Downtown Core Sub-district



Similar documents
Revere Beach Transit-Oriented Development Parcels Revere, Massachusetts. Design and Development Guidelines. Part Two.

Guiding Principles. McCauley Area Focused Urban Design Plan. 1 Connect: Chinatown and Little Italy with downtown and surrounding areas

1. Land Use. Chapter 1: Land Use 1-1 Adopted 10/2/09 Amended 3/22/11, 8/16/11

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary 1-3. Introduction 4-6. Illustrative Site Plan 7. East-West Streets 8. Cooper Street Market Street 11-14

DOWNTOWN AND NEIGHBORHOODS

BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE

Rapid City Downtown Area Master Plan. Draft Plan Concepts April 2016

DIVISION STREET CORRIDOR STRATEGY Arlington, Texas May 17, 2012

Land Use and Zoning. Land Use Within the Port Madison Indian Reservation

AMENDED OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, VILLAGE DOCKLANDS PRECINCT, 2-46 BATMANS HILL DRIVE, DOCKLANDS

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)

Schenk-Atwood Neighborhood Business District Master Plan

Opal Service District Plan

Near West Side Comprehensive Plan Executive Summary (Revised) April 2004 City of Milwaukee DCD

STAFF REPORT. December 20, North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

ASSESSMENT OF LANDCAPE PROVISIONS FOR PROPOSED PLAN CHANGE 1. Inner Business Zone. Outer Business Zone PALMERSTON NORTH CITY COUNCIL

TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC Rutherglen Cary, NC

Citizen Advisory Group Meeting #1 December 8, :00 p.m.

PLANNING FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT AT THE COTTONWOOD MALL SITE

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

315 First Ave NE Minneapolis, MN 55413

The Lancaster Medical District Master Plan. The Lancaster Campus District 1

Education, Entrepreneurship & Urban Revitalization

Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update

BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY CENTER REDEVELOPMENT PLAN SUMMARY

Nine Story, LEED Certified Class A Office Building ONE SUMMERLIN Festival Plaza Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89135

Welcome to our exhibition

S U S TA I N A B L E C O M M U N I T I E S : EAST NEW YORK

Draft Goals and Objectives Wadena Comprehensive Plan City of Wadena, Minnesota. Land Use Goals:

Topic 2 11/28/2012 Blocks & Street Network

05 AREA/SITE SPECIFIC GUIDELINES

How To Develop The Kingsgate Business Centre

Supplementary Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. in this chapter. 8.1 Overview of Economic Conditions. 8.2 Priority Economic Development Needs

Deep Ellum Crossroads Redevelopment Project

HARRIS TEETER AT LADY S ISLAND CITY OF BEAUFORT DRB CONCEPTUAL PROJECT NARRATIVE Submittal Date: September 2, 2015 Meeting Date: September 10, 2015


CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AGENDA REPORT

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014

Market Summary. prepared by FXM Associates 6.1. North River Canal Corridor

CITY COUNCIL PACKET MEMORANDUM


ARTICLE VIII SECTION 8.1 O-I OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION NOTICE INVITING EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (EOI)

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Between THE CITY OF BALTIMORE And THE MID-ATLANTIC FEDERAL PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

Planning for the future. building a great city, great neighbourhoods

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

City of Tampa Zoning Districts

Scenario Planning Report. Austin South Shore Central

# U N I V E R S I T Y A V E N U E S P E C I F I C P L A N Page 1-1 # 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.1 University Avenue, Historical Context

P u b l i c. Development Proposal And Rezoning

Scheme 3: Rehabilitation of Heritage Building and Redevelopment

NDC Academy 2015 Creative Financing Small Business Entrepreneurship

Shaping Whanganui. Have your say, korero mai

Creative Place-Making & Adaptive Reuse

Corridor Goals and Objectives

21.04 LAND USE. Managing amenity through land use strategies

WEST MISSION AVENUE SPECIFIC PLAN (Council Approved 11/5/03 - Resolution R)

Tall Building Design Guidelines Status Update

Downtown Community Planning Council Meeting offebruary 18, 2015

Land Use Element. Introduction 2.3. A Citywide Land Use Policies 2.3. A-1 The Future Land Use Map & the Location of Zones 2.3. A-2 Uses 2.

