UL COMPLIANCE REPORT

UL COMPLIANCE REPORT CUSTOMER NAME: Rize Enterprises LLC 1st Fl 81 Spence St. Bay Shore, NY 11706 PRODUCT NAME: KL100, KL150 and KL200 Kwik-Locs with accessories TESTED TO: Telcordia Technologies GR-63-CORE, Issue 3, March 2006 Sections 4.4.1 and 4.4.4 Date: 03/14/2012 Project: 12CA05794 Report: R 12CA05794 VERIZON INDEPENDENT TESTING LABORATORY: UL LLC 12 Laboratory Dr., RTP, NC 27709 Issued By: Date: 03/14/2012 Reviewed By: Date: 03/14/2012

Release Control Record Issue No. Reason for change Date Issued <1> None, original 03/14/2012 <2> <3> <4> Underwriters Laboratories Inc. reports apply only to the specific samples tested under stated test conditions. All samples tested were in good operating condition throughout the entire test program. It is the manufacturer's responsibility to assure that additional production units of this model are manufactured with identical electrical and mechanical components. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. shall have no liability for any deductions, inferences or generalizations drawn by the client or others from Underwriters Laboratories Inc. issued reports. This report shall not be used to claim, constitute or imply product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, A2LA, or any agency of the US government. This report may contain test results that are not covered by the NVLAP or A2LA accreditation. The scope of accreditation is limited to the specific tests that are listed on the NVLAP and/or A2LA websites referenced at the end of this report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Test Results Summary... 5 Overview... 6 Earthquake Environment and Criteria (4.4.1)... 12 Office Vibration Environment and Criteria (4.4.4)... 27 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Earthquake and Office Vibration Summary of Test Results... 5 Table 2: EUT Photos and Description... 7 Table 3: Earthquake Environment Detailed List of Test Equipment... 26 Table 4: Office Vibration and Criteria Detailed List of Test Equipment... 31 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1: Earthquake and Office Vibration Configuration (S-S)... 8 Figure 2: Earthquake and Office Vibration Configuration (V)... 9 Figure 3: Test 1 - KL150 & KL200 Configuration... 10 Figure 4: Test 2 - KL100 & KL150 Configuration... 10 Figure 5: Test 3 KL100 Configuration... 11 Figure 6: Acceleration - Fixture - (S-S)... 15 Figure 7: Acceleration - Weights - (S-S)... 15 Figure 8: Time History - (S-S)... 16 Figure 9: RRS/TRS - (S-S)... 16 Figure 10: Relative Displacement - (S-S)... 16 Figure 11: Acceleration - Fixture - (V)... 17 Figure 12: Acceleration - Weight - (V)... 17 Figure 13: Time History - (V)... 17 Figure 14: RRS/TRS - (V)... 18 Figure 15: Acceleration - Fixture - (S-S)... 19 Figure 16: Acceleration - Weights - (S-S)... 19 Figure 17: Time History - (S-S)... 20 Figure 18: RRS/TRS - (S-S)... 20 Figure 19: Relative Displacement - (S-S)... 20 Figure 20: Acceleration - Fixture - (V)... 21 Figure 21: Acceleration - Weights - (V)... 21 Figure 22: Time History - (V)... 21 Figure 23: RRS/TRS - (V)... 22 Figure 24: Acceleration - Fixture - (S-S)... 23 Figure 25: Acceleration - Weights - (S-S)... 23 Figure 26: Time History - (S-S)... 24 Project: 12CA05794 Page 3 of 31 Part 23

Figure 27: RRS/TRS - (S-S)... 24 Figure 28: Relative Displacement - (S-S)... 24 Figure 29: Acceleration - Fixture - (V)... 25 Figure 30: Acceleration - Weights - (V)... 25 Figure 31: Time History - (V)... 25 Figure 32: RRS/TRS - (V)... 26 Figure 33: Test 1 -Office Vibration Plot - (F-B)... 28 Figure 34: Test 1 - Office Vibration Plot - (V)... 28 Figure 35: Test 2 - Office Vibration Plot - (S-S)... 29 Figure 36: Test 2 - Office Vibration Plot - (V)... 29 Figure 37: Test 3 - Office Vibration Plot - (S-S)... 30 Figure 38: Test 3 - Office Vibration Plot - (V)... 30 Project: 12CA05794 Page 4 of 31 Part 23

