EUROCODE 1 Actions on Building Structures



Similar documents
Eurocode 1: Actions on structures Part 1-1: General actions - Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings

EN DK NA:2007

NATIONAL ANNEX TO STANDARD SFS-EN 1990 EUROCODE BASIS OF STRUCTURAL DESIGN

Eurocodes Background and Applications

DS/EN 1990 DK NA:2013

Eurocodes, history and present

EN :2005. Wind actions

EUROCODES. Background and Applications. EN 1991 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures. Dissemination of information for training workshop

EN Eurocode 1 Accidental Actions. Ton Vrouwenvelder TNO Bouw / TU Delft. EUROCODES Background and Applications

BFS 2013:10 EKS 9. Section A General provisions. Scope of validity. Consolidated Version as last amended by BFS 2013:10 EKS 9

DOCUMENT CAESAS/1: SCHEME DESCRIPTION AND BENEFITS

N 1069 CEN-TC250-WG7 N0001 EG EN1990

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures

Institution of Civil Engineers Republic of Ireland Section

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF WIND ON BUILDING STRUCTURES

How To Understand And Understand Eurocode

Ministry of the Environment Decree on applying Eurocode standards in building construction

DESIGN CRITERIA. Determination of earthquake demand. Building importance level. Component categories SEISMICALLY RESILIENT NON-STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

TITLE 1. DESIGN BASES CHAPTER II. GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Concrete Design to Eurocode 2

Fire 2This Technical Bulletin has been commissioned by the UK SIP Association in

INTRODUCTION TO LIMIT STATES

Loads and Seismic Design National Building Code Wind and Snow Importance Factors

Structural fire design Eurocode Timber structures

WORLD S TALLEST TIMBER BUILDING, BERGEN

Introduction. Eurocodes. Specification. Cost

Scope of EN Clarification Document

MacroFlo Opening Types User Guide <Virtual Environment> 6.0

DS/EN DK NA:2014

Design rules for bridges in Eurocode 3

European Technical Approval ETA 13/0526

Use of Structural Eurocodes EN 1995 (Design of Timber Structures) Companion Document to EN

Prof. Dr. Zahid A. Siddiqi, UET, Lahore WIND LOAD

DESIGN OF SLABS. Department of Structures and Materials Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

A NEW DESIGN METHOD FOR INDUSTRIAL PORTAL FRAMES IN FIRE

Timber frame structures platform frame construction (part 1)

`Fall Protection Guidelines in Construction

determining wind and snow loads for solar panels America s Authority on Solar

Timber Frame Construction

Conservatory Roof Structural Information Guide

Understanding BS EN 771-3: Aggregate concrete masonry units

Guide to the use of EN Wind Actions

Mandate M/111 CIRCULATION FIXTURES

CHAPTER 6 WIND LOADS

Development of Seismic-induced Fire Risk Assessment Method for a Building

Load and Resistance Factor Geotechnical Design Code Development in Canada. by Gordon A. Fenton Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

ARCHITECTURE. Asst. Prof. Meltem VATAN KAPTAN

The BASA Guide to the ISO Classification of Sealants for Building Construction

EXPLOSIVE ATMOSPHERES - CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS AREAS (ZONING) AND SELECTION OF EQUIPMENT

N250, N600, EC0, EC1, EC2, EC5, EC7, EC9 & the writing of EC10

Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures

Structural Analysis. EUROCODE 2 Background and Applications

Companion Document. EN : Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings

Definition of classes and info material to manufacturers related to EN ISO 9806

Standard the the Raising

Analysis of the Response Under Live Loads of Two New Cable Stayed Bridges Built in Mexico

Computer Program for the Analysis of Loads On Buildings. Using the ASCE 7-93 Standard. Stephen E. Browning. Master of Engineering.

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE - FACULTY OF LAND RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING -BUCHAREST

Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Liquid Storage Tanks

First 14-storey wood building in the world at Bergen in Norway Premier bâtiment en bois à 14 niveaux au monde à Bergen en Norvège

DS/EN DK NA:2014

MANUFACTURED HOUSING USED AS DWELLINGS

Chapter 2 Basis of design and materials

Fire safety in timber buildings

FOUNDATION TECHNICAL CATEGORY 3 (TC3) AUGUST 2012

DOSSIER EN m CONCISE DESCRIPTION OF THE STANDARD. 2nd edition, june 2012

European Technical Assessment ETA-10/0153 of 10/06/2015

Put us to the test. Construction testing and building investigations services from BRE.