Parkway Forest Context Plan

Smart Growth Illustrated: Developer s Guidebook. City of Bentonville Community Development Department October 2006

3655 Kingston Rd - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

A PPENDICES C OLLIERVILLE 2040 LAND USE PLAN UPDATE

GARFIELD BOULEVARD. concept planning 54TH PL CALUMET AVE ELLSWORTH DR CTA STATION STUDY AREA GAS STATION GARFIELD BLVD PRAIRIE AVE

DEVELOPMENT BRIEF FOR LAND AT ALLOA ROAD, TULLIBODY

Zoning Guide* Contents. Section I Introduction page 2. Section II Residence Districts page 3. Section III Commercial Districts page 5

Presentation: Proposed Plan Amendments

Eagle Commuter Rail Denver, Colorado Final Design (Based upon information received by FTA in November 2010)

OAKLAND PARK COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. DEVELOPMENT and RELOCATION INCENTIVE PROGRAM

Fordham University Lincoln Center Campus

Rezoning case no. RZ15-08: Adam Development Properties, LP

PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN MASTER PLAN

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District STE 14 OZ and STE 14 RH

Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project San Diego, California New Starts Project Development (Rating Assigned November 2014)

CITY OF FLORENCE NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STRATEGY SECOND PUBLIC MEETING

West Ashley Strategic Plan

Appendix C Related Studies

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

Frederick. Frederick. Maryland. Smart Growth Successes. Frederick. Maryland Department of Planning

property introduction

Prepared by: Samuel Dennis Date prepared: December 21, 2011

Transcription:

3-10 Land Use Downtown Core Sub-district District development will be most intense and most urban in character in the Downtown Core. The objective is to establish this area as a citywide and regional retail and entertainment destination. Uses may include retail, office, entertainment, lodging and residential uses, but the emphasis will be on retail and entertainment uses that complement and enhance the direction established by existing entertainment uses north of San Marcos Boulevard. Residential and office uses will occupy upper stories to enhance around-the-clock activity and the viability of the core. Development will be structured around the new east-west Main Street and a series of north-south cross-streets that will allow commercial uses to extend from San Marcos Boulevard south to the Creekside Promenade. Building entries and transparent storefronts will be oriented to attractive pedestrian-oriented streets enhanced with public amenities and active uses, such as sidewalk cafes. Highest intensity uses will occur in the Downtown Core. Figure 3-3 depicts the scale and character envisioned for development in the Downtown Core. This illustration shows what the street scene along Main Street and the Town Center Plaza might look like at buildout. The Town Center Plaza, located at the center of the Downtown Core, is intended to be a vibrant pedestrian space that is framed and activated by surrounding development.

Figure 3-3: Downtown Core Sub-district Concept Illustration Land Use 3-11

3-12 Land Use Creekside Sub-district The Creekside sub-district provides the transition between the creek open space amenity and urban development to the north. The Creekside Promenade and the adjoining parks and open space corridor represent the Creekside District s primary amenity, and both uses and built form will respond to it. Uses may include a mix of retail, entertainment, lodging and residential, with the emphasis being on uses that enhance and benefit from the adjacent promenade and creek corridor. The land use emphasis will vary along the length of the corridor in response to adjoining development to the north. Thus, in the area south of the Downtown Core, creekside development will be more commercial (retail, entertainment, lodging) in character, whereas in the area south of the Midtown sub-district, development may have a more residential character. Development in the sub-district will maintain a dual orientation, with buildings fronting on and addressing Creekside Drive while also providing both physical and visual access to the adjacent open space amenities. Development frontages adjoining the promenade and associated park spaces will incorporate semipublic and private plazas, terraces and open space areas that augment the public promenade and include active uses such as restaurants with outdoor dining. The Creekside Sub-district will provide a transition from urban development to the creek corridor parks and open space. Figure 3-4 illustrates the scale and character envisioned for the Creekside Sub-district. The illustration depicts smaller-scale development along Creekside Drive with one of the Creekside Promenade plazas in the foreground. Parts of the Creekside Sub-district, such as south of the Midtown Sub-district, may be more residential in character.

Land Use 3-13 Figure 3-4: Creekside Sub-district Concept Illustration

3-14 Land Use Bent Avenue Center Sub-district Bent Avenue is an important gateway to the Creekside District, particularly from uses to the southeast such as Cal State San Marcos. The sub-district will be a commercial center that serves the eastern portion of the District and provides a complementary, but distinctly different land use character from the Downtown Core. Uses may include retail, office, entertainment, lodging, and residential, but the emphasis will be much less on entertainment and lodging than in the Downtown Core. The sub-district may evolve to have a specific commercial focus. One possible scenario envisioned for the area is that it may become a design center that specializes in retail (e.g., furniture, lighting, housewares, galleries, etc.) and service (e.g., interior design, architecture, landscape architecture, etc.) businesses that deal with home improvements. Ground-floor uses will include primarily retail and other pedestrian-oriented uses, while residential and office uses will occupy upper floors. The intersection of Bent Avenue and Main Street will be the heart of the sub-district and buildings will front on both corridors. As in the Downtown Core, building entries and transparent storefronts will be oriented to attractive pedestrian-oriented streets enhanced with public amenities and active uses, such as sidewalk cafes. Figure 3-5 depicts the scale and character envisioned for the Bent Avenue Center Sub-district as seen from East End Commons park facing east. The Bent Avenue Center Sub-district could evolve into a design center, such as the Cedros District in Solana Beach, CA (top) or Fourth Street in Berkeley, CA (bottom).