TEST RESULTS SUMMARY The KL100, KL150 and KL200 Kwik-Locs with accessories met the requirements and objectives for Section 4.4.1 and 4.4.4, Earthquake and Office Vibration, of Telcordia Technologies GR-63-CORE, Issue 3, March 2006. Column Heading Definitions for Summary of Test Results Table The following Summary of Test Results table contains these columns of information: Section column gives the Section numbers from GR-63-CORE. Section Name column gives the Section name from GR-63-CORE. Criteria column gives the local number of the requirement (e.g., R3-1) from GR-63-CORE and the absolute number of the requirement (e.g., [2]). Results column gives the results of the evaluation (Compliant, Non-compliant, etc.). - Compliant: The Equipment Under Test met the requirements of the corresponding criteria. - Non-compliant: The Equipment Under Test did not meet the requirements of the corresponding criteria. - NA: The criteria were Not Applicable to Equipment Under Test {Explanation Required} - ENR: An Evaluation, to these criteria, was Not Requested by the customer. Page column gives the page number, in this report, for the corresponding criteria. Table 1: Earthquake and Office Vibration Summary of Test Results Section Section Name Criteria Results Comments Page 4.4.1 Earthquake Environment and Criteria 4.4.1.2 Physical Performance Criteria R4-68 [110] - - - R4-69 [111] R4-70 [112] O4-71 [113] 4.4.1.3 Functional Performance R4-72 [114] 4.4.4 Office Vibration Environment and Criteria O4-73 [115] 4.4.4.2 Physical Performance Criteria R4-81 [122] 4.4.4.3 Functional Performance Criteria R4-82 [123] Compliant Compliant Project: 12CA05794 Page 5 of 31 Part 23 NA NA NA NA Compliant NA None. 12 None. The EUT is not a framework. The EUT is not a framework. The EUT is a mechanical device. The EUT is a mechanical device. 12 12 12 12 12 None. 27 The EUT is a mechanical device. 27

OVERVIEW Project Objective Testing was performed to determine if the KL100, KL150 and KL200 Kwik-Locs with accessories met the requirements for Section 4.4.1 and 4.4.4, Earthquake and Office Vibration, of Telcordia Technologies GR-63- CORE, Issue 3, March 2006. Equipment Configuration and Test Conditions Equipment Under Test Rated Load Tested Load 1/16 th with KL100 (CL12) 75 lbs 80 lbs 3/32 nd with KL100 (CL12) 150 lbs 160 lbs 3/32 nd with KL150 (CL118) 150 lbs 160 lbs 1/8 th with KL150 (CL118) 225 lbs 240 lbs 1/8 th with KL200 (CL23) 250 lbs 240 lbs Test Configurations Test 1: 1/8 Cable with KL200 (CL23) & KL150 (CL118), ¾ wide seismic bracket & 3 hole seismic bracket Test 2: 3/32 Cable with KL150 (CL118) & KL100 (CL12), ¾ wide 10/32 seismic bracket & 3 hole seismic bracket Test 3: 1/16 Cable with KL100 (CL12), 10/32 seismic bracket Project: 12CA05794 Page 6 of 31 Part 23

Table 2: EUT Photos and Description Equipment Under Test Photo KL200 KWIK-LOC KL150 KWIK-LOC KL100 KWIK-LOC Wire Rope (1/16, 3/32, 1/8 ) 3-hole bracket used with 1/8 wire rope, KL150 and KL200 (Test 1) and with 3/32 wire rope, KL150 and KL100 (Test 2) ¾ wide bracket used with 1/8 wire rope, KL150 and KL200 (Test 1) ¾ wide 10/32 seismic bracket used with 3/32 wire rope, KL150 and KL100 (Test 2) 10/32 seismic bracket used with 1/16 wire rope and KL100 (Test 3) Project: 12CA05794 Page 7 of 31 Part 23

Figure 1: Earthquake and Office Vibration Configuration (S-S) Project: 12CA05794 Page 8 of 31 Part 23

Figure 2: Earthquake and Office Vibration Configuration (V) Project: 12CA05794 Page 9 of 31 Part 23

Figure 3: Test 1 - KL150 & KL200 Configuration Figure 4: Test 2 - KL100 & KL150 Configuration Project: 12CA05794 Page 10 of 31 Part 23

Figure 5: Test 3 KL100 Configuration Equipment Operating Conditions NA- The EUT is a mechanical device. Pass/ Fail Criteria All equipment shall be constructed to sustain the waveform testing of Section 5.4.1, Earthquake Test Methods, without permanent structural or mechanical damage. Additionally, during the waveform testing of Section 5.4.1, Earthquake Test Methods, the maximum single-amplitude deflection at the cable tray, relative to the base, cannot exceed 75 mm (3 in). Project: 12CA05794 Page 11 of 31 Part 23

