Canada Nunavut Agreement on the Transfer of Federal Gas Tax Revenues under the New Deal for Cities and Communities

Similar documents
City of Charlottetown Wastewater Treatment Expansion & Upgrading

MEMORANDUM. Further discussion regarding the Community s solid waste facility is described further in this memorandum.

MBJ Environmental Programmes

Wastewater Regulation and Designing Changes in South East Asia

This fact sheet provides an overview of options for managing solid

ENVIRONMENTAL CODE OF PRACTICE FOR CONCRETE BATCH PLANT & ROCK WASHING OPERATIONS

Package Treatment Plant Policy and Procedure

Anish Jantrania (photo) and Allen Knapp

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

Application Form 2E. Facilities Which Do Not Discharge Process Wastewater

Improper storage of fuel on construction sites will increase the risk of water pollution that may occur as a result of leaks or spills.

On-site Treatmentt for Domestic Wastewater in Thailand Suwanna. K. Boontanon Mahidol Univ. 2

BP Texas City Refinery

Aquatera 2015/16 Business Plan Highlights

Biofiltra on: West Hylebos Log Yard

Environmental guidelines for preparation of an Environment Management Plan

septic systems What is a Septic System? How does a Septic System Work?

Alberta Environment Standards for Advanced Waste Systems

Who is responsible for making sure that wastewater is treated properly?

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

Councillor Barry Dalrymple, Chair, and Members of Environment & Sustainability Standing Committee original signed

SPILL PREVENTION PLAN

Cambridge Wastewater Treatment Facility

Notification Requirements for CMSA NPDES Permit Exceedances and Collection System Sanitary Sewer Overflows Date: April 2, 2008 (Revised July 10, 2012)

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY Environmental Self Audit For Small Businesses

Various Environmental Projects at Vanderbijlpark Works. December 2014

Pursuant to Department of Environmental Protection Rules Chapter 555, effective March 9, 2009

2006 Standard Application Processing Time. 10 months. 14 months

Environmental Management Plan

SECTION 1 UTILITY OVERVIEW, INTRODUCTION, and PROJECT BACKGROUND

On Site Sewage System Maintenance Inspections. March Building and Development Branch Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing

knk5 wmoep5 vtmpq NUNAVUT WATER BOARD NUNAVUT IMALIRIYIN

Environmental Guidelines for Preparation of an Environmental Management Plan

research highlight Remote Monitoring and Control of On-Site Wastewater Treatment, Recycling, and Reuse Systems

Civil Engineering Sector Labour-Management Health and Safety Committee

Center for Sustainable Business Growth

Wastewater(Solids(Management(( 2(Atlantic(Canada(Perspective( Dwayne(Doucette,(MASc.(P.Eng.((( June(19,(2013(

Town of New Castle Utility Department Introduction

Improving on-site domestic wastewater treatment systems - West Coast Lagoons Project

WASTEWATER TREATMENT OBJECTIVES

Waste Handling & Disposal

Guidance on applying for approval of installation of a commercial onsite wastewater system

Saudi Aramco Project Development

Examples of Eligible Projects. Project Category Description Examples

Victoria City 2010 Community Energy and Emissions Inventory Monitoring and reporting on progress towards greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets

Improper storage of potential pollutants will increase the risk of water pollution that may occur because of spills.

BY-LAW CONCERNING DISCHARGES AT PURIFICATION WORKS ON THE TERRITORY OF THE URBAN AGGLOMERATION OF MONTRÉAL

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

A Model Environmental Management System FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Q 4/17/13: Thank you for your quick response to our dated April 10, In looking over your comments, we have a few clarifying remarks.

CANADA-WIDE STRATEGY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER EFFLUENT Progress Report PN 1522 ISBN PDF

Department Business Plan. Utilities

Brewery Wastewater: 2010 Water and Wastewater Conference Page 1

TOWN OF LAKESHORE CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT FOR LAKESHORE EASTERN COMMUNITIES SEWAGE WORKS

Maine Department of Environmental Protection Program Guidance On Combined Sewer Overflow Facility Plans

The natural solution to wastewater treatment

COURSE # 343 UNIT # 1: ADVANTEX WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. What you will learn in this lesson. Introduction to the listing

OFFICE OF LICENSING & GUIDANCE

2x800 MW Thermal Power Project Near Village Paraspani, Tehsil Pathargama, Godda- District By Adani Power (Jharkhand) Limited

CREATING A GREEN FUTURE THROUGH WATER REMEDIATION

City of Mebane Wastewater Collection and Treatment Facility

TOWN OF ALTONA 2016 FINANCIAL PLAN

ADDENDUM TO THE FACT SHEET FOR NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT NO. WA June 25, 2010

Biogas as transportation fuel

Environmental Science 101 Waste. Fall Lecture Outline: Terms You Should Know: Learning Objectives: Reading Assignment: Chlorinated.

