Wyoming Valley Levee Project Update

Similar documents
Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

Levee Certification/Accreditation Process Cameron and Hidalgo Counties

Flood Protection Structure Accreditation Task Force: Final Report

FEMA Flood Zone Designations

National Flood Insurance Program, Mitigation and the Community Rating System

Appendix F Benefit-Cost Analysis of Flood Protection Measures

Changes to Alabama Flood Maps Impacts to Flood Insurance. Presented By: Leslie A. Durham, P.E. ADECA Office of Water Resources

Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan

Norfolk Flooding Strategy Update. Presentation to Norfolk City Council March 27, 2012

5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology

COMMUNITY CERTIFICATIONS

Guidance for Flood Risk Analysis and Mapping. Changes Since Last FIRM

Overview of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and Recent Flood Mapping Efforts. Richard Zingarelli

NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM (NFIP): THE BASICS & UPDATE

SARASOTA COUNTY Dedicated to Quality Service

Town of Chatham Department of Community Development

What We Do: Wetlands, Wildlife Habitat & Flood Hazards in the Root River Watershed

Focus Areas: Program/Project Management, Repetitive Loss Properties, Flood Map Modernization, Standard Business Processes.

Changing Flood Maps: A Guide for Homeowners and Consumers

Why does Kittitas County want to form a Flood Control Zone District?

Release of EC USACE Process for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Levee System Evaluation. Frequently Asked Questions

FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012

Updated Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Zoning Ordinance Update. July 16, 2015 Policy Committee

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. Why is the City of Tucson getting new flood hazard maps? 2. Who is responsible for modernizing the maps?

6.01 FEMA National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

Kansas City s Overflow Control Program

Flood Insurance Repetitive Loss Property

2014 Delaware Ordinance Workshops and assistance. Higher Standards identified by Delaware Senate Bill 64

1. Why is Lee County getting new flood hazard maps? 3. What are the benefits of the new flood hazard maps?

Flood Insurance Guide THE INSURANCE AGENT S ROLE IN PROTECTING HOMEOWNERS

Federal Triangle Stormwater Working Group Federal Triangle Floodproofing Seminar BUILDING STRONG SM

Town of Hingham. Changes to Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Insurance Costs Frequently Asked Questions

Challenges. Estimated Damages from 100-Year Flood

Innovative Stormwater Solutions in Coastal Areas 2015 APWA Stormwater Conference

Town of Union Community Rating System News

Building Olive s Flood Resiliency

FEMA s Risk Mapping, Assessment, and Planning (Risk MAP) Fiscal Year 2011 Report to Congress March 15, Federal Emergency Management Agency

TABLE OF CONTENTS. This document was prepared by. URS Group, Inc. 200 Orchard Ridge Drive, Suite 101 Gaithersburg, MD In Association with:

2013 Water Resource Development Act (WRDA) Status Report and Update

Community RiskMAP Questionnaire

James City County and Williamsburg Open House Meeting

Saving Constituents Money on Flood Insurance Under FEMA s Community Rating System (CRS)

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

Flood Insurance Rate Maps

Appendix D Flood Damage Assessment

Insurance Questions: Clothes washers and dryers, food freezers and the food in them are covered if there is contents coverage.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY STANDARD FLOOD HAZARD DETERMINATION FORM (SFHDF)

A. Flood Management in Nevada

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

This plan forms one part of a suite of Asset Management Plans that have been developed:

The AIR Inland Flood Model for the United States In Spring 2011, heavy rainfall and snowmelt produced massive flooding along the Mississippi River,

Flood Protection in Garland Past, Present, and Future. Presented by: R. Lyle Jenkins, P.E., CFM City of Garland, Texas

Hydrologic Engineering Techniques for Regional Water Resources Planning

Why should communities invest in resiliency? What are the steps communities can take to become more resilient?

This paper provides a concise description of

And Flood Resilient Design in Austin, Texas

Methods for Determination of Safe Yield and Compensation Water from Storage Reservoirs

Flood insurance why have it? Where can I buy it?

LR 314 Working Group 5 Final Report

Division of Water Frequently asked floodplain questions

1. Why is the City of Dickinson getting new flood hazard maps?

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Miquon Creek STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT WHO WE ARE

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

rescue and relief efforts in the aftermath of flooding, (iii) repair of flood damaged public facilities and utilities, and

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

Testimony of Tom Woods President, Woods Custom Homes On Behalf of the National Association of Home Builders

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

A Presentation to the Houston Hispanic Architects and Engineers

Rockford s map update project is a joint effort with FEMA in cooperation with local associations and other state partners.

