Application Note # LCMS-66 Straightforward N-glycopeptide analysis combining fast ion trap data acquisition with new ProteinScape functionalities



Similar documents
ProteinScape. Innovation with Integrity. Proteomics Data Analysis & Management. Mass Spectrometry

Application Note # LCMS-81 Introducing New Proteomics Acquisiton Strategies with the compact Towards the Universal Proteomics Acquisition Method

Electron Transfer Dissociation (ETD) Innovation with Integrity. Look Beneath the Surface. Ion Trap MS

Thermo Scientific PepFinder Software A New Paradigm for Peptide Mapping

In-Depth Qualitative Analysis of Complex Proteomic Samples Using High Quality MS/MS at Fast Acquisition Rates

SimGlycan Software*: A New Predictive Carbohydrate Analysis Tool for MS/MS Data

Application Note # LCMS-92 Interlaboratory Tests Demonstrate the Robustness and Transferability of the Toxtyper Workflow

# LCMS-35 esquire series. Application of LC/APCI Ion Trap Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Multiresidue Analysis of Pesticides in Water

Structural Analysis of Labeled N-Glycans from Proteins by LC-MS/MS Separated Using a Novel Mixed-Mode Stationary Phase

SimGlycan Software*: A New Predictive Carbohydrate Analysis Tool for MS/MS Data

AB SCIEX TOF/TOF 4800 PLUS SYSTEM. Cost effective flexibility for your core needs

Application Note # LCMS-62 Walk-Up Ion Trap Mass Spectrometer System in a Multi-User Environment Using Compass OpenAccess Software

Bruker ToxScreener TM. Innovation with Integrity. A Comprehensive Screening Solution for Forensic Toxicology UHR-TOF MS

Biopharmaceutical Glycosylation Analysis

Effects of Intelligent Data Acquisition and Fast Laser Speed on Analysis of Complex Protein Digests

How To Analyse A Glycan

Application Note # MT-90 MALDI-TDS: A Coherent MALDI Top-Down-Sequencing Approach Applied to the ABRF-Protein Research Group Study 2008

GLYCOSYLATION OF PROTEINS STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND ANALYSIS

amazon SL Innovation with Integrity Setting New Standards in Performance, Simplicity and Value Ion Trap MS

Tutorial for Proteomics Data Submission. Katalin F. Medzihradszky Robert J. Chalkley UCSF

Master course KEMM03 Principles of Mass Spectrometric Protein Characterization. Exam

Advantages of the LTQ Orbitrap for Protein Identification in Complex Digests

Simultaneous Metabolite Identification and Quantitation with UV Data Integration Using LightSight Software Version 2.2

The Scheduled MRM Algorithm Enables Intelligent Use of Retention Time During Multiple Reaction Monitoring

Introduction to Proteomics 1.0

Error Tolerant Searching of Uninterpreted MS/MS Data

Fast and Automatic Mapping of Disulfide Bonds in a Monoclonal Antibody using SYNAPT G2 HDMS and BiopharmaLynx 1.3

Increasing the Multiplexing of High Resolution Targeted Peptide Quantification Assays

for mass spectrometry calibration tools Thermo Scientific Pierce Controls and Standards for Mass Spectrometry

Tackling the data analysis challenge for characterisation of biotherapeutics

NUVISAN Pharma Services

LC/MS Analysis of the Monoclonal Antibody Rituximab Using the Q Exactive Benchtop Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer

Challenges in Computational Analysis of Mass Spectrometry Data for Proteomics

Choices, choices, choices... Which sequence database? Which modifications? What mass tolerance?

biopharmaceuticals Join the sweet revolution in Thermo Scientific Glycan Analysis for Biotherapeutics

Workshop IIc. Manual interpretation of MS/MS spectra. Ebbing de Jong. Center for Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Phone (612) (612)

Mass Spectra Alignments and their Significance

Retrospective Analysis of a Host Cell Protein Perfect Storm: Identifying Immunogenic Proteins and Fixing the Problem

MultiQuant Software 2.0 for Targeted Protein / Peptide Quantification

Aiping Lu. Key Laboratory of System Biology Chinese Academic Society

Ultra Fast UHPLC-LCMSMS Method Development in Clinical Drug Monitoring

1 Genzyme Corp., Framingham, MA, 2 Positive Probability Ltd, Isleham, U.K.

Novel Glycan Column Technology for the LC-MS Analysis of Labeled and Native N-Glycans Released from Proteins and Antibodies