Township of Enniskillen. Asset Management Plan

Director of Utilities. Manager. Distribution Supervisor. Utilities Analyst. Account Clerk. Water. Conservation Specialist.

Electrical infrastructure serving the city of London CITY OF LONDON Corporate Energy Consumption Report

Chapter 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Park Operations

TOUR DE TABLE CANADA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Georgia Department of Public Health. Georgia Onsite Sewage Management Systems. Background and Use of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems in Georgia

This report will update Common Council on the Harbour Clean-Up Program.

CHAPTER 8 UPGRADING EXISTING TREATMENT FACILITIES

GUIDELINE FOR MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR STREET SWEEPINGS & CATCH BASIN CLEANINGS

HOW DOES THIS SERVICE CONTRIBUTE TO THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN THE CITY OF LONDON?

SEPTIC SYSTEMS. 1. Building sewer connects the building plumbing to the septic tank.

Experts Review of Aerobic Treatment Unit Operation and Maintenance. Bruce Lesikar Texas AgriLife Extension Service

THE NEW NSF 350 AND 350-1

Iron and Steel Manufacturing

MARICOPA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CODE CHAPTER II SEWAGE AND WASTES SECTION 8

Understanding and Living With Your Septic System

Environmental Law Enforcement in Zimbabwe. Farai Michael Nyahwa

Executive Summary. Purpose and Need for Project. Background Work

The City of Boulder 75 th Street Wastewater Treatment Facility

Total Suspended Solids: The Hows & Whys of Controlling Runoff Pollution

Bay Park Sewage Treatment Plant Super Storm Sandy Recovery

Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc. Mark J. Quimby Project Consultant

Birmingham City University / Students Union Aspects and Impacts Register. Waste. Impacts description

K A N S A S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RECLAMATION FACILITY. 1. Applicant's Name

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES

'A GREASE TRAP TREATMENT PERFECT FOR RESTAURANT GREASE TRAPS. RESTAURANTS WILL SAVE BIG MONEY ON GREASE TRAP MAINTENANCE.'

What Is An On-Lot Sewage Disposal System?

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

Water Resource Management Planning

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD CENTRAL VALLEY REGION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM NO. R NPDES NO.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BATNEEC GUIDANCE NOTE. Class 4.1 PROCESSING OF ASBESTOS AND THE MANUFACTURE AND PROCESSING OF ASBESTOS BASED PRODUCTS

Septic System Owner s Manual

Number September 2014 SEWER LIABILITY

Routine Maintenance and Inspection

Transcription:

Canada Nunavut Agreement on the Transfer of Federal Gas Tax Revenues under the New Deal for Cities and Communities 2005 2015 Nunavut Outcomes Report 30 th September, 2009

Contents Page Executive Summary iii 1. Introduction 1.1 Gas Tax Funds 1 1.2 Public Transit Funds 2 2. Outcomes Report: Gas Tax Projects 3 2.1 Hall Beach Sewage Lagoon Decommissioning 3 2.2 Coral Harbour Sewage Lagoon/Wetland 4 2.3 Arctic Bay Power Supply 4 2.4 Kimmirut Power Supply 5 2.5 City of Iqaluit: Sewage Lift Station 5 2.6 City of Iqaluit: Sludge Management Project 6 3. Outcomes Report: Public Transit Projects 3.1 Runway Stabilization Projects 8 Conclusions 9 ii

Executive Summary Introduced in 2005 by the Federal Government, the Gas Tax Fund (GTF) and Public Transit Fund (PTF) were designed to provide reliable, multi-year funding for communities to undertake infrastructure initiatives to help produce the shared national outcomes of cleaner air, cleaner water and reduced green house gas (GHG) emissions. The scope of GTF funding is aligned with the infrastructure needs of Nunavut, and this funding has been targeted specifically towards projects emphasizing improvements to water, wastewater and solid waste. With the additional provisions announced in the 2008 Gas Tax Extension Agreement, Nunavut s total contribution of Gas Tax funds is $97.5 M, until the end of the Agreement in 2015. Since the inception of GTF, Nunavut has initiated over 30 infrastructure projects. As of September 30 th, 2009, 6 GTF projects have been completed four directly administered by the Government of Nunavut (GN), and two administered by the City of Iqaluit. The PTF Agreement has allocated $370,621 of per-capita Federal funding to Nunavut for improvements to public transit infrastructure. To promote outcomes of cleaner air, PTF funds have been used for runway stabilization projects in four communities, helping reduce the amount of air particulates (dust) generated during airplane movements. Three of these projects have now been completed. The outcome of the completed projects demonstrates Nunavut s commitment to fulfilling the objectives of the Gas Tax and Public Transit Funds. With more than 30 projects initiated to-date, and more projects planned in the coming fiscal years, GTF provides Nunavut with the reliable infrastructure funding needed for sustainable community growth. iii

