Applications of Linear Algebra in Economics: Input-Output and Inter-Industry Analysis. From: Lucas Davidson To: Professor Tushar Das May, 2010

Similar documents
Row Echelon Form and Reduced Row Echelon Form

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS. + + x 2. x n. a 11 a 12 a 1n b 1 a 21 a 22 a 2n b 2 a 31 a 32 a 3n b 3. a m1 a m2 a mn b m

Question 2: How do you solve a matrix equation using the matrix inverse?

MATRIX ALGEBRA AND SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS

Linearly Independent Sets and Linearly Dependent Sets

Linear Programming. March 14, 2014

Unit 18 Determinants

5.5. Solving linear systems by the elimination method

Abstract: We describe the beautiful LU factorization of a square matrix (or how to write Gaussian elimination in terms of matrix multiplication).

Solving Systems of Linear Equations

Notes on Orthogonal and Symmetric Matrices MENU, Winter 2013

x = + x 2 + x

Topic 4: Different approaches to GDP

MATH10212 Linear Algebra. Systems of Linear Equations. Definition. An n-dimensional vector is a row or a column of n numbers (or letters): a 1.

SYSTEMS OF EQUATIONS AND MATRICES WITH THE TI-89. by Joseph Collison

Introduction to Matrix Algebra

Operation Count; Numerical Linear Algebra

Homogeneous systems of algebraic equations. A homogeneous (ho-mo-geen -ius) system of linear algebraic equations is one in which

1 Determinants and the Solvability of Linear Systems

1 Introduction to Matrices

Math Quizzes Winter 2009

Solving Mass Balances using Matrix Algebra

Using row reduction to calculate the inverse and the determinant of a square matrix

Similar matrices and Jordan form

LS.6 Solution Matrices

5 Systems of Equations

Notes on Determinant

11th National Convention on Statistics (NCS) EDSA Shangri-La Hotel October 4-5, 2010

Nominal, Real and PPP GDP

2x + y = 3. Since the second equation is precisely the same as the first equation, it is enough to find x and y satisfying the system

Name: Section Registered In:

December 4, 2013 MATH 171 BASIC LINEAR ALGEBRA B. KITCHENS

10.2 ITERATIVE METHODS FOR SOLVING LINEAR SYSTEMS. The Jacobi Method

MAT 200, Midterm Exam Solution. a. (5 points) Compute the determinant of the matrix A =

Math 115A HW4 Solutions University of California, Los Angeles. 5 2i 6 + 4i. (5 2i)7i (6 + 4i)( 3 + i) = 35i + 14 ( 22 6i) = i.

5.1 Radical Notation and Rational Exponents

Solving Systems of Linear Equations Using Matrices

Lecture 2 Matrix Operations

Systems of Equations

Section 1.3 P 1 = 1 2. = P n = 1 P 3 = Continuing in this fashion, it should seem reasonable that, for any n = 1, 2, 3,..., =

Linear Algebra Notes

T ( a i x i ) = a i T (x i ).

[1] Diagonal factorization

2.3. Finding polynomial functions. An Introduction:

Recall that two vectors in are perpendicular or orthogonal provided that their dot

a 11 x 1 + a 12 x a 1n x n = b 1 a 21 x 1 + a 22 x a 2n x n = b 2.

What is Linear Programming?

Reduced echelon form: Add the following conditions to conditions 1, 2, and 3 above:

MATH2210 Notebook 1 Fall Semester 2016/ MATH2210 Notebook Solving Systems of Linear Equations... 3

1 Solving LPs: The Simplex Algorithm of George Dantzig

8.2. Solution by Inverse Matrix Method. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes

DATA ANALYSIS II. Matrix Algorithms

8 Square matrices continued: Determinants

NOTES ON LINEAR TRANSFORMATIONS

Households Wages, profit, interest, rent = $750. Factor markets. Wages, profit, interest, rent = $750

Solution to Homework 2

9.2 Summation Notation

5 Homogeneous systems

Department of Chemical Engineering ChE-101: Approaches to Chemical Engineering Problem Solving MATLAB Tutorial VI

by the matrix A results in a vector which is a reflection of the given

Binary Adders: Half Adders and Full Adders

Au = = = 3u. Aw = = = 2w. so the action of A on u and w is very easy to picture: it simply amounts to a stretching by 3 and 2, respectively.

