.: SCBD/MPO/AF/CR/ August 2015 N O T I F I C A T I O N. Preparation for the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit 2015

HELCOM perspective on clean Baltic Sea shipping. Helsinki Commission

Ecosystem perspective on ORs & OCTs

The Marine Protected Area Inventory

Planning and management of Baltic Sea Protected Areas: guidelines and tools

Speech delivered by Geert Bourgeois, Flemish Minister for Foreign Policy and. on Monday, 22 October 2007

valuing wetlands as infrastructure: examples from Asia Lucy Emerton Environment Management Group

Tourism and Biodiversity. Achieving Common Goals Towards Sustainability

BHP Billiton Iron Ore Pilbara Expansion Strategic Environmental Asses ssment: Identifying and Prioritising Environmental Assets and Species

VIENNA RESOLUTION 4 CONSERVING AND ENHANCING FOREST BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN EUROPE

Legal background paper: Environmental Regulation of Oil Rigs in EU Waters and Potential Accidents

Resolution IX.1 Annex E. An Integrated Framework for wetland inventory, assessment and monitoring (IF-WIAM)

Ramsar COP8 DOC. 18 Information Paper English only

Call for Expressions of Interest: Contributing to the BIOPAMA Regional Observatory for Biodiversity and Protected Areas in West and Central Africa

Organisation Strategy for Denmark s Co-operation with International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN),

Making GIS work in Forest management

The current institutional and legal context for biodiversity conservation and management is characterised by the following features:

PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM SECRETARIAT FEMM BIENNIAL STOCKTAKE 2012

High-level Panel on Global Sustainability Third Meeting of the Panel Helsinki, May Meeting Report

3.1 Measuring Biodiversity

Using remote access technologies

RESERVA ECOLOGICA de GUAPIAÇU, Rio de Janeiro, BRAZIL

EBRD s Environmental & Social (E&S) Risk Management Procedures for Mortgage Lending

IVATA and IOSEA IOSA - IUCN Scientific Collaboration

Wadden Sea National Park

Replacement Migration

Transcription:

WDPA Data Status Report About this Report and the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) Map showing protected areas in the WDPA Papua New Guinea January 2015 The WDPA is the most comprehensive global dataset on terrestrial and marine protected areas, incorporating the official UN List of Protected Areas. The WDPA dataset is not necessarily a complete representation of all the protected areas which have been designated in country. The quality of the WDPA depends on the accessibility of accurate, comprehensive, up-to-date protected areas information from data holders. This report describes the current status of data in the WDPA for all sites included in the January 2015 monthly release for Papua New Guinea. The WDPA is updated each month, and the information in this factsheet may have been superseded by a more recent update. This fact sheet has been produced with support from the 10th European Development Fund through the BIOPAMA (Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management) Programme. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of UNEP-WCMC and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union nor of the ACP Secretariat. The boundaries and names shown, and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. PNG Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 1 of 5

Protected areas data in the WDPA for Papua New Guinea There are 71 protected area records stored in the WDPA for Papua New Guinea, 69 are nationallevel protected areas with 2 designated under international and regional agreements or 77% of the data have boundaries in polygon format, with the remaining 23% depicted in point format (i.e. a single latitude and longitude point for the protected area). See Figure 1. Figure 1: Ratio of points to polygons 23% 77% Polygons Points Of the 71 protected areas, 41 (58%) include a marine component. These protected areas may be either partially or completely within the marine environment. Data for protected areas designated under international conventions and agreements There are 2 protected areas in the WDPA designated under international or regional conventions or agreements. Both are Ramsar Wetlands of International Importance; See Figure 2. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Figure 2: Number of WHS, Ramsar and MAB sites WHS Ramsar MAB Data for national-level protected areas There are 69 national-level protected area records in the WDPA. IUCN Management Categories have been reported for 6 of these records. The remaining 63 are recorded as Not Reported. Figure 3: National-level protected areas by IUCN Management Category III, 1% IV, 1% VI, 6% Figure 3 shows the allocation of IUCN Management Categories across national-level protected area records in the WDPA (numbers of sites in each category are shown in Table 2 at the end of this report). NR, 91% PNG Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 2 of 5

