GT-Suite Users International Conference Frankfurt a.m., October 21 st 2002 NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO IMPROVE ENGINE CONTROL DURING TIP-IN MANOEUVRES F. MILLO, C.V. FERRARO, F. MALLAMO DIPARTIMENTO DI ENERGETICA POLITECNICO DI TORINO L. PILO FA-GM POWERTRAIN
Presentation overview Introduction Experimental set-up The engine model The vehicle and driveline model Model validation Evaluation of control strategies Conclusions Future work
Introduction Vehicle driveability has nowadays undoubtedly become a key success factor for passenger cars, thus setting a further target for the designers besides pollutant emissions, fuel consumption and vehicle performance. However, while the determination of fuel consumption and exhaust emissions follows well established standards, objective and reproducible criteria for the evaluation of a vehicle s driveability are more difficult to be defined: a rating system based on the subjective assessments of experienced test drivers recorded during a sequence of relevant manoeuvres is usually employed. One of the most common among these manouvres is the so called tip-in, that is a sudden opening of the throttle operated from conditions of low speed and low load.
Introduction Tip-in manoeuvres Sudden opening of the throttle 120 100 Vehicle jerkings and acceleration fluctuations load [%] 80 60 40 20 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 time [s] The abrupt change of the torque delivered by the engine excites the torsional natural frequencies of the driveline, causing vehicle jerking and acceleration fluctuations, which are the main responsible for the driver s and passengers perception and assessment of perfomance and comfort.
Introduction Tip-in manoeuvres: The role of numerical simulation The vehicle s behavior during tip-in is obviously determined by the powertrain design, but the engine management system may play a decisive role, especially with modern torque based systems, which are able to decouple the engine response from the driver s demand by means, for example, of a drive by wire (DBW) throttle, that electronically filters the throttle valve opening command during fast acceleration transients, smoothing the vehicle response to sharp driver s requests. However, since designing and tuning the engine control system still remains a time consuming activity, several efforts have been made to explore ways that could lead to significant reductions of the development process: in particular, the use of numerical simulation to build engine models by which control strategies can be tested and tuned on a desk seems to be very promising.
Introduction Tip-in manoeuvres: The role of numerical simulation The aim of this work is therefore to evaluate the potential of numerical simulation in the analysis of the dynamic transient response of a vehicle during tip-in manoeuvres, so as to reduce the experimental tests required to optimize the control strategies of the engine management system.
Presentation overview Introduction Experimental set-up The engine model The vehicle and driveline model Model validation Evaluation of control strategies Conclusions Future work
Experimental set-up VEHICLE: FIAT PUNTO MAIN ENGINE FEATURES Type Bore/Stroke Displacement Compression Ratio Combustion Chamber Maximum Power Maximum Torque Fuel Metering System Distribution S.I. 4 cylinders in line 70.8 / 78.86 mm 1242 cm 3 10.6 : 1 Pent-roof 52 kw @ 5000 rpm 107 Nm @ 4000 rpm Multi-point electronic injection DOHC, 4 valves/cylinder
Experimental set-up DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM Data Elaborazione analysis dati Digital acquisition Acquisizione dati digitale Acquired signals 1. Wheels angular speed Amplifier Amplificatore 1 2 3 4 Amplificatore f-v Converter Convertitore f-v f-v Convertitore Converter f-v Amplifier A/F Analyzer Analizzatore a/f Power Alimentatore supply 5 2. Engine angular speed 1. Giri ruota 2. Giri motore Segnali acquisiti 3. Air-Fuel ratio 4. 3. Throttle Dosatura a/f opening 4. Apertura farfalla 5. Vehicle longitudinal 5. Accelerazione longitudinale acceleration vettura
Presentation overview Introduction Experimental set-up The engine model The vehicle and driveline model Model validation Evaluation of control strategies Conclusions Future work
The engine model Main features of the engine model intake plenum + primary intake runners air inlet air filter + Helmotz resonator connecting pipe + throttle exhaust manifold Close coupled catalyst
The engine model Validation of the engine model: full load conditions Global quantities 240 60 Brake torque [Nm] 200 160 120 80 SIM EXP 50 40 30 20 Brake power [kw] 40 10 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 n [rpm] 0
The engine model Validation of the engine model: full load conditions Instantaneous quantities 60 50 W.O.T n = 4000 r.p.m. experimental simulation Pressure [bar] 40 30 20 10 0-360 -270-180 -90 0 90 180 270 360 Crank Angle [deg]
The engine model Validation of the engine model: part load conditions 10 9 8 1500 rpm bmep [bar] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 EXP SIM 0 200 400 600 800 1000 inlet manifold pressure [mbar]
