ExpressLanes CAG Summit. March 2, 2010



Similar documents
110 EXPRESSLANES PERFORMANCE UPDATE, AS OF 2/28/13

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination Attachment A

MOUNTAIN HOUSE MASTER PLAN CHAPTER TEN AIR QUALITY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

An Overview of Managed Lanes in the U.S.A. Darren Henderson, AICP

HOT Lanes in Houston Six Years of Experience

The New Mobility: Using Big Data to Get Around Simply and Sustainably

Welcome Letter 3. ExpressLanes Overview 4. How It Works 6. FasTrak Entry/Exit and Toll Point Locations 8. FasTrak Mounting Instructions 10

College of Southern Maryland. Hughesville Transportation Study

Appendix E Transportation System and Demand Management Programs, and Emerging Technologies

When is BRT the Best Option? 1:30 2:40 p.m.

Los Angeles Metro Rapid

INNOVATIONS AND CHALLENGES IN TOLLING MANAGED AND EXPRESS LANES

City of Santa Barbara City Vehicle Use Policy

Technical Report Documentation Page. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-13/

Congestion Management Systems: A Federal Perspective. 7 Key CMS Components

ITS Georgia Presentation Mike Holt, PE, PTOE World Fiber Technologies January 28, 2011

Transportation Management Toolbox Strategies

Policy Research CENTER

Doing a little can accomplish a lot. Proposed Change of Municipal Class Environmental Assessment from Schedule from B to A+

Commuter Choice Certificate Program

1. REPORT CONTEXT Description of the development (include all of the following that are known at the time of the application):

5 Performance Measures

Transportation Management Plan. for. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapter 6 Twin Cities Travel Demand Forecast Model and Forecast Guidelines

APPENDIX A Dallas-Fort Worth Region Transportation System Management Strategies and Projects

Preliminary Investigation Caltrans Division of Research and Innovation

ExpressPark - An Intelligent Parking Management System for Downtown Los Angeles

7.0 TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

Performance Measures for RIDOT s Traffic Management Center

FY16 Budget Public Forum. Saturday, April 25, 2015

rail Transit Improvements - The I-66 Corridor

Who is implementing managed lanes with pricing strategies? Operational Under Construction/ Development

MEMORANDUM. Robert Nichols, Acting Corridor Design Manager Northgate Link Extension

14,449. Atlanta / Beaumont / Lufkin / Paris / Tyler Region. How was the survey taken? Do you own or lease a personal vehicle?

Establishing a Metropolitan Network of Congestion-Free Freeways

How To Plan A City Of Korea

SUMMARY OF GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT TRENDS For THE CENTRAL AREA OF CHICAGO. The Parking Industry Labor Management Committee (PILMC)

Qualified Transportation Expense Benefit Plan. Featuring etrac Card Technology


Houston Managed Lanes Case Study: The Evolution of the Houston HOV System

Ne w J e r s e y Tr a f f i c Co n g e s t i o n :

Stone Way N Rechannelization: Before and After Study. N 34th Street to N 50th Street

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE 2009 TRANSPORTATION GRANT APPLICATION PACKET

City of Rockville Regional Development Impacts: Transportation Capacity Analysis. June, 2013

Technical Report 4: Congestion Management Process Final Plan for Adoption October 2015

7.0 Transportation Management

Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Public Workshop #2. September 12 and 23, 2013

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

J. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla Transportation Demand Management Plan

OM-13: Transportation Management and Operations

ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Discussion. Presented to ARC Bike/Ped Plan Equity Advisory Group July 29 th, 2015

{insert employer} Employee Transportation Survey

Growth of Addis Ababa

Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There?

RECEIVE AND FILE EXPRESSLANES MARKETING PLAN

Goals & Objectives. Chapter 9. Transportation

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND EVALUATION MEASURES

Tax-Free Commuter Benefits For Employers & Employees

Figure L3: Level 2 SR 99 Elevated Light Rail Alternative Detail - 1 of 4

From the FTA 5310 Circular (C9070.1F): 1. ELIGIBLE CAPITAL EXPENSES. Funds for the Section 5310 program are available for capital expenses as defined

MANAGED LANES: THE NUTS AND BOLTS

If previous box was checked, enter Master Account Number

Subject: Presentation - TTC/Transportation Services Joint Surface Transit Initiatives

Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures

Measuring the Street:

A Framework for Monitoring the Performance of Travel Demand Management and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Reduction Activities

The financial plan was prepared in conjunction with the Technical Working Group. Refer to Table 3-1: Funding and Implementation Plan.