Pinpointing phosphorylation sites using Selected Reaction Monitoring and Skyline

Learning Objectives:

Session 1. Course Presentation: Mass spectrometry-based proteomics for molecular and cellular biologists

Overview. Triple quadrupole (MS/MS) systems provide in comparison to single quadrupole (MS) systems: Introduction

Global and Discovery Proteomics Lecture Agenda

Mass Spectrometry Based Proteomics

MS/MS analysis of Polyphenols

Simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis using the Agilent 6540 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF

A Fully Integrated Workflow for LC-MS/MS Analysis of Labeled and Native N-Linked Glycans Released From Proteins

impact II Innovation with Integrity Get the full picture the first time UHR-TOF MS

A Streamlined Workflow for Untargeted Metabolomics

La Protéomique : Etat de l art et perspectives

Cliquid ChemoView 3.0 Software Simple automated analysis, from sample to report

ProSightPC 3.0 Quick Start Guide

Proteomics in Practice

Quick and Sensitive Analysis of Multiclass Veterinary Drug Residues in Meat, Plasma, and Milk on a Q Exactive Focus LC-MS System

泛 用 蛋 白 質 體 學 之 質 譜 儀 資 料 分 析 平 台 的 建 立 與 應 用 Universal Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis Platform for Quantitative and Qualitative Proteomics

Introduction to Proteomics

Industry Perspective: Advantages of Open Access and Walkup LC/ MS Supporting Protein Drug Discovery and Development

Using Natural Products Application Solution with UNIFI for the Identification of Chemical Ingredients of Green Tea Extract

Separation of Peptides from Enzymatic Digestion on Different Acclaim Columns: A Comparative Study

Key Words GlycanPac AXH-1, HILIC, WAX, glycomics, glycoproteins, glycopeptides, glycans, labeled N-glycans, Q Exactive, SimGlycan software

MASCOT Search Results Interpretation

LC-MS/MS for Chromatographers

Symbol nomenclature for glycan representation

ProteinPilot Report for ProteinPilot Software

Absolute quantification of low abundance proteins by shotgun proteomics

Improving the Metabolite Identification Process with Efficiency and Speed: LightSight Software for Metabolite Identification

Research-grade Targeted Proteomics Assay Development: PRMs for PTM Studies with Skyline or, How I learned to ditch the triple quad and love the QE

Laboration 1. Identifiering av proteiner med Mass Spektrometri. Klinisk Kemisk Diagnostik

Monoclonal Antibody Characterization Achieving Higher Throughput and Productivity

Automated Method Development Utilizing Software-Based Optimization and Direct Instrument Control

Proteomic Analysis using Accurate Mass Tags. Gordon Anderson PNNL January 4-5, 2005

GENERAL UNKNOWN SCREENING FOR DRUGS IN BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES BY LC/MS Luc Humbert1, Michel Lhermitte 1, Frederic Grisel 2 1

Application Note # MS-14 Fast On-site Identification of Drugs with the mobile GC/MS system E²M

Pep-Miner: A Novel Technology for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics

MRMPilot Software: Accelerating MRM Assay Development for Targeted Quantitative Proteomics

Introduction to mass spectrometry (MS) based proteomics and metabolomics

How To Use An Acquity Qda Detector

Accurate Mass Screening Workflows for the Analysis of Novel Psychoactive Substances

A Navigation through the Tracefinder Software Structure and Workflow Options. Frans Schoutsen Pesticide Symposium Prague 27 April 2015

Investigating Biological Variation of Liver Enzymes in Human Hepatocytes

Overview. Introduction. AB SCIEX MPX -2 High Throughput TripleTOF 4600 LC/MS/MS System

Mass Frontier 7.0 Quick Start Guide

flexanalysis User Manual

Electrospray Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry. Introduction

Exciting Trends in Bioprocessing

Henry Shion, Robert Birdsall, Steve Cubbedge, and Weibin Chen Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA APPLICATION BENEFITS INTRODUCTION WATERS SOLUTIONS

SPE, LC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Ethinyl Estradiol from Human Plasma

Already said. Already said. Outlook. Look at LC-MS data. A look at data for quantitative analysis using MSight and Phenyx. What data for quantitation?

