[ Climate Data Collection and Forecasting Element ] An Advanced Monitoring Network In Support of the FloodER Program



Similar documents
Forecast-Informed Reservoir Operations: A Concept Supporting Water Supply and Flood Control

Climate, Drought, and Change Michael Anderson State Climatologist. Managing Drought Public Policy Institute of California January 12, 2015

FLOOD FORECASTING PRACTICE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

ARkStorm: California s Other Big One!

Improved Warnings for Natural Hazards: A Prototype System for Southern California

Flash Flood Guidance Systems

New challenges of water resources management: Title the future role of CHy

A Vision for Future Observations for Western U.S. Extreme Precipitation and Flooding

National Dam Safety Program Technical Seminar #22. When is Flood Inundation Mapping Not Applicable for Forecasting

Climate Change. Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist

THE STRATEGIC PLAN OF THE HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL PREDICTION CENTER

DESWAT project (Destructive Water Abatement and Control of Water Disasters)

Environmental Data Services for Delaware:

CLIMATE, WATER & LIVING PATTERNS THINGS

SIXTH GRADE WEATHER 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Climate Extremes Research: Recent Findings and New Direc8ons

Real Time Flood Alert System (RTFAS) for Puerto Rico

JASPERS Networking Platform

State-Federal Flood Operations Center Informational Sheet

WEATHER AND CLIMATE practice test

Risk and vulnerability assessment of the build environment in a dynamic changing society

Department of Commerce National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service

HAZARD RISK ASSESSMENT, MONITORING, MAINTENANCE AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (HAMMS) FOR LANDSLIDE AND FLOOD. Mohd. Nor Desa, Rohayu and Lariyah, UNITEN

Welcome to NASA Applied Remote Sensing Training (ARSET) Webinar Series

Southern AER Atmospheric Education Resource

End to End Multi Hazard Early Warning Systems By Curt Barrett Hydrometeorological Consultant

IBM Big Green Innovations Environmental R&D and Services

Georgia Performance Standards Framework for Natural Disasters 6 th Grade

Climate Change and Infrastructure Planning Ahead

WEATHER AND CLIMATE WHY DOES IT MATTER?

Monitoring and Early Management of Emergences: New Instruments

User s Guide. Zuniga Point. Point Loma

Hong Kong Observatory Summer Placement Programme 2015

Emergency Management Service. early warning FLOOD AND FIRE ALERTS. Space

National Weather Service Flash Flood Modeling and Warning Services

Ensuring the Preparedness of Users: NOAA Satellites GOES R, JPSS Laura K. Furgione

The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Correlation to. EarthComm, Second Edition. Project-Based Space and Earth System Science

CRS 610 Ventura County Flood Warning System Website

Establishing a Geospatial Intelligence Pipeline through Earth SySTEM Education

Section 5 CLIMATE TABLES

PRECIPITATION AND EVAPORATION

Joint Polar Satellite System (JPSS)

Integrated Water Resources Science and Services. National Water Center

Data Management Framework for the North American Carbon Program

How To Forecast Solar Power

FORECAST-COORDINATED OPERATIONS FOR THE YUBA-FEATHER RIVER RESERVOIR SYSTEM: INTERAGENCY COOPERATION

Overview of NASA Applied Remote Sensing Training Program on Water Resources and Disaster Management

climate science A SHORT GUIDE TO This is a short summary of a detailed discussion of climate change science.

Climate Change Long Term Trends and their Implications for Emergency Management August 2011

Drought in the Czech Republic in 2015 A preliminary summary

Geospatial Software Solutions for the Environment and Natural Resources

Flash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes

Climate Change in North Carolina

Real-time Ocean Forecasting Needs at NCEP National Weather Service

THE GEORGIA AUTOMATED ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING NETWORK: TEN YEARS OF WEATHER INFORMATION FOR WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

6. Base your answer to the following question on the graph below, which shows the average monthly temperature of two cities A and B.

Extra-Tropical Cyclones in a Warming Climate:

Glaciogenic Cloud Seeding to Increase Orographic Precipitation Bruce A. Boe Director of Meteorology

Measuring what we manage the importance of hydrological data to water resources management

Content Guide & Five Items Resource


RAPIDS Operational Blending of Nowcasting and NWP QPF

THIRD GRADE WEATHER 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

EPA Trends for wastewater Treatment in California

Data Management for the North American Carbon Program


Armenian State Hydrometeorological and Monitoring Service

NASA Earth System Science: Structure and data centers

Climate Change on the Prairie:

Impacts of Global Warming on Hurricane-related Flooding in Corpus Christi,Texas

Module 2 Educator s Guide Investigation 3

HISTORICAL FLOODS:

California Standards Grades 9 12 Boardworks 2009 Science Contents Standards Mapping

City of San Diego Water Demand Forecast

Development of an Integrated Data Product for Hawaii Climate

Idaho Power Company s

Head 168 HONG KONG OBSERVATORY

MODELING SPATIAL DIFFERENCES IN SNOWMELT RUNOFF TIMING. Frederic C. Lott and Jessica D. Lundquist 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Baudouin Raoult, Iryna Rozum, Dick Dee

Jessica Blunden, Ph.D., Scientist, ERT Inc., Climate Monitoring Branch, NOAA s National Climatic Data Center

Scholar: Elaina R. Barta. NOAA Mission Goal: Climate Adaptation and Mitigation

2. The map below shows high-pressure and low-pressure weather systems in the United States.

FORENSIC WEATHER CONSULTANTS, LLC

Grade 4 Standard 1 Unit Test Water Cycle. Multiple Choice. 1. Where is most water found on Earth? A. in glaciers B. in lakes C. in rivers D.

