Middleville State Game Area Master Plan

Similar documents
Photo courtesy of the National Wild Turkey Federation NON-GAME GAME

Myre-Big Island State Park

Wildlifer 2013 Managing Wildlife on Private Lands

FWRC. Cooperators: Delta Wildlife, Inc. Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Forest Management Guidelines for the Protection of Four-toed and Spotted Salamander Populations Carol Hall & Bruce Carlson May 2004

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Wausau and Marathon County Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Department Forestry Division 2015 Work Plan

Chapter 11 C. Case Study: Massachusetts Woodlands Cooperative: A New Tool for Landscape Planning and Management

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

How To Manage Your Land

COMPARTMENT REVIEW RECORD OF CHANGES AND DECISIONS. Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Atlanta Management Unit Year-of-Entry

Appendix A: Land Protection Plan

King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Managing Fire Dependent Wildlife Habitat without Fire. A Land Management Practice That: 100 Years of Fire Suppression in Ponderosa pine ecosystems

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Colorado Natural Heritage Program

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

(Seattle, WA, More than 500,001, Green Seattle Partnership)

Integration of Forestry & Wildlife Management

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Biomass Harvest Guidelines

CRP Mid-Contract Management Option: Integrated Wildlife Management (645)

MAINTAINING BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

High Conservation Value Forests 3.1. Old Growth Forests. Management & Monitoring Framework

Fayette County Appraisal District

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

Chapter 1b - Priority Map Development

Protecting Your Forest Asset

Prioritizing Riparian Restoration at the Watershed, Reach and Site Scales. Richard R. Harris University of California, Berkeley Cooperative Extension

Controlling Invasive Plants and Animals in our Community

The Roaches Asset Management Review. Draft Objectives for External Consultation. Fundamental Principles

WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. (NAME of PROPERTY or MANAGED AREA) (TOWN or COUNTY, STATE) (TIME PERIOD; e.g )

Biodiversity Concepts

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HABITAT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM HABITAT ENHANCEMENT AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT FUNDING

Chapter 5. Managing Regenerating and Young Forest Habitat

4. Priority Areas of Conservation

Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Partnership Proposed Demonstration Area A Brief Introduction. Presented by Jeremy Drew Project Manager Resource Concepts, Inc.

Use: Cooperative farming as a habitat management tool to enhance and restore refuge grasslands

File Code: Date: June 24, 2013 Subject: Mulberry River Watershed Improvement and Access Project

Division of Forestry

How To Know If A Forest Service And Bmd Plan Postfire Rehabilitation And Restoration

The LAndscape Management Policy Simulator (LAMPS) Pete Bettinger Department of Forest Resources Oregon State University

Use this diagram of a food web to answer questions 1 through 5.

Wilderness Management and Environmentally Manageable Wildlife Refuge Facilities in Kansas

Species-of-the-Week. Blanding s Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) Species of Special Concern in Michigan

Rabbitat. Gimme shelter. That s exactly what brush. Brush Piles for Wildlife

Non-consumptive use of wildlife. Non-consumptive Use. Non-consumptive Use

Woodlands Management Plan. (Draft June 2011) A. Definition of Woodlands Areas vs. Landscaped Areas of Parkfairfax

Consulting Foresters for Private Landowners

Deciduous Forest. Courtesy of Wayne Herron and Cindy Brady, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service

FactSheet. Extension. Harvesting and Reproduction Methods for Ohio Forests. Nearly eight million acres of Ohio are forested. These forests F-47-01

RainScapes. Runoff/Erosion: RainScapes for Schools Environmental Report Card. Excess runoff will affect these indicators of Bay health:

Guidelines for Degraded Landscape Management (Deliverable #16) September 30, 2013

Daniel Rudi Rudell of Redstart Consulting shares his knowledge of invasive plant management.