1. Introduction 1.1 Gas Tax Funds On August 3, 2005, the Government of Nunavut (GN) and the Government of Canada entered into an Agreement for the transfer of $37.5 M as part of the Canada-Nunavut Agreement on the transfer of Federal Gas Tax Revenues 2005-2015 (Table 1). In the 2007 Federal Budget, Gas Tax Funding (GTF) was extended with the provision of an additional $60 M to Nunavut (Table 2), bringing the total portion of GTF funding for the Territory to $97.5 M through 2013-14. Table 1 Table 2 Gas Tax Contribution Agreement (2005-2015) Gas Tax Extension Agreement (2005 2015) Fiscal year Canada s Contribution 2005-2006 $4.5 M 2006-2007 $4.5 M 2007-2008 $6 M 2008-2009 $7.5 M 2009-2010 $15 M Total $37.5 M Fiscal year Canada s Contribution 2010-2011 $15 M 2011-2012 $15 M 2012-2013 $15 M 2013-2014 $15 M Total $60 M Gas Tax funds in Nunavut have been specifically targeted towards projects which emphasize improvements to water, wastewater and solid waste. Figure 1 shows the approximate distribution of projects that have been undertaken by Nunavut in each eligible category. These are critical infrastructure needs in Nunavut and are essential to future sustainable community growth. The scope of GTF funding is aligned with the infrastructure needs of Nunavut, helping to address the aging infrastructure, community expansion, and future economic development within the Territory. GTF enables the communities in Nunavut to make investments in infrastructure projects that address local needs and help produce the shared national outcomes for environmentally sustainable and productive communities. 1

~30% Wastewater ~28% Drinking Water ~42% Solid Waste Figure 1: Approximate distribution of Gas Tax projects in Nunavut as of September 30, 2009 under the eligible categories of drinking water, wastewater and solid waste infrastructure. 1.2 Public Transit Funds The Public Transit Fund (PTF) was designed and introduced by the Federal Government to address specific needs for improved public transit services across Canada. Funding was issued as a one-time contribution to each Province and Territory based on a percapita funding formula. On December 1 st, 2006, the Government of Nunavut signed the PTF Agreement transferring a total of $370,621 towards improving public transit in Nunavut. The territory of Nunavut, although comprising approximately one fifth the land mass of Canada, contains less than 0.1 percent of the national population. Unlike our Provincial counterparts in the South, large urban centers, that necessitate the need for public transit such as buses and subways, are not found in Nunavut. In fact, the majority of the communities in Nunavut have populations less than 1,000 people. These communities are often quite remote, separated by vast distances and frequently lack basic road paving. Given the small size and remoteness of communities in Nunavut, the primary mode of public transit is by air. Not only are airplanes relied upon heavily to transport people in and out of the communities, air transport is the most reliable and most utilized method of delivery for food and supplies, and is the sole means of delivery during the winter months. With such an emphasis on air transportation in Nunavut, improvements to airport infrastructure was identified as the main focus to utilize Public Transit Funds. 2

