PFC/JA-92-5. MIT Fusion 7-Ray Diagnostic Development. K. W. Wenzel, R. D. Petrasso, D. H. Lo, C. K. Li,



Similar documents
ORTEC AN34 Experiment 7 High-Resolution Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy

Tutorial 4.6 Gamma Spectrum Analysis

Gamma Ray Detection at RIA

EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS FOR CROSS SECTION MEASUREMENTS FOR ANALYTICAL PURPOSES. L. Csedreki 1. Abstract. I. Introduction

Introduction to Geiger Counters

Nuclear ZPE Tapping. Horace Heffner May 2007

Neutron Detection Setups proposed for

PoS(NIC XIII)084. Nuclear GANIL. Francois de Oliveira GANIL, Bd H. Becquerel, Caen oliveira@ganil.fr

Gamma and X-Ray Detection

Radioactivity III: Measurement of Half Life.

Introduction to the Monte Carlo method

The accurate calibration of all detectors is crucial for the subsequent data

Nuclear Physics. Nuclear Physics comprises the study of:

Measurement of Germanium Detector Efficiency

Chapter NP-5. Nuclear Physics. Nuclear Reactions TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES 1.0 NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2.0 NEUTRON INTERACTIONS

1090 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, VOL. 50, NO. 4, AUGUST Intelligent Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Using 3-D Position-Sensitive Detectors

GAMMA-RAY SPECTRA REFERENCES

Radiation Detection and Measurement

Gamma Rays OBJECT: READINGS: APPARATUS: BACKGROUND:

Experiment 10. Radioactive Decay of 220 Rn and 232 Th Physics 2150 Experiment No. 10 University of Colorado

CHEM 1411 Chapter 5 Homework Answers

Objectives 404 CHAPTER 9 RADIATION

A Comparison of an HPGe-based and NaI-based Radionuclide Identifier (RID) for Radioactive Materials

The Mainz LXe TPC MC simulations for a Compton scattering experiment

An Innovative Method for Dead Time Correction in Nuclear Spectroscopy

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

[2] At the time of purchase of a Strontium-90 source, the activity is Bq.

Characteristics of an Integrated Germanium Detector Based Gamma-Ray Spectrometer for Monitoring Systems

Charge exchange stripping cell measurements over a wide pressure range. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831

F321 THE STRUCTURE OF ATOMS. ATOMS Atoms consist of a number of fundamental particles, the most important are... in the nucleus of an atom

Characterization of excited states of 15 N through 14 C(p,p) 14 C using polarized proton beam

GRETA. I-Yang Lee. For the GRETA Steering Committee. Workshop on the Experimental Equipment for RIA March 18-22, 2003, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

The AGATA campaign at GSI. Zsolt Podolyák University of Surrey

Neutral Beam Injection Experiments in the MST Reversed Field Pinch

Atomic and Nuclear Physics Laboratory (Physics 4780)

Basics of Nuclear Physics and Fission

ORTEC. Fast-Timing Discriminator Introduction. Choosing the Right Timing Discriminator for the Application. Counting

ENERGY PER PHOTOELECTRON IN A COINCIDENCE LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTER AS A FUNCTION OF ELECTRON ENERGY. Donald L. Horrocks

Nuclear Structure. particle relative charge relative mass proton +1 1 atomic mass unit neutron 0 1 atomic mass unit electron -1 negligible mass

thermal history of the universe and big bang nucleosynthesis

Status Report of the Gerda Phase II Startup

Electronics GRETINA Project

Basic Nuclear Concepts

Measurement and Simulation of Electron Thermal Transport in the MST Reversed-Field Pinch

Waste Management 04 Conference, February 29 - March 4, 2004, Tucson, AZ Copyright WM Symposia, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted with permission.

For convenience, we may consider an atom in two parts: the nucleus and the electrons.

