Governance Model: Issue Escalation and Resolution Framework



Similar documents
Project Start Up. Start-Up Check List. Why a Project Check List? What is a Project Check List? Initial Release 1.0 Date: January 1997

Project Implementation Process (PIP)

U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Aid

EDISON RFP Attachment 3 Existing Issues Management Plan.docx

Organization. Project Name. Project Overview Plan Version # Date

Project Governance Plan Next Generation Project Oregon Military Department, Office of Emergency Management, Program (The OEM 9-1-1)

IndigoBlue Governance Framework

COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS, COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (C4&IT) INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT POLICY

Draft Document STATE OF MICHIGAN. SACWIS Planning Department of Human Services Strategic Implementation Plan: Project Staffing

Project Audit & Review Checklist. The following provides a detailed checklist to assist the PPO with reviewing the health of a project:

SLCM Framework (Version ) Roles and Responsibilities As of January 21, 2005

IT Risk & Security Specialist Position Description

Why are PMO s are Needed on Large Projects?

ITS Project Management

Attachment E. RFP Requirements: Mandatory Requirements: Vendor must respond with Yes or No. A No response will render the vendor nonresponsive.

IT Service Provider and Consumer Support Engineer Position Description

Final. North Carolina Procurement Transformation. Governance Model March 11, 2011

Voice Over IP Network Solution Design, Testing, Integration and Implementation Program Overview

DIRECTIVE NUMBER: v2.0. SUBJECT: Correctional Integration Systems Change Management Plan

DTCC RISK COMMITTEE CHARTER

Health Care Insurance Ltd Complaints Handling Policy

Appeals Case Management System Project. Scope Management Plan. November 20, 2014

U.S. Department of Education Federal Student Aid

Business Analyst Position Description

Configuration Management Plan

EDMS Project Outcome Realisation Plan

1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL John Zoglin, Chair 4:00 4:01. John Zoglin, Chair 4:01 4:02 2. POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES

BC / DR Implementation Tying Disaster Recovery Investment to Measurable Business Value

Project Team Roles Adapted for PAAMCO

FINANCIAL ASSESSMENT CRITERIA (The Assessment Criteria should be read in conjunction with OSFI s Supervisory Framework)

MNLARS Project Audit Checklist

Halifax County Public Schools. Business and Operations Administrator/Supervisor Evaluation and Final Evaluation Report

New Hampshire HMIS Governance Model

ITIL: What is it? How does ITIL link to COBIT and ISO 17799?

Model Template for 165(d) Tailored Resolution Plan

Understand why, when and how-to to formally close a project

Service Management is a journey Who s got the map? Simon King BMC Software

Project Charter Updated

Business Intelligence Analyst Position Description

Project Charter. Secure Message System Upgrade

LGS Project Management Methodology

MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERS. Update on the Financial Management Line of Business and the Financial Systems Integration Office

UNION-MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION COMMITTEES

Joint Operations Steering Committee Charter

MICHIGAN AUDIT REPORT OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL. Doug A. Ringler, C.P.A., C.I.A. AUDITOR GENERAL ENTERPRISE DATA WAREHOUSE

Information Technology Governance Overview and Charter

Guidance on the Governance and Management of Evaluations of Horizontal Initiatives

Human Services Quality Framework. User Guide

EMR ASM Alliance Executive Group: Terms of Reference

2016 CHAPTER OFFICERS & COMMITTEE ROLES

pavassure Resolve Service desk Onsite diagnosis and recovery Enhanced hours support Monitor Event monitoring & alerting Reporting Services

Business Logistics Specialist Position Description

ACADEMIC POLICY FRAMEWORK

MEASURING FOR PROBLEM MANAGEMENT

COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT PLAN <PROJECT NAME>

Peer Review Process Description

Project Lifecycle Management (PLM)

Virginia Longitudinal Data System

Template K Implementation Requirements Instructions for RFP Response RFP #

Project Management Methodology

IT Project Management Methodology. Project Execution Support Guide. Version 0.3

TRANSITION PLAN TEMPLATE

Programme Governance and Management Plan Version 2

White Paper. PPP Governance

Connecticut s P20 WIN Data Governance Manual

Marie-Claire Rickard, GCP & Governance Manager Rachel Fay, GCP & Governance Manager Elizabeth Clough, R&D Operations Manager

Issue Management Plan Preparation Guidelines

Risk/Issue Management Plan

Vermont School Counselor Association By-Laws

quality of service Screenshots

The joint EU Telematics governance model

ITSM Roles. 1.0 Overview

Section 6. Governance & Investment Roadmap. Executive Governance

PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN <PROJECT NAME>

Checklist for a Coordination Agreement for Coordinated Calls (Option 2)

Summit Platform. IT and Business Challenges. SUMMUS IT Management Solutions. IT Service Management (ITSM) Datasheet. Key Benefits

Re: CAPSA Pension Plan Governance Guidelines and Self-Assessment Questionnaire

VICTORIAN CARDIAC OUTCOMES REGISTRY. Data Management Policy

Services Providers. Ivan Soto

Peer Review Process Description

Introduction Purpose... 4 Scope... 4 Manitoba ehealth Change Management... 4 Icons RFC Procedures... 5