Estimating Potential Reduction Flood Benefits of Restored Wetlands

Fog and low cloud ceilings in the northeastern US: climatology and dedicated field study

Finnish Meteorological Institute s Services for Insurance Sector

Transcription:

[ Climate Data Collection and Forecasting Element ] An Advanced Monitoring Network In Support of the FloodER Program December 2010 1

Introduction Extreme precipitation and the resulting flooding events cause death and disruption to California. Although uncertainties abound, such events may become more commonplace or extreme as a result of warmer ocean temperatures related to climate change. Quantitive Precipitation Forecasts (QPF) provide an estimate of short-term precipitation that is used in flood forecasting. By using existing technologies and providing additional observations we can improve information and accuracies in forecasting these events. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration s Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA-ESRL) and Scripps Institution of Oceanography (Scripps) have developed a tiered program of observations to help California respond to extreme precipitation events with tiers of observations segregated according to increasing technical complexity and cost. The four tiers range from proven technologies that are available today at relatively low costs and are ready for rapid deployment, to high-cost technologies that still require development. An overview of the contents of the tiers is presented in this document. Over the next five years, NOAA-ESRL, in partnership with the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) and Scripps, will begin implementing elements of the first and second tiers of observation equipment along with associated data processing, modeling, data display, and decision support tools for an integrated information package. Data streams from these new observations will be made available to the public through the California Data Exchange Center (CDEC). To the extent possible, other partners will be identified to provide additional support for this effort called the 21st Century Extreme Precipitation Observation Network. A combination of the Tiers I and II observing components will greatly improve the ability to track and, ultimately, to predict the evolution and severity of extreme precipitation events. Recent research has shown that extreme precipitation in California is most often a result of land-falling atmospheric rivers. Figure 1 shows an atmospheric river that impacted California and the associated flooding that occurred on the Russian River 2

in 2004. Land-falling atmospheric rivers focus concentrated plumes of water vapor at the coast (hence their name) resulting in intense and orographically enhanced rainfall. Offshore, atmospheric rivers are monitored by polar-orbiting satellites, which provide twice-daily snapshots of the total amount of water vapor in the atmosphere. However, satellite based techniques do not work over land. Tiers I and II observations extend offshore satellite observations of atmospheric rivers over land so that moisture plumes can be tracked as they cross the coastal mountains and impact the Sierra Nevada. Tier I adds soil moisture observations that play a critical role in both flood forecasting (precursor) and long-term drought monitoring, and small radars designed to track time variations of the altitude of the rain-snow transition at many locations along the Sierra. Accurate estimation of the melting (freezing) altitude is critical to forecast runoff and the potential for flooding. Over time, these observations will create an important climate record and data sets with which models can be verified and forecasts improved. Figure 1. An atmospheric river, which impacted California on February 16, 2004. Warm colors indicate more water vapor. The full value of these observations will only be realized if, from the onset, assimilation and modeling systems are developed to take full advantage of the resulting data streams. Tools that bring the new observations into a coherent depiction of the pre storm and evolving storm-time environments will enhance quantitative prediction of precipitation. Thus, as the program is advanced through the observational tiers, a complementary effort in assimilation, modeling, and display will be necessary to ensure maximum benefit for the investment in observational infrastructure. 3

Decision support tools will be developed to integrate information (knowledge, modeling, observations) into rapidly accessible and understandable indicators and thresholds. These will provide frameworks for probabilistic threat assessments and decision-making regarding extreme precipitation and flood potentials over a variety of time scales. The immediate benefit comes in the operations arena where the new data will inform forecasting and flood management. Placing the data on CDEC will enable broad use of the data by outside agencies and the public. Over time the data collected from this network will provide valuable information for the description of California s climate and its long-term evolution. A Tiered Approach Investment in the Observation Program NOAA-ESRL and Scripps developed the concept of the 21st Century Observations Program for California based on a recognition that several new observational technologies have become available in the past decade, that offer marked enhancements and complements to existing observational networks developed in the later half of the 20th Century. Some of these new technologies are already being used in experimental settings and need only the support to extend them into sustained operational networks; other technologies are more expensive or more speculative at present. Consequently, the program of new observations was conceived in terms of a sequence of steps or tiers of observations of increasing complexity and cost. DWR has identified Tiers I and II as significant elements of upgrades for California s observation network that will benefit flood control and water supply in the short term and climate monitoring efforts in the long term. Figure 2 shows the locations and types of instruments in Tier I. The instruments include: A four tiered program has been developed to improve information for flood forecasting: Tier I builds on existing networks using proven, relatively low-cost technologies. Tier II continues the use of proven technology, with more costly equipment. Tier III adds higher cost technologies whose operational merit may not yet have been demonstrated conclusively. Tier IV observations use technologies that are optimistically anticipated but that remain speculative.» GPS-Met stations that continuously monitor variations of the total amount of water vapor in the atmosphere above the stations» Soil moisture monitoring at Remote Automated Weather Stations (RAWS) and DWR California Cooperative Snow Survey (CCSS) sites» Vertically pointing radar at reservoir sites to continuously monitor how much of the contributing catchments are receiving rain versus snow during storms. 4

