The Effects of a Riparian Forest on Water Temperatures in the Restoration Area



Similar documents
Resolving complex issues with large scale river restoration; a case study: the San Joaquin River in California

PROJECT STATUS REPORT. Development of microhabitat suitability criteria for fry and juvenile salmonids of the Trinity River

Modeling Quality Assurance Project Plan

Year Post Restoration Monitoring Summary Rock Creek Project Monitoring and Analysis conducted by Bio-Surveys,LLC. Contact: strask@casco.

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

Monitoring the Benefits of Instream Habitat Diversity. Entiat River, Chelan County, Washington

Prioritizing Riparian Restoration at the Watershed, Reach and Site Scales. Richard R. Harris University of California, Berkeley Cooperative Extension

February 12, Objections to Temporary Urgency Change Order for the Central Valley Project and State Water Project

THE WATER AGENCY, INC. Water Supply Update

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

UTILITIZATION OF ECOHYDROLOGIC MODELS IN FLOODPLAIN FISH PASSAGE AND HABITAT RESTORATION EVALUATION

Rural Flooding: The Potential Role of Forestry

Walla Walla Bi state Stream Flow Enhancement Study Interim Progress Report. Department of Ecology Grant No. G

COMPLIANCE REPORT MUDDY HOLLOW CULVERT REMOVAL FILE NUMBER 25358N

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

Bruce Orr and Zooey Diggory S T I L L W A T E R S C I E N C E S. Tom Dudley U C S A N T A B A R B A R A

Penticton Creek May 4, 2015 Council Meeting

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage Reduction Capital Budget Approved by Legislature in June 2013

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA WATER YEAR 2002 WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT

Climate Change. Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist

Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.

CHAD R. GOURLEY SPECIALTY EMPLOYMENT

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Lower Dungeness River Estuarine & Floodplain Restoration

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Proposal to the Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG)

The Tahoe National Forest - Do You Know How to Surve scientifically Analyze a Study?

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

PANEL REVIEW OF THE DRAFT BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN: PREPARED FOR THE NATURE CONSERVANCY

21. Soil and Water: Restoration

Habitat Quality, Rainbow Trout Occurrence, and Steelhead Recovery Potential Upstream of Searsville Dam

Examining Blanding's Turtle Habitat using Remote Sensing and GIS: A study in the Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge, Saginaw, Michigan

Restoration of Cold Water Refugia in the Columbia River Estuary. *Chris Collins, Catherine Corbett, Keith Marcoe, Paul Kolp, Matthew Schwartz

Electric Service Guide. Residential Subdivision

May 29, Mr. Tom Howard Executive Director State Water Resources Control Board P.O. Box 100 Sacramento, CA

Attachment 9F: Floodplain Restoration Opportunity Analysis

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Flooding within RD 2092 (right) and at the San Joaquin River National Wildlife Refuge (left) in March of 2011.

October 11, Sharon Stohrer State Water Resources Control board P.O. Box 2000 Sacramento, CA

Monitoring Riparian Areas With a Camera

JOB DESCRIPTION. GS-11 $46,006 - $59,801 Annual/Full Benefits GS-12 $55,138 - $71,679 Annual/Full Benefits

Considerations of Spatial and Temporal Scales in Restoration. Gordon H. Reeves U.S. Forest Service PNW Research Station Corvallis, OR

Emery, Gary GIS Coordinator, Fisheries Dept, Hoopa Valley Tribe, P.O. Box 417, Hoopa, CA 95546; phone (530) x 22; gis@pcweb.

Solar PV panels fitted to roofs. Solar PV panels produce electricity from energy provided by sunlight. 3.5 MWh per system

Post-Flood Assessment

Sustainable Road Drainage Asset Management Strategy and Financial Requirements

ATTACHMENT 7. CWSRF Project Descriptions and Examples for Green Project Reserve

Chapter 11. Costs and Funding

Using Aerial Photography to Measure Habitat Changes. Method

Upper Des Plaines River & Tributaries, IL & WI Feasibility Study

Water Quality Restoration Plan. West Fork Illinois River Watershed HUC

Ruby River Grayling - Gravel Spawning Beds Monitoring Report January 2008

Where will data be collected? Specific Parameter Measurements. Funding required. Who would monitor and manage data? Partners.

