St. Louis Public Schools MISSOURI. Number of Students 41,852 40, , ,905. Percent Free & Reduced Price Lunch Eligible

Similar documents
South Dakota DOE Report Card

South Dakota DOE Report Card

How To Improve Your School Performance

Understanding Ohio s New Local Report Card System

New York State Profile

Allen Elementary School

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 19, 2012 Contact: Jim Polites

College Enrollment, Persistence, and Graduation: Statewide Results

2. The AEC must be identified in AskTED (the Texas School Directory database) as an alternative campus.

IHE Master's Performance Report

Youngstown State University Associate's Degrees Awarded by Term and Ethnicity

Youngstown State University Bachelor's Degrees Awarded by Term and Ethnicity

Charter Schools in New Jersey. Interim Report

National Medicare Readmission. Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Bryan Middle School. Bryan Middle School. Not Actual School Data. 100 Central Dr Anywhere, DE (555) Administration.

State of New Jersey OVERVIEW WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL SCHOOL WARREN 1500 ROUTE 57 WARREN COUNTY VOCATIONAL

Improving K-8 Mathematics Achievement in the Anchorage School District

District: LITTLESTOWN AREA SD AUN: Test Date: PSSA Spring English Language Arts. Mathematics Science

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

The Impact of Bilingual Education on English Language Acquisition Rates for English Language Learners, Including Exceptionalities. Dr.

State of New Jersey

ARIZONA SCHOOL REPORT CARD ACADEMIC YEAR


The Math TLC Master s in Mathematics for Secondary Teachers Program

EXPEDITIONARY LEARNING SCHOOL PERFORMANCE. Expeditionary Learning 2010

K12 Virtual Academies February 4, 2014

Bangor Central Elementary School Annual Education Report

IHE Master's Performance Report

Dr. Nancy Mosbaek Doctorate in Nursing Scholarship APPLICATION

New Jersey Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL) 2015 Alumni Survey Results

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN ARIZONA. credo.stanford.edu.

Template for Local Grantee Evaluations ISBE 21st Century Community Learning Center Program. II. Overview and History of Program

Educational Technology in U.S. Public Schools: Fall 2008

How To Ask A School Administrator A Question About Your School

OFFICE SPACE FOR LEASE

Huntsville City. Superintendent Dr. Ann R. Moore

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

2009 CREDO Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) Stanford University Stanford, CA June 2009

MCA Data Discoveries

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools State

Transitioning English Language Learners in Massachusetts: An Exploratory Data Review. March 2012

Carl Perkins IV State Report

Completing Your Data File For Direct Online Enrollment

High School Graduation Rates in Maryland Technical Appendix

Methodology, business rules, and data components used in the implementation of the Washington State Equity Plan, 2015

Richardson ISD Fast Facts

SECTION 1. Participation in Education

BORALLY CATERING FOR LEASE

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

U.S. Department of Education November No Child Left Behind Blue Ribbon Schools Program Cover Sheet

Texas Education Agency Federal Report Card for Texas Public Schools

DATA COACHING WORKSHOP DAY 1 PRESENTED BY SARITA SIQUEIROS THORNBURG, JILL PATNODE & KRISSY SOLTMAN

Enrollment Application Inventory

NCES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

High School Graduation and the No Child Left Behind Act

2013 New Jersey Alternate Proficiency Assessment. Executive Summary

State of New Jersey

Analysis of. All Courses ( ) CRC Research Office October 2011

Total Males Females (0.4) (1.6) Didn't believe entitled or eligible 13.0 (0.3) Did not know how to apply for benefits 3.4 (0.

YEAR 3 REPORT: EVOLUTION OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT ALBANY NY CHARTER SCHOO CHARTER SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN FLORIDA. credo.stanford.edu.

