Introduction. The following definitions may help you better understand the components of the data report.

Similar documents
Appendix D lists the Field Services Standard Operating Procedures. Appendix E lists the Biological Monitoring Standard Operating Procedures.

TERRA TEK LIMITED GUIDE TO SAMPLE HANDLING. Version 1.06

56 TOLEDO STREET, FARMINGDALE, NY P: F:

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM Accredited Fields of Testing

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Appendix C Data Validation Report

Ecology Quality Assurance Glossary

APPENDIX L DATA VALIDATION REPORT

APPENDIX C. DATA VALIDATION REPORT

Analytical Data Package Reports

Pace Analytical e-report

Section A LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia 2013 All Rights Reserved.

Evaluating Laboratory Data. Tom Frick Environmental Assessment Section Bureau of Laboratories

South Dakota s Statewide Ground Water Quality Monitoring Network

Chemistry 321, Experiment 8: Quantitation of caffeine from a beverage using gas chromatography

GUIDELINES FOR USE BY CLASS A LICENSEES IN MEETING SNP REQUIREMENTS JULY 1996

Bryte Chemical Laboratory Quality Assurance Manual

Samples RMN Analytical Report ( ) GC/FID Analysis (RM01) Nicotine Purity

Measurement by Ion Selective Electrodes

Technical Guidance Manual for the Implementation of the Hawai`i State Contingency Plan. Interim Final SECTION 10

APPENDIX II TIER I CHECKLIST

This report contains the analytical results for the samples received under chain of custody by TestAmerica on October 29, 2010.

1.2 This TAP is applicable to concrete, charcoal, coral, debris, wipes and soil.

How To Test For Contamination In Large Volume Water

ATTACHMENT 2. BMP Monitoring Plan Template

DATA VALIDATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM ROUTINE ANALYTICAL SERVICES

Phosphorus, Reactive (Orthophosphate)

DMR-QA Planning Guide 2015 DMR-QA 35: Plan for Success

Determination of Haloacetic Acids and Dalapon in Drinking Water by SPE and GC/ECD*

Cadmium Reduction Method Method to 30.0 mg/l NO 3 N (HR) Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls

Draeger-Tubes and accuro Pump

Sample Management SOP 2v8 Page 1 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 2 SAMPLE MANAGEMENT REVISION LOG. Revision Number Description Date

ANALYTICAL DETECTION LIMIT GUIDANCE. & Laboratory Guide for Determining Method Detection Limits

Version 1.0 September, Jean W. Munch and Paul E. Grimmett

Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry

ASSURING THE QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS

Technical Report. Automatic Identification and Semi-quantitative Analysis of Psychotropic Drugs in Serum Using GC/MS Forensic Toxicological Database

This study was performed by Patrick Sullivan and staff at TestAmerica Analytical Testing Corp., Westfield, MA, USA

METHOD 9075 TEST METHOD FOR TOTAL CHLORINE IN NEW AND USED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY (XRF)

STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

Third Party Data Validation: What you need to know and do!

DRAFT Changes to 25 Pa. Code Chapter 252 For Discussion Purposes Only January 21, 2015 CHAPTER 252. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION

1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan

The purpose of this bid is to procure a contract with a laboratory to provide analytical testing services on an as-needed basis.

Standard methods in water analysis

Drip Club 2540 Corporate Place, Suite B103 Monterey Park, CA 91754

Sample Analysis Design Step 2 Calibration/Standard Preparation Choice of calibration method dependent upon several factors:

Environmental Water Testing: Surface Water, Groundwater, Hard Water, Wastewater, & Seawater

Aliphatic/Aromatic Separation of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids or Water by Silica gel Fractionation

Halogen Free: What, Why and How. Presented by : Jim Cronin Environmental Monitoring and Technologies, Inc.

NWTPH-HCID. Hydrocarbon Identification Method for Soil and Water

CONFIRMATION OF ZOLPIDEM BY LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS SPECTROMETRY

1.1 This test method covers the qualitative and quantitative determination of the content of benzene and toluene in hydrocarbon wax.

ANALYTICAL REPORT LABORATORY DETAILS. Telephone Facsimile . SGS Reference Report Number Date Reported

What are the drinking water standards?

