Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences



Similar documents
HiPer RT-PCR Teaching Kit

Just the Facts: A Basic Introduction to the Science Underlying NCBI Resources

Protocols. Internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) region. Niklaus J. Grünwald, Frank N. Martin, and Meg M. Larsen (2013)

DNA: A Person s Ultimate Fingerprint

The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology

The Techniques of Molecular Biology: Forensic DNA Fingerprinting

Real-Time PCR Vs. Traditional PCR

ABSTRACT. Promega Corporation, Updated September Campbell-Staton, S.

Amazing DNA facts. Hands-on DNA: A Question of Taste Amazing facts and quiz questions

RT-PCR: Two-Step Protocol

STA DARD OPERATI G PROCEDURE FOR THE DETECTIO OF AFRICA SWI E FEVER VIRUS (ASFV) BY CO VE TIO AL POLYMERASE CHAI REACTIO (PCR)

First Strand cdna Synthesis

Effects of Antibiotics on Bacterial Growth and Protein Synthesis: Student Laboratory Manual

Forensic DNA Testing Terminology

Intended Use: The kit is designed to detect the 5 different mutations found in Asian population using seven different primers.

PicoMaxx High Fidelity PCR System

DNA and Forensic Science

IIID 14. Biotechnology in Fish Disease Diagnostics: Application of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

Introduction. Preparation of Template DNA

Transformation Protocol

Introduction To Real Time Quantitative PCR (qpcr)

Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics

RevertAid Premium First Strand cdna Synthesis Kit

BacReady TM Multiplex PCR System

Rapid Acquisition of Unknown DNA Sequence Adjacent to a Known Segment by Multiplex Restriction Site PCR

Identification of the VTEC serogroups mainly associated with human infections by conventional PCR amplification of O-associated genes

Recombinant DNA & Genetic Engineering. Tools for Genetic Manipulation

1/12 Dideoxy DNA Sequencing

Essentials of Real Time PCR. About Sequence Detection Chemistries

Lab 10: Bacterial Transformation, part 2, DNA plasmid preps, Determining DNA Concentration and Purity

Cloning Blunt-End Pfu DNA Polymerase- Generated PCR Fragments into pgem -T Vector Systems

Algorithms in Computational Biology (236522) spring 2007 Lecture #1

Reverse Transcription System

Mitochondrial DNA Analysis

Sequencing Guidelines Adapted from ABI BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit and Roswell Park Cancer Institute Core Laboratory website

Bio-Informatics Lectures. A Short Introduction

Crime Scenes and Genes

Improved methods for site-directed mutagenesis using Gibson Assembly TM Master Mix

Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Phylogeny from DNA Sequences When Substitution Rates Differ over Sites1

How many of you have checked out the web site on protein-dna interactions?

RETRIEVING SEQUENCE INFORMATION. Nucleotide sequence databases. Database search. Sequence alignment and comparison

Introduction to Bioinformatics AS Laboratory Assignment 6

4. DNA replication Pages: Difficulty: 2 Ans: C Which one of the following statements about enzymes that interact with DNA is true?

Procedures For DNA Sequencing

Cloning GFP into Mammalian cells

All-in-One First-Strand cdna Synthesis Kit

GENOTYPING ASSAYS AT ZIRC

CompleteⅡ 1st strand cdna Synthesis Kit

GenScript BloodReady TM Multiplex PCR System

Gene mutation and molecular medicine Chapter 15

Real-time quantitative RT -PCR (Taqman)

Worksheet - COMPARATIVE MAPPING 1

Gene Mapping Techniques

Introduction to cloning

Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Methylation Analysis Preparing Samples for the Illumina Sequencing Platform

quantitative real-time PCR, grain, simplex DNA extraction: PGS0426 RT-PCR: PGS0494 & PGS0476

Troubleshooting the Single-step PCR Site-directed Mutagenesis Procedure Intended to Create a Non-functional rop Gene in the pbr322 Plasmid

Protein Sequence Analysis - Overview -

Genomic DNA Extraction Kit INSTRUCTION MANUAL

Thermo Scientific Phusion Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit #F-541

HCS Exercise 1 Dr. Jones Spring Recombinant DNA (Molecular Cloning) exercise:

Thermo Scientific DyNAmo cdna Synthesis Kit for qrt-pcr Technical Manual

Taq98 Hot Start 2X Master Mix

ab Hi-Fi cdna Synthesis Kit

1. Molecular computation uses molecules to represent information and molecular processes to implement information processing.

pcas-guide System Validation in Genome Editing

Technical Manual No Update Date

Objectives: Vocabulary:

Terra PCR Direct Polymerase Mix User Manual

VLLM0421c Medical Microbiology I, practical sessions. Protocol to topic J10

BIO 3350: ELEMENTS OF BIOINFORMATICS PARTIALLY ONLINE SYLLABUS

2. True or False? The sequence of nucleotides in the human genome is 90.9% identical from one person to the next. False (it s 99.

Plant Genomic DNA Extraction using CTAB

Chapter 6 DNA Replication

RT rxns. RT rxns TRANSCRIPTME Enzyme Mix (1) 40 µl 2 x 50 µl 5 x 40 µl

DNA Sample preparation and Submission Guidelines

Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy

Genome Explorer For Comparative Genome Analysis

A STUDY ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER TUTORING AS A TEACHING METHOD IN HIGH SCHOOL BIOTECHNOLOGY LABS. June Camerlengo. Santa Fe High School

PHYML Online: A Web Server for Fast Maximum Likelihood-Based Phylogenetic Inference

Data Analysis for Ion Torrent Sequencing

Lecture 13: DNA Technology. DNA Sequencing. DNA Sequencing Genetic Markers - RFLPs polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products of biotechnology

Using Digital Photography to Supplement Learning of Biotechnology. Methods

IMBB Genomic DNA purifica8on

The Variability in the Fungal Ribosomal DNA (ITS1, ITS2, and 5.8 S rrna Gene): Its Biological Meaning and Application in Medical Mycology

CLONING IN ESCHERICHIA COLI

Activity IT S ALL RELATIVES The Role of DNA Evidence in Forensic Investigations

SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix -Plus-

Molecular typing of VTEC: from PFGE to NGS-based phylogeny

From DNA to Protein. Proteins. Chapter 13. Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes. The Path From Genes to Proteins. All proteins consist of polypeptide chains

Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA (Chapter 9) Lecture Materials for Amy Warenda Czura, Ph.D. Suffolk County Community College

EZ Load Molecular Rulers. Catalog Numbers bp bp bp PCR bp kb Precision Mass

restriction enzymes 350 Home R. Ward: Spring 2001

Biotechnology Explorer

DNA Integrity Number (DIN) For the Assessment of Genomic DNA Samples in Real-Time Quantitative PCR (qpcr) Experiments

360 Master Mix. , and a supplementary 360 GC Enhancer.

Core Bioinformatics. Degree Type Year Semester Bioinformàtica/Bioinformatics OB 0 1

PTC DNA Fingerprint Gel

Transcription:

Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences Protein coding gene, cels2 shows congruency with 16S rrna phylogeny in highly evolving streptomycetes Madison P Munar 1,2*, Young-Geun Eom 1, Yeong-Suk Kim 1 and Tae-Jong Kim 1 1 Department of Forest Products and Biotechnology, College of Forest Science, Kookmin University, 77, Jeongneung-ro, Seongbuk-gu, 136-702, Seoul, South Korea 2 Department of Biology, College of Science, University of the Philippines Baguio, Governor Pack Road, Baguio City 2600, Philippines ABSTRACT This paper examined the potential of putative cellulose binding protein gene, cels2, in defining the molecular phylogeny of streptomycetes, a highly evolving and important soil-dwelling bacterial species. There have been numerous attempts on the use of molecular markers in establishing the phylogeny of this medically important group. However, cellulase genes have not yet been investigated. Results highlighted the higher evolutionary rate in cels2 gene (5%) than 16S rrna (0.5%) making it a good candidate as a molecular chronometer for future evolutionary studies in streptomycetes. Moreover, this study showed the congruency of tree topology using three different building algorithms, Unrooted Neighbor-Joining, Unrooted Maximum- Likelihood and Unrooted Unweighted-Pair Group with Arithmetic Mean of a protein coding gene and 16S rrna which were analyzed simultaneously using multiple sequence alignment. Keywords: cels2, 16S rrna, Streptomyces coelicolor M145, phylogeny, Neighbor-Joining, Maximum-Likelihood *Corresponding author January February 2015 RJPBCS 6(1) Page No. 108

