POPULATION DYNAMICS Zoo 511 Ecology of Fishes
Today s goals Understand why and how population dynamics are important in fisheries ecology Gain experience in a variety of mark-recapture methods
What are population dynamics? A population is a group of fish of the same species that are alive in a defined area at a given time (Wootton 1990) Population dynamics: changes in the number of individuals in a population or the vital rates of a population over time
Bluegill catch Rusty catch Major role of ecology: understand change 250 Bluegill Rusty 1400 200 1200 1000 150 800 100 50 0 600 400 200 0
Why study population dynamics? Often most relevant response to ecosystem manipulation/perturbation Endangered species (population viability analysis, PVA) Fisheries management (sustainable yield) Understand ecosystem dynamics and ecological processes
Why study population dynamics? Often most relevant response to ecosystem manipulation/perturbation Endangered species (population viability analysis, PVA) Fisheries management (sustainable yield) Understand ecosystem dynamics and ecological processes Atlantic salmon PVA From Legault 2004 PVA: Modeling the probability that a population will go extinct or drop below the minimum viable population size within a given number of years.
Why study population dynamics? Often most relevant response to ecosystem manipulation/perturbation Endangered species (population viability analysis, PVA) Fisheries management (sustainable yield) Understand ecosystem dynamics and ecological processes from Hilborn and Walters 1992
Why study population dynamics? Often most relevant response to ecosystem manipulation/perturbation Endangered species (population viability analysis, PVA) Fisheries management (sustainable yield) Understand ecosystem dynamics and ecological processes When do ecological shifts occur? Are they stable?
How do populations change? Population
Density Dependence Rate of Change (per capita) Population Density
per capita annual increase Rate of population increase Density independent Density dependent N
Population density Time Population density Time Small group exercise Population starts at low density. What happens to density over time under density-dependent rate of increase? What happens if rate of increase is densityindependent? Density-dependent Density-independent
per capita annual increase Logistic population growth dn/dt=r 0 N(1-N/K) r 0 = maximum rate of increase K= carrying capacity r 0 N K
R-selected vs. K-selected Environment r-selected variable and/or unpredictable K-selected constant and/or predictable Lifespan short long Growth rate fast slow Fecundity high low Natural mortality high low Population dynamics unstable stable
How do populations change? N t+1 = N t + B D + I E Immigration B = births Stocking D = deaths I = immigration Births Population Deaths E = emigration Angling Emigration
Survival Predation Disease Prey availability Competition for food Harvest Age 1 Age 2 Age 3 Year 1 N 1,1 N 1,2 N 1,3 S Year 2 N 2,1 N 2,2 N 2,3 Year 3 N 3,1 N 3,2 N 3,3 Natural Mortality
Survival Eggs and larvae suffer the largest losses Egg HATCH Larva Viable & Competent Recruit! Not Fertile Inviable Starvation Eaten Eaten Other 2 cohorts each produce 10,000,000 eggs 90.5% survivorship/day yields 24,787 survivors at 60 days 95.1% survivorship/day yields 497,871 survivors at 60 days
Recruitment Can mean many things! Number of young-of-year (YOY) fish entering population in a year Number of fish achieving age/size at which they are vulnerable to fishing gear Somewhat arbitrary, varies among populations Major goal of fish population dynamics: understanding the relationship between stock size and recruitment
What determines recruitment? -Stock size (number and size of females)
Recruitment Density-independent Ricker What determines recruitment? Beverton-Holt spawning stock biomass (SSB) From: Wootton (1998). Ecology of teleost fishes.
The problem? Stochasticity!
From: Cushing (1996). Towards a science of recruitment in fish populations
Highly variable recruitment results in naturally very variable catches From: Jennings, Kaiser and Reynolds (2001). Marine Fisheries Ecology
Population Abundance On rare occasions, abundance can be measured directly Small enclosed systems Migration
Catch per unit effort (CPUE) Very coarse and very common index of abundance 1 Catch= 4 fish Effort= 4 nets for 12 hours each= 48 net hours CPUE=4/48=0.083 2 Catch=8 fish Effort= 4 nets for 12 hours each= 48 net hours CPUE=8/48=0.167 We conclude population 2 is 2X larger than population 1
Population abundance Density estimates (#/area) Eggs estimated with quadrats Pelagic larvae sampled with modified plankton nets Juvenile and adult fish with nets, traps, hook and line, or electrofishing Density is then used as index of abundance, or multiplied by habitat area to get abundance estimate
Depletion methods Closed population Vulnerability constant for each pass Collection efficiency constant Often not simple linear regression * N * * * Time (or pass)
Mark recapture M=5 C=4 R=2 N=population size=????
Modified Petersen method Assumptions: Closed population Equal catchability in first sample Marking does NOT influence catchability Marked and unmarked fish mix randomly Mortality rates are equal Marks are not lost
How to avoid violation of assumptions? Two sampling gears Distribute marked individuals widely; allow time for mixing Can be separated into different groups Length Sex Geographic regions
How many to mark/recapture? Requires some knowledge of population size! Trade-off between precision and sample size Population of 10,000: Mark 400 and examine 600 for +/- 50% OR mark 1,000 and examine 1,500 for +/- 10% Trade-off between marked and recapture sample size Population of 10,000: Mark 1,000 and examine1,500 OR Mark 4,500 and examine 500
Schnabel method Closed population Equal catchabilty in first sample Marking does NOT influence catchability Multiple recaptures Easier to pick up on violation of assumptions
Jolly Seber method Open populations Allows estimation of births and deaths Three or more sampling periods needed Equal catchability of all individuals in all samples Equal probability of survival Marks are not lost Sampling time is negligible compared to intervals between samples
Importance of uncertainty Confidence intervals Long-term frequency, not probablity! 95% confidence intervals if you repeated procedure an infinite number of times, 95% of the time the interval you create would contain the true value Precision vs. accuracy x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Accurate, not precise Not accurate, precise Accurate, precise
Lets count some beans!