Cherokee National Forest Watauga Ranger District

Similar documents
COMPARTMENT REVIEW RECORD OF CHANGES AND DECISIONS. Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Atlanta Management Unit Year-of-Entry

Photo courtesy of the National Wild Turkey Federation NON-GAME GAME

FactSheet. Extension. Harvesting and Reproduction Methods for Ohio Forests. Nearly eight million acres of Ohio are forested. These forests F-47-01

THE OFFERING MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

File Code: Date: June 24, 2013 Subject: Mulberry River Watershed Improvement and Access Project

Assume you have 40 acres of forestland that was

Wildlifer 2013 Managing Wildlife on Private Lands

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

Habitat Management Techniques Flatwoods Salamander. USFWS Recommendations

Division of Forestry

Wausau and Marathon County Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Department Forestry Division 2015 Work Plan

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

Heartwood Forestland Fund IV, LP Highlands Property Executive Summary of the 10-Year Management Plan The Forestland Group, LLC

304 CMR: DIVISION OF FORESTS AND PARKS

Land and Resource Management Plan Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests

APPLICATION FOR CLASSIFICATION OF FOREST LAND

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

Managing Fire Dependent Wildlife Habitat without Fire. A Land Management Practice That: 100 Years of Fire Suppression in Ponderosa pine ecosystems

Forest Management Guidelines for the Protection of Four-toed and Spotted Salamander Populations Carol Hall & Bruce Carlson May 2004

Laws and Regulatory Requirements to Consider Before You Build a Pond

Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Partnership Proposed Demonstration Area A Brief Introduction. Presented by Jeremy Drew Project Manager Resource Concepts, Inc.

FWRC. Cooperators: Delta Wildlife, Inc. Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

PART I DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STATE OF HAWAII Class Specifications for the

Collaborative Partnerships and Landscape-Scale Fire Restoration on the Bayou Ranger District in the Interior Highlands of Arkansas, USA

Chapter 5. Managing Regenerating and Young Forest Habitat


HFQLG Project Evaluation Form

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

Maine Forest Service Interpretations of the Maine Forest Practices Act Statute and Rules (12 MRSA 8867-A to 8888 & MFS Rules Chapter 20)

Deer Exclusion Effects on Understory Development Following Partial Cutting in a Pennsylvania Oak Stand

Protecting Your Forest Asset

September 25, Dear Concerned Citizen:

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

4.0 Discuss some effects of disturbances on the forest.

Integrated Weed Management in Portland Parks

The LAndscape Management Policy Simulator (LAMPS) Pete Bettinger Department of Forest Resources Oregon State University

Wildlife Management Notes

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION. Background

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Biomass Harvest Guidelines

WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT 1

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HABITAT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM HABITAT ENHANCEMENT AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT FUNDING

Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact

Fire, Forest History, and Ecological Restoration of Ponderosa Pine Forests at Mount Rushmore, South Dakota

Managing Black Walnut

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HABITAT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM HABITAT ENHANCEMENT AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL PROJECT INFORMATION

Forester - Forestry Department An Equal Opportunity Employer

A Landowner s Guide to Forestry in South Carolina

Appendix A: Contractor Survey

Experienced Planning and Design

Consulting Foresters for Private Landowners

THE MIGRANT APPALACHIAN YELLOW-BELLIED SAPSUCKER SIGHTINGS ON THE TELLICO DISTRICT, CHEROKEE NATIONAL FOREST, WITH A 1995 NESTING RECORD

HURRICANE IVAN Damage Appraisal & Recovery Efforts. Presentation produced by AFC (Walter E. Cartwright) WEB Address:

Timberland Property Tax in Texas. Yanshu Li Texas Forest Service

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Using Aerial Photography to Measure Habitat Changes. Method

Benton MacKaye Trail - Section 2. Three Forks (FS 58) to GA. Highway miles

Marchand Provincial Park. Draft Management Plan

MAINTAINING BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Florida Division of Forestry

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

Fayette County Appraisal District

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

A Century of Forestry A T B EREA C OLLEGE BY JOHN PERRY

Web of Water. Teacher s Guide Webisode 1 Blue Ridge

Restoration of Fire-adapted Ecosystems in the Central and Southern Appalachians

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

What is the Dirt Worth?