INTRODUCTION Streptomycetes are soil-dwelling bacterial species that are reported to produce a plethora of secondary metabolites such as antifungal, antibacterial and anti-cancer drugs. Streptomycetes are also reported to produce industrially important compounds such as cellulase. The high guanine and cytosine bases in the genome of this bacterial species are of great interest because this made streptomycetes a highly evolving bacterial species [1]. At present, there are about 800 unidentified strains of streptomycetes and the growing number of these unidentified strains is becoming a challenge. Several studies were conducted in investigating the molecular phylogeny of streptomycetes which include the use of molecular markers such as ATP synthase (atpd), DNA gyrase subunit B (gyrb), DNA repair gene (reca), RNA polymerase (rpob), tryptophan synthase (trpb) and 16S rrna [2,3]. Previous researches suggested to look into more robust and highly polymorphic molecular markers that would resolve the confusing taxonomy of this bacterial group. Cellulase genes, however, were not yet fully investigated in streptomycetes. Cellulase genes in the genome of the model actinomycete, S. coelicolor A3 (2), were reported to be found in the arms of the linear chromosome of this fungal-like bacterial species [1]. Basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) suggests that there are about 19 species of Streptomyces with reported cellulase coding genes. This relatively low turnout of genetically related species indicates that cellulase genes in streptomycetes are not well studied and their importance as agents in carbon cycling appears yet under appreciated. Control strain MATERIALS AND METHODS Pure culture strain of S. coelicolor M145 was obtained from the Extract Collection of Useful Microorganisms (ECUM), Myongji University in South Korea. This was cultured in R5 minus agar medium which was modified from R5 medium that lacks KH 2 PO 4, CaCl 2 and L-proline [4]. The strain was incubated for five days at 28 C prior to extraction of chromosomal DNA. DNA Extraction Bacterial cells grown in R5 minus agar plate were aseptically transferred in 100 ml of R5 minus broth medium. The inoculated broth medium was incubated at 28 C with 200 rpm for three days in a shaking incubator (Innova 4300, New Brunswick Scientific Co., Inc, Edison, NJ, USA). About five hundred microliters of bacterial cells were collected in a microcentrifuge tube by centrifugation at 13,500 rpm. DNA was extracted using CTAB method [5]. Primer design There are 11 cellulase genes in S. coelicolor A3 (2) according to the genomic project (http://www.sanger.ac.kr). The DNA sequence of cels2 gene (SCO1188) was viewed and annotated using the Artemis program. Homologous sequences of cels2 gene were identified using protein BLAST search in the database of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Among the homologous sequences were S. coelicolor A3(2) (AL939108.1 and AL939124.1), Streptomyces sp. THW31(HQ2812.1), S. avermitilis MA-4680 (BA000030.3), S. hygroscopicus subsp. jinggangensis 5008 (CP003275.1), S. flavogriseus ATCC 33331 (CP002475.1), Kitasatospora setae KM-6054 (AP010968.1), S. scabiei 87.22 (FN554889.1), Streptomyces sp. SirexAA-E (CP0023.1), S. violaceusniger Tu 4113 (CP0024.1). Conserved sequences among the homologous strains were identified and oligonucleotide primers were designed using Primer3 program. The forward sequence with 19 base pairs having 57.89 % GC ratio (CTGTACAACTGGTTCGCCG) and the reverse sequence with 23 base pairs having 47.83% GC ratio (GAGAAGAAGTTTTCCTGGCTGTC) of primers were used during the polymerase chain reaction for the amplification of cels2 gene. January February 2015 RJPBCS 6(1) Page No. 109