Fall protection systems and practices Duty to have fall protection Protection at or above 6' level.

Reinforced Concrete Design


Aluminium systems profile selection

LIVE LOADS. Chapter 4

FLOORS REINFORCEMENT Shear Stud Connector for steel- concrete composite structures cold applied by pins

CERTIFICATE NAME OF PRODUCT MANUFACTURER PRODUCT DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATION PROCEDURE. No VTT C Date of issue , Updated July 1, 2011

D5.1 Report on the needs to achieve improved fire protection as regards the implementation and development of the EN Eurocodes

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

Fluid Mechanics: Static s Kinematics Dynamics Fluid

SEISMIC APPROACH DESIGN COMPARISON BETWEEN

Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures

EUROPASS DIPLOMA SUPPLEMENT

Five reasons buildings fail in an earthquake and how to avoid them

European technical approval

Miss S. S. Nibhorkar 1 1 M. E (Structure) Scholar,

A study of the nature of fire risks in tall buildings

w o r k o G f E A x - p r S i t n c e Elegance and Strength BBR HiAm CONA Strand Stay Cable Damping Systems

Technical Manual - Section 1 Introduction to Lytag lightweight aggregate

Water hammering in fire fighting installation

EFA PSBP. Natural Ventilation Strategy. Introduction. 1.1 Relevant legislation The Building Regulations 2010

Structural Audit of Buildings

DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED BARRIER CABLE SYSTEMS

pren Eurocode 5 Design of timber structures Part 1-2: General rules Structural fire design Final Draft - October 2001 Stage 34 Clean version

Design guide. Part 1: Structural Design

WORKING DOCUMENT FOR SCC CONSULTATION CONSTRUCT09/874 EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

1997 Uniform Administrative Code Amendment for Earthen Material and Straw Bale Structures Tucson/Pima County, Arizona

PDCA Driven-Pile Terms and Definitions

Civil Engineering and Architecture (CEA) Detailed Outline

Machinery Safety. Presented by Paul Laidler. TÜV SÜD Product Service

Transcription:

EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 1 EUROCODE 1 Actions on Building Structures Paolo Formichi CEN/TC250/SC1 University of Pisa (Italy)

EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 2 Scope of the presentation: illustrate Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures, its architecture and general principles with reference to buildings background and pre-normative studies illustrate the main concepts and design philosophy for some parts of Eurocode 1.

The Eurocode programme EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 3 EN Number EN 1990 EN 1991 EN 1992 EN 1993 EN 1994 EN 1995 EN 1996 EN 1997 EN 1998 EN 1999 The Structural Eurocodes (58 parts) Eurocode: Basis of structural design Eurocode 1: Actions on structures Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures N of Parts 1 10 4 20 3 3 5 3 6 3

The Eurocode 1 package EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 4 EN 1991 part EN 1991-1-1 EN 1991-1-2 EN 1991-1-3 EN 1991-1-4 EN 1991-1-5 EN 1991-1-6 EN 1991-1-7 EN 1991-2 EN 1991-3 EN 1991-4 Densities, self weight, imposed loads for buildings Actions on structures exposed to fire Snow loads Wind actions Thermal actions Actions during execution Accidental actions Traffic loads on bridges Actions induced by cranes and machinery Silos and tanks Published 2002 2002 2003 2005 2003 2005 2006 2003 2006 2006

Format of the Eurocode 1 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 5 Each part of Eurocode 1 (except part 1-2 on Actions on structures exposed to fire) is made up by the following sections: - Foreword - Section 1: General - Section 2: Classification of Actions - Section 3: Design Situations - Section 4.: Representation of actions (specific rules for the definition of each action s values) - Annexes (Normative or Informative)

Format of the Eurocode 1 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 6 The Foreword is common for all EC1 parts and contains information on: - The Structural Eurocode programme; - The Status and Field of Application of Eurocodes; - National Standards implementing Eurocodes; - Links between Eurocodes and harmonised technical specifications (ENs and ETAs) for products; - Additional information specific for each part; - National Annex for each part.

