Page 1 of 18 28.4.2008 Sven Alexander Last revised 1.3.2010. SB-Produksjon STATICAL CALCULATIONS FOR BCC 250



Similar documents
Design MEMO 54a Reinforcement design for RVK 41

Design MEMO 60 Reinforcement design for TSS 102

RC Detailing to Eurocode 2

FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE

Detailing of Reinforcement in Concrete Structures

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

Concrete Design to Eurocode 2

Tension Development and Lap Splice Lengths of Reinforcing Bars under ACI

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

HPM Rebar Anchor Bolt. For bolted connections. Technical Manual. European Technical Approval ETA-02/0006. Version: Peikko Group 01/2015

The following sketches show the plans of the two cases of one-way slabs. The spanning direction in each case is shown by the double headed arrow.

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P

Design Manual to BS8110

16. Beam-and-Slab Design

HOW TO DESIGN CONCRETE STRUCTURES Foundations

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

Chapter 8. Flexural Analysis of T-Beams

HUS-V Screw anchor. HUS-V Screw anchor. Basic loading data (for a single anchor) Mean ultimate resistance

DESIGN OF SLABS. Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

Seismic design of beam-column joints in RC moment resisting frames Review of codes

PPM High-Strength Anchor Bolt

Problem 1: Computation of Reactions. Problem 2: Computation of Reactions. Problem 3: Computation of Reactions

EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR TECHNICAL APPROVALS

Technical handbook Panel Anchoring System

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

IMPROVING THE STRUT AND TIE METHOD BY INCLUDING THE CONCRETE SOFTENING EFFECT

Local buckling of plates made of high strength steel

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Guidance to developers of software for the design of composite beams

Technical Application Document. Hilti HIT-RE 500-SD

HUS-A 6 / HUS-H 6 / HUS-I 6 / HUS-P 6 Screw anchor in precast prestressed hollow core slabs

Stresses in Beam (Basic Topics)

ANALYSIS FOR BEHAVIOR AND ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CORBELS WITH HYBRID REINFORCEMENT

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

PERFORMANCE OF SLABS REINFORCED BY PEIKKO PSB STUDS

Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures

Design of reinforced concrete columns. Type of columns. Failure of reinforced concrete columns. Short column. Long column

Chapter 5 Bridge Deck Slabs. Bridge Engineering 1

STRUSOFT EXAMPLES PRE-STRESS 6.4

Introduction. Eurocodes. Specification. Cost

New approaches in Eurocode 3 efficient global structural design

S03: Tier 1 Assessment of Shear in Concrete Short Span Bridges to AS 5100 and AS 3600

Hilti HIT-HY 150 MAX with rebar

Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

Copyright: European Concrete Platform ASBL, May 2008.

Structural Design Calculation For Pergola

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 1 STRESSES IN BEAMS DUE TO BENDING. On completion of this tutorial you should be able to do the following.

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:

Shear Forces and Bending Moments

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE - FACULTY OF LAND RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING -BUCHAREST

Structural welding is a process by which the parts that are to be connected are heated and

Standards, Codes and Regulations

Concrete Frame Design Manual

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

European Technical Assessment ETA-10/0153 of 10/06/2015

Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 8000 PRECAST CONCRETE

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES OUTCOME 2 ENGINEERING COMPONENTS TUTORIAL 1 STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

SEISMIC RETROFITTING TECHNIQUE USING CARBON FIBERS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS

Full-Scale Load Testing of Steel Strutting System. For. Yongnam Holding Limited

EDEXCEL NATIONAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA MECHANICAL PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS NQF LEVEL 3 OUTCOME 1 - LOADING SYSTEMS TUTORIAL 3 LOADED COMPONENTS

Joist. Reinforcement. Draft 12/7/02

Numerical modelling of shear connection between concrete slab and sheeting deck

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

A N Beal EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES - worked examples 1

Standards, Codes and Regulations

FOUR-PLATE HEB-100 BEAM SPLICE BOLTED CONNECTIONS: TESTS AND COMMENTS

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW TEST FOR DETERMINATION OF TENSILE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE BLOCKS

9.3 Two-way Slabs (Part I)

Section 5A: Guide to Designing with AAC

Design and Construction of Cantilevered Reinforced Concrete Structures

USE OF CFRP LAMINATES FOR STRENGTHENING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE CORBELS

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

Index Series Prestressed Florida-I Beams (Rev. 07/12)

Foreword. This manual provides technical information for designers and contractors to design and plan the construction operation.

