FWRC. Cooperators: Delta Wildlife, Inc. Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University



Similar documents
CRP Mid-Contract Management Option: Integrated Wildlife Management (645)

Wildlifer 2013 Managing Wildlife on Private Lands

Photo courtesy of the National Wild Turkey Federation NON-GAME GAME

Assume you have 40 acres of forestland that was

Florida Division of Forestry

The Conservation Reserve Program: 45th Signup Results

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Preparing for Success: Waterfowl Habitat Management Annual Planning by Houston Havens

North Carolina State University / USDA-NRCS Wildlife and Water Quality on NC Farms Workshop. Executive Summary

Are My. Pine Trees. Ready To Thin?

Managing Fire Dependent Wildlife Habitat without Fire. A Land Management Practice That: 100 Years of Fire Suppression in Ponderosa pine ecosystems

Integration of Forestry & Wildlife Management

Protecting Your Forest Asset

Techniques and Tools for Monitoring Wildlife on Small Woodlands

Forest Watershed Tree Thinning Restoration Effectiveness Monitoring in the Manzano Mountains of New Mexico

APPLICATION FOR CLASSIFICATION OF FOREST LAND

Consulting Foresters for Private Landowners

4.0 Discuss some effects of disturbances on the forest.

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

Use this diagram of a food web to answer questions 1 through 5.

File Code: Date: June 24, 2013 Subject: Mulberry River Watershed Improvement and Access Project

Wildfire Damage Assessment for the 2011 Southeast Complex Fires

Myre-Big Island State Park

6. NATURAL AREAS FIRE MANAGEMENT

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Use: Cooperative farming as a habitat management tool to enhance and restore refuge grasslands

Restoring Burned Area Fire Regimes at Zion National Park

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

GROWTH POTENTIAL OF LOBLOLLY PINE PLANTATIONS IN THE GEORGIA PIEDMONT: A SPACING STUDY EXAMPLE

Maintaining a Healthy Lawn

Resources, Publications, Tools, Input from AWCC

Fighting Fire with Fire: Can Fire Positively Impact an Ecosystem?

Habitat Requirements of Wildlife: Food, Water, Cover and Space

HFQLG Project Evaluation Form

Northern Long-eared Bat - Interim Final 4(d) Rule Questions and Answers

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HABITAT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM HABITAT ENHANCEMENT AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT FUNDING

HURRICANE IVAN Damage Appraisal & Recovery Efforts. Presentation produced by AFC (Walter E. Cartwright) WEB Address:

PEST MANAGEMENT (CSP Enhancements) January 2006 Enhancement Activity Task Sheet

3.1. Succession, Recovery, and Renewal in Natural Communities. A35 Starting Point. What Happens to a Vacant Lot?

Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Partnership Proposed Demonstration Area A Brief Introduction. Presented by Jeremy Drew Project Manager Resource Concepts, Inc.

USDA Farm Program Agencies

Experienced Planning and Design

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

Rural Flooding: The Potential Role of Forestry

Habitat Management Techniques Flatwoods Salamander. USFWS Recommendations

Collaborative Partnerships and Landscape-Scale Fire Restoration on the Bayou Ranger District in the Interior Highlands of Arkansas, USA

Appendix C. Municipal Planning and Site Restoration Considerations

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Biomass Harvest Guidelines

As stewards of the land, farmers must protect the quality of our environment and conserve the natural resources that sustain it by implementing

Woodlands Management Plan. (Draft June 2011) A. Definition of Woodlands Areas vs. Landscaped Areas of Parkfairfax

High Conservation Value Forests 3.1. Old Growth Forests. Management & Monitoring Framework

DRAFT Addendum to IVM Best Management Practices

Fence Row Herbicide Evaluation: Efficacy of Control

Fire Prescriptions. for Maintenance and Restoration of Native Plant Communities NREM-2878