Transcription:

Application Note # LCMS-66 Straightforward N-glycopeptide analysis combining fast ion trap data acquisition with new ProteinScape functionalities Introduction Glycosylation is one of the most common and important post-translational modifications and is found in more than 50% of all eukaryotic proteins, including antibodies, receptors, hormones, and structural proteins. Glycoproteins have diverse functions and are involved in numerous biological processes. Their glycan moieties are either directly involved in regulatory processes or influence physicochemical properties of the glycoprotein. This study focuses on N-glycans, which are covalently bound to asparagine residues. The asparagine is found in the consensus sequence [asparagine] [X] [serine/threonine] where X denotes any amino acid except proline. N-glycans are subdivided into complex, high mannose and hybrid types that share a common trimannose-chitobiose core (Manα1-6(Manα1-3)Manβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-4GlcNAc1-N) (Varki et al. 2008; Figure 1). High mannose type structures consist entirely of mannose units, whereas complex type structures are characterized by a variable number of N- acetyllactosamine (Gal(β1-3/4)GlcNAc(β1-)) antennae and possible additional fucosylation, sialylation, galactosylation and/or a bisecting N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Hybrid type structures are a combination of high mannose and complex type structures. Mass spectrometry (MS) techniques such as MALDI-MS and LC ESI-MS offer analytical solutions for glycopeptide and glycan analysis (Wuhrer et al. 2007). However, due to the large variety of glycan structures present at one glycosylation site, MS analysis of N-glycopeptides is challenging. In addition, the generally lower ionization efficiency of glycopeptides compared to non-glycosylated peptides leads to signal suppression effects. Furthermore, N-glycopeptides have considerably higher masses and therefore higher m/zvalues than non-glycosylated peptides. This means that a combination of high sensitivity, good resolution, fast MS data acquisition and a large accessible mass range is essential for efficient glycopeptide analysis. For this study we elucidated the N-glycosylation pattern of the murine monoclonal antibody MOPC-21, which represents a model analyte for biopharmaceutical applications (Huhn et al. 2009). The MOPC-21 antibody has one N-glycosylation site at asparagine 294 and a highly heterogeneous N-glycan pattern with the typical trimannose-chitobiose core. Additional galactosylation and sialylation of the antennae and core fucosylation has been described (Kontermann & Dübel 2010). Here we demonstrate the beneficial and effective combination of fast ion trap data acquisition (amazon speed ETD) equipped with CaptiveSpray ionization and the new glycoanalysis features of ProteinScape software.

LC settings System Trap column Analytical column Flow rate Gradient Dionex RSLCnano Dionex Acclaim PepMap RSLC, 75 µm x 2 cm, C18, 3 µm, 100 Å Dionex Acclaim PepMap RSLC, 75 µm x 25 cm, C18, 2 µm, 100 Å 300 nl/min 5-30% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid in 60 min Table 1: LC-settings used for separation of N-glycopeptides and non-glycosylated peptides. MS settings Source CaptiveSpray MS conditions Enhanced resolution mode (8100 m/z s -1 ) 400-1700 m/z scan range 200000 ICC target 5 Spectra Averages (2 Rolling Averaging) Target Mass 1200 m/z (CID) MS/MS conditions UltraScan mode (32500 m/z s -1 ) Scan begin 100 m/z scan end 3 x precursor Smart isolation 5 precursor (Active Exclusion after 2 spectra) Fragmentation amplitude: 70% (SmartFrag active) Table 2: MS and MS/MS settings used for aquisition with the amazon speed. Experimental Sample preparation and LC ESI-MS The monoclonal antibody MOPC-21 (Sigma-Aldrich) was reduced, carbamidomethylated and digested with trypsin according to the supplied protocol (Sigma-Aldrich, Technical Bulletin). The tryptic peptides were separated on a Dionex Ultimate 3000 nanorslc system with a Dionex Acclaim PepMap C18 column (see Table 1 for more details). MS experiments were carried out using an amazon speed ETD ion trap system equipped with a CaptiveSpray source (Bruker-Michrom). CID fragmentation experiments were performed in automs n mode using the Enhanced resolution mode for MS and UltraScan mode for MS/MS acquisition. In comparison to peptide analysis, mass ranges in MS and MS/MS mode were enlarged and the fragmentation amplitude was enhanced. Experimental details are given in Table 2. Data processing and glycan identification MS data were processed with DataAnalysis 4.0 using default settings for glycopeptide analysis. The resulting peak lists were classified in ProteinScape 3.0. Glycopeptide spectra were then searched against the Glycome DB database with the integrated search engine GlycoQuest using the parameters listed in Table 3. Results In order to discriminate glycopeptide spectra from those of non-glycosylated peptides, a spectra classification was performed in ProteinScape (cf. Figure 2). Glycan fragment distances and specific low mass signals originating from fragmentation within the glycan moiety so-called oxonium ions were used to classify MS/MS spectra as potential glycopeptide spectra. Furthermore, consecutive glycan fragment distances were used to determine the mass of the peptide backbone for each glycopeptide. The theoretical fragmentation scheme for an N-glycopeptide of the complex type is shown in Figure 3. The corresponding MS/MS spectrum with the annotated oxonium ions and glycan distances is shown in Figure 4. Peptide masses were automatically calculated during the classification workflow from the signal of the peptide plus GlcNAc. The corresponding glycan masses were used for glycan database searches of the classified N-glycopeptide spectra. This resulted in several glycan structure proposals for each MS/MS spectrum.