EARTHQUAKE ENVIRONMENT AND CRITERIA (4.4.1) Physical Performance Criteria (4.4.1.2) Criteria During this test, only the equipment shelf s physical performance is considered. Permanent structural or mechanical damage of the framework or its fastening hardware would not constitute a failure, but may invalidate the test. Permanent structural damage is defined as deformation of any load-bearing element of the equipment being tested, or any connection failure. Typical examples of permanent structural damage are bent or buckled uprights, deformed bases, cracks, and failed anchors or fastening hardware. Mechanical damage is defined as any dislocation or separation of components. Examples or mechanical damage are disengaged cards and modules, and opened (ajar) doors, drawers, or covers. R4-68 [110] All equipment shall be constructed to sustain the waveform testing of Section 5.4.1, Earthquake Test Methods, without permanent structural or mechanical damage. R4-69 [111] Frame-level equipment shall be constructed so that during the waveform testing of Section 5.4.1, Earthquake Test Methods, the maximum single-amplitude deflection at the top of the framework, relative to the base, does not exceed 75 mm (3 in). R4-70 [112] Frame-level equipment shall have a natural mechanical frequency greater than 2.0 Hz as determined by the swept sine survey of Section 5.4.1, Earthquake Test Methods. O4-71 [113] Frame-level equipment should have a natural mechanical frequency greater than 6.0 Hz as determined by the swept sine survey of Section 5.4.1, Earthquake Test Methods. Functional Performance (4.4.1.3) Criteria The criterion for assessing functionality depends on the service provided by the equipment being tested. The criteria are determined by applying appropriate Telcordia generic requirements or, if none exist, by reviewing the supplier s or purchaser s own performance specifications. R4-72 [114] All equipment shall be constructed to meet applicable functionality requirements immediately before and after each axis of waveform testing of Section 5.4.1, Earthquake Test Methods. The equipment shall sustain operation without replacement of components, manual rebooting, or human intervention. O4-73 [115] All equipment should be constructed to meet applicable functionality requirements continuously during waveform testing of Section 5.4.1, Earthquake Test Methods. These functionality criteria shall demonstrate that the equipment has sustained operation without loss of service during the testing. Project: 12CA05794 Page 12 of 31 Part 23

Test Location The following evaluation was performed by Chris Rose between 2012/02/23 and 2012/02/24 at Underwriters Laboratories, 12 Laboratory Dr., RTP, NC 27709. Test Method Test Configurations Mount the equipment to its supporting framework as it would be installed in service. Wire rope should be attached from the test fixture to the cable tray at an angle of 45 degrees (+/- 5) at four locations. The cable tray should then be loaded to the rated load of the EUT with the weight evenly distributed. Mounting hardware should be torqued to the specified load (if applicable). Instrumentation Configuration Locate the accelerometers so they record the following: acceleration of the shaker table, acceleration at the top of the framework, and acceleration at the cable tray. Install deflection measurement equipment to measure the deflection at the cable tray relative to its base. Follow this procedure for vertical and side-to-side axes: Test Procedure NOTE: Testing in the front to back axis is not required. In normal installations the cable tray would be fixed at the ends which would prevent deflection and physical damage in that plane. 1. Verify equipment physical condition. 2. Subject the equipment to the VERTEQII waveform. Verify the TRS meets or exceeds the RRS in the frequency range from 1.0 to 50 Hz. If the TRS is below the RRS at any point, use the last drive signal and table acceleration to update the transfer function. Apply it to the Telcordia waveform to generate a new drive signal, and retest the equipment. Repeat this step as necessary. The TRS should not exceed the RRS by more than 30% in the frequency range of 1 to 7 Hz. A test may be invalid if an equipment failure occurs when the TRS exceeds the RRS by more than 30% in this frequency range. 3. Record the displacement and acceleration data during the shaking. 4. Thoroughly inspect the equipment and note all changes to its physical condition. 5. Record any reductions in anchor or fastener torques. Project: 12CA05794 Page 13 of 31 Part 23

