Digital Elevation Model of Miami, Florida: Procedures, Data Sources, and Analysis

Similar documents
Bathymetric Digital Elevation Model of British Columbia, Canada: Procedures, Data Sources, and Analysis

noaa NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-30 DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL OF PORTLAND, MAINE: PROCEDURES, DATA SOURCES AND ANALYSIS

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA : PROCEDURES, DATA SOURCES AND ANALYSIS

MSDI: Workflows, Software and Related Data Standards

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS OF NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA: PROCEDURES, DATA SOURCES AND ANALYSIS

The Integration of Hydrographic and Oceanographic Data in a Marine Geographic Information System U.S. Hydro 2015

Seamlessly integrating bathymetric and topographic data to support tsunami modeling and forecasting efforts

REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT: A GIS APPROACH TO SPATIAL DATA ANALYSIS. Lynn Copeland Hardegree, Jennifer M. Wozencraft 1, Rose Dopsovic 2 INTRODUCTION

Earth Coordinates & Grid Coordinate Systems

Hydrographic Survey of the Keith Lake-Salt Bayou System

Coastal Engineering Indices to Inform Regional Management

Using LIDAR to monitor beach changes: Goochs Beach, Kennebunk, Maine

Predicting Coastal Hazards: A Southern California Demonstration

SHOALS Toolbox: Software to Support Visualization and Analysis of Large, High-Density Data Sets

Bathymetric Attributed Grids (BAGs): Discovery of Marine Datasets and Geospatial Metadata Visualization

Water Monitoring System Website User Guide

New Coastal Study for Puerto Rico FIRMs. Paul Weberg, FEMA RII Mat Mampara, Dewberry Jeff Gangai, Dewberry Krista Collier, Baker

Implementing Marine SDI Through Capacity Building

Ocean Engineering, Surveying and Mapping Services

Earth Data Science in The Era of Big Data and Compute

Request for Proposals for Topographic Mapping. Issued by: Teton County GIS and Teton County Engineering Teton County, Wyoming

Martin County Coastal GIS Program St Lucie Inlet Planning Tool

HAZUS th Annual Conference

Development of an Impervious-Surface Database for the Little Blackwater River Watershed, Dorchester County, Maryland

noaa NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24 ETOPO1 1 ARC-MINUTE GLOBAL RELIEF MODEL: PROCEDURES, DATA SOURCES AND ANALYSIS C. Amante B.W.

On the CyberShARE site you will find this interpolated version (labeled SRTMv4_90m)

Jurisdictional Boundaries. And. Establishment of Mean Low Water

Create a folder on your network drive called DEM. This is where data for the first part of this lesson will be stored.

Sea Level Change. Miami-Dade Sea Level Rise Task Force

TopoBathy Database Mozambique

SHOALS Toolbox: Software to Support Visualization and Analysis of Large, High-Density Data Sets

Vertical Datums: An Introduction and Software Review

Error detection of bathymetry data by visualization using GIS

3D Visualization of Seismic Activity Associated with the Nazca and South American Plate Subduction Zone (Along Southwestern Chile) Using RockWorks

DEVELOPING AN INUNDATION MAP STANDARD FOR THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

San Francisco Bay Margin Conservation Decision Support System (DSS)

FREIGHT FORCE, INC. (FLORIDA FREIGHT) 8437 NW 72ND ST MIAMI, FL Cities Served by - MIA [Order by City, State, Zip, Zone]

1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK. DATE July 29, 2010 PROJECT No /2000

ART Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Report September 2012 Appendix C. ART GIS Exposure Analysis

'Developments and benefits of hydrographic surveying using multispectral imagery in the coastal zone

ADWR GIS Metadata Policy

WEST COAST DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELS. Coastal Models Supporting our Nation s Needs through Science and Technology

Flood Damage Mitigation And Insurance Costs

Strategic Beach Management Plan Southeast Atlantic Coast Region

A METHODOLOGY FOR GIS INTERFACING OF MARINE DATA

TerraColor White Paper

FDOU Project 26B Task 4 Our Florida Reefs Community Working Group Scenario Planning Results

Principles and Practices of Data Integration

MONITORING STANDARDS FOR BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS

Los Angeles County. Open Pacific Coast Study. California Coastal Analysis and Mapping Project

An Initial Assessment of the Impacts of Sea Level Rise to the California Coast

Real-time Ocean Forecasting Needs at NCEP National Weather Service

User s Guide. Zuniga Point. Point Loma

Damage to Rest Beach infrastructure.

