RSNA 2012 Refresher Course 721B, Chicago, Nov. 30, 2012 Concepts for High-Resolution Low-Dose CT of the Breast Disclosures WAK is founder, shareholder and CEO of CT Imaging GmbH, Erlangen, Germany. Willi A. Kalender, Ph.D. Institute of Medical Physics University of Erlangen www.imp.uni-erlangen.de Motivation Prior art Goals Necessary technology Expected performance of dedicated high-resolution low-dose breast CT Plans for (pre-)clinical evaluation Performance of mammography 90 % of patients could be cured if disease were in breast detectedcancer at a very screening: early stage, 70 % if the malignant lesion in the breast Sensitivity is still smaller 62% - 88% than 1 cm. (Stockinger, Source: Günther: Carney Katastrophe et al. Annals of Internal Medicine 2003 für die Frauen, Der Spiegel, Nr.15 Performance of mammography (2002), S. 203) in breast cancer screening: Sensitivity 63% - 78% Source: Report and metanalysis of state-of-the-art breast cancer screening and monitoring approaches. Dep. of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam 2009 Projection image vs. CT image (in the same patient) Unfortunately, a mammogram, like other radiographs, is a two-dimensional planar image with inherent limitations in identifying three-dimensional lesions, particularly in the relatively homogeneous soft tissues of the breast. Hall F. Radiology 2008; 247(3):597-601 All structures along a ray are superpositioned and may obscure important details. Images: Courtesy of Michael Lell, Erlangen Only the structures in the section of interest are displayed. Seite 1 1
Dedicated Announced and patented by GE as CT (CTM) in the 1970s Scan time: 1 min; Slice thickness: 1 cm; Contrast: 300 ml Chang et al., Cancer 46, 939 946 (1980) Dynamic MDCT can be used in the evaluation of selected patients with suspected breast tumours. Perrone A et al. AJR 2008; 190:1644-1651 Dedicated breast CT scanner at UC Davis (since about 2005) Several research groups active in the USA at present. Cone-beam CT geometry Images: Courtesy of John Boone, UC Davis Prionas Boone. Radiology 2010; 256:714-723 Results: Overall, CT was equal to mammography for visualization of breast lesions. was significantly better than mammography for visualization of masses (p<0.002); mammography outperformed CT for visualization of microcalcifications (p<0.006). Conclusions: Some technical challenges remain, but breast CT is promising and may have potential clinical applications. Innovative breast CT must offer full 3D imaging capabilities high spatial resolution (100 µm or better) for the detection of microcalcifications good soft tissue delineation dynamic scanning for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions dose levels similar to screening mammography integrated biopsy facility absence of painful compression Lindfors KK, Boone JM et al. Radiology 2008; 246:725-733 Seite 2 2
High-resolution CT Micro-CT scan of surgical specimens Contrasts in breast tissue DCIS specimen * embedded in parafin kv Approx. CT values (HU) Adipose (mean) Tumor (mean) Calcification (e.g.) 40-440 -180 8200 60-400 -160 6000 80-350 -100 5000 Micro-CT 40 µm resolution * Specimen provided by M. Beckmann, Erlangen gland - fat ~ 200 HU gland calcification > 5000 HU @ 40 µm resolution 20 mm Dose assessment by Monte Carlo methods CT 120 kv 60 kv 14 cm diameter 30 kv 4.5 cm thickness Determination of 3D dose distributions by simulations is established and confirmed by measurement. They apply to breast CT, mammography and tomosynthesis in equal manner. Motivation Prior art Goals Necessary technology Expected performance of dedicated high-resolution low-dose breast CT Plans for (pre-)clinical