Solving Linear Systems, Continued and The Inverse of a Matrix

Review of Fundamental Mathematics

Linear Algebra Notes for Marsden and Tromba Vector Calculus

Linear Programming. April 12, 2005

Lesson 7 - The Aggregate Expenditure Model

Lecture 5: Singular Value Decomposition SVD (1)

Solving simultaneous equations using the inverse matrix

Solutions to Math 51 First Exam January 29, 2015

Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

α = u v. In other words, Orthogonal Projection

LINEAR ALGEBRA. September 23, 2010

Chapter 7 - Roots, Radicals, and Complex Numbers

Math 4310 Handout - Quotient Vector Spaces

3.2 Matrix Multiplication

Linear Programming Notes VII Sensitivity Analysis

Methods for Finding Bases

CURVE FITTING LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATION

Matrices 2. Solving Square Systems of Linear Equations; Inverse Matrices

Figure 1.1 Vector A and Vector F

Torgerson s Classical MDS derivation: 1: Determining Coordinates from Euclidean Distances

Note on growth and growth accounting

Matrix Algebra. Some Basic Matrix Laws. Before reading the text or the following notes glance at the following list of basic matrix algebra laws.

Applied Finite Mathematics Second Edition. Rupinder Sekhon De Anza College Cupertino, California. Page 1

MATH APPLIED MATRIX THEORY

Math 2524: Activity 3 (Excel and Matrices, continued) Fall 2002

Practical Guide to the Simplex Method of Linear Programming

Cubes and Cube Roots

The Mathematics 11 Competency Test Percent Increase or Decrease

Systems of Linear Equations

The Determinant: a Means to Calculate Volume

Zeros of a Polynomial Function

160 CHAPTER 4. VECTOR SPACES

Constrained optimization.

Professor Christina Romer. LECTURE 17 MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES AND ISSUES March 17, 2016

Introduction to Matrices for Engineers

Vector Math Computer Graphics Scott D. Anderson

Linear Equations ! $ & " % & " 11,750 12,750 13,750% MATHEMATICS LEARNING SERVICE Centre for Learning and Professional Development

TIME VALUE OF MONEY. In following we will introduce one of the most important and powerful concepts you will learn in your study of finance;

Transcription:

Applications of Linear Algebra in Economics: Input-Output and Inter-Industry Analysis. From: Lucas Davidson To: Professor Tushar Das May, 2010 1

1. Introduction In 1973 Wessily Leontiff won the Noble Prize in Economics for his work in input-output analysis. His seminal work allowed for a greater quantification of economic models. Input-output analysis, also called Inter Industry Analysis, creates an environment where the user can predict the consumption and demand for a system. This system can be as small as a single business or as large as the greater global economy. It is interesting to note that the input-output analysis is robust enough deal with both closed systems, and ones where commodities are flowing into and out the systems (i.e.imports, exports, taxes, etc...). Regardless of the size or composition of the system which is being analyzed the procedure is essentially the same. 2. Input-Output Matrices The procedure begins by looking at an input-output matrix of a given economy. An input-output matrix demonstrates how goods from one industry are consumed in other industries. The rows of the matrix represent the producing sector of the economy, while the columns of the matrix represent the consuming sector of the economy. A general example of the input-output matrix is in figure 1, where S 1 through S n are sectors of the economy and where the the set of sectors [S 1, S n ] is the entire producing economy. From \To S 1 S 2... S n S 1 a 11 a 12... a 1n S 2 a 21 a 22... a 2n....... S n a n1 a n2... a nn Input Output General Matrix = The entry a ij represents the the amount of goods from sector i sector j demands. An example of a simplified input-output matrix is in Fig. 2. Simplified Matrix A = From \To Agricultural Sector M anuf acturing Sector Labor Sector Agricultural Sector 40 20 40 M anuf acturing Sector 20 20 40 Labor Sector 40 200 80 In the simplified example entry A 11 represents the amount product of the agricultural sector uses that is produced by itself, in this case forty units of goods. Likewise, entries A 12 and A 13 represent how much product produced (1) (2) 2

