Delay Measurement in OTN networks. Apodis Application Note



Similar documents
Guidelines for Application of OTN TCM

Interfaces and Payload Testing

10G LAN PHY over G.709 OTN: A Service Provider Prospective

Performance Management and Fault Management. 1 Dept. of ECE, SRM University

SDH and WDM: a look at the physical layer

SDH and WDM A look at the physical layer

WDM network management

Making Ethernet Over SONET Fit a Transport Network Operations Model

Lecture 12 Transport Networks (SONET) and circuit-switched networks

802.3ah Operations Management: Requirements From A Diverse Services Provider

New WAN PHY Approach Proposals

Computer Networks. Definition of LAN. Connection of Network. Key Points of LAN. Lecture 06 Connecting Networks

Transport Layer Protocols

DS-3 Technology and Testing Overview

Enhancing High-Speed Telecommunications Networks with FEC

REMOTE MONITORING MATRIX

VoIP network planning guide

Relationship between SMP, ASON, GMPLS and SDN

Modultech MT-XDFx-xx192-08(04)CD 80 (40) km DWDM XFP module with built-in FEC wrapper Description

How To Test For 10 Gigabit Ethernet At 10 Gb/S

Ethernet Service OAM. Standards and Functionality. Connectivity Fault Management (CFM) Fault Detection. White Paper

WHITE PAPER : TROUBLESHOOTING FEATURES for Media Conversion Products

Verifying Metro Ethernet Quality of Service

Multiplexing. Multiplexing is the set of techniques that allows the simultaneous transmission of multiple signals across a single physical medium.

Optical network diagnostics capabilities for meeting high level Services

The Economics of Cisco s nlight Multilayer Control Plane Architecture

The Key Benefits of OTN Networks

Module 5. Broadcast Communication Networks. Version 2 CSE IIT, Kharagpur

Campus Network Best Practices: Core and Edge Networks

Application Notes. Introduction. Contents. Managing IP Centrex & Hosted PBX Services. Series. VoIP Performance Management. Overview.

Evolution of telecom network infrastructure for broadcast and interactive applications

Acterna DSL Services Tester TPI 350+ Application Highlights

- Hubs vs. Switches vs. Routers -

Procedure: You can find the problem sheet on Drive D: of the lab PCs. 1. IP address for this host computer 2. Subnet mask 3. Default gateway address

Switch Fabric Implementation Using Shared Memory

CS268 Exam Solutions. 1) End-to-End (20 pts)

CCNA R&S: Introduction to Networks. Chapter 5: Ethernet

Using & Offering Wholesale Ethernet Network and Operational Considerations

BTS Backhaul by Satellite

Ultra High-Speed SONET Fiber-Optic Transmission System

Central Office Testing of Network Services

The MTS-8000 Transport Module SDH, PDH, and Ethernet Test Module for the MTS-8000

Fiber Channel Over Ethernet (FCoE)

How To Deliver High Quality Telephony Over A Network

Internet Protocol version 4 Part I

This topic describes dial peers and their applications.

Principles of Circuit Switched Networks. John S Graham Indiana University

PART III. OPS-based wide area networks

Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) Transmission Methods

Advancements in field measurement of Ethernet performance

Interworking issues between 10GBE WAN and existing transmission network

Visualizations and Correlations in Troubleshooting

Course 1. General view on the fixed telephone network. Digital networks. General aspects. Definitions.

SIP Trunking and Voice over IP

TCP over Multi-hop Wireless Networks * Overview of Transmission Control Protocol / Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) Internet Protocol (IP)

A Brief Overview of SONET Technology

Final for ECE374 05/06/13 Solution!!

File Transfer Protocol (FTP) Throughput Testing by Rachel Weiss

MPLS Environment. To allow more complex routing capabilities, MPLS permits attaching a

Corporate Network Services of Tomorrow Business-Aware VPNs

Solving the Big Dilemma of Big Data

Net.Audit distributed Test System

DESIGN AND VERIFICATION OF LSR OF THE MPLS NETWORK USING VHDL

CS 640: Introduction to Computer Networks. Goals of This Class. Goal of Networking. Page 1. Understand principles and practice of networking

RFC 2544 Testing of Ethernet Services in Telecom Networks

It explains the differences between the Plesiochronous Digital Hierarchy and the Synchronous Digital Hierarchy.

