Pinpointing phosphorylation sites using Selected Reaction Monitoring and Skyline



Similar documents
La Protéomique : Etat de l art et perspectives

Tutorial 9: SWATH data analysis in Skyline

Session 1. Course Presentation: Mass spectrometry-based proteomics for molecular and cellular biologists

Application Note # LCMS-81 Introducing New Proteomics Acquisiton Strategies with the compact Towards the Universal Proteomics Acquisition Method

The Scheduled MRM Algorithm Enables Intelligent Use of Retention Time During Multiple Reaction Monitoring

Research-grade Targeted Proteomics Assay Development: PRMs for PTM Studies with Skyline or, How I learned to ditch the triple quad and love the QE

In-Depth Qualitative Analysis of Complex Proteomic Samples Using High Quality MS/MS at Fast Acquisition Rates

ProteinPilot Report for ProteinPilot Software

Increasing the Multiplexing of High Resolution Targeted Peptide Quantification Assays

Tutorial for Proteomics Data Submission. Katalin F. Medzihradszky Robert J. Chalkley UCSF

MultiQuant Software 2.0 for Targeted Protein / Peptide Quantification

Building innovative drug discovery alliances. Evotec Munich. Quantitative Proteomics to Support the Discovery & Development of Targeted Drugs

泛 用 蛋 白 質 體 學 之 質 譜 儀 資 料 分 析 平 台 的 建 立 與 應 用 Universal Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis Platform for Quantitative and Qualitative Proteomics

ProteinScape. Innovation with Integrity. Proteomics Data Analysis & Management. Mass Spectrometry

Master course KEMM03 Principles of Mass Spectrometric Protein Characterization. Exam

Error Tolerant Searching of Uninterpreted MS/MS Data

Pep-Miner: A Novel Technology for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics

Effects of Intelligent Data Acquisition and Fast Laser Speed on Analysis of Complex Protein Digests

Global and Discovery Proteomics Lecture Agenda

Introduction to Proteomics 1.0

using ms based proteomics

Quantitative proteomics background

Accurate Mass Screening Workflows for the Analysis of Novel Psychoactive Substances

Retrospective Analysis of a Host Cell Protein Perfect Storm: Identifying Immunogenic Proteins and Fixing the Problem

Challenges in Computational Analysis of Mass Spectrometry Data for Proteomics

MRMPilot Software: Accelerating MRM Assay Development for Targeted Quantitative Proteomics

Mass Spectrometry Based Proteomics

Thermo Scientific PepFinder Software A New Paradigm for Peptide Mapping

Overview. Triple quadrupole (MS/MS) systems provide in comparison to single quadrupole (MS) systems: Introduction

Workshop IIc. Manual interpretation of MS/MS spectra. Ebbing de Jong. Center for Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Phone (612) (612)

Advantages of the LTQ Orbitrap for Protein Identification in Complex Digests

Investigating Biological Variation of Liver Enzymes in Human Hepatocytes

Overview. Introduction. AB SCIEX MPX -2 High Throughput TripleTOF 4600 LC/MS/MS System

Package MSstats. R topics documented: November 24, 2015

itraq Tips and Tricks

Absolute quantification of low abundance proteins by shotgun proteomics

HRMS in Clinical Research: from Targeted Quantification to Metabolomics

mquest/mprophet Software Manual

Statistical Analysis Strategies for Shotgun Proteomics Data

Learning Objectives:

Aiping Lu. Key Laboratory of System Biology Chinese Academic Society

Comparative LC-MS: A landscape of peaks and valleys

AB SCIEX TOF/TOF 4800 PLUS SYSTEM. Cost effective flexibility for your core needs

Chapter 14. Modeling Experimental Design for Proteomics. Jan Eriksson and David Fenyö. Abstract. 1. Introduction

Bruker ToxScreener TM. Innovation with Integrity. A Comprehensive Screening Solution for Forensic Toxicology UHR-TOF MS

Application Note # LCMS-66 Straightforward N-glycopeptide analysis combining fast ion trap data acquisition with new ProteinScape functionalities

Shotgun Proteomic Analysis. Department of Cell Biology The Scripps Research Institute

MaxQuant User s Guide Version

Proteomic Analysis using Accurate Mass Tags. Gordon Anderson PNNL January 4-5, 2005

Choices, choices, choices... Which sequence database? Which modifications? What mass tolerance?

Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review

Mass Spectrometry Signal Calibration for Protein Quantitation

Rapid and Reproducible Amino Acid Analysis of Physiological Fluids for Clinical Research Using LC/MS/MS with the atraq Kit

SpikeTides TM Peptides for relative and absolute quantification in SRM and MRM Assays

Introduction to mass spectrometry (MS) based proteomics and metabolomics

Analysis of the Vitamin B Complex in Infant Formula Samples by LC-MS/MS

DRUG METABOLISM. Drug discovery & development solutions FOR DRUG METABOLISM

Already said. Already said. Outlook. Look at LC-MS data. A look at data for quantitative analysis using MSight and Phenyx. What data for quantitation?

MarkerView Software for Metabolomic and Biomarker Profiling Analysis

ProSightPC 3.0 Quick Start Guide

A Streamlined Workflow for Untargeted Metabolomics

Introduction to Proteomics

Agilent G2721AA/G2733AA Spectrum Mill MS Proteomics Workbench

Quan%ta%ve proteomics. Maarten Altelaar, 2014

OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data

LC-MS/MS for Chromatographers

Thermo Scientific SIEVE Software for Differential Expression Analysis

Quantitative mass spec based proteomics

Quick and Sensitive Analysis of Multiclass Veterinary Drug Residues in Meat, Plasma, and Milk on a Q Exactive Focus LC-MS System

Quantification of Multiple Therapeutic mabs in Serum Using microlc-esi-q-tof Mass Spectrometry

Pesticide Analysis by Mass Spectrometry

What Do We Learn about Hepatotoxicity Using Coumarin-Treated Rat Model?

Improving the Metabolite Identification Process with Efficiency and Speed: LightSight Software for Metabolite Identification

High-Resolution Targeted Quantitation: Biomarker Discovery in a Mouse Transgenic Model of Myopathy

INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY TO SEE THE WHOLE PICTURE. AxION iqt GC/MS/MS

for mass spectrometry calibration tools Thermo Scientific Pierce Controls and Standards for Mass Spectrometry

Per Andrén Dept. of Pharmaceutical Biosciences Medical Mass Spectrometry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Protein Phosphorylation

# LCMS-35 esquire series. Application of LC/APCI Ion Trap Tandem Mass Spectrometry for the Multiresidue Analysis of Pesticides in Water

API 3200 LC/MS/MS SYSTEM. Performance, productivity and value combined

Interpretation of MS-Based Proteomics Data

MS/MS analysis of Polyphenols

A Navigation through the Tracefinder Software Structure and Workflow Options. Frans Schoutsen Pesticide Symposium Prague 27 April 2015

Introduction to Database Searching using MASCOT

A Quadrupole-Orbitrap Hybrid Mass Spectrometer Offers Highest Benchtop Performance for In-Depth Analysis of Complex Proteomes

Enzyme Response Profiling: Integrating proteomics and genomics with xenobiotic metabolism and cytotoxicity

Application Note # MT-90 MALDI-TDS: A Coherent MALDI Top-Down-Sequencing Approach Applied to the ABRF-Protein Research Group Study 2008

A High Throughput Automated Sample Preparation and Analysis Workflow for Comprehensive Forensic Toxicology Screening using LC/MS/MS

Un (bref) aperçu des méthodes et outils de fouilles et de visualisation de données «omics»

Peak intensity Trypsin. Protein Sequence Before trypsin digestion After digestion with trypsin for 24 h digestion

Transcription:

Pinpointing phosphorylation sites using Selected Reaction Monitoring and Skyline Christina Ludwig group of Ruedi Aebersold, ETH Zürich

The challenge of phosphosite assignment Peptides Phosphopeptides MS/MS spectra S T S R A G A MS/MS spectra S T* S A G A R AS*GS*T*AR phosphopeptide identification ASGSTAR peptide identification ASGST*AR phosphosite assignment 1

The case study: Phosphorylation changes upon shock before shock after shock 204 metabolic yeast enzymes yeast cell cultures steadystate protein extraction digestion (trypsin) phosphoenrichment (TiO 2 ) 2

Pinpointing Determination The case study: of phosphorylation Phosphorylation stoichiometries sites changes using SRM upon shock phosphorylation results table phosphopeptide sequence before shock after shock ratio YGGHS[p]MSDPGTTYR 367889 90293 0.25 KGS[p]MADVPK 562301 574839 1.02 shotgun LCMS/MS (LTQOrbi) labelfree quantification SASAVS[p]LPAK 305 3992 13.1 3