by the agricultural sector is used in the manufacturing sector and labor sector respectively. Similarly A 21 is the amount of product produced by the manufacturing sector that is consumed by the agricultural sector and so on. It is interesting to note that this matrix is infinitely scalable, there can be any number of sectors or firms in this matrix. Also the input-output matrix is always square, which is quite helpful because we will be concerned with the inverse of this matrix later on. The total internal demand for any economy is equal to the sum of the rows of the economies input-output matrix. The I th entry of the internal demand vector is generated by the following: This results in the internal demand vector. a i1 + a i2 +... + a in = d i (3) d 2. Internal Demand V ector =. d i. d n So for the previous example the input-output matrix and internal demand vector are: d 1 Simplified Input Output Matrix A = From \To Agg M anu Labor Demand V ector Agg 40+ 20+ 40 = 100 M anu 20+ 20+ 40 = 80 Labor 40+ 200+ 80 = 320 These matrices shows the flow of goods between industries, however we are left with no information on the relative size of these industries in terms of currency. If we know the value or the average value of the goods that are being produced we can create a matrix that will transform the input-output matrix into one where the amount of good being consumed by each sector of the economy is measured in terms of currency instead of goods. To do this construct a diagonal matrix where the each entry is the price of the goods that the corresponding industry produces. For example the entry a 11 is the price that the goods that industry S 1 porduce are valued at. (4) (5) 3

Price P S 1 P S 2... P S n P S 1 p 11 0... 0 P S 2 0 p 22... 0....... P S n 0 0... p nn After we have this matrix then multiply it by the input-output matrix. (6) p 11 0... 0 a 11 a 21... a 1n p 11 a 11 p 11 a 21... p 11 a 1n 0 p 22... 0 a 21 a 22... a 2n............ = p 22 a 21 p 22 a 22... p 22 a 2n...... 0 0... p nn a n1 a n2... a nn p nn a n1 p nn a n2... p nn a nn (7) Now for the simplified example the price of one unit of agricultural goods is ten dollars, the price of one unit of manufacturing goods is twenty dollars, and finally the price of one unit of labor services is worth five dollars. So the price and input-output matrices for the example are: 10 0 0 V alue Matrix = 0 20 0 (8) 0 0 5 40 20 40 Input Output Matrix = 20 20 40 (9) 40 200 80 Now we multiple the price matrix by the input-output matrix. 10 0 0 40 20 40 400 200 400 0 20 0 20 20 40 = 400 400 800 (10) 0 0 5 40 200 80 200 1000 400 400 200 400 V alue Input Output Matrix = 400 400 800 (11) 200 1000 400 Now the internal demand vector in terms of currency instead of goods. Simplified V alue MatrixA = From \To Agg M anu Labor Internal Demand V ector Agg 400+ 200+ 400 = 1000 M anu 400+ 400+ 800 = 1600 Labor 200+ 1000+ 400 = 1600 (12) 4

So while in terms of the number of goods sold the agricultural and manufacturing look relatively similar, in terms of the amount of value the manufacturing sector is a good deal larger than the agricultural sector. In recent years the number of sectors that define the sectors in the economy has increased exponentially. As of 2006 more detailed tables had over one thousand different sectors making well over one million entries. Suppose in addition to the internal demand, which models the flow of goods and services exchanges in between the industries, there is also a sector of the economy called does not produce anything but consumes good and services from all sectors. This sector is called the open sector. Let some vector f be called a final demand vector, and let it be equal to the total demand of the nonproductive sectors of the economy. Also lets define an vector x is the total amount produced. Then it stands that: Amount P roduced = x [ ] Internal Demand F inal + Demand f (13) For the example suppose a final demand vector of : 600 F inaldemand = 800 (14) 400 Then the totals for this economy would be Amount 1000 600 P roduced = 1600 + 800 (15) x 1600 400 1600 = 2400 (16) 2000 More generally these amounts are x 1, x 2,... x n. Where the x j corresponds to industry S j. 3. Technical Coefficients and Structural and Consumption Matrices A structural matrix is one composed of technical coefficients. Technical coefficients demonstrate the amount of a good i per unit of good j produced that is consumed. A general example of a technical coefficient c ij is computed by dividing the a ij entry in the input-output matrix (fig 1) by the total of the good demanded, expressed as x j (fig 16). This is also known as the input coefficient. c ij = a ij x j (17) So the structural matrix of the input-output matrix of (fig 2) follows: 5

