Dynamics and Control of an Elastic Dumbbell Spacecraft in a Central Gravitational Field

Similar documents
Dynamics and Control of an Elastic Dumbbell Spacecraft in a Central Gravitational Field

AMIT K. SANYAL Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Date of completion:

Spacecraft Dynamics and Control. An Introduction

APPLIED MATHEMATICS ADVANCED LEVEL

(Most of the material presented in this chapter is taken from Thornton and Marion, Chap. 7)

Orbits of the Lennard-Jones Potential

Physics 9e/Cutnell. correlated to the. College Board AP Physics 1 Course Objectives

Dynamics. Basilio Bona. DAUIN-Politecnico di Torino. Basilio Bona (DAUIN-Politecnico di Torino) Dynamics / 30

Halliday, Resnick & Walker Chapter 13. Gravitation. Physics 1A PHYS1121 Professor Michael Burton

Discrete mechanics, optimal control and formation flying spacecraft

G U I D E T O A P P L I E D O R B I T A L M E C H A N I C S F O R K E R B A L S P A C E P R O G R A M

Halliday, Resnick & Walker Chapter 13. Gravitation. Physics 1A PHYS1121 Professor Michael Burton

Kyu-Jung Kim Mechanical Engineering Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, U.S.A.

Prelab Exercises: Hooke's Law and the Behavior of Springs

Lecture L30-3D Rigid Body Dynamics: Tops and Gyroscopes

Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics

Sample Questions for the AP Physics 1 Exam

Lecture L22-2D Rigid Body Dynamics: Work and Energy

MODELLING A SATELLITE CONTROL SYSTEM SIMULATOR

PHYSICAL QUANTITIES AND UNITS

Physics Notes Class 11 CHAPTER 6 WORK, ENERGY AND POWER

Lecture L17 - Orbit Transfers and Interplanetary Trajectories

PS 320 Classical Mechanics Embry-Riddle University Spring 2010

Chapter. 4 Mechanism Design and Analysis

Weight The weight of an object is defined as the gravitational force acting on the object. Unit: Newton (N)

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.ed-ph] 14 Apr 2000

Figure Cartesian coordinate robot

DIRECT ORBITAL DYNAMICS: USING INDEPENDENT ORBITAL TERMS TO TREAT BODIES AS ORBITING EACH OTHER DIRECTLY WHILE IN MOTION

Name Class Date. true

Newton s Law of Universal Gravitation describes the attractive gravitational force that exists between any two bodies with the following equation:

Lecture L2 - Degrees of Freedom and Constraints, Rectilinear Motion

Rotation: Moment of Inertia and Torque

Assessment Plan for Learning Outcomes for BA/BS in Physics

When the fluid velocity is zero, called the hydrostatic condition, the pressure variation is due only to the weight of the fluid.

Orbital Mechanics. Angular Momentum

Lecture L5 - Other Coordinate Systems

Lab 7: Rotational Motion

State Newton's second law of motion for a particle, defining carefully each term used.

Lecture L29-3D Rigid Body Dynamics

Review D: Potential Energy and the Conservation of Mechanical Energy

Optimal Reconfiguration of Formation Flying Satellites

AP1 Oscillations. 1. Which of the following statements about a spring-block oscillator in simple harmonic motion about its equilibrium point is false?

Fluid Mechanics Prof. S. K. Som Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics. EM 311M - DYNAMICS Spring 2012 SYLLABUS

A = 6561 times greater. B. 81 times greater. C. equally strong. D. 1/81 as great. E. (1/81) 2 = 1/6561 as great.

Central configuration in the planar n + 1 body problem with generalized forces.

Midterm Solutions. mvr = ω f (I wheel + I bullet ) = ω f 2 MR2 + mr 2 ) ω f = v R. 1 + M 2m

Physics 2A, Sec B00: Mechanics -- Winter 2011 Instructor: B. Grinstein Final Exam

Torque Analyses of a Sliding Ladder

Differential Relations for Fluid Flow. Acceleration field of a fluid. The differential equation of mass conservation

Chapter 2. Derivation of the Equations of Open Channel Flow. 2.1 General Considerations

Mechanical Principles

A Bond Graph Approach for Modelling Systems of Rigid Bodies in Spatial Motion

Lecture 19: Planet Formation I. Clues from the Solar System

Orbital Dynamics of an Ellipsoidal Body

Chapter 4. Forces and Newton s Laws of Motion. continued

Conservation of Momentum and Energy

PHYS 1624 University Physics I. PHYS 2644 University Physics II

Centripetal Force. This result is independent of the size of r. A full circle has 2π rad, and 360 deg = 2π rad.