A Transport Protocol for Multimedia Wireless Sensor Networks

MPLS-TP. Future Ready. Today. Introduction. Connection Oriented Transport

10 Gigabit Ethernet WAN PHY

Frequently Asked Questions

Course 12 Synchronous transmission multiplexing systems used in digital telephone networks

Multi-protocol Label Switching

Module 15: Network Structures

TCP in Wireless Networks

SONET and DWDM: Competing Yet Complementary Technologies for The Metro Network

MENTER Overview. Prepared by Mark Shayman UMIACS Contract Review Laboratory for Telecommunications Science May 31, 2001

Construction of High-speed and High-reliability Optical Networks for Social Infrastructure

The OSI model has seven layers. The principles that were applied to arrive at the seven layers can be briefly summarized as follows:

APS Performance Testers APS Time Verification MP159x Network Performance Tester

Analysis of IP Network for different Quality of Service

TDM services over IP networks

Fundamentals of Telecommunications

TCP for Wireless Networks

The Power of SA as a SLM Tool

Chapter 4. Distance Vector Routing Protocols

Campus Network Best Practices: Core and Edge Networks

Operating System Concepts. Operating System 資 訊 工 程 學 系 袁 賢 銘 老 師

2-Pair HDSL1 Adtran Fiber Optic Link System

Ring Local Area Network. Ring LANs

VLANs. Application Note

Network Master Gigabit Ethernet Tester. Network Master Gigabit Ethernet Tester. Introduction. By Ole Sørensen Product manager.

WaveReady CFM. Optical Link Monitoring System: Continuous Fiber Monitor

10GbE Implementation Architectures

Smart Solutions for Network IP Migration

Introduction. Background

What is Network Latency and Why Does It Matter?

Introduction, Rate and Latency

STANDPOINT FOR QUALITY-OF-SERVICE MEASUREMENT

Cisco Prime Optical. Overview

Transcription:

Delay Measurement in OTN networks Apodis Application Note Leon Bruckman System Engineering lbruckman@iplight.com April 2010 2010 IP Light, Inc.

Background. OTN standardization efforts got under way seeking an optical transport technology that would replace the legacy SONET/SDH infrastructure prevailing in legacy TDM oriented networks. From the early days of telecommunications it was apparent that maintenance tools were required in order to avoid charging users during down time, and to identify and isolate the fault causing element to support fast and cost effective repair actions. Along with hardfailures detecting tools, soft degradations detecting tools were usually based on BER monitoring and used to detect potential failure sources in the network. With the advent of QoS sensitive applications and Service Level Agreement (SLA) based services, the ability to monitor the network performance became a critical issue for service providers. The main performance parameters influencing the service performance are BER and delay; different levels of BER-Delay are required for different services. Some services such as file transfer are not sensitive to delay but are somewhat sensitive to BER, others such as voice are less sensitive to BER but are very sensitive to delay, and others such as video conferencing are sensitive to both BER and delay. OTN provides strong BER monitoring tools. Some of these tools are similar to the ones used in SONET/SDH networks (BIP), incorporating the additional TCM BIP function that enables to locate error sources in multi-domain networks. FEC corrected symbol rate can also be used as a degradation monitoring tool with the advantage that correction actions can be initiated even before any actual service degradation is perceived by the users. Delay measurement has always been a more difficult task. SONET/SDH does not provide standard in-service delay measurement tools and as a result only sporadic out-of-service measurements can be taken. Another option is to rely on higher telecommunication layers to measure the delay, but then it is very difficult to isolate the delay component being contributed by each subtending layer to the overall measured delay. Delay sources. In an OTN network the main delay sources are: - Optical fiber delay approximately 5µsec/Kilometer - Equipment delay FIFOs Note that since OTN is a deterministic transport technology there is no congestion related delay variation.

