Uncertainty Estimation of Target System Multiplication Factors with the new COMMARA Covariance Matrix



Similar documents
Evaluation of Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor Neutronic Benchmarks

MODERN ATOMIC THEORY AND THE PERIODIC TABLE

B I N G O B I N G O. Hf Cd Na Nb Lr. I Fl Fr Mo Si. Ho Bi Ce Eu Ac. Md Co P Pa Tc. Uut Rh K N. Sb At Md H. Bh Cm H Bi Es. Mo Uus Lu P F.

Chem 115 POGIL Worksheet - Week 4 Moles & Stoichiometry Answers

Chem 115 POGIL Worksheet - Week 4 Moles & Stoichiometry

THORIUM UTILIZATION FOR SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY OF NUCLEAR ENERGY S. BANERJEE DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY

Generation IV Fast Reactors. Dr Richard Stainsby AMEC

Electron Configurations, Isoelectronic Elements, & Ionization Reactions. Chemistry 11

EXPERIMENT 4 The Periodic Table - Atoms and Elements

THE COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE FOR THE ALLOY FUEL AND THE INTER-METALLIC DISPERSION FUEL BY THE MACSIS-H AND THE DIMAC

Sampling and preparation of heterogeneous waste fuels?

Technical Challenges for Conversion of U.S. High-Performance Research Reactors (USHPRR)

Ionizing Radiation, Czech Republic, CMI (Czech Metrology Institute)

Electronegativity and Polarity

Current Engineering and Design Activities at Los Alamos National Laboratory Supporting Commercial U.S. Production of 99Mo without the Use of HEU

Chapter NP-5. Nuclear Physics. Nuclear Reactions TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES 1.0 NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2.0 NEUTRON INTERACTIONS

Introduction to Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Advanced Nuclear Fuels

WASTE STREAM 2F35 Excellox-Type Transport Flasks and French-Design Dry Flasks

DOE FUNDAMENTALS HANDBOOK

V K Raina. Reactor Group, BARC

Nuclear ZPE Tapping. Horace Heffner May 2007

Part B 2. Allow a total of 15 credits for this part. The student must answer all questions in this part.

All answers must use the correct number of significant figures, and must show units!

Progress status of the FUTURIX-FTA PIE programme for pins CEA-7 & CEA-8. F. Delage, G. Cécilia, J. Lamontagne, L. Loubet

CRITICALITY ACCIDENT ALARM SYSTEM MODELING WITH SCALE

How To Understand The Sensitivity Of A Nuclear Fuel Cask

Dynamic Load Balancing of Parallel Monte Carlo Transport Calculations

Steven M. Ho!and. Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA

The Future of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

IRPhEP Database and Analysis Tool (IDAT)

From Quantum to Matter 2006

Waste Management 04 Conference, February 29 - March 4, 2004, Tucson, AZ Copyright WM Symposia, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted with permission.

ELECTRON CONFIGURATION (SHORT FORM) # of electrons in the subshell. valence electrons Valence electrons have the largest value for "n"!

Flow distribution and turbulent heat transfer in a hexagonal rod bundle experiment

Conservative approach for PWR MOX Burnup Credit implementation

Copyrighted by Gabriel Tang B.Ed., B.Sc.

CLASS TEST GRADE 11. PHYSICAL SCIENCES: CHEMISTRY Test 6: Chemical change

Self-adjusting Importances for the Acceleration of MCBEND

ACMSM - Computer Applications in Solids Mechanics

The Physics of Energy sources Nuclear Reactor Practicalities

TEPZZ 69 _ZA T EP A2 (19) (11) EP A2. (12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION published in accordance with Art.

EXPERIMENT 8: Activity Series (Single Displacement Reactions)

B) atomic number C) both the solid and the liquid phase D) Au C) Sn, Si, C A) metal C) O, S, Se C) In D) tin D) methane D) bismuth B) Group 2 metal

4.3 Results Drained Conditions Undrained Conditions References Data Files Undrained Analysis of

Methods for the preparation of the test sample from the laboratory sample (Part 1 Material & Methods) Work Package 6 Task 6.4

Candidate Style Answer

DOE s Fuel Cycle Technologies Program - An Overview

Objectives 404 CHAPTER 9 RADIATION

Natural Convection. Buoyancy force

List of Papers. This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals.