Upper Deschutes Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement

Timber Mart-South CUT & LOAD CONTRACT RATES. US$ per Ton. Harvest Type LO HI AVG Harvest Type LO HI AVG HAULING RATES

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Chapter 11 C. Case Study: Massachusetts Woodlands Cooperative: A New Tool for Landscape Planning and Management

Natural Regeneration of Southern Pines

Forest-Related Job Announcements (listed alphabetically by job title)

Javier: Apologies for not having responded sooner but things have been pretty busy!

Middleville State Game Area Master Plan

High Conservation Value Forests 3.1. Old Growth Forests. Management & Monitoring Framework

6. NATURAL AREAS FIRE MANAGEMENT

The UK Timber Resource and Future Supply Chain. Ben Ditchburn Forest Research

Forest Management Plan Templates

Rural Residential Buildable Lands Inventory

GREEN RIDGE STATE FOREST Headquarters Drive, NE; Flintstone, MD TTY users call via Maryland Relay

The Resilience of Nature. Mount St. Helens Eruption and Recovery

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

Town of Richmond Hill Community Stewardship Program

4. Priority Areas of Conservation

, ~ The ResourcesAgency. Dave McNamara

Iowa Department of Transportation Concurrent NEPA / 404 Process

Summary of Pre- and Post-Project Vegetation Survey Results

2009 JULY TIMBER SALES

Indicate on the envelope containing your bid the following information: Bid on Forest Products, Harbison

Units of Measure and Conversion Factors for Forest Products

GROWER ADVISORY Agriculture Regulations of the Wetlands Protection Act

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

Decision Memo. Restore Act Land Acquisition

Integration of Forestry & Wildlife Management

Myre-Big Island State Park

Transcription:

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Cherokee National Forest Watauga Ranger District 4400 Unicoi Drive Unicoi, TN 37692 File Code: 1950 Date: March 11, 2013 The Cherokee National Forest is proposing the Paint Creek Project to work toward the desired conditions for the project area, as directed in the Cherokee National Forest s Revised Land and Resource Management Plan (RLRMP). We request your comments on the proposed action in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. The RLRMP identifies goals and objectives to be implemented under various management prescriptions. The approximately 16,136 acres of National Forest System lands in the Paint Creek analysis area are distributed among seven management prescriptions, with approximately 1,126 acres unclassified to a management prescription (Table 1). Table 1: Prescription Areas in the Paint Creek analysis area Prescription Description Acres* 4.A Appalachian Trail Corridor 2,327 7.B Scenic Corridor/Sensitive Viewsheds 2,608 7.D Concentrated Recreation Zone 48 7.E.2 Dispersed Recreation Areas-Suitable 2,333 8.C Black Bear Habitat Management 6,155 9.F Rare Communities 105 12.A Remote Backcountry Recreation-Few Open Roads 1,434 UNC Unclassified 1,126 Total Acres 16,136 * Acres reported in all tables are approximate Per the RLRMP, three of the above prescriptions 7.B, 7.E.2, and 8.C are suitable for timber management. Combined, these prescriptions total approximately 11,096 acres, of which 7,204 acres are in Land Class Codes suitable for timber production (Table 2). The remaining prescriptions, including the unclassified lands, are considered not suitable for timber management. Prescription Table 2: Acres by Suitable Prescription ESH Objective in RLRMP Total Acres Suitable Acres* Acres Treated Percent of Prescription 7.B None 2,608 1,102 30 2% 7.E.2 4% - 10% 2,333 896 0 0% 8.C 4% - 8% 6,155 5,206 347 7% Totals 11,096 7,204 377 5% * Total acres of stands within the prescription having a suitable land class. 1