Alameda County Transportation Commission GUARANTEED RIDE HOME. ALAMEDA County Transportation Commission PROGRAM GUIDELINES

CITY OF DES MOINES COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION PLAN

Study of Transportation Long-Range Funding Solutions. Report to the Legislature

Transportation Alternatives

Research Results Digest 352

GTA Cordon Count Program

FINAL REPORT DEVELOPMENT OF CONGESTION PERFORMANCE MEASURES USING ITS INFORMATION. Sarah B. Medley Graduate Research Assistant

Monitoring Program Results and Next Steps

2012 King County Metro Transit Peer Agency Comparison on Performance Measures

Traffic Signal Priority (TSP) and Automatic Vehicle Tracking System (AVTS) For Calgary Transit Buses

Chapter 9: Transportation

EMPLOYEE USE OF PRIVATELY-OWNED VEHICLES

DATA QUALITY VISUALIZATION TOOLS ON ARCHIVED HISTORICAL FREEWAY TRAFFIC DATA

Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision

Master Transportation Plan Demand and System Management Element. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Transportation System Management (TSM)

6. Cost Summary and Analysis This chapter summarizes and analyzes the cost estimates from previous chapters.

Travel Demand Management & Travel Behavior Change

APPLICATION BOOKLET FOR OPENING A NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY COMMERCIAL CHARGE ACCOUNT

Living After Stroke: Mobility and Transportation Options After Stroke. The Family of Community Transportation Options

ATTACHMENT K 5310 ELIGIBLE COST

Toll ring around Oslo: How car owners help paying for improved mobility, and better environment too

MANAGEMENT PLAN. Fiscal Year

Maximizing Mobility in Los Angeles

University of Guelph Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan Changing Our Travel Habits 2009/ /20

Why Talk About Transport in Africa? SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRANSPORT IN AFRICA: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES. Urbanization and Motorization in Africa

Employer Transit Benefits Toolkit. Brought to you by godcgo

5.0 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES

Transportation Resources

2011 Boulder Valley Employee Survey for Transportation Report of Results

Needs Analysis. Long Beach Bicycle Master Plan. Bicycle Commuter Needs. LONG BEACH BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Needs Analysis

5 Tips to Improve Biking in San Francisco

30 Years of Smart Growth

Transcription:

ExpressLanes CAG Summit March 2, 2010 1

Project Goals Move More People, Not More Vehicles > Increase Throughput of HOT lanes > Effectiveness (Mode Shift) > Efficiency (Cost of Project Relative to Benefits) > Equity (Address Impact on Low Income Commuters) > Educate Community (Extensive Community Outreach) > Execute as a Demonstration Project (One Year) 64 separate cars 2

Project Budget ($291 Million) Transit Facility Park & Ride Lot Improvements, Station Expansion, Maintenance Facility Transit Operations New Buses, Dual Hub BRT, Vanpools Express Park Parking Management Toll Technology & Infrastructure Bottleneck Improvements, Additional HOT Lane 3

New Bicycle Lockers ARTESIA TRANSIT CENTER EL MONTE TRANSIT CENTER 4

I-110 at Adams Blvd (North Terminus) 5

Adams Blvd Pedestrian Plaza (Concept) 6

I-10 El Monte Busway Bottleneck Majority of westbound HOV traffic exits at I-710 Add one additional HOT lane in each direction between I-710 and I-605 Minor widening Design exceptions are required 7

New Project Schedule Description 2010 2011 2012 Pomona (North) Metrolink Station Acquire 59 Clean Fuel Buses Transit Signal Priority Downtown LA Harbor Transitway Improvements Phase 1 Harbor Transitway Improvements Phase 2 ExpressPark El Monte Transit Center Patsaouras Plaza Connector Promote Vanpools Increase BusService ExpressLanes Open I-10 2 nd HOT Lane & I-110 Adams Blvd Improvements 8

Concept of Operations ExpressLanes Demonstration I-110 Harbor Transitway Lanes Only Business Rule SOV Pay HOV 2+ Free I-10 El Monte Busway Lanes Only All electronic open road tolling Dynamic, segmented pricing assembled by trip Dedicated Enforcement CHP Officers Dedicated Incident Response Tow Trucks SOV Pay HOV-2 Pay: Peak Hours (5am 9am; 4pm 7pm) HOV-2 Free: Off-Peak Hours HOV 3+ Free All Hours Ingress/Egress Same as Current HOV access Transponders for all vehicles in ExpressLanes 9

Toll Rates > Minimum Toll per Mile: $0.25 > Maximum Toll per Mile: $1.40 > Toll Rates will vary within the range based upon demand. > The Toll Rate is based on traffic levels in the ExpressLanes to ensure 45 mph. > Maximum toll represents a Price to Discourage More Entry rather than generate additional revenue. > Avg Peak Toll (End to End) I-10 is $6; I-110 is $4 10