6. NATURAL AREAS FIRE MANAGEMENT

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

Florida Division of Forestry

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

Experienced Planning and Design

Decision Memo. Restore Act Land Acquisition

Habitat Requirements of Wildlife: Food, Water, Cover and Space

American Forest Foundation (AFF) Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification

Wildlife Management Notes

Key Idea 2: Ecosystems

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

Mer Bleue Wetland Management Plan: Executive Summary National Capital Commission National Capital Greenbelt Elgin Street Ottawa, Ontario K1P

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

RESTORATION & REVITALIZATION

SITE WEED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. (NAME of PRESERVE or CONSERVATION AREA) (TOWN, STATE) (PERIOD; e.g )

Increasing the Pace of Restoration and Job Creation on Our National Forests

understanding Sustainable Landscaping & Tree Preservation Standards

As stewards of the land, farmers must protect the quality of our environment and conserve the natural resources that sustain it by implementing

2015 Maryland Forest Action Plan Executive Summary

The Conservation Reserve Program: 45th Signup Results

Technical Study and GIS Model for Migratory Deer Range Habitat. Butte County, California

Effects of Climate Change on Grasslands. Jeff Thorpe Saskatchewan Research Council June 27, 2012

San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Restoration Program Design Review Group. Project Summary Outline

The Nature Conservancy Offering Protected Lands for Sale in the Adirondacks Sustainable Forestry to Continue

Region of Georgia : Mountains

Heartwood Forestland Fund IV, LP Highlands Property Executive Summary of the 10-Year Management Plan The Forestland Group, LLC

Management Plan Template For Conservation Easements Held by CPW

THE OFFERING MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW

Invasive Species Jeopardy

Lesson Overview. Biodiversity. Lesson Overview. 6.3 Biodiversity

Integrating Landscape Restoration and CWPP

Madagascar: Makira REDD+

Multiple Species Conservation Program County of San Diego. A Case Study in Environmental Planning & The Economic Value of Open Space

Appendix C. Municipal Planning and Site Restoration Considerations

WORKSHOP SUMMARY REPORT 1

Pennsylvania Energy Impacts Assessment Executive Summary

Piedmont Small Wetland Communities Piedmont Ecoregion

Fighting Fire with Fire: Can Fire Positively Impact an Ecosystem?

LIVING LANDS Helping Land Trusts Conserve Biodiversity

Appendix I: Recreation and Visitor Services Market Analysis for the Kobuk-Seward Peninsula Planning Area

REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS

APPLICATION FOR CLASSIFICATION OF FOREST LAND

Jackson Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 2157) Revised Study Plan 12: Northern Spotted Owl Surveys. Final Technical Report

Transcription:

Middleville State Game Area Master Plan Michigan Department of Natural Resources Michigan DNR Website Wildlife Division Sara Thompson May 2016

Intended Purpose and General Management Direction Acquistion of the land currently designated as the Middleville State Game Area (SGA) (Figure 1) began in the late 1940 s following unsuccessful farming attempts on the hilly slopes of this landscape. The bulk of State acquisition took place in the 1950 s and 1960 s. On April 19, 1965, an 8,030 acre Wildlife Management project boundary was dedicated. Total acreage in State ownership to date is 4,585 acres. Of this, 83% of the acres were purchased with the aid of federal Pitman-Robertson funding, and 17% were purchased with the State Natural Resources Trust Fund (Figure 2). The Middleville SGA is located in the Southwest Region (SWR) of the Lower Peninsula, in the northwest corner of Barry County. It is 15 miles SE of Grand Rapids, 35 miles NE of Kalamazoo, 45 miles SW of Lansing and 150 miles from Chicago. Locally, the Middleville SGA is located 3 miles NE of the Village of Middleville. The Middleville SGA is currently being managed for the following featured wildlife species: cottontail rabbit, eastern wild turkey (wild turkey) white-tailed deer (deer), and squirrels. This management strategy satisfies the original intended purpose of this property for the management of wildlife species and associated wildlife based recreation. Ruffed grouse was previously a featured species for this area, however populations and associated aspen habitat components are dwindling as the overall age of the forest matures and the species composition has moved toward oak dominance types. Therefore, in the next 10 years grouse will likely be scarce on this SGA. Squirrel numbers are plentiful and habitat management to favor requirements for squirrels will become a higher priority on this area in the next 10 years. Management for cottontail rabbit, wild turkey and deer will remain important over the next 10 years. Background The soils in the Middleville SGA are listed as hilly to steep which makes tillage difficult to impossible. Only a small portion of the area, approximately 165 acres, is tillable and these acres are utilized for sharecrop agriculture to provide food for wildlife and attract wildlife to the area for hunting (Figure 3 and Table 1). The majority of the soils are moderately fertile with only a fair to thin layer of topsoil but have a good woodland potential for management. Due to the hilly nature of the landscape and the thin layer of topsoil, erosion is a major concern when considering management options. Access for management is also an issue due to the hilly nature of the landscape and the existence of scattered small wetlands. The landscape surrounding Middleville SGA is dominated by agriculture and rural development. The SGA supports over 3,900 acres of forest including over 750 acres of high-quality forest (as identified by Michigan Natural Features Inventory) that contain numerous wetlands and vernal pools. The area of high quality forest within the game area serves as an important island of biodiversity for the local region, especially for interior-forest obligates and species dependent upon mature forest ecosystems and the