Ambiguities and missing values in discoverydriven data sets Gpd2 = Glycerol3phosphate dehydrogenase 2 Peptide sequence Peptide sequence phosphosite phosphosite PepP probability PepP probability before shock A before shock A before shock B before shock B before shock C before shock C after shock A after shock A after shock B after shock B after shock C S[p]DSAVSIVHLK [S70] 0.9881 0 4567890 355678 432123 0 0 0.18 #DIV/0! SDS[p]AVSIVHLK [S72] 0.9999 5320300 4670960 4236830 0 1042920 1154030 0.23 3.0E03 SDSAVS[p]IVHLK [S75] 0.9961 1915980 1574980 1120860 510526 1309220 0 0.59 2.3E01 S[p]DSAVS[p]IVHLK [S70],[S75] 0.9788 834567 0 590897 0 890753 0 1.25 #DIV/0! SDS[p]AVS[p]IVHLK [S72],[S75] 0.9888 966789 1056789 997654 0 780864 697650 0.73 1.0E02 Gpd1 = Glycerol3phosphate dehydrogenase 1 after shock C SS[p]SSVSLK [S23] 0.9671 0 0 789098 0 987539 0 1.25 #DIV/0! SSS[p]SVSLK [S24] 0.9979 6086840 5087770 4586845 0 22236600 18536600 3.88 2.0E03 SSSS[p]VSLK [S25] 0.9995 2345001 0 2678960 5754910 4796671 5196380 2.09 5.5E03 SSSSVS[p]LK [S27] 0.9889 2377960 227652 2146060 2806640 0 2502570 1.68 3.1E01 SSS[p]SVS[p]LK [S24],[S27] 0.9991 6744910 5888620 4656130 20481500 16751200 12117300 2.85 1.3E02 ratio ratio Ttest Ttest Are all identified phosphosites truly occurring in the sample? Do the obtained quantitative results reflect true biological changes? Targeted phosphoproteomics using SRM and Skyline 4

(Phospho)SRM workflow carried out in Skyline (phospho) peptide selection transition selection SRM measurement crude synthetic heavy phosphopeptides (JPT technologies) Gpd1 peptide sequence S[p]SSSVSLK [S22] Gpd2 peptide sequence S[p]DSAVSIVHLK phosphosite phosphosite [S70] SS[p]SSVSLK [S23] SDS[p]AVSIVHLK [S72] SSS[p]SVSLK [S24] SDSAVS[p]IVHLK [S75] SSSS[p]VSLK [S25] SSSSVS[p]LK [S27] 5

Getting phosphopeptides into Skyline (phospho) peptide selection 6

Getting phosphopeptides into Skyline (phospho) peptide selection All Uniprot modifications available 7

(Phospho)SRM workflow carried out in Skyline (phospho) peptide selection transition selection SRM measurement automatic selection of the yion and bion series (> 300 Da) using the transition filter settings in Skyline shared transitions unique transitions peptide sequence phosphosite precursor m/z y10 b1 y9 b2 y8 b3 y7 b4 y6 b5 y5 b6 y4 b7 y3 b8 y2 b9 y1 b10 S[p]DSAVSIVHLK [S70] 622.31 1076.62 961.59 874.56 370.06 803.52 441.1 704.45 540.17 617.42 627.20 504.27 740.29 405.27 839.35 976.41 1089.50 SDS[p]AVSIVHLK [S72] 622.31 1156.59 1041.56 874.56 370.06 803.52 441.1 704.45 540.17 617.42 627.20 504.27 740.29 405.27 839.35 976.41 1089.50 SDSAVS[p]IVHLK [S75] 622.31 1156.59 1041.56 954.53 290.10 883.49 361.14 784.42 460.20 617.42 627.20 504.27 740.29 405.27 839.35 976.41 1089.50 8

(Phospho)SRM workflow carried out in Skyline (phospho) peptide selection transition selection SRM measurement of synthetic peptides 9

Targeting of synthetic phosphopeptides for Gpd2 SRM measurement individual measurements of synthetic peptides [S70] [S72] [S75] peptide mixture [S70], 14.6 min [S72], 14.3 min [S75], 14.9 min all phosphopeptide forms are separable in retention time 10