Parameter Value Submitted to search Only classified spectra Glycan type N-glycan Taxonomy No restriction Database GlycomeDB Composition restriction Hex < 8; HexNAc < 6; NeuAc < 3; Fuc < 1; NeuGc < 3 Derivatization Underivatized Ions H + up to 4, charge permutation 1 to 4 MS tolerance 0.3 Da MS/MS tolerance 0.35 Da # 13 C 1 Fragmentation A, B, Y; max. 2 cleavages; max. 2 cross ring Table 3: GlycoQuest search parameters. An overview of the glycan database search results obtained with ProteinScape is shown in Figure 5. Several different glycan structures with and without core fucosylation, with additional galactosylation and with attached N-glycolylneuraminic acid were identified for the N-glycosylation site at asparagine 294 of MOPC-21. The ten most abundant glycan structures are listed in Table 4. The score for each glycan was calculated from the intensity and the fragmentation coverage. The glycopeptides are chromatographically separated in two groups. The main group around 29.2 min contains N-glycopeptides without N-glycolylneuraminic acid and the second group around 33.6 min contains N-glycopeptides with N-glycolylneuraminic acid. An annotated base peak chromatogram representing the ten most abundant N-glycopeptides is shown in Figure 6. Despite the fact that most of the glycopeptides actually co-elute, the fast MS/MS duty cycle of the amazon speed ETD ion trap enabled high quality MS/MS spectra to be obtained. In addition to the identification of various glycan structures, a protein sequence coverage of around 85% for the MOPC- 21 heavy chain and 90% for the light chain was achieved, even though the LC-MS method was not optimized for nonglycosylated tryptic peptides. N-glycans D-mannose N-acetyl-Dglucosamine D-galactose high-mannose type complex type hybrid type Figure 1: Basic forms of N-linked glycans. The boxes denote the common chitobiose core that is covalently bound to the amide nitrogen of the asparagine residue.

LC-MS/MS data acquisition of glycoprotein digest LC-MS/MS data set Classification GlycoQuest Search Result: Identified glycan moieties and calculated peptide masses Potential glycopeptide spectra E Figure 2: General workflow used for N-glycopeptide characterization by mass spectrometry. EEQFNSTF Rt [min] Composition m/z measured z Δ MH+ [Da] Score 29.34 Hex3HexNAc4dHex1 1301.58 2 0.00 76.8 29.34 Hex3HexNAc3 1127.01 2 0.00 42.8 29.35 Hex3HexNAc3dHex1 1200.03 2-0.02 75.1 28.93 Hex4HexNAc4dHex1 1382.61 2 0.00 77.9 29.09 Hex3HexNAc4 1228.54 2-0.02 85.3 29.14 Hex4HexNAc4 1309.57 2-0.02 79.1 29.35 Hex4HexNAc3 1208.02 2-0.04 72.2 34.21 Hex4HexNAc3NeuGc1 1361.57 2-0.02 23.4 29.54 Hex4HexNAc3dHex1 1281.03 2 0.02 67.9 28.77 Hex5HexNAc4dHex1 1463.61 2-0.04 64.2 Table 4: Overview of the 10 most abundant N-glycopeptides detected for MOPC-21. Theoretical fragmentation scheme Oxonium ions T F N F S X Amino acids GlcNAc Man Gal Glycopeptide fragments Peptide + GlcNAc Q E E Figure 3 : CID fragmentation scheme of an MOPC-21 N-glycopeptide. Monosaccharide symbols are used according to CFG recommendations (CFG URL).