INFO-0545 RADIOISOTOPE SAFETY MONITORING FOR RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINATION

Chapter 8. Low energy ion scattering study of Fe 4 N on Cu(100)

A Digital Spectrometer Approach to Obtaining Multiple Time-Resolved Gamma-Ray. Spectra for Pulsed Spectroscopy. W. K. Warburton a

Main properties of atoms and nucleus

PHYA5/1. General Certificate of Education Advanced Level Examination June Unit 5 Nuclear and Thermal Physics Section A

Neutron Resonance Spectroscopy for the Characterisation of Materials and Objects

Chapter 1: Moles and equations. Learning outcomes. you should be able to:

Spectral distribution from end window X-ray tubes

Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission

Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity

Vacuum Evaporation Recap

CALCULATION METHODS OF X-RAY SPECTRA: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

A VERSATILE COUNTER FOR CONVERSION MÖSSBAUER SPECTROSCOPY

Compact multichannel neutral particle analyzer for measurement of energetic charge-exchanged neutrals in Alcator C-Mod

Qualitätsmanagement-Handbuch

Public Policy 290 Homeland Security / Cyber Security. Fall US program to address nuclear terrorism threats:

13C NMR Spectroscopy

Cross section, Flux, Luminosity, Scattering Rates

5. The Nature of Light. Does Light Travel Infinitely Fast? EMR Travels At Finite Speed. EMR: Electric & Magnetic Waves

PROSPECT: Precision Reactor Oscillation and Spectrum experiment

Nuclear Reaction and Structure Databases of the National Nuclear Data Center

Activitity (of a radioisotope): The number of nuclei in a sample undergoing radioactive decay in each second. It is commonly expressed in curies

CryoEDM A Cryogenic Neutron-EDM Experiment. Collaboration: Sussex University, RAL, ILL, Kure University, Oxford University Hans Kraus

The Physics of Energy sources Nuclear Fusion

Light as a Wave. The Nature of Light. EM Radiation Spectrum. EM Radiation Spectrum. Electromagnetic Radiation

Measurement of Muon Lifetime and Mass Using Cosmic Ray Showers

Overview of Nuclear Detection Needs for Homeland Security. Abstract

A Review of Emerging Gamma Detector Technologies for Airborne. Radiation Monitoring

* Present address: Department of Physics, Clark University, Worcester, MA

Modification of Pd-H 2 and Pd-D 2 thin films processed by He-Ne laser

Medical Applications of radiation physics. Riccardo Faccini Universita di Roma La Sapienza

EDS system. CRF Oxford Instruments INCA CRF EDAX Genesis EVEX- NanoAnalysis Table top system

Testing of Kaonetics Devices at BNL

KE A = PE MAX 1/2M v 2 = k q1 q2 /R

Atoms and Elements. Outline Atoms Orbitals and Energy Levels Periodic Properties Homework

ENERGY LOSS OF ALPHA PARTICLES IN GASES

Ionizing Radiation, Czech Republic, CMI (Czech Metrology Institute)

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

Structure and Properties of Atoms

Unit 1 Practice Test. Matching

ASACUSA: Measuring the Antiproton Mass and Magnetic Moment

Laboratory Technologies, Inc. Multi-Wiper. Time Saving Multiple Detector Wipe Counter

Solar Energy Production

Production of X-rays. Radiation Safety Training for Analytical X-Ray Devices Module 9

POSSIBL-E EXPERIMENTS ON THE 200-GeV ACCELERATOR. A. D. Krisch University of Michigan. R. Serber Columbia University.