Fire Prescriptions. for Maintenance and Restoration of Native Plant Communities

Texas Section Society for Rangeland Management

Fayette County Appraisal District

How To Teach A Forest Management Program

Chapter 10 A. Habitat Management Tools: Using Prescribed Fire to Manage Habitats in the Northeast

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL LANDSCAPING AND LAWN MAINTENANCE FIRE DISTRICT NO. 3 TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON MERCER COUNTY

Developing a Prescribed Fire Burn Plan: ELEMENTS & CONSIDERATIONS

Healthy Forests Resilient Water Supply Vibrant Economy. Ecological Restoration Institute

North Carolina s Forestry Present-Use Valuation (PUV) Property Tax Program

Wildlife Surveys. Identifying something? Identifying everything? Looking for specific things? Or just seeing what is there?

Why manage for both? Forest Thinning

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Management Strategies for Rangeland and Introduced Pastures

Objectives. Raster Data Discrete Classes. Spatial Information in Natural Resources FANR Review the raster data model

Blue Creek Fire Natural Resources Recovery Guide

Alaska Forest Pest Control Supplemental Information. Category Twelve

School of Forest Resources and conservation

Restoration of Fire-adapted Ecosystems in the Central and Southern Appalachians

THE CHRISTMAS TREE INDUSTRY IN THE U.S.A. A STATUS REPORT M. L. McCormack, Jr. and Wolfgang Mieder

Deciduous Forest. Courtesy of Wayne Herron and Cindy Brady, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service

Promoting Pollination Farming for Native Bees

FactSheet. Extension. Harvesting and Reproduction Methods for Ohio Forests. Nearly eight million acres of Ohio are forested. These forests F-47-01

Financial maturity is when the rate of value

Deer Exclusion Effects on Understory Development Following Partial Cutting in a Pennsylvania Oak Stand

Chapter 1b - Priority Map Development

Administrative Policy Reminders. Changing Bank Accounts. Civil Rights/Discrimination Complaint Process. Nondiscrimination Statement

Chapter 5. Managing Regenerating and Young Forest Habitat

American Forest Foundation (AFF) Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification

A Landowner s Guide to Forestry in South Carolina

COMING OUT OF CRP. DEPARTMENTAL SPECIAL REPORT #20 February James B. Johnson Walter E. Zidack

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

Increasing water availability through juniper control.

Forest Management Guidelines for the Protection of Four-toed and Spotted Salamander Populations Carol Hall & Bruce Carlson May 2004

Designing in Sustainability in an Utility Scale Photovoltaic Array. Tim Green, Brookhaven National Laboratory Richard Chandler, BP Solar October 2010

Available FSA and NRCS Disaster Assistance Programs Crop Insurance: Prevented Planting and Failed Acreage Considerations Click on title for video

RESTORATION & REVITALIZATION

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

Increasing the Pace of Restoration and Job Creation on Our National Forests

CHECKLIST ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT I. TYPE AND PURPOSE OF ACTION II. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

Conservation Tax Credit Regulations Chapter A-1 RULES OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

Guide to Food Plots. A Practical. In the Southern Great Plains E-1032

Table A1. To assess functional connectivity of Pacific marten (Martes caurina) we identified three stand types of interest (open,

Waterwise Landscaping: Designing a Drought-tolerant (and deer-resistant) Landscape and Garden

Transcription:

Cooperators: Delta Wildlife, Inc. Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks Mississippi Fish and Wildlife Foundation Mississippi Forestry Commission U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service USDA, Farm Service Agency FWRC Mississippi State University complies with all applicable laws regarding affirmative action and equal opportunity in all its activities and programs and does not discriminate against anyone protected by law because of age, color, disability, national origin, race, religion, sex, handicap, or status as a veteran or disabled veteran.