Salem Community College Course Syllabus. Course Title: Physics I. Course Code: PHY 101. Lecture Hours: 2 Laboratory Hours: 4 Credits: 4

Lecture 2. Marginal Functions, Average Functions, Elasticity, the Marginal Principle, and Constrained Optimization

Notes on Elastic and Inelastic Collisions

Physics 41 HW Set 1 Chapter 15

Notes: Most of the material in this chapter is taken from Young and Freedman, Chap. 13.

Physics 1A Lecture 10C

Force on Moving Charges in a Magnetic Field

Lecture 7 Formation of the Solar System. Nebular Theory. Origin of the Solar System. Origin of the Solar System. The Solar Nebula

Science Standard Articulated by Grade Level Strand 5: Physical Science

Testing dark matter halos using rotation curves and lensing

State Newton's second law of motion for a particle, defining carefully each term used.

Engineering g Problem Solving Process

Kinetic Theory & Ideal Gas

CHAPTER 2 ORBITAL DYNAMICS

Downloaded from

Penn State University Physics 211 ORBITAL MECHANICS 1

Work and Conservation of Energy

Copyright 2011 Casa Software Ltd. Centre of Mass

Lecture 3 Fluid Dynamics and Balance Equa6ons for Reac6ng Flows

Radiation reaction for inspiralling binary systems with spin-spin

Orbital Mechanics and Space Geometry

DYNAMICS OF A TETRAHEDRAL CONSTELLATION OF SATELLITES-GYROSTATS

Sound. References: L.D. Landau & E.M. Lifshitz: Fluid Mechanics, Chapter VIII F. Shu: The Physics of Astrophysics, Vol. 2, Gas Dynamics, Chapter 8

Families of symmetric periodic orbits in the three body problem and the figure eight

Candidate Number. General Certificate of Education Advanced Level Examination June 2010

THEORETICAL MECHANICS

KERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT CERRO COSO COLLEGE PHYS C111 COURSE OUTLINE OF RECORD

Symmetric planar non collinear relative equilibria for the Lennard Jones potential 3 body problem with two equal masses

Stability Analysis of Small Satellite Formation Flying and Reconfiguration Missions in Deep Space

Chapter #7 Giancoli 6th edition Problem Solutions

Presentation of problem T1 (9 points): The Maribo Meteorite

Free Fall: Observing and Analyzing the Free Fall Motion of a Bouncing Ping-Pong Ball and Calculating the Free Fall Acceleration (Teacher s Guide)

The dynamic equation for the angular motion of the wheel is R w F t R w F w ]/ J w

Geometric Adaptive Control of Quadrotor UAVs Transporting a Cable-Suspended Rigid Body

Attitude Control and Dynamics of Solar Sails

Collision of a small bubble with a large falling particle

Section 4: The Basics of Satellite Orbits

SELECTION AND ANALYSIS OF THE LANDING GEAR FOR UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE FOR SAE AERO DESIGN SERIES

= = GM. v 1 = Ωa 1 sin i.

Dynamic Process Modeling. Process Dynamics and Control

Transcription:

Dynamics and Control of an Elastic Dumbbell Spacecraft in a Central Gravitational Field Amit K. Sanyal Jinglai Shen N. Harris McClamroch Department of Aerospace Engineering University of Michigan Conference on Decision and Control December 10, 2003

Related Prior Literature Relatively few publications treat the coupling between orbit, attitude, and shape degrees of freedom for multi-body spacecraft This is important for spatially large spacecraft Multi-body spacecraft examples studied in the literature Space robots Tethered spacecraft Dumbbell spacecraft Connections with full-body problems Spatially distributed, elastic spacecraft orbiting a massive central body Spherical spacecraft orbiting a massive spatially distributed, elastic central body N-body problems for spatially distributed, elastic bodies Applications to asteroids and asteroid pairs

