Viscosity of Liquids: Methanol and Water



Similar documents
SIZE OF A MOLECULE FROM A VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT

Partner: Jack 17 November Determination of the Molar Mass of Volatile Liquids

Chemistry of Biodiesel Production. Teacher Notes. DAY 1: Biodiesel synthesis (50 minutes)

Experiment 12E LIQUID-VAPOR EQUILIBRIUM OF WATER 1

Review - After School Matter Name: Review - After School Matter Tuesday, April 29, 2008

The Ideal Solution. ChemActivity T15

CHEMISTRY. Matter and Change. Section 13.1 Section 13.2 Section The Gas Laws The Ideal Gas Law Gas Stoichiometry

AP Chemistry A. Allan Chapter 1 Notes - Chemical Foundations

Viscosity: A Property of fluids Compare the viscosity of various liquids Describe factors that can modify the viscosity of a liquid 208-6

CHAPTER 2: LIQUID VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT

Copyright Warning & Restrictions

molecular aggregates would then be present in the water: e.g., linear chains containing

Polarity and Properties Lab PURPOSE: To investigate polar and non-polar molecules and the affect of polarity on molecular properties.

Chemistry 212 VAPOR PRESSURE OF WATER LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Diffusion and Fluid Flow

EXPERIMENT 15: Ideal Gas Law: Molecular Weight of a Vapor

Temperature. Number of moles. Constant Terms. Pressure. Answers Additional Questions 12.1

Molar Mass of Polyvinyl Alcohol by Viscosity

Chapter 4 Practice Quiz

Thermodynamics of Mixing

Lab: Properties of Polar and Nonpolar Substances

Equilibrium. Ron Robertson

In this experiment, we will use three properties to identify a liquid substance: solubility, density and boiling point..

PURIFICATION TECHNIQUES

Chapter 1: Chemistry: Measurements and Methods

48 Practice Problems for Ch Chem 1C - Joseph

Sample Test 1 SAMPLE TEST 1. CHAPTER 12

= 800 kg/m 3 (note that old units cancel out) J 1000 g = 4184 J/kg o C

MOLECULAR WEIGHT BY BOILING POINT ELEVATION

POLYDIMETHYLSILOXANE

Density Determinations and Various Methods to Measure

A Beer s Law Experiment

SODIUM CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSE

To calculate the value of the boiling point constant for water. To use colligative properties to determine the molecular weight of a substance.

THE IDEAL GAS LAW AND KINETIC THEORY

Name Class Date. In the space provided, write the letter of the term or phrase that best completes each statement or best answers each question.

A drop forms when liquid is forced out of a small tube. The shape of the drop is determined by a balance of pressure, gravity, and surface tension

Physical Properties of a Pure Substance, Water

Organic Chemistry Calculations

Performing Calculatons

Chemistry 13: States of Matter

Lecture 24 - Surface tension, viscous flow, thermodynamics

Recrystallization II 23

n molarity = M = N.B.: n = litres (solution)

Boyles Law. At constant temperature the volume occupied by a fixed amount of gas is inversely proportional to the pressure on the gas 1 P = P

vap H = RT 1T 2 = kj mol kpa = 341 K

Study the following diagrams of the States of Matter. Label the names of the Changes of State between the different states.

Lecture 9 Solving Material Balances Problems Involving Non-Reactive Processes

ph: Measurement and Uses

CHEMISTRY GAS LAW S WORKSHEET

This document establishes MSHA s Standard Test Procedure (STP) for the Determining the Viscosity of a Hydraulic Fluid in Saybolt Universal Seconds.

2. Why does the solubility of alcohols decrease with increased carbon chain length?

The Fundamentals of Gas Flow Calibration

experiment5 Understanding and applying the concept of limiting reagents. Learning how to perform a vacuum filtration.

Surface Tension. the surface tension of a liquid is the energy required to increase the surface area a given amount

Experiment 5: Phase diagram for a three-component system (Dated: April 12, 2010)

MOLAR AND PARTIAL MOLAR VOLUMES IN AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS (10/21/03)

catalase 2H 2 O 2 (l) ----> 2H 2 O (l) + O 2 (g)

EUDRAGIT E 100, EUDRAGIT E PO and

= atm. 760 mm Hg. = atm. d. 767 torr = 767 mm Hg. = 1.01 atm

POLYVINYL ALCOHOL. SYNONYMS Vinyl alcohol polymer, PVOH, INS No DEFINITION DESCRIPTION FUNCTIONAL USES CHARACTERISTICS

7. Gases, Liquids, and Solids 7.1 Kinetic Molecular Theory of Matter

Thermochemistry. r2 d:\files\courses\ \99heat&thermorans.doc. Ron Robertson

Effects of Temperature, Pressure and Water Vapor on Gas Phase Infrared Absorption by CO 2

Honors Chemistry: Unit 6 Test Stoichiometry PRACTICE TEST ANSWER KEY Page 1. A chemical equation. (C-4.4)

Experiment SURFACE TENSION OF LIQUIDS. Experiment 1, page 1 Version of June 17, 2016

atm = 760 torr = 760 mm Hg = kpa = psi. = atm. = atm. = 107 kpa 760 torr 1 atm 760 mm Hg = 790.