Proposed Action 1. Provide early successional habitat Approximately 377 acres of early successional habitat (ESH) would be created (via the shelterwood method) for wildlife in the Paint Creek Project area utilizing commercial timber harvest. All but one of the 17 stands proposed for ESH creation are in the 8. C prescription, which has an ESH objective in the RLRMP of between 4% to 8%. Approximately 30 acres of stand 4 in compartment 217 (stand totals 40 acres) is in the 7.B prescription, which has no ESH objective in the RLRMP. The remaining 10 acres of stand 4 is found in 8.C. Also note that gaps up to two-acres in size would be created for ESH in compartment 214, stands 13 and 20 and compartment 215, stands 22, 28, 47, and 53 (Table 3). The remaining portions of these stands would be thinned (also see Table 6). The 377 total acres of ESH equals 5% of all the suitable acreage in the Paint Creek project area (Table 2). Table 3: Early Successional Habitat Compartment Stand Age Acres Forest Type 214 13 111 4 60: Chestnut oak scarlet oak 214 15 111 32 45: Chestnut oak scarlet oak yellow pine 214 20 111 3 60: Chestnut oak scarlet oak 214 26 111 15 60: Chestnut oak scarlet oak 215 22 100 5 9: White pine cove hardwood 215 28 83 10 56: Yellow poplar white oak northern red oak 215 46 100 40 41: Cove hardwood white pine hemlock 215 47 112 3 53: White oak northern red oak hickory 215 53 83 4 56: Yellow poplar white oak northern red oak 216 2 96 40 60: Chestnut oak scarlet oak 216 25 95 29 41: Cove hardwood white pine hemlock 216 29 96 13 56: Yellow poplar white oak northern red oak 217 4 101 40 53: White oak northern red oak hickory 217 10 97 23 10: White pine upland hardwood 217 31 110 40 42: Upland hardwood white pine 217 36 93 36 41: Cove hardwood white pine hemlock 218 10 104 40 56: Yellow poplar white oak northern red oak Total acres 377 All stands in Table 3 would require pre- and post-harvest site preparation and release treatments: Pre-harvest site preparation: Prior to harvest, midstory species would be controlled with an herbicide (Imazapyr and Glyphosate) to reduce post-harvest sprouting of overly-competitive species. Mast tree seedling plantings: Seedlings of mast-producing tree species would be planted, where needed in regenerated areas to augment natural reproduction. Post-harvest treatments: One-two years after harvest, use mechanical (e.g. chainsaw slashdown) or herbicide treatments (Imazapyr and Glyphosate), and two-four years after

harvest, use herbicide treatments (Triclopyr) to reduce overly-competitive sprouts. At about age 10, use chainsaws to provide for release of mast-producing trees. 2. Crop Tree Use mechanical treatment methods (e.g. chainsaw) on approximately 674 acres (32 stands) to select and provide for the release of mast-producing trees (Table 4). Note: stand 39 in compartment 217 was split out from stand 4. The remaining portion of stand 4 would be treated to create ESH (see Table 3). Table 4: Crop Tree Compartment Stand Acres Compartment Stand Acres 205 46 18 217 1 13 206 33 13 217 2 16 209 35 27 217 13 21 210 16 16 217 20 28 210 17 22 217 39 17 213 20 21 218 6 32 214 32 12 219 49 13 215 11 27 219 50 16 215 21 14 223 1 5 215 23 26 223 14 13 215 40 14 223 25 25 215 45 18 262 4 42 215 54 35 262 26 20 216 11 27 262 31 44 216 16 28 264 15 20 216 27 16 Total acres 674 216 40 15 3. Midstory The stocking density of the understory and midstory on 95 acres (two stands; Table 5) would be reduced by about 25 percent using herbicides (Imazapyr and Glyphosate). 4. Thinning Table 5: Midstory Compartment Stand Acres 217 17 47 217 33 48 Total acres 95 Thin approximately 152 acres (eight stands) to a basal area of 40 square feet per acre (Table 6). In compartment 214, stands 13 and 20 and compartment 215, stands 22, 28, 47, and 53, gaps up to two-acres in size would be created to provide ESH, with the remaining portions of the stands to be

