Fired Heater Design and Simulation



Similar documents
FURNACE (ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINE)

5.2. Vaporizers - Types and Usage

DIRECT-FIRED HEATERS: OPERATOR TRAINING. Intensive 2-Day Training Course for Facility Operators

Energy Efficient Process Heating: Insulation and Thermal Mass

FIRED HEATER OPTIMIZATION

Sulfur Tail Gas Thermal Oxidizer Systems By Peter Pickard

Performance of the Boiler and To Improving the Boiler Efficiency Using Cfd Modeling

Fired process heaters 327

The soot and scale problems

HEAT TRANSFER IM LECTURE HOURS PER WEEK THERMODYNAMICS - IM _1

HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS IN A 3D SQUARE CHANNEL LAMINAR FLOW WITH USING BAFFLES 1 Vikram Bishnoi

Quantifying Savings From Improved Boiler Operation

The Three Heat Transfer Modes in Reflow Soldering

Design of heat exchangers

International Journal of Latest Research in Science and Technology Volume 4, Issue 2: Page No , March-April 2015

Control Device Requirements Charts For Oil and Gas Handling and Production Facilities

Heat Transfer Prof. Dr. Ale Kumar Ghosal Department of Chemical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati

HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT IN FIN AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER - A REVIEW

High Flux Steam Reforming

Heat Exchangers. Heat Exchanger Types. Heat Exchanger Types. Applied Heat Transfer Part Two. Topics of This chapter

Calculate Available Heat for Natural Gas Fuel For Industrial Heating Equipment and Boilers

Review on Experimental Analysis and Performance Characteristic of Heat Transfer In Shell and Twisted Tube Heat Exchanger

HVAC Calculations and Duct Sizing

SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT. Thermal Oxidizer

Indirect fired heaters

Coker Furnace On-Line Spalling

Process burners (1) operate in heaters and furnaces in

HEAT EXCHANGERS. Prepared by Bob Heaslip KESCO

Low Emission - Low Maintenance Burner Design

Boiler efficiency measurement. Department of Energy Engineering

Hot Water Boilers and Controls Why Condensing Boilers are Different. Presented Oct. 14, 2008 Long Island Chapter, ASHRAE

Syngas Furnace Tubeskin Temperature Measurement

Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for Combustion. (801)

Condensing Boiler Efficiency

Module 5: Combustion Technology. Lecture 34: Calculation of calorific value of fuels

WATER WALL BOILER FOR AIR AND OXYGEN FIRED CLAUS SULPHUR RECOVERY UNITS

Unsteady State Relief Valve Evaluation. External Pool Fire Scenario

Mathematical Modelling and Design of an Advanced Once-Through Heat Recovery Steam Generator

Simplified Solar Heating Model

NAWTEC CONCEPTS AND EXPERIENCES FOR HIGHER PLANT EFFICIENCY WITH MODERN ADVANCED BOILER AND INCINERATION TECHNOLOGY

Study on performance and methods to optimize thermal oil boiler efficiency in cement industry

Heat Transfer Analysis of Cylindrical Perforated Fins in Staggered Arrangement

OilonChooser Operating Instructions

Module 1 : Conduction. Lecture 5 : 1D conduction example problems. 2D conduction

Steam Generator Boilers Compact Steam Boilers. Rapid Start-Up Safe in Operation

STEAM TURBINE 1 CONTENT. Chapter Description Page. V. Steam Process in Steam Turbine 6. VI. Exhaust Steam Conditions, Extraction and Admission 7

COKE PRODUCTION FOR BLAST FURNACE IRONMAKING

TANKJKT. Heat Transfer Calculations for Jacketed Tanks SCREEN SHOTS. Copyright By chemengsoftware.com

Presentation Outline. Background

Waste to Energy. Anders Damgaard. Thanks to Jiri Hyks and Thomas H Christensen DTU for some slides

Chapter 3. Table E-1. Equilibrium data for SO 2 at 1 atm and 20 o C. x y

CONTENTS. ZVU Engineering a.s., Member of ZVU Group, WASTE HEAT BOILERS Page 2

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF EXERGY IN A CORRUGATED PLATE HEAT EXCHANGER

Approved: Ernesto Gutierrez-Miravete, Engineering Project Adviser

steam centre of excellence Steam Boiler System Optimization

1. A belt pulley is 3 ft. in diameter and rotates at 250 rpm. The belt which is 5 ins. wide makes an angle of contact of 190 over the pulley.