Map of Tier I Figure 2. Map of California showing location and distribution of Tier 1 instrumentation (figure courtesy of Mike Dettinger and Allen White). The GPS-Met component of Tier I economizes by using existing networks of telemetered, ultra-precise GPS receivers maintained by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and Scripps for monitoring tectonic movements. In order to use these tectonic monitors for water-vapor observations, relatively minor meteorological equipment needs to be added to provide for key atmospheric water vapor information. Similarly, the soil-moisture component of Tier 1 builds upon the existing telemetry at monitoring sites of two of the State s existing meteorological and snow monitoring networks. Finally, the rain-snow radars are a new development that was largely motivated by the discussions that spawned the 21st Century Observations Program, extracting a low-cost solution from more complete but more expensive technologies that will be deployed more sparingly as part of Tier II. Tier II builds upon Tier 1 instrumentation, adding several Atmospheric River Observatories along the coast to the observation network. Whereas Tier I sites provide surface or integrated observations, Tier II sites profile the atmosphere to provide detailed information aloft. The location of these elements and their relative position to Tier I instrumentation is shown in Figure 3. 5

Map of Tier II Figure 3. Location of Tier II instrumentation in California Tiers III and IV are more speculative but give indication of strategies that would take advantage of some key developing technologies in coming years. Tier III adds offshore monitoring of the atmosphere using an ocean buoy network, and gap-filling radars across the state. Tier IV adds an offshore aerial-reconnaissance program to directly monitor the strength and location of atmospheric rivers approaching California by using unpiloted aerial vehicles. Data Assimilation, Forecasting, and Decision Support Displays The first two tiers of the enhanced observing system provide advanced forecasting products. The National Weather Service (NWS) global and national scale numerical modeling will allow deciphering impacts of large (Pacific) scale atmospheric processes on small-scale California river basins of concern over a 0- to 5-day period. The advanced observations will be used to create highly detailed depictions of existing weather that when used as model, initial conditions will significantly enhance the precipitation forecasts for day 0-2; the global-regional nested system will allow detailed forecasts out in the 3-5 day period. The combination of high resolution data-driven forecasts and globally influenced longer term 6

forecasts will provide water managers sound guidance to drive decisions out to 5 days and beyond. By running multiple versions of the regional models probabilistic, 5-day forecasts can be produced to aid water managers in their decision making. Five-Year Implementation Program The implementation of all Tier I and Tier II instrumentation are planned for 2008 through 2013. A year-by-year breakdown of instrumentation installations are outlined in table below. Details of the locations of each year s installation will be coordinated among DWR, NOAA and the Scripps personnel. Table 1. Year-to-year breakdown of Tier 1 & Tier 2 instrumentation implementation Tier 1 Proposed Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total GPS-Met Sites 84 8 16 20 20 20 84 Soil Moisture Sites 100 10 20 20 25 25 100 Snow Level Radars 24 2 2 6 7 7 24 Tier II Proposed Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total Atmos. River Obs. 3 0 0 1 1 1 3 Wind Profilers 8 0 0 2 3 3 8 Data streams from the field sensors will be made available to the research community and public through DWR s California Data Exchange Center. Points of Contact DWR: Jon Ericson Mike Anderson California Department of Water Resources Division of Flood Management 3310 El Camino Avenue Rm 200 Sacramento, CA 95821 Phone (916) 574-2830 jericson@water.ca.gov (Jon) manderso@water.ca.gov (Mike) USGS/Scripps/UCSD: Mike Dettinger and Dan Cayan USGS/Scripps Institution of Oceanography UC San Diego, Dept 0224 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, CA 92093-0224 Phone: (858) 822-1507 mdettinger@ucsd.edu or dcayan@ucsd.edu NOAA: Principal Contact: Timothy Schneider 325 Broadway, R/PSD2 7

For additional information, contact Mike Anderson (916) 574-2830 manderso@water.ca.gov Or visit us on the Web at www.water.ca.gov Arnold Schwarzenegger Governor Lester A. Snow Secretary of Resources Mark Cowin Director Department of Water Resources Prepared by GEI Consultants, Inc. for 8The California Department of Water Resources Naser Bateni, Program Manager (PE 36128)