Polymerase Chain Reaction The optimized PCR mixture consisted of 1x e-taq buffer, 0.2 mm dntp, 0.8 µm/l each of forward and reverse primers, 0.05 U/µL e-taq polymerase (SolGent Co., Ltd), 1.0 µl of extracted DNA template was used and the total volume was adjusted to 10 µl per reaction volume. The optimized PCR profile cycle began with pre-denaturation at 94 C for two minutes for one cycle, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 C for 20 seconds, annealing at 61 C for 40 seconds and extension at 72 C for one minute and then a final extension at 94 C for five minutes for one cycle. PCR gradient machine (BIOER, Genepro) was used in this study. Five microliters of PCR products with 1.0 µl 6X loading dye (Invitrogen) were loaded into 1% agarose gel for electrophoresis using MUPID-2 plus (Mini gel electrophoresis) at 120V for 20 minutes. One kb ladder (Invitrogen) was used for size estimation in the gel electrophoresis. Ethidium bromide was used for gel staining for 15 minutes with constant shaking and the gel was de-stained with distilled water for another 15 minutes with constant shaking using Orbital shaker (FINEPCR). PCR amplicons were observed using Gel Documentation System (BIORAD). PCR amplicons were excised from gel and were sent to SolGent, Korea for sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis cels2 gene and 16S rrna deduced amino acid sequences were simultaneously analyzed using three different building algorithms which include two distance-based tree methods, Neighbor-Joining (NJ) [6] and Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) [7] and one character-based tree method, Maximum-Likelihood (ML) [8]. The logic behind the use of three different building methods is that if a clade or certain grouping of species was supported by different building methods, with all their advantages and disadvantages, the phylogenetic tree obtained is from the data under analysis and is not biased from the method being used [9]. Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) model was used for distance correction [10]. Bootstrap analysis using 1000 replicates was employed throughout the analyses to estimate the confidence limit of each divergence scenario [11]. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION NCBI annotated nine strains of Streptomyces with reported cels2 gene which includes S. coelicolor A3 (2) (AL939108.1), S. ambofaciens ATCC 23877 (AM2383.1), S. viridosporus T7A (AF126376.1), S. griseus subsp. griseus NBRC 13350 (AP009493.1), S. flavogriseus ATCC 33331 (CP002475.1), S. halstedii (U51222.1), Streptomyces sp. THW31 (HQ2812.1), Streptomyces sp. SirexAA-E (CP0023.1) and Kitasatospora setae KM-6054 (AP010968.1). However, only six strains with available 16S rrna sequences were used in the phylogenetic analyses (Table 1). DNA sequences of unknown streptomycetes isolated from soil were also included in the phylogenetic analyses. Table 1: Strains and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in the phylogenetic analyses of cels2 gene and 16S rrna in streptomycetes. Strain Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) Streptomyces sp. SirexAA-E Streptomyces hygroscopicus subsp. jinggangensis 5008 Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus NBRC 13350 Streptomyces flavogriseus ATCC 33331 Kitasatospora setae KM-6054 GenBank accession number AL939108.1 CP0023.1 CP003275.1 AP009493.1 CP002475.1 AP010968.1 Based on cels2 phylogenetic trees (Fig. 1, 2 and 3), S. coelicolor M145 is identical with S. coelicolor A3 (2) and this was supported by % bootstrap value. The phylogenetic tree also suggests that all of the unidentified strains are unique to those species available in the public database. Notably, strains 119.13, 119.103 and 119.104 were consistently grouped in separate cluster from other strains in NJ, ML and UPGMA analyses (Fig. 1, 2 and 3, respectively). Streptomyces. sp. SirexAA-E and S. flavogriseus were consistently January February 2015 RJPBCS 6(1) Page No. 110

grouped in NJ, ML and UPGMA building methods and these were supported by 92% - 95% bootstrap values. Tree topology and clustering of species were congruent in the three building methods. 119.26 119.61 119.127 119.123 41 119.120 119.110 119.101 61 119.100 119.94 27 119.7 119.97 58 54 57 119.5 119.102 119.2 119.117 119.15 119.82 96 77 119.64 119.83 119.92 Streptomyces coelicolor M145 59 39 44 119.13 119.103 119.104 96 0.05 Figure 1: Unrooted Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree of Streptomyces strains based on cels2 gene amino acid sequences. Unknown isolates of Streptomyces were found different from strains present in NCBI. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values from 1000 resampled datasets. Bar indicates sequence divergence. Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) model was used for distance correction. (*) Homologous sequences from GenBank (see Table 1). 77 65 22 51 40 44 119.127 119.26 119.123 119.120 119.110 119.101 119.100 119.94 119.7 119.97 119.61 119.5 119.102 119.2 119.117 80 119.15 119.82 119.64 69 119.83 68 119.92 98 Streptomyces coelicolor M145 25 22 119.13 21 14 119.103 90 119.104 92 0.2 Figure 2: Unrooted Maximum-Likelihood (ML) tree of Streptomyces strains based on cels2 gene amino acid sequences. Unknown isolates of Streptomyces were found different from strains present in NCBI. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values from 1000 resampled datasets. Bar indicates sequence divergence. Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) model was used for distance correction. (*) Homologous sequences from GenBank (see Table 1). January February 2015 RJPBCS 6(1) Page No. 111