wetlands and vernal pools nested within the forest matrix. When feasible, factors necessary to maintain the biodiversity of this forested area are considered when making management decisions for the featured wildlife species. Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) conducted surveys for high-quality natural communities and rare animal species in the Middleville SGA during 2014. Twenty species of greatest conservation need and six rare animal species have been recorded in the game area. Twenty-two element occurrences (EOs) have been documented in Middleville SGA including seven animal EOs, eight plant EOs, and seven natural community EOs. MNFI published a report of their findings along with management recommendations for these rare species and communities (Natural Features Inventory and Management Recommendations for Middleville State Game Area, 2015) When feasible, MNFI management recommendations for these rarities are considered when making management decisions for the featured wildlife species on the Middleville SGA. At a local level, this plan helps fulfill goals and objectives of other higher level Department and Wildlife Division plans and initiatives. The Department goals (protect natural resources, sustainable recreation, strong natural resource-based economies, and strong relationships and partnerships), the Wildlife Division s Guiding Principles and Strategies (Goal 1 Manage for healthy and sustainable populations of wildlife, Goal 2 Manage habitat for sustainable wildlife populations and wildlife based recreation, Goal 3 Administer and promote effective stewardship of lands for wildlife habitats and wildlife-based recreation, Goal 4 Enhance sustainable wildlife-based recreation use and enjoyment), More Bang For Your Buck concepts (outstanding wild turkey hunting, small game hunting), the Division s Southwest Regional Operational Plan, Southwest Region Habitat Guidance documents, and the Southwest Region Land Management Plan are all reflected in this master plan. Wildlife Species Table lists the featured species and species of greatest conservation need found on the Middleville SGA as well as their predicted vulnerability to future climate change. Habitat requirements for the featured species are the primary emphasis of habitat management on the area while keeping in mind the special requirements of species of greatest conservation need. Many other common wildlife species exist on the game area and are too numerous to mention individually in this plan. Existing Conditions Because the landscape surrounding Middleville SGA is dominated by agriculture and rural development, the large area of forest within the game area serves as an important island of biodiversity for the local region. The conservation significance of these forests is heightened by the documentation of numerous vernal-pools within these forests and

the documentation of forty-nine species of birds of which ten are SGCN and two are DNR featured species. The forest conditions could be improved for these species by management that would dampen the effects of forest fragmentation and promote connectivity of existing wetlands and high-quality natural communities. Much of the land within Middleville SGA historically supported fire-dependent ecosystems, namely dry-mesic southern forest and to a lesser extent oak openings. In the absence of frequent fires, open oak savanna and oak barrens have converted to closed-canopy forests dominated by shade-tolerant native and invasive species. Efforts to restore oak savanna within Middleville SGA would depend on the implementation of frequent prescribed fire, if funding and budgets allow. Invasive species pose a major threat to species diversity and habitat heterogeneity within Middleville SGA. Although numerous invasive species occur within the game area, the species likely to pose the greatest threats because of their ability to invade and quickly dominate intact natural areas include garlic mustard, Japanese barberry, autumn olive, Morrow honeysuckle, multiflora rose, hedge-parsely and tree-of-heaven. Management of invasive species will depend on landscape-scale prescribed fire and spot treatment through cutting and/or herbicide application with prioritization within highquality natural community EO s. Recreational Use The primary recreation activity on the Middleville SGA is hunting with deer and turkey hunting being the most popular. Birdwatching and hiking are other popular recreational activities. Forest Management Division of the DNR oversees a section of approved snowmobile trail that runs through the northern portion of the game area. There are no boat launches in the game area. Some segments of road (Parmalee, Loftus and the dirt portion of Soloman) experience high vehicular traffic for wildlife viewing and keeping these roads in a safe and operable condition remains a challenge. Impacts on the Local Economy The Middleville SGA impacts the local economy by providing income to local farmers through sharecrop agreements and firewood to local residents through quarterly issued firewood permits. Timber sales on the area produce revenue and bring additional business to local eateries and other small businesses. Hunting, wildlife viewing and mushroom picking bring local tourists to the area which also benefits local eateries and gas stations. Management Direction Table 3 outlines the current habitat components and the future desired condition for these components.