Format of the Eurocode 1 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 7 National Standards implementing Eurocodes National Annex European Commission recognises the responsibility of regulatory Authorities in each EU member state in the determination of values related to safety matters at national level through a National Annex. The National Annex may only contain information on those parameters, which are left open in the Eurocode for national choice, known as Nationally Determined Parameters (NDPs).

Format of the Eurocode 1 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 8 Nationally Determined Parameters (NDPs) Differences in geographical or climatic conditions (e.g. wind or snow maps) or in ways of life, as well as different levels of protection that may prevail at national, regional or local level, can be taken into account through NDPs specifying: values and/or classes where alternatives are given in the Eurocode; values to be used where a symbol only is given in the Eurocode; country specific data (geographical, climatic, etc.) e.g. snow map; procedure to be used where alternative procedures are given in the Eurocode. The National Annex may also contain: decisions on the application of informative annexes; references to non contradictory complementary information to assist the user to apply the Eurocode.

Format of the Eurocode 1 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 9 Nationally Determined Parameters (NDPs) 1500 NDPs in the Eurocode suite 355 NDPs in EN 1991 EN 1998 9% EN 1997 5% EN 1996 4% EN 1995 2% EN 1994 4% EN 1993 28% EN 1999 6% EN 1990 3% EN 1991 24% EN 1992 15%

Format of the Eurocode 1 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 10 Section 1 - General 1.1 Scope 1.2 Normative references 1.3 Distinction between Principles and Application Rules 1.4 Terms and definitions The Principles comprise: - general statements and definitions for which there is no alternative, as well as - requirements and analytical models for which no alternative is permitted unless specifically stated. The Application Rules are generally recognised rules which comply with the Principles and satisfy their requirements.

Format of the Eurocode 1 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 11 Section 2 Classification of Actions Variation in time Origin Spatial variation Nature and/or Structural response Permanent (G) Variable (Q) Accidental (A) Direct (e.g. forces) Indirect (e.g. temperature) Fixed (e.g. self weight) Free (e.g. predeformation) Static Dynamic

Format of the Eurocode 1 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 12 Section 3 Design situations EN 1990 3.2(1)P The relevant design situations shall be selected taking into account the circumstances under which the structure is required to fulfil its function. EN 1990 3.2(2)P Design situations shall be classified as follows: persistent design situations, which refer to the conditions of normal use; transient design situations, which refer to temporary conditions applicable to the structure, e.g. during execution or repair; accidental design situations, which refer to exceptional conditions applicable to the structure or to its exposure, e.g. to fire, explosion, impact or the consequences of localised failure; seismic design situations, which refer to conditions applicable to the structure when subjected to seismic events.

Format of the Eurocode 1 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 13 ULS Design situations (EN1990) Persistent/transient design situations Accidental design situations Seismic design situations

EN 1991-1-1 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 14 EN 1991-1-1 Densities, self weight, imposed loads for buildings EN 1991-1-1 gives design guidance and actions for the structural design of buildings and civil engineering works including some geotechnical aspects for the following subjects: - Densities of construction materials and stored materials; - Self-weight of construction works; - Imposed loads for buildings. Background documents: - ISO 9194 Basis for Design of Structures Actions due to Self-Weight of Structures, non Structural Elements and Stored materials Density; - CIB Report 115/89 Int. Council for research and innovation in building and construction Actions on Structures, Self-Weight Loads; - CIB Report 116/89 Int. Council for research and innovation in building and construction Actions on Structures, Live Loads in Buildings; - National Standards of CEN member states;