The following excerpt are pages from the North American Product Technical Guide, Volume 2: Anchor Fastening, Edition 16.

Solid Mechanics. Stress. What you ll learn: Motivation

Optimising plate girder design

October ICS Supersedes ENV , ENV , ENV , ENV , ENV and ENV

BSF and BCC beam connections

Karol Bzdawka Composite Column - Calculation Examples

Hilti HIT-HY 200 with rebar

Aluminium systems profile selection

Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013

HUS-HR, CR Screw anchor, stainless steel

REPAIR AND STRENGTHENING OF HISTORICAL CONCRETE BRIDGE OVER VENTA RIVER IN LATVIA

Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Design and Structural Assessment

Section 16: Neutral Axis and Parallel Axis Theorem 16-1

Structural Forensic Engineering Case Study : MRR2 Project. Prof. Dr. Azlan Abdul Rahman Forensic Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

AISI CHEMICAL COMPOSITION LIMITS: Nonresulphurized Carbon Steels

Transcription:

Page 1 of 18 CONTENT PART 1 BASIC ASSUMPTIONS PAGE 1.1 General 1. Standards 1.3 Loads 1. Qualities PART ANCHORAGE OF THE UNITS.1 Beam unit equilibrium 3. Beam unit anchorage in front..1 Check of capacity.. Anchorage.3 Beam unit anchorage of the horizontal force 6.3.1 Check of capacity 6.3. Anchorage length 6. Column unit anchorage in the column 7..1 Check of capacity 7.. Anchorage of the bolts 7 PART 3 - REINFORCEMENT 3.1 Beam reinforcement in the rear 7 3. Beam shear stirrups 7 3.3 Beam check of shear compression 7 3. Column splitting stress 7 3.5 Conclusion reinforcement in the beam 8 PART DESIGN OF STEEL UNITS.1 Equilibrium of knife 9. Design of knife.3 Beam unit transverse bending of top flange of rectangular tube 1. Beam unit transverse bending of bottom flange of rectangular tube 1.5 Column unit equilibrium 15.6 Column unit bending of plates 16.6.1 Bottom plate 16.6. Top plate 17.7 Conclusion steel units 18

Page of 18 PART 1 BASIC ASSUMPTIONS 1.1 GENERAL In these calculations certain assumptions has been made about dimensions and qualities in the precast concrete elements that may not always be the case. Therefore the following calculations of anchorage of the units and the resulting reinforcement must be considered as an example to illustrate the calculation model. In beams it must always be checked that the forces from the anchorage reinforcement can be transferred to the beam s main reinforcement. The recommended shear reinforcement (stirrups) includes all necessary stirrups in the beam end; i.e. the normal shear reinforcement in beam ends and an addition due to the cantilever action of the beam unit from the beam. The information found here and in the memos assumes that the design of the elements and the use of the units in structural elements are carried out under the supervision of a structural engineer with knowledge about the flow of forces. 1. STANDARDS The calculations are carried out according to: Eurocode : Design of concrete structures. Part 1-1. General rules and rules for buildings. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures. Part 1-8: Design of joints. EN 080: Steel for the reinforcement of concrete. Weldable reinforcing steel. General. For all NPDs in the Eurocodes the recommended values are used. These NDPs are: In EC : γ c ; γ s ; α cc ; α ct ; k 1 ; k and Ø m,min. In EC 3: γ M0 ; γ M1 and γ M. 1.3 LOADS Vertical ultimate limit state load = F V = 50 kn Horizontal ultimate limit state load = F H = 0,3 F V = 75 kn The design is carried out with a horizontal force of 30 % of the vertical force. Recommended capacity for transfer of active forces (as wind loads) may be assumed to be 0 % of smallest vertical load present at the same time. 1. QUALITIES Concrete grade C5/55: f cd = α cc f ck /γ c = 1,0 5/1,5 = 30,0 MPa f ctd = α ct f ctk,0,05 /γ c = 1,0,/1,5 = 1,80 MPa f bd =,5 η 1 η f ctd =,5 1,0 1,0 1,80 =,05 MPa Reinforcement B500C: f yd = f yk /γ s = 500/1,15 = 35 MPa Tension in threaded bars: 8.8 quality steel: f yd = f y /γ M = 60/1,5 = 51 MPa Nominal diameter (mm) M M1 M16 M0 M M30 M33 M36 Equivalent diameter (mm) 8,6, 1,1 17,7 1, 6,7 9,7 3,6 Stress area (mm ) 58 8 157 5 353 561 69 835 Structural steel S355: Tension and compression: f yd = f y / γ M0 = 355/1,00 = 355 MPa < f u /γ M = 5/1,5 = 08 MPa Shear: f sd = f y /(γ M0 3) = 355/(1,00 3) = 05 MPa f 1 5 1 Welds: u f vw d = = 6 γ 3 β 1,5 3 0,9 MPa M w