commercially thinned (see Table 3 for ESH). Two stands Compartment 262, Stands 14 and 30 would be thinned noncommercially. Table 6: Thinning Compartment Stand Acres 214 13 19 214 20 17 215 22 20 215 28 41 215 47 12 215 53 16 262 14 10 262 30 17 Total acres 152 All stands in Table 6 would require pre- and post-harvest site preparation and release treatments: Pre-harvest site preparation: Prior to harvest, midstory species would be controlled with an herbicide (Imazapyr and Glyphosate) to reduce post-harvest sprouting of overly-competitive species. Post-harvest treatments: One-two years after harvest, use mechanical (e.g. chainsaw slashdown) or herbicide treatments (Imazapyr and Glyphosate), and two-four years after harvest, use herbicide treatments (Triclopyr) to reduce overly-competitive sprouts. At about age 10, use chainsaws to provide for release of mast-producing trees. 5. Maintain existing and create temporary roads Approximately 11.4 miles of existing road would be maintained, and 0.3 miles of temporary road would be constructed in support of timber sale activities (Table 7). The temporary road would be closed after the timber sale. Approximately 0.1 miles of Hurricane Gap Road (FR 31) would be reconstructed to repair damage from a landslide that removed part of the road. Table 7: Maintained and Temporary Roads Road # Road Name Miles Action 22171 North Rough Branch 1.3 Pre-haul Maintenance 31 Hurricane Gap 5.5 Pre-haul Maintenance 31B Little Paint Creek 0.7 Pre-haul Maintenance 3214 Ricker Mountain 2.0 Pre-haul Maintenance 422B1 New Bellcow Mountain 0.5 Pre-haul Maintenance OR-14 North Courtland 1.4 Pre-haul Maintenance Total Miles 11.4 31 Hurricane Gap 0.1 Road Reconstruction Temporary Road in C215/S47 0.3 Temporary Construction

6. Prescribed Burn Conduct low-intensity burns on approximately 1,955 acres in four burn blocks (Table 8). Fire control lines would include existing roads, streams, constructed dozer lines and hand lines. Individual burn blocks may be reburned on a two to ten-year rotation. 7. Improve Wildlife Habitat Table 8: Prescribed Burns Burn Name Acres Brushy Branch 170 Devil s Kitchen 478 Ricker Mountain 87 Upper Paint Creek 1,220 Total acres 1,955 The following actions are proposed to improve habitat conditions for terrestrial wildlife (Table 9): Boxes place bat roost boxes and bird/small mammal nest boxes. Water construct waterholes, vernal ponds, or wetland (~ 1/8 th acre) Logs provide ruffed grouse drumming logs Table 9: Terrestrial Wildlife Activities Location Boxes (each) Water (feature) Logs (each) Compartment 214 4 1 10 Compartment 215 12 1 30 Compartment 216 6 0 15 Compartment 217 10 2 25 Compartment 218 2 1 5 Totals 34 5 85 In addition, noncommercially thin approximately two acres of white pine and hardwood trees and reduce the density of rhododendron at Allen Gap Pond (Compartment 210, Stands 23 and 25) to reduce shading effects and improve wetland habitat for rare species. 8. Decommission Approximately 2.32 miles of authorized roads and 1.39 miles of unauthorized roads would be decommissioned, per the recommendations provided in the Paint Creek Transportation Analysis Plan (TAP) (Table 10).