College Affordability Diagnosis. Technical Report. William R. Doyle. Darcie Harvey

THE ROAD MAP PROJECT South Seattle Public Schools DISTRICT REPORT

Statistical Profile of the Miami- Dade County Public Schools

TEXAS ENGINEERING FOUNDATION Scholarship Application for Graduating Texas High School Seniors

Teacher Exit Survey (TEx S)

MEDICAL ASSISTANT APPLICATION

2015 TN Accountability Protocol

The New York State Report Card

School District of New Richmond 701 East Eleventh Street New Richmond, WI Fax

State of New Jersey

Clever SFTP Instructions

Campus Data Packet OTTO M. FRIDIA, JR. ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL. for Plans. School Number 27

Data Center --> County Data: Education

ZERO ROBOTICS APPLICATION

Just The Beginning A Pipeline Organization Summer Legal Institute D.C.-Maryland-Virginia

District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced) State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)

VCCS Report on High Performance Metrics Data for Achieve 2015 Goals within VCCS

IHE Master's Performance Report

BEATING THE ODDS. Overview. September 23, Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. Educating Georgia s Future gadoe.

How To Pass The Bill Of Rights In Illinois

Cardiff Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

Who is Aurora? Supplement A: Education. An Overview of demographic and social data and trends

Campus Data Packet OTTO M. FRIDIA, JR. ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL. for Plans. School Number 27

Rhode Island Department of Education Office of Student, Community and Academic Supports School Support System Report and Support Plan

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

New Jersey High School Performance Ranking - A Summary

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

LINCOLN SCHOOL DISTRICT th Street Calumet City, Illinois

IHE Master's Performance Report

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS SCHOOL REPORT CARD

School Counseling and College and Career Readiness Board of Regents Meeting October 2013

Florida. Who attends Florida's public schools? Total Public Elementary and Secondary Enrollment: 2,643,347

What is the Education Research & Data Center?

Bowler School District Bowler, Wisconsin. First-Year Report: Fall 2005 Data

School Accountability Report

Transcription:

Public Schools 2000-2001 2005-2006 2000-2001 2005-2006 Number of Students 41,852 40,841 903,542 917,905 Percent Free & Reduced Price Lunch Eligible 79 74 35 39 Percent of Students with Individual Educational Plans 17 17 15 14 Percent of 6 7 1 2 Percent American Indian/Alaskan Native 0 0 0 0 Percent Asian/Pacific Islander 1 2 1 2 Percent African American 85 80 18 18 Percent Hispanic 1 2 2 3 Percent White 18 14 80 77 Number of FTE Teachers 3,306 3,100 65,053 66,659 Student-Teacher Ratio 13 13 14 14 Number of Schools 120 103 2,368 2,361 District as a Percentage of the State's Public Schools 2000-2001 2005-2006 Percent of Students 5 4 Percent of FRPL 10 8 Percent of IEPs 5 5 Percent of ELLs 24 15 Percent of Schools 5 4 Percent of Teachers 5 5 DEMOGRAPHICS NOTES: Sources: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data, "Public Elementary/Secondary School Universe Survey" and "Local Education Agency Universe Survey." (All data are labeled preliminary by NCES.) ASSESSMENT NOTES: Test(s): Assessment Program Grades: 3-8, 10 & 11 How Reported: Below Basic, Basic, Proficient, and Advanced. 0