Developing Ocean Energy in Ireland. Belmullet Wave Energy Test Site

The Nippon Foundation / GEBCO Postgraduate Certificate in Ocean Bathymetry Training Program at the

A HYDROLOGIC NETWORK SUPPORTING SPATIALLY REFERENCED REGRESSION MODELING IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

The Coast of Crystal Cove Orange County, California

COMMERCIAL LANDINGS STATISTICS RED SNAPPER IN THE GULF OF MEXICO. John Poffenberger 1

Stream Channel Cross Sections for a Reach of the Boise River in Ada County, Idaho

INTERPRETATION ADDENDUM CANADIAN MINING COMPANY INC. SUITE WEST HASTINGS STREET VANCOUVER, BC V6E 3X2 3D INDUCED POLARIZATION

Remote Sensing, GPS and GIS Technique to Produce a Bathymetric Map

GIS Data Discovery Workshop

Producing bathymetric ENCs with SevenCs ENC Tools

South Park Bridge Hydrographic Survey (3OOf 97) Seattle, Washington

Ohio Department of Transportation. GEOPAK V8i LiDAR Tools User Guide Using OSIP LiDAR Data in GEOPAK

CDM. City of Jacksonville Master Stormwater Management Plan (MSMP) Update. December 2008 Update. Agenda. 1. Data Collection. 2.

Storm tide is the water level rise during a storm due to the combination of storm surge and the astronomical tide.

AUTOMATED DEM VALIDATION USING ICESAT GLAS DATA INTRODUCTION

Mariana Leckner, Ph.D., Professor, American Military University Thomas O. Herrington, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Stevens Institute of Technology

GIS Spatial Data Standards

Metadata for Big River Watershed Geologic and Geomorphic Data

Malcolm L. Spaulding Professor Emeritus, Ocean Engineering University of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI 02881

Storm tide is the water level rise during a storm due to the combination of storm surge and the astronomical tide.

New Technologies and Airborne LiDAR Bathymetry survey Techniques in European Environmental Coastal Mapping Projects

5. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

OCEANOGRAPHY Vol.II Morphology of Ocean Floor and Plate Tectonics - Chengsung Wang MORPHOLOGY OF OCEAN FLOOR AND PLATE TECTONICS

Chapter Overview. Bathymetry. Measuring Bathymetry. Echo Sounding Record. Measuring Bathymetry. CHAPTER 3 Marine Provinces

Gravir Outer, Isle of Lewis Site and Hydrographic survey report

06 - NATIONAL PLUVIAL FLOOD MAPPING FOR ALL IRELAND THE MODELLING APPROACH

CHICKASAW COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, AND INCORPORATED AREAS

2005 Hydrographic Survey of South San Francisco Bay, California

Regulating Offshore Renewable Energy Leasing and Development

Using Google Earth to Explore Plate Tectonics

TIDAL DATUMS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS

PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION LIVING IN COASTAL AREAS. Name: Percentage of Total Population Living in Coastal Areas.

Possible Inundation Map of Coastal Areas of Gujarat with a Tsunamigenic Earthquake

Transcription:

Digital Elevation Model of Miami, Florida: Procedures, Data Sources, and Analysis Prepared for the National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program (NTHMP) by the NOAA National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) January 21, 215 Carignan, K.S. 1, S.J. McLean 2, B.W. Eakins 1, L. Beasley 1, M.R. Love 1 and M. Sutherland 1 1 Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder 2 NOAA, National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, Colorado Summary In January of 215, NOAA s National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) developed an integrated bathymetric topographic digital elevation model (DEM) of Miami, Florida for the National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program (NTHMP). The DEM will be used to support modeling tsunami generation, propagation, and inundation. The DEM covers Miami, Florida including the communities of Hillsboro Beach, Pompano Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Dania Beach, Miami Beach, Miami, Key Biscayne, Homestead A.F.B., Grayvik, and Ocean Reef Club. Extents of this DEM, procedures, data sources, and analysis are described below. The methodologies used by NGDC in developing DEM are described in the NOAA Technical Memorandum-52 for Central California and San Francisco Bay (Carignan et al., 211). DEM Specifications The Miami, Florida DEM was built to the specifications listed in Table 1. Figure 1 shows this 1/3 arc-second Miami, Florida integrated topographic bathymetric DEM boundary in red, the 211 Key West and 21 Palm Beach integrated topographic bathymetric 1/3 arc-second DEMs in green. Table 1. Specifications for the Miami, Florida, Florida DEM. Cell Size 1/3 arc-second Coverage 79.4 to 8.41 W, 25.25 to 26.32 N Coordinate System Geographic decimal degrees Horizontal Datum World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS 84) Vertical Datum NAVD 88 Vertical Units Meters Grid Format ASCII raster grid 1

Figure 1. Map image of the boundaries for the 1/3 arc-second Miami, Florida DEM in red and the previously developed DEMs in green. Data Sources and Processing Digital coastlines were extracted from NOAA s Office of Coast Survey (OCS) ENC Direct to GIS online extraction service (http://nauticalcharts.noaa.gov/csdl/ctp/encdirect_new.htm). These coastlines were merged and edited to match either recently acquired high resolution lidar data or imagery available via Google Earth and ESRI s World Imagery map service (http://www.arcgis.com/features/maps/imagery.html). Bathymetric and topographic data were downloaded from NOAA s Office for Coastal Management (OCM) and Office of Coast Survey (OCS), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the U.S. Geological Society (USGS), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute (FWRI), and NGDC. Figure 2 shows the source and coverage of the datasets used in developing the Miami, Florida DEM. 2

Figure 2. Source and coverage of the datasets used in compiling the Miami, Florida DEM. 3

Table 2 lists the bathymetry data used in the compilation of the Miami, Florida DEM including NOS hydrographic surveys (Appendix A) and multibeam surveys (Appendix B), and USACE harbor surveys. Table 2: Bathymetric data sources used in compiling the Miami, Florida DEM. Source Date Data Type Spatial Resolution Horizontal Datum Vertical Datum NOAA NOS 1928 to 214 Hydrographic survey soundings < 1 meter to several kilometers Unknown, NAD 27 geographic, NAD 83 geographic, or NAD 83 UTM Zone 17 North Mean Low Water (MLW), or Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) USACE 29 to 214 Hydrographic condition survey < 5 meter point spacing and ~ 3 meter line spacing NAD 83 Florida State Planes, East Zone, US Foot MLLW NGDC 1996 to 214 Multibeam bathymetry 1 meter grid NAD 83 geographic Assumed Mean Sea Level (MSL) OCS 1964 to 214 ENC 1:2, to 1:2, WGS 84 geographic MLLW FWRI 1996 Intracoastal Waterway depth Digitized project control data maps NAD 83 PCS Albers unknown USGS/NPS/NASA 26 EAARL bathymetric lidar DEM 1 meter NAD 83 UTM Zone 17 NAVD 88 Bathymetric data were transformed to WGS 84 geographic and NAVD 88 using GDAL and NOAA s VDatum transformation tool. Appendix C illustrates the range of vertical datums within Miami, Florida. Where recent, higher resolution data exists, older data were superseded. EAARL bathymetric lidar DEMs were edited to remove anomalous elevation values at the edges. The bathymetric data were converted to xyz format before combining with the coastline data to generate a bathymetric pre-surface at 1/3 arc-second. This bathymetric surface grid was converted to xyz format before incorporating in the final DEM. Topographic-bathymetric data (Table 3) were transformed to WGS 84 geographic using GDAL. Bathymetric values were separated from topographic values and used only in the bathymetric surface. Topographic values in these two lidar datasets were clipped to the coastline and filtered above Topographic data used in developing the Miami, Florida DEM are listed in Table 4. Transformations to WGS 84 geographic were done using GDAL. As all topographic data were available in NAVD 88, no vertical datum changes were necessary. All topographic data were converted to xyz format for the final gridding process. The 4