Conclusion The current approach demonstrates the performance of the amazon speed ETD system for the analysis of N-glycosylated peptides. The instrument combines new hardware and software features such as faster precursor isolation and reduced fragmentation time to deliver a significantly faster MS/MS duty cycle compared to the previous platform, providing high quality MS/MS spectra, even from heterogeneous co-eluting glycopeptides. Data processing was performed using ProteinScape 3.0, a sophisticated bioinformatics platform. The workflow comprised classification of N-glycopeptide MS/MS spectra from the LC-MS/MS data set, automatic determination of peptide masses, and glycan database search using the search engine GlycoQuest. This led to the identification of a total of 22 different glycan structures for the glycopeptide from MOPC-21 in one LC-MS/MS run. MS/MS spectrum with the annotated oxonium ions and glycan distances Oxonium ions Glycopeptide fragments Peptide + GlcNAc Intens. 5 x10 2.5 HexNAc Hex Hex Hex HexNAc Hex 2.0 Hex+ HexNAc Hex Hex HexNAc Hex HexNAc 1 + 1360.71 2415.01 1.5 2253.00 1.0 0.5 0.0 366.17 690.24 528.22 893.34 1055.41 1258.54 1887.82 1725.83 1563.82 2049.86 250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500 m/z Figure 4: Ion trap MS/MS spectrum of the doubly charged N-glycopeptide with m/z 1309.57. Oxonium ions and glycan mass distances used for glycopeptide classification are highlighted. The peptide mass is calculated from the signal corresponding to peptide+glcnac. Overview of the glycan database search results Project Navigator Glycan List Fragment Ion List Glycan Structure View Annotated Spectrum Figure 5: GlycoQuest search result of MOPC- 21 tryptic digest in ProteinScape. Project Navigator (upper left), list of identified glycans and their fragments (upper right), spectrum view with annotated fragments (lower right) and Glycan Structure view (lower left) are shown. Fragmentation spectra are annotated according to the nomenclature of Domon & Costello.

Bruker Daltonics is continually improving its products and reserves the right to change specifications without notice. Bruker Daltonics 02-2012, LCMS-66, #284649 The ten most abundant N-glycopeptides Intens. x10 8 4 3 1 2 1 2 0 20 25 30 35 40 45 Time [min] Figure 6: Annotated base peak chromatogram representing the ten most intense glycopeptide precursors linked to the N-glycosylation site N294. References B. Domon and C. Costello; A systematic nomenclature for carbohydrate fragmentations in FAB-MS/MS spectra of glycoconjugates; Glycoconjugate, 5, 397 409 (1988). C. Huhn, M.H. J. Selman, L. Renee Ruhaak, A.M. Deelder, and Manfred Wuhrer; IgG glycosylation analysis; Proteomics, 9, 882 913 (2009). R. Kontermann and S. Dübel (eds.), Antibody Engineering Vol. 1, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010. M. Wuhrer, M.I. Catalina, A.M. Deelder, C.H. Hokke; Glycoproteomics based on tandem mass spectrometry of glycopeptides; J. Chrom. B, 849, 115 128 (2007). Varki, R.D. Cummings, J.D. Esko, H.H. Freeze, P. Stanley, C.R. Bertozzi, G.W. Hart, M.E. Etler; 2008, Essentials of Glycobiology, 2nd edition, CSH press. CFG: http://www.functionalglycomics.org/static/consortium/ Nomenclature.shtml Authors Kristina Neue, Andrea Kiehne, Markus Meyer, Marcus Macht, Ulrike Schweiger-Hufnagel, Anja Resemann Bruker Daltonik GmbH Keywords Instrumentation & Software N-glycosylation amazon speed Glycan structure analysis ProteinScape 3.0 bioinformatics GlycoQuest For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. Bruker Daltonik GmbH Bremen Germany Phone +49 (0)421-2205-0 Fax +49 (0)421-2205-103 sales@bdal.de www.bruker.com/ms Bruker Daltonics Inc. Billerica, MA USA Phone +1 (978) 663-3660 Fax +1 (978) 667-5993 ms-sales@bdal.com Bruker Daltonics Inc. Fremont, CA USA Phone +1 (510) 683-4300 Fax +1 (510) 490-6586 ms-sales@bdal.com