Analyses on copper samples from Micans

Retrieval of Damaged Components form Experimental Fast Reactor Joyo Reactor Vessel

Sensitivity- and Uncertainty-Based Criticality Safety Validation Techniques

Name Electrochemical Cells Practice Exam Date:

8. Relax and do well.

University of Missouri and MU Research Reactor Center

CHAPTER 21 ELECTROCHEMISTRY

6.5 Periodic Variations in Element Properties

BWR Description Jacopo Buongiorno Associate Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering

Chapter 8 - Chemical Equations and Reactions

Sample Analysis Design Isotope Dilution

Chapter 8 Atomic Electronic Configurations and Periodicity

2. John Dalton did his research work in which of the following countries? a. France b. Greece c. Russia d. England

1. In the general symbol cleus, which of the three letters. 2. What is the mass number of an alpha particle?

CAD-BASED DESIGN PROCESS FOR FATIGUE ANALYSIS, RELIABILITY- ANALYSIS, AND DESIGN OPTIMIZATION

PWR circuit contamination assessment tool. Use of OSCAR code for engineering studies at EDF

Chapter NP-1. Nuclear Physics. Atomic Nature of Matter TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES 1.0 PROPERTIES OF SUBSTANCES

ACS Algorithm in Discrete Ordinates for Pressure Vessel Dosimetry

Electrons in Atoms & Periodic Table Chapter 13 & 14 Assignment & Problem Set

WASTE STREAM 2Y51 Analytical Services Process Facilities - North Labs

A.17. OXIDIZING PROPERTIES (SOLIDS)

Qualitätsmanagement-Handbuch

REVIEW QUESTIONS Chapter 8

Nuclear Science and Technology Division (94) Multigroup Cross Section and Cross Section Covariance Data Visualization with Javapeño

Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Design and Structural Assessment

3. What would you predict for the intensity and binding energy for the 3p orbital for that of sulfur?

Atomic and Nuclear Physics Laboratory (Physics 4780)

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SCHOOL BUS TRANSPORTATION POLICIES

Electrochemistry - ANSWERS

A Low Cost Chemical Remediation Technology for Heavy Metals in Shipyard Stormwater. SBIR Topic N06 133

The objective of this chapter is to provide criteria with which to assess the safety of

Portable X-ray fluorescence Spectroscopy. Michael A. Wilson Research Soil Scientist USDA-NRCS National Soil Survey Center Lincoln, NE

Effect of Gamma Ray Energies and Addition of Iron Slag by weight to Portland Cements on Mass Attenuation Coefficient

Rosatom Standard Reference Data System

Network Analysis of Nuclear Databases

100% ionic compounds do not exist but predominantly ionic compounds are formed when metals combine with non-metals.

Benchmark on Deterministic Transport Calculations Without Spatial Homogenisation

CVD SILICON CARBIDE. CVD SILICON CARBIDE s attributes include:

Chapter 8: Chemical Equations and Reactions

Nuclear Forensics and the requirement of Certified Reference Materials. SSA Jeff Leggitt, FBI Laboratory Quantico, Virginia

ORTEC DET-SW-UPG. Latest Software Features. Ease of Use. Source Location with the Detective V3 Software

Numerical Investigation of Angle and Geometric of L-Shape Groin on the Flow and Erosion Regime at River Bends

NEUTRON CROSS SECTIONS

Transcription:

Uncertainty Estimation of arget ystem Multiplication Factors with the new COMMARA Covariance Matrix Gerardo Aliberti, Won i Yang, and R. D. McKnight Nuclear Engineering Division Argonne National Laboratory WPEC ubgroup 33 Meeting OECD/NEA Paris May 11, 011

Introduction Uncertainty estimation was performed for eff values of the target systems selected for the ubgroup-33 activities using the recent COMMARA covariance matrix. he COMMARA (Covariance Multigroup Matrix for Advanced Reactor Application) covariance matrix was delivered by BNL and LANL on April 1st, 011, following a series of revision/corrections made on the AFCI data that were initially used for uncertainty estimation of fast reactor parameters. he target systems selected for the cross section adjustment to be performed within ubgroup 33 are: FBR ABR OXIDE ARUP CORE ABR MEAL ABR OXIDE RECYCLED CORE

