SureStep Pro Linearity Test Kit and Analytical Measurement Range Verification (AMR)



Similar documents
USING CLSI GUIDELINES TO PERFORM METHOD EVALUATION STUDIES IN YOUR LABORATORY

Method Validation/Verification. CAP/CLIA regulated methods at Texas Department of State Health Services Laboratory

Evaluation of Accuracy and User Performance of the TRUE METRIX Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System *

Quality Control of the Future: Risk Management and Individual Quality Control Plans (IQCPs)

Contents. Abstract...i. Committee Membership... iii. Foreword... vii. 1 Scope...1

CAP Point of Care Checklist Frequently Asked Questions Roger D. Klein, MD Sheldon Campbell, MD, PhD Peter J. Howanitz, MD

Advanced Installation & Reference Guide. for OneTouch DataLink Data Management System and OneTouch DataLink Web

Quality Requirements of a Point of Care Testing Service

Samsung POINT OF CARE Systems - Cardiac/Acute Care Biomarkers LABGEO IB Clinical Chemistry Analytes LABGEO PT

SAMPLE. Verification of Comparability of Patient Results Within One Health Care System; Approved Guideline (Interim Revision)

PRINCIPLE. REF (200 tests/cartridge) REF (400 tests/cartridge) ANNUAL REVIEW Reviewed by: Date. Date INTENDED USE

Quick Reference Guide

Quality Assurance for the Clinical Laboratory

Calibration Verification

ASSURING THE QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS

FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY OFFICE OF CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER CITY OF NEW YORK PROFICIENCY TESTING

FDA Public Hearing on Clinical Accuracy Requirements for Point of Care Blood Glucose Meters (BGMs)

For In Vitro Diagnostic Use

An important first step in identifying those at risk for Cardiovascular disease The Accutrend Plus system: from the makers of the ACCU-CHEK and

Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP) Frequently Asked Questions Date: May 5, 2015 (last updated 05/13/2016)

1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan

Intact PTH. system. Intact PTH /R5. Key to symbols used 8K25

HEMATOCRIT/HCT AND CALCULATED HEMOGLOBIN/HB

Accuracy Test Omnitest 3 Blood Glucose Monitoring System. B. Braun Diabetes Care

2. Contact Person: Garo Mimaryan, MS., RAC 7 Technical Regulatory Affairs Specialist III 3. Phone Number: (914)

What Does Having a FDA Cleared Pregnancy Test Mean?

Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry

Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

Biochemistry Validation Form

2010 Laboratory Accreditation Program Audioconference. Accreditation Requirements for Waived Vs. Non-waived Tests

Evaluating Laboratory Data. Tom Frick Environmental Assessment Section Bureau of Laboratories

Urinalysis Compliance Tools. POCC Webinar January 19, 2011 Dr. Susan Selgren

Validation of measurement procedures

510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY

Application Sheet for Rivaroxaban (Xarelto ) Standard Range with. BIOPHEN Heparin LRT (#221011/221013) RUO

Analytical Test Method Validation Report Template

510(K) SUMMARY FEB Submitter: Name of the device: * Common Name: Clinical Chemistry Analyzer (with optional ISE Module) Attachment #2

General. What is a laboratory test? What is a waived test?

SAMPLE. Quality Management System: A Model for Laboratory Services; Approved Guideline Fourth Edition

GUIDELINES FOR THE VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ACTIVE CONSTITUENT, AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICAL PRODUCTS.

ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL Policy and Procedure

Blood Glucose Monitoring: The Facts about Accuracy

Assay Qualification Template for Host Cell Protein ELISA

ANALYTICAL METHODS INTERNATIONAL QUALITY SYSTEMS

Inform II. Quick Reference Guide. for Healthcare Professionals BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING SYSTEM

SAMPLE. Training and Competence Assessment; Approved Guideline Third Edition

CLSI TRAINING COURSES CATALOG

OmniPod. Extension. for the CoPilot Health Management System. Version 1.1. For use with PDM model UST200

College of American Pathologists Accreditation for Public Health Laboratories

SMF Awareness Seminar 2014

Mouse Insulin ELISA. For the quantitative determination of insulin in mouse serum and plasma

Quantifying measurement error from digital instruments

How To Test For Creatinine

TEST REPORT: SIEVERS M-SERIES PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS

Radioanalytical Data Validation Issues and Solutions

Blood Glucose Monitoring Test Systems for Prescription Point-of- Care Use Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