Lecture 2 Macroscopic Interactions Neutron Interactions and Applications Spring 2010

Chemistry 1000 Lecture 2: Nuclear reactions and radiation. Marc R. Roussel

THE STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA 1

Development of Radiation Resistant Quadrupoles Based on High Temperature Superconductors for the Fragment Separator

Time Dependent Radiation Transport in CHNOLOGY Hohlraums Using Integral Transport Methods

arxiv:nucl-ex/ v2 18 Jul 2005

ABSORPTION OF BETA AND GAMMA RADIATION

ON-STREAM XRF ANALYSIS OF HEAVY METALS AT PPM CONCENTRATIONS

1. In the general symbol cleus, which of the three letters. 2. What is the mass number of an alpha particle?

Transcription:

PFC/JA-92-5 MIT Fusion 7-Ray Diagnostic Development K. W. Wenzel, R. D. Petrasso, D. H. Lo, C. K. Li, J. W. Coleman, J. R. Lierzer, E. Hsieht and T. Bernatt Submitted for publication in: Review of Scientific Inatruments Plasma Fusion Center Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139 f Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, CA 94550 This work was supported in part by U.S. DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-91ER54109 and LLNL Subcontract No. B116798.

MIT Fusion y-ray Diagnostic Development K. W. Wenzelt, R. D. Petrasso, D. H. Lot, C. K. Li, J. W. Coleman, and J. R. Lierzer, MIT Plasma Fusion Center, Cambridge MA 02139 E. Hsieh and T. Bernat Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore CA 94550 March 1992 Abstract In conjunction with -y-ray diagnostic development for the NOVA Upgrade and Alcator C-MOD experiments, we have assembled a comprehensive set of absolutely-calibrated -y-ray sources and several y-ray detectors. These tools will be used in characterizing and calibrating new y-ray diagnostic systems as they are assembled. The 7-ray sources comprise both radioisotopes and nuclear reactions. The latter are generated in the MIT Cockcroft-Walton fusion-product generator. The detectors include several "standard" NaI(Tl) scintillators and a high-resolution germanium detector. This paper briefly discusses the diagnostics planned for NOVA Upgrade and Alcator C-MOD. In addition it describes the 7-ray sources and detector characterizations we have performed in the laboratory. 1

I. Introduction -ray diagnostics have certain advantages over other fusion-product diagnostics, because -y rays escape the fusion plasma and its vacuum vessel without suffering significant scattering. Charged particles, by contrast, are largely confined in the plasma, and neutrons are scattered by the surrounding structure. Thus the -y-ray branches of fusion reactions provide a unique opportunity to measure the fusion yield and the fusion burn history. We are developing 7-ray diagnostics for the NOVA Upgrade ICF experiment and the Alcator C-MOD tokamak experiment. The primary objectives are measurements of the 7-ray yields from the T(D,y)"He and 3 He(D,-y) Li reactions at 16.7 MeV and 16.4 MeV, respectively. Since the y-ray branching ratios are known (though small; see Table 1),4' a measurement of the y-ray yield is also a measure of the total fusion-reaction yield. The Y emissions from the "mirror" D-T and D- 3 He reactions are nearly identical, because the nuclear force is charge symmetric, and the product "He and "Li nuclei have similar energy levels with very broad first excited states. 4 Section II below describes the concepts for the NOVA Upgrade and Alcator C-MOD 7-ray diagnostics. In order to successfully develop these diagnostics, we have established a comprehensive set of y-ray sources and detectors. The sources, both radioisotopes and nuclear reactions, provide y rays of known intensity over an energy range of 0.1 MeV to 17 MeV and are described in Section III. The detectors 2