2. Outcomes Report: Gas Tax Funds As the primary Eligible Recipient of Gas Tax funds, the Government of Nunavut, through the Department of Community and Government Services (CGS) administers all infrastructure projects on behalf of the municipalities in Nunavut. These funds are allocated to eligible community projects which are then implemented directly by the GN. Under the Gas Tax Agreement, the City of Iqaluit, a tax-based municipality, is the only other Eligible Recipient. A Funding Agreement with the GN is in place that transfers Gas Tax funds directly to the City of Iqaluit, which in turn, allocates these funds and administers eligible community projects in their municipality. Since signing the Agreement in 2005, the GN has initiated more than thirty (30) infrastructure projects throughout the communities of Nunavut, with an additional two (2) projects undertaken by the City of Iqaluit. As of September 30 th, 2009, six (6) Gas Tax projects have been completed four directly administered by the GN and two by the City of Iqaluit (Table 3). Table 3. Completed GTF projects as of September 30, 2009 GN - GTF Projects Hall Beach Sewage Lagoon Decommissioning Coral Harbour Sewage Lagoon/Wetland Treatment System Arctic Bay power supply upgrade to water pump house Kimmirut power supply upgrade to water pump house City of Iqaluit - GTF Projects Sludge Management Project Upgrades to Sewage Lift Station #1 The following sections provide more detailed descriptions and performance indicators for the completed GTF projects listed in Table 3. 2.1 Hall Beach Sewage Lagoon Decommissioning With a new sewage lagoon operational in Hall Beach, the old sewage lagoon had to be decommissioned to meet environmental regulations and obligations of the water license. Prior to decommissioning, the old lagoon had numerous health and safety concerns. Insufficient cover and lack of fencing around the old lagoon posed a significant risk to passersby, and the inside of the old lagoon contained contaminated soil/sediment. In 2005, a decommissioning project was initiated to restore the old lagoon to its natural vegetative state, minimizing health and safety concerns and fulfilling obligations to the water license. The project entailed remediation of the soil/sediment followed by filling 3

and compacting with gravel. The project was complete in the spring of 2008, resulting in improvement of water/land quality and restoration of the area. 2.2 Coral Harbour Sewage Lagoon/Wetland The Coral Harbour Sewage Lagoon/Wetland treatment project was identified for GTF funding in May 2005. The scope of this project involved modifications to the surrounding natural tundra wetlands to address issues with leaking in the existing sewage lagoon. Table 4 provides several parameters of effluent quality from the wetland, measured pre- and post-construction. A discernable improvement is seen in levels of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), indicating an enhancement in the quality of effluent produced. Additionally, a drastic decrease in the total suspended solids (TSS) and number of fecal coliforms demonstrates that the wastewater is being effectively treated, resulting in the release of cleaner water into the surrounding environment. Table 4. Measured parameters of effluent quality from the Coral Harbour Sewage lagoon/wetland Project Title: Coral Harbour Sewage Lagoon Effluent Quality Prior to Construction* After Construction BOD [mg/l] 120 <6 TSS [mg/l] 100 <5 Fecal Coliforms CFU/ dl >110,000 930 Oils and Grease (mg/l) 21 <1 ph 7.4 8 *Pre-construction values were measured at the discharge from the leak location 2.3 Arctic Bay Power Supply Prior to renovations of the water truck fill station in Arctic Bay, the building was powered entirely using a diesel generator. In 2008, over 35,000 L of diesel fuel was consumed for the daily operation of the station. Not only did the use of a diesel generator contribute to high operation and maintenance costs, but the burning of diesel fuel released GHG emissions to the environment. To minimize these impacts, power lines were run to the truck fill station to connect to the local power grid providing the community with reliable, cost efficient and cleaner energy to operate the station. The diesel generators will be kept onsite as a backup system to allow operation in the event of power outages. In light of rising fuel costs, switching to the power grid is estimated to reduce the communities operation and maintenance costs by 50%. More importantly, decommissioning the inefficient diesel generator significantly reduces the GHG emissions entering the environment, providing cleaner air for the community. 4

2.4 Kimmirut Power Supply The scope of the Kimmirut Power Supply project was similar to the one initiated in Arctic Bay. The truck fill station in Kimmirut was powered entirely by a diesel generator. Approximately 33,500 L of diesel fuel was consumed in 2008 at a substantial cost to the community, both financially and environmentally. Connecting to the local power grid is estimated to save the community over 50% annually in operation and maintenance costs and provide cleaner air for the entire community. The generator will continue to be kept onsite as a backup power supply in the event of power outages. 2.5 City of Iqaluit: Sewage Lift Station In summer 2005, construction began to upgrade sewage lift station #1 in the City of Iqaluit. At that time, the station was operating with 30 year old pumps that worked by air switches. With little internal control, these pumps would operate at 100% capacity regardless of the demand. Upgrades in 2005 replaced the old pumps with new Variable Frequency Drives (VFD). Currently, there are two VFD pumps operating at 50% capacity at the station, producing a reduced demand on resources, lowering operation costs, and allowing future growth within the municipality. Figure 2: City of Iqaluit, Lift Station #1 5