METHOD 8082A. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

LC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Docetaxel in Human Serum for Clinical Research

METHOD 3510C SEPARATORY FUNNEL LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION

Calculation of Molar Masses. Molar Mass. Solutions. Solutions

DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND DATA USABILITY EVALUATION TECHNICAL GUIDANCE

Standard Operating Procedure for Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (Lachat Method)

ANALYTICAL SUMMARY REPORT

Name: Class: Date: 2 4 (aq)

SPIKE RECOVERY AND DETERMINING A METHOD DETECTION LIMIT Pamela Doolittle, University of Wisconsin Madison, pssemrad@wisc.edu 2014

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Remediation Management Response Site Remediation Program

FerroVer Method 1 Method to 3.0, 1.0 to 30.0 and 10.0 to mg/l Fe Powder Pillows

LZV585 (B) The 1-cm path is aligned with the arrow on the adapter

Holcim EMR List of EN Standards and VDI Guidelines usable for Discontinuous Measurements in Cement Plants

QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL POLICY BREG SOIL AND WATER QUALITY LABORATORY UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE

S olid Ph ase Extraction (SP E) Method:

Quaternary Ammonium Compounds DOC

Fipronil Analysis By GC/XSD following Post-Extraction Gel Permeation Chromatography Cleanup

Ion Selective Electrodes

METHOD DETERMINATION OF NITRATE-NITRITE NITROGEN BY AUTOMATED COLORIMETRY

IB Chemistry. DP Chemistry Review

The First Quantitative Analysis of Alkylated PAH and PASH by GCxGC/MS and its Implications on Weathering Studies

AUTOMATED SAMPLE PREP CAPITAL EXPENDITURE JUSTIFICATION REPORT

Chlorine, Total. DPD Method 1 Method to 5.00 mg/l Cl 2 Test 'N Tube Vials. Test preparation. Instrument-specific information

Proficiency Testing In A Global Analytical Environment Benefits & Challenges. AOAC September 2007

Extraction of Cannabinoids in Marijuana and Edibles by QuEChERS

Technical Procedure for the Solid Phase Extraction of Acidic, Neutral and Basic Drugs for GC-MS Analysis

Read all instructions carefully before completing the application. Applications must be typewritten.

VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: TEXT AND METHODOLOGY Q2(R1)

METHOD 8020A AROMATIC VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

HS 1003 Part 2 HS 1003 Heavy Metals Test

On-Site Waste Water Fees

METHOD 3545 PRESSURIZED FLUID EXTRACTION (PFE)

Method 8155 NITROGEN, AMMONIA (0 to 0.50 mg/l NH 3 -N) For water, wastewater, seawater

Developing Quality Assurance Project Plans using Data Quality Objectives and other planning tools. Developing QAPPs 5/10/2012 1

US EPA - Region III BROWNFIELDS. Quality Assurance Project Plan. Template

Quality Assurance Manual

Application Note. Determination of Nitrite and Nitrate in Fruit Juices by UV Detection. Summary. Introduction. Experimental Sample Preparation

USEPA 1 FerroVer Method 2 Method to 3.00 mg/l Fe Powder Pillows or AccuVac Ampuls

Where does it come from?

LACHAT METHOD NUMBER D Rev 1, 21 March 2011 SCOPE AND APPLICATION Approximately g CN/L g CN/L. 09e

Transcription:

Introduction This document is designed to help our clients understand the quality control requirements and limitations of data reporting. There are three sections to this document. The first section will help to determine data usability. The second section will discuss the regulatory and methodology limitations. The final section deals with hold time and preservation requirements. Click on the bookmarks to the left for more information. The following definitions may help you better understand the components of the data report. The Quality Control Section of ESS Laboratory's analytical report is located after the Sample Results. It is used to determine the data usability of the samples. The Method Blank is an analyte free matrix, (reagent water, clean sand, sodium sulfate), which is carried through the complete preparation and analytical procedure. The Method Blank is used to evaluate contamination resulting from the complete preparation and analytical procedure. The Blank Spike (LCS) is an interference free matrix (same used for the Method Blank) spiked with known concentrations of the analytes of interest. It is analyzed to determine, without sample matrix, if the procedure is working within established control limits. Like the Method Blank it is carried through the complete preparation and analytical procedure. It is routinely performed in duplicate as the BSD (LCSD). The recoveries of the spiked analytes are evaluated to determine accuracy. Comparison of the BS to the BSD will yield a precision measurement. The Matrix Spike is a separate aliquot of the sample spiked with known concentrations of the analytes of interest. It is analyzed to determine, including the matrix interferences, if the procedure is working within established control limits. Like the Blank Spike it is carried through the complete preparation and analytical procedure. It is routinely performed in duplicate as the MSD. The recoveries of the spiked analytes are evaluated to determine accuracy in a given matrix. Comparison of the MS to the MSD will yield a precision measurement in a given matrix. The Duplicate is a separate aliquot of the sample carried through the complete preparation and analytical procedure. Comparison of the Sample to the Duplicate will yield a precision measurement in a given matrix. See Blank Spike/Matrix Spike for Blank Spike Duplicate and Matrix Spike Duplicate definitions. The Standard Reference Material is a third party standard with known concentrations in matrix similar to the sample. Surrogate Standards are analytes added to a sample at a known concentration in order to determine extraction efficiency. Surrogate Standards are analytes chemically similar to those being extracted. An Internal Standard is an analyte or group of analytes added to a sample at a constant concentration, for calibration and quantitation. The internal standard is an analyte chemically similar to those being evaluated. It is typically added in GC/MS methods to correct analyte concentrations during analysis. The Continuing Calibration Verification is a check standard used to determine if the sample analysis is within control limits.

