Online Appendix for Forecasting the Equity Risk Premium: The Role of Technical Indicators



Similar documents
PRACTICE 1: MUTUAL FUNDS EVALUATION USING MATLAB.

THE METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES THE METHOD OF LEAST SQUARES

THE DISTRIBUTION OF LOAN PORTFOLIO VALUE * Oldrich Alfons Vasicek

Economic Interpretation of Regression. Theory and Applications

Causal, Explanatory Forecasting. Analysis. Regression Analysis. Simple Linear Regression. Which is Independent? Forecasting

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH (PYC 304-C) Lecture 12

CHAPTER 14 MORE ABOUT REGRESSION

Testing Adverse Selection Using Frank Copula Approach in Iran Insurance Markets

SIMPLE LINEAR CORRELATION

Calculation of Sampling Weights

STATISTICAL DATA ANALYSIS IN EXCEL

Forecasting and Stress Testing Credit Card Default using Dynamic Models

Online Appendix Supplemental Material for Market Microstructure Invariance: Empirical Hypotheses

Regression Models for a Binary Response Using EXCEL and JMP

Evaluating credit risk models: A critique and a new proposal

How To Calculate The Accountng Perod Of Nequalty

the Manual on the global data processing and forecasting system (GDPFS) (WMO-No.485; available at

NPAR TESTS. One-Sample Chi-Square Test. Cell Specification. Observed Frequencies 1O i 6. Expected Frequencies 1EXP i 6

World currency options market efficiency

Exhaustive Regression. An Exploration of Regression-Based Data Mining Techniques Using Super Computation

The Cross Section of Foreign Currency Risk Premia and Consumption Growth Risk

Vasicek s Model of Distribution of Losses in a Large, Homogeneous Portfolio

Traffic-light a stress test for life insurance provisions

Prediction of Disability Frequencies in Life Insurance

Can Auto Liability Insurance Purchases Signal Risk Attitude?

How To Find The Dsablty Frequency Of A Clam

Lecture 14: Implementing CAPM

Transition Matrix Models of Consumer Credit Ratings

Macro Factors and Volatility of Treasury Bond Returns

Two Faces of Intra-Industry Information Transfers: Evidence from Management Earnings and Revenue Forecasts

Performance, Stock Selection and Market Timing of the German Equity Mutual Fund Industry

Diagnostic Tests of Cross Section Independence for Nonlinear Panel Data Models

The impact of hard discount control mechanism on the discount volatility of UK closed-end funds

The announcement effect on mean and variance for underwritten and non-underwritten SEOs

Latent Class Regression. Statistics for Psychosocial Research II: Structural Models December 4 and 6, 2006

The Application of Fractional Brownian Motion in Option Pricing

Analysis of Premium Liabilities for Australian Lines of Business

Chapter XX More advanced approaches to the analysis of survey data. Gad Nathan Hebrew University Jerusalem, Israel. Abstract

Measuring portfolio loss using approximation methods

Evidence of the unspanned stochastic volatility in crude-oil market

Marginal Returns to Education For Teachers

CHOLESTEROL REFERENCE METHOD LABORATORY NETWORK. Sample Stability Protocol

Testing for Asymmetric Information in Tunisian Automobile Insurance Market

Variance estimation for the instrumental variables approach to measurement error in generalized linear models

Statistical Methods to Develop Rating Models

How Sets of Coherent Probabilities May Serve as Models for Degrees of Incoherence

Imperial College London

Underwriting Risk. Glenn Meyers. Insurance Services Office, Inc.