Page 3 of 18 PART ANCHORAGE OF THE UNITS.1 BEAM UNIT - EQUILIBRIUM R CO a = 55 150 95 17 30 117 l co/ Rectangular tube 160x80x5, L = 5 d d 1 l cu/ Threaded bar M16 F H 5 5 95 0 60 50 5 F H F V a = 513 1 Figure 1. Designations and assumed dimensions. R CU Neglecting the moment created by the small vertical shift in the transfer of F H. R CU = F V d 1 /d R CO = F V + R CU l CU = R CU /(f cd b) (b is the width of the beam unit) l CO / is decided by the location of the front reinforcement. Assume -Ø1: l CO / = +(8 1+3 8)/ = 78 mm d 1 = a 1 a +l CO / d = a l CO / l CU / Use a spread sheet. Assume d 1 /d, calculate resulting d 1 /d. Change assumed value until they are equal. (Spread sheet Equilibrium-BCC50-beam-unit.exc.) Equilibrium of BCC 50 beam unit: Concrete grade = C 5 /55 Material coefficient for concrete = 1,5 Geometry: a 1 = 51 3 mm f cd = 30,0 MPa a = 5 5 mm Width of the beam unit = 80 mm F V = 50 kn l CO / = 78 mm Assumed d 1 / d = 0,3807731 R CU = 95 kn d 1 = 136 mm 3 R CO = 5 kn d = 357 mm l CU = 0 mm Calculated d 1 /d = 0,3807731

Page of 18. BEAM UNIT ANCHORAGE IN FRONT..1 Check of capacity A s,reqd = R CO /f yd,reinf = 35/0,35 = 793 mm Assumed -Ø1 = 113 = 90 mm ok.. Anchorage In order to achieve equilibrium in the joint where the reinforcement bringing R CO down is anchored, the same amount of reinforcement must be supplied horizontally in order to carry a 5º compression diagonal (strut and tie model). Select -Ø1 U-shaped stirrups. As illustrated in the left section in figure it will be congested if the beam has minimum dimensions. This must be taken into account when the anchorage length of the horizontal U- shaped bars is calculated. (The main reinforcement of the beam is not shown in the side view.) Select to check the anchorage for a situation as illustrated in the right hand section in figure. According to EC clause 8..: l bd = α 1 α α 3 α α 5 l b,reqd l b,min 00 (minimum) 00 (minimum) 35 Ø σ sd 1 0,90 l b,reqd = = = 83 mm f,05 bd l b,min = max(0,3 l b.reqd ; Ø; 0 mm) = mm Figure. Anchorage of front reinforcement. 95 Anchorage in the node: Lower bars: c = 5+15+5 = 65 mm Upper bars: c = 65+15+15+15 = 1 mm U-shaped anchorage: c d = c = 65 mm > 3 Ø = 36 mm ; i.e. α 1 = 0,7 Concrete cover: α = 1-0,15 (c d -3 Ø)/Ø = 1-0,15 (50-3 1)/1 = 0,85 Confinement by reinforcement: Assume transverse reinforcement in the anchorage zone to be -Ø1 bars (see figure 5): 113 0,5 113 α 3 = 1 K λ = 1 0,05 = 0,813 Confinement by welded transverse reinforcement: α = 1,0 Confinement by transverse pressure: α 5 = 1,0 113 α α 3 α 5 = 0,85 0,813 1,0 = 0,671 < 0,7 i.e. use 0,7. l bd = 0,7 0,7 1,0 83 = 139 mm No contribution to the anchorage is required from the main reinforcement in the beam.

