Percep&on of Online Adver&sing - USA

Similar documents
Children s Media Use and Attitudes Report Section 4 Children s take-up of media

VIDEOGAMES IN EUROPE:

VIDEOGAMES IN EUROPE:

Connect South Carolina 2012 Technology Assessment Of Beaufort, Colleton, Hampton, and Jasper Counties

AUSTRALIAN MULTI-SCREEN REPORT QUARTER

VIDEOGAMES IN EUROPE:

VIDEOGAMES IN EUROPE:

VIDEOGAMES IN EUROPE:

Mobile App A+tudes & Usage and Segmenta7on Research


The Home Network Our Neglected Workhorse. An IDC InfoBrief, sponsored by Linksys May 2015

Fall 2014 LACCD District-wide Student Survey Results - Los Angeles Mission College

Millennial Teens: Non-Conformist Trendsetters

CONSUMER CONNECTIONS IN A CONVERGING WORLD OF SCREENS

89% of Alaska schools see broadband needs rising in the next five years.

The Australian ONLINE CONSUMER LANDSCAPE

Home Computer Access and Internet Use

Premium Advertising Sweden UK France Germany

The Rise of Mobile & Responsive Website Design

AUSTRALIAN MULTI-SCREEN REPORT QUARTER

Understanding women s habits Women s forum - October 13 to 15, 2011

Who Needs Parental Controls?

2012 Survey of K- 12 Educators on Social Networking, Online Communi)es, and Web 2.0 Tools

Expanding the Conversation Leveraging Social Media for Brand Interaction. April Copyright 2013

How To Know What Your Mom Thinks

2014 Vermont Residential Telecommunications Survey Report

General. information. about our study

Evolving Behaviors In Mobile Banking May Kasisto, Inc.

include any products or devices supplied by an employer, unless you also use them for personal use. 98% 49% 93% 80% 85% 93% 77% 98% 98% 53% 62%

UK children s media literacy

Mobile Marketing Survey Report Q1 2014

Texas WIC Nutrition Education Survey Local Agency 067 Report June 2014

Adults Media Use and Attitudes Report 2014

Demographic Profile of Wichita Unemployment Insurance Beneficiaries Q3 2015

SPECIAL THANKS TO Two things to keep in mind when

Digital Democracy Survey A multi-generational view of consumer technology, media and telecom trends

THE MOBILE INTERNET CONSUMER INDIA 2013 AUDIENCE INSIGHTS ON MOBILE WEB AND APP USERS

An Analysis of Twitter Users vs. Non-Users. An Insight Report Presentation Using DeepProfile Micro-Segmentation January 2014

2011 Cell Phone Consumer Attitudes Study

Dentsu Innovation Institute Survey Comparing the Actual Usage of Tablet Devices in Japan and the US

St. Elizabeth Seton Catholic Church. Carmel, IN. Elementary School Feasibility Survey

INTERNET USAGE BY HOUSEHOLDS AND INDIVIDUALS, 2011 ONLINE SURVEY

Broadband and e-government Usage Survey. Presented through a Partnership Between Connect Alaska and The Association of Alaska School Boards

Clarity Middle School Survey

Factsheet 6 Ownership of media devices and services. Ofcom Oxford Media Convention 2 March 2016

ecommerce in Indonesia August 2012

California State Assembly Committee on Arts, Entertainment, Sports, Tourism and Internet Media

Demographic Profile of Wichita Unemployment Insurance Beneficiaries Q2 2014

Youth Online Behavior

EUROPE ERICSSON MOBILITY REPORT


Generational differences

Oregon Broadband Adoption

- CABLEVISION SURVEY QUESTIONS - 1 Do you make the decisions or share in making the decisions in your household for cable TV service?

High School Juniors Views on Free Enterprise and Entrepreneurship: A Na<onal Survey

Research Overview. Mobile Gamer Profile. Mobile Game Play Device Usage. Mobile Game Play Activity. Mobile Gaming Purchase Behavior.

The Cisco Connected World Technology Report

Speak Up 2015 School Site Administrator Survey

Wealthy Consumers and Real Estate

THE EAST CENTRAL INDIANA WESTERN SECTOR AREA LABOR AVAILABILITY REPORT

Main Research Gaps in Cyber Security

65% of internet users have paid for online content

Chapter 1 Basic Introduction to Computers. Discovering Computers Your Interactive Guide to the Digital World

For more information regarding the survey findings, visit TOTAL

SPIEGEL ONLINE. Not afraid of the truth.

