Toll ring around Oslo: How car owners help paying for improved mobility, and better environment too



Similar documents
Urban Tolling in Norway

Road Tolling in Norway a brief introduction

Norwegian road tolling: scope, limits and perspectives for the future

Transport planning in the Stockholm Region

A Users Guide to Tolling

Transport Demand Management

Concept for Railway and Transportation in Southern Norway. High Speed Line Oslo Hadeland Gjøvik Moelv. with High Speed Line Oslo Trondheim / Ålesund

INVITATION FIA EUROPEAN TRAFFIC EDUCATION CONTEST (ETEC) 5 7 SEPTEMBER 2014 LILLESTRØM, NORWAY

The Oslo Pass - Oslo (Norway)

Financing Public Transport

Market Efficient Public Transport? An analysis of developments in Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim, Kristiansand, and Tromsø

OSLO, a new step for the city - port relationship

Submission from Living Streets Aotearoa Wellington City Public Transport Spine Study

1st CONFERENCE IN ETHNOMUSICOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY OF MUSIC Methods, approaches and perspectives for the study of music within culture

Oslo T-bane, Norway

Background to the Norwegian Ministry of Transport and Communications support for the measures

ExpressLanes CAG Summit. March 2, 2010

Parking Business Plan

Tendering of passenger rail traffic in Norway

ALL-ELECTRIC CAR SUBSCRIPTION

(25) CONCEPT STUDY OSLO HUB A MEGA PROJECT Nina Tveiten Norwegian National Rail Administration

Key figures Norwegian Public Roads Administration

Service Quality Performance Report 2013

Supplier conference. Passenger counting solutions. Oslo, 14th January 2016

ONLINE DATABASE ON GOOD PRACTICES.

AutoPASS Requirement Specification

PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SMALL TOWNS AN AREA WITH GREAT POTENTIAL

Bjørn Kjos (CEO) Oslo, 27. April 2006 Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA

The delicate water balance of Bryggen

How to implement cycling solutions in a post-communist street system (and mentality) Marcin Hyła, VeloForum, 16 Oct.

NOTTINGHAM. Workplace Parking Levy

How Singapore and London Have Used Congestion Pricing to Reduce Congestion and Improve the Environment

Incremental Changes and Disruptive Impacts in Tolling. By Philip Miller, P.E., AECOM

National road user charging standards in Norway

GTA Cordon Count Program

Automatic ticketing at ferry crossings

Carpooling in Bergen, Norway with an app called Carma. By: Kristian Amlie, Carpool enthusiast 26th of March MMØresund

Advantages and Disadvantages of One Way Streets October 30, 2007

SUMMARY OF HYDROGEN STRATEGY AKERSHUS AND OSLO

STEIGEN AIR RESIDENCIES FOR VISITING ARTIST IN THE LAND OF THE MIDNIGHT SUN AND AURORA POLARIS

Bjørvika Utvikling Bjørvika Infrastruktur

Public Transport in the Oslo Region

Bluetooth - Evaluation and results

Electronic Toll Collection

Comparing Arterial Speeds from Big-Data Sources in Southeast Florida (Bluetooth, HERE and INRIX)

Major Improvement Schemes in Basingstoke

Growth of Addis Ababa

Informal meeting of EU ministers for Transport Luxembourg, October 7th, Declaration on Cycling as a climate friendly Transport Mode

Information. Local Government in Norway

The Follo Line Project

Wages and Working Conditions in Norway

RandstadRail: Increase in Public Transport Quality by Controlling Operations

"Description of the urban and architectural development conceptual design of the historical city centre of Gorzow Wlkp. R3DC4T

HLJ Transport policy in Nordic urban regions - POLISE

Why build the Silvertown Tunnel?

Urban Mobility India 2011 The IBM Smarter Cities Solutions: Opportunities for Intelligent Transportation

Measuring the University s Performance: Data for Decisions Practical Information

Living and working in Norway

The Port of Oslo. A cleaner way to Norway s capital. 3,350 mobile phones arrive in Oslo by sea every day. photo: bård ek

Volkswagen Telematics by OnStar

Norwegian electromobility policy for 2020

Cash Flow Exclusive / September 2015

The New Mobility: Using Big Data to Get Around Simply and Sustainably

The Norwegian High Speed Rail Assessment

INTEGRATION AND REGULATORY STRUCTURES IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT CASE STUDY BRUSSELS CAPITAL REGION