CHEM 2423 Recrystallization of Benzoic Acid EXPERIMENT 4 - Purification - Recrystallization of Benzoic acid

1. The Determination of Boiling Point

Piping Hydraulic Line Design and Sizing Software KLM Technology Group

Energy Transport. Focus on heat transfer. Heat Transfer Mechanisms: Conduction Radiation Convection (mass movement of fluids)

Micro Mole Rockets Hydrogen and Oxygen Mole Ratio As adapted from Flinn ChemTopic- Labs - Molar Relationships & Stoichiometry

KINETIC MOLECULAR THEORY OF MATTER

Freezing Point Depression: Why Don t Oceans Freeze? Teacher Advanced Version

Chapter 10. Can You draw the Lewis structure for a given covalently bonded molecule?

Determining Equivalent Weight by Copper Electrolysis

Gibbs Free Energy and Chemical Potential. NC State University

10.7 Kinetic Molecular Theory Kinetic Molecular Theory. Kinetic Molecular Theory. Kinetic Molecular Theory. Kinetic Molecular Theory

Asphalt Institute Technical Bulletin. Laboratory Mixing and Compaction Temperatures

VAPORIZATION IN MORE DETAIL. Energy needed to escape into gas phase GAS LIQUID. Kinetic energy. Average kinetic energy

EXPERIMENT 4 THE DETERMINATION OF THE CALORIC CONTENT OF A CASHEW NUT

EXPERIMENT 2 THE HYDROLYSIS OF t-butyl CHLORIDE. PURPOSE: To verify a proposed mechanism for the hydrolysis of t-butyl Chloride.

Distillation Experiment

Determination of Molar Mass by Freezing-Point Depression

Pre-Lab Notebook Content: Your notebook should include the title, date, purpose, procedure; data tables.

EXPERIMENT 10 CONSTANT HEAD METHOD

ISOLATION OF CAFFEINE FROM TEA

THE ACTIVITY OF LACTASE

Liberty High School Science Department Lab Report Format

Calorimetry: Heat of Vaporization

Name Lab #3: Solubility of Organic Compounds Objectives: Introduction: soluble insoluble partially soluble miscible immiscible

1 Introduction The Scientific Method (1 of 20) 1 Introduction Observations and Measurements Qualitative, Quantitative, Inferences (2 of 20)

1. Fluids Mechanics and Fluid Properties. 1.1 Objectives of this section. 1.2 Fluids

INVESTIGATION OF FALLING BALL VISCOMETRY AND ITS ACCURACY GROUP R1 Evelyn Chou, Julia Glaser, Bella Goyal, Sherri Wykosky

CHEM 36 General Chemistry EXAM #1 February 13, 2002

EXPERIMENT 3 (Organic Chemistry II) Nitration of Aromatic Compounds: Preparation of methyl-m-nitrobenzoate

Experiment #4 Sugar in Soft Drinks and Fruit Juices. Laboratory Overview CHEM August 2010

FUNDAMENTALS OF ENGINEERING THERMODYNAMICS

ACID-BASE TITRATIONS: DETERMINATION OF CARBONATE BY TITRATION WITH HYDROCHLORIC ACID BACKGROUND

Experiment 1: Measurement and Density

Transcription:

of Liquids: Methanol and Water Colin McGuire January 4 and February, 01 March, 01 1