Completeness of WDPA Data Attributes for Papua New Guinea The WDPA requires that a minimum set of information is provided with each protected area record. These data attributes are defined by the WDPA Data Standard. Table 1 shows the extent to which key attributes have been reported by data providers for all protected area records in the WDPA for Papua New Guinea. Table 1: Completeness of selected attributes Attribute Completeness IUCN Category 11% Status (designated or proposed) % Status Year 79% Governance Type 89% Management Authority 62% Link to Management Plan 1% The WDPA Data Standard can be accessed at http://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data. Data sources in the WDPA for Papua New Guinea Data in the WDPA have been obtained or validated from 2 sources for Papua New Guinea. Figure 4 shows the breakdown of when protected area records in the WDPA were last updated or validated. Figure 4: Percentage of records updated or validated by year 1% 1% Data for protected areas designated under international agreements and conventions have been sourced from the relevant convention secretariat. This includes: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Ramsar Convention Secretariat and UNESCO Man and The Biosphere Programme. Not reported 2004-2008 97% <1999 2009-2011 1999-2003 2012-2014 Data for national-level protected areas in the WDPA have been sourced from national authorities wherever possible. Information may also be supplemented by data from other agencies or organisations working in each country. As part of the update process for national data, national authorities are given the opportunity to review, validate and, where necessary, edit all existing WDPA records for their country. All updates to the WDPA by national authorities take priority over other sources and are considered to be the authoritative version. All records in the WDPA have a reported source for Papua New Guinea. National-level data in Papua New Guinea are provided by two sources: WWF New Guinea & islands (NGI) Programme and Department of Environment and Conservation; The WorldFish Center, ReefBase Project, Penang, Malaysia. PNG Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 3 of 5

Table 2: WDPA Data for Papua New Guinea (as of January 2015) Polygons Points Total Realm: terrestrial or marine Terrestrial 29 1 30 Marine (partially or completely) 26 15 41 Status: designated or proposed Designated 51 16 67 Proposed 4 0 4 Status not reported 0 0 0 International Protected Areas 1 1 2 UNESCO World Heritage Sites 0 0 0 Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar sites) 1 1 2 UNESCO Man and Biosphere Reserves 0 0 0 Regional Protected Areas 0 0 0 Baltic Sea Protected Area (HELCOM) 0 0 0 Cartagena Special Protected Area 0 0 0 Marine Protected Area (CCAMLR) 0 0 0 Marine Protected Area (OSPAR) 0 0 0 Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) 0 0 0 Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) 0 0 0 Specially Protected Area of Marine Importance (Barcelona Conv.) 0 0 0 National Protected Areas: IUCN Management Category 54 15 69 Ia: Strict Nature Reserve 0 0 0 Ib: Wilderness Area 0 0 0 II: National Park 0 0 0 III: National Monument or Feature 1 0 1 IV: Habitat/species management area 1 0 1 V: Protected Area with sustainable use 0 0 0 VI: Protected Landscape/Seascape 4 0 4 Not Reported (NR) 48 15 63 Total number of records in the WDPA for Papua New Guinea 55 16 71 PNG Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 4 of 5

WDPA Quality Indicators for Papua New Guinea The percentage of records with boundaries in polygon format The WDPA stores all records with spatial (location) data. These data can be polygons which represent the boundaries of the protected area, or a single latitude/longitude point which shows the general location of the protected area. This indicator shows the percentage of records with boundaries - the preferred spatial data. 77 0 95 The percentage of data attributes which have been reported by the data provider Each record in the WDPA has 25 fields for which data attributes are requested. This indicator shows the weighted percentage of data fields which have been reported, based on the minimum, core and complete attributes. 83 63 88 99 The percentage of records updated or validated by the data provider in the last 5 years UNEP-WCMC sets a target to update each record in the WDPA at least every five years. This indicator shows the percentage of records updated in the last 5 years (since January 2010). 3 0 91 The percentage of records where the area of the polygon is within 5% of the area reported The area (km 2 ) reported for a protected area may sometimes differ from the calculated GIS area of the boundary polygon provided, possibly indicating a discrepancy within the information submitted. This indicator shows the percentage of records where the area of the polygon is within a threshold of 5% of the area reported. The threshold allows for differences due to projections and software used for calculating the GIS area. 76 0 67 0 The range of scores for individual countries in the WDPA Country score for Papua New Guinea in January 2015 (solid circle) and 2014 (dotted circle) Overall score for the WDPA PNG Report prepared on 23/02/2015 Page 5 of 5