Social Media Usage Among Adults

Racing Toward a Complete Digital Lifestyle: Digital Consumers Crave More

Why TV? Internet Most Internet users now have access to broadband connection that allows for richer content and a more enjoyable experience

Computer and Internet Usage Questionnaire

Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey 2014

Appendix A Urbana Free Library Survey Response Frequencies

TO MAXIMIZE YOUR REVENUE

ES Results June 2012

OWNERSHIP, ACCESS AND USE OF COMPUTERS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND OTHER E-TECHNOLOGIES BY STUDENTS IN SUBURBAN BEIJING SCHOOLS

Birth to Three, Then What?: Early Interventions role in the inclusion of children with Down syndrome

How People Use Audio and Sports Radio

Google TV - Searching for Success. a Parks Associates white paper June 2010

Dr. Joseph Straubhaar Dr. Wenhong Chen Jeremiah Spence Teresa Correa Dr. Nádie Machado-Spence

Teens, Online Stranger Contact and Cyberbullying What the research is telling us

DIGITAL VIDEO BENCHMARK ADOBE DIGITAL INDEX Q2 2015

How To Use Social Media In Australia

5/15/2014. A Look at Mobile Device Usage Among College Students Shimon Sarraf Jennifer Brooks James Cole. Introduction & Purpose

Library ebook Survey hosted by OverDrive

Select the occupation that best represents the job you were laid off:

Clarity High School Student Survey

were weighted to correct for variance in the likelihood of selection for a given case and to balance the sample to

Internet Connectivity and the Digital Divide in California Households: 2015

Consumer Attitude Towards the Cell Phone: A study on Young Generations of Chittagong Metropolitan City, Bangladesh

BROADBAND ADOPTION MARKET RESEARCH

INDUSTRY OVERVIEW. The information set forth in this section has been derived from various government and private publications.

MOBILE AD RECEPTIVENESS, ENGAGEMENT, AND ACTION

Psychology Occupation Report CIP

Media Production Arts Occupation Report CIP

Adults media use and attitudes report

What Do Our Data Tell Us: Two Reports Examining Correla;ons in Utah Data

Cell Phone Activities 2013

Simple solutions in a maze of options. Print Digital SEM Online Banner Mobile Consulting 2015 MEDIA KIT

Chef Garde Manger/Sous Chef Apprentice Occupation Report CIP

Fort Hays State University

Transcription:

Study: Percep&on of Online Adver&sing - USA Comparison of 13 different forms of online adver4sing Report 1

Contents 1 Methodology - Overview 4 Level of Disrup4on Direct Ques4ons 2 Adver4sing Form under Examina4on 5 Level of Disrup4on Calcula4on 3 Online behavior 6 Demography 2

1 Methodology - Overview 3

Methodology - Overview Background and Objec&ves Method Target Group Sample Eyeo s aim is to evaluate the percep4on of 13 different kind of online adver4sing formats from the internet users point of view. The survey was carried out as an online ad hoc study based upon a quota sample represen4ng the online popula4on. Interviews were conducted by self- comple4on ques4onnaires. A representa4ve sample based on age, gender and region was drawn from the basic popula4on. Field 4me: 11 to 24 November 215 A total of 2, English- speaking residnts (aged 16 to 75) of the USA who are contactable by Internet were interviewed. 4

2 Adver&sing Form under Examina&on 5

Adver&sing Forms under Examina&on: Ad Banner Ad Banner Conserva4ve Ad Banner A\en4on Grabbing Ad Banner Animated Banner Ad Banner All Around 6

Adver&sing Forms under Examina&on: Pop- up and Video Ad Pop- up Video Ad Unskippable Video 7

Adver&sing Forms under Examina&on: Text Ad Below Between Next To 8

Adver&sing Forms under Examina&on: Na&ve Ad and Search Ad Na4ve Ad subtle Na4ve Tweets Search Ad High Quan4ty Search Ad Low Quan4ty 9