HFQLG Project Evaluation Form

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

Effects of Land Cover, Flow, and Restoration on Stream Water Quality in the Portland, OR and Vancouver, WA Metro Area

A Briefing on the San Joaquin River Restoration Program

BIG CREEK Nos. 1 AND 2 (FERC Project No. 2175) VOLUME 1 (BOOK 1 OF 27 BOOKS) INITIAL STATEMENT, EXHIBITS A, B, C, D AND H (PUBLIC INFORMATION)

Salinity Real-Time Management Program Framework DRAFT October 17, 2014

Steelhead Recovery in San Juan and Trabuco Creeks Watershed

Delta Operations for Salmonids and Sturgeon (DOSS) Group Conference call: 6/4/13 at 9:00 a.m.

CWSRF Project Descriptions and Examples for Green Project Reserve

Block Inspection Englishman River - Island Timberlands -

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Predicted Fall Chinook Survival and Passage Timing Under BiOp and Alternative Summer Spill Programs Using the Columbia River Salmon Passage Model

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

FLOW AND WATER TEMPERATURE SIMULATION FOR HABITAT RESTORATION IN THE SHASTA RIVER, CALIFORNIA

Yakima River Basin Integrated Water Resource Management Plan

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

COASTAL CONSERVANCY. Staff Recommendation May 26, 2016 LOWER GREEN VALLEY CREEK COHO MIGRATION ENHANCEMENT

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

King County Flood Hazard Management Plan Update Cedar/ Sammamish Rivers. Public Meeting December 5, 2012

SILVICULTURE OF THE COLORADO FRONT RANGE LANDSCAPE RESTORATION INITIATIVE

US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. Rio Salado Oeste Salt River-Phoenix, Arizona FEASIBILITY REPORT SUMMARY

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION. Background

Tucannon River Large Wood Restoration Project Area 10 Final Report

Plumas Watershed Forum. Review of Ongoing Projects. Updated 10/1/008

A Stream Restoration Case Study in the California Central Coast

Why Count Birds? (cont.)

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

Watersheds, Streams, & Highways: Resiliency in Disaster Recovery Through Partnerships and Innovation

Untreated (left) and treated (right) Sierra Nevada forests in Amador County, CA. Photos: Sierra Nevada Conservancy

ERP: Willamette-Ecosystem Services Project

6.0 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES

Stream Restoration Account of Flood and Drought Response Fund Grant Program Guidance May 2014

Monitoring Hydrological Changes Related to Western Juniper Removal: A Paired Watershed Approach

LYNDE CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Table A1. To assess functional connectivity of Pacific marten (Martes caurina) we identified three stand types of interest (open,

Why should you care about the Arizona Water Settlements Act?

Restoring and Managing Riparian Areas

Bull Run River. Water Temperature Evaluation. Prepared by: City of Portland Bureau of Water Works Portland, Oregon

Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA)

San Joaquin River Settlement Water Supply Impacts And Water Management Goal. By Ronald D. Jacobsma General Manager Friant Water Authority

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

STATEMENT OF RON HUNTSINGER NATIONAL SCIENCE COORDINATOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S

Transcription:

Study 31 The Effects of a Riparian Forest on Water Temperatures in the Restoration Area Final 2015 Monitoring and Analysis Plan January 2015