EN 1991-1-1 Imposed Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 15 Imposed loads (characteristic values) Categories of occupancy (Example) Category Specific Use q k [kn/m 2 ] Q k [kn] q k [kn/m] A Areas for domestic and residential activities (floors) 1.5 to 2.0 2.0 to 3.0 0.2 to 1.0 (0.5) B Office areas 2.0 to 3.0 1.5 to 4.5 C Areas where people may congregate: C1: Areas with tables (e.g. restaurants, cafés ) 2.0 to 3.0 3.0 to 4.0 0.2 to 1.0 (0.5) C2: Areas with fixed seats (e.g. areas in churches, theatres or cinemas ) 3.0 to 4.0 2.5 to 7.0 (4.0) C3: Areas without obstacles for moving people (e.g. museums, exhibition rooms ) 3.0 to 5.0 4.0 to 7.0 0.8 to 1.0 C4: Areas with possible physical activities (e.g. dance halls, gymnastic rooms ) 4.5 to 5.0 3.5 to 7.0 C5: Areas susceptible to large crowds (e.g. concert halls ) 5.0 to 7.5 3.5 to 4.5 3.0 to 5.0 D Shopping areas: D1: Areas in general retail shops 4.0 to 5.0 3.5 to 7.0 (4.0) 0.8 to 1.0 D2: Areas in department stores 4.0 to 5.0 3.5 to 7.0

EN 1991-1-1 Imposed Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 16 6.2.1 Floors Beams and Roofs (1)P For the design of a floor structure within one storey or a roof, the imposed load shall be taken into account as a free action applied at the most unfavourable part of the influence area of the action effects considered. (2) Where the loads on other storeys are relevant, they may be assumed to be distributed uniformly (fixed actions).

EN 1991-1-1 Imposed Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 17 Specific rules for the reduction of the imposed load on Beams ψ 0 is the combination factor according to EN 1990, may be taken as: 0,7 for residential, social and commercial areas 1,0 for storage and industrial areas A 0 = 10,0 m 2 A is the influence area 1.20 α A 1.00 ψ 0 = 0.7 ψ 0 = 1.0 0.80 Influence area 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0 50 100 150 200 A [m 2 ]

EN 1991-1-1 Imposed Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 18 Specific rules for the reduction of the imposed load on Columns in residential areas, offices, areas with congregation of people and shopping centres. The total imposed load from several storeys may be multiplied by a reduction factor α n n is the number of storeys (> 2) above the loaded structural elements from the same category. ψ 0 is in accordance with EN 1990 (may be taken equal to 0,7). q k,m q k,i q k,i q k,i q k,i q k,i 5 storeys above the column α n 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 α n n = 5 = 0.82 0 10 20 30 40 n 50

EN 1991-1-3 Snow Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 19 EN 1991-1-3 Snow Loads EN 1991-1-3 provides guidance for the determination of the snow load to be used for the structural design of buildings and civil engineering works for sites at altitudes under 1500m. In the case of altitudes above 1500m advice may be found in the appropriate National Annex. Snow loads in general are classified as variable/accidental, direct, fixed, static actions.

EN 1991-1-3 Snow Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 20 Snow Loads as Accidental Actions Exceptional snow load on the ground Exceptional snow drifts 0.79 1.30 Gumbel probability paper: Pistoia (IT) k = s m /s k = 1,65

EN 1991-1-3 Snow Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 21 Background documents: EN 1991-1-3 is mainly based on: - ISO 4355 Bases for design of structures Determination of snow loads on roofs - the results of a research work, carried out between 1996 and 1999, under a contract specific to this Eurocode, to DGIII/D3 of the European Commission. In the research work (1996-1999) they were identified four main tasks: study of the European ground snow load map investigation and treatment of exceptional snow loads study of conversion factors from ground to roof loads definition of ULS and SLS combination factors for snow loads. http://www2.ing.unipi.it/dis/snowloads/

Contents of EN 1991-1-3 Snow Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 22 Foreword Section 1: General Section 2: Classification of actions Section 3: Design situations Section 4: Snow load on the ground Section 5: Snow load on roofs Section 6: Local effects ANNEX A: Design situations and load arrangements to be used for different locations ANNEX B: Snow load shape coefficients for exceptional snow drifts ANNEX C: European Ground Snow Load Maps ANNEX D: Adjustment of the ground snow load according to return period ANNEX E: Bulk weight density of snow

EN 1991-1-3 Snow Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 23 The snow load on the roof is derived from the snow load on the ground (s k ), multiplying by appropriate conversion factors (shape, thermal and exposure coefficients). s = μ i C e C t s k s k is intended as the upper value of a random variable, for which a given statistical distribution function applies, with the annual probability of exceedence set to 0,02 (i.e. a probability of not being exceeded on the unfavourable side during a reference period of 50 years). The characteristic ground snow loads (s k ) are given by the National Annex for each CEN country.