Land Use 3-15 Figure 3-5: Bent Avenue Center Sub-district Concept Illustration

3-16 Land Use Midtown, East End, and West End Sub-districts The character envisioned for the Midtown, East End and West End sub-districts will vary somewhat in response to their particular settings, but will generally be quite similar to each other. Uses may include retail, office, entertainment and residential, but the mixed-use setting is likely to include a higher proportion of residential uses and local service and office uses that support and complement the adjoining commercial center, and fewer destinationtype retail and entertainment uses. Residential uses may occupy ground floors as well as upper floors, including live/work lofts that provide strong street-front orientation and accommodate groundfloor retail or galleries. Development generally will have a lower, more intimate scale, but will still provide a strong orientation to and definition of the public realm. Similarly, streetscape design generally will be simpler, and the pedestrian zone will be more intimate and include fewer active uses and storefronts. The Midtown, East End, and West End Sub-districts will be more residential in character.

Land Use 3-17 3.2.4 Redevelopment and Revitalization GOAL 3.3: Enhanced economic potential of the District resulting from the revitalization and redevelopment of existing underutilized, outdated, and/or nuisance uses or businesses. Policy 3.3.1: Encourage the replacement of existing non-conforming uses with uses that will contribute to the creation of a vibrant, pedestrian-oriented, mixeduse district. The Plan recognizes that the Creekside District is not a blank canvas, but rather a complex mixture of existing businesses, numerous and diverse-sized parcels, and many different landowners. By necessity, the transition from the existing mixture of retail, service and industrial uses and underutilized lands to a vital mixeduse district will be gradual. While many of the existing uses will remain for the foreseeable future the City will not force existing, legally-operating uses to leave the District it is assumed that ultimately, as the character of the area improves and land values increase, that uses that are not consistent with the vision for the District (e.g., industrial uses) will voluntarily relocate and/or be replaced by development that better captures the enhanced economic potential associated with the new mixed-use district. Policy 3.3.2: Encourage the introduction of a more compact and intense pattern of development that maximizes the development potential of the District and supports City objectives for economic viability and place-making. The City has many reasons for encouraging the redevelopment of the Creekside District with development that is both more compact and higher intensity. Compact, higher intensity development supports the concept of a vibrant and active downtown, both because of the number of people it will attract to the area and the positive retail synergy that develops from a concentration of complementary uses. The concentration of people and uses also supports the objective of creating a park once, pedestrian-oriented district, and enhances the District s ability to support regular and frequent transit service that is a viable alternative to the private automobile. Finally, the increased development potential will help support the investment in new infrastructure such as flood control improvements and new bridges, as well as the extensive park, open space, and streetscape improvements that will make the Creekside District the unique destination envisioned. Policy 3.3.3: Encourage infill and redevelopment along San Marcos Boulevard that will improve the corridor s economic vitality, enhance the definition and character of the corridor, and create better pedestrian scale and orientation. While San Marcos Boulevard will continue in the near term to function as a predominantly auto-oriented commercial corridor, the development in the rest of the District is expected to be an impetus for change along this street frontage. The corridor currently consists of predominantly strip commercial uses that include an inordinate number of convenience retail outlets that are dependent on drive-by or impulse shopping. New development of vacant and underutilized lots, and redevelopment of currently developed parcels, should be used to incrementally reconfigure and revitalize the street frontage. Redevelopment of currently developed parcels will be a long-term and incremental process that will be driven by market forces rather than City regulation. As new development in the area begins to improve the character and economic vitality of the area, it is anticipated that existing developments will want to upgrade or redevelop in order to remain competitive.

3-18 Land Use From a land use perspective, these changes involve a transition from predominantly auto-oriented, convenience uses to more destination-type uses. The intent is to both diversify the economic base and to add uses that will attract people to the area, rather than just opportunistically capturing pass-by dollars. Such uses need not be just retail, but can also include office and professional service uses. Creation of a broader and more protected pedestrian environment with pedestrian connections to the development areas to the south. Refer to the design guidelines and development standards in Chapters 6 and 7 for the techniques that will be used to achieve these changes. In terms of development character, the redevelopment of the street frontage is intended to enhance the overall image of the area, creating a more positive entry statement for new development proposed south of the boulevard. To a great extent, the success of planning area development that does not front on San Marcos Boulevard will be dependent on creating a positive first impression along San Marcos Boulevard. The effect of the existing strip commercial development pattern on the physical environment is one of fragmentation caused by driveways and parking lots, an array of signs competing for the driver s eye, and predominantly single-story structures that are not in scale with the boulevard. The physical character of District development is addressed in more detail in Chapter 6, Community Design and Chapter 7, Form-Based Code. In general, key physical changes encouraged along San Marcos Boulevard include: Development of taller buildings that are more in scale with the wide boulevard, Creation of a more consistent building setback that places buildings closer to the street in order to give better definition to the public right-of-way, Relocation of parking lots to the rear of buildings and in parking structures, Reduction in the number, and eventual phasing out, of private driveways with direct access from San Marcos Boulevard, and San Marcos Boulevard will evolve into a more consistent, inviting, and pedestrianoriented corridor.