Penalty Fares information

NEXTix UNIFIED CITY-WIDE TELECOMMUNICATIONS

The challenge: tranform the Urban Mobility model to make Milano a more Livable city. Agency for Mobility, Environment, Territory - City of Milan

Hydrogen as strategy in Climate Action Plan for Hordaland

City of Vantaa New Plans and Projects

INTEGRATION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT AND NMT PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION IN AN EAST AFRICAN CONTEXT

May The Right Direction. The Mayor s Strategy for improving transport safety, security and reliability in London Executive Summary

Telemarketing Selling Script for Mobile Websites

Mobility Management plan of The CITY OF BELGRADE

CHAPTER 3 AVI TRAVEL TIME DATA COLLECTION

Ne w J e r s e y Tr a f f i c Co n g e s t i o n :

and 7 Queensland Transport, Moving People Connecting Communities: A Passenger Transport Strategy for Queensland , 2006

Keywords: Passenger Costs, Railway Maintenance Planning, Railway Closure Time Evaluation

2012 Saskatoon Transit Services Annual Report

Transcription:

Toll ring around Oslo: How car owners help paying for improved mobility, and better environment too Kristian Wærsted City Hall Chief Engineer (NPRA)

Road tolling in Norway Trondheim Bergen (1986) (1991) Oslo (1990) 4,4 million inhabitants 2,3 million cars 91 545 km public roads 70 years of road tolling experience to finance expensive infrastructure (mountains / fjords) More than 100 road toll projects built Toll collection normally lasts for 15 years 48 toll schemes in operation Urban toll systems in the last 20 years Point payment only (open systems) Toll revenues contribute approx. one third of the investments in national roads

Urban toll rings in Norway May 2005 City Plazas Start End Pop. in ar. In op.* AADT ** EFC % Tags NOK /Pbe Bergen 1 8 1986 2004 300 16/5 60 - - 5-10 Oslo 19 1990 2007 900 24/7 250 82 450 10-20 Trondheim 12 17 23 1991 1998 2003 2005 250 11/5 12/5 100 95 150 10 15 Kristiansand 5 1997 2007 100 24/7 55 84 30 10 N. Jæren (Stavanger) 21 2001 2011 230 12/5 150 91 110 5/10 Namsos 3 2003 2017 15 12/5 7 89 10 13 Tønsberg 6 2004 2019 50 24/7 50 86 35 15 Bergen 2 8 2004 2014 300 24/6 100 87 105 15 figures in thousands * Hours a day and days a week ** During hours of operation

The background for the Oslo Package planned in the eighties was: Unsatisfactory traffic flow with significant delays for all traffic Oslo had a special need to build a new main road trough the city center (with a tunnel in front of the City Hall) Public grants for transportation in the Oslo region had for some time been relatively low The local politicians had given up hope for more grants from the State, and had begun to discuss alternative ways to finance the new tunnel in front of the City Hall The car traffic also caused environmental problems

The Oslo Package 1 Motivation: To build 50 predefined projects in ten years instead of 35 with state funds only Joint venture between Oslo (60%) and the neighbour county of Akershus (40%) Users contribute with 55% of funding The toll ring (white lines) covers all roads in three corridors 50% of Oslos population live outside the toll ring Oslo Akershus AADT in the payment direction is approx. 250 000 Approx. 1 bill. NOK per year income, approx. 10% operation cost

Oslo Toll Ring layout E18 E18 E6 E6 For economical and political reasons the best place for a toll ring was about halfway between the city border and the city centre. Only four minor roads had to be closed in order to make the ring watertight

Oslo toll plaza no. 5 on a western arterial The subscription lane ( abonnement ) has a high capacity, approx. 1600 veh/hour Approx. 300 veh/hour capacity in coin machine and attended ( manuell ) lanes No expansion of total road area was necessary

Toll plaza no.11 on E6 north is the largest in Oslo. It has 3+1 AutoPASS lanes

Toll plaza no.14 on E6 south You will arrive here when approaching Oslo from Stockholm or Copenhagen

Toll fees in the Oslo Toll Ring Heavy vehicles have an allowed total weight higher than 3500 kg Pre-paid trip subscribers get up to 43% discount Monthly, semi-annual or annual subscriptions of unlimited use give even higher discounts Public transport, MC, ELcars, ambulances, and handicapped persons do not pay