Quality Control Section The quality control section of the report is separated by analysis and then batches within the analysis. A batch of samples consists of samples that were prepared at the same time using the same preparation method. A batch can consist of up to 20 field samples prepared with a Method Blank (BLK), Blank Spike (BS), Blank Spike Duplicate (BSD), Matrix Spike (MS) and Duplicate (DUP)/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD). These samples are designated as Batch#-Abbreviation (ie BG92407- BLK1). A sheet is attached to show the relationship between batch numbers and samples.

Method Blank The Method Blank can show contamination that may have occurred during the preparation step. If the level of the blank is less than 10% of the sample or the sample is significantly below the regulatory limit, sample will be flagged appropriately. This level of contamination would not be considered significant and would not affect data usability.

Blank Spike The Blank Spike is a measure of the accuracy of the test procedure. If an analyte for any Blank spikes is outside of criteria, that particular analyte needs to be evaluated. If Blank Spikes are above criteria, there is possibility of a high bias; below criteria, there is a possibility of a low bias for the analytes being evaluated. High bias would not be of concern for samples under a regulatory limit. Low bias would be of concern for samples that are under a regulatory limit depending on proximity to the limit. Extrapolation based on percent recovery would be advisable, however extremely low recoveries would affect data usability.

Matrix Spike The Matrix Spike is a measure of accuracy with regards to matrix effect. It is evaluated in the same way as the Blank Spike. The difference being that analytes that are outside of criteria in the Matrix Spike and not in the Blank Spike are showing matrix effects. Again extrapolation can be used however extremely low recoveries affect data usability.

Blank Spike Duplicate, Duplicate and Matrix Spike Duplicate The Blank Spike Duplicate, Duplicate and Matrix Spike Duplicate are measures of precision. The Blank Spike Duplicate tests the precision of the procedure; the other two test the precision in regards to matrix. If the Duplicate and/or Matrix Spike Duplicate are outside of criteria, while the Blank Spike Duplicate is acceptable, it is assumed that the sample is non-homogeneous. This data would represent a range more than a finite point.

Standard Reference Material The Standard Reference Material is a measure of the accuracy of the test procedure for a particular matrix. If an analyte for any Standard Reference Material is outside of criteria, that particular analyte needs to be evaluated. If any Standard Reference Material analytes are above criteria, there is possibility of a high bias; below criteria, there is a possibility of a low bias for the analytes being evaluated. High bias would not be of concern for samples under a regulatory limit. Low bias would be of concern for samples that are under a regulatory limit depending on proximity to the limit. Extrapolation based on percent recovery would be advisable, however extremely low recoveries would affect data usability.

Surrogate Recoveries Surrogate recoveries represent the extraction efficiency for groups of analytes within a sample. Each surrogate represents a group of analytes. If surrogate recoveries are above criteria, a high bias is assumed for that group of analytes; below criteria, a low bias is assumed. High bias would not be of concern for analytes that are under a regulatory limit. Low bias would be of concern for analytes that are under a regulatory limit depending on proximity to the limit. Extrapolation based on percent recovery would be advisable, however extremely low recoveries would affect data usability. See Table for relationship between analytes and the surrogates. SVOA Surrogate Information VOA Surrogate Information EPH Surrogate Information UCM/Coelution It may not be possible to calculate Surrogate Recoveries due to unresolved complex mixture (UCM/Coelution). The surrogate peak can not be distinguished or separated from the mixture of components that are present in the sample.