Page 5 of 18 Anchorage for lap splicing with the main reinforcement in the beam: Straight bar: α 1 = 1,0 Concrete cover: c d = min(a/; c 1 ; c) = min(8/; 5+15+5+15; 5+15) = mm α = 1 0,15 (c d Ø)/Ø = 1 0,15 (-1)/1 = 0,85 Confinement by reinforcement: Assume transverse reinforcement Ø1-c/c 80 mm (see figure 5): 113 0,5 113 α 3 = 1 K λ = 1 0,05 80 = 0,881 113 Confinement by welded transverse reinforcement: α = 1,0 Confinement by transverse pressure: α 5 = 1,0 α α 3 α 5 = 0,85 0,881 1,0 = 0,75 > 0,7 l bd = 1,0 0,75 1,0 83 = 1 mm Minimum total horizontal length of the U-shaped bars = 139+1 = 351 mm It must always be checked that the beam s main reinforcement has sufficient anchorage at the end of the horizontal part of the front anchorage. This will probably lead to much greater lengths for the horizontal part of the front anchorage than calculated here. It is recommended to make sure the anchorage lengths always are ample in order to avoid anchorage failures, as anchorage failures normally will be brittle failures. Compressive strut: According to EC, clause 6.5. and 6.5..c): = 1-5/50 = 0,8 σ Rd,max = k 3 f cd = 0,75 0,8 30 = 18,5 MPa F cd = R CO = 35 = 88 kn Required concrete area = 88 3 /18,5 = 6373 mm Height of compressive strut is at least equal to the anchorage length = 139 = 197 mm Required beam width = (6373/197)+80 = 1 mm width of BCC unit

Page 6 of 18 a End of horizontal part of front anchorage. z x x 1 Center og gravity of the beam s main reinforcement Main reinforcement in the beam Figure 3. Anchorage of the beam s main reinfocement. a FV x1 The force is approximately [ FV FH z + + ]. Additional force in the beam s top z x reinforcement is about [ F H ], but this force leads to a reduction in the compressive z stresses and may be neglected. If there is a large distance between the horizontal part of the front anchorage and the beam s main reinforcement, the length of the horizontal part of the front anchorage must be increased with this distance. (This distance is approximately zero in the figure.).3 BEAM UNIT ANCHORAGE OF HORIZONTAL FORCES.3.1 Check of capacity F H = 75 kn (see clause 1.3) A s,reqd = 75/0,51 = 16 mm (see clause 1.) M16 threaded bar (157 mm ) is assumed - ok.3. Anchorage length l bd = α 1 α α 3 α α 5 l b,reqd l b,min No information exists on the bond characteristics of threaded bars. Assume η 1 to be 0,7. 75 Ø σ sd 16 0,157 f bd =,5 0,7 1,0 1,80 =,8 MPa; l b,reqd = = = 673 mm fbd,8 l b,min = max(0,3 l b.reqd ; Ø; 0 mm) = 0 mm Straight bar: α 1 = 1,0 Concrete cover: c d = min(a/; c 1 ; c) = min(50/; 0; 0) = 5 mm α = 1 0,15 (c d Ø)/Ø = 1 0,15 (5-16)/16 = 0,916 Confinement by reinforcement: Assume transverse reinforcement Ø1-c/c150 mm: 300 113 0,5 113 α 3 = 1 K λ = 1 0,05 150 = 0,91 113 Confinement by welded transverse reinforcement: α = 1,0 Confinement by transverse pressure: α 5 = 1,0 l bd = 1,0 0,916 0,91 1,0 1,0 673 = 560 mm Recommended length 666 mm (18 pieces from a 1 m bar).