New Evaluated Covariance Matrices Versions Release Date Isotope/Reaction updated with respect to the previous version AFCI-1.0 November 008 - AFCI-1.1 May 009 Pu39 (only ν), Fe56, Cr50, Ni58, C, O, Na3, B10, Zr90, Mn55 AFCI-1. August 009 AFCI-1.3 April 010 U35 capture, Pu39 ν and structural materials (Cr, Fe, Ni, Pb, Bi); 14 Minor Actinides were updated by Maslov review; Missing correlation matrices were recovered. U33, U34, U35, U36, U38, Np37, Pu38, Pu39, Pu40, Pu41, Pu4, Am43, Cm4, Cm44, Fe54, Fe56, Cr5, Ni58, Na3, Mn55 AFCI-.0 first release October 010 New evaluation AFCI-.0 second release January 011 COMMARA April 011 Pu41 Fission h3, Pu38, Pu40, Pu41, Am41, Am4m, Am43, Cm4, Fe54, Fe56, Cr50, Ni58, Ni60, O16, Pb08, Mg6 and Gd155

Pu41 Fission Relative tandard Deviations (%) Gr. Energy [MeV] AFCI-1. AFCI-1.3 AFCI-.0 f.r. AFCI-.0 s.r. COMMARA 1 1.964E+1 10.00 0.8 10.00 0.65 1.46 1.000E+1 6.45 0.71 6.45 0.50 1.37 3 6.065E+0 5.00 0.67 5.00 0.45 1.39 4 3.679E+0 5.00 0.66 5.00 0.43 1.4 5.31E+0 5.00 0.65 5.00 0.4 1.38 6 1.353E+0 15.00 0.67 15.00 0.44 1.38 7 8.09E-1 16.4 0.68 16.4 0.46 1.7 8 4.979E-1 17.01 0.74 17.01 0.55 1.33 9 3.00E-1 18.88 0.81 18.88 0.64 1.1 10 1.83E-1 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.63 1.07 11 1.111E-1 16.89 0.84 16.89 0.68 1.11 1 6.738E- 14.99 0.85 14.99 0.69 1.7 13 4.087E- 11.88 0.98 11.88 0.85 1.45 14.479E- 10.00 1.5 10.00 1.14 1.59 15 1.503E- 10.00 1.78 10.00 1.71.15 16 9.119E-3 10.00 1.78 10.00 1.71 1.97 17 5.531E-3 10.00.07 10.00.01.0 18 3.355E-3 10.00. 10.00.17.46 19.035E-3 9.97.07 9.97.01.47 0 1.34E-3 7.45 1.04 7.45 1.14 1.47 1 7.485E-4 5.93 5.93 5.93 5.93 1.50 4.540E-4 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.50 3 3.043E-4 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.50 4 1.486E-4 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.50 5 9.166E-5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.50 6 6.790E-5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.50 7 4.017E-5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.50 8.60E-5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.50 9 1.371E-5 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.50 30 8.315E-6 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.50 31 4.000E-6 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 1.50 3 5.400E-7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 33 1.000E-7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50

arget ystems elected for the ubgroup-33 Activities RZ Model of the FBR Reactor

arget ystems elected for the ubgroup-33 Activities R 8.53 cm (econdary control) R 47.50 cm (Inner core) R 51.89 cm (Mixture of primary and secondary) R 96.13 cm (Middle core) R 100.57 cm (Primary control) R 10.34 cm (Outer core) R 150.34 cm (Reflector) R 166.07 cm (hield) R 176.04 cm (Barrel) R 8.53 cm (econdary control) R 47.50 cm (Inner core #1) R 51.89 cm (Mixture of primary and secondary) R 78.65 cm (Inner core #) R 84.01 cm (Primary control) R 10.34 cm (Outer core) R 150.34 cm (Reflector) R 166.07 cm (hield) R 176.04 cm (Barrel) hield Reflector Outer core Middle core Upper structure Gas plenum Inner core Lower reflector Grid plate Lower tructure.99 cm 5.44 cm 44.70 cm 69.13 cm 119.97 cm 119.97 cm 15.4 cm 35.76 cm Absorber Follower 84.49 cm 87.9 cm Absorber 97.15 cm 114.94 cm 17.41 cm Gas plenum Core Upper structure Lower reflector hield Reflector Outer core Inner core Gas plenum Upper structure Lower reflector Grid plate Lower tructure 15.4 cm 17.16 cm 38.40 cm 35.76 cm 91.81 cm 86.77 cm 86.76 cm 11.39 cm Absorber Follower 64.9 cm 60.88 cm Absorber 0.06 cm 105.10 cm 109.9 cm 85.8 cm Lower reflector Core Gas plenum Upper structure Displaced bond Na econdary control Primary control Driver assembly RZ Model of 1000 MWt ABR Oxide Core econdary control Primary control Driver assembly RZ Model of 1000 MWt ABR Metal Core