1.0 The Effects of a Riparian Forest on Water Temperatures in the Restoration Area Theme(s): Adult Migration Rearing Habitat Flow Management Related Question(s): AM-004: What actions are needed, and where are they needed, to reduce daily maximum water temperatures in reaches 4B and 5 to provide suitable temperatures for adult passage? RH-018: What can be done to reduce daily maximum water temperatures in reaches 4 and 5 in April and May? Flow Management: Questions not developed for this theme to date. 1.1 Statement of Need Predictions from the initial HEC-5Q water temperature model (SJRRP, 2008) suggest that the daily maximum water temperatures in Reaches 4B and 5 will exceed the lethal threshold for adult spring-run Chinook salmon at a Friant Dam release of 4,500 cfs by April 24 during median (Probability = 0.52 exceedance) meteorological conditions (Figure 1). In a separate study, water temperature modeling will be conducted to evaluate different actions that may reduce water temperatures in Reaches 4B and 5. Those modeling analyses will require estimates of the effects of a mature riparian forest on solar radiation, air temperature, wind speed, and relative humidity that reflect conditions in the Restoration Area. Published studies on these effects have all been done on small headwater streams. It will be necessary to conduct studies on the San Joaquin River to calibrate the data for the water temperature modeling. 1.2 Background Studies in small headwater streams indicate that a 30-meter wide riparian tree canopy reduced above stream air temperatures by 8.6 F compared to sites without riparian trees (Moore et al., 2005). The rate of decline in air temperature due to riparian tree canopies is highest up to a width of 30 meters and only 0.36 F for each additional 10 meters of Study Plan 2015 Monitoring and Analysis Plan 1

width. It would be possible to use estimates of air temperature reduction, increases in humidity, and reduction in wind speed in a conceptual modeling analysis based on the data provided in Moore et al. (2005). However, there is a lack of meteorological data that could be used to quantify the effects of riparian canopy width along the San Joaquin River below Mendota Pool where the river flows toward the North. Preliminary results from the 2014 Riparian Microclimate Study, which included large forested sites on the Stanislaus River, indicate that 150-meter wide riparian forests may be needed on each riverbank to achieve an air temperature reduction of about 9 F in the Restoration Area (SJRRP, 2014). The preliminary data also suggest that valley floor forests reduce wind speeds and increase relative humidity levels to a greater degree than those reported for small headwater streams (Moore et al., 2005). Additional data will be needed in 2015 to assess the effects of flow below Sack Dam in the Restoration Area and to collect data during the spring when spring-run Chinook salmon would be expected to migrate in the Restoration Area. Riparian surveys are also needed for the Stanislaus River study sites and the San Joaquin National Wildlife Refuge to determine whether forest species composition or canopy density affect microclimates and water temperatures. The riparian forests in Reaches 4B and 5 within the San Luis National Wildlife Refuge are predominately Goodding s Willow (Salix gooddingii). The Stanislaus River sites have a high diversity of tree species and a much denser tree canopy. The San Joaquin National Wildlife Refuge has a range of restored forests, some of which are quite mature (Julie Rentner, Director of Special Projects, River Partners, Modesto, personal communication, 2014). Final 2 2015 Monitoring and Analysis Plan

Notes: Possible Wet Year Flow recommendation designed to maximize adult spring-run passage and two brief pulse flows for juvenile passage relative to the predicted daily maximum water temperatures (SJRRP, 2008) during average meteorological conditions from 1980 to 2005 (P = 0.52 exceedance) just upstream of Mendota Pool (Reach 2B), at Highway 41 (Reach 4A), and the confluence with Bear Creek (Reach 4B-5 boundary). The lethal threshold for adult salmon is a 7-day mean daily maximum temperature of 68 F and so temperatures that exceed the threshold for fewer than 7 days would not be lethal. The water temperature predictions in reaches 4B and 5 in this figure may exceed actual temperatures by about 2 F in April and by 1 to 2 F in May (SJRRP, 2012). Figure 1. Predicted Daily Maximum Water Temperatures at Management Target Locations for Wet Year Flow Recommendations 1.3 Anticipated Outcomes Monitoring microhabitat climates in different riparian habitats along the San Joaquin River and its tributaries will provide data needed to calibrate water temperature models that reflect restored riparian conditions in the Restoration Area. The greater the accuracy of the water temperature models, the greater the likelihood that model predictions will result in effective restoration actions needed for water temperature management. Botanical surveys will provide data that will help develop revegetation plans needed to reduce water temperatures during the spring migration period; optimize floodplain productivity during the winter; provide cover on the floodplains for juvenile salmon; and provide roughness estimates needed for fluvial geomorphic assessments. Tree species that shed their leaves in winter should provide sunlight that promotes floodplain productivity in winter and shade that reduces water temperatures in spring. The Study Plan 2015 Monitoring and Analysis Plan 3