Simplif iedstructuralm atrixa = From \To Agg M anu Labor Agg 40/160 20/120 40/400 M anu 20/160 20/120 40/400 Labor 40/160 200/120 80/400 (18) From \To Agg M anu Labor Agg.25.167.1 M anu.125.167.1 Labor.25 1.667.2 Simplif iedstructuralm atrixa = (19) In practice most structural matrices are constructed in terms of dollars rather then of goods. However it is important to remember the basis for this analysis is founded on the flow of goods through an economy, not the flow of money. When the structural matrix is composed of technical coefficients derived from the monetary value ratio rather than the ratio of goods the matrix is often called a consumption matrix. An example of the consumption matrix is below. From \To Agg M anu Labor Agg.25.083.2 M anu.25.167.4 Labor.125.4167.2 Simplif iedconsumptionm atrixa = (20) The sum of the columns of the consumption matrix can display certain traits of the economy in which the system is operating. If the sum of the columns is less then one this means that one unit of the good takes costs less to produce and sell then the value it sell for. Thus the company making the product is profiting. If the sum of the columns equals one that means the final product takes exactly the amount of currency it takes to produce that the product sells for. Therefore the company is breaking even. If the sum of the columns is greater then one this means that it costs more to produce one unit of the good then it does to make. Thus the producing company is incurring a loss. 4. Final Demand, Amount Produced, and Unit Consumption Vectors. Going back to figure 13. 6

Amount P roduced = x [ ] Internal Demand F inal + Demand (21) f As was noted previously, each column in A represents the the amount of goods consumed by a sector. Let each column in the consumption matrix be called a unit consumption vector. Thus unit consumption vector also represents the the amount of inputs needed to produce on unit of a good. Denote these vectors as c 1, c 2,... c n. Simplif ied Consumption M atrixa = From \To Agg M anu Labor Agg.25.083.2 M anu.25.167.4 Labor.125.4167.2 (22) c 1 c 2 c 3 (23) The market changes and this year the Manufacturing Sector decides to produce 2600 dollars worth of goods, lets call this x. Then using the manufacturing unit consumption vector we get the amount of inputs needed..083 200 x 2 c 2 = 2400.167 = 400 (24).4167 1000 So this tells us from the consumption matrix how many inputs are needed for the manufacturing sector of this economy to produce 2400 dollars worth of goods. This matches above. let x, as mentioned above be the total amount of all goods demands. Therefore if each sector of the economy, S 1... S n, decide to produce x 1... x n amount of good than the internal demand is given by. Internal Demand = x 1 c 1 + x 2 c 2 +... + x n c n (25) Where the consumption matrix = C = [ c 1, c 2,..., c n ] These equations yield Leontiff s Input-Output Model. Note that this is the same value as the Value Demand Vector as before, however we will rarely use the previous notation. 5. The Leontiff Input-Output Model, or Production Equation 7

Therefore Amount P roduced = [ Cx ] F inal + Demand (26) x f Using the algebraic properties of R n x = Cx + f (27) Ix = Cx + f (28) Ix Cx = f (29) (I C)x = f (30) A consumption matrix is considered economically feasible if the sum of any column of C is less then 1. Then the next theorem follows: Let C be the consumption matrix for an economy, and let f the final demand. If C and f have nonnegative entries, and if C is economically feasible, then the inverse of the matrix (I-C) exists and the production vector: x = (I C) 1 f (31) has nonnegative entries and is the unique solution of x = Cx + f (32) To see why this is true, let the final demand presented to companies at the beginning of the year be f. Thus the industries will respond by setting their output, x, at: x = f (33) This will exactly meet final demand. To produce the final demand, each industry places out orders for raw materials, labor, or other inputs. This creates the internal demand. The additional demand is Cf, and thus will need additional inputs given by C(Cf) = C 2 f (34) This creates a second round of internal demand, so industries buy more, which creates more internal demand: C(C 2 f) = C 3 f (35) 8