1 Abstract This experiment was done in order to determine the viscosity of mixtures of methanol and water of concentrations 0, 40, 60, 80, and methanol by volume. An Otswald viscometer and a stop watch were used to record the time of flow for the reference fluid, water, and each mixture. This time was then used in conjunction with the density of our reference liquid and mixture to in order to calculate the viscosity of the mixture using equation 1. The viscosity of each solution was used to find the fluidity of the solution in equation. The fluidity and viscosity of the ideal solutions were calculated. The viscosities of the methanol solutions were g 1.36, 1.64, 1.55, 1.19, and 0.5656 centipoisse ( cms ) for the solutions of 0, 40, 60, 80, and respectively. Procedure This procedure was performed from a handout that is labeled Transport Properties and Chemical Kinetics. Experiment 17: of Liquids, Part I: Low viscosities. The procedure we used was slightly different in that we only used the methanol and water section and didnt use the toluene and p-xylene solution. A constant temperature bath was brought to 5 degrees Celsius and an Otswald viscometer was inserted. Water was added and pipetted up past the start line. The time is took for the solution to flow from the top band to the bottom band was recorded. Water was the reference sample and runs were conducted until the time of flow agreed within 0. seconds. When switching samples the viscometer was washed with soap and water and dried with acetone and suction. This same procedure was followed for each sample. 3 Data Collected The time of flow data was collected for water moving through the viscometer, which is our reference liquid, and is presented in table A. The time of flow data for each methanol mixture, table B was used with the water average time in equation 1 to calculate the viscostiy. For all of the tables the averages were calculated using the three values that agreed within 0. seconds. The densities used were those at 5 degrees Celsius. Within this equation is the viscometer constant, k, which is all of the data for the reference liquid. This value 4 ml is 1.48e cms. It was obtained from running water. With this value equation 1 is reduced to equation 3. The viscosities were used to find the fluidities using equation 4. The mole fractions of methanol and water and the viscosities of pure methanol and water were used to calculate the ideal viscosities of the solutions using equation 5. Then the mole fractions and viscosities of pure water and methanol were used to calculate

the ideal viscosities of the solutions. The mole fractions were calculated based on the volume of methanol in 10 ml of solution with water. The density of methanol and water at 5 degrees Celsius was used. These are presented in table C. Water 1 11. 61.97 3 57.38 4 6.36 5 6.38 6 61.96 7 6.0 8 6.1 Average 61.98 Table A: of Flights for water 1 98.04 1 188.06 1 114.56 1 93.6 1 48.63 91.4 117.31 115.05 93.53 48.65 3 94.59 3 117.41 3 115.04 3 93.36 3 48.69 4 94.78 4 117.76 4 115.06 4 93.46 4 48.66 5 94.17 Average 94.51 Average 117.49 Average 115.05 Average 93.45 Average 48.67 Table B: of Flights for methanol and water mixtures Table C Measured χ χh O Ideal Ideal 1.36 0.7353 0.103 0.8977 1.189 0.8410 1.64 0.6098 0.331 0.7669 1.7 0.7853 1.55 0.645 0.4061 0.5939 1.385 0.70 1.19 0.8403 0.6458 0.354 1.540 0.6495 0.5656 1.768 1.0 0 1.768 0.5656 3

3.1 Calculations η = ( η r ρ r t r )ρt (1) F = 1 η () η = kρt (3) Where k is the viscometer calibration constant, 1.48e 4 F = χ A F A + χ B F B (4) η = χ A ηa 1 + χ (5) B ηb 4 Discussion This experiment was successful in measuring the viscosities of pure liquids. This is known by the percent error of the pure substances. The percent error of the calculation of pure methanol is 8.56 %. The calculations of ideal fluidity were not accurate compared to the measured values. Tables D and E show the percent errors for these calculations. These large percent errors show that these solutions do not behave ideally. In this case the behavior of these solutions is not ideal making these equations not applicable. The effect of mixing methanol and water is actually making the resulting solution more viscous than either of the two liquids separately. This means that the intermolecular forces of the liquids are strongly interacting with each other. This prevents sliding of the molecules past each other and results in a more viscous fluid. Because the fluidity is very far off using the ideal case approximation it is valid to conclude that solutions of methanol and water are not at all ideal. If the calculated and ideal fluidities were close their ratio would be close to 1. In this case the ratio of the fluidities are much less than from 1 as shown in Table F. This experiment was not very successful in measuring the viscosities of mixtures as seen in Table G. The percent differences of these values is incredibly high indicating that this is not a good way to measure the viscosity of a solution. 4

χ χh O Ideal (%) 1.36 0.103 0.8977 0.8410 61.71 1.64 0.331 0.7669 0.7853 108.84 1.55 0.4061 0.5939 0.70 114.68 1.193 0.6458 0.354 0.6495 83.1 0.5656 1.0 0 0.5656 0 Table D: in Ideal calculation of viscosities. χ χh O Ideal (%) 0.7353 0.103 0.8977 1.189 38.16 0.6098 0.331 0.7669 1.7 5.1 0.645 0.4061 0.5939 1.385 53.4 0.8403 0.6458 0.354 1.540 45.4 0.5656 1.0 0 1.768 0 Table E: in Ideal calculation of fluidities. (cp) CRC (cp) % 1.36 0.8 65.4 1.64 0.753 117.8 1.55 0.684 16.6 1.19 0.616 93. 0.5656 0.547 3.40 Table G: Measured viscosities versus the CRC handbook value and percentages of that value. 5