Targeting of synthetic phosphopeptides for Gpd1 SRM measurement [S22] [S23] [S24] [S25] [S27] individual measurements of synthetic phosphopeptides peptide mixture [S24],[S25], 5.6 min [S23], 5.8 min [S22], 6.0 min [S27], 6.3 min phosphopeptide forms [S24] and [S25] are not separable in retention time. Other peptide forms are strongly overlapping but distinguishable. 11

Discrimination of [S24] [S25] despite coelution SRM measurement peptide sequence phosphosite precursor m/z y7 y6 y5 y4 y3 rt [min] S[p]SSSVSLK [S22] 437.70 707.40 628.38 541.34 454.31 355.24 6.0 SS[p]SSVSLK [S23] 437.70 795.37 628.38 541.34 454.31 355.24 5.8 SSS[p]SVSLK [S24] 437.70 795.37 708.43 541.34 454.31 355.24 5.6 SSSS[p]VSLK [S25] 437.70 795.37 708.43 621.31 454.31 355.24 5.6 SSSSVS[p]LK [S27] 437.70 795.37 708.43 621.31 534.28 435.21 6.3 [S22] [S23] [S24] [S25] [S27] y5 541.34 [S24] [S23] [S22] 12

Discrimination of [S24] [S25] despite coelution SRM measurement peptide sequence phosphosite precursor m/z y7 y6 y5 y4 y3 rt [min] S[p]SSSVSLK [S22] 437.70 707.40 628.38 541.34 454.31 355.24 6.0 SS[p]SSVSLK [S23] 437.70 795.37 628.38 541.34 454.31 355.24 5.8 SSS[p]SVSLK [S24] 437.70 795.37 708.43 541.34 454.31 355.24 5.6 SSSS[p]VSLK [S25] 437.70 795.37 708.43 621.31 454.31 355.24 5.6 SSSSVS[p]LK [S27] 437.70 795.37 708.43 621.31 534.28 435.21 6.3 [S22] [S23] [S24] [S25] [S27] y5 621.31 [S25] [S27] 13

intensity Retention time information is important for pinpointing phosphosites Phosphopeptide: XXX[S4]X[S6]X[S8]XX [S4] [S6] [S8] retention time retention time retention time [S4] separable in retention time [S6] [S8] coeluting [S4] [S6] [S8] X Y Z transitions usable for identification and quantification X X X [S4] [S6] [S8] [S4] [S6] [S8] not specifically identifiable and quantifiable X Y Z X X 14

accurate RT The irt concept implemented into Skyline The problem: The solution: Accurately measured empirical retention times are dependent on the setup of the currently used chromatographic system Usage of a set of calibration peptides to normalize all peptide retention times to a dimensionless irt value 14.8 min calibration peptides 14.5 min 15.1 min irt Consequence in practice: retention times need to be determined over and over again Consequence in practice: once an irt value is determined, the respective peptide can be scheduled and identified on any LC system Escher C. et al., Proteomics, 2012, 12, 11111121 Monday AM, Poster 624, Escher C. et al. 15

Quantification of endogenous phosphopeptides Gpd2 phosphoenriched yeast total cell extract synthetic, isotopicallylabeled phosphopeptides endogenous (light) synthetic (heavy) [S72] [S75] [S70] light heavy light heavy [S72] [S75] 16

ratio light/heavy ratio light/heavy Quantification of endogenous phosphopeptides Gpd2 phosphoenriched yeast total cell extract synthetic, isotopicallylabeled phosphopeptides endogenous (light) synthetic (heavy) [S72] [S75] [S70] [S72] [S75] before 30 min after shock 1.5fold downregulation (ttest pvalue = 0.01) before 30 min after shock 1.7fold downregulation (ttest pvalue = 0.01) 17

Quantification of endogenous phosphopeptides Gpd1 phosphoenriched yeast total cell extract synthetic, isotopicallylabeled phosphopeptides endogenous (light) synthetic (heavy) [S24] [S27] [S24] [S25] light heavy light heavy [S23] [S22] [S27] 18

ratio light/heavy ratio light/heavy Quantification of endogenous phosphopeptides Gpd1 phosphoenriched yeast total cell extract synthetic, isotopicallylabeled phosphopeptides endogenous (light) synthetic (heavy) [S24] [S25] [S24] [S27] [S23] [S22] [S27] before shock 30 min after before 30 min after shock 7.2fold upregulation (ttest pvalue = 2.1E4) 3.2fold upregulation (ttest pvalue = 2.4E4) 19

ratio light/heavy Quantification of a doubly phosphorylated peptide Gpd1 Spikein experiment (heavy crude phosphopeptides) SSS[p]SVS[p]LK [S24,27] endogenous (light) synthetic (heavy) light [S24,S27] heavy [S24,S27] before shock after 3.5fold upregulation (ttest pvalue = 4.4E4) 20