Chapter 10. The National Flood Insurance Program

The Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. Sewer Overflows In Our Community

Recent Innovations In Virginia Dam Safety & Floodplain Management Program

URBAN FLOOD AWARENESS ACT. Brian Eber, CFM IDNR Office of Water Resources

Frequently-Asked Questions about Floodplains and Flood Insurance FLOOD INSURANCE

LOS ANGELES COUNTY S FLOODING HISTORY:

Business Plan Summary

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and Preliminary Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for New York City

STATE OF INDIANA AMENDMENT #4 TO ACTION PLAN FOR CDBG SUPPLEMENTAL DISASTER RECOVERY FUNDS (Method of Distribution Section Only)

Flood Emergency Response Planning: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster RIC005

NAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM

Flood Maps are Changing

Floodplain Management Today

Harris County Flood Control District. Policy, Criteria, and Procedure Manual

The City of Ottawa Flood Hazards

CASE STUDY. City of Grand Rapids Stormwater Asset Management Program. City of Grand Rapids. By the Numbers

USACE Civil Works Infrastructure Investment Trends: Glide-Path to Benign Neglect?

How to Read a Flood Insurance Rate Map Tutorial. Developed September 2000 Updated June 2003

NAFSMA Position on Floodplain Management Issues

Greater New Orleans Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System

Flood Protection Tips

FLOOD INFORMATION SERVICE EXPLANATORY NOTES

Flood Mitigation in the NYC West-of-Hudson Watershed A guide to Programs, Agencies and Funding Sources for Municipalities and Property Owners

CDM. City of Jacksonville Master Stormwater Management Plan (MSMP) Update. December 2008 Update. Agenda. 1. Data Collection. 2.

Certified Floodplain Management and Land Development Design and Entitlement

CHICKASAW COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AND INCORPORATED AREAS

The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

Transcription:

Wyoming Valley Levee Project Update July 2014

2 Harvey Johnson, P.E. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District Chief of the Civil Works Branch

3 Overview Authorized to provide flood protection to the area protected by the existing projects from flood conditions, which would occur as a result of the recurrence of tropical storms such as Agnes of 1972. Three levee systems comprised of: 16 miles of levee and floodwalls 13 storm water pumping stations 20 closure structures. $1.6 million dollars worth of rehabilitation work has been completed at 100% Federal expense as a result of Tropical Storm Lee (September 2011).

Levee Benefits and Performance Prevented over $7.5 billion in flood damages, since 1968. Performed well during Tropical Storm Lee. Contains the flow from the 1 percent annual chance flood. Continues to significantly reduce the risk of flood damages.

7 What s Changed? Climate Watershed River Science Frequency and severity of storms have increased Land cover changes (i.e. paving, deforestation) More run-off since rainfall is not absorbed into ground Sedimentation Vegetation (i.e. trees) Structures (i.e. bridges and levees) Advanced Computer Modeling of the River Longer Stream Gauge Record Risk-Based Analysis

How has the risk of flooding changed? 4 of the 8 highest storm events have occurred during the past 20 years Levee Raising Begins, 1997 26 Years of Low Storm Activity 21 Years of Low Storm Activity

Alfred Corning Binghamton Athens Plymouth Wilkes-Barre

10 What are the impacts? Because of these changes the Plymouth Borough and Wilkes-Barre/Hanover Township levee systems lack the required amount of freeboard, which is additional height added to a levee to provide a required safety factor. This prevents the Corps of Engineers from evaluating that the two levee systems meet FEMA and Corps of Engineers levee accreditation requirements. This means a potential change to the area s zone This means a potential change to the area s zone designation on the flood insurance rate maps (FIRMs).

11 Levee Performance: Public Safety & Freeboard Non Flood Event Water Surface Elevation = Water Level ** Simulation Not To Scale ** = Existing Levee

12 Levee Performance: Public Safety & Freeboard 1990 1% Annual Chance Flood - 254,000 cfs Minimum required freeboard Water Surface Elevation = Water Level ** Simulation Not To Scale ** = Existing Levee

13 Levee Performance: Public Safety & Freeboard Insufficient freeboard, but can still contain1% annual chance flood. 2013 1% Annual Chance Flood 293,000 cfs Minimum required freeboard Water Surface Elevation = Water Level ** Simulation Not To Scale ** = Existing Levee

14 Levee System Evaluation Report Results Kingston to Exeter: Meets requirements for levee accreditation. Wilkes-Barre/Hanover Twp and Plymouth Borough: Meets all levee accreditation requirements, except for minimum freeboard (required safety factor). All structural, mechanical, and electrical components of the system are well maintained and in good operational order. Levee will continue to reduce damages from flooding. Note: Of the 1,400 levee systems the Corps of Engineers oversees across the nation: 70 are accredited by FEMA 150 are provisionally accredited by FEMA 1,189 are not yet accredited by FEMA