Computational ools ensitivity analysis for the target systems is still under way and calculations are performed with the following deterministic codes: 1)ENDF\B-VII - MC - - VARI3D (diffusion theory); )ENDF\B-VII - ECCO - ERANO. (transport 4 P 1 ). he uncertainty estimation up to now has been performed for FBR, using sensitivities obtained with both VARI3D and ERANO., and for the ABRs Oxide tartup and Metal Cores using sensitivities obtained with VARI3D only. Results for ABRs Oxide tartup and Metal Cores using ERANO and for ABR Recycled core will be available in the coming months. N sensitivity analysis for all experiments selected for the ubgroup-33 studies has been already performed using both VARI-3D and ERANO codes.

Adopted Meshes for the patial Calculations FBR R-axis Z-axis Point 1 6 5 8 39 48 51 63 73 88 96 Dimension [cm] 0.0000 8.4374 46.977 51.34 73.5550 90.4796 95.086 118.114 137.3450 166.5650 181.750 mesh width 1.6875.084 1.4484.011 1.8805 1.5343 1.9199 1.94 1.9480 1.8388 Point 1 4 4 9 110 133 Dimension [cm] 0.0000 45.0000 80.0000 180.0000 15.0000 60.0000 mesh width 1.9565 1.9444.0000 1.9444 1.9565 ABR Oxide Core R-axis Z-axis Point 1 6 6 9 5 55 65 80 88 93 Dimension [cm] 0.00 8.53 47.50 51.89 96.13 100.57 10.34 150.34 166.07 176.04 mesh width 1.71 1.95 1.46 1.9 1.48 1.98.00 1.97 1.99 Point 1 19 7 6 76 88 100 105 11 117 14 136 178 196 45 Dimension [cm] 0.00 35.76 51.00 10.13 148.15 171.14 194.13 04.6 17.11 7.61 40.10 63.09 347.58 383.06 435.50 480.0 mesh width 1.99 1.91 1.98.00 1.9 1.9.10 1.78.10 1.78 1.9.01 1.97.0 1.94 ABR Metal Core Point 1 6 6 9 43 46 64 79 87 9 R-axis Z-axis Dimension [cm] 0.00 8.53 47.50 51.89 78.65 84.01 10.34 150.34 166.07 176.04 mesh width 1.71 1.95 1.46 1.91 1.79.0.00 1.97 1.99 Point 1 19 7 73 8 91 100 106 109 115 118 17 137 160 171 190 47 Dimension [cm] 0.00 35.76 51.00 14.81 160.9 178.08 195.5 07.10 1.41 4.6 9.58 46.74 66.80 311.0 333.50 371.90 484.9 mesh width 1.99 1.91.00.01 1.91 1.91 1.98 1.77 1.98 1.77 1.91.01 1.9.04.0 1.97

Multiplication Factor Calculated Values for the arget ystems of ubgroup-33 Parameters ANL DIF3D Diffusion ANL ERANO 4 P 1 (a) Not Available yet FBR ABR Oxide Core tartup ABR Oxide Core Recycled ABR Metal Core 1.0545 1.04164 1.00597 - (a) 1.05408 - - -

Different way to present uncertainty contributions he COMMARA data include only partial correlation data of two different reactions of the same isotope. hus, the variation of the parameter R due to the cross section uncertainties of the isotope i can be written as: where is the sensitivity vector of cross section, V is the covariance matrix associated with the cross section, V l is the covariance matrix of cross sections and l. Uncertainty contributions of the single isotope cross sections will be presented as: For the contribution of two correlated cross sections, the following correlation is given: l l l l i V V R R l l l l l l i V V V R R, i V R R,