Takehome messages Targeted analysis of phosphorylation using SRM provides quantitative data of high quality, accuracy and reproducibility Requirement: A priori knowledge Specific phosphorylationsites can be pinpointed with high confidence Requirement: Learn the chromatographic behavior of phosphopeptide forms from synthetic reference peptides Application of the irt concept improves acquisition scheduling and peptide identification Requirement: Consistent use of retention time calibration peptides 21

Thank you Collaborators Ana Paula Oliveira Paola Picotti TSQsupport Mariette Matondo Nathalie Selevsek Ruedi Aebersold and the whole Aebersold lab Brendan MacLean Alana Killeen Lukas Reiter Oliver Rinner

Further complications for a phosphoanalysis with SRM: Neutral Loss H 3 PO 4 1. Loss of H 3 PO 4 = 98 Da example: y7 O y7 S D S A V S I V H L K S D S A V S I V H L K phosphoserine CID MS/MS H 3 PO 4 serine CID MS/MS H 2 O y7 backbone fragmentation & H 3 PO 4 loss y7 backbone fragmentation & H 2 O loss on S75 V S I V H L K transition coordinates V S I V H L K dehydroalanine dehydroalanine Q1 622.31 Q3 785.51 Conclusion For peptides comprising several possibly phosphorylated residues phosphosite assignments based exclusively on H 3 PO 4 neutral loss fragment ions can be erroneous, because their occurrence can also be due to a waterloss of a nonphosphorylated serine residue.

example for H 3 PO 4 (98 Da) phosphate loss interference peptide sequence Phosphosite precursor m/z y10 y10h 3 PO 4 b1 b1h 3 PO 4 y9 y9h 3 PO 4 b2 b2h 3 PO 4 y8 y8h 3 PO 4 b3 b3 H 3 PO 4 y7 y7h 3 PO 4 b4 b4h 3 PO 4 y6 y6h 3 PO 4 b5 b5h 3 PO 4 y5 y5h 3 PO 4 b6 b6h 3 PO 4 y4 y4h 3 PO 4 b7 b7h 3 PO 4 y3 y3h 3 PO 4 b8 b8h 3 PO 4 y2 y2h 3 PO 4 b9 b9h 3 PO 4 y1 y1h 3 PO 4 b10 b10h 3 PO 4 rt[mi n] S[p]DSAVSIVHLK [S70] 622.3 1 1076.62 961.59 874.56 370.06 252.09 803.52 441.1 343.12 704.45 540.17 442.19 617.42 627.20 529.23 504.27 740.29 642.31 405.27 839.35 741.38 976.41 878.44 1089.50 991.52 14.6 SDS[p]AVSIVHLK [S72] 622.3 1 1156.59 1058.61 1041.56 943.53 874.56 370.06 252.09 803.52 441.1 343.12 704.45 540.17 442.19 617.42 627.20 529.23 504.27 740.29 642.31 405.27 839.35 741.38 976.41 878.44 1089.50 991.52 14.3 SDSAVS[p]IVHLK [S75] 622.3 1 1156.59 1058.61 1041.56 943.53 954.53 856.55 290.10 883.49 785.51 361.14 784.42 686.44 460.20 617.42 627.20 529.23 504.27 740.29 642.31 405.27 839.35 741.38 [S70] [S72] [S75] 976.41 878.44 1089.50 991.52 14.9 16

Further complications for a phosphoanalysis with SRM: Neutral Loss HPO 3 2. Loss of HPO 3 = 80 Da example: O y7 y7 phosphoserine CID MS/MS HPO 3 S D S A V S I V H L K V S I V H L K y7 backbone fragmentation S D S A V S I V H L K V S I V H L K y7 backbone fragmentation & HPO 3 loss on S75 transition coordinates serine Q1 622.31 Q3 803.52 Conclusion For peptides comprising several possibly phosphorylated residues phosphosite assignments based exclusively on fragment ions NOT carrying the phosphate group can be erroneous, because their occurrence can also be due to a neutral loss of HPO 3. 17

The irt concept implemented into Skyline 17

The irt concept implemented into Skyline 18

The irt concept implemented into Skyline 19

The irt concept implemented into Skyline 20