include scintillation detectors and a high-resolution, High-Purity Germanium (HPGe) crystal, and they are described in Section IV. Together, these tools will be used to fully characterize and calibrate new -y-ray detection systems. II. -y-ray Diagnostics for NOVA Upgrade and Alcator C-MOD Measurement of the high-energy D-T y rays in the NOVA Upgrade experiment is the only practical way to determine the fusion burn history. The other fusion products cannot be accurately used for this purpose; the neutrons are significantly Doppler broadened, and the charged particles are stopped in the high-density target plasma. Since the burn width in the NOVA Upgrade experiment will be short (- 500 ps), the D-T -y rays can easily be separated from the neutrons because of their disparate arrival times at the detector. Table 2 illustrates this by listing several pertinent times for a detector at distance d from the target: the 14 MeV neutron arrival time at the detector; the spread (FWHM) in neutron arrival times due to energy Doppler broadening (AE ~ 177 T 1 (kev) calculated for a 10 kev ion temperature using the formula of Brysk 7 ); and the -- ray arrival time at the detector. The y rays have essentially zero Doppler broadening. For this measurement we have proposed either a -y-to-pair-to-cerenkov spectrometer or a -y-to-pair spectrometer with high time resolution (~ 20 ps). The former diagnostic is similar in spirit to that attempted by Lerche, et a0.. An unwanted "background" of -y rays may be generated by the 14 MeV neutrons undergoing inelastic (n,n'y) reactions in the hohlraum, target, 3

and stem. (In high Z materials, the (n,n'y) cross sections are typically about 2 orders of magnitude higher than (n,-y) cross sections.) It is essential to understand this contribution to the y-ray signal, which might amplify the burn signal but would make an absolute D-T yield calibration impossible. In the case of the Alcator C-MOD tokamak, a -y-ray diagnostic for measuring the high-energy -y rays from D-*He reactions does not require the fast time response needed for the NOVA Upgrade diagnostic, because the pulse is much longer (- 1 s). Neither does it require the superior energy resolution of germanium detectors, because the y-ray spectrum is naturally quite broad. (The 16.4-MeV -y is ~1.5 MeV wide.') Therefore we plan to deploy a "standard", large (6" x 6") NaI(Tl) scintillation spectrometer on Alcator C-MOD to measure the absolute D- 3 He reaction yield. This information will complement active (SBD 9 ) and passive (activationo and track detectors) charged-particle diagnostics. In the Alcator C-MOD experiment, capture of 2.5 MeV D-D neutrons in the structure will generate a considerable background of -y rays. Shielding against these lower-energy -y rays and against the neutrons will be crucial. We are designing a suitable shield, and once it is assembled we will test its performance using our Cockcroft-Walton fusion-product generator 1, which is a well-calibrated source of 2.5 MeV D-D neutrons. III. -y-ray Sources We use many different -f-emitting radioactive isotopes in our laboratory 4

as calibration standards. The most useful are 22 Na, 137CS, 5 4 Mn, and 6*Co, because they emit only single -y lines or well-separated lines that are easily resolved by standard Nal(Tl) scintillation detectors. Other sources (e.g. 1'3Ba and 22 0Ra) emit many 7-ray lines that can be resolved only with the HPGe detector. The sources listed above are limited to 7-rays below 3 MeV, far below the ~16.5 MeV lines from D-He and D-T reactions. Therefore we have also used an 24 Am/Be neutron source as an absolute source of 4.44-MeV y rays. These are generated by the reaction 9 Be(a, n) 1 2 0*, where the 12C* nucleus is in the first excited state, which decays by 4.44 MeV 7-ray emission. We calculated the y-ray intensity from this source using the 24 1 Am activity (10 mci), the number of a-"be reactions per 24 'Am a decay, and the fraction of reactions that produce the 120* first excited state. The second quantity is n/a c 7 x 10-5,12 and the third quantity (R,) was calculated from the yields of each 120 final state (0, 1, and 2). These yields were calculated using the cross sections of Ref. 12, and taking into account a-particle slowing down in beryllium using the stopping-power formulas of Ziegler 13. The final result was R,=0.57, in good agreement with the measured value of 0.591.14 Using R,=0.57 gives an absolute intensity of 4 x 10" y rays per a decay. Because the 120* nucleus is extremely short lived (61 fs) 1, the 4.44-MeV 7 ray is quite broad. We therefore fit the measured spectrum to a function based on the physics of the 7-ray interaction in order to accurately determine 5