Process Heater Burners, Flare Systems, Thermal Oxidizers and Catalyst Systems. Combustion Technology

Lecture 9, Thermal Notes, 3.054

(This report is endorsed) Industrivej 20, 9900 Frederikshavn, Danmark

EFFICIENCY WITH DIFFERENT GCV OF COAL AND EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITY IN BOILER

Webpage: Volume 3, Issue IV, April 2015 ISSN

Natural Convection. Buoyancy force

FREESTUDY HEAT TRANSFER TUTORIAL 3 ADVANCED STUDIES

Forms of Energy. Freshman Seminar

DIRECT STEAM INJECTION HOT WATER SYSTEMS FOR JACKETED HEATING

Fluid Mechanics: Static s Kinematics Dynamics Fluid

Specific Volume of Liquid (Column 7). The volume per unit of mass in cubic feet per pound.

Chapter. Flares and Stacks. Flares (FLR) Stacks (STK) G2 ICARUS Corporation, 1998.

Hybrid Modeling and Control of a Power Plant using State Flow Technique with Application

I. STEAM GENERATION, BOILER TYPES

DESIGN AND APPLICATION OF HAIRPIN HEAT EXCHANGERS

Thermal Simulation of a Power Electronics Cold Plate with a Parametric Design Study

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY 3, CE 427 DRYING OF SOLIDS

RESPONSE TIME INDEX OF SPRINKLERS

Experimental Study On Heat Transfer Enhancement In A Circular Tube Fitted With U -Cut And V -Cut Twisted Tape Insert

Biomass Boiler House Best Practices. Irene Coyle & Fernando Preto CanmetENERGY

COGENERATION. This section briefly describes the main features of the cogeneration system or a Combined Heat & Power (CHP) system. 36 Units.

FLARE SELECTION AND SIZING (ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINE)

High Efficiency Copper Finned Tube Boilers 750,000-2,000,000 BTU/HR

By K.K.Parthiban / Boiler specialist / Venus Energy Audit System

Numerical Investigation of Heat Transfer Characteristics in A Square Duct with Internal RIBS

Petroleum Refinery Hydrogen Production Unit: Exergy and Production Cost Evaluation

HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER

COMPARISON OF PROCESS FLOWS: FLUID BED COMBUSTOR AND GLASSPACK

Iterative calculation of the heat transfer coefficient

Recover Heat from Boiler Blowdown Water

Comparison of Heat Transfer between a Helical and Straight Tube Heat Exchanger

2.2. Basic Equations for Heat Exchanger Design

Calculating Heat Loss by Mark Crombie, Chromalox

Hydrogen Production via Steam Reforming with CO 2 Capture

HEAT RECOVERY OPTIONS FOR DRYERS AND OXIDIZERS

INTEC Engineering GmbH Heating Solutions for the Marine Industry

Learning Module 4 - Thermal Fluid Analysis Note: LM4 is still in progress. This version contains only 3 tutorials.

INDEX GENERAL

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CLASSIFICATION SOCIETIES. Interpretations of the FTP

Design, Modelling and Simulation of Multiple Effect Evaporators

Boiler Efficiency Workshop

Chapter 18 Temperature, Heat, and the First Law of Thermodynamics. Problems: 8, 11, 13, 17, 21, 27, 29, 37, 39, 41, 47, 51, 57

LESSON 1. HEAT EXCHANGERS

Carbon Dioxide Membrane Separation for Carbon Capture using Direct FuelCell Systems

Transcription:

Fired Heater Design and Simulation Mahesh N. Jethva 1, C. G. Bhagchandani 2 1 M.E. Chemical Engineering Department, L.D. College of Engineering, Ahmedabad-380 015 2 Associate Professor, Chemical Engineering Department, L.D. College of Engineering, Ahmedabad-380 015 Abstract- In fired heaters, heat is released by combustion of fuels into an open space and transferred to process fluids inside tubes. The tubes are ranged along the walls and roof of the combustion chamber. The heat is transferred by direct radiation and convection and also by reflection from refractory walls lining the chamber. The design and rating of a fired heater is a moderately complex operation. Here forced draft fired heater, which is fired by fuel gas, has been treated. For that all required equations and generalizations are listed from different fired heater design methods as per requirement. A fired heater design calculations are performed using Microsoft Excel Programming software and the same fired heater data are used in HTRI simulation software for simulation and comparision purpose. Keywords- Radiant heat transfer, Convective heat transfer, Shield section, Heat balance, HTRI simulation, Comparision. I. Introduction A fired heater is a direct-fired heat exchanger that uses the hot gases of combustion to raise the temperature of a feed flowing through coils of tubes aligned throughout the heater. Depending on the use, these are also called furnaces or process heaters. Some heaters simply deliver the feed at a predetermined temperature to the next stage of the reaction process; others perform reactions on the feed while it travels through the tubes. Fired heaters are used throughout hydrocarbon and chemical processing industries such as refineries, gas plants, petrochemicals, chemicals and synthetics, olefins, ammonia and fertilizer plants. Most of the unit operations require one or more fired heaters as start-up heater, fired reboiler, cracking furnace, process heater, process heater vaporizer, crude oil heater or reformer furnace. Heater fuels include light ends (e.g. refinery gas from the crude units and reformers as well as waste gases blended with natural gas. Residual fuels such as tar, pitch, and Bunker C (heavy oil are also used. Combustion air flow is regulated by positioning the stack damper. Fuel to the burners is regulated from exit feed temperature and firing rate is determined by the level of production desired. A typical fired heater will have following four sections: (1 Radiant section, (2 Shield section, (3 Convection section, and (4 Breeching and stack. A fired heater may be a box (rectangular c/s or vertical (cylindrical c/s in shape. Same way, a fired heater may be classified depending on location of the burners and type of the draft. II. Radiant Section Design A. Radiant Heat Transfer in Radiant Section: Applying basic radiation concepts to process-type heater design, Lobo & Evans developed a generally applicable rating method that is followed with various modifications, by many heater designers. Direct radiation in the radiant section of a direct fired heater can be described by the equation shown below. Q = σαa F(T T Q = Radiant heat transfer, Btu/hr σ = Stefan-Boltzmann constant, 0.173E-8 Btu/ft 2 -hr-r 4 α = Relative effectiveness factor of the tube bank A = Cold plane area of the tube bank, ft 2 F = Exchange factor T = Effective gas temperature in firebox, R T = Average tube wall temperature, R B. Heat Balance In The Radiant Section: There are four primary sources of heat input as well as four sources of heat output to the radiant section. We can now set up the heat balance equation as follows: Q + Q + Q + Q = Q + Q + Q + Q Q = heat liberated by fuel, Btu/hr (LHV Q = sensible heat of combustion air, Btu/hr Q = sensible heat of steam used for oil atomization, Btu/hr Q = sensible heat of recirculated flue gases, Btu/hr Q = heat absorbed by radiant tubes, Btu/hr Q = Radiant heat to shield tubes, Btu/hr Q = heat loss in firebox through furnace walls, bridgewall, casing, etc., Btu/hr Q = heat of flue gases leaving the radiant section, Btu/hr ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 159