XV.Quality Assurance in the Blood Bank

US Diabetic Devices Industry Research Report: KenResearch

Laboratory Computer Systems

Applying Statistics Recommended by Regulatory Documents

Sentinel I28 and Blackbelt Mass Flow Calibration and Verification

Blood Glucose Monitoring System USER GUIDE. Replaces Owner s Booklet

Assay Migration Studies for In Vitro Diagnostic Devices Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff

A Practical Guide to Internal Quality Control (IQC) for Quantitative Tests in Medical Laboratories

SAMPLE. Effects of Different Sample Types on Glucose Measurements

2009 LAP Audioconference Series. Laboratory Computer Systems

CLIA & Individualized Quality Control Plan (IQCP)

How to Verify Performance Specifications

1. PURPOSE To provide a written procedure for laboratory proficiency testing requirements and reporting.

Who gets you to the next level?

Best Practices for Maintaining Quality in Molecular Diagnostics Gyorgy Abel, MD, PhD

Air Quality Performance Test Guidelines. Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation

510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION DECISION SUMMARY DEVICE AND INSTRUMENT TEMPLATE

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group

TEST METHOD VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION

Guidance for Industry

Abstract... i. Committee Membership... iii. Foreword... vii. 1 Scope Introduction Standard Precautions Definitions...

PRINCIPLE REF ANNUAL REVIEW Reviewed by: Date. Date INTENDED USE

>

To avoid potential inspection

Experiment #1, Analyze Data using Excel, Calculator and Graphs.

This package insert contains information to run the Creatine Kinase assay on the ARCHITECT c Systems and the AEROSET System.

College of American Pathologists Laboratory Accreditation Program. Document Control Management

Ecology Quality Assurance Glossary

Blood Glucose Monitoring System USER GUIDE

APPENDIX 7-B SUGGESTED OUTLINE OF A QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN

IQCP GUIDELINES and TEMPLATE FOR GETTING STARTED

Title: Glucose Testing: StatStrip Glucose Meter Page 1 of 6

ETV Joint Verification Statement

Content Sheet 16-1: Introduction to Documents & Records

Unique Standards and Documentation Required for Accredited CLT/MLT Programs

General Information. Our Background Automated Phone Services Holiday Coverage Licenses & Accreditations

Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) How to Obtain a CLIA Certificate

Accu-Chek Inform II system. Professional glucose testing for the wireless age

PROCEDURE NO. POC LBH. Printed copies are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy for the latest version.

1. What is the critical value for this 95% confidence interval? CV = z.025 = invnorm(0.025) = 1.96

Development of validated RP- HPLC method for estimation of rivaroxaban in pharmaceutical formulation

QA Transactions and Reports

Transcription:

WHITE PAPER SureStep Pro Linearity Test Kit and Analytical Measurement Range Verification (AMR) LifeScan developed the SureStep Pro Linearity Solutions to assist institutional customers in meeting regulatory requirements as well as those of accreditation organizations such as the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and Joint Commission on Accreditation of HealthCare Organizations (JCAHO). LifeScan does not require linearity or AMR testing and the decision to perform this testing should be based on current accreditation and regulatory requirements and your institution s policies. Advantages of SureStep Pro Linearity Solutions SureStep Pro Linearity solutions are appropriate for SureStep Pro and SureStep Flexx meters in that they have test strip lot specific target values that minimize misinterpretation due to test sample matrix. Additionally, they require no sample preparation, have been manufactured so that the glucose is in a stable matrix, and contain five glucose levels that cover a wide concentration range. In addition to linearity testing, SureStep Pro linearity solutions may be used to verify the AMR. The linearity target values may not cover the entire AMR of the method (e.g., 0 to 500 mg/dl) and it is up to each institution to assess if the target values for the low (Level 1) and high (Level 5) linearity solutions meet your institution s needs. These solutions can also be used, depending on your needs, to assess precision, recovery, and use error (competency testing). Using SureStep Pro Linearity solutions to interpret and document the AMR Before using these solutions, assure that the operator performing the test is thoroughly familiar with the correct operation of the system(s) in use and refer to the package insert instructions for limitations and correct handling of these solutions. At least three levels must be used for verifying or validating the AMR (low, mid, and high). 1. Test each level in replicate (a minimum of 2) and calculate the mean value for each meter in use (initial verification). 2. For DataLink Control users, use the Linearity Report option in DataLink Control if desired. (See Appendix A) 3. For those that prefer to document the results manually, record the results on Form A (Form B at altitudes >2000 feet). Note: Use of this form is optional. 4. Compare the results to the acceptance range. If acceptable, document and sign the form. Retain records. If unacceptable, refer to the package insert for recommended actions to take or contact LifeScan customer support. criteria for LifeScan Linearity Solutions are for level 1 and for levels 2-5. The following example provided illustrates how these data may be documented. LifeScan, Inc. Milpitas, CA 95035 AW 089-014A 4/2007 Page 1 of 6