Internal Standards (IS) Internal Standards (IS) are used to quantify a group of analytes. If Internal Standard recoveries are outside of criteria, the analytes represented by that particular Internal Standard need to be evaluated. If the matrix has coeluted with the Internal Standard to create a higher result, the data would have a low bias. Otherwise Internal Standards outside of criteria have caused the data to be adjusted more than the method allows for but does not necessarily create a bias one way or the other. This data is suspect and should not be used for important decision making. See Table for relationship between analytes and the internal standards. SVOA Internal Information VOA Internal Information

Continuing Calibration Verifications (CCVs) Continuing Calibration Verifications (CCVs) are used for analyses that do not require a daily calibration. If CCV recoveries are above criteria, a high bias is assumed for that analyte; below criteria, a low bias is assumed. High bias would not be of concern for analytes that are not detected or under the regulatory limit needed. Low bias would be of concern for analytes that are under a regulatory limit depending on proximity to the limit. Extrapolation based on percent recovery would be advisable, however extremely low recoveries would affect data usability.

Elevated Method Reporting Limits Samples are diluted when an analyte exceeds the highest level calibration standard. If the level of the analyte does not cause the run to be unusable, the original run and diluted run can be reported. If the level of the analyte causes the run to be unusable (saturates the detector), only the diluted run will be reported and flagged for Elevated Method Reporting Limits. Matrix Interferences Samples are also diluted when there is a large matrix interference that cannot be cleaned up prior to running the sample. The sample must be diluted so that the interference does not mask the analyte(s). Once the interference has been negated, the analyte(s) can be reported. This may cause the Method Reporting Limit to exceed the regulatory limit. In this case, the sample will be flagged accordingly. Diluted Below It is not always possible to evaluate surrogate and matrix spike recoveries in a diluted sample. If the dilution is large enough, the concentrations will be diluted below the Method Reporting Limits. These samples will be flagged accordingly. Matrix Masked/Coelution Samples with high target values or matrix interferences can mask the recovery of the analytes or co-elute with the analytes. The analytes can not be accurately distinguished or separated from the existing concentrations of target analytes or other unknown components that are present in the sample. These samples will be flagged accordingly.

Quadratic Regressions Quadratic Regressions are an allowable form of calibration for organic compounds. This calibration should be kept to a minimum. A large number of quadratic regressions indicate that the instrument is not running properly. Analytes using quadratic regression should not be evaluated outside of the calibration range (no E flags or J flags should be used).

Dual Column Confirmation Some organic analysis using GC (Pesticides, PCBs, etc) requires dual column confirmation of all reportable results. Samples are run on two different columns and results should agree to within 40%. Results outside of 40% are reviewed by analysts for interference or coelution and flagged accordingly. The result reported is the value considered to have the best chromatography.

Benzidine/Pentachlorophenol Tailing Factor Tailing factor is used to evaluate the performance of the SVOA Mass Spec instrument. When the tailing factor is >2, the columns are showing some signs of deterioration which will occur with continual use. The tailing factor must be narrated and instrument maintenance will be performed as necessary. This may affect the chromatography of all analytes, however, it does not add bias to the data reported.

Cartridge Contamination Unrelated cartridge contamination occurs during the fractionation step of the EPH procedure. The cartridge that the laboratory uses contains plasticizers which extract into the F2 Fraction. The method allows for contaminant subtraction as long as the laboratory identifies and quantifies the contamination by Mass Spec. The laboratory must narrate this subtraction. The results reported have already been corrected for the contamination.

Initial Calibration Verification The Initial Calibration Verification is a second source standard used to verify the calibration curve. While the CAM allows for some failures, the analytes that fail may have a low or high data bias.

Estimated Value When an analyte is reported above the high point of the calibration curve, the analyte is considered an Estimated value and qualified accordingly.

Potential Presence of PCBs The PP Qualifier is used when the chromatogram shows the potential presence of PCBs in a sample. While the peaks and patterns may not be exact, the analyst has determined that the PCB may be present in a weathered state.

Reducing Conditions The eh-ph data is used to determine whether Chromium could exist in the Hexavalent state in a particular sample. The R qualifier is used to explain the low matrix spike recoveries in a sample when it is not possible for Hexavalent Chromium to exist.

Serial Dilution The Serial Dilution is used to determine matrix interference in Metals samples. For samples containing analytes greater then 50 times the reporting limit, the serial dilution should be within 10%. Results greater then 10% would indicate a low bias for that analyte.

CAM Method Limitations 8260 Aqueous 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) must use 8011 to achieve GW1 and RCGW1 limits. 1,4-Dioxane must use 8270 with isotope dilution to achieve GW1 and RCGW1 limits. 8260 Soil Must use Low Level method to achieve S1GW1, S2GW2 and RCS1 limits for: 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,4-Dioxane 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone cis-1,3-dichloropropene Dibromochloromethane Methylene Chloride trans-1,3-dichloropropene In addition, must use Low Level method to achieve S1GW2, S2GW2, S2GW3 and RCS2 limits for: 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Dibromochloromethane Meeting required limits will also be affected by sample size, dilution and percent solids. The laboratory will make the best effort to compensate and meet all limits. However, some samples will not be able to be reported below required limits. Use the Data Checker EDD to review limit exceedances.