C. Total Heat Transfer in Radiant Section (if Shield Section is present: The total heat transfer in firebox when shield section is present will be as follows: Q = σ( A + σ αa F(T T + Q + Q Q = Convective heat transfer to radiant tubes, Btu/hr Q = Convective heat transfer to shield tubes, Btu/hr III. Convection Section Design A. Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient, U : U = 1 R U = Overall heat transfer coefficient, Btu/hr-ft 2 -F R = Total outside thermal resistance, hr-ft 2 -F/Btu And, R = R + R + R R = Outside thermal resistance, hr-ft 2 -F/Btu R = Tube wall thermal resistance, hr-ft 2 -F/Btu R = Inside thermal resistance, hr-ft 2 -F/Btu And the resistances are computed as, R = 1 h R = ( t k ( A A R = ( 1 + R h ( A A h = Effective outside heat transfer coefficient, Btu/hrft -F h = Inside film heat transfer coefficient, Btu/hr-ft 2 -F t = Tube-wall thickness, ft k = Tube wall thermal conductivity, Btu/hr-ft-F A = Outside tube surface area, ft 2 /ft A = Mean area of tube wall, ft 2 /ft A = Inside tube surface area, ft 2 /ft R = Inside fouling resistance, hr-ft 2 -F/Btu B. Inside film heat transfer coefficient, h : The inside film coefficient needed for the thermal calculations may be estimated by several different methods. The API RP530, Appendix C provides the following methods, h = 0.023( k d R. P. ( μ μ. And for vapor flow with R 15,000, h = 0.021( k d R. P. ( T T. Where the Reynolds number is, And the Prandtl number is, R = d G μ P = C μ k h = Heat transfer coefficient, liquid phase, Btu/hr-ft 2 - F k = Thermal conductivity, Btu/hr-ft- F d = Inside diameter of tube, ft μ = Absolute viscosity at bulk temperature, lb/ft-hr μ = Absolute viscosity at wall temperature, lb/ft-hr h = Heat transfer coefficient, vapor phase, Btu/hr-ft 2 - F T = Bulk temperature of vapor, R T = Wall Temperature of vapor, R G = Mass flow of fluid, lb/hr-ft 2 C = Heat capacity of fluid at bulk temperature, Btu/lb- F For two-phase flow, h = h W + h W h = Heat transfer coefficient, two-phase, Btu/hr-ft 2 - F W = Weight fraction of liquid W = Weight fraction of vapor C. Effective outside heat transfer coefficient (h for Fin tubes: (EA + A h = h A h = Average outside heat transfer coefficient, Btu/hrft -F E = Fin efficiency A = Total outside surface area, ft 2 /ft A = Fin outside surface area, ft 2 /ft A = Outside tube surface area, ft 2 /ft i. Average outside heat transfer coefficient, h : For liquid flow with R 10,000, ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 160

1 h = 1 (h + h + R h = Outside heat transfer coefficient, Btu/hr-ft 2 -F h = Outside radiation heat transfer coefficient, Btu/hrft -F R = Outside fouling resistance, hr-ft 2 -F/Btu ii. Outside film heat transfer coefficient, h : h = jg c ( k. c μ j = Colburn heat transfer factor G = Mass velocity based on net free area, lb/hr-ft 2 c = Heat capacity, Btu/lb-F k = Gas thermal conductivity, Btu/hr-ft-F μ = Gas dynamic viscosity, lb/hr-ft iii. Colburn heat transfer factor, j: j = C C C d. ( T + 460 d T + 460. C = Reynolds number correction C = Geometry correction C = Non-equilateral & row correction d = Outside diameter of fin, in d = Outside diameter of tube, in T = Average gas temperature, F T = Average fin temperature, F Reynolds number correction, C :. C = 0.25R R = Reynolds number = d G μ Geometry correction, C : For segmented fin tubes arranged in, a staggered pattern, an inline pattern, For solid fin tubes arranged in, a staggered pattern, C = 0.55 + 0.45e (. C = 0.35 + 0.50e (. an inline pattern, C = 0.35 + 0.65e (. C = 0.20 + 0.65e (. l = Fin height, in s = Fin spacing, in Non-equilateral & row correction, C : For fin tubes arranged in, Staggered pattern, C = 0.7 + 0.7 0.8e (. e (. Inline pattern, C = 1.1 0.75 1.5e (. e (. iv. Mass Velocity, G : And, Net Free Area, A : N = Number of tube rows P = Longitudinal tube pitch, in P = Transverse tube pitch, in G = W A W = Mass flow rate of gas, lb/hr A = Net free area, ft 2 A = A (A L N A = Cross sectional area of box, ft 2 A = Fin tube cross sectional area/ft, ft 2 /ft L = Effective tube length, ft N = Number tubes wide A = N L P A = d + 2l t n l = Fin height, ft d = Outside diameter of tube, ft P = Transverse tube pitch, ft t = fin thickness, ft n = number of fins, fins/ft v. Surface Area Calculations: For the prime tube, A = πd (1 n t And for solid fins, ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 161