In Mississippi, nearly 1-million acres are enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). However, not all CRP provides good wildlife habitat. Active management of CRP ground cover is essential to produce quality wildlife habitat. Plant communities on CRP fields are not static, but change over time through natural succession. For example, grass stands that have been idle for long periods are susceptible to woody invasion and are characterized by heavy litter accumulation, high stem densities at the ground level, and little bare ground and plant diversity. Invasive plant species such as kudzu and cogon grass reduce the quality of all CRP covers. The USDA cost-shares a number of practices that producers may utilize to improve wildlife benefits and plant diversity in established CRP conservation covers. As pine stands age and the canopy closes, herbaceous ground cover and wildlife forage quality declines. Dense, closed-canopy pine forests in the 10-20 year age range generally provide poor wildlife habitat. High pine stem densities and excessive hardwood midstory competition hinders timber growth and yield. Invasive plant species such as kudzu and cogon grass reduce the quality of all CRP covers. Provision of wildlife habitat is one of the primary objectives of the CRP, and mid-contract management practices can help to ensure that lands enrolled in the CRP provide quality habitat for a diversity of wildlife species.

grassland management practices In the Southeast, plant succession (transition from one community to another, such as annualto perennial-dominated plant communities) progresses rapidly. Periodic soil disturbance with light disking or prescribed fire is essential to maintain good grassland wildlife habitat. However, not all disturbance practices are equal. For example, although mowing or clipping is the most common management practice used on CRP, it can actually be detrimental from a wildlife habitat standpoint. Mowing reduces cover height, accelerates grass succession, and creates a dense litter layer. Mowing should only be used to control brush or for road maintenance. In contrast, the annual weed communities produced by periodic soil disturbance provide essential resources for quail and other early successional species of wildlife. Annual weed communities are characterized by grasses and forbs (especially legumes) that occur following some form of soil disturbance. Some examples of annual plants include ragweed, partridge pea, and panic grasses. These annual plants produce an abundance of seeds used by many birds and mammals. Annual plant communities also support diverse insect communities that provide critical nutrients for nesting birds and growing chicks. Grass-bound CP10 field dominated by perennial grass. Prescribed fire or light disking would improve the plant community for a number of grassland wildlife species. Annual mowing eliminates potential winter cover and nesting cover for the following season. Additionally mowing produces a dense litter layer that impedes movement of ground-foraging wildlife such as bobwhite quail. grassland management

grassland management practices However, annual weed communities are shortlived (lasting only one to two growing seasons). In the absence of further disturbance, plant community composition changes to perennial forbs and grasses, and eventually woody plants. Planned soil disturbances on CRP fields are required to maintain a diverse plant community in a managed landscape. Annual plants such as partridge pea produce an abundance of seeds used by birds and mammals. In Mississippi, USDA cost-shares are available to manage established grass/forb CRP conservation covers. The following practices may be cost-shared: prescribed fire; light stripdisking; interseeding legumes in introduced grass stands; and herbicidal control of invasive vegetation. Cost-shares of 50% of the actual cost of applying the management practice, not to exceed certain limits, may be available for all of these practices. Check with your county Farm Service Agency office to find out current maximum cost-share amounts. Proper planning is important to achieve your conservation goals. Multiple grassland habitat management practices can be utilized together to accomplish specific objectives and achieve greater conservation benefits. CP10 field during summer following a prescribed burn in March. Note the abundant annual weed growth stimulated by the fire. cost-shared mid-contract management practices prescribed fire light strip-disking interseeding legumes in introduced grass stands herbicidal control of invasive vegetation grassland management