the total peak counts for an absolute efficiency measurement (Fig. 1). In order to test our -y-ray detectors at even higher energies, we use several nuclear reactions in our Cockcroft-Walton fusion-product generator 1 (see Table 1). Of particular interest to us is the 1 'B(p,-y) C reaction, which yields -y rays at 4.44, 11.5, and 16 MeV. The thick-target 7-ray branching ratios for "B(p,y) 12 C have been measured 15, so by measuring the corresponding a particles from the 'B(p,a)aBe reaction we establish the "B(p,y) 12 C reaction as a high-energy 7-ray source of well-known absolute intensity. Fig. 2 shows the p-"b 7-ray spectrum measured with a 3" x 3" NaI(Tl) detector while a pressed boron target was bombarded with a 170-kV, 25-IA proton beam (inset shows the a-particle spectrum). This beam energy is sufficient to access the p-l'b reaction resonance at 163 kev. Similar data were used to calculate the absolute peak efficiency for our HPGe detector at 4.44 and 11.5 MeV (Fig. 3). IV. 7-Ray Detector Characterizations We use four different 7-ray detectors in the laboratory: two "standard" 3" x 3" NaI(Tl) detectors, a 5" x 3" NaI(Tl) detector, and a 200-cms (50% relative efficiency) HPGe detector. We are using the sources described in Section III to fully characterize and calibrate these detectors. For example, Fig. 3 illustrates the absolute peak efficiency measured for the HPGe detector. 6

Acknowledgements Dr. Ramon Leeper and Dr. Carlos Ruiz of Sandia National Laboratory provided detectors used in this work. We acknowledge Dr. Ed Cecil of the Colorado School of Mines for helpful discussions, and we thank Dr. Fredrick Seguin and Cristina Borris for their careful reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by LLNL Subcontract B116798, U.S. DOE Grant No. DE-FG02-91ER54109, by U.S. DOE Fusion Energy Postdoctoral Fellowshipt, and by U. S. DOE Magnetic Fusion Energy Technology Fellowshipt. 7

References 1. S. S. Medley, F. E. Cecil, D. Cole, M. A. Conway, et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 56 975 (1985). 2. G. Sadler, 0. N. Jarvis, P. v. Belle, et al., in Controlled Fusion and Plasma Heating (Proc. 14th Eur. Conf., Madrid, 1987), 11D, Part III, p. 1232 (1987). 3. R. D. Petrasso, C. L. Fiore, and C. K. Li, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59 1721 (1988). 4. J. E. Kameraad, J. Hall, K. Sale, et al., submitted to Phys. Rev. C (1991). 5. F. E. Cecil, D. M. Cole, R. Philbin, Phys. Rev. C 32 690 (1985). 6. F. E. Cecil and F. J. Wilkinson III, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 767 (1984). 7. H. Brysk, Plasma Phys. 15 611 (1973). 8. R. A. Lerche, M. D. Cable, D. W. Phillon, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61 3187 (1990). 9. D. H. Lo, R. D. Petrasso, K. W. Wenzel, et al., submitted to Rev. Sci. Instrum. (1992). 10. J. R. Lierzer, R. D. Petrasso, K. W. Wenzel, et al., submitted to Rev. Sci. Instrum, (1992). 8

11. K. W. Wenzel, D. H. Lo, R. D. Petrasso, et al. submitted to Rev. Sci. Instrum., (1992). 12. K. W. Geiger and L. van der Zwan, Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. 131 315 (1975). 13. J. F. Ziegler, Helium: Stopping Power and Ranges in all Elemental Matter, Pergamon Press, (1977) 14. S. Croft, Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A281 103 (1989). 15. F. E. Cecil, D. Ferg, H. Liu, et al., to be published in Nucl. Phys. A (1992). 16. R. Gunnink, Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. A299 372 (1990). 17. F. E. Cecil and S. S. Medley, DOE-APP alpha particle workshop, Germantown MD, Dec. (1989), unpublished. 9