A = πd (1 n t + πn (2l d + l + t d + 2l And for segmented fins, T = Gas Temperature, F T = Tube Wall Temperature, F A = πd 1 n t + 0.4πn (d + 0.2 (d + 0.2 2l 0.4 w + t + w t +πn w d = Outside diameter of tube, ft n = number of fins, fins/ft t = fin thickness, ft l = Fin height, ft w =? w = Width of fin segment, ft And then, vi. Fin Efficiency, E: For segmented fins, And for solid fins, And, For segmented fins, And for solid fins, A = A A E = x(0.9 + 0.1x E = y(0.45 ln d d (y 1 + 1 y = x(0.7 + 0.3x x = tanh (mb mb B = l + ( t 2 m = ( h t + w. 6k t w m = ( h 6k t. vii. Fin Tip Temperature, T : The average fin tip temperature is calculated as follows, T = T + T T ( 1 ( e. + e. 2 IV. Excel Programming Design of different sections of fired heater has been performed using Microsoft Excel Programming. For the calculation purpose, different calculation methods and equations are used in the programming. Table 1 Radiant Section Design PROPERTY DETAIL AMOUNT Tube OD, in (d o 8.626 thickness, in (t w 0.05118 No of tubes (N t 40 (Radiant No of tubes (N t 12 (Shield Effective length, ft 35.07 (L e (Radiant Effective length, ft 18.31 (L e (Shield Tube spacing, in (CC 16 (Radiant No of tubes per row 4 (N t/r (Shield Transverse pitch, in 16 (P t (Shield Combustion Fraction excess air 0.15 Firebox Diameter, ft (D 19.98 Process fluid Mean wall 1097.95 temperature, (T t, ⁰R Flue gas Flue gas temperature 2077.1 (T g, ⁰R α (Radiant (- 0.9086 α (Shield Assumed (- 1 A cp (Radiant ft 2 1870.52 A cp (Shield ft 2 97.64 αa cp (Radiant ft 2 1699.51 αa cp (Shield ft 2 97.64 (αa cp r +(αa cp s ft 2 1797.15 A R / A T, ft 2 2103.81 ((αa cp r +(αa cp s Area of Shield 97.64 Section, ft 2 (A s A R, ft 2 306.66 A R / 0.17 ((αa cp r +(αa cp s Partial pressure atm (P 0.256 Mean beam length ft 13.32 P*l atm-ft 3.406 Emissivity E 0.5087 Exchange factor F 0.5129 ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 162