Example: Acceptable Performance All values within acceptable range Target (Target ± ) 40 42 28-52 Y 93 101 74-112 Y 238 230 190-286 Y 380 380 304-456 Y 450 460 360-540 Y Example: Unacceptable Performance Level 1 value is not within acceptable range Target (Target ± ) 40 18 28-52 N 93 95 74-112 Y 238 240 190-286 Y 380 395 304-456 Y 450 460 360-540 Y For those institutions that require a more robust assessment for testing the linearity of a method, the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI previously referred to as the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards or NCCLS) has published voluntary guidelines that provide a number of statistical approaches that may be used. IMPORTANT: While this represents what we believe is the proper interpretation of the requirements, each laboratory is responsible for requirements and checklists specific to its accrediting agency. Individual states may have additional requirements. Local authorities should be consulted as determined by the laboratory director to determine compliance with state/local regulations. This summary reflects information available as of April 2007 and may be superseded by newer regulations and requirements. LifeScan, Inc. Milpitas, CA 95035 AW 089-014A 4/2007 Page 2 of 6

References 1 College of American Pathologists. Commission on Laboratory Accreditation, Point-of-Care- Testing Checklist. 10/2006 2 Sidebottom RA et al. Glucose determinations in plasma and serum: Potential error related to increased hematocrit. Clinical Chemistry 1982;28(1):190-192. 3 SureStep Pro Linearity Test Kit Package Insert AW 052-597-02A, 9/02 4 LifeScan Technical Bulletin Effect of Altitude on Linearity Testing Using the SureStep Pro Linearity Test Kit, AW 050-590-01, 1999. 5 LifeScan Technical Bulletin Linearity AW 054-868A, 6/97 6 NCCLS. Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline. NCCLS document EP6-A (ISBN 1-56238-498-8). NCCLS, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, PA 19087-1898 USA, 200 LifeScan, Inc. Milpitas, CA 95035 AW 089-014A 4/2007 Page 3 of 6

Appendix A - Interpretive Guidelines for AMR Verification using the DataLink Linearity Report When using the DataLink Linearity report for interpreting the Analytical Measurement Range (AMR), refer to the last column in the bottom table. Acceptable criteria for SureStep Pro Linearity Test solutions are for level 1 and for level 2 5 when compared to lot-specific reference (target) values. Example: Acceptable Performance Linearity Report 750 675 600 525 Regression Statistics Summary Table N Slope Intercept Correlation Coeff. SE 10 1.11-13.5 0.99 12.679 Glucose 450 375 300 225 150 75 0 0 75 150 225 300 375 450 525 600 675 750 Glucose Reference Value Linearity Level Test Strip Lot Number Test Strip Exp. Date Reference Value N Mean SD %CV % Difference From Reference Values 1 246418A002 12/2005 48 2 53.7 1.5 2.8% +11.8% 2 246418A002 12/2005 120 2 107.2 5.2 4.9% -10.7% 3 246418A002 12/2005 252 2 261.5 2 8.0% 3.8% 4 246418A002 12/2005 337 2 354.5 12.2 3.4% 5.2% 5 246418A002 12/2005 418 2 466.9 8.1 1.7% 11.7% Level 1: mean within + 12 mg/dl of Ref. value +5.7 mg/dl (Note: Manually calculate mg/dl difference for Level 1) Levels 2-5: mean within + 20% of Ref. value LifeScan, Inc. Milpitas, CA 95035 AW 089-014A 4/2007 Page 4 of 6

SureStep Pro Verification Record Form A Target (Target + ) Target (Target + ) Target (Target + ) Please make copies before use. LifeScan, Inc. Milpitas, CA 95035 AW 089-014A 4/2007 Page 5 of 6

SureStep Pro Verification Record (For use at altitudes > 2000 feet above sea level ONLY) Form B Target Correction Factor New Target (Target + ) Target Correction Factor New Target (Target + ) Target Correction Factor New Target (Target + ) Please make copies before use. LifeScan, Inc. Milpitas, CA 95035 AW 089-014A 4/2007 Page 6 of 6