converted xyz data files were clipped to the coastline to remove NoData values and returns over water. Jetties and breakwaters at Port Everglades and Fisher Harbor that were not completely resolved in the topographic data were supplemented by digitizing the features and creating additional data points with elevation values matching surrounding data. Table 3: Topographic-Bathymetric data source used in compiling the Miami, Florida DEM. Source Date Data Type Spatial Resolution Horizontal Datum Vertical Datum 26 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) JALBTCX Topobathy Lidar: 26 Topographic- Bathymetric Lidar DEM 2 meter NAD 83 geographic NAVD 88 29 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) JALBTCX Topobathy Lidar: Southeast Florida 29 Topographic- Bathymetric Lidar DEM 2 meter NAD 83 geographic NAVD 88 Table 4: Topographic data sources used in compiling the Miami, Florida DEM. Source - Title Date Data Type Spatial Resolution Horizontal Datum Vertical Datum USGS Sofia 211 DEM 4 meters NAD 83 UTM Zone 17 (meters) NAVD 88 OCM - 27-28 Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) Coastal Lidar: Southeast Florida Counties and the Keys 27 to 28 USGS NED 213 Lidar GeoTIFF Topographic DEM 2 meters NAD 83 geographic NAVD 88 1/3 arc second NAD 83 geographic NAVD 88 DEM Development Development of the Miami, Florida DEM followed procedures documented in NOAA Technical Memorandum NGDC-52 for Central California and San Francisco Bay (Carignan et al., 211). Exceptions being the bathymetric pre-surface was generated at 1/3 arc-second. Gridding weight was modified to Table 5. Table 5: Data hierarchy used to assign gridding weight in MB-System. Dataset OCM - 27-28 Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) Coastal Lidar: Southeast Florida Counties and the Keys Relative Gridding Weight 1 NGDC digitized points 1 5

NOS hydrographic surveys (post 1985) 1 USACE hydrographic surveys 1 OCS ENC soundings 1 Bathymetric pre-surface 1 USGS Biscayne 1 OCM - 29 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) JALBTCX Topobathy Lidar 1 USGS Sofia DEM 1 Coastline 1 NGDC multibeam surveys 1 USGS NED 1/3 DEM 1 MHW DEM Development The MHW Miami, Florida DEM was developed by generating a conversion grid based on VDatum software. The completed conversion grid was then applied to the NAVD 88 DEM. DEM Analysis The completed Miami, Florida DEMs were compared to ENC sounding data, topographic benchmarks, and high resolution imagery. Inconsistencies were evaluated and resolved based on most current or reliable data available. Acknowledgement The authors acknowledge the Everglades Depth Estimation Network (EDEN) project and the US Geological Survey for providing the [insert data type here] for the purpose of this research/report. Reference Carignan, K.S., L.A. Taylor, B.W. Eakins, R.J. Caldwell, D.Z. Friday, P.R. Grothe, E. Lim (211). Digital Elevation Models of Central California and San Francisco Bay: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis. NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-52, NOAA, pp. 49. 6

Yang, Z., E. Myers, I. Jeong, S. White (212). VDatum for Coastal Waters from the Florida Shelf to the South Atlantic Bight: Tidal Datums, Marine Grids, and Sea Surface Topography. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS CS 27. VDatum Version 3.3, Florida/Georgia Coastal Waterways, Fort Lauderdale, FL to Sapelo Island, GA. v.1 (211). http://vdatum.noaa.gov/welcome.html [October 214]. 7