RCP Method Limitations 8260 Aqueous 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) must use 8011 to achieve GA GWPC criteria. 8260 Soil Must use Low Level method to achieve Residential: 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) Must use Low Level Method to achieve GA and GAA Mobility: 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) 1,2-Dichloroethane Acrylonitrile Benzene Bromodichloromethane Chloromethane cis-1,3-dichloropropene Dibromochloromethane Methylene Chloride Trans-1,3-Dichloropropene Vinyl Chloride Must use Low Level Method to achieve GB Mobility: Acrylonitrile 8081 Pesticides Aqueous The laboratory can not achieve the Dieldrin limit in Groundwater. Meeting required limits will also be affected by sample size, dilution and percent solids. The laboratory will make the best effort to compensate and meet all limits. However, some samples will not be able to be reported below required limits. Use the Data Checker EDD to review limit exceedances.

ESS Laboratory s Guide to Sample Handling and Preparation Preservative Hold Time Vol ph Analysis Aqueous Soil Water Soil ml check Chlorine (TRC) 50 Dissolved Oxygen 300 ph 4 o C Immediate 50 NO Sulfite N/A Temperature N/A N/A Chromium (VI) 24 hrs 28 d 50 Coliform 100 Iodide 4 o C 100 NO Odor 24 hours 100 Plate Count 100 BOD 5 day 200 Color 50 Nitrate 25 Nitrite 4 o 25 C 48 hours NO Orthophosphate 25 Settleable Solids 1000 Surfactants (MBAS) 250 Turbidity 50 Sulfide Zn Ace/NaOH - 4 o C 4 o C 50 TOX (VOA vial) H 2 SO 4 or HCl - 4 o C 4 o C 40 Flash/Reactivity NP - 4 o C NP - 4 o C 7 days NO TDS/TS/TSS/TVS 4 o C 4 o 100 C Acidity/Alkalinity 4 o C 4 o C 100 NO TX (VOA vial) 4 o C 4 o C 400 *** Cyanide (Amenable) NaOH - 4 o C NP - 4 o C 14 days 100 Cyanide (Total) NaOH - 4 o C NP - 4 o C 100 Metals* (Total/Diss.)- HNO NP - 4 o 3-4 o C C 6 months 100 Yes Except Cr(VI) and Mercury 4 o C 4 o C Mercury* (Total/Diss.) HNO 3-4 o C NP - 4 o C 28 days 50 Yes Ammonia 250 COD 4 o 25 C Kjeldahl Nitrogen (Total) 250 Nitrate-Nitrite 25 Yes Oil & Grease/TPH Glass only 1000 Phenol Glass only 250 H Phosphorous (Tot/Hyde) 2 SO 4 NP 50 TOC (VOA vial) 40 Paint Filter N/A None Required 28 days Asbestos N/A Bromide N/A Chloride 4 o C 25 Fluoride 25 Salinity 50 NO Silica 50 4 o C Spec. Conductivity 50 Sulfate 50 Siloxane NP - 4 o C MeOH - 4 o C 1000 SVOA (625/8270/PAH) NP - 4 o C NP - 4 o C 7 d 14 d 2000 DRO/TPH-GC (8100M) HCl - 4 o C NP - 4 o C 7 d 14 d 1000 EPH HCl - 4 o C NP - 4 o C 14 d 7 d 1000 Yes Herbicides (8151) NP - 4 o C NP - 4 o C 7 d 14 d 1000 PCB (608, 8082) NP - 4 o C NP - 4 o C 7 d 14 d 1000 Pesticide (608, 8081) 5-9 ph - 4 o C NP - 4 o C 7 d 14 d 1000 *** Volatile Organics (524.1, 601, 624, 5035, 8260) EDB & DBCP GRO 4 o C Na 2 S 2 O 3-4 o C HCL - 4 o C MeOH** - 4 o C NP - 4 o C NP - 4 o C 14 d 14 d 3 vial Yes VPH HCL - 4 o C MeOH** - 4 o C 14 d 28 d 3 vial * Dissolved metals must be field filtered before preservation or brought to lab unpreserved and filtered in lab within 24 hours. ** Samples are to be preserved in the field with methanol. ***These parameters must be tested in sample receiving for ph Cyanide, Pesticide (608)