119.7 119.61 119.94 119.123 41 119.101 119.127 119.100 42 119.110 119.120 12 119.26 119.97 119.102 39 119.5 58 119.2 43 119.117 119.15 119.82 119.64 62 119.83 119.92 Streptomyces coelicolor M145 81 27 29 71 119.13 119.103 119.104 95 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 Figure 3: Unrooted Unweighted Pair Group with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) tree of Streptomyces strains based on cels2 gene amino acid sequences. Unknown isolates of Streptomyces were found different from strains present in NCBI. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values from 1000 resampled datasets. Bar indicates sequence divergence. Jones- Taylor-Thornton (JTT) model was used for distance correction. (*) Homologous sequences from GenBank (see Table 1). 76 54 30 32 80 119.120 12820 119.123 12893 119.117 12638 119.110 11598 119.101 23 119.100 9873 119.97 9820 36 119.7 10300 119.127 13202 119.5 13 98 119.102 92 119.94 9753 119.15 129 96 119.103 10169 119.104 10328 119.13 12388 119.61 114 119.26 13917 45 78 119.64 13415 119.2 9085 119.82 9089 119.83 9133 119.92 9697 0.005 Figure 4: Unrooted Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree of Streptomyces strains based on 16S rrna amino acid sequences. Unknown isolates of Streptomyces were supported by 16S rrna phylogenetic tree to be different strains from those strains registered in NCBI. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values from 1000 resampled datasets. Bar indicates sequence divergence. Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) model was used for distance correction. (*) Homologous sequences from GenBank (see Table 1). S. coelicolor M145 was not included in the phylogenetic analysis due to the unavailability of 16S rrna sequence. Nonetheless, gene-based phylogenetic tree was observed to be supported by the highly conserved molecular chronometer, 16S rrna, especially in discriminating unidentified strains. January February 2015 RJPBCS 6(1) Page No. 112

119.120 12820 119.123 12893 119.117 12638 119.110 11598 119.101 23 119.100 9873 119.97 9820 119.7 10300 119.127 13202 119.5 13 98 119.102 92 119.94 9753 119.15 129 92 119.26 13917 91 119.103 10169 96 119.104 10328 64 119.13 12388 119.61 114 50 74 61 119.64 13415 50 119.92 9697 119.2 9085 97 119.82 9089 119.83 9133 51 79 0.01 Figure 5: Unrooted Maximum-Likelihood (ML) tree of Streptomyces strains based on 16S rrna amino acid sequences. Unknown isolates of Streptomyces were supported by 16S rrna phylogenetic tree to be different strains from those strains registered in NCBI. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values from 1000 resampled datasets. Bar indicates sequence divergence. Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) model was used for distance correction. (*) Homologous sequences from GenBank (see Table 1). S. coelicolor M145 was not included in the phylogenetic analysis due to the unavailability of 16S rrna sequence. Nonetheless, gene-based phylogenetic tree was observed to be supported by the highly conserved molecular chronometer, 16S rrna, especially in discriminating unidentified strains. 119.2 9085 68 119.83 9133 119.82 9089 119.92 9697 83 119.64 13415 83 88 79 48 119.26 13917 19 119.61 114 98 119.13 12388 119.103 10169 97 119.104 10328 98 119.5 13 84 119.102 92 119.15 129 119.94 9753 72 119.7 10300 119.120 12820 65 119.101 23 119.127 13202 119.117 12638 119.123 12893 119.110 11598 119.97 9820 119.100 9873 0.030 0.025 0.020 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.000 Figure 6: Unrooted Unweighted Pair Group with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) tree of Streptomyces strains based on 16S rrna amino acid sequences. Unknown isolates of Streptomyces were supported by 16S rrna phylogenetic tree to be different strains from those strains registered in NCBI. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values from 1000 resampled datasets. Bar indicates sequence divergence. Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT) model was used for distance correction. (*) Homologous sequences from GenBank (see Table 1). S. coelicolor M145 was not included in the phylogenetic analysis due to the unavailability of 16S rrna sequence. Nonetheless, gene-based phylogenetic tree was observed to be supported by the highly conserved molecular chronometer, 16S rrna, especially in discriminating unidentified strains. January February 2015 RJPBCS 6(1) Page No. 113