grassland management practices Prescribed fire Prescribed fire (or light disking if prescribed fire cannot be used), should be applied every 2-4 years on half to one-third of fields or annually in a rotational strip pattern. Prescribed fire cost-shared through USDA must be conducted in accordance with Natural Resources Conservation Service or Mississippi Forestry Commission practice standards. Currently, the average cost of prescribed fire is about $20 per acre. Light strip-disking To remain in compliance with the soil conservation objectives of the CRP, disking is limited to one-third of the field per year and should be done in a strip fashion on the contour. Light disking should create 50-75% bare ground and leave at least 25% residue. Light disking can be done in either fall or spring. Fall disking tends to stimulate hard-seeded species, including ragweed, partridge pea, and lespedeza. Spring disking tends to stimulate annual grasses. Currently, the average cost of strip disking is about $18 per acre. Fall disked strip Selective herbicide Over time, invasive vegetation can encroach into grass CRP fields. Invasive exotic vegetation (such as kudzu and cogon grass) and woody brush (such as sweetgum) will require herbicidal treatment for long-term control. Control will be more economical and effective if invasive species are treated when they first show up. Cost-shares for herbicide treatments cannot exceed $50 per acre. Interseeding legumes In stands of introduced grasses, interseeding white clover can enhance the stand for some species of wildlife. Clover provides quality forage for wildlife such as deer and rabbits. During spring and summer, clover stands may also provide insect rich foraging areas for birds. Clover should be interseeded into established stands of introduced grasses in a strip fashion on one-third to one-quarter of the acreage. Cost-shares for interseeding perennial legumes cannot exceed $50 per acre. Summer growing season grassland management

woodland management practices Thinning dense pine woods is an excellent way to create pine grassland habitat while improving the economic value of the timber. Unthinned, mid-rotation (10-20 years of age) pine plantations are characterized by dense, closed canopies, little to no grass/forb cover, and substantial accumulation of needles and other debris. Timber and wildlife habitat quality may also be improved in hardwood stands by thinning (as allowed by CRP contract). Thinning woodland stands opens the forest canopy and allows sunlight to reach the forest floor, stimulating development of a grass/forb ground cover and enhancing wildlife habitat value of the stand. Thinning prescriptions should be based on landowner objectives. Heavier thinning is better for grassland wildlife (such as quail) habitat, but the first thinning of CRP pines must leave at least 200 trees per acre. A registered forester can assist you with developing a forest management plan and marketing merchantable timber. Timber thinning cannot be cost-shared, but thinning merchantable timber will usually produce some revenue while improving the structure and growth of the remaining timber stand. During the year of thinning, annual CRP rental payments will not be paid on thinned CRP acres. Unthinned CP11 pine plantation with little herbaceous ground cover provides poor wildlife habitat. These stands should be thinned when trees are merchantable. CP11 pine plantation following fifth row thin, with thinning between the rows. Opening the canopy allows sunlight to reach the forest floor, stimulating herbaceous ground cover growth. woodland management

woodland management practices Many CRP pine contracts in Mississippi were developed to convert 10-20% of pine stands to forest openings. These openings may also be managed by prescribed fire or strip disking and herbicidal treatment as necessary. Hardwood brush encroachment in a pine plantation. Grassland habitat in these stands can be restored with application of selective herbicide followed by prescribed fire. cost-shared mid-contract management practices prescribed fire or light disking in pine stands light disking in forest openings herbicidal control of invasive woody vegetation in pine stands herbicidal control of invasive exotic vegetation in pine and hardwood stands In Mississippi, USDA cost-shares are available to manage established woodland CRP conservation covers. The following practices may be cost-shared: prescribed fire or light disking in pine stands; light disking in forest openings; herbicidal control of invasive woody vegetation in pine stands; and herbicidal control of invasive, exotic vegetation in pine and hardwood stands. Cost-shares of 50% of the actual cost of applying the management practice, not to exceed certain limits, may be available for all of these practices. Check with your county Farm Service Agency office to find out current maximum cost-share amounts. Proper planning is important to achieve your conservation goals. As with grassland habitat management practices, multiple woodland habitat management practices can be utilized together to accomplish specific objectives and achieve greater conservation benefits. woodland management