herbaceous layer may affect the relative humidity and wind speed in the forest and so it may affect water temperatures. 1.4 Methods Type of Study: Field Study Reach(es): 1, 4B, and 5, Caswell Memorial State Park on the Stanislaus River, USACE Park Ripon River Crossing on the Stanislaus River, and the San Joaquin National Wildlife Refuge/Dos Reis Ranch/Hidden Valley Ranch. Fifteen Onset weather stations, established in summer 2014, will continue to monitor air temperature, wind speed, relative humidity, and solar radiation at paired sites in Reach 4B, Caswell Memorial State Park, and the USACE Park Ripon River Crossing on the Stanislaus River. Up to three new paired sites will be established at the San Joaquin National Wildlife Refuge, Dos Reis Ranch, and Hidden Valley Ranch where River Partners has restored over 2,000 acres of riparian forest and owns property yet to be restored. Each paired site includes an area with a mature riparian tree canopy at least 60 meters wide and another nearby area with a minimal tree canopy representative of typical conditions in the SJRRP Restoration Area. Caswell State Park and the USACE Park will be particularly useful, because they have dense, old growth woodlands that are at least 150 meters wide on each side of the river. The San Joaquin National Wildlife Refuge has large restored forests on one side of the river, where air temperature sensors could be established in the middle of the forest. Microclimate data will be collected at 15-minute intervals with battery operated units at all sites. Cattle exclusion fences will be constructed and maintained at the Reach 4B study sites. The data will be downloaded at weekly intervals. The weather stations were purchased in 2014 and USFWS staff will collect the weather station data. Some of the microclimate sensors may need to be periodically returned to Onset for calibration. Reclamation s Technical Service Center botanists will characterize the riparian forest at new study sites according to the crown density of the forest overstory as determined with hemispherical photos. They will also identify the primary species in the riparian forest overstory and herbaceous layer at each study site along a single transect marked with t- posts. USFWS staff will take all hemispherical photos of the riparian tree canopy. 1.5 Deliverables and Schedule Data collection at the Restoration Area will be continuous. A draft report will be produced by October 31, 2015 and a final report by December 31, 2015. Final 4 2015 Monitoring and Analysis Plan

1.6 Budget The total cost estimate is $117,319 for 2015. Weather station data collection includes 40 days for weekly data downloads, 10 days to install new weather stations, and 22 days to take hemispherical photos. Table 1. Proposed 2015 Budget Task Cost USFWS Weather Station Data Collection $64,089 Reclamation s Technical Service Center Botanical Surveys $49,730 Weather Station Repairs & Calibration $3,500 Total $117,319 1.7 Point of Contact / Agency Principal Investigator Carl Mesick, USFWS, 209.815.6994, Stockton Fish and Wildlife Office, 850 South Guild Ave., Suite 105, Lodi, CA 95240 Gregory K. Reed, Bureau of Reclamation, 303.981.2906, 6 th Ave. & Kipling St., P.O. Box 25007, 86-68290, Denver, CO 80225-0007 1.8 References Moore R.D., D.L. Spittlehous, A. Story. 2005. Riparian microclimate and stream temperature response to forest harvesting: a review. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41(4): 813-834. SJRRP. 2008. Temperature Model Sensitivity Analyses Sets 1 & 2. Draft Technical Memorandum, February 2008.. 2014. Effects Of A Riparian Forest On Water Temperatures In The Restoration Area. 2014 Mid-Year Data Reporting. Available at <http://restoresjr.net/flows/data-reporting>. Study Plan 2015 Monitoring and Analysis Plan 5

This page left blank intentionally. Final 6 2015 Monitoring and Analysis Plan