9. Roads to be authorized Table 10: Roads to be Decommissioned Road # Miles Road # Miles 41P 0.26 OR-7 0.15 422 1.68 OR-8 0.10 422B 0.38 OR-9 0.13 5112 0.50 OR-10 0.06 OR-2* 0.01 OR-11 0.07 OR-3 0.02 OR-22 0.15 OR-4 0.07 OR-6 0.13 Total miles 3.71 * OR = Old Road Approximately 8.3 miles of roads would be authorized, per the recommendations provided in the Paint Creek TAP (Table 11). Responding to Scoping Table 11: Roads to be Authorized Road # Road Name Miles OR-13 Band Mill Road 0.45 OR-14 North Courtland 1.40 OR-15 Courtland East 0.43 OR-16 Brushy Ridge 1.05 OR-17 Grassy Branch 0.97 OR-18 East Grassy Ridge 1.65 OR-19 West Grassy Ridge 0.78 OR-20 Paint Mountain East 1.37 OR-21 Courtland Place Loop 0.11 OR-23 Dillard Place 0.10 Total miles 8.31 Responses, including names and addresses, received will be used in the Environmental Analysis process, and will be considered part of the public record for the Stoney Creek Project. Comments must be postmarked or received within 30 days beginning the day after publication of the legal notice in the Greeneville Sun. Written comments should be sent to: Terry Bowerman Cherokee National Forest Unaka Ranger District 4900 Asheville Hwy Greeneville, TN 37743 Office: (423) 638-4109 FAX: (423) 638-6599

Oral or hand-delivered comments must be received within our normal business hours of 8:00 am to 4:30 pm. Comments may also be mailed electronically to: comments-southern-cherokeenolichucky-unaka@fs.fed.us. Please identify Paint Creek Project in the subject line. Additional information may be obtained from Jeff Chynoweth at Cherokee National Forest, Unaka Ranger District, 4900 Asheville Hwy, Greeneville, TN 37743 or by phone: (423) 638-4109 or Fax: (423) 638-6599. All comments will be available for public inspection. /S/ Terry S. Bowerman Terry Bowerman Unaka District Ranger Attachments (3): Paint Creek Project: Crop Tree Treatment Map Paint Creek Project: Midstory, Shelterwood, and Thinning Treatments Map Paint Creek Project: Prescribed Burn Map

Paint Creek Project: Crop Tree Treatment Map 46 33 206 205 209 35 Legend Paint Creek WSA 15 264 0 0.5 1 Miles PC_Comps CropTree 214 213 26 4 210 16 17 31 262 213 DISCLAIMER The Forest Service uses the most current and complete data available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from sources of differing accuracy, accurate only at certain scales, based on modeling or interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc. Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created, may yield inaccurate or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update, modify, or replace GIS products without notification. 209 264 205 210 50 49 1 219 214 2 1 39 32 26 20 4 31 16 17 262 6 217 13 213 223 14 218 20 40 215 45 25 23 54 11 216 40 27 21 11 16

Paint Creek Project: Midstory, Shelterwood and Thinning Treatments Map 210 209 264 20 15 219 26 214 13 262 30 14 4 10 217 17 2 213 218 33 31 36 29 28 10 215 46 22 53 0 0.25 0.5 Miles 216 25 47 Legend Paint Creek WSA PC_Comps Midstory Shelterwood Thin noncommercial Thin with gaps DISCLAIMER The Forest Service uses the most current and complete data available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from sources of differing accuracy, accurate only at certain scales, based on modeling or interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc. Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created, may yield inaccurate or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update, modify, or replace GIS products without notification.

Paint Creek Project: Prescribed Burn Map 206 Upper Paint Crk Burn 205 209 Legend Paint Creek WSA 264 Devil's Kitchen Burn PC_Comps Upper Paint Crk burn Ricker Mtn burn 262 210 0 0.5 1 Miles Devils Kitchen burn Brushy Branch burn 209 264 205 219 210 Brushy Branch Burn 214 Ricker Mountain Burn 262 0 0.5 1 Miles 217 216 215 DISCLAIMER The Forest Service uses the most current and complete data available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from sources 213 of differing accuracy, accurate only at certain scales, based on modeling or interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc. Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created, may yield inaccurate or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update, modify, or replace GIS products without notification.