Construction Rules for Morningstar Canada Target Dividend Index SM

The OC Curve of Attribute Acceptance Plans

Location Factors for Non-Ferrous Exploration Investments

What is Candidate Sampling

Optimal Bidding Strategies for Generation Companies in a Day-Ahead Electricity Market with Risk Management Taken into Account

Gender differences in revealed risk taking: evidence from mutual fund investors

Pricing Multi-Asset Cross Currency Options

The Investor Recognition Hypothesis:

SUBJECT-LEVEL TREND ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL TRIALS

PERRON FROBENIUS THEOREM

Exchange Rate Uncertainty and International Portfolio Flows

A Model of Private Equity Fund Compensation

Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences ISSN: Vol. 1 No. 2 [ ]

1 De nitions and Censoring

This study examines whether the framing mode (narrow versus broad) influences the stock investment decisions

4 Hypothesis testing in the multiple regression model

An Alternative Way to Measure Private Equity Performance

Scale Dependence of Overconfidence in Stock Market Volatility Forecasts

Measurement of Farm Credit Risk: SUR Model and Simulation Approach

Recurrence. 1 Definitions and main statements

where the coordinates are related to those in the old frame as follows.

THE DETERMINANTS OF THE TUNISIAN BANKING INDUSTRY PROFITABILITY: PANEL EVIDENCE

The timing ability of hybrid funds of funds

HARVARD John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics, and Business

Richard W. Andrews and William C. Birdsall, University of Michigan Richard W. Andrews, Michigan Business School, Ann Arbor, MI

THE efficient market hypothesis (EMH) asserts that financial. Predicting Financial Markets: Comparing Survey, News, Twitter and Search Engine Data

Modeling Loss Given Default in SAS/STAT

Modelling the World Oil Market Assessment of a Quarterly Econometric Model

Portfolio Loss Distribution

CS 2750 Machine Learning. Lecture 3. Density estimation. CS 2750 Machine Learning. Announcements

5 Multiple regression analysis with qualitative information

Approximating Cross-validatory Predictive Evaluation in Bayesian Latent Variables Models with Integrated IS and WAIC

An Evaluation of the Extended Logistic, Simple Logistic, and Gompertz Models for Forecasting Short Lifecycle Products and Services

Survive Then Thrive: Determinants of Success in the Economics Ph.D. Program. Wayne A. Grove Le Moyne College, Economics Department

How To Evaluate A Dia Fund Suffcency

How To Calculate The Prce Of An Ndex Opton

Chapter 3 Research Method

International University of Japan Public Management & Policy Analysis Program

Risk Model of Long-Term Production Scheduling in Open Pit Gold Mining

Estimating Total Claim Size in the Auto Insurance Industry: a Comparison between Tweedie and Zero-Adjusted Inverse Gaussian Distribution

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN QUANTITATIVE COMPARATIVE METHODOLOGY:

Estimation of Dispersion Parameters in GLMs with and without Random Effects

The Relationship between Exchange Rates and Stock Prices: Studied in a Multivariate Model Desislava Dimitrova, The College of Wooster

Survival analysis methods in Insurance Applications in car insurance contracts

Joe Pimbley, unpublished, Yield Curve Calculations

benefit is 2, paid if the policyholder dies within the year, and probability of death within the year is ).

Forecasting the Direction and Strength of Stock Market Movement

7 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)

Wage inequality and returns to schooling in Europe: a semi-parametric approach using EU-SILC data

ADVERSE SELECTION IN INSURANCE MARKETS: POLICYHOLDER EVIDENCE FROM THE U.K. ANNUITY MARKET *

Is There A Tradeoff between Employer-Provided Health Insurance and Wages?

Solution: Let i = 10% and d = 5%. By definition, the respective forces of interest on funds A and B are. i 1 + it. S A (t) = d (1 dt) 2 1. = d 1 dt.

Transcription:

Onlne Appendx for Forecastng the Equty Rsk Premum: The Role of Techncal Indcators Chrstopher J. Neely Federal Reserve Bank of St. Lous neely@stls.frb.org Davd E. Rapach Sant Lous Unversty rapachde@slu.edu Guofu Zhou Washngton Unversty n St. Lous and CEMA zhou@wustl.edu August 20, 2013 Jun Tu Sngapore Management Unversty tujun@smu.edu.sg Ths Onlne Appendx descrbes the wld bootstrap procedure used to compute emprcal p-values n Secton 2 of the paper. It also reports the complete structural stablty test results (Table A1) dscussed n footnote 9 of the paper, as well as the predctve regresson results for SENT (Table A2) and condtonal asset prcng model estmaton results (Table A3) dscussed n Secton 2.4 of the paper. We begn wth the wld bootstrap procedure. Let ˆε t+1 = r t+1 ( ˆα + N =1 ˆβ,x x,t + N =1 ˆβ,S S,t ), (A1) where ˆα, ˆβ,x ( = 1,..., N), and ˆβ,S ( = 1,..., N) are OLS parameter estmates for the general multple predctve regresson model that ncludes a constant and all of the N macroeconomc varables and N techncal ndcators as regressors. Followng conventon, we assume that each macroeconomc varable follows an AR(1) process: x,t+1 = ρ,0 + ρ,1 x,t + v,t+1 for = 1,..., N. (A2) Defne ˆv c,t+1 = x,t+1 ( ˆρ c,0 + ˆρc,1 x,t) for = 1,..., N, (A3) where ˆρ,0 c and ˆρc,1 are reduced-bas estmates of the AR(1) parameters n (A2). The reduced-bas estmates of the AR parameters are computed by teratng on the analytcal second-order bas expresson for the OLS estmates. Based on these AR parameter estmates and ftted resduals, we buld up a pseudo sample of observatons for the equty rsk premum and N macroeconomc varables under the null hypothess of no

return predctablty: r t+1 = r + ˆε t+1 w t+1 for t = 0,...,T 1, (A4) x,t+1 = ˆρ c,0 + ˆρc,1 x,t + ˆvc,t+1 w t+1 for = 1,..., N and t = 0,...,T 1, (A5) where r s the sample mean of the equty rsk premum, w t+1 s a draw from the standard normal dstrbuton, and x,0 = x,0 ( = 1,..., N). Observe that we multply ˆε t+1 n (A4) and each ˆv,t+1 c n (A5) by the same scalar, w t+1, when generatng the month-(t + 1) pseudo resduals, thereby makng t a wld bootstrap. In addton to preservng the contemporaneous correlatons n the data, the wld bootstrap accounts for general forms of condtonal heteroskedastcty. Employng reduced-bas parameter estmates n (A5) helps to ensure that we adequately capture the persstence n the macroeconomc varables. To generate a pseudo sample of observatons for the N techncal ndcators, we assume that each ndcator follows a frst-order, two-state, Markov-swtchng process wth the followng transton matrx: where P = p 0,0 p 1,0 p 0,1 p 1,1 for = 1,..., N, (A6) p j,k = Pr(S,t = k S,t 1 = j) for j, k = 0, 1, (A7) and p 0,0 + p 0,1 = p 1,0 + p 1,1 = 1. Based on estmates of the transton probabltes n (A6) and S,0 ( = 1,..., N), we can buld up a pseudo sample of observatons for the N techncal ndcators va smulatons. Usng the pseudo sample of observatons for the equty rsk premum [{rt+1 }T 1 t=0 ], N macroeconomc varables [{x,t }T 1 t=0 ( = 1,..., N)], and N techncal ndcators [{S,t }T 1 t=0 ( = 1,..., N)], we estmate the slope coeffcents and correspondng heteroskedastcty-robust t-statstcs for the bvarate predctve regressons gven by (1) and (10) n the paper for each, as well as the prncpal component predctve regressons gven by (11), (12), and (13) n the paper. Note that we compute the prncpal components n (11), (12), and (13) usng {x,t }T 1 t=0 and {S,t }T 1 t=0 ( = 1,..., N), so that the pseudo sample accounts for the estmated regressors n the prncpal component predctve regressons. We store the t-statstcs for all of the predctve regressons. Repeatng ths process 2,000 tmes yelds emprcal dstrbutons for each of the t-statstcs. For a gven t-statstc, the emprcal p-value s the proporton of the bootstrapped t-statstcs greater than the t-statstc for the orgnal sample. 2

