Water Quality Risk Assessment Template

Similar documents
APPENDIX 4. Risk Tables

LIQUID WASTE TREATMENT FACILITY MENDIS ROAD, HUDSON CREEK DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR A PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT


Environmental guidelines for preparation of an Environment Management Plan

Bioremediation. Introduction

Scheduling Maintenance for Infiltration Basins and Trenches

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Waste Handling & Disposal

Low Impact Development Checklist

Spill Prevention, Control & Cleanup SC-11

Pervious Pavers. By: Rich Lahren. Hebron Brick & Block Supply

Outlet stabilization structure

A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development

Maintaining water sensitive urban design elements

Storm Water Runoff. Managing. A Self-Assessment Guide for Wisconsin Businesses. Storm water runoff is coming. This guide provides businesses

Stormwater Ponds. c ıty of a bı le ne st or m wat e r utı lıty dıv ısı on

a guide for wastewater producers and wastewater treatment plant operators

SUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

Comments on: Middlesex School East Fields Athletics Drainage Calculations Samiotes Consultants, Inc., 16 November 2004

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS REGISTER (ISO 14001)

WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM WATER ACT APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE

Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk

Vehicle Tracking Control (VTC)

Pollution Control NEW! NEW! Stormwater Attenuation Systems Sustainable Urban Drainage Solutions for Domestic & Commercial Applications. klargester.

DRAINAGE DISCHARGE AGREEMENTS A WAY OF MANAGING RISK Mr. Sam Green Goulburn-Murray Water

Outdoor Storage of Raw Materials SC-33

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

Designed and produced by geo-graphicsdesign.com DP 300 3/02

Environmental Guidelines for Preparation of an Environmental Management Plan

A Geospatial Solution for Minimizing Risk. Pipeline Hazard Categorization

London Borough of Waltham Forest LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. Summary Document

Maine Department of Environmental Protection Program Guidance On Combined Sewer Overflow Facility Plans

Sustainable Resource Management Ltd

SECTION 104 PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND ABATEMENT OF EROSION AND WATER POLLUTION

Identifying Environmental Aspects

SoCo: European Overview on soil degradation processes related to agriculture

Low Impact Development

Good? Bad? Why? Training Module 4

APPLICATION PROCESS FOR LAND DISTURBING PERMIT

City of Paso Robles Community Development Department Construction Site Storm Water Quality Requirements

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

Walk around and identify the area to be assessed and look at what could reasonably be expected to cause harm.

CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES

ANNEX 2 Emergency / Pollution Incident Response Plan

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection - Wetlands Program Checklist for Stormwater Report

Origins and causes of river basin sediment degradation and available remediation and mitigation options. Feedback from the Riskbase workshop

Defence College of Technical Training. Former RAF Lyneham Geo-Environmental Report Appendix D: Preliminary Qualitative Risk Assessment

1. Purpose and scope. 2. SEPA's role in hydropower and planning

Total Suspended Solids: The Hows & Whys of Controlling Runoff Pollution

Phosphorus. Phosphorus Lake Whatcom Cooperative Management.

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION

PROPOSED TOR FOR EIA STUDY

MBJ Environmental Programmes

Construction Site Inspection Checklist for OHC By making use of some simple Best Management Practices (BMPs) a construction site operator can

NASA Stennis Space Center Environmental Resources Document

The key points of the 2013 Annual Compliance Report are described fully in the following sections of this report:

Vehicle Tracking Pad

Various options are discussed below.these low cost, low impact interventions can also be applied as general erosion control methods.

APPROVAL AMENDMENT HISTORY

CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES COMPARISON

A water quality monitoring network for environmental management of port areas An example from the Port of Venice

Department of Environmental Engineering

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST. Project Name: Site Plan No.:

Standards: Human activity has consequences on living organisms and ecosystems. (94412, )

Post Construction Stormwater Management Checklist Program

City of Beverly Hills Construction Stormwater Requirement Checklist

6 Chemicals from human settlements

ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT IN SUPPORT OF COMAH AND PPC

CONSTRUCTION PERMIT SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Impact Assessment: Planning Guidance for Developers

10/4/ slide sample of Presentation. Key Principles to Current Stormwater Management

C. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Yes No Response / Comment. D. Good Site Management Housekeeping Yes No Response / Comment

Welcome to the Understanding Dissolved Oxygen learning module. This section provides information on the following topics:

Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDS) A guide for developers

ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS

Minimizes sediment and debris from entering storm drains that lead to waterways and watercourses.