Presentation overview Introduction Experimental set-up The engine model The vehicle and driveline model Model validation Evaluation of control strategies Conclusions Future work
The vehicle and driveline model Schematic diagram of the driveline Axle shaft Front-wheel drive 5 speed gear box Asymmetric axle shafts
The vehicle and driveline model 9 DOF Torsional Model (Matlab-Simulink) Equivalent inertia: 1. Engine 2. Clutch + Gear-box + Differential 3. 5. Hub + rim 4. 6. Tyres 9. 9. Vehicle Load torque Engine torque C mot 3 4 3 4 7 7 9 C res 1 2 1 2 5 6 5 6 8 8 9 9 Load torque
Simulation Scheme Throttle opening A / F GT-Power Engine model Engine torque MATLAB - SIMULINK Driveline and Vehicle Model Engine speed
Presentation overview Introduction Experimental set-up The engine model The vehicle and driveline model Model validation Evaluation of control strategies Conclusions Future work
Model validation Validation of the complete engine-vehicle model Example: 2 nd gear - Initial engine speed: 1500 rpm 120 Time history of the throttle opening 100 load [%] 80 60 40 20 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 time [s]
Model validation Example: 2 nd gear transmission ratio Engine angular speed: simulation vs experimental results
Model validation Example: 2 nd gear transmission ratio Vehicle longitudinal acceleration: simulation vs experimental results
Presentation overview Introduction Experimental set-up The engine model The vehicle and driveline model Model validation Evaluation of control strategies Conclusions Future work
Evaluation of control strategies Use of the model for the evaluation of control strategies After the assessment of the accuracy and of the reliability of the complete engine-vehicle model, the numerical simulation has been used as a prediction tool to analyze the impact of different control strategies on vehicle driveability during tip-in. The two following strategies were evaluated: drive by wire control spark advance control
Evaluation of control strategies Drive by wire (DBW) throttle control 120 100 Time history of the throttle opening load [%] 80 60 40 20 direct control DBW 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 time [s]
Evaluation of control strategies Drive by wire (DBW) throttle control Engine angular speed: comparison between DBW and direct control in 2 nd gear
Evaluation of control strategies Drive by wire (DBW) throttle control Vehicle acceleration: comparison between DBW and direct control in 2 nd gear
Evaluation of control strategies Drive by wire (DBW) throttle control Jerk and vehicle acceleration during tip-in: comparison between DBW and direct control in 2 nd gear
Evaluation of control strategies Spark advance controller 120 Engine torque [Nm] 110 100 90 80 70 basis advance basis advance -6 basis advance -9 basis advance +3 basis advance +6 60 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 n [rpm]
Evaluation of control strategies Spark advance controller Engine angular speed: comparison between simulation with and without spark advance controller
Evaluation of control strategies Spark advance controller Vehicle acceleration: comparison between simulation with and without spark advance controller
Presentation overview Introduction Experimental set-up The engine model The vehicle and driveline model Model validation Evaluation of control strategies Conclusions Future work
CONCLUSIONS A one-dimensional fluid-dynamic engine model was employed in conjunction with a Matlab-Simulink vehicle and driveline model to analyze the dynamic transient response of a gasoline passenger car during tip-in manoeuvres. A detailed validation process of the complete engine-vehicle model, based on several sets of experimental data, was performed. The numerical simulation was shown to be reliable and helpful for the study of proper control strategies of the engine management system aiming to enhance the vehicle driveability.
Presentation overview Introduction Experimental set-up The engine model The vehicle and driveline model Model validation Evaluation of control strategies Conclusions Future work
FUTURE WORK Further investigations will be devoted to the improvement of the simulation of the vehicle acceleration, by means of more detailed models for the driveline and the vehicle. On the engine side the analysis will be extended to the evaluation of more detailed ECU models, in order to better represent the behavior of torque based systems. Moreover, the use of more detailed combustion models to obtain essential information such as knock likelihood caused by spark timing increases will also be evaluated.
FUTURE WORK Example of a more detailed ECU model of a torque based system.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors wish to thank: Gamma Technlogies for the support in the simulation activities; FA-GM Powertrain S.p.A. for the support and the permission to publish this work; Dr. Ferreri, Dr. Franchino and Dr. Tuttobene (Politecnico di Torino) for their helpful contribution during the experimental and simulation data processing.
A/F during tip-in