Oslo Toll Ring Experiences Overall reduction in traffic: 3-5% Growth in public transport: 6-9% Situation back to normal after only a few months Off peak drivers most sensitive to pricing No capacity problems in the plazas Higher workload and more comprehensive computer systems in the back office system than expected Users do not always behave as expected

Community importance of urban road tunnels Reduced delay due to removal of bottlenecks Road space above ground can be made available for other uses Removed barrier effects from the surface street network Reduced noise from above ground traffic Less pollution (high chimneys, filtering) Improved traffic safety

Opinion polls unveil a negative attitude to the toll ring in Oslo The increase in negative attitude in 2001 is due to: 1. introduction of Oslo Package no.2 : NOK 2,- extra per passing allocated for public transport only 2. a fear that the toll ring will not be removed in 2007 which was the original decision The toll ring opened 1. Febr. 1990

How was it possible to implement a toll scheme in Oslo that 70% were against? Bergen initiated a successful toll ring in 1986 Road traffic conditions were choking The major political parties agreed The toll is to finance road infrastructure Limited collection period, only 15 years Additional extra funding from the State is part of the plan Low fees Those opposed to car driving appreciate that the motorists have to pay 20% of toll income is earmarked public transport User friendly fee structure (?) (multi-trip subscriptions with discount and season tickets)

The City Hall Street before opening The Castle Tunnel

The City Hall Street after opening The Castle Tunnel

The City Hall Square before opening The Castle Tunnel Photo: Mari Kollandsrud, Riksantikvaren

The City Hall Square after opening The Castle Tunnel Photo: Mari Kollandsrud, Riksantikvaren The AADT was reduced from 90 000 to 0 vehicles New tram line opened A new plaza for walking, festivals and exhibitions

The traffic goes here (down to -45 m)

What does the future hold? The Oslo Toll Ring was supposed to expire in 2007 will it: 1. be removed? 2. be prolonged (like the toll ring in Bergen)? 3. get a time differentiated fee system to manage traffic during peak hours (congestion charging)? 4. be replaced by an other type of congestion charging scheme?

The new Bjørvika Tunnel will make room for a new district of Oslo between the new opera house (A) (under construction) and the medieval part of Oslo (B). Shall the State or the City pay for it? ): The road users are once more the solution A The Castle Tunnel is ending here today B

Congestion Charging light favouring public transport Fees (pbe): NOK 3,- (1 unit) in both directions NOK 6,- (2 units) in both directions + Double fees in peak periods + Free periods late evening and night + Double fees for heavy vehicles. City borders The toll ring

A bidirectional multicordon road pricing system in Oslo will demand fully automatic free flow toll plazas similar to those in Tønsberg and Bergen Tønsberg Bergen

Fully automatic toll plazas in Bergen

AutoPASS A technical specification for electronic tags (EFC) owned by NPRA Independent of industry and open to all from 1999 In full compliance with CEN and ETSI standards for DSRC Interoperable from 2004 and presently used in 24 out of 48 toll projects! One million tags in use!

The AutoPASS lanes lies to the right in a manned freeway toll plaza New traffic signs and symbols

Do we need road pricing in Norway? There are congestion in Norwegian cities, but only in Oslo, Bergen and maybe Trondheim Congestion is confined to two hours in the morning and evening rush hours The level of congestion is small in an international context. Average delay on main corridors into Oslo in the morning is 20 minutes with 35 minutes for the worst, western corridor Professionally desirable and politically unpopular The crucial question is whether congestion is big enough to get political accept for road pricing. Presently the cure seems worse than the pain!

Arguments for and against road pricing For road pricing Will reduce congestion and improve the environment Remaining traffic will gain in travel time savings Income may also be used to improve public transport Against road pricing Equity problems Motorists pay high taxes already Privacy issues Downtown businesses will suffer Cost of implementation and operation

A political dilemma. Solely my own opinion!!! Conservatives trusts market mechanisms except for traffic regulation - and opposes road pricing! Socialists distrusts market mechanism except for traffic regulation and approves road pricing, but dare not vote for it? Nobody dare to focus on road pricing before an election In Norway we have elections every second year!!

Thank you for your attention! For more information: Please contact Mr. Kristian Wærsted Railway station Norwegian Public Roads Administration E-mail: kristian.warsted @vegvesen.no Phone: +47 22 07 37 35 Mobile: +47 915 195 89 City Hall Fax: +47 22 07 33 08 Castle Tunnel