Modelling the Earth System. Understanding and predicting climate changes and fluctuations



Similar documents
IGCMG : IPSL Global Climate Modelling Group, models, requirements and projects

Regional Climate and Environment Center (RECC)

THE CURIOUS CASE OF THE PLIOCENE CLIMATE. Chris Brierley, Alexey Fedorov and Zhonghui Lui

SPOOKIE: The Selected Process On/Off Klima Intercomparison Experiment

The impact of parametrized convection on cloud feedback.

What the Heck are Low-Cloud Feedbacks? Takanobu Yamaguchi Rachel R. McCrary Anna B. Harper

WCRP Grand Challenge on. Clouds, Circulation and Climate Sensitivity

Large Eddy Simulation (LES) & Cloud Resolving Model (CRM) Françoise Guichard and Fleur Couvreux

II. Related Activities

Jessica Blunden, Ph.D., Scientist, ERT Inc., Climate Monitoring Branch, NOAA s National Climatic Data Center

Data Sets of Climate Science

Performance Metrics for Climate Models: WDAC advancements towards routine modeling benchmarks

REGIONAL CLIMATE AND DOWNSCALING

FRENCH ARCTIC INITIATIVE SCIENTIFIC PRIORITIES

Emergence of climate services

A Summary of the CMIP5 Experiment Design

SPACE STRATEGY AT IPSL 3 et 4 février 2013

Orbital-Scale Climate Change

Comparison of the Vertical Velocity used to Calculate the Cloud Droplet Number Concentration in a Cloud-Resolving and a Global Climate Model

IEAGHG Information Paper ; The Earth s Getting Hotter and So Does the Scientific Debate

Wind resources map of Spain at mesoscale. Methodology and validation

Ⅱ. Related Activities

Addendum to the CMIP5 Experiment Design Document: A compendium of relevant s sent to the modeling groups

CMIP6 Recommendations from The Cloud Feedback Model Inter-comparison Project CFMIP. Building bridges between cloud communities

Evalua&ng Downdra/ Parameteriza&ons with High Resolu&on CRM Data

Selecting members of the QUMP perturbed-physics ensemble for use with PRECIS

Satellite'&'NASA'Data'Intro'

Projections of sea level rise

California Standards Grades 9 12 Boardworks 2009 Science Contents Standards Mapping

CMIP5 and AR5 Data Reference Syntax (DRS)

Real-time Ocean Forecasting Needs at NCEP National Weather Service

Earth Sciences -- Grades 9, 10, 11, and 12. California State Science Content Standards. Mobile Climate Science Labs

Ocean and climate research at KNMI. Andreas Sterl KNMI

Using Cloud-Resolving Model Simulations of Deep Convection to Inform Cloud Parameterizations in Large-Scale Models

Description of zero-buoyancy entraining plume model

Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service

Fundamentals of Climate Change (PCC 587): Water Vapor

Roy W. Spencer 1. Search and Discovery Article # (2009) Posted September 8, Abstract

Observed Cloud Cover Trends and Global Climate Change. Joel Norris Scripps Institution of Oceanography

GCOS science conference, 2 Mar. 2016, Amsterdam. Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)

Graphing Sea Ice Extent in the Arctic and Antarctic

RADIATION IN THE TROPICAL ATMOSPHERE and the SAHEL SURFACE HEAT BALANCE. Peter J. Lamb. Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies

Phosphorus and Sulfur

The formation of wider and deeper clouds through cold-pool dynamics

Future needs of remote sensing science in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean: A report to support the Horizon Scan activity of COMNAP and SCAR

Atmospheric Processes

Decadal predictions using the higher resolution HiGEM climate model Len Shaffrey, National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Reading

Solar Flux and Flux Density. Lecture 3: Global Energy Cycle. Solar Energy Incident On the Earth. Solar Flux Density Reaching Earth

