Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.



Similar documents
Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

Thank you to all of our 2015 sponsors: Media Partner

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

1. City Council confirm the following principles for watercourse management in Toronto:

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Neversink River East Branch

DELAWARE COUNTY STREAM CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE WEST BRANCH DELAWARE RIVER CANNONSVILLE RESERVOIR BASIN

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

CHAPTER 3A Environmental Guidelines for STREAM CROSSING BY ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLES

HERE COMES THE RAIN AGAIN Stormwater Management in a Changing Climate at the City of Toronto

Class Environmental Assessment for Remedial Flood and Erosion Control Projects

BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Attachment 1 CARRUTHERS CREEK FLOOD MANAGEMENT and ANALYSIS DRAFT TERMS OF REFERENCE

Carlton Fields Memorandum

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

How To Protect A Floodplain From Flooding

Prattsville Berm Removal Project. 1.0 Project Location

Guideline: Works that interfere with water in a watercourse watercourse diversions. September 2014

Pioneer Park Stormwater Management Rehabilitation Project Town of Richmond Hill Engineering and Public Works Department Design, Construction and

Presented by Dani Wise Johnson Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

Appendix J Online Questionnaire

Avison Management Services Ltd. COMPANY PROFILE

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

Liquid Capital. Cochran s Creek: A Case Study in Stream Mitigation Banking in Georgia

Mission Creek Flood Control & Restoration Project. City of Fremont, Alameda County


RIPRAP From Massachusetts Erosion and Sediment Control Guidelines for Urban and Suburban Areas

4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets

7.0 Stream Restoration

WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING DESIGN LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY AND RIVER RESTORATION.

IUCN Guidelines to Avoid Impacts of Water Resources Projects on Dams and Other Water Infrastructure

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Impact Assessment: Planning Guidance for Developers

Vermont Economic Resiliency Initiative (VERI) Community Forum Barre City & Barre Town

1.0 Introduction. 2.0 Water Taking: Overview and Current Regulatory Context

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS

Code of Practice for Pipelines and Telecommunication Lines Crossing a Water Body

Community Workshop 5. Overarching Goals for Machado Lake Ecosystem and Wilmington Drain Multi-Use Projects

Catchment Scale Processes and River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk

LYNDE CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM WATER ACT APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE

Engineering in the water environment: good practice guide. River crossings

Develop hazard mitigation policies and programs designed to reduce the impact of natural and human-caused hazards on people and property.

Flood Hazard Area Technical Manual Section 8 Bank Stabilization and Stream Restoration

CASE STUDY. City of Grand Rapids Stormwater Asset Management Program. City of Grand Rapids. By the Numbers

SCHNEIDER CREEK REMEDIATION CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM

Flood Damage Prevention in Delaware County, NY

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

Project Manager. Geoff Masotti, P.Eng. T Ext. 254 T

Construction Specification for Sewer Bypass Flow Pumping

DISTRICT VALUES STATEMENTS, GOALS, ACTION ITEMS, AND ONGOING TASKS FOR 2015 Adopted by the Board of Directors December 10, Values Statements.

Green Spaces to Improve Waterways and Communities

Photo Credit: Geoff Brosseau

MS4 Municipal Stormwater Compliance: Pollutant Removal through Floodplain Restoration / Reconnection Villanova Urban Stormwater Partnership

Why should communities invest in resiliency? What are the steps communities can take to become more resilient?

US Army Corps of Engineers Authorities and Programs

Floodplain Connectivity in Restoration Design

URBAN DRAINAGE CRITERIA

Flood Plain Reclamation to Enhance Resiliency Conserving Land in Urban New Jersey

Waldo Canyon Fire. Mark Shea Watershed Planning Supervisor August 23, 2012

30-DAY PUBLIC NOTICE CHELSEA RIVER, EAST BOSTON MASSACHUSETTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK PROTECTION PROJECT

Table 2: State Agency Recommendations Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets

King County, Washington Policies and Practice for the Use of Eminent Domain For Flood Risk Reduction

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

How To Manage Water Quality In Korea

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

Muddy River Restoration Project Project Description

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

Towards sustainable and strategic management of water resources

CLACKAMAS COUNTY ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

Cooksville Creek Flood Evaluation Master Plan EA Final Report

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

Watersheds, Streams, & Highways: Resiliency in Disaster Recovery Through Partnerships and Innovation

RISK-BASED APPROACH TO DESIGNING AND REVIEWING PIPELINE STREAM CROSSINGS TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO AQUATIC HABITATS AND SPECIES

The checklist utilized by the Authority will be similar to that which is shown below. Project Name: Location: Consulting Engineering Firm:

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

A Geospatial Solution for Minimizing Risk. Pipeline Hazard Categorization

A. Flood Management in Nevada

WATER QUALITY MODELING TO SUPPORT THE ROUGE RIVER RESTORATION

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

Passive Restoration 101: Framework and Techniques Overview. Amy Chadwick, Great West Engineering August 26, 2015 Butte, America

Shoreline Master Programs Handbook Chapter 15, Shoreline Stabilization

Sustainability Brief: Water Quality and Watershed Integrity

Stream Restoration Post-Implementation Annual Monitoring Report Year 2: 2013 Covering the Period of July 2012 to July 2013

SECTION 5.4 LOGJAM REMOVAL AND RIVER RESTORATION. Overview. Logjam Removal Using Heavy. Tools. Machinery. Large-Scale River Restoration

Floodplain Development Land Use Review

Shooks Run Drainage Study Basic Terminology

Chapter 3 CULVERTS. Description. Importance to Maintenance & Water Quality. Culvert Profile

Baltimore County Stream Restoration Improves Quality of Life

2D Modeling of Urban Flood Vulnerable Areas

CHAD R. GOURLEY SPECIALTY EMPLOYMENT

Transcription:

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013 Rationale Underground infrastructure may be at risk from valley, streambank or streambed erosion. If at-risk erosion areas are not adequately monitored and effectively mitigated, during storm events there is increased risk that erosion of the natural cover will expose the infrastructure, and the exposed infrastructure may fail. The Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure are designed to assist the proponent in developing a proactive monitoring and mitigation programs in advance of a spill. Through its monitoring programs, TRCA may have available aquatic, hydraulic, soil, terrestrial natural heritage, or erosion data as well as technical expertise to assist the proponent, as well as information related to infrastructure on its lands. TRCA recognizes that protecting human health and the environment are primary concerns in the event of a spill. Short-term and long term containment of materials from a spill is key to minimizing the risks. Thus, measures to prevent spills are seen as a priority. In the event of a spill, measures to contain it as close to its source are of primary concern, followed by measures to contain it within a river basin prior to its reaching Lake Ontario. Should a spill occur, it is imperative that baseline information be available to facilitate development of a remediation and compensation plan. EMP Documentation The EMP intended to be is an action oriented document. It summarizes the results of the studies undertaken in Steps I, II and III. The EMP provides detailed mitigation, monitoring, and contingency plans, and provides a detailed plan for reporting and communications for implementing the EMP based on adaptive management principles. TRCA reviews the EMP based on requirements under Ontario Regulation 166/06 and the Canada Fisheries Act. TRCA Concerns As watershed managers, land owners and regulators, TRCA is concerned with three aspects of underground infrastructure operations as related to spills management: 1. Proactive pipeline exposure and failure risk assessment 2. Spills response planning 3. Rehabilitation and restoration planning To develop these assessments and plans, it is essential that baseline information be collected.

Step I: Proactive Pipeline Exposure and Failure Risk Assessment To ensure there is a proactive approach to managing potential areas of pipeline failure or fracture at valley, stream and wetland crossings, TRCA strongly recommends that a proactive risk assessment criterion be developed at each crossing of a valley, stream or wetland, based on various critical instream and slope stability parameters. A numerical rating matrix should be developed to assess the time frame and the storm event that would necessitate further pipe remediation. Following are the factors that are critical in the exposure and failure assessment: i. Depth of cover survey at all crossings ii. Stream geomorphic conditions iii. Valley slope conditions iv. Emergency procedure for pipeline repair or securement. Note: Ontario Regulation 166/06 regular or emergency works permits may be required. To complete the proactive risk assessment at each crossing of a valley, stream or wetland, field investigations and study is required. The following baseline information should be collected on frequently sufficient basis, depending on initial investigations and peak storm events, to establish and confirm the following: 1. Depth of cover at pipe crossing locations (stream bank/bed and valley slope) a. In-stream vertical depth of the pipe from the bottom of the watercourse to the top of the pipe - when downcutting of the watercourse occurs, there must be sufficient natural cover to ensure the integrity of the pipe is protected. b. Horizontal distance of the pipe from the edge of the watercourse to the side of the pipe when streambank erosion occurs, there must be sufficient natural cover to ensure the integrity of the pipe is protected. c. Horizontal distance of the pipe from the edge of the valley wall to the side of the pipe when valley wall erosion occurs, there must be sufficient natural cover to ensure the integrity of the pipe is protected 2. Fluvial geomorphic assessments upstream of the infrastructure, including: a. Stream geomorphic indicators b. Bed scour c. Bed material characteristics d. Stream meander 3. Slope stability assessment at valley walls, including: a. Toe erosion assessment b. Slope stability assessment