Sustainable Landscape Maintenance Planning and Strategies

Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. Detention Ponds. CIVL 1112 Detention Ponds - Part 1 1/12

Begin forwarded message:

Permeable Pavement Construction Guide

PRIVATE TREATMENT CONTROL BMP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE VERIFICATION FORM BIORETENTION FACILITIES, VEGETATED SWALES & HIGHER RATE BIOFILTERS

FUTURE CHALLENGES OF PROVIDING HIGH-QUALITY WATER - Vol. II - Environmental Impact of Food Production and Consumption - Palaniappa Krishnan

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC

3. Given the geographic extent of the area, amendments have been made to the following regional planning documents

Lisgar District Basement Water Infiltration Investigation Answers to Residents Written Questions Received by Councillors Ward 10 Office

SECTION 5.4 LOGJAM REMOVAL AND RIVER RESTORATION. Overview. Logjam Removal Using Heavy. Tools. Machinery. Large-Scale River Restoration

How To Amend A Stormwater Ordinance

Operations and Maintenance Plan The Residences at Johnson Farm 189 Landham Road Sudbury, Massachusetts. Submitted to: Town of Sudbury

Appendix A1. Register of legal and other requirements

DOÑA ANA COUNTY DESIGN STORM CRITERIA GUIDELINES FOR COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SITES. Run-off Analysis Methods

DESIGN OF STORM WATER DETENTION POND

Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavement (PICP) A Low Impact Development Tool Training for Schools and Universities

HIGHWAYS. Drainage design on M25 motorway widening project (J16 - J23) Brijesh Vats

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

Chapter 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Park Operations

Sewerage Management System for Reduction of River Pollution

Transcription:

E Appendix E Water Quality Risk Assessment Template Introduction The following template has been prepared as a basis for the production of a Water Quality Risk Assessment. Refer to Section 5 of the Protecting Waterways Manual for an explanation of each step. Note, for larger and more complex projects the risk assessment should be undertaken for various areas of the site that may have different risks.

Water Quality Risk Assessment (Project Name) This water quality risk assessment process (as set out in the DPTI Protecting Waterways Manual) aims to determine the potential nature, scale and likelihood of any impacts on water quality during both the construction and operational phases of (Project Name) to assist in identifying appropriate management measures to manage the project impacts. The main steps in the risk management process are: 1. Establish the context 2. Identify risks 3. Analyse risks 4. Evaluate risks 5. Treat risks 1. Context Setting (Refer to Section 5.2.2 of the Protecting Waterways Manual for more details). 1.1. Purpose and nature of the project 1.2. Legislative compliance requirements 1.3. Relevant plans including Natural Resource Management Plans 1.4. Environmental concerns raised by the community 1.5. Risk acceptance criteria 2. Identification of Risk (Include consideration of both Construction and Operational Phases. Refer to Section 5.2.3 of the Protecting Waterways Manual for more details). 2.1. Site Characteristics Topography of the site Nature and erodibility of soils Drainage pattern and size of catchments Quality and nature of surface receiving waters 2

Quality and depth to groundwater and any pollution transport mechanisms Vegetation and ecology of the site and surrounding area including the downstream aquatic environment. Purpose and capabilities of any water quality treatment measures already in place downstream of the project area. 2.2. Project Characteristics Timing and scale of the project. Proposed staging of the project. Extent of cut and fill. Volume and nature of traffic, extent of commercial vehicles or hazardous loads. Potential traffic accident characteristics. Concentration or dispersion of stormwater, changing the nature, timing and location and quality of flows or altering flood patterns. The effect of the project on any water quality treatment measures already in place downstream of the project area. Impediments to achieving any water quality objectives for the catchment Scouring and erosion of the project site. Changes to flow regime, volumes and peak flows, temperature changes. The potential for spillage or leakage of toxic substances used on site. 3. Analysis and Evaluation of Risk for the Operational Phase The Risks arising from the site and project characteristics identified in Section 2 were examined in regard to the likelihood and consequences of the risk occurring. The following questions were considered: How likely is it to happen? What could be the consequence if it does happen? A qualitative risk analysis matrix was used to evaluate the level of risk for the Operational Phase. The results are documented in Table 1. The Construction phase risks are dealt with in Section 4. Consequence Likelihood Low Minor adverse social or environmental impact Medium Measurable adverse environmental or social impact. Will result in annoyance or nuisance to community High Significant damage or impact on environmental systems and local community Low The event could occur only rarely, or is unlikely to occur Very Low Risk Low Risk Medium Risk (could be High) 3