Further upgrades to the facility included the installation of backup and safety systems, mainly as preventative measures to ensure environmental spills and clogged systems were minimized. A new backup generator and alarm system were installed to ensure the lift station would remain online during a power shortage and also to allow problems with the lift station to be detected promptly, minimizing the risk of potential spills. A new macerator was installed to break down foreign matter entering the sewer system, helping prevent the underground sewer lines, pumps and equipment at the wastewater treatment plant from becoming clogged. Prior to the upgrades, four spills were recorded at the lift station, mainly the result of power failures. Since completion of the upgrades, only one spill has been recorded, and this spill only resulted due to severe weather when maintenance personnel could not attend to the station. These upgrades have significantly improved water service to the community and have minimized spills to the surrounding environment. 2.6 City of Iqaluit: Sludge Management Project In 2006, The City of Iqaluit initiated a study to develop and implement technologies to address sludge management. A freeze/thaw, dewatering and composting project was developed and employed as a new sludge management/treatment process. Under the plan, a freeze/thaw technique was used to dewater the raw sewage sludge producing a much dryer sludge material that could be mixed with wood chips, piled in rows, and allowed to decompose into compost over the summer and winter months. The goal of the project was to effectively treat sludge before disposal, ensuring minimal risk to public health and the receiving environment. Sludge samples were tested at the start of the treatment process in 2006, and compost samples were tested at the end of the treatment process in 2008. Measured parameters of sludge and compost quality are shown in Table 5. Table 5. Comparison of measured compost and sludge quality parameters before and after implementation of the treatment process. Compost Parameter Unit Sludge (2006) (2008) Water % 32.1 80.2 Solids % 67.4 17.6 Oil (dry wt.) % 0.68 11 Oil (wet wt.) % 0.46 2.16 Total Coliforms MPN/g <3 >1,100,000 Fecal Coliforms MPN/g <3 >1,100,000 Solids (wet wt.)/total Solids % 55.7 19.5 Soil ph 7.4 5.6 BOD (extractable) mg/kg 3400 39500 *MPN = Most Probable Number 6

Tests indicate that the treated compost material had drastically reduced levels of total and fecal coliforms, as well as reduced levels of extractable BOD. These levels fall within US EPA sewage sludge use and disposal standards and are suitable for use as a cover material for the landfill. By using the treated compost instead of conventional granular material for landfill cover, it is estimated that the City of Iqaluit will save over $40 per cubic meter in landfill maintenance. Supplementary to the cost savings, the sludge program has directly led to the implementation of technologies to improve solid waste management within the community and provide a cleaner living environment for residents. 7

3. Outcomes Report: Public Transit Funds 3.1 Runway Stabilization Projects Airports in many communities in Nunavut employ gravel runway surfaces. These surfaces are often in close proximity to the communities they serve and typically produce a considerable amount of air-borne particulates (dust) during aircraft landing and takeoff. This is especially evident in the drier summer months where no snow cover is present. In May 2008, identical runway stabilization projects were initiated in four (4) communities in Nunavut Pond Inlet, Repulse Bay, Cambridge Bay and Kimmirut. Each project entailed the application of dust suppressant/aggregate stabilizer material on the gravel runway surfaces. With the exception of Cambridge Bay, where there was a delay in the delivery of materials and supplies, the projects in the remaining communities were completed by the end of August 2009. The application of runway stabilization material substantially improved air quality in these communities, reducing the amount of atmospheric particulates (dust) produced during airplane movements. Additionally, the treatment of the runway surfaces prolongs the useful life cycle of the runways, reducing the need for further maintenance in the future. 8

4. Conclusions The infrastructure found in the majority of communities in Nunavut are beyond their useful lifecycle and many are inefficient, expensive to operate, and potentially hazardous to the community and the environment. These deficiencies are particularly evident in critical components such as water, wastewater, and solid waste infrastructure, where renovations/repairs are desperately needed to keep pace with expanding communities. GTF and PTF have provided reliable, multi-year Federal funding to target the aging infrastructure in Nunavut. These funds have been implemented by the GN specifically towards environmentally sustainable projects, with the goal of achieving cleaner communities through improvements in drinking water, efficient wastewater treatment, and reliable solid waste disposal. With the extension of the Federal Gas Tax program, communities in Nunavut will receive an additional $60 M of funding over the next four fiscal years (2010 2014). These funds will continue to be used to meet the GN s mandate of providing environmentally sustainable infrastructure for all communities ensuring reliable services for the health and safety of all citizens in Nunavut. The outcome of completed projects to date shows the GN s commitment to enhance the shared national outcomes of cleaner air, cleaner water and reduced GHG emissions throughout the Territory. With over 30 water, wastewater, and solid waste projects initiated as of September 2009, GTF and PTF have provided Nunavut with the opportunity to improve critical infrastructure, ensuring future sustainable growth in its communities. 9