Table A1 Predctve Regresson Structural Stablty Test Results, 1951:01 2011:12 Predctor qll Predctor qll Model qll DP 9.85 MA(1,9) 10.02 PC-ECON 21.54 DY 10.23 MA(1,12) 7.62 PC-TECH 18.24 EP 10.08 MA(2,9) 7.02 PC-ALL 6.88 DE 7.08 MA(2,12) 6.86 RVOL 11.92 MA(3,9) 7.53 BM 9.88 MA(3,12) 8.05 NTIS 17.88 MOM(9) 8.01 TBL 12.04 MOM(12) 7.50 LTY 9.80 VOL(1,9) 6.26 LTR 8.77 VOL(1,12) 7.30 TMS 13.24 VOL(2,9) 8.57 DFY 13.89 VOL(2,12) 9.29 DFR 8.76 VOL(3,9) 8.63 INFL 14.67 VOL(3,12) 8.75 Notes. The second and fourth columns report the Ellott and Müller (2006) qll statstc for the bvarate predctve regresson model, r t+1 = α + β q,t + ε,t+1, where r t+1 s the log equty rsk premum (n percent) and q,t s one of the 14 macroeconomc varables (14 techncal ndcators) gven n the frst (thrd) column. The last column reports the qll statstc for a predctve regresson model based on prncpal components, r t+1 = α + K β k j + ε t+1, where j s the kth prncpal component extracted from the 14 macroeconomc varables ( j = ECON, PC-ECON), 14 techncal ndcators ( j = TECH, PC-TECH), or the 14 macroeconomc varables and 14 techncal ndcators taken together ( j = ALL, PC-ALL); k = 3 for PC-ECON, k = 1 for PC-TECH, and k = 4 for PC-ALL. The qll statstc s for testng the null hypothess that the ntercept and slope coeffcents are constant. The 10%, 5%, and 1% crtcal values for the qll statstcs n the second and fourth columns and for the PC-TECH model are 12.80, 14.32, and 17.57, respectvely; the 10%, 5%, and 1% crtcal values for the qll statstc for the PC-ECON (PC-ALL) model are 23.37, 25.28, and 29.18 ( 28.55, 30.60, and 35.09), respectvely (where we reject for small values);,, and ndcate sgnfcance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectvely.