Page 7 of 18. COLUMN UNIT ANCHORAGE IN THE COLUMN..1 Check of capacity M = F H (15+/)+F V [(/)-35] = = 50 (0,3 6+0) = 1950 knmm S = 1950/5 = 7,96 kn A s = 7,96/0,51 = 16 mm M at the top is ok (see table in clause 1.) F H S = 0,3 50 8 = 67 kn A s = 67/0,51 = 131 mm M16 in the bottom is ok.. Anchorage of the bolts See separate calculations: Design of anchorages used in the BCC units. See also Memo 7. PART 3 REINFORCEMENT 3.1 BEAM REINFORCEMENT IN THE REAR A s,reqd = R CU /f sd = 95/0,35 = 18 mm, corresponding to 18/( 113) = 0,96; i.e. 1 Ø 1 stirrup. 3. BEAM SHEAR STIRRUPS Use a strut-and-tie model with compressive diagonals at 5º. The shear force within the central part of the beam unit is assumed to be R CO = 35 kn. Assume z = 300 mm and stirrup diameter Ø1. s = A sw z f ywd cot θ/v s = 113 35 300 cot 5º / 35 3 = 85 mm Select Ø1 c/c 80 mm. This reinforcement should be brought approximately 00 mm past the end of the beam unit in order to absorb any splitting effects from the anchorage of the threaded bar. 3.3 BEAM CHECK OF SHEAR COMPRESSION Assume beam width of 00 mm and beam depth of 50 mm. (See also clause..) This means that z min 50 50 0 = 300 mm with one layer of reinforcement in the top of the beam and three layers in the bottom. The shear reinforcement is calculated based on 5º compressive field. The check of shear compression will be carried out under the same assumption: V Rd,max = α cw b w z υ 1 f cd /(cot θ + tan θ) V Rd,max = {1,0 (00 80) 300 0,6 [1 (5/50)] 30,0/(cot 5º+tan 5º)} 3 V ccd = 531 MPa > 35 MPa - OK 3. COLUMN SPLITTING STRESS Splitting stress under the column unit according to EN 199-1-1, clause 6.5.3: 1 300 T = FV = 0,19 50 = 8 kn 300 A S = 8/0,35 = 1 mm -Ø stirrups ( 78,5 mm ) are sufficient. 5 M threaded 80 insert 65 15 190 50 35 5 5 5 M16 threaded insert Figure. Assumed dimensions. Equilibrium of the column unit.

Page 8 of 18 3.5 CONCLUSION REINFORCEMENT IN THE BEAM For show the beam end reinforcement more clearly, the beam s main reinforcement is not show in the side view. Between the shown stirrups in each end of the beam a normal calculation of the shear reinforcement must be carried out. The main reinforcement in the beam must of course also be calculated. 1-Ø1-P. as support 7-Ø1-P.-c/c 80 for top reinforcement -Ø1-P.1 1-Ø1-P. stirrup extra by the end of the beam unit -Ø1-P.3 Theraded bar M16 -Ø1-P.1 9-Ø1-P. -Ø1-P.3 At the end of the horizontal part of the front anchorage (P.3) it must be checked that the beam s main reinforcement has sufficient anchorage. See clause... Figure 5. Reinforcement in the beam end.