And so on. While it would seem that this process would continue indefinitely in reel life C m approaches the 0 matrix quickly. We can model this process by the equation equation: Thus x = f + Cf + C 2 f + C 2 f + C 2 f +... + C m 1 f + C m f (36) x = (I + CI + C 2 I + C 2 I + C 2 I +... + C m 1 I + C m I)f (37) The we use the algebraic identity: (I C)(I + C + C 2 + C 3 +... + C m ) = I C m+1 (38) Since C m approaches the zero matrix we know (I C m+1 ) approaches I as m get arbitrarily large. Therefore Therefore (I C) 1 = (I + C + C 2 + C 3 +... + C m ) (39) x = (I C) 1 f (40) 6. The Importance (I C) 1 (I C) 1 is very important because its entries provide information on how the production, x, will change when the final demand, f, changes. For example take our simplified economy from the previous example. We have the consumption matrix give by figure (20). Therefore (I-C) is: 1 0 0.25.083.2.75.083.2 = (41) 0 1 0 0 0 1 Thus (I C) 1 is:.25.167.4.125.4167.2. 25.833.4.125.4167.8 1.6.479.6396.8 1.841 1.121 (42).667 1.03 1.9335 Suppose the final demand from the open sector increases is the same as before. This gives us a demand of: 800 F inaldemand = 1000 (43) 600 So the final production, x, is for this economy is: x = (I C) 1 f (44) 9

1.6.479.6396 600 x =.8 1.841 1.121 800 (45).667 1.03 1.9335 400 x = 1600 2400 (46) 2000. So to satisfy both final and internal demand for this economy the agricultural sector would have to produce 1600 units of currency worth of goods. The manufacturing sector would have to produce 2400 unit of currency worth of goods. Finally the labor sector would have to produce 2000 units of currency worth of goods. From this point is it very easy to get back to internal demand. We use the equation given in figure 21: Amount [ ] F inal P roduced Internal = + Demand (47) Demand x f Therefore: [ ] Internal = Amount P roduced Demand x [ ] Internal = Demand [ ] Internal = Demand F inal Demand (48) f 1600 600 2400 800 (49) 2000 400 1000 1600 (50) 1600 This shows the (I C) 1 provides us with an unique solution to the problem of finding the total amount produced if the consumption matrix and final demand of an economy is already given. 7. In Closing There are other ways then those described above to reach certain values. For example the consumption matrix can be measured sector by sector and assembled instead of using technical coefficients. Similarly the value that economists are interested in is not always final amount of production. This basic inputoutput analysis however is a very powerful tool. As shown above it can predict what happens to an economy when final demand changes. By changing the consumption matrix this can represent what happens to an economy when the relative cost in terms of other goods (a change in one or more entries in internal demand) of producing one good can change both internal and final demand. 10

Also this can model what happens when companies decide to increase or decrease the price of a good in terms of currency. Another useful application of this set of equations is figuring out the GDP of an economy. The total demand, x, of all the sectors of an economy of a nation is equal to the GDP. Imports and export are handled by changing the final demand vector. In Closing this application of very basic concepts in linear algebra creates an incredibly powerful tool for the analysis of economies. Wessily Leontiff won the Nobel Prize in 1973 for his work in modernizing economics using these concepts. 11

Work Cited 1. Lay, David, C. Linear Algebra and it s Applications, Third Edition. New York: Pearson, 2006. 2. Leontiff, Wassily. Input-Output Economics, Second Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. 3. Sohn, Ira, eds. Readings in Input-Output Analysis: Theory and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. 12