Videotape Procedure: 1. The video shall clearly show the front view of the frame and enable the motion of the top of the framework relative to the base to be observed. 2. The video should include a date stamp and time references in increments of 0.1 of a second. 3. Prior to performing the earthquake profile, the videographer should zoom in on the EUT so that the status of the LEDs is visible. 4. At the completion of the test, the videographer should again zoom in on the EUT so that any change in the status of the LEDs can be noted. 5. All videos should include slides detailing each segment of the earthquake testing. This should include at a minimum: a. Manufacturer b. Model c. Project Number d. Date e. Referenced document f. Zone g. Axis 6. Videos should be edited to eliminate any extraneous footage such as equipment set-up and dead space. Test Results The KL100, KL150 and KL200 Kwik-Locs with accessories are compliant with Requirements R4-68 [110] and R4-69 [111]. The KL100, KL150 and KL200 Kwik-Locs with accessories are NA with Requirements R4-70 [112] and R4-72 [114] and Objectives O4-71 [113] and O4-73 [115]. The EUT is not a framework and does not include functional components. Project: 12CA05794 Page 14 of 31 Part 23

EUT Configuration 1/8 Cable with KL200 (CL23) & KL150 (CL118) & ¾ wide seismic bracket & 3 hole seismic bracket Y-Axis (Side to Side) Z-Axis (Vertical) Maximum displacement 2.08 NA Did the equipment sustain a change in physical condition? Yes No Yes No If yes, please describe. Cable Tray Weight 240lbs Figure 6: Acceleration - Fixture - (S-S) Figure 7: Acceleration - Weights - (S-S) Project: 12CA05794 Page 15 of 31 Part 23

Figure 8: Time History - (S-S) Figure 9: RRS/TRS - (S-S) Figure 10: Relative Displacement - (S-S) Project: 12CA05794 Page 16 of 31 Part 23

Figure 11: Acceleration - Fixture - (V) Figure 12: Acceleration - Weight - (V) Figure 13: Time History - (V) Project: 12CA05794 Page 17 of 31 Part 23

Figure 14: RRS/TRS - (V) Project: 12CA05794 Page 18 of 31 Part 23

EUT Configuration 3/32 Cable with KL150 (CL118) & KL100 (CL12) ¾ wide 10/32 seismic bracket & 3 hole seismic bracket Y-Axis (Side to Side) Z-Axis (Vertical) Maximum displacement 1.66 NA Did the equipment sustain a change in physical condition? Yes No Yes No If yes, please describe. Cable Tray Weight 160lbs Figure 15: Acceleration - Fixture - (S-S) Figure 16: Acceleration - Weights - (S-S) Project: 12CA05794 Page 19 of 31 Part 23

Figure 17: Time History - (S-S) Figure 18: RRS/TRS - (S-S) Figure 19: Relative Displacement - (S-S) Project: 12CA05794 Page 20 of 31 Part 23

Figure 20: Acceleration - Fixture - (V) Figure 21: Acceleration - Weights - (V) Figure 22: Time History - (V) Project: 12CA05794 Page 21 of 31 Part 23

Figure 23: RRS/TRS - (V) Project: 12CA05794 Page 22 of 31 Part 23

EUT Configuration 1/16 Cable with KL100 (CL12) Y-Axis (Side to Side) Z-Axis (Vertical) Maximum displacement 1.86 NA Did the equipment sustain a change in physical condition? Yes No Yes No If yes, please describe. Cable Tray Weight 80lbs Figure 24: Acceleration - Fixture - (S-S) Figure 25: Acceleration - Weights - (S-S) Project: 12CA05794 Page 23 of 31 Part 23

Figure 26: Time History - (S-S) Figure 27: RRS/TRS - (S-S) Figure 28: Relative Displacement - (S-S) Project: 12CA05794 Page 24 of 31 Part 23

Figure 29: Acceleration - Fixture - (V) Figure 30: Acceleration - Weights - (V) Figure 31: Time History - (V) Project: 12CA05794 Page 25 of 31 Part 23

Figure 32: RRS/TRS - (V) Test Equipment Used Table 3: Earthquake Environment Detailed List of Test Equipment Description Serial Manufacturer Model Cal. Date Cal. Due Number Signal Generator AX0037 LDS Laser 2011/12/30 2012/12/30 Accelerometer AX0042 Dytran 3055B4T 2011/02/24 2012/02/29 Accelerometer AX0043 Dytran 3055B4T 2011/02/24 2012/02/29 Accelerometer AX0030 Dytran 3202A1 2011/12/16 2012/12/31 Accelerometer AX0031 Dytran 3202A1 2011/12/16 2012/12/31 Tape Measure MG0491 Lufkin Y35ME 2011/06/03 2014/06/30 Sonic Transducer MG1127 Senix Ultra-U 2011/11/08 2012/11/30 Sonic Transducer MG1144 Senix Ultra-U 2011/11/08 2012/11/30 Project: 12CA05794 Page 26 of 31 Part 23