Assessment Program Reading Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Reading Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 3 3 At or Above Proficient 26 25-1.0 At or Above Proficient 43 44 1.0 Below Basic 21 23 2.0 Below Basic 9 9 0.0 At or Above Proficient NA NA NA NA NA 23 21-2.0 At or Above Proficient NA NA NA NA NA 45 46 1.0 Below Basic NA NA NA NA NA 26 31 5.0 Below Basic NA NA NA NA NA 11 10-1.0 5 5 At or Above Proficient 21 22 1.0 At or Above Proficient 46 49 3.0 Below Basic 23 24 1.0 Below Basic 9 8-1.0 6 6 At or Above Proficient 16 17 1.0 At or Above Proficient 43 44 1.0 Below Basic 37 34-3.0 Below Basic 12 11-1.0 7 7 At or Above Proficient 15 20 5.0 At or Above Proficient 46 2.0 Below Basic 36 34-2.0 Below Basic 14 13-1.0 At or Above Proficient NA NA NA NA NA 16 15-1.0 At or Above Proficient NA NA NA NA NA 43 43 0.0 Below Basic NA NA NA NA NA 26 28 2.0 Below Basic NA NA NA NA NA 9 9 0.0 9 9 10 10 11 11 At or Above Proficient 18 16-2.0 At or Above Proficient 43 42-1.0 Below Basic 29 28-1.0 Below Basic 10 10 0.0

Assessment Program Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 3 3 At or Above Proficient 24 20-4.0 At or Above Proficient 46 2.0 Below Basic 20 25 5.0 Below Basic 7 7 0.0 At or Above Proficient NA NA NA NA NA 20 15-5.0 At or Above Proficient NA NA NA NA NA 45 1.0 Below Basic NA NA NA NA NA 24 30 6.0 Below Basic NA NA NA NA NA 0.0 5 5 At or Above Proficient 22 19-3.0 At or Above Proficient 47 3.0 Below Basic 23 26 3.0 Below Basic 0.0 6 6 At or Above Proficient 14 18 4.0 At or Above Proficient 45 49 4.0 Below Basic 39 35-4.0 Below Basic 11 11 0.0 7 7 At or Above Proficient 12 17 5.0 At or Above Proficient 46 2.0 Below Basic 48 44-4.0 Below Basic 18 17-1.0 At or Above Proficient NA NA NA NA NA 13 13 0.0 At or Above Proficient NA NA NA NA NA 41 42 1.0 Below Basic NA NA NA NA NA 56 52-4.0 Below Basic NA NA NA NA NA 21 22 1.0 9 9 10 10 At or Above Proficient 13 15 2.0 At or Above Proficient 42 41-1.0 Below Basic 61 55-6.0 Below Basic 24 24 0.0 11 11

Assessment Program Reading Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 AT OR ABOVE PROFICIENT 4 AT OR ABOVE PROFICIENT 4 African-American 21 18-3.0 African-American 17 13-4.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 24 30 6.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 30 30 0.0 Hispanic 29 14-15.0 Hispanic 24 19-5.0 White 35 37 2.0 White 36 25-11.0 African-American 25 26 1.0 African-American 22 22 0.0 Alaskan Native/Am. Indian 39 42 3.0 Alaskan Native/Am. Indian 42 41-1.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 52 54 2.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 59 62 3.0 Hispanic 32 33 1.0 Hispanic 33 34 1.0 White 50 51 1.0 White 50 51 1.0 African-American (D)-White (S) -29-33 -4.0 African-American (D)-White (S) -33-38 -5.0 Hispanic (D)-White (S) -21-37 -16.0 Hispanic (D)-White (S) -26-32 -6.0 BELOW BASIC 4 BELOW BASIC 4 African-American 27 32 5.0 African-American 25 33 8.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 13 20 7.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 15 23 8.0 Hispanic 21 25 4.0 Hispanic 15 16 1.0 White 19 24 5.0 White 20 20 0.0 African-American 20 21 1.0 African-American 19 20 1.0 Alaskan Native/Am. Indian 12 12 0.0 Alaskan Native/Am. Indian 9 8-1.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 8 9 1.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 5 5 0.0 Hispanic 15 16 1.0 Hispanic 11 11 0.0 White 0.0 White 6 5-1.0 African-American (D)-White (S) 19 24 5.0 African-American (D)-White (S) 19 28 9.0 Hispanic (D)-White (S) 13 17 4.0 Hispanic (D)-White (S) 9 11 2.0