Revised May Corporate Governance Guideline

CONTRACT MANAGEMENT POLICY

CIOP CHAPTER Common Operating Environment (COE) Services Management Policy TABLE OF CONTENTS. Section Purpose

IT Project Governance Manual Version 1.1

Transcription:

Governance Model: Issue Escalation and Resolution Framework Project Team Approved: 0/02/2007

Issue Escalation and Resolution Framework Q & A What is an Issue? An issue is a point of system function, feature, design or process that the Technical Steering has not resolved or that is determined to be out of jurisdiction for the Technical Steering An issue can also be a requirement or request that breaks something within the existing Program Issue tracking and follow-up will be the responsibility of the Program Manager Who can log an Issue? Anyone participating in the Program, Technical Steering or Exec. Oversight When are issues escalated? Technical Steering to review all unresolved issues and escalate appropriately at regular meeting Timeliness / Decision may drive escalation outside of scheduled meetings Rapid Escalation Process Who can view the Issues Log? Issues log can be reviewed by any participant, p Technical Steering or Exec. Oversight on Secured Section of website. Open Issue log will be distributed to all appropriate parties prior to all scheduled meetings Issues using the Rapid Escalation Process will be distributed on an as needed basis Promote Rapid Identification, Escalation and Resolution of Issues Page 1

Jurisdiction: Empowerment of Teams Jurisdiction Escalation Rules The Executive Oversight : cutive Oversigh ht Exe Membership made up of all IT Directors participating or otherwise interested in the program. Resolves issues escalated from the Technical Steering Makes decisions on changes to scope, timeline, budget & policies (e.g. participation criteria, cost model) Recommend 2/3 majority vote to pass resolution Technical Steering Comm mittee The Technical Steering : Membership made up of rep from each participating unit (voluntary) Escalates policy issues to Executive Oversight Makes recommendations on issues regarding policy Makes decisions on issues regarding technical process designs & procedures (e.g. HW/SW config, baseline image, mgmt tool selection & configuration) Recommend 2/3 majority vote to pass resolution The Technical Steering is to Escalate Issues When Issues pertain to policy, scope and/or budget Issue cannot be resolved within the scope of the Technical Steering s jurisdiction Efforts to resolve the issue are unsuccessful or require Executive Oversight support Project Teams can use the Decision Escalation Criteria and Checklist to assess whether the issue has significant impact The Issue Escalation Template must be completed to all issues escalated to the Program Manager Note: For Critical issues, when a decision needed in less than 3 days, the Steering Chair will delegate decision making authority to the Program Manager to quickly resolve. Page 2

Jurisdiction: Empowerment of Teams ITESC SMARTcompu ting Program Office Jurisdiction The Program Office: Coordinates requests for governance consideration Facilitates Executive Oversight (ECO) & Technical Steering (TSO) meetings Coordinates change control process for image content & configuration Coordinates contracts & licensing administration for Tier 1 products Interfaces with vendor (for HW / SW & mgmt tool) Administrate program (recordkeeping, budget coordination, etc) Coordinates infrastructure capacity with sponsoring unit Initiates & coordinates incremental HW / SW refresh reviews Coordinates annual approval of Chargeback Prices Maintains program s web site Coordinates OLA: Operations Level Agreement Coordination Makes recommendations to develop and evolve the Program Advocates Program Facilitates Program communications Supervisory of SMS System Administrator Position The IT Executive Steering (ITESC): Strategic guidance from existing ITESC web: http://www.itap.purdue.edu/itesc/index.cfm Escalation Rules The Program Manager is to Escalate Issues When Issues pertain to policy, scope and/or budget Issue cannot be resolved within the scope of the Technical Steering s jurisdiction Efforts to resolve the issue are unsuccessful or require Executive Oversight support Project Teams can use the Decision Escalation Criteria and Checklist to assess whether the issue has significant impact The Issue Escalation Template must be completed to all issues escalated to the Program Manager Note: For Critical issues, when a decision needed in less than 3 days, the Steering Chair will delegate decision making authority to the Program Manager to quickly resolve. The IT Executive Steering (ITESC) is to Escalate Issues When The committee desires explanation or input Page 3

Issue Escalation and Resolution Governance Governance Structure IT Executive Steering Strategic guidance from existing IT Executive Steering Program Manager Level 1 Steering Goal: = 80% of decisions Level 2 Executive Oversight Goal: = 20% of decisions Make final decisions on behalf of Program Authorizes changes to scope, and/or budget as necessary Make decisions based on Jurisdiction or refer back to subcommittees for more analysis Utilize Rapid Escalation Process Escalate to Executive Oversight as necessary Solicit recommendations to Executive Oversight Maintain responsibility for issue management Makes day-to-day decisions (manages processes / procedures, when to escalate vs. no impact, participation eligibility, etc) Manages requests for EOC consideration Accountable to EOC Facilitates EOC & TSC meetings Program Communications Facilitator Clearly Defined Decision Making Authority for Each Level Page 4

Next Steps Review, discuss & approve Further develop Issue Escalation and Resolution Framework Issues Q&A Decision Escalation Criteria & Checklist Issue Escalation Template Rapid Decision-Making Process Page 5