OFFICE VIBRATION ENVIRONMENT AND CRITERIA (4.4.4) Physical Performance Criteria (4.4.4.2) Criteria R4-81 [122] All equipment shall be constructed to sustain the office vibration testing of Section 5.4.2, Office Vibration Test Procedure, without permanent structural or mechanical damage. Functional Performance Criteria (4.4.4.3) Criteria R4-82 [123] All equipment shall be constructed to meet applicable functionality requirements continuously during each axis of the office vibration testing of Section 5.4.2, Office Vibration Test Procedure. The equipment shall sustain operation without replacement of components, manual rebooting, or human intervention. Test Location The following evaluation was performed by Chris Rose between 2012/02/23 and 2012/02/24 at Underwriters Laboratories, 12 Laboratory Dr., RTP, NC 27709. Test Method Note: Test configurations for office vibration are the same as earthquake. Refer to the test method of Section 4.4.1. 1. Mount the equipment being tested. 2. Subject the equipment to a swept sine survey at an acceleration amplitude of 0.1 g from 5 to 100 Hz and back to 5 Hz at a rate of 0.1 octave/minute. The duration of this sweep is approximately 90 minutes. 3. Repeat the sweep for each of three (3) mutually perpendicular framework axes. Project: 12CA05794 Page 27 of 31 Part 23

Test Results The KL100, KL150 and KL200 Kwik-Locs with accessories are compliant with R4-81 [122], R4-82 [123]. EUT Configuration 1/8 Cable with KL200 (CL23) & KL150 (CL118) & ¾ wide seismic bracket & 3 hole seismic bracket Cable Tray Weight 240lbs Axis Physical Damage Comments Y Yes None. (Side to Side) Z (Vertical) No Yes No None. Figure 33: Test 1 -Office Vibration Plot - (S-S) gn 12.5893 White = Control / Red = Fixture / Blue = Weights input1(f)_0 input2(f) input3(f) 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0040 5.00 10.00 Frequency (Hz) 100.00 gn 5.0119 1.0000 Figure 34: Test 1 - Office Vibration Plot - (V) White = Control / Red = Fixture / Blue = Weights input1(f)_0 input2(f) input3(f) 0.1000 0.0133 5.00 10.00 Frequency (Hz) 100.00 Project: 12CA05794 Page 28 of 31 Part 23

EUT Configuration 3/32 Cable with KL150 (CL118) & KL100 (CL12) ¾ wide 10/32 seismic bracket & 3 hole seismic bracket Cable Tray Weight 160lbs Axis Physical Damage Comments Y Yes None (Side to Side) Z (Vertical) No Yes No None Figure 35: Test 2 - Office Vibration Plot - (S-S) gn 15.8489 10.0000 White = Control / Red = Fixture / Blue = Weights input1(f)_0 input2(f) input3(f) 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0011 5.00 10.00 Frequency (Hz) 100.00 gn 5.6234 Figure 36: Test 2 - Office Vibration Plot - (V) White = Control / Red = Fixture / Blue = Weights input1(f)_0 input2(f) input3(f) 1.0000 0.1000 0.0316 5.00 10.00 Frequency (Hz) 100.00 Project: 12CA05794 Page 29 of 31 Part 23

EUT Configuration 1/16 Cable with KL100 (CL12) Cable Tray Weight 80lbs Axis Physical Damage Comments Y Yes None (Side to Side) No Z (Vertical) Yes No None Figure 37: Test 3 - Office Vibration Plot - (S-S) gn 12.5893 White = Control / Red = Fixture / Blue = Weights input1(f)_0 input2(f) input3(f) 1.0000 0.1000 0.0100 0.0056 5.00 10.00 Frequency (Hz) 100.00 gn 8.9125 Figure 38: Test 3 - Office Vibration Plot - (V) White = Control / Red = Fixture / Blue = Weights input1(f)_0 input2(f) input3(f) 1.0000 0.1000 0.0178 5.00 10.00 Frequency (Hz) 100.00 Project: 12CA05794 Page 30 of 31 Part 23

Test Equipment Used Table 4: Office Vibration and Criteria Detailed List of Test Equipment Description Serial Manufacturer Model Cal. Date Cal. Due Number Signal Generator AX0037 LDS Laser 2011/12/30 2012/12/30 Accelerometer AX0042 Dytran 3055B4T 2011/02/24 2012/02/29 Accelerometer AX0043 Dytran 3055B4T 2011/02/24 2012/02/29 Accelerometer AX0030 Dytran 3202A1 2011/12/16 2012/12/31 Accelerometer AX0031 Dytran 3202A1 2011/12/16 2012/12/31 Project: 12CA05794 Page 31 of 31 Part 23