3 Online Behavior 1

Online Usage and Usage of Devices In the US almost all respondents are at least once a in the internet and about one quarter of this all day long. The most used device is a laptop or a smartphone Online Usage Usage of Devices Main Device Used 26. All day Laptop Internet- capable phone or smartphone 58 67 39 16 15. About half a day Desktop PC (with separate screen) 57 36 11 47.7 11..3 Several 4mes a day About once a day Less than once a week Tablet Game console (e.g. xbox, Playsta4on) Internet- capable television, receiver, or blu- ray player Hybrid devices such as laptop and tablet in one device With none of the listed devices Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on OA1: How oeen do you go on the Internet? Ques4on OA2: Some devices that you can use to access the Internet are on the list. Which of these devices do you use to access the Internet - regardless if for work or private purposes? Ques4on OA3: What is the device that you use the most to access the Internet, regardless if for work or private purposes? 1 8 16 16 39 2-3 devices on average 2 4 6 8 1 5

4 Level of Disrup&on Direct Ques&ons 12

Overall Assessment of Online Adver&sing About 45% of the par&cipants surveyed found this online adver&sing disprup&ve or very. About 15% are hardly disturbed (1) for me online adver4sing isn't disrup4ve (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) for me online adver4sing disrup4ve 3.7 1.2 15.8 25. 25.3 19.9 Top- 2- Boxes 13.9% Bo[om- 2- Boxes 45.3% 13 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R1: Please take a moment to think of online adver4sing and the different types of online adver4sing that you come across on the Internet. How would you rate online adver4sing in general in comparison to adver4sing on television, in the movie theater, and in newspapers? On this scale 1 means for me online adver4sing isn't disrup4ve " and 6 means "for me online adver4sing disrup4ve".

Level of Disrup&on - Ranking of all Forms - Overview 2.5 32.1 19.9 Ad Banner - Conservar4ve 25.1 Between 46. 78.1 Low Quan4ty Below Video Ad - Unskippable video Pop- up High Quan4ty 2.8 Ad Banner A\en4on Grabbing 23.8 Hidden Na4ve 44.1 Ad Banner Animated Banner 69.6 1 14 Next To 23.7 subtle Na4ve Tweets 26.1 Ad Banner - All Around 68. Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R2: Next you will be shown different pictures of a website. The content of the website is the same in each picture. On each page, however, you will see different types of adver4sing. For each type of adver4sing shown, please indicate the level of disrup4on. Data: Bo\om- 2- Boxes

Level of Disrup&on in Detail Bo[om- 2- Boxes (1/3) Most are Pop- up, Animated Banner and Ad Banner (all around) Adver&sments Pop- up Ad Banner - Animated Banner Ad Banner - All Around Video Ad - Unskippable video 78.1 69.6 68. 46. 15 1 1 1 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R2: Next you will be shown different pictures of a website. The content of the website is the same in each picture. On each page, however, you will see different types of adver4sing. For each type of adver4sing shown, please indicate the level of disrup4on. Data: Bo\om- 2- Boxes 1

Level of Disrup&on in Detail Bo[om- 2- Boxes (2/3) Mean values were reached by na&ve ads and Text Ad (between/ below) Na4ve Ad Between subtle Na4ve Tweets Below 44.1 32.1 26.1 25.1 16 1 1 1 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R2: Next you will be shown different pictures of a website. The content of the website is the same in each picture. On each page, however, you will see different types of adver4sing. For each type of adver4sing shown, please indicate the level of disrup4on. Data: Bo\om- 2- Boxes 1

Level of Disrup&on in Detail Bo[om- 2- Boxes (3/3) Compara&vely low is the level of disrup&on for Search Ad, Text Ad (next to) and Ad Banner (Conserva&ve and A[en&on Grabbing) Ad Banner A\en4on Grabbing Next to Search Ad High Quan4ty Ad Banner Conserva4ve Low Quan4ty 23.8 23.7 2.8 2.5 19.9 17 1 1 1 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R2: Next you will be shown different pictures of a website. The content of the website is the same in each picture. On each page, however, you will see different types of adver4sing. For each type of adver4sing shown, please indicate the level of disrup4on. Data: Bo\om- 2- Boxes 1 1

Level of Disrup&on Bo[om- 2- Boxes The bo[om- 2- box indicates the level of disrup&on 8 7 78.1 69.6 68. 6 5 46. 44.1 4 32.1 3 2 26.1 25.1 23.8 23.7 2.8 2.5 19.9 1 Pop- up Ad Animated Banner All Around Video Ad - Unskippable video Hidden Na4ve Ad Between subtle Tweets Below A\en4on Grabbing Next To High Quan4ty Conserva4ve Low Quan4ty 18 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R2: Next you will be shown different pictures of a website. The content of the website is the same in each picture. On each page, however, you will see different types of adver4sing. For each type of adver4sing shown, please indicate the level of disrup4on. Data: Bo\om- 2- Boxes