Electronic Toll Collection Used to effectively manage lanes (less labor intensive than toll booths) & prevents back-up queuing on roadway Works with all existing toll facilities in California All users pay toll via pre-paid account No automatic ability to identify carpoolers/vanpoolers (only visual) 11

Transponder Upgrade Can Self -declare Vehicle Occupancy SOV HOV 2 HOV 3+ Allows carpoolers/vanpoolers to be automatically identified so don t get charged toll Used to reduce cheaters thereby protecting carpoolers and vanpoolers Requires a pre-paid balance to off-set charges when not carpooling 12

Administrative Account Fees Purpose: Address Costs Incurred by MTA associated with Issuing a Transponder for each Vehicle & there is a Cost Associated for Maintaining a Toll Account. 3 Types of Fees > Account Set-Up/Establishment - One Time Only > Account Replenishment - User Generated > Account Administrative Service - Per Occurence Methodology Fiscal Responsibility Tailor to LA County Comparison to other HOT lanes in California 13

Account Establishment One Time Account Establishment Credit/Debit Card Proposed Metro - Standard Proposed Metro - Low Income Commuters Prepaid Toll Balance Credit/Debit Card $ 40.00 $ 40.00 Transponder Deposit Credit/Debit Card Waived Waived Low Income Toll Credit Discount Not Available $ (25.00) Total Cost for Account Establishment $ 40.00 $ 15.00 Account Establishment - Cash/Check Prepaid Toll Balance - Cash/Check $ 50.00 $ 50.00 Transponder Deposit - Cash/Check $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Low Income Toll Credit Discount Not Available $ (25.00) Total Cost for Account Establishment $ 75.00 $ 50.00 14

Account Replenishment User Generated Account Replenishment Credit/Debit Card Proposed Metro - Standard Proposed Metro - Low Income Commuters Minimum Balance - Threshold $ 10.00 $ 10.00 Replenishment Amount $ 40.00 $ 40.00 Account Replenishment - Cash/Check Minimum Balance Threshold $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Replenishment Amount $ 50.00 $ 50.00 15

Account Administrative Services Proposed Metro - Standard Proposed Metro - Low Income Commuters Non-User Fee per Transponder (monthly)* $ 3.00 Waived Per Occurrence Transponder Replacement Fee $ 35.00 $ 35.00 Defective/Malfunctioning Transponder No Charge No Charge Credit/Debit Card Declined Fee $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Returned Check Fee $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Negative Balance Fee $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Forced Account Closing Fee $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Return Transponder in Good Condition $ (25.00) $ (25.00) * Fee is Waived if use ExpressLanes at least 4 times per month whether SOV or carpooling. 16

Low Income Commuter Assessment Required by State Law Findings > Threshold - $35,000 Annual HH Income > Consider Waiving Account Set-Up/Establishment Fees > Minimum Account Balances & Consequences of Going Below Them > Minimum Monthly Usage Charges for Low Activity Accounts > Distribution Network for Transponders > Performance Measures > Transit Riders Benefit Substantially from $70 M Investment & Increased Transit Service 17

Low Income Commuter Assessment Proposed Mitigation > $25 Credit to Qualifying Low-Income HH for Account Set- Up/Establishment Fees that can be Applied to Transponder Deposit or Pre-paid Toll Balance > Waive the Monthly $3 Non-User Fee > Limit Eligibility to LA County Residents, 1 per Household Address > Alternative Options for Unbanked Customers (Prepaid Visa TAP Card) > 1 st in the State to Offer Low Income Discount/Toll Credit 18

Impact of Toll Credit/Discount A Driver Will Choose to Pay the Toll if it is Lower than His/Her Value of Time on that Occasion. > Model Shows that Without a Toll Credit/Discount, there would be No Situations where a Low Income Commuter would Choose to Pay a Toll > With the $25 Toll Credit/Discount, Low Income Drivers would be induced to Pay during Certain Times/Directions: I-10 WB Morning Peak (SOV & HOV2) I-10 WB Evening Peak (SOV & HOV2) I-110 NB Morning & Evening Peak I-110 SB Evening Peak > Waiving Monthly Non-User Fee Addresses Low-Income Commuter Traditional Behavior of Low Activity on HOT lanes 19

We Want to Hear From You > Public Hearings, March 9 & 10 > Live Stream, Twitter, Facebook > March 17, Ad Hoc Congestion Pricing Committee > March 29, Deadline for Written Public Comment (DEIR) > April 22, Metro Board > Transponder Distribution Plan 20