EN 1991-1-3 Snow Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 24 Ground Snow Load Database Data from 2600 weather stations from 18 countries Elaborations with common statistical procedures Ground Snow Load Map 10 Climatic Regions With homogeneous climatic features

EN 1991-1-3 Snow Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 25 Alpine Region Snow load at sea level (France, Italy, Austria, Germany and Switzerland) s k = ( 0,642Z + 0,009) 1 + z = Zone number given on the map A = site altitude above Sea Level [m] A 728 2

EN 1991-1-3 Snow Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 26 Snow Loads on roofs In absence of wind, or with very low wind velocities (<2 m/s) snow deposits on the roof in a balanced way and generally a uniform cover is formed. s = μ i C e C t s k The snow the snow layers on a roof can have many different shapes depending on roof s characteristics (shape, thermal properties, roughness, exposure, local climate, surrounding terrain, etc.) UNDRIFTED LOAD ARRANGEMENT DRIFTED LOAD ARRANGEMENT For situations where the wind velocity increases above 4 5 m/s snow particles can be picked up from the snow cover and re-deposited on the lee sides, or on lower roofs in the lee side, or behind obstructions on the roof. wind

EN 1991-1-3 Snow Loads EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 27 Snow Loads on Roofs Values for shape coefficients μ i given in EN 1991-1-3 are calibrated on a wide experimental campaign, both in situ and in wind tunnel. s = μ i C e C t s k 1,49 1,92 Average = 1,67 30 Multi-span drifted case

EN 1991-1-4 Wind Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 28 EN 1991-1-4 Wind Actions EN 1991-1-4 gives guidance on the determination of natural wind actions for the structural design of building and civil engineering works for each of the loaded areas under consideration. This includes the whole structure or parts of the structure or elements attached to the structure, e.g. components, cladding units and their fixings, safety and noise barriers. Structure Buildings Bridges Field of application of EN 1991-1-4 Maximum height 200 m Maximum span 200 m Wind Actions are classified as variable, fixed, direct actions. According to the structural response: - quasi-static response (the majority of building structures) - dynamic aeroelastic response (lightweight structures e.g. steel chimneys)

Contents of EN 1991-1-4 Wind Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 29 Foreword Section 1: General Section 2: Design situations Section 3: Modelling of wind actions Section 4: Wind velocity and velocity pressure Section 5: Wind actions Section 6: Structural factor C s C d Section 7: Pressure and force coefficients Section 8: Wind actions on bridges ANNEX A: Terrain effects ANNEX B: Procedure 1 for determining the structural factor C s C d ANNEX C: Procedure 2 for determining the structural factor C s C d ANNEX D: C s C d for different types of structures ANNEX E: Vortex shedding and aeroelastic instability ANNEX F: Dynamic characteristics of structures

EN 1991-1-4 Wind Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 30 Wind pressures The characteristic peak velocity pressure q p is the main parameter for the determination of the wind actions on structures and accounts for the mean wind and the turbulence component. EN 1991-1-4 indicates q p as a function of: Wind climate, through the basic wind velocity v b at a given site; Local factors, such as terrain roughness [c r (z)], orography [c 0 (z)]; Height above the terrain (z).

EN 1991-1-4 Wind Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 31 Wind actions on structures may be calculated as: Wind Pressures on both external and internal surfaces; Wind Forces, directly or as the summation of wind pressures acting over reference surfaces q p (z) peak velocity pressure for the given location (site basic velocity, terrain roughness, orography etc.), function of the reference height z c p c f c s c d A ref pressure coefficient (internal or external) depending on the location of the reference area in the structure force coefficient, depending on the size ratios of the structural element structural factor takes into account the effect on wind actions from the non simultaneous occurrence of peak wind pressures on the surface (c s ) together with the effect of the vibrations of the structure due to turbulence (c d ) reference area: portion of the structure or structural element.

EN 1991-1-4 Wind Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 32 Example of pressure coefficients Duoptch Roof Z e = h At θ=0 the External Pressure changes rapidly between positive and negative values on the windward face around a pitch angle of θ=-5 to 45, so both positive and negative values are given.

EN 1991-1-4 Wind Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 33 Structural factor C s C d (example of calculation - Annex D) Structural factor takes into account the effect on wind actions from the non simultaneous occurrence of peak wind pressures on the surface (C s ) together with the effect of the vibrations of the structure due to turbulence (C d ).