Radiantion Heat Transfer Btu/hr 3.37*10^7 MM Kcal/hr 8.488 Table 2 Convection Section Design PROPERTY DETAIL AMOUNT Fin Height, in (l f 1 Thickness, in (t f 0.05118 No of fins, fins/ft (n f 60 Ther. Cond., Btu/hr-ft- 21.292 ⁰F (k f Tube OD, in (d o 8.626 Thickness, in (t w 0.5 No of rows (N r 5 No of tubes per row 4 (N w Effective tube length, 18.307 ft (L e Pitch, in (P t 16 Wall temp, ⁰F (T w 959 Wall Ther. Cond., 12.83 Btu/hr-ft-⁰F (k w Process Fluid Inlet temp, ⁰F (t 1 609.8 Outlet temp, ⁰F (t 2 621.1 Ther. Cond., (Liq, 0.04939 Btu/hr-ft-⁰F (k l Ther. Cond. (Vap, 0.11995 Btu/hr-ft-⁰F (k v Sp. Heat (Liq, Btu/lb- 0.694 ⁰F (c p,l Sp. Heat (Vap, 0.8985 Btu/lb-⁰F (c p,v Viscosity (Liq, lb/hrft 0.31448 (µ l Viscosity (Vap, lb/hrft 0.0508 (µ v Mass flow rate, lb/hr 1054905.3 Wt fraction (Liq (W l 0.7 Wt fraction (Vap 0.3 (W v Fouling factor,hr-ft 2-0.00391 ⁰F/Btu (R fi Flue Gas Inlet temp, ⁰F (t 1 1472 Outlet temp, ⁰F (t 2 788 Mass flow rate, lb/hr 42620.545 (W g Ther. Cond., Btu/hr-ft- 0.0353 ⁰F (k g Sp. Heat, Btu/lb-⁰F 0.3087 (c p,g Viscosity, lb/hr-ft (µ g 0.0883 Inside Film HT coefficient h i, Btu/hr-ft 2 -⁰F 461.16 Mass Velocity of Flue G n, lb/hr-ft 2 1017.79 Gas Colburn HT Factor j 0.00543 Outside Film HT coefficient h c, Btu/hr-ft 2 -⁰F 2.0291 Average Outside HT h o, Btu/hr-ft 2 -⁰F 2.599 co-efficient Fin Efficiency E 0.9838 Effective Outside HT h e, Btu/hr-ft 2 -⁰F 2.5595 co-efficient Overall HT coefficient Uo, Btu/hr-ft 2 -⁰F 1.9348 LMTD ⁰F 430.28 HT Area ft 2 10102.93 Convection Heat Btu/hr 8.4*10^6 Transfer MM Kcal/hr 2.119 Table 3 Heat Balance PROPERTY DETAIL AMOUNT Assumed amount of % 80 Radiant HT Assumed amount of % 20 Convection HT Thermal Efficiency % (given 90.7 Total Heat Input (Q fuel MM Kcal/hr 11.70 Total Heat Transferred MM Kcal/hr 10.61 (Q ht (given Radiant HT (Q r MM Kcal/hr 8.488 Convection HT (Q c MM Kcal/hr 2.122 Heat Loss (Q loss MM Kcal/hr (2.5% 0.2924 of Q fuel Heat out from HT area to stack (Q stack MM Kcal/hr (=Q fuel -Q ht -Q loss 0.7955 V. HTRI Introduction HTRI Xchanger Suite 6.0 combines in a single graphical user environment the design, rating, and simulation of fired heaters (Xfh. Xfh simulates the behavior of fired heaters. The program calculates the performance of the radiant section for cylindrical and box (cabin heaters and the convection section of fired heater. It also designs process heater tubes using API 530 and performs combustion calculations. Xfh contains different calculation modules to simulate the different parts of a fired heater. One can run these modules separately or in combination to model part or all of a fired heater. VI. Comparision of given/calculated data and simulated data The following table of comparision between given or calculated data or results and simulated results proves that the prepared design module is trustable tool for fired heater design. ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 163

fired heater design and simulation has been performed in satisfactory way. Table 4 Comparision of given/calculated data and simulated data PROPERTY DETAIL CAL. DATA SIMU. DATA Overall Performance Heat duty MM 10.61 10.73 Efficiency (LHV % 90.7 85 Heat release (Total MM 11.69 12.63 Fuel LHV kcal/kg 13260 13278.1 Process fluid temp at C 327.28 327.88 crossover Process fluid temp at heater outlet C 346 346.64 Radiant Section Fuel gas temp out C 800 858.71 Average flux rate -m 2 29000 25611.2 Duty MM 8.488 7.987 Surface area m 2 166.96 311.87 Pressure drop kgf/cm 2 1.292 1.75 Convection Section Fuel gas temp out C 420 381.56 Outside film m 12.5 17.63 coefficient 2 -C Inside film coefficient m 2251.58 1854.99 2 -C Overall HT m 9.45 12.7 coefficient (U 2 -C Convection duty MM 2.122 2.7424 Surface area m 2 938.59 985.27 EMTD C 221.27 220.4 Draft at bridgewall mm H 2 O 2.3043 2.54 Pressure drop kgf/cm 2 0.58 0.547 Burners Fuel rate kg/hr 882.35 855.2 References [1] Process Heat Transfer by Donald Q. Kern, [2] http://www.heatexchangerdesign.com, [3] API 560, Fired Heaters for General Refinery Service, 4 th edition, August 2007, [4] HTRI Xchanger Suite 6.0 software, [5] HTRI Manual and Help file VII. Conclusion Using Microsoft Excel Programming software, a design module has been prepared which can be used for different data values and gives satisfactory results. In present case, the design module gives required radiant heat transfer and convective heat transfer in the fired heater. The specified fired heater is also simulated in HTRI heat exchanger suite 6.0 using the same fired heater data which are used in MS Excel design module. The table of comparision illustrates that the ISSN: 2231-5381 http://www.internationaljournalssrg.org Page 164