Lockport Pool Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal Illinois Waterway

Similar documents
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL AT LOCKPORT REHABILITATION CASE STUDY. Brant Jones, P.E. 1 Thomas Mack, P.E. 2 Amy Moore, P.E.

Managing Our Water Retention Systems

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

How to Become a Navy Engineer For $78,000 in USD

USACE Dam Safety Program Current Approach & Methodology

Rehabilitation of Locks on the Kentucky River

Swannanoa River Flood Risk Management Study

Amherst Dam. Michael Juris - Village President Joe Behlen, P.E. WDNR Dam Safety Engineer Gerald Krueger, P.E. AECOM

Estabrook Dam A Discussion of Alternatives. Public Scoping Meeting June 5, 2014

Flood mitigation program for Gatun lake. Programa de mitigación de inundaciones del lago Gatún

CLIFTY CREEK PLANT MADISON, INDIANA

NASHVILLE DISTRICT JETS SAME

STRUCTURES Excavation and backfill for structures should conform to the topic EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL.

USACE Civil Works Infrastructure Investment Trends: Glide-Path to Benign Neglect?

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Jackson Gulch Outlet Canal Rehabilitation Project

New Orleans Hurricane Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Tour March 23 24, 2012

How To Rehabilitate A Dam In A Lake Dike

Watershed Rehabilitation Program in Texas

Nashville District Workload for Nashville SAME Professional Development Workshop

Mouth of the Columbia River Jetties Major Rehabilitation Study

The City of Ottawa Flood Hazards

RESUME Lee A. Knuppel, P.E.

Moving Small Mountains Vesuvius Dam Rehab

Understanding the Herbert Hoover Dike Rehabilitation Spillway, Plan 6 and EAA Storage Flow way Alternatives

Runaway barges damage Marseilles Lock and Dam during 2013 flood on the Illinois River Kenneth R. Olson and Lois Wright Morton

Inland Marine Transportation System Capital Investment Strategy

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

Understanding Your An Introduction to the Chicago Area s Combined Sewer Systems

Outlet stabilization structure

Potential Impacts of Hydrofracturing on Dam & Levee Safety

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in Texas

Index. protection. excavated drop inlet protection (Temporary) Block and gravel inlet Protection (Temporary)

FINAL TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM AWD FLOWS THROUGH FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION AREA July 16, 2012

Small Dam Hazard Assessment Inventory

HARBOR INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORIES Chicago Harbor, Illinois

Chapter 4. Flood Control

How To Check For Scour At A Bridge

City of Shelbyville Site Inspection Checklist

Stormwater Management in Chicago waterways :Basement Flooding and its prevention Kyungmin Kim

Failing Coastal Wood Infrastructure on the Great Lakes

Small Dam Repair The Stone Lake Dam Story. Joe Barron, P.E. SynTerra formerly the Fletcher Group, Inc. 148 River St. Suite 220 Greenville, S.C.

Public Law and Non-Structural Alternatives to Levee Repairs

PERFORMANCE OF DAMS AND SPILLWAYS 2009 GEORGIA FLOOD. Randall P. Bass, P.E. 1, 2. James R. Crowder, P. Joseph S. Monroe, P.E.

Contractor of the Year

6.0 Results of Risk Analyses

How To Install An Overhead Sewer

BINGHAMTON FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT

SIMULATION OF SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY CHANGE IN LARGE RIVER SYSTEMS. Stephen H. Scott 1 and Yafei Jia 2

FAILURE OF TETON DAM

Greater New Orleans Hurricane & Storm Damage Risk Reduction System

Appendix F Benefit-Cost Analysis of Flood Protection Measures

USACE Asset Management Program

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

Management of flooding downstream of dams

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

Wolf Creek Hydropower Rehabilitation Analysis Report

Gwinnett County NRCS Watershed Dam Rehabilitation Program

PERFORMANCE OF FLOOD-TESTED SOIL-CEMENT PROTECTED LEVEES. Kenneth D. Hansen, P.E. 1 Dennis L. Richards, P.E. 2 Mark E. Krebs, P.E.

Final. Contact person: Colin Whittemore Aurecon Centre 1 Century City Drive Waterford Precinct, Century City Cape Town, South Africa

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

April 17, 2015 SUMMARY OF SUBJECT MATTER

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Emergency Spillways (Sediment basins)

Flood Emergency Response Planning: How to Protect Your Business from a Natural Disaster RIC005

Land Disturbance, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Checklist. Walworth County Land Conservation Department

Upper Des Plaines River & Tributaries, IL & WI Feasibility Study

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

C O N S U L T A N T S RESUME

SIMPLIFIED INUNDATION MAPS FOR EMERGENCY ACTION PLANS. National Dam Safety Review Board Emergency Action Plan Workgroup

A Stream Restoration Case Study in the California Central Coast

CHAPTER 2 HYDRAULICS OF SEWERS

Storm Protection. Storm Protection

February 4, Report Recommendations and NIPSCO Responses. 4.3 Maintaining and Controlling Vegetation Growth

LAKE OKEECHOBEE and THE HERBERT HOOVER DIKE. A Summary of the Engineering Evaluation of Seepage and Stability Problems at the Herbert Hoover Dike.