Page 9 of 18 PART DESIGN OF STEEL UNITS.1 EQUILIBRIUM OF KNIFE R VO 55 R l / HO o Rectangular tube 160x80x5, L = 5 d d 1 l u / h 1 = h-xt = 160-x5 = 150 R HU Threaded bar M16 F H 5 5 95 75 5 60 50 R VU F V Figure 6. Equilibrium of knife. F V d 1 + F H h 1 = R VU d + R HU h 1, dvs. F V d 1 +F H 150=R VU d +R HU 150 F V + R VU = R VO ; F H = R HO + R HU For R VU is f yd reduced with about 5% to 66 MPa due to the rounding of the tip of the knife. l o = R VO / (f yd t k ) = R VO / (0,355 5) = 0,117 R VO l u = R VU / (f yd t k ) = R VU / (0,355 0,75 5) = 0,150 R VU d 1 = (5 ) + 5 + + l o / = 58 + l o / d = (95+75) l o / l u / = 3 l o / l u / R HU = 0,3 R VU R HO = F H R HU F V d 1 +0,3 F V 150=R VU d +0,3 R VU 150 F V (d 1 +5)=R VU (d +5) R VU = F V (d 1 +5) / (d +5) R VO = F V + F V (d 1 +5)/(d +5) = F V [1 + (d 1 +5)/(d +5)] Use a spread sheet. Assume (d 1 +5)/(d +5), calculate resulting (d 1 +5)/(d +5). Change assumed value until they are the same. (Spread sheet Equilibrium-BCC50-knife.exc.) F V = 50 kn F H = 75 kn Assumed (d 1 +5)/(d +5) = 0,3900 R VU = 78 kn R HU = 3 kn R VO = 38 kn R HO = 5 kn l o = 37 mm d 1 = 76 mm l u = 1 mm d = 36 mm Calculated (d 1 +5)/(d +5) = 0,3900

Page of 18. DESIGN OF KNIFE 37 51 kn 90 80 38/37 = 8,86 kn/mm 117 t = 5 17 30 5 5 0 50/5 = 5,56 kn/mm 1 78/1 = 6,50 kn/mm 1 75 kn x Figure 7. Forces on the knife. 50 kn 0 x 5: 5 x : h = 30+117x/ = 30+1,67x h = 30+1,67x-1 = 18+1,67x V = 5,56x; N = 75x/5 = 1,667x V = 50; N = 75 x 75 30 + 1,67x M = 5,56 + x 5 M = 50(x )+75[1+(18+1,67x)/] M =,78x + 0,83x(30 + 1,67x) M = 31x 395 x 80: 80 x 117: h = 17 h = 17 V = 50; N = 75 V = 50 8,86(x 80); N = 75 51(x 80)/37 M = 50(x )+75 17/ M = 50x+13 8,86(x 80) /+(51/37)(x 80)(17/) M = 50x+13 M = 50x+13,3(x 80) +1(x 80) 117 x 3: h = 17 V = 50 38 = 78 kn; N = 75 51 = M = 50x+13 38(x 98,5)+51 17/ = 360 78x W = 5 h /6 =,17 h ; A = 5 h Design plastic shear resistance = V pl,rd : V pl,rd = A v (f y / 3)/γ M0 =h 5 (0,355/ 3)/1,00 = 5,1 h; For V/V pl,rd 0,5 the effect of shear on the moment resistance may be neglected. σ M = N/A + M/W

Page 11 of 18 x h V N M V pl,rd A V/V pl,rd W σ M (mm) (mm) (kn) (kn) (knmm) (kn) (mm ) (mm 3 ) (MPa) 0 30 0 0 0 15 750 0,00 3750 0 67 1 37 563 3 1669 0,36 18559 160 5 5 50 75 955 538 69 0,6 6069 36 5 93 50 75 115 77 39 0,5 3615 31 55 1 50 75 1335 56 76 0, 5079 91 65 17 50 75 16355 68 316 0,39 6679 69 135 50 75 17915 691 3373 0,36 7585 59 17 50 75 17513 753 3675 0,33 90038 15 75 17 50 75 18763 753 3675 0,33 90038 9 80 17 50 75 0013 753 3675 0,33 90038 3 80 17 50 75 0013 753 3675 0,33 90038 3 0 17 73 7 561 753 3675 0, 90038 93 1 17-16 3 6556 753 3675-0,0 90038 30 117 17-78 6935 753 3675-0, 90038 306 117 17-78 69 753 3675-0, 90038 306 150 17-78 3 753 3675-0, 90038 77 00 17-78 0 753 3675-0, 90038 3 3 17-78 7 753 3675-0, 90038 87 < 0,5 < 355 - ok - ok