Different way to present uncertainty contributions Numerical example: case of FBR multiplication factor with COMMARA data Using VARI3D sensitivities: u V Void 1 U 8_ el VU 8_ el U 8_ el U 8_ el 0.08% u V Void U 8_ inel VU 8_ inel U 8_ inel U 8_ inel 0.74% Void u1 V U 8_ el _ inel U 8_ el V U 8_ el U 8_ el V U 8_ el U 8_ el _ inel U 8_ inel U 8_ inel V U 8_ inel U 8_ inel 91.97% he uncertainty on void worth due to U8 elastic and U8 inelastic combined together would be: u1 u1 u1u1 u 0.0008 0.0074 0.91970.00080.0074 0.81%

Major ingle and wo Correlated Cross ection Contributions (%) to the eff otal Uncertainty of FBR Estimated with the COMMARA Matrix FBR VARI3D ERANO Major ingle Cross ection Uncertainties (%) U38 Fission 0.04 0.04 U38 Nu 0.13 0.14 U38 Capture 0.30 0.3 U38 Elastic 0.08 0.04 U38 Inelastic 0.74 0.77 Pu39 Fission 0.17 0.18 Pu39 Nu 0.05 0.06 Pu39 Capture 0.3 0.4 Pu39 Inelastic 0.07 0.07 Pu40 Fission 0.10 0.10 Pu40 Nu 0.18 0.19 Pu40 Capture 0.1 0.13 Pu40 Inelastic 0.04 0.04 Pu41 Fission 0.08 0.08 Pu41 Nu 0.04 0.04 Pu41 Capture 0.10 0.10 Pu4 Fission 0.03 0.04 Pu4 Capture 0.09 0.09 Fe56 Capture 0.08 0.09 Fe56 Elastic 0.06 0.04 Fe56 Inelastic 0.10 0.10 Ni58 Capture 0.03 0.08 Na Inelastic 0.07 0.08 O Capture 0.00 0.13 O Elastic 0.05 0.05 Major wo Correlated Cross ection Uncertainty Contribution Coefficients (%) U38 Inelastic Elastic 91.97 75.50 otal Uncertainty 0.99 1.01

Major ingle and wo Correlated Cross ection Contributions (%) to the eff otal Uncertainty of ABR Oxide tartup Estimated with the COMMARA Matrix ABR OXIDE ARUP VARI3D Major ingle Cross ectionmuncertainties (%) U38 Fission 0.03 U38 Nu 0.1 U38 Capture 0.8 U38 Elastic 0.06 U38 Inelastic 0.55 Pu39 Fission 0.3 Pu39 Nu 0.07 Pu39 Capture 0.31 Pu39 Inelastic 0.07 Pu40 Fission 0.05 Pu40 Nu 0.08 Pu40 Capture 0.06 Fe54 Capture 0.0 Fe54 Elastic 0.03 Fe56 Capture 0.16 Fe56 Elastic 0.9 Fe56 Inelastic 0.15 Cr5 Elastic 0.06 Na Elastic 0.04 Na Inelastic 0.07 O Elastic 0.03 Major wo Correlated Cross ection Uncertainty Contribution Coefficients (%) U38 Inelastic Elastic 88.15 Pu39 Capture Fission -1.05 Pu39 Inelastic Elastic 89.55 Fe56 Inelastic Elastic 7.17 otal Uncertainty 0.88

Major ingle and wo Correlated Cross ection Contributions (%) to the eff otal Uncertainty of ABR Metal Estimated with the COMMARA Matrix ABR MEAL VARI3D Major ingle Cross ection Uncertainties (%) U38 Fission 0.04 U38 Nu 0.15 U38 Capture 0. U38 Elastic 0.09 U38 Inelastic 0.74 Pu39 Fission 0.5 Pu39 Nu 0.08 Pu39 Capture 0.3 Pu39 Elastic 0.0 Pu39 Inelastic 0.09 Pu40 Fission 0.04 Pu40 Nu 0.07 Pu40 Capture 0.03 Fe54 Capture 0.0 Fe54 Elastic 0.04 Fe56 Capture 0.15 Fe56 Elastic 0.47 Fe56 Inelastic 0.16 Cr5 Capture 0.0 Cr5 Elastic 0.11 Cr5 Inelastic 0.0 Na Elastic 0.06 Na Inelastic 0.07 Zr90 Capture 0.0 Zr90 Elastic 0.0 Zr9 Capture 0.0 Major wo Correlated Cross ection Uncertainty Contribution Coefficients (%) U38 Inelastic Elastic 86.30 Pu39 Inelastic Elastic 91.33 Fe56 Inelastic Elastic 6.93 otal Uncertainty 1.09