4 Level of Disrup&on - Calcula&on 19

Level of Disrup&on - Calcula&on A score per respondent and adver&sing forms was calculated The calcula4on is based on different scaled ques4ons as follows: Ques4on R1: Overall assessment of online adver4sing Ques4on R2: Level of disturbance (All adver4sing forms successively) Ques4on R3: Ranking of the adver4sing forms (Compara4vely tes4ng of the adver4sing forms) Ques4on R4: Level of Disturbance (Test of selected adver4sing forms depending on response behavior in ques4on R3) The score indicates the level of disrup&on. Possible is a value area from (=isn't ) to 1 (=very ). 1 2

Level of Disrup&on - Ranking of all Forms - Overview 15.1 26.5 13. Ad Banner - Conservar4ve 19.4 Between 34.7 5.5 Low Quan4ty Below Video Ad - Unskippable video Pop- up Next To 15.8 subtle Na4ve Tweets 22.1 Hidden Na4ve 32.7 Ad Banner - All Around 53.5 1 21 High Quan4ty 16.9 Ad Banner A\en4on Grabbing 2.3 Ad Banner Animated Banner Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R1: Overall Assessment of Online Adver4sing; Ques4on R2: Level of Disturbance (All Adver4sing Forms) 46.8 Ques4on R3: Ranking of the Adver4sing Forms; Ques4on R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Adver4sing Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per adver4sing form calculated from Ques4ons R1 to R4, value area from (irrelevant) to 1 (=very disrup4ve) possible

Level of Disrup&on in Detail (1/3) Most are Pop- up, Animated Banner and Ad Banner (all around) Adver&sments Ad Banner - All Around Pop- up Ad Banner - Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video 53.5 5.5 46.8 34.7 22 1 1 1 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R1: Overall Assessment of Online Adver4sing; Ques4on R2: Level of Disturbance (All Adver4sing Forms) Ques4on R3: Ranking of the Adver4sing Forms; Ques4on R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Adver4sing Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per adver4sing form calculated from Ques4ons R1 to R4, value area from (irrelevant) to 1 (=very disrup4ve) possible 1

Level of Disrup&on in Detail (2/3) Mean values were reached by na&ve ads, Text Ad (between) and Ad Banner (A[ent. Grab.) Na4ve Ad Between subtle Na4ve Tweets Ad Banner A\en4on Grabbing 32.7 26.5 22.1 2.3 23 1 1 1 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R1: Overall Assessment of Online Adver4sing; Ques4on R2: Level of Disturbance (All Adver4sing Forms) Ques4on R3: Ranking of the Adver4sing Forms; Ques4on R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Adver4sing Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per adver4sing form calculated from Ques4ons R1 to R4, value area from (irrelevant) to 1 (=very disrup4ve) possible 1

Level of Disrup&on in Detail (3/3) Compara&vely low is the level of disrup&on for Text Ad, Ad Banner Conserva&ve and Search Ad Below Search Ad High Quan4ty Next To Ad Banner Conserva4ve Low Quan4ty 19.4 16.9 15.8 15.1 13. 1 1 1 1 1 24 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R1: Overall Assessment of Online Adver4sing; Ques4on R2: Level of Disturbance (All Adver4sing Forms) Ques4on R3: Ranking of the Adver4sing Forms; Ques4on R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Adver4sing Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per adver4sing form calculated from Ques4ons R1 to R4, value area from (irrelevant) to 1 (=very disrup4ve) possible

Level of Disrup&on Average Values of the Score The score indicates the level of disrup&on 8 7 6 5 53.5 5.5 46.8 4 3 2 34.7 32.7 26.5 22.1 2.3 19.4 16.9 15.8 15.1 13. 1 Ad Banner - All Around Pop- up Ad Banner - Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video Hidden Na4ve Ad Between subtle Na4ve Tweets Ad Banner - A\en4on Grabbing Below High Quan4ty Next To Ad Banner - Conserva4ve Low Quan4ty 25 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R1: Overall Assessment of Online Adver4sing; Ques4on R2: Level of Disturbance (All Adver4sing Forms) Ques4on R3: Ranking of the Adver4sing Forms; Ques4on R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Adver4sing Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per adver4sing form calculated from Ques4ons R1 to R4, value area from (irrelevant) to 1 (=very disrup4ve) possible