Step II: Spills Response Planning To ensure there is a proactive approach to managing spills response timing, TRCA recommends a proactive spills response plan be established that coordinates confirmed access points to watercourse and wetland areas, as well as Lake Ontario that is based on an analysis of: i. Spills response timing, including spills detection, shut-off valve activation, and site mobilization ii. Predicted times of travel from pipeline downstream under various streamflow conditions (baseflow, 2 100 year storm events, regional storm events) iii. Inventory of vulnerable receptors (significant habitats or uses) downstream of the pipeline iv. Mitigation methods (river based, lake-based) v. Spills response protocols (communication, access points through natural areas, methods). Note: Ontario Regulation 166/06 permits may be required. vi. Spill containment protocols (communication, access points, methods for containment under base flow and high flow conditions). Note: Ontario Regulation 166/06 emergency works permits may be required. vii. Emergency procedure for pipeline repair or securement. Note: Ontario Regulation 166/06 emergency works permits may be required, as may be approvals under the Canada Fisheries Act. To develop a proactive spills response plan that addresses TRCA concerns, the following baseline information is required: 1. Pre-planned access routes to watercourses, wetland or shoreline/lake areas based an analysis of on: a. Spills response timing (see above) b. Hydraulic and hydraulic data (baseflow, 2 100 year storm events, regional storm events) c. Storm sewer outfall locations (related to infrastructure where a spill on tableland could travel through catch basins to watercourses and require cleanup in natural areas). 2. Pre-planned mitigation requirements in watercourses, wetland or shoreline/lake areas based an analysis of on: a. Aquatic surveys downstream of the infrastructure, including lake-based b. Terrestrial natural heritage surveys downstream of the infrastructure, including lake-based c. Land use analysis in valley, stream and natural areas, including land ownership, recreational facilities, parks, trails and other public uses

Step III: Rehabilitation and Restoration Planning It is acknowledged that legislative requirements for spill rehabilitation and restoration fall under the purview of provincial and federal governments. However, it is TRCA s expectation that spill clean-up and will include as a minimum, complete rehabilitation and restoration of impacted areas through a floodplain, riparian area or parkland restoration plan, as appropriate. To ensure there is a proactive approach to rehabilitating and restoring areas that are damaged through a spill, TRCA recommends that commitments be established including: i. Commitments for rehabilitation and restoration (financial, timing) ii. Baseline information for downstream areas, including riverine, wetland and shoreline, including terrestrial, ecological, and land use information iii. Ontario Regulation 166/06 permits may be required for rehabilitation and restoration efforts in valley lands, flood plains, streambeds (including the removal of deposits), and riparian zones, as may be approvals under the Canada Fisheries Act. To facilitate the development of a rehabilitation and restoration plan in the event of a spill, it is recommended baseline information be available to proactively guide the extent and the nature of clean-up activities occur. This information should be updated on a five to 10 year cycle: 1. Aquatic surveys downstream of the infrastructure, including lake-based 2. Terrestrial natural heritage surveys downstream of the infrastructure, including lake-based 3. Hydraulic data 4. Soil data 5. Water quality information 6. Watershed management strategies and plans, including natural heritage and aquatic strategies, produced by TRCA and updated on a regular basis for each of its watersheds 7. Land use analysis in valley, stream and natural areas, including land ownership, recreational facilities, parks, trails and other public uses 8. Photo inventories of land uses, and terrestrial and aquatic systems. Summary It is increasingly recognized that underground infrastructure, including sewers, oil and gas pipelines in or near valley and stream corridors, and wetland areas may pose a significant risk to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, public park systems, as well as to human health should they fail. In urban areas, historically infrastructure was built in and through valley and stream corridors and now, that same infrastructure is vulnerable to stream flows that are ever stronger and more frequent. These changes to stream flow, is resulting in increased rates of erosion on valley side slopes and in the watercourses and wetlands themselves. The result is there is an ever increasing risk of failure if the erosion exposes the pipeline, and the exposed pipeline then fractures. Climate change is affecting stream flow, and that is further increasing the vulnerability of our watersheds and is exacerbating issues related to erosion and the potential for pipeline failure. A secondary concern is that if the

pipeline fractures on table land, and the sewage, gas or oil travels unmitigated through the storm sewer system, it will also impact the natural and park systems. These guidelines have been developed by TRCA over a number of years through working with proponents of sewer, gas and oil pipeline infrastructure under emergency situations. The guidelines were developed as a proactive approach to managing potential failures or fractures of pipelines in valley and stream corridors and wetland areas, and as a means of ensuring the protection, mitigation and restoration of our terrestrial, aquatic and public park systems. Document #: 638349