Table A2 Predctve Regresson Estmaton Results for the Sentment-Changes Index, 1965:08 to 2010:12 Macroeconomc varables Slope Techncal ndcators Slope Predctor coeffcent R 2 R 2 EXP R 2 REC Predctor coeffcent R 2 R 2 EXP R 2 REC Panel A: Bvarate Predctve Regressons DP 0.12 [0.92] 0.26% 0.38% 0.25% MA(1,9) 0.20 [2.26] 0.94% 0.04% 4.94% DY 0.15 [1.10] 0.37% 0.45% 0.08% MA(1,12) 0.24 [2.48] 1.19% 0.24% 5.07% EP 0.09 [0.83] 0.17% 0.51% 1.25% MA(2,9) 0.16 [1.75] 0.56% 0.11% 3.27% DE 0.02 [0.15] 0.00% 0.05% 0.23% MA(2,12) 0.26 [2.83] 1.47% 0.62% 4.95% RVOL 0.41 [ 0.55] 0.05% 0.16% 0.40% MA(3,9) 0.11 [1.25] 0.28% 0.22% 2.31% BM 0.19 [1.06] 0.27% 0.55% 0.86% MA(3,12) 0.14 [1.50] 0.42% 0.06% 1.87% NTIS 0.27 [ 0.14] 0.00% 0.05% 0.18% MOM(9) 0.19 [2.01] 0.75% 0.35% 2.35% TBL 0.02 [1.13] 0.20% 0.13% 1.56% MOM(12) 0.20 [2.15] 0.84% 0.40% 2.64% LTY 0.02 [1.20] 0.24% 0.25% 0.22% VOL(1,9) 0.17 [1.88] 0.63% 0.02% 3.27% LTR 0.01 [ 0.63] 0.07% 0.04% 0.17% VOL(1,12) 0.18 [1.93] 0.70% 0.14% 2.97% TMS 0.01 [0.23] 0.01% 0.13% 0.57% VOL(2,9) 0.19 [2.10] 0.86% 0.31% 3.07% DFY 0.07 [0.77] 0.12% 0.24% 1.59% VOL(2,12) 0.20 [2.18] 0.92% 0.57% 2.35% DFR 0.04 [ 1.15] 0.30% 0.76% 1.56% VOL(3,9) 0.12 [1.23] 0.31% 0.10% 1.16% INFL 0.05 [0.45] 0.04% 0.08% 0.51% VOL(3,12) 0.15 [1.54] 0.47% 0.19% 1.60% Panel B: Prncpal Component Predctve Regressons 1 ECON 0.01 [0.42] 0.07% 0.00% 0.38% 1 TECH 0.03 [2.31] 0.96% 0.28% 3.72% 2 ECON 0.01 [0.32] 3 ECON 0.01 [0.25] Panel C: Prncpal Component Predctve Regresson, All Predctors Taken Together 1 ALL 0.03 [2.15] 1.11% 0.10% 5.21% 2 ALL 0.02 [0.93] 3 ALL 0.02 [0.61] 4 ALL 0.01 [0.26] Notes. Panel A reports estmaton results for the bvarate predctve regresson model, SENT t+1 = α + β q,t + ε,t+1, where SENT t+1 s the sentment-changes ndex and q,t s one of the 14 macroeconomc varables (14 techncal ndcators) gven n the frst (sxth) column. Panels B and C report estmaton results for a predctve regresson model based on prncpal components, SENT t+1 = α + K β k j + ε t+1, where j s the kth prncpal component extracted from the 14 macroeconomc varables ( j = ECON), 14 techncal ndcators ( j = TECH), or the 14 macroeconomc varables and 14 techncal ndcators taken together ( j = ALL). The brackets to the mmedate rght of the estmated slope coeffcents report heteroskedastcty-consstent t-statstcs;,, and ndcate sgnfcance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectvely, based on one-sded (upper-tal) wld bootstrapped p-values; 0.00 ndcates less than 0.005 n absolute value. The R 2 statstcs n the thrd and eghth columns are computed for the full sample. The REXP 2 (R2 REC ) statstcs n the fourth and nnth (ffth and tenth) columns are computed for NBER-dated busness-cycle expansons (recessons), as gven by (9) n the paper.

Table A3 Tests of Excluson Restrctons for the Condtonal Fama- French Three-Factor Model of Momentum Portfolo Excess Returns, 1951:01 2011:12 Portfolo () α,k = 0 for k = 2, 3, 4;,2 = 0 j; α,1 = 0,,3 = 0 j; α,k = 0 k,,1 = 0 j,4 = 0 j,k = 0 j, k # restrctons 4 12 16 Low 58.96 66.61 128.28 2 72.67 40.72 117.87 3 66.93 39.21 105.83 4 50.71 61.43 118.21 5 10.84 23.77 31.00 6 4.15 50.31 66.02 7 26.70 76.00 111.32 8 58.11 113.34 171.00 9 58.30 74.93 112.46 Hgh 59.87 41.63 109.26 UMD 108.15 62.36 156.86 Notes. The table reports heteroskedastcty-consstent χ 2 -statstcs for tests of parameter restrctons for the condtonal Fama-French three-factor model: R,t+1 R f,t+1 = α,t + β MKT,t MKT t+1 + β,,t SMB SMB t+1 + β,t HML HML t+1 + ε,t+1, where R,t+1 s the (smple) return on momentum portfolo, R f,t+1 s the rskfree return, MKT s the excess market return, SMB (HML) s the sze (value) premum, and α,t = α,0 + 4 α,k ALL,,t =,0 + 4 ALL,k for j = MKT, SMB, HML, where ALL s the kth prncpal component extracted from 14 macroeconomc varables and 14 techncal ndcators taken together. The momentum portfolos are from Kenneth French s Data Lbrary and formed from NYSE pror return decles; UMD s the up-mnus-down portfolo. The χ 2 -statstcs correspond to the excluson restrctons gven n the column headng;,, and ndcate sgnfcance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectvely, based on wld-bootstrapped p-values.