Delay variation for an operating system can be related to: - Temperature variations - Route changes - Equipment configuration changes - Equipment replacement OTN Delay Measurement (DM) function. In order facilitate in-service delay measurement, a new function was added to the OTN overhead. This function reuses one of the formerly reserved bytes in the ODU overhead as shown in Figure 1. 16 bytes overhead FAS MFAS SM GCC0 Reserved PS* PS Reserved DM TCM/ACT TCM6 TCM5 TCM4 FTFL PS PS TCM3 TCM2 TCM1 PM EXP PS PS GCC1 GCC2 APS/PCC Reserved PSI PS DM t1 DM t2 DM t3 DM t4 DM t5 DM t6 DM pm RES Figure 1: DM field Delay is measured by transmitting a known pattern in the selected bit of the DM filed, and measuring the elapsed time until the pattern is received back as shown in Figure 2...11111111110000000000000000000.. Delay..00000000000000000001111111111.. Figure 2: Delay measurement pattern Note that the measured time is the Round Trip Time (RTT) between the measuring points as shown in Figure 3. Since the DM field appears once in every OTN frame, the delay measurement accuracy is in the order of an OTN frame which in turn is relative to the measured OTN signal rate.

Optical domain Optical OTN domain Optical Sub-network Sub-network Subnetwork Pattern Insertion (ODU OH) Pattern loop back End of measurement Optical line amplifier (OTS termination) Optical cross connect/add-drop/terminal mux (OMS termination) 3R regeneration (OCh, OTU termination) Delay Measurement / Loopback NE Figure 3: RTT delay measurement As can be seen in Figure 2 a bit in the DM field is assigned to each TCM level, and one is assigned to the ODU path. With this scheme the delay of each domain (Figure 4.a) as well as the end- to-end delay (Figure 4.b) can be measured. Delay functionality enabled Delay functionality disabled or legacy NE OTU client OTN OTU client ODU Delay measurement Figure 4.a: Domain delay measurement

Delay functionality enabled Delay functionality disabled or legacy NE Non-OTU client OTN Non-OTU client ODU Delay measurement DM state machine Figure 4.b: End-to-end delay measurement Figure 5 shows the state machine used by a management element in order to implement the DM function. Delay can be measured on a continuous basis since the measurement itself does not impact any other functionality, and it can be simultaneously measured for all TCMs and for the end-to-end path. However, since delay in optical networks is almost stationary, changing at a very slow pace, we envision that the DM will be activated only periodically for each path and for each TCM. Enable Delay Loopback Disabled Disable Delay Loopback Active Listening Disable Delay Initiator Enable Delay Initiator Delay pattern received Loop back to transmitter Delay measurement triggered Send pattern and Start timer Ready to start measurement Measurement in progress Delay pattern received Stop timer Figure 5: DM state machine

One way delay measurement In OTN networks since usually a path is bidirectional, both path directions follow the same route, and the delay is not influenced by the network state (congestion), one way delay may be reasonably approximated as ~RTT/2. Care should be taken though when unidirectional path protection is being provided for the path under test. When using unidirectional protection only the failed direction will be redirected to the protection facility, thus possibly routing each path direction through a different route, as shown in Figure 6. A A B = B A = RTT/2 B A A B B A RTT/2 B Apodis Figure 6: Unidirectional protected path In order to facilitate delay measurement in OTN networks IP Light has incorporated in Apodis the required features to support DM. Using Apodis based systems users can measure delay on any interface, at any OTN level and for any of the TCMs as well as for the end-toend path. A DM function is provided for each Apodis interface which can be activated independently and in parallel with the DM function of other interfaces. Furthermore, users can program the selected byte for DM (the field defined by the standard being the default) and the character to be sent and monitored. To use the Apodis DM feature the user selects the OTN level and the desired TCM or end-toend path, programs DM loop back in the remote end-point Apodis, and writes the DM character. Once the character is received back by the test initiating Apodis it issues a positive indication, including an associated maskable interrupt, and provides the measured delay. Bits within the DM field that are not being used for the DM function can be transparently passed through, supporting nested TCM schemes.

About IP Light: IP Light is developing Apodis, a product family of leading edge OTN processors designed to facilitate the introduction of new OTN capabilities and service applications. IP Light is headquartered at 4 Hashiloach St. POB 7209, Petach-Tikva, 49520, Israel Office: +972-3-7217810 Fax:+972-3-9215076 info@iplight.com