woodland management practices Prescribed fire Prescribed fire (or light disking along thinned rows if prescribed fire cannot be used), along with thinning, is essential to maintain grassland plant communities within pine woodlands. Pine stands may be managed with prescribed fire every 2-4 years. Prescribed fire cost-shared through USDA must be conducted in accordance with Natural Resources Conservation Service or Mississippi Forestry Commission practice standards. Currently, the average cost of prescribed fire is about $20/acre. Selective herbicide If hardwood species are abundant in the understory or midstory of pine stands after thinning, treat these stands with the selective herbicide imazapyr. The combination of selective herbicide and fire is often called Quality Vegetation Management. Both pine and hardwood stands are eligible for treatment with selective herbicides to control invasive, exotic vegetation such as privet or kudzu. Herbicide treatments cannot exceed $50 per acre per year. Light strip-disking Light strip-disking is limited to one-third of forest openings or one-third of rows between midrotation aged pines per year. Woodland stripdisking is not as efficient as prescribed fire, but can be an effective tool for early successional habitat management where prescribed fire is not an option. Take care not to disk too deeply, which could injure tree roots, or otherwise damage trees with equipment. Currently, the average cost of disking is about $18/acre. CP11 pine plantation following thinning, Light strip-disking along a thinned pine burning, and selective herbicide. plantation row. woodland management

Technical Assistance period. For contracts that exceed 10 years, the Landowners can apply for mid-contract cumulative limit is $125 per acre. management practices at any time. However, it is important to note that these mid-contract A written wildlife habitat management plan management practices must be incorporated can greatly improve your chances of achieving into your conservation reserve program contract your wildlife management objectives. A wildlife and management plan. Contract holders must biologist can provide valuable assistance with modify their Conservation Plan of Operation planning and implementing these practices (CPO) to reflect the timing, frequency, and for wildlife habitat. Contact the FSA office at extent of approved your county USDA Service Center for more practices. This requires visiting your county information about USDA Service Center, describing to the Farm practices for established CRP conservation Service Agency (FSA) personnel the suite of covers. Contact information for your local FSA management practices you wish to apply, and field office can be found at www.fsa.usda.gov or developing a prescription and schedule of by contacting the state office at 601.965.4300. activities. This prescription and schedule will be incorporated into your contract CPO. The FSA personnel will involve the Natural Resources Conservation Service district conservationist and/or Mississippi Forestry Commission forester to provide technical guidance in developing an approved CPO. Prescribed burning should be conducted by or under the supervision of a certified prescribed burn manager. Light stripdisking and prescribed fire should be limited to October-February to produce desirable annual weeds and grasses. No management activities can be applied during the primary nesting period of April 1-August 15. Total cost-share payments for may not exceed $50 per acre per year or $100 per acre for the entire 10-year CRP contract

The following agencies are available to provide wildlife and forest management planning or technical assistance: Natural Resources Conservation Service Area 1 (Northeast Mississippi) Wildlife Biologist John DeFazio, 662.534.7651 Forester Lynn Ellison, 662.844.2341 Area 2 (Central Mississippi) Wildlife Biologist Jeffrey Lee, 601.965.4559 Forester Ramsey Russell, 601.965.4559 Area 3 (South Mississippi) Wildlife Biologist Barry Pessoney, 601.296.1173 Area 4 (Delta) Wildlife Biologist Kevin Nelms, 662.453.7841 Mississippi Forestry Commission Visit www.mfc.state.ms.us/ or contact the state office at 601.359.1386 to obtain contact information for your county Mississippi Forestry Commission office. Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks Dave Godwin, 662.325.5119 Mississippi Fish and Wildlife Foundation Daniel Coggin, 662.256.4486 Randy Browning, 601.296.1173 Delta Wildlife, Inc. Trey Cooke, 662.686.3372 Mississippi State University, Forest and Wildlife Research Center Wes Burger, 662.325.8782 Rick Hamrick, 662.325.5470 A complete list of eligible technical assistance providers can be found at techreg.usda.gov State office State Wildlife Biologist Glynda Clardy, 601.965.4339 Forester Alan Holditch, 601.965.4339 Photographs courtesy of: L. Wes Burger, Jr. Stephen J. Dinsmore Joe Mac Hudspeth USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service