EN 1991-1-7 Accidental Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 34 EN 1991-1-7 Accidental Actions EN 1991-1-7 provides strategies and rules for safeguarding buildings and other civil engineering works against identifiable and unidentifiable accidental actions. They are defined: strategies based on identified accidental actions (e.g. an impact from a delivery lorry in a supermarket), strategies based on limiting the extent of localised failure (e.g. consequence of a natural gas explosion).

Contents of EN 1991-1-7 Accidental Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 35 Foreword Section 1: Section 2: Section 3: Section 4: Section 5: General Classification of actions Design situations Impact Internal Explosions ANNEX A: (Informative) Design for consequences of localised failure in buildings from an unspecified cause ANNEX B: (Informative) Information on risk assessment ANNEX C: (Informative) Dynamic design for impact ANNEX D: (Informative) Internal Explosions

EN 1991-1-7 Accidental Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 36 Strategies for Accidental Design Situations

EN 1991-1-7 Accidental Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 37 Example of identifiable accidental actions - Impact from vehicles Hard impact may be determined by dynamic analysis or modelled by equivalent static design collision forces.

EN 1991-1-7 Accidental Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 38 Example of identifiable accidental actions - Explosions Gas explosions account for the majority of accidental explosions in buildings. Gas is widely used and, excluding vehicular impact, the incidence of occurrence of gas explosions in buildings is an order of magnitude higher than other accidental loads causing medium or severe damage that may lead to progressive or disproportionate collapse. The disproportionate collapse at Ronan Point East London May 16 th 1968

EN 1991-1-7 Accidental Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 39 Key elements of a structure should be designed to withstand the effects of an internal natural gas explosion, using a nominal equivalent static pressure is given by: p d = 3 + p v or p d = 3 + 0,5 p v +0,04/(A v /V) 2 whichever is the greater, where: - p v is the uniformly distributed static pressure in kn/m 2 at which venting components will fail; - A v is the area of venting components; - V is the volume of room. The explosive pressure acts effectively simultaneously on all of the bounding surfaces of the room.

EN 1991-1-7 Accidental Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 40 Limiting the extent of localised failure Designing a building such that neither the whole building nor a significant part of it will collapse if localised failure were sustained, is an acceptable strategy. Adopting this strategy should provide a building with sufficient robustness to survive a reasonable range of undefined accidental actions depending on their possible consequences. Example of design procedures: provide adequate horizontal ties around and internally to each floor (minimum axial forces to design ties are given) provide vertical ties (columns should be designed to resist tensile loads explosions) ensure that upon the notional removal of a supporting column, beam or wall, the damage does not exceed 15% of the floor area.

EN 1991-1-7 Accidental Actions EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 41 Safety differentiation Collapse may cause particularly large consequences in terms of injury to humans, damage to the environment or economic losses for the society. In practice this means that Eurocode 1, Part 1.7 accepts the principle of safety differentiation. Consequence Class CC3 CC2 CC1 Description High consequence for loss of human life, or economic, social or environmental consequences very great Medium consequence for loss of human life, economic, social or environmental consequences considerable Low consequence for loss of human life, and economic, social or environmental consequences small or negligible Examples of buildings and civil engineering works Grandstands, public buildings where consequences of failure are high (e.g. a concert hall) Residential and office buildings, public buildings where consequences of failure are medium (e.g. an office building) Agricultural buildings where people do not normally enter (e.g. storage buildings), greenhouses Definition of consequence classes Annex B EN1990 Recommended strategies to limit the consequences of localised failure in buildings from an unspecified cause - risk analysis - horizontal ties, together with vertical ties, in all supporting columns and walls should be provided, or alternatively - the building should be checked to ensure that upon the notional removal of each supporting column and each beam supporting a column, or any nominal section of load-bearing wall (one at a time in each storey of the building) the building remains stable and that any local damage does not exceed a certain limit. Provision of effective horizontal ties, or effective anchorage of suspended floors to walls should be provided. No further specific consideration is necessary with regard to accidental actions from unidentified causes.

EN 1991 EU-Russia cooperation on standardisation for construction Moscow, 9-10 October 2008 42 http://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ Thank you for your attention.