Oakwood Beach Storm Damage Prevention Project NJDEP-Bureau of Coastal Engineering Glenn Golden, Project Manager U.S. Army Corps Civil Works Programs

Various options are discussed below.these low cost, low impact interventions can also be applied as general erosion control methods.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

Standard Operating Procedures for Flood Preparation and Response

FY08 SEWER POINT REPAIRS BID TABULATION

Reservoir Simulations for the Delaware River Basin Flood of June, 2006

Storm Drain Inlet Protection

Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.

Transcription:

Presentation to the Inland Waterways Users Board Lockport Pool Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal Illinois Waterway by Gary Loss, P.E. Rock Island District July 13, 2006

Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal A Landmark Civil Engineering Project North Branch Chicago River Lake Michigan Chicago Lock South Branch Chicago River CSSC Reversing the Chicago River from Lake Michigan to the Illinois River

History of the CSSC

Authorization History Public Law 97-377 directed the Department of the Army to implement the provisions of PL97-88, which provided that funds made available to the Corps of Engineers-Civil for O&M of the Illinois Waterway shall be available to operate and maintain the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal portion of the Waterway in the interest of navigation. Public Law 98-63, clarified that the CSSC includes the Control Structure and Lock in the Chicago River and other facilities as are necessary to sustain through navigation from Chicago Harbor on Lake Michigan to Lockport on the Des Plaines River.

1984 Memorandum of Agreement CSSC operated for sanitary, flood control and navigation purposes. Until 1984, specific responsibilities were vague. MOA executed in 1984 between Department of Army (DA) & Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Chicago ( MWRD) DA agreed to maintain Controlling Works foundation, piers and dolphins Lockport Lock (including operation) Approach embankment upstream to Controlling Works Powerhouse & Dam gravity (water retaining) structures Concrete guide wall upstream to Damen Ave

Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal (CSSC) on the Illinois Waterway CSSC Des Plaines River Approach Dike 40 Canal Wall Deep Run Creek Lockport Pool @ Downstream End Of the CSSC

Lockport to Brandon Road Lockport Lock & Dam Deep Run Creek Des Plaines River Brandon Road Lock & Dam

Illinois Waterway - T.J. O'Brien Lock & Dam 2005 Total Tonnage by Commodity Total Tons: 9,048,078 Waste Material 0.29% Petroleum 5.88% Other 0.39% Manufactured Machines 0.32% Chemical 2.04% Coal 25.82% Chemical Coal Container Crude Material Manufactured Goods 39.51% Container 0.00% Farm Products Manufactured Goods Manufactured Machines Other Petroleum Crude Material 19.88% Waste Material Farm Products 5.86%

Illinois Waterway - Lockport Lock & Dam 2005 Total Tonnage by Commodity Total Tons: 16,929,707 Other 0.44% Manufactured Machines 0.40% Petroleum 8.88% Waste Material 0.02% Chemical 10.68% Manufactured Goods 24.83% Farm Products 5.02% Crude Material 34.58% Coal 15.11% Container 0.05% Chemical Coal Container Crude Material Farm Products Manufactured Goods Manufactured Machines Other Petroleum Waste Material

Lockport Pool RER MVR prepared a Rehabilitation Evaluation Report for Major Rehab program funding on 5 project features in the Lockport Pool, River Mile 291 to 293.2. Submitted in March 2004 Approved in November 2004 Five Project Features (per requested funding source) Major Rehabilitation (Rehab/TF) Controlling Works Concrete Canal (Guide) Wall Approach Dike Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Powerhouse Embankment Clearing

Lockport Pool Reach Approach Dike Controlling Works Des Plaines River Powerhouse & Dam Canal Wall Lock

Approach Dike (Right Descending Bank) Constructed in early 1900 s 4,300 feet in length above the Powerhouse. Acts as high-hazard dam Early CSSC pool raise places canal levels above the core wall top. Constant seepage with chronic sinkhole development.