Appendix A: NOS Surveys Survey ID Date Scale Original Horizontal Datum Original Vertical Datum H4811 1928 2 unknown MLW H515 1929 2 unknown MLW H558 193 2 unknown MLW H5535 1934 2 unknown MLW H5536 1934 2 unknown MLW H5542 1934 2 unknown MLW H5578 1934 2 unknown MLW H5614 1934 5 unknown MLW H5726 1934 2 unknown MLW H5727 1935 1 unknown MLW H5779 1935 1 unknown MLW H8735 1963 1 NAD 1927 MLW H8736 1963 1 NAD 1927 MLW H8782 1964 1 NAD 1927 MLW H9926 198 to 1981 1 NAD 1927 MLW H1473 1993 1 NAD 1983 MLLW H1474 1993 1 NAD 1983 MLLW H1493 1993 1 NAD 1983 MLLW H1748 1997 1 NAD 1983 MLLW H1748A 1998 1 NAD 1983 MLLW H1749A 1998 1 NAD 1983 UTM 18 MLLW F532 27 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H11868 28 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H11869 28 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H1187 28 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H11871 28 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H128 28 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H12116 28 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H12117 28 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H12118 28 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H11896 29 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H11897 29 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW H11898 29 1 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW F64 214 5 NAD 1983 UTM 17 MLLW 8

Appendix B: NGDC Multibeam surveys Survey ID Date Ship Institution EW969 1996 Maurice Ewing Marine Geoscience Data System (MGDS) Original Horizontal Datum NAD 1983 geographic Original Vertical Datum Assumed MSL EW971A 1997 Maurice Ewing MGDS NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL USF1999 1999 Bellows University of South Florida (USF) NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL USF2 2 Bellows USF NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL KM21 22 Kilo Moana University of Hawaii (UH) NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL KN166L2 22 Knorr Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL EW41 24 Maurice Ewing MGDS NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL KN182L2 25 Knorr WHOI NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL NF-7-9- GRNMS NF-7-14- FKNMS 27 Nancy Foster National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL 27 Nancy Foster NOAA NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL KNOX18RR 28 Roger Revelle University of California, Scripps Institution of Oceanography (UC/SIO) NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL KNOX2RR 28 Roger Revelle UC/SIO NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL NF-8-3- FACE 28 Nancy Foster NOAA NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL LCE21 21 Lost Coast Explorer NOAA NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL EX116 211 Okeanos Explorer NOAA NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL AT18-18 212 Atlantis UNOLS R2R NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL EX122Leg1 212 Okeanos Explorer NOAA NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL EX123 212 Okeanos Explorer NOAA NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL NF-13-1T 213 Nancy Foster NOAA NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL EX142L1 214 Okeanos Explorer NOAA NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL EX143 214 Okeanos Explorer NOAA NAD 1983 geographic Assumed MSL 9

Appendix C: Difference between tidal datums at select tide stations in the DEM region. Station ID 8722861 8722899 8722939 8722951 87235 872373 87238 Station Name Hillsboro Inlet, Inside Lauderdaleby-the-Sea Ft. Lauderdale Bahia Yacht Club Port Everglades, Lake Mabel North Miami Beach Haulover, Inside Haulover Pier, N. Miami Beach MHHW.849.873.88.856.841.671.818 MHW.87.836.773.821.89.651.797 NAVD88.715.71.697.684.727.59.687 MTL.428.443.411.435.43.345.419 MSL.426.446.411.437.435.331.423 MLW.48.51.49.49.51.38.42 MLLW Time Period 12 mo. 3 yr. 12 mo. 12 mo. 872389 Biscayne Creek, ICWW.718.697.644.369.366.41 8723165 Biscayne Bay.723.73.643.371.371.4 2 yr. 1

Appendix C: Difference between tidal datums at select tide stations in the DEM region. Station ID 872317 8723178 8723214 8723289 872335 8723423 Station Name Miami Beach Miami Beach Gov. Cut Virginia Key Cutler, Biscayne Bay Ragged Key #3 Turkey Point, Biscayne Bay MHHW.823.762.667.649.567.543 MHW.798.749.651.631.544.525 NAVD88.721.62.592.536 MTL.423.396.343.336.293.279 MSL.428.396.335.334.288.271 MLW.49.43.35.4.41.33 MLLW Time Period 9 yr. 13 yr. 8723519 Ocean Reef Harbor, Key Largo.772.763.688.413.422.64 8723534 Card Sound Bridge.193.18.325.99.99.18 8723574 Manatee Creek, Barnes Sound.296 11