Goals, Objectives, and Management Actions Goal 1 Provide winter food for deer and turkey. Objective 1. To maintain the 163 acres of open fields in rowcrop agriculture covertype. Action 1 Utilize sharecrop farmers to plant rowcrop rotations in open fields. Action 2 Utilize Barry SGA Headquarters staff to plant food plots if sharecrop farmer is not able to follow-thru with contract. Objective 2 To maintain aspen and oak species as a primary component of the forest. Action 1 Manage aspen, beech and oak for long term sustainability using timber harvest, prescribed fire and planting as needed. Action 2 Maintain scattered mature trees that will continue to produce hard mast (beech, oak) when harvesting timber. Action 3 Use herbicide and prescribed burning to control invasive and undesirable species. Goal 2 Provide grassy openings for rabbit habitat and turkey brooding areas. Objective 1 Maintain 17 acres of warm season grass plantings and 124 acres of cool season grassy/brushy openings. Action 1 Keep openings in a 5-7 year mowing rotation. Action 2 Use large mechanical equipment to remove woody vegetation that becomes too large for brush hog mower. Action 3 Use herbicide and prescribed burning to control invasive and undesirable species. Action 4 Replant openings to a grass/legume mixture as needed to maintain viable grass component for forage and insect attraction. Goal 3 Provide the appropriate level of road access to accommodate hunters and wildlife habitat maintenance activities. Objective 1 Develop a road access plan for the Middleville SGA that outlines the Future Desired Condition for each road segment currently in the game area, and implement the plan. Action 1 Identify essential segments of access roads and work with Barry County Road Commission to determine who has jurisdiction over those segments. Action 2 Provide an opportunity for public input as part of the road access plan. Action 2 Secure funding to repair roads to FDC outlined in plan.

Action 3 Secure funding to perform required maintenance to keep roads in the condition desired for each segment. Goal 4 Maintain closed canopy forest land cover and existing high-quality natural communities (approximately 800 acres) while promoting regeneration for longterm sustainability. Objective 1 Minimize forest fragmentation in the vicinity of existing wetlands and high-quality natural communities. Action 1 - Utilize existing roads and openings for habitat work projects whenever feasible. Action 2 - Identify and map vernal pools utilizing contracted assistance from Michigan Natural Features Inventory. Action 3 Do not disturb any vernal pool depression and establish a 30 yards protective buffer around identified vernal pools. Action 4 - Limit the use of heavy equipment within 30 yards of a vernal pool and maintain at least 70% canopy closure within the 30 yard buffer. Action 5 Avoid the construction of roads and landings and applications of chemicals within the 30 yard buffer around vernal pools. Objective 2 -When feasible, consider recommendations for management as outlined in the document Natural Features Inventory and Management Recommendations for Middleville State Game Area (2015) to protect highquality natural communities and associated species. Action 1 Maximize forest connectivity between forest EO s. Action 2 Encourage forest regeneration by conducting canopy tree removal in small patches to mimic natural disturbance patterns. Action 3 Utilize prescribed fire to mimic natural disturbance and encourage regeneration of desirable tree species. Action 4 Control invasive species as needed to promote regeneration of desired species. Remove newly established invasive species as rapidly as possible before they infest additional areas. Action 5 Consider habitat needs for Cerulean Warbler (and other species of greatest conservation need identified in WAP) when making management decisions. Tables and Maps Tables and Figures can be found at the end of the plan. Acquisition and Disposal of Land The strategy for land acquisition for the Middleville SGA is to purchase inholdings when possible, but not expand outward from the existing footprint. Connecting existing parcels by purchasing inholdings assists with management efficiency and removes potential trespass issues.