Medium The event will occur occasionally or could occur High The event will occur often or is most likely to occur Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk Medium Risk High Risk High Risk (Critical) (Note for larger and more complex projects this assessment should be undertaken for various areas of the site which may have different risks. Refer to Appendix B of the Protecting Waterways Manual for information on treatment measures). 4

Table 1 Operational Phase Risk Assessment Risk Likelihood Consequence Risk Proposed Management Measures Reassessed Risk (following implementation of Management Measures) Heavy metal export creating toxicity in downstream environment Industrial pollutants being deposited on road surface, to be later washed off. Hydrocarbons from vehicles creating significant Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) in the downstream environment. Sediment export causing increased turbidity, decreased light penetration and smothering of aquatic vegetation. Nutrient export creating impact on water bodies Vegetative matter washed into waterways, and creating BOD Significant litter export having a visual impact Accidental Spills (including hazardous) Runoff volume change causing erosion or saturation downstream Runoff peak flow in excess of downstream pipe capacity Runoff temperature change having an impact on biota Pollutants entering groundwater VL Very Low H High L Low C Critical M Medium N/A Not applicable for this location 5 5

4. Analysis and Evaluation of Risk for the Construction Phase The Risks arising from the site and project characteristics identified in Section 2 were examined in regard to the likelihood and consequences of the risk occurring. The following questions were considered: How likely is it to happen? What could be the consequence if it does happen? A qualitative risk analysis matrix was used to evaluate the level of risk for the Construction Phase. The results are documented in Table 2. Consequence Likelihood Low Minor adverse social or environmental impact Medium Measurable adverse environmental or social impact. Will result in annoyance or nuisance to community High Significant damage or impact on environmental systems and local community Low The event could occur only rarely, or is unlikely to occur Medium The event will occur occasionally or could occur High The event will occur often or is most likely to occur Very Low Risk Low Risk Medium Risk (could be High) Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk Medium Risk High Risk High Risk (Critical) (Note for larger and more complex projects this assessment should be undertaken for various areas of the site which may have different risks. Refer to Appendix C of the Protecting Waterways Manual for information on treatment measures). 6

Table 2 Construction Phase Risk Assessment Risk Likelihood Consequence Risk Proposed Management Measures Accidental spills affecting waterways Pollution of waterways because of proximity of worksite Extra turbidity due to pile driving affecting water quality Dredging exporting sediment to deposit elsewhere in the watercourse Soil erosion that causes significant deposition in watercourses. Reassessed Risk (following implementation of Management Measures) VL Very Low H High L Low C Critical M Medium N/A Not applicable for this location 7

4.1. Water Sensitive Urban Design Targets The project is assessed to determine if the setting of water sensitive urban design targets is appropriate. 4.2. Initial Site Erosion Risk Assessment The risk of soil erosion may be determined by the application of the initial site erosion risk procedure. (Refer to Table 5.4 of the manual for an explanation of this assessment). Table 2 - Initial Site Erosion Risk Assessment Location Average Slope Soil type Duration of risk Area disturbed Parameter Sensitivity of Receiving area Total Score Score 4.3. Soil Erosion & Drainage Management Plan Discussion regarding required detail of SEDMP. (Refer to Section 5.5.2 and 7.3 of the Protecting Waterways Manual and Appendix B1 for more details). 4.4. Water Quality Monitoring Discussion regarding level and duration of Water Quality Monitoring. (Refer to the Water Quality Monitoring Manual for Construction Sites). Discussion regarding other construction phase risks. 5. Treatment of Risks Discussion regarding treatment of risks. (Refer to Appendix A and C for information on treatment measures). 6. Workshop Participants If a workshop was held to formulate this risk assessment the participants should be recorded here. 8