Level of Disrup&on Median of the Score The score indicates the level of disrup&on 8 7 6 58. 54.8 5 46.3 4 3 2 23.1 19.2 14.9 1 9. 8.8 7.5 5.3 4.4 4.2 2.6 Ad Banner - All Around Pop- up Ad Banner - Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video Hidden Na4ve Ad Between Ad Banner - A\en4on Grabbing subtle Na4ve Tweets Below High Quan4ty Next To Ad Banner - Conserva4ve Low Quan4ty 26 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R1: Overall Assessment of Online Adver4sing; Ques4on R2: Level of Disturbance (All Adver4sing Forms) Ques4on R3: Ranking of the Adver4sing Forms; Ques4on R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Adver4sing Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per adver4sing form calculated from Ques4ons R1 to R4, value area from (irrelevant) to 1 (=very disrup4ve) possible

Top Ad Top- Ad: Percentage share of adver&sing forms that disrupt most in the individual case 8 7 6 5 4 3 33.5 29.2 2 1 1.9 1.1 6.9 2.4 2.1 1.6 1.1.8.8.4.2 Pop- up Ad All Around Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video Hidden Na4ve Ad High Quan4ty subtle Tweets Between Next To A\en4on Grabbing Below Low Quan4ty Conserva4ve 27 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R1: Overall Assessment of Online Adver4sing; Ques4on R2: Level of Disturbance (All Adver4sing Forms) Ques4on R3: Ranking of the Adver4sing Forms; Ques4on R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Adver4sing Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per adver4sing form calculated from Ques4ons R1 to R4, value area from (irrelevant) to 1 (=very disrup4ve) possible

Very Disrup&ve Disrup&ve impact: Frequency of each of adver&sing form with a score greater than 9 in the individual case 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 18. 14.3 1. 9. 6.6 4.2 3. 2.2 2.1 2. 1.9 1.5 1.3 All Around Pop- up Ad Animated Banner Video Ad - Unskippable video Hidden Na4ve Ad subtle Tweets Between A\en4on Grabbing High Quan4ty Below Next To Low Quan4ty Conserva4ve 28 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R1: Overall Assessment of Online Adver4sing; Ques4on R2: Level of Disturbance (All Adver4sing Forms) Ques4on R3: Ranking of the Adver4sing Forms; Ques4on R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Adver4sing Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per adver4sing form calculated from Ques4ons R1 to R4, value area from (irrelevant) to 1 (=very disrup4ve) possible

Not Irrelevant: Frequency of each of adver&sing form with a score less than 5 in the individual case 8 7 6 5 4 3 6.7 52.7 51.9 49.1 42. 4.4 39.9 32.1 26.7 24.6 2 1 15.3 13.9 1.5 Low Quan4ty Conserva4ve Next To High Quan4ty subtle Tweets Below A\en4on Grabbing Between Hidden Na4ve Ad Video Ad - Unskippable video Animated Banner Pop- up Ad All Around 29 Base: All respondents n=2., Results in % Ques4on R1: Overall Assessment of Online Adver4sing; Ques4on R2: Level of Disturbance (All Adver4sing Forms) Ques4on R3: Ranking of the Adver4sing Forms; Ques4on R4: Level of Disturbance (Selected Adver4sing Forms) Scores: Average of the individual scores per adver4sing form calculated from Ques4ons R1 to R4, value area from (irrelevant) to 1 (=very disrup4ve) possible

6 Demography 3

Demography Values in percent Gender (S1) Total Male 52 Female 48 Age (S2) Total 16-34 years 33 35-54 years 38 55 and older 3 Life stages (D1) Living alone/ own household Living with partner/ one household Living with family (partner and child/children) Living with child/ children (single parent) Sharing a household with friends/ roommates Living with parents/ not have own household Total 22 29 27 4 5 12 Yearly Net Household Income (D3) Total bis zu $ 4.999 7 $ 5.- 14.999 8 $ 15.- 24.999 7 $ 25.- 34.999 1 $ 35.- 44.999 1 $ 45.- 54.999 1 $ 55.- 74.999 15 $ 75.- 124.999 19 $ 125.+ 7 No answer 8 Educa4onal Level (D2) Total Online Usage (OA1) Total Elementary school and below High school diploma or GED High school diploma with SAT/ACT score University degree (bachelor, master, PhD) 6 21 21 52 All day Several 4mes/ half a day Once a day Less 26 63 9 3 31