16S rrna phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4, 5 and 6) confirmed that unidentified strains are unique to strains available in the public database. The phylogenetic tree generated using 16S rrna showed a more interesting topology. First, having 0.5% sequence divergence which is the lowest observed among the analyses. Second, there is clearer clustering of unidentified strains as compared to the cels2 gene-based phylogenetic tree. Unidentified isolates, 119.13, 119.103 and 119.104, were also shown to be in the same cluster as observed in the cels2 gene-based phylogeny. Other clustering observed in 16S rrna phylogenetic tree were samples 119.2, 119.83, 1.82, 119.92, 119.64 and 119.5, 119.102, 119.7, 119.120, 119.101, 119.117, 119.123, 119.110, 119.97, 119.100, 1.15, 119.127 and 119.94. These three different clusters formed by unknown and reference strains using 16S rrna were evident as two distinct clusters in cels2 gene-based phylogenetic tree. Streptomyces sp. SirexAA-E and S. flavogriseus were also observed to be consistently grouped in the phylogenetic analyses suggesting a close evolutionary origin between the two species. Design and optimization of polymerase chain reaction parameters to amplify the target gene was successful. Interestingly, cels2 gene has higher sequence divergence as compared to 16S rrna. Having higher sequence divergence than 16S rrna, cels2 gene has a potential to be used as a reference molecular chronometer in future phylogenetic studies on Streptomyces [12]. Apart from having higher sequence divergence, cels2 gene was also observed to be conserved in a number of Streptomyces species. Notably, tree topology of the cels2 gene demonstrated two separate clusters whereas the 16S rrna phylogeny revealed one monophyletic (S. coelicolor A3 (2)-like) and two separate clusters of K. setae-like phylogeny. The congruency of tree topology and species clustering in 16S rrna-based phylogeny and cels2 gene-based phylogeny suggests that cels2 can also be used in intraspecies discrimination within this bacterial group. In present study, we also found out that K. setae KM-6054 to be highly related species to Streptomyces as previously reported [13]. Three different building methods, NJ, ML and UPGMA also showed strong agreement on every analyses made using cels2 gene and 16S rrna. This study reiterates that intraspecies delineation of Streptomyces can be achieved using simultaneous analysis of protein coding genes and 16S rrna. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This research was funded by the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No.: PJ009490), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea. Sincere gratitude is extended to Professor Elsie C. Jimenez of University of the Philippines Baguio for editing the manuscript and to the graduate students of Kookmin University, BioResource Laboratory, Youngseok Ham, Hee-Hoon Ahn, Yoon-Hee Kim and Han-Saem Park, for the technical support they extended during the conduct of the study. REFERENCES [1] Bently SD, et al. Nature 2002; 417:141-147. [2] Kim BJ, et al. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54: 593-598. [3] Guo Y, et al. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58: 149-159. [4] Lingzhu M, et al. J Antibiot 2011; 64: 97-101. [5] William S, et al. Bacterial genomic DNA isolation using CTAB. DOE Joint Genomic Institute 2004. [6] Saitou N, and Nei M, Mol Biol Evol 1987;4: 406-425. [7] Murtagh F, Computational Statistics Quarterly 1984; 101 113. [8] Felsenstein J, PHYLIP (Phylogeny inference package), version 3.5c. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA 13. [9] Chelo IM, Ze-Ze L, Tenreiro R, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57: 276-286. [10] Jones DT, et al. Comput Appl Biosci 12; 8: 275-282. [11] Felsentein J, Evolution, 1985; 39: 783-791. [12] Yanez MA, et al. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53: 875-883. [13] Hsiao N, and Kirby R, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2008; 93: 1-25. January February 2015 RJPBCS 6(1) Page No. 114