Page 1 of 18.3 BEAM UNIT TRANSVERSE BENDING OF TOP FLANGE OF RECTANGULAR TUBE Room for P. stirrup in front 50 mm 0 mm (115 kn) (30 kn) 7 (39, kn) 150 (88,8 kn) a) Forces acting on the front of the beam unit 50 0 55 p p 3 35 35 5 30 p 1 5 50 5 b) Forces on the front plate 115 = 1,533 kn/mm 75 Contact area 5x37 mm Assumed fracture lines (bending up) 178-115 =31,5 kn,5,5,5,5 Assumed fracture lines (bending down) 5 178 = 7,1 kn/mm 5 c) Possible fracture lines 35-115 75 =3,067 kn/mm d) Forces on the front part of the reinforcing plate 35-115 =115 kn e) Forces on the rear part of the reinforcing plate Figure 8. Reinforcing of top flange. The knife will come to rest partly against the front plate and partly against the rectangular tube (figure 8a). The front plate with a thickness of mm can absorb (38/37) = 88,6 kn of R VO. The remaining 38-88,6 = 39, kn will be carried by 37- = 7 mm of the rectangular steel tube (based on l o in spread sheet in clause.1). Some of this will be transferred back to the front plate through the weld between the front plate and the reinforcing plate. Considering the upper 55 mm of the front plate as a beam, the forces on the front plate will be as shown in figure 8b. Based on the stress capacity of the smallest section of the front plate: p 1 = 0,355 = 3,55 kn/mm Contact area between the knife and the front plate: p = 5 0,355 = 88,8 kn /35 =,536 kn/mm

Page 13 of 18 Remaining capacity of the front plate: p 3 =,536 35 3,55 5 = 88,8 kn / = 1,68 kn/mm Moment at the center line of the beam : 0 35 5 1 1 M =,536 35 3,55 1,68 = 1831kNmm W req d = 1831/0,355 = 5157 mm 3 W el = 55 /6 = 50 mm 3 W pl = 55 / = 7563 mm 3 OK Required weld size between front plate and reinforcing plate = 1,68/0,6 =,8 mm Select 5 mm throat value. The forces must be transferred from the front plate to the tube through welds on the vertical sides of the tube: Required throat value = 88,8 3 /[6 (160-)] =,3 mm Select mm throat value. The slight moment created in the front plate by the distance between the welds and the center of gravity of the beam s support reactions are taken by the front plate in diaphragm action. Conservatively assume that only 150 kn is carried by the front plate, instead of p 1 +p 3 = 3,55 5+88,8 = 177,5 kn, as calculated here. The remaining load, R VO -150 = 38-150 = 178 kn, must be carried by the front part of the reinforcing plate. As a simplified model it is assumed that this is carried by 50 mm of the reinforcing plate as a one-way slab supported on the tube walls. Possible fracture lines are shown in figure 8c. This force is counteracted by the uniformly distributed reaction from the concrete on the reinforcing plate. Since only 1/3 of the reinforcing plate is considered, the force must be 1/3 of R CO = 35/3 = 115 kn. Forces are shown in figure 8d. Maximum moment: 75 5 1 75 1 M = 31,5 7,1 + 1,533 = 13kNmm W req d = 13/0,355 = 797 mm 3 W el = 50 (0 +5 )/6 = 35 mm 3 W pl = 50 (0 +5 )/ = 5313 mm 3 OK Weld between reinforcing plate and tube = 31,5 3 /(6 50) =, mm Select mm throat value.

Page 1 of 18 The rear of the reinforcing plate must carry the compressive stress caused by R CO. If the grouting of the tube is neglected (see figure 8e): Maximum moment: 75 75 1 M = 115 3,067 = 156kNmm W req d = 156/0,355 = 6077 mm 3 W el = 0 (0 +5 )/6 = 8 mm 3 W pl = 0 (0 +5 )/ = 66 mm 3 OK The welds are executed with reserve capacity to compensate for possible deviating force distribution.. BEAM UNIT TRANSVERSE BENDING OF BOTTOM FLANGE OF RECTANGULAR TUBE 5 78 = = 39 kn 78 5 80 75 = 3,1 kn/mm 5 78 = = 39 kn M = 39 75/ 3,1 (5/) / M = 119 knmm Req d. W = 119/0,355 = 333 mm 3 Try 0 mm width of plate (in the longitudinal direction of the beam unit): 0 (5 +t u )/6 = 333 t u = 13, mm Select t u = 15 mm t U Figure 9. Reinforcing of bottom flange. The weld: Req d. a = 39 3 /(6 0) = 1,5 mm Select weld with throat measure a = mm.