Table 1: Ground-state fusion reactions that generate high-energy -y rays. Reactants Particle Q -t-ray E., -y-ray Refs. I Branch (MeV) Products (MeV)j B.R. p+d - - 5.5 oo 1 p+t - - f+a 19.8 o 1 p+5li YHe+a 4.02 Y+"Be 5.61 2.4 x 10-1 15 p+7li a + a 17.35 7+'Be 17.25 3 x 10-3 15 p+ 9 Be a+ali 2.12 y+ 10 B 6.59 2.9 x 10-15 p+"b c+sbe 8.59 ' + 1 2 C 15.96 6.5 x 10-r 15 3a 8.68 D+D p+t 4.03 Y + a 23.85 1.0 x 10-7 1 n+he 3.27 D+T n+a 17.59 -+He 16.69 5.4x 10-6,1 D+ 3 He p+a 18.35 y+ 5 Li 16.38 4.5 x 10" 5 D+ 6 Li a + a 22.37 Y+'Be 22.28 < 10-g 17 D+ 7 Li a+ 5 He 14.22 -+ 9 Be 16.70 < 7 x 10-B 17 10

Table 2: For a 10-keV ICF plasma, this table compares the arrival time (t") of the 14-MeV neutrons, the spread (FWHM) in their arrival times (At), and the arrival time (t.) of -y rays at a detector located a distance d from the target. A burn width -500 ps is expected in the NOVA Upgrade. d t" At t (cm) I(ps) I(ps) (ps) 10 1,926.78 38.24 333.567 100 19,267.8 382.4 3,335.67 1000 192,678. 3824. 33,356.7 11

'U- 104 12 0-4 U 102-208 TI 24 1 Amn/Be 100 -:- 100 - - 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000-80 Energy (kev) - - o -o 6 0 *. Wool'. 40 40.*-...*..'..*-*. - 20 20 0 ' '..' I'' 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500 4600 4700 Energy (kev) Fig. 1. The y-ray spectrum from a 10 mci 24 1 Am/Be source was obtained with our 200-cm 3 HPGe detector. The portion of the spectrum around the 4.44 MeV peak (inset shows the entire spectrum) was fit to the function a, e-(z-2/a+ a4e-(b-aj+ a 7 E +as. In this fit, the low-energy gaussian represents the Compton edge, and the high-energy gaussian represents the full-energy peak. Total counts derived from this fit were used to determine the absolute peak efficiency of the HPGe detector at 4.44 MeV (Fig. 3). 12

1 5 "3 ' 300 250 11 B(p,a)2a 104:_ 200 C -01U. ISO JC 1 100 oso50 I B(p,a)880' 10 3 0, 2 3 4 6 7. Energy (MOV) L M o2 0-10 0 101 100 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Energy (MeV) Fig. 2. A p-l'b 7-ray spectrum was taken with a 3" x 3" NaI(TI) detector over two hours while we bombarded a boron target with a 170-kV, 25-pA proton beam (inset shows the corresponding a-particle spectrum). Similar data were used to measure the absolute peak efficiency of the HPGe detector at 4.44 and 11.5 MeV (Fig. 3). 13

10-1 d=10 cm a1 =-5.8268733: a 2 =-0.7102472 C a 3 = 0.0490545 10-2 a 4 =-0.0820222- a5=-0.0040060 a -~0.0003374 a 10-3 CL 0 10-5 1-eeti y:.sna :: 0.1 1 10 100 Energy (MeV) Fig. 3. Absolute peak efficiency (peak counts per source photon) was measured for our HP Ge detector at a source-to-detector distance of 10 cm for y energies from 0.19 to 11.5 MeV (data points; the 4.44 MeV point from p-" 1 B reactions is offset to 5.44 MeV for clarity of display). We fit these data to a function, ln(r1) = E?.a[ln(E)](" 1 ), a common form for solid state detectors for energy >200 kev. 1 The uncertainties in these data were derived by adding in quadrature the uncertainties in absolute source intensity, geometry, and counting statistics. 14