Remainder of this Presentation Models of dumbbell spacecraft Determine equations of motion Determine reduced equations of motion Determine relative equilibria Controllability results for dumbbell spacecraft Linear controllability of full equations Linear controllability of reduced equations Comments on spacecraft control problems

Description of Elastic Dumbbell Spacecraft Dumbbell spacecraft consists of two identical mass particles connected by an elastic link Central body gravity forces act on each of the mass particles Control forces act on each of the mass particles Simplifying assumption: all motion occurs in a fixed orbital plane Generalized coordinates Orbit DOFs: orbit variables r,f Attitude DOF: attitude variable q Shape DOF: shape variable q

Dumbbell Spacecraft Figure: Full Actuation

Full Equations of Motion of Dumbbell Spacecraft Lagrangian formulation Gravity potential (approximation) V g = - mm r Ê 2 - q2 r 2 1- ˆ ( 3cos2 q) Ë Elastic potential V s = k( q - l) 2 Lagrangian function ( q 2 ) L = m r 2 + r 2 f 2 + q 2 q 2 + 2q 2 q f + q 2 f 2 + -V g -V s

Equations of motion Ê 2m r - m 2rf 2-2m r 2 + 3mq2 Ë r 4 1-3cos 2 ˆ ( q) = F r ( ) = F f 2m r 2 f + 2r r f + q 2 f + q 2 q + 2q q f + 2q q q ( ) + 6mmq2 2m q 2 q + q 2 f + 2q q f + 2q q q r 3 ( f 2 ) + 2mmq r 3 2m q - m 2qq 2 + 4q q f + 2q cosq sinq = 2qN ( 1-3cos 2 q) + 2k(q - l) = T

Dumbbell Spacecraft Figure: No Orbital Actuation

Reduced Equations of Motion of Dumbbell Spacecraft Assume attitude and shape control inputs only, i.e. no orbital inputs Since f is cyclic, angular momentum is a conserved quantity: is constant ( ) p = L f = 2m ( q2 q + r 2 + q 2 f ) Form the classical Routhian R = L - pf = m r 2 + q 2 q 2 + -V g -V s ( q ) 2 ( q 2 ) - p - 2mq2 ( ) 4m r 2 + q 2

Reduced equations of motion r = rq 4 ( r 2 + q 2 ) 2 q 2 p 2 r + 4m 2 r 2 + q 2 m( r - qcosq) - 2 r 2 + q 2-2qr cosq ( ) 2 - rq 2 p ( ) 2 m r 2 + q 2 m r + qcosq ( ) 3/2-2( r 2 + q 2 + 2qr cosq) 3/2 ( r + r 3 q ) rq( r 2 + q 2 ) m( r 2 + q 2 ) 2 q - sinq 2qr( r 2 + q 2-2qr cosq) 3/2 + m( r 2 + q 2 ) sinq 2qr( r 2 + q 2 + 2qr cosq) 3/2 ( q - q r ) ( ( ) + r 2 + q 2 ) mr 2 q 2 Nq q = - 2 q3 - p r mqr r 2 + q 2 q ( )

q = r 4 q ( r 2 + q 2 ) 2 q 2 p 2 q + 4m 2 r 2 + q 2 m( q - r cosq) - 2 r 2 + q 2-2qr cosq ( ) 2 + ( ) 3/2 - - 2k m (q - l)+ T 2m r 2 pq ( ) 2 m r 2 + q 2 m q + r cosq q ( ) ( ) 3/2 2 r 2 + q 2 + 2qr cosq f = p - 2mq2 q 2m r 2 + q 2 ( )

Relative Equilibria for the Dumbbell Spacecraft Assume there are no control force inputs The dumbbell spacecraft has two classes of relative equilibrium solutions (equilibrium solutions for the reduced equations) The longitudinal axis of the dumbbell spacecraft is aligned with the local vertical q e = 0 (or p ), f 2 e = m 3 r + 3mq e 2, 3mq e 5 3 e r e r e = k ( m q e - l) The longitudinal axis of the dumbbell spacecraft is aligned with the local horizontal q e = p 2 (or 3p 2 ), f 2 e = m 3 r - 3mq e 2 5 e 2r, q e = l e