Public Input This plan will be available for public review and comment on the DNR website between July 1, 2016 and July 31, 2016. Changes will be made, as necessary, based on public feedback. Once the plan is approved it will be placed on the DNR website, and will be reviewed again within 10 years of the approved date. Send comments to: Sara Thompson ThompsonS23@michigan.gov

Figure 1: Middleville State Game Area Map.

Figure 2. Land acquisition of parcels for the Middleville SGA.

Figure 3 : Covertype map of the Middleville State Game Area.

Table 1: Covertype Summary of Middleville State Game Area (according to MiFi data) CoverType Acres % (of total acres) Mixed Upland Deciduous 1,718.6 37.8 Oak 963.6 21.2 Northern Hardwood 608.7 13.4 Aspen 329.8 7.3 Lowland Deciduous 163.2 3.6 Cropland 162.8 3.6 Upland Shrub 134.0 2.9 Herbaceous Openland 110.7 2.4 Marsh 82.9 1.8 Lowland Shrub 70.2 1.5 Red Pine 65.7 1.4 Low-Density Trees 42.3 0.9 Water 36.9 0.8 Natural Mixed Pines 18.1 0.4 Lowland Aspen/Balsam Poplar 16.8 0.4 Upland Conifers 9.7 0.2 Planted Mixed Pines 6.4 0.1 Bog 4.2 0.1 Upland Spruce/Fir 1.3 0.0 TOTAL ACRES 4,585

Table 2: Featured species and T&E species being considered on the Middleville State Game Area. Common Name Scientific Name State Status Climate Change Vulnerability Cooper;s hawk Accipiter cooperii SGCN Stable Cerulean warbler Setophaga cerulean T, SGCN medium Hooded warbler Setophaga citrina SC, SGCN Stable Yellow-billed Coccyzus americanus SGCN Increase likely cuckoo Northern flicker Colaptes auratus SGCN stable Red-shouldered SGCN Stable hawk Acadian flycatcher Empidonax virescens SGCN Increase likely Wood thrush Hylocichla mustelina SGCN Increase likely Eastern towhee Pipilo erythropthalmus SGCN Increase likely Purple martin Progne subis SGCN Stable Field sparrow Spizella pusilla SGCN Increase likely Blue-winged Vermivora cyanoptera SGCN Increase likely warbler Pileated Dryocopus pileatus Featured Stable woodpecker Species Eastern wild turkey Meleagris gallopavo Featured Species Increase likely White-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus Featured Stable Species Cottontail rabbit Sylvilagus floridanus Featured Species Stable Eastern gray Featured Species stable squirrel Eastern fox squirrel Featured Species stable Blue-spotted Ambystoma laterale SGCN extremely salamander Spotted Ambystoma maculatum SGCN high salamander Eastern tiger Ambystoma tigrinum SGCN salamander Blanding s turtle Emydoidea blandingii SC, SGCN high Eastern box turtle Terrapene Carolina SC, SGCN high Carolina Western chorus frog Psudacris triseriata SGCN medium

Table 3. Habitat types on the Middleville SGA and future desired condition. Habitat Component Closed Canopy Forest Early Successional Forest MiFi Designations Mixed Upland Deciduous Oak Northern Hardwood Lowland Deciduous Red Pine Upland Spruce/Fir Natural Mixed Pines Upland Conifers Planted Mixed Pines Aspen Lowland Aspen/Balsam Poplar Current Future Desired Acres Condition 3555 Slight increase 347 Slight decrease Savanna Some oak types Slight decrease Wetlands Bog Water Marsh 124 Maintain (acreage for vernal ponds not identified in this number) Large Grass 0 Maintain Grasslands Cropland Cropland 163 Maintain Grass/Shrub open lands 247 Maintain Upland Shrub Lowland Shrub Low-Density Trees