16 Gene Gruber, P.E. FEMA, Region III Mitigation Division Director

17 Levee Status Freeboard deficient The two levee systems cannot be accredited and displayed as protecting on the next flood map Neither agencies safety factor was able to be met for the 2 of the 3 levee systems during the Corps evaluation of the Wyoming Valley Levee Project. Does not affect the current flood map Current map shows the levee as protecting Will affect the next flood map Can t be determined until the engineering studies are conducted Unsure when the next flood map will be developed Will take at least two years from the start of the project Adoption of flood map is based on legally required timelines

18 Current Flood Map Status Effective in November of 2012 Not affected by recent findings, shows the levee as protecting Areas of Concern Wilkes-Barre/Hanover Township Protected to 1% Chance Flood Insufficient Freeboard (safety factor) Plymouth Borough Protected to 1% Chance Flood Insufficient Freeboard (safety factor)

19 Levee Analysis and Mapping Procedure (LAMP) What is it? It is the new process used by FEMA to analyze and map areas landward of non-accredited levee systems on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) Previously levees were displayed as accredited and protecting, or non-accredited and providing no protection FEMA recognizes that levee systems that can t be accredited may still provide flood risk reduction This may impact future flood Mapping LAMP will need to be conducted in partnership with stakeholders Stakeholder engagement is a key for review of mapping results Timeline for LAMP - Begin in fiscal year 2015, Finish i in fiscal year 2016 Timeline for new FIRMs Preliminary in fiscal year 2017, Effective in fiscal year 2018

20 The LAMP Process Form a Local Levee Partnership Team (LLPT) to interact with the community and stakeholders. Team provides input to reflect the community s unique circumstances to better characterize local flood hazards FEMA implements analysis and mapping procedures Based on Team input Includes four separate types of analysis Funding for this effort will be budgeted for fiscal year 2015

21 Potential LAMP Outcomes Zone D D zones show areas of possible, but undetermined, flooding Not yet analyzed to determine flooding risks Not considered d a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) No federal mandate to purchase flood insurance No federal minimum floodplain requirements Special Flood Hazard Area (Zone A, AE) High risk flood area with a mandatory flood insurance requirement Federal minimum floodplain requirements apply

22 Flood Insurance Outcomes No change until a new flood map pgoes into effect Lenders can always require flood insurance, even if there s no federal mandate Unknown affect on individual properties until LAMP outcome is determined and/or a new map goes into effect Consult your flood insurance agent

23 Opportunities and Actions Community can consider Community Rating System (CRS) Voluntary steps to better protect residents Also reduces flood insurance premiums by percentages up to 45% discount Hazard Mitigation Assistance (HMA) Programs Funded by FEMA, through the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA). Competitive 75% Federal Funding Available with 25% non-federal match Application made through local municipal government. There may be other funding sources available as well Pennsylvania Silver Jackets focus on support to flood prone communities

24 Future Activities Engage in the LAMP process Calculate the potential level of protection provided by the levee through LAMP Meet with commonwealth and local officials and levee owners regarding levee and level of protection afforded Issue New Flood Map Timeframe to be determined Includes meeting with the community to rollout the maps and receive feedback and input Includes legally required comment and appeals periods

25 Levee Safety Tips PREPARE YOUR FAMILY Get an Emergency Supply Kit Make a Family Plan Contact Point School, daycare, place of employment Purchase Flood Insurance Stay Informed Prepare your home Prepare your business www.ready.gov/america/beinformed/floods.htm yg / /

26 Chris Belleman Luzerne County Flood Protection Authority Executive Director

27 Flood Authority s Responsibilities Maintain three separate levee systems, consisting i of: 16 miles of levee and floodwalls 13 stormwater pump stations 39 pumps(5k p gpmto 75k gpm) 20 closure structures 130 relief wells

28 Levee System Evaluation Report With the assumption of the O&M responsibility, the LCFPA has performed in an exemplary fashion and is diligent in the operation of the system, and proactive in its maintenance role. Repeated experiences with high water events, including the most recent major flooding event resulting from Tropical Storm Lee in September 2011, has demonstrated that the LCFPA staff are prepared to respond to a flood emergency, have the experience to effectively respond in a dynamic situation and have the resources to sustain a high tempo of flood fighting. The LCFPA maintenance staff continue to show an intimate knowledge of the Levee Systems with a detailed understanding of the workings of the functional components such as; pumping stations, closure structures, gates, valves, electrical distribution systems, SCADA systems and emergency protocols.

Questions 29