Approach Dike Proposed Concrete Cutoff Wall Recent actions 1992 Sand/bentonite cap installed. Seepage continued. 1997 100-foot length of test sheet pile wall installed at location of a major sinkhole. Seepage continues. Rehabilitation Scope Must be done while maintaining navigation & hydropower Concrete seepage cutoff placed via slurry trench $23.6 million (Rehab/TF)

Joliet Inundation Area Breach Flows Circumvent Upper End of Wall Joliet Wall Brandon Road Dam

Lockport Pool Reach Approach Dike Controlling Works Des Plaines River Powerhouse & Dam Canal Wall Lock

Concrete Canal Wall (Left Descending Bank) Lockport Pool reach has 399 monoliths, 60 with barge check posts. Acts as a high-head dam with maximum 40- foot head. Serious concerns of structural stability and integrity.

Concrete Canal Wall Original Construction 1890 s lower 22 feet, lime cement concrete, 800 psi 1924 upper 15 feet, Portland cement concrete No bond between the 2 parts Rehabilitation Scope Must be done while maintaining navigation and hydropower Pre-cast vertical face panels New horizontal tie-back concrete Rock anchors $87 million in repairs (Rehab/TF) for first 3 miles

Lockport Pool Reach Approach Dike Controlling Works Des Plaines River Powerhouse & Dam Canal Wall Lock

Controlling Works 1890 s Construction Releases stormwater to Des Plaines River during heavy rainfall Lowers CSSC water levels 5-10 feet within the Lockport Pool. Operated by MWRD MWRD wants to operate remotely.

Controlling Works Rehabilitation Scope Concrete repairs, stone work, brick tuck pointing Embankment reshaping, riprap $1.4 million of repairs (Rehab/TF)

Lockport Pool Reach Approach Dike Controlling Works Des Plaines River Powerhouse & Dam Canal Wall Lock

MWRD Powerhouse Constructed in 1905-07 Powerhouse & Dam Abandoned I&M Canal Lock 48- & 12-foot spillways Powerhouse Operated by MWRD CSSC pool regulation Hydropower

MWRD Powerhouse 48-foot spillway Spillway chute concrete is in very poor condition. Used on limited basis to pass debris. MWRD wants to use for routine pool regulation. 12-foot spillway Bulkhead concrete deterioration Rehabilitation Scope No Powerhouse work $1.2 million in spillway concrete replacement (O&M)

Embankment Clearing Massive embankment overgrowth Became Corps responsibility in 1984 Impossible to reliably monitor or inspect On MVR Critical O&M Backlog List Rehabilitation Scope Clearing of trees and brush $1.8 million (O&M)

Project Cost Summary PROJECT COST SUMMARY Description Major Rehab O&M Total Dam and Powerhouse $ 1,174,500 $ 1,174,500 Concrete Canal Wall $86,940,000 $86,940,000 Approach Dike $23,639,800 $23,639,800 Embankment Clearing $ 1,843,800 $ 1,843,800 Controlling Works $ 1,396,700 $ 1,396,700 Total Project $111,976,500 $ 3,018,300 $114,994,800 BENEFIT:COST RATIOS Concrete wall 1.44 Approach dike 1.20 Controlling works 5.39

Screening for Portfolio Risk Analysis (SPRA) July 2005 National Cadre #2 Findings Approach Dike > Inadequate for all 5 Load Cases Concrete Canal Wall > Inadequate for all 5 Load Cases Highest Ranking USACE Navigation Dam from SPRA High economic losses Loss of Life issues indeterminate

Lockport Lock & Dam Brandon Road Pool River = Illinois Reach = Reach 1 RS = 287.00 560 Legend WS PF 1 Ground Levee 550 Ineff Bank Sta Elevation (ft) 540 530 2004 Dam Break Water Level Normal Water Level Brandon Road Pool 510 520 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Station (ft)

Lockport Pool Dam Break Analyses Feb 2006 Preliminary Review Two scenarios (both with significant impact to navigation): Joliet Walls are not Breached and Brandon Road Dam reacts according to EAP: SDF w/ Breach Flows ~ 3,000 cfs peak flow into Joliet Sunny Day Failure ~ minor flow into Joliet Joliet Walls are Breached or Fails Brandon Road Dam does not react > Joliet Walls could be overtopped. Run-away barges could impact the wall with possible failure. Catastrophic Loss of Life will likely occur.

Lockport Lock & Dam Joliet Walls Hickory Creek

Brandon Road Pool Towards upstream end of the Joliet Wall (left descending bank)

Lockport Pool Recommendations FY 06 FY 07 FY 08 $500k wedge funding for engineering of Approach Dike and Canal Wall rehab. $1.5m wedge funding for engineering of Approach Dike rehab Capability of additional $1.5m additional for continued engineering of Canal Walls rehab. Initiate rehab construction on Controlling Works and Approach Dike FY 09 Initiate rehab construction on Canal Walls