Linearized Full Orbit, Attitude, and Shape Equations Consider a neighborhood of a relative equilibrium for which the longitudinal axis of the dumbbell spacecraft is aligned with the local vertical Define the full perturbations from this relative equilibrium as [ ] T x = dr df dq dq Define the orbit, attitude and shape control force inputs as [ ] T u = F r F f N T The linearized full equations of motion have the form M x +C x + Kx = Bu Define the parameter w 2 = m 3 r + 3mq e 2 e r e 5

È 2m 0 0 0 0 2m(r 2 M = e + q 2 2 e ) 2mq e 0 2 2 0 2mq e 2mq e 0 Î 0 0 0 2m È 0-4mr e w 0 0 4mr C = e w 0 0 4mq e w 0 0 0 4mq e w Î 0-4mq e w -4mq e w 0 È Ê -2m w 2 + 2m 2 3 r +12mq ˆ e 12mmq 5 0 0 e 4 Ë e r e r e È 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 K = 6mmq 0 0 e 0, B = 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 2q 0 r e 12mmq Ê e 0 0 2k - 2m w 2 + 2m ˆ Î 0 0 0 1 4 3 Î r e Ë r e

Linearized Reduced Orbit, Attitude, and Shape Equations Consider a neighborhood of a relative equilibrium for which the longitudinal axis of the dumbbell spacecraft is aligned with the local vertical Define the reduced perturbations from this relative equilibrium as [ ] T x = dr dq dq Define the attitude and shape control force inputs as u = [ N T ] T The linearized full equations of motion are M x +C x + Kx = Bu

C = 0 2 pq e 2 r e r e 2 + q e 2 ( ) 2 Ê Ë ˆ 0-2 pq e 2 r e r e 2 + q e 2 ( ) 2 Ê Ë ˆ 0 2 pq e r e 2 r e 2 + q e 2 ( ) 2 Ê Ë ˆ 0-2 pq e r e 2 r e 2 + q e 2 ( ) 2 Ê Ë ˆ 0 È Î K =... 0... 0... 0... 0 4k +... È Î M = 2m 0 0 0 2mr e 2 q e 2 r e 2 + q e 2 Ê Ë ˆ 0 0 0 2m È Î B = 0 0 2q e 0 0 1 È Î

Linearized Equations of Motion The linearized orbit, attitude and shape equations of motion are coupled, with a special mathematical structure that reflects the Hamiltonian features of the dumbbell spacecraft The linearized orbit, attitude and shape equations of motion generalize the Clohessy Wiltshire equations for orbit perturbations only Linear gravity gradient equations for attitude perturbations only Linear equations for elastic shape perturbations only Linearized orbit, attitude and shape equations can be obtained in a neighborhood of the horizontally aligned relative equilibrium

System theoretic properties of these linearized models can be studied using the linear models Stability Multivariable transfer function properties Controllability Observability Control problems for perturbations from a relative equilibrium can be formulated in terms of the linearized orbit, attitude and shape equations of motion Open loop maneuvers High thrust impulsive maneuvers Low thrust maneuvers Stabilization problems

Controllability Properties of the Dumbbell Spacecraft Linear full equations of motion Complete controllability using orbit, attitude and shape actuation Full actuation assumption Can cancel all orbit, attitude, and shape coupling Complete controllability using orbit actuation only Orbit actuation can be used to control attitude and shape through coupling Attitude and shape can be controlled without direct actuation Not controllable using attitude and shape actuation only Angular momentum is conserved

Linear reduced equations of motion Complete controllability using attitude and shape actuation only Can perform orbit maneuvers on a constant angular momentum surface Complete controllability using attitude actuation only Can perform orbit maneuvers on a constant angular momentum surface Complete controllability using shape actuation only Can perform orbit maneuvers on a constant angular momentum surface

Conclusions Major themes of this presentation Multi-body spacecraft control problems that take an integrated approach to control of orbit, attitude and shape dynamics have been neglected in the published literature These integrated multi-body spacecraft control problems are conceptually and computationally challenging Controllability results have been obtained for the dumbbell spacecraft example There are many open theoretical and applied research problems on integrated orbit, attitude and shape control of underactuated multi-body spacecraft Can this integrated spacecraft control approach be made into an effective spacecraft technology for spatially large spacecraft?