Page 15 of 18.5 COLUMN UNIT - EQUILIBRIUM 5 FH 15 190 65 50 F V 35 5 F H Assume bottom plate to be mm. A c0 = = 900 mm Partially loaded area: Assume smallest relevant column dimension to be 300 300 mm. A c1 = = mm f ' cd = 30,0 900 Assume top plate to be 80 mm. Assume concrete compressive stress to be the same on bottom plate and cantilevering part of top plate: Area of bottom plate = = 900 mm Area of top plate = 15+50 5 = 350 mm = 750 mm Concrete compressive stress = 50/7,5 = 3,5 MPa 80 15 15 5 Figure. Assumed geometry of column unit. 300 115 115 A c0 A c1 3x= A c0 A c1 Figure 11. Load distribution in column. = 51,9 < 3,0 30,0 = 90 MPa 5 65 Center of gravity y 5 15 + 5 50 (65 + ) y = 15 + 5 50 = 38 mm Bottom plate carries 900 3,5 = 169 kn Top plate carries 350 3,5 = 81 kn 15 50 80 15 Figure 1. Cantilevering part of top plate.

Page 16 of 18.6 COLUMN UNIT- BENDING OF PLATES.6.1 Bottom plate 6 63 cg Center of gravity s a cg = 63 /( 63+6) cg = 3 mm F V 8 cg=3 P 81 kn F W 63 35 63-cg = 0 F V = 50 kn P s,max y = 38 Figure 13. Equilibrium of bottom plate. / = 35 169 kn 35 Equilibrium: 81 (38 35) = P {[8 (3/3)]+[35 (0/3)]} P = 5,8 kn 0 σ s,max (1/) = 5,8 3 σ s,max = 36 MPa << 355 MPa OK F w,ed,max = 36 = 15 N/mm a = 15/6 = 0,6 mm; Select a = mm 8 1,5 5,5 Design bottom plate for transverse bending for the average compressive stress (see figure 13). Consider a section 1 mm wide: σ s = σ s,max / = 36/ = 18 MPa Force in the weld in the section = 18 = 7 N 7 N x t 7 N 50/(5x5)= N/mm 16 0 x 8: M = M 1 = 3,5 x / 8 x,5: M = M 1 +7 (x 8) = M 1 +M,5 x 35: M = M 1 +M (x,5)/ = M 1 +M M 3 W = M/355 = t /6; dvs. t = (M/59,17) 3,5 N/mm Figure 1. Forces on the bottom plate. Use a spread sheet: BCC50-col-unit-bot-pl.exc. x (mm) M 1 (Nmm) M (Nmm) M 3 (Nmm) M (Nmm) t (mm) 0,0 0 0 0 1,0 8 88 77 7,5 8733 0 9777 13 5,0 781 1 69 1131 1 7,5 1305 775 1167 1 30,0 1555 158 6 865 1 3,5 180 176 110 888 1 35,0 1131 19 173 573 Select t = 15 mm

Page 17 of 18.6. Top plate M = 3,5 13 / = 915 Nmm W reqd = 915/355 = 8,1 mm 3 t = (8,1 6) = 7,0 mm Select t = mm The weld: F w = 3,5 15 = 518 N/mm 80 13 5 13 t 3,5 N/mm 3 67 a = 518/6 =,0 mm Select a = mm t 3,5 N/mm Figure 15. Forces on the top plate.

Page 18 of 18.7 CONCLUSION STEEL UNITS 300 80 17 30 117 5 5 1 t = 5 50 KNIFE 5 150 5 5 55 95 30 Plate 150xx0 0 Rectangular tube 160x80x5, L = 5 18 Plate 0x0x Threaded insert M16 xx60 Plate 0xx15 95 0 60 BEAM UNIT Bolt M Threaded insert M 18x18x50 80 The length of the bolts depends upon column dimensions. Bolt M16 15 190 65 50 Ø Threaded insert M16 xx60 Figure 16. Steel units. COLUMN UNIT