Assessment Program Achievement ( Subgroup vs ) Reading Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 AT OR ABOVE PROFICIENT 8 AT OR ABOVE PROFICIENT 8 African-American 13 11-2.0 African-American 9 10 1.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 32 49 17.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 30 36 6.0 Hispanic 22 16-6.0 Hispanic 20 9-11.0 White 34 30-4.0 White 32 30-2.0 African-American 18 19 1.0 African-American 14 15 1.0 Alaskan Native/Am. Indian 36 37 1.0 Alaskan Native/Am. Indian 40 36-4.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 55 55 0.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 59 61 2.0 Hispanic 28 30 2.0 Hispanic 28 29 1.0 White 49 49 0.0 White 47 48 1.0 African-American (D)-White (S) -36-38 -2.0 African-American (D)-White (S) -38-38 0.0 Hispanic (D)-White (S) -27-33 -6.0 Hispanic (D)-White (S) -27-39 -12.0 BELOW BASIC 8 BELOW BASIC 8 African-American 27 30 3.0 African-American 60 56-4.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 18 11-7.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 28 15-13.0 Hispanic 28 16-12.0 Hispanic 45 47 2.0 White 17 21 4.0 White 33 35 2.0 African-American 20 19-1.0 African-American 48 46-2.0 Alaskan Native/Am. Indian 13 10-3.0 Alaskan Native/Am. Indian 24 27 3.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 7 6-1.0 Asian/Pacific Islander 13 11-2.0 Hispanic 17 13-4.0 Hispanic 31 30-1.0 White 6 6 0.0 White 15 15 0.0 African-American (D)-White (S) 21 24 3.0 African-American (D)-White (S) 45 41-4.0 Hispanic (D)-White (S) 22 10-12.0 Hispanic (D)-White (S) 30 32 2.0

Assessment Program Achievement ( Subgroup vs ) Reading Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 At or Above Proficient 4 At or Above Proficient 4 FRPL 20 19-1.0 FRPL 19 13-6.0 FRPL 31 33 2.0 FRPL 31 31 0.0 Below Basic 4 Below Basic 4 FRPL 26 32 6.0 FRPL 26 32 6.0 FRPL 16 16 0.0 FRPL 13 13 0.0 At or Above Proficient 8 At or Above Proficient 8 FRPL 13 13 0.0 FRPL 10 12 2.0 FRPL 27 27 0.0 FRPL 24 26 2.0 Below Basic 8 Below Basic 8 FRPL 25 29 4.0 FRPL 57 53-4.0 FRPL 15 14-1.0 FRPL 5 33 33 0.0

Assessment Program Reading Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Reading Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 At or Above Proficient 12 11-1.0 At or Above Proficient 20 20 0.0 Below Basic 38 35-3.0 Below Basic 25 25 0.0 At or Above Proficient 11 16 5.0 At or Above Proficient 13 12-1.0 Below Basic 44 30-14.0 Below Basic 32 27-5.0 4 At or Above Proficient 10 11 1.0 At or Above Proficient 4 Below Basic 38 34-4.0 Below Basic 25 26 1.0 18 19 1.0 At or Above Proficient 13 10-3.0 At or Above Proficient Below Basic 60 51-9.0 Below Basic 19 17-2.0 45 46 1.0 Reading Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Reading Grade 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 At or Above Proficient 7 7 0.0 At or Above Proficient 22 24 2.0 Below Basic 57 64 7.0 Below Basic 34 33-1.0 At or Above Proficient 3 3 0.0 At or Above Proficient 11 11 0.0 Below Basic 57 62 5.0 Below Basic 37 37 0.0 At or Above Proficient 10 8-2.0 At or Above Proficient 25 27 2.0 Below Basic 46 58 12.0 Below Basic 25 23-2.0 At or Above Proficient 6 5-1.0 At or Above Proficient 13 14 1.0 Below Basic 77 80 3.0 Below Basic 57 57 0.0