evaluation scanner concept single-circle flat detector Transition from to spiral CT detector Photon-counting energy-discriminating CdTe detector 100 % geometrical and absorption efficiency Photon counting CdTe detector Project consortium: CT Imaging GmbH, Erlangen / D IMP, U of Erlangen, Erlangen / D XCounter AB, Danderyd / S Novak T, Schilling H, Kalender WA. Patent application 2009 Curved detector built up scalable of discrete CdTe tiles with 100 µm pixel size Count rate: 10 8 ph./mm²/s Frame rate: 1000 proj./s Two thresholds for energy discrimination Detection efficiency and geometric efficiency close to 100% (exceeding the performance of today s CT detectors) Seite 3 3
Scintillator Detection principles Scintillator (structured) Direct converter Spatial resolution Simulations Measurements System Resolution Modes for analysing microcalcifications 5 lp/mm of lead bars resolved Photodiode + Transistor array Photodiode + Transistor array Transistor array Point Spread Functions (PSF) Modes for analysing soft tissue lesions October 2011: First experimental confirmation that the sensor performs as expected. Simulation results for breast CT Phantom 14 cm diameter 10 cm length 2 mm 5 mm 1 mm Soft-tissue lesions 100 µm 200 µm Dedicated CT of the breast 150 µm Microcalcifications Scan parameters 2 s / 2000 proj. / 360 100 µm FS / Dose: 3 mgy AGD Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Kalender WA et al. Eur Radiol 2012 ; 22(1):1-8 σ = 19 HU σ = 630 HU (150 µm)³ voxel size (50 µm)³ voxel size Patient- and biopsy-friendly gantry Demands Comfortable patient positioning with coverage of the full breast and the axilla Variable table height (ca. 70-170 cm) Sequential and spiral scanning (25 cm in 12 s) Easy access to the patient for biopsy and therapy Modulation transfer function Wire phantom (10 cm diameter) MTF plot ( 30 µm Ni74/Cr20 wire) MTF 10% : 5.6 lp/mm Kalender WA, Althoff F. Patent application 2010 C = 500, W = 4000 Seite 4 4
ACR phantom ACR phantom: fibers & masses Fibers (nylon fiber) 1. 1.56 mm 2. 1.12 mm 3. 0.89 mm 4. 0.75 mm 5. 0.54 mm 6. 0.40 mm Specks (AI 2 O 3 speck) 7. 0.54 mm 8. 0.40 mm 9. 0.32 mm 10. 0.24 mm 11. 0.16 mm Masses (thickness) 12. 2.00 mm 13. 1.00 mm 14. 0.75 mm 15. 0.50 mm 16. 0.25 mm 500 µm 750 µm 750 µm Fibers 400 µm 500 µm 250 µm Masses Even for the ideal ACR phantom situation with no structures superimposed mammography misses small structures shown by breast CT! http://www.opraxmedical.com/accessories/phantoms//cirs/accreditation/ ACR phantom: microcalcifications Even for the ideal ACR phantom situation with no structures superimposed mammography misses small structures shown by breast CT! µcalcs 240 µm C = 1900, W = 1000 C = 500, W = 4000 240 µm 160 µm Expectations for high-res. breast CT Good detectability of - microcalcifications of 100-150 µm diameter, - soft tissue lesions of 2 mm diameter, at an AGD of 2 to 4 mgy! Dynamic contrast-enhanced t scanning for improved analysis of differential uptake. A one-stop shopping modality for complete diagnostic workup on one device. First system tests before end of 2012, clinical tests starting in mid 2013. Acknowledgement of support European Union FP7 program Dedicated CT of the female breast. 1/2008-6/2010; PI: W.A. Kalender German Science Foundation Multimodal Imaging for Preclinical Research, 10/2009-9/2012; PI: W.A. Kalender German Ministery of Education and Science 10/2010-4/2015; PI: W.A. Kalender Scientific Adviser: John Boone, UC Davis Special thanks go to the R&D teams at the IMP & CT Imaging GmbH in Erlangen Thank you for your attention! willi.kalender@imp.uni-erlangen.deerlangen.de www.imp.uni-erlangen.de Seite 5 5