Chapter Overview. Seasons. Earth s Seasons. Distribution of Solar Energy. Solar Energy on Earth. CHAPTER 6 Air-Sea Interaction

Climate Models: Uncertainties due to Clouds. Joel Norris Assistant Professor of Climate and Atmospheric Sciences Scripps Institution of Oceanography

The Surface Energy Budget

Evaluating GCM clouds using instrument simulators

Atmospheric Dynamics of Venus and Earth. Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics UCLA 2 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

CMIP5 Data Management CAS2K13

CMIP6 Data Management at DKRZ

Limitations of Equilibrium Or: What if τ LS τ adj?

Report to 8 th session of OOPC. By Dr. Alan R. Thomas, Director, GCOS Secretariat

Towards an NWP-testbed

GCMs with Implicit and Explicit cloudrain processes for simulation of extreme precipitation frequency

Why aren t climate models getting better? Bjorn Stevens, UCLA

Ecosystem-land-surface-BL-cloud coupling as climate changes

Energy Pathways in Earth s Atmosphere

The Science and Ethics of Global warming. Global warming has become one of the central political and scientific issues of

Comparison of Cloud and Radiation Variability Reported by Surface Observers, ISCCP, and ERBS

Mariana Vertenstein. NCAR Earth System Laboratory CESM Software Engineering Group (CSEG) NCAR is sponsored by the National Science Foundation

The NASA NEESPI Data Portal to Support Studies of Climate and Environmental Changes in Non-boreal Europe

Chapter 3 Communities, Biomes, and Ecosystems

Supporting Online Material for

Climate Change on the Prairie:

Very High Resolution Arctic System Reanalysis for

The Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Correlation to. EarthComm, Second Edition. Project-Based Space and Earth System Science

Impact of microphysics on cloud-system resolving model simulations of deep convection and SpCAM

Interactive Data Visualization with Focus on Climate Research

Tutorial #2 Tracers. LMDZ team December 12, Setting up a case with a zoomed grid 1

6.4 Taigas and Tundras

Continental and Marine Low-level Cloud Processes and Properties (ARM SGP and AZORES) Xiquan Dong University of North Dakota

Climate Ready Tools & Resources

Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S)

Transcription:

02/02/2014 Modelling the Earth System Understanding and predicting climate changes and fluctuations IPSL Climate Modelling Centre J-L Dufresne Comité de visite de l AERES à l IPSL, 3-4 février 2014

Presentation The IPSL Climate Modelling Centre (ICMC) ICMC started in 1995. At that time major climate groups were already existing Integration of the various scientific topics necessary to built and ESM, distributed among the different IPSL laboratories A multi-disciplinary approach of the climate system and a coherent study of past, current and future climate changes were adopted since the beginning About 100-150 persons contribute to ICMC (LMD, LSCE, LOCEAN, LATMOS mainly) Organisation: a steering committee, 13 working groups, a board, a leader Location: in Jussieu and Gif-sur-Yvette, mainly Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 2 Page 2

Presentation The IPSL Climate Modelling Centre (ICMC) The main fields of interest are: Anthropogenic climate changes Paleoclimate Cloud feedbacks Climate-bieogeochemistry feedbacks Chemical composition Variability, predictability Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 3 Page 3

Development of the IPSL-CM climate model 1995: ICMC beginning 1997: first Atm-Ocean coupled run with the IPSL model 1997: PMIP1 simulations, small contribution to CMIP1 & 2 2001: coupled climate-carbon simulation 2003-2005: contribution to CMIP3 (and IPCC AR4) with IPSL-CM4 2004-2009: broad development of IPSL-CM4 IPSL-CM5: gather the various developments in a single, common model 2003 2009 Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 4 Page 4

The IPSL-CM5 Earth System Model Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 5 Page 5 All models are developed at IPSL, except the coupler

The IPSL-CM models for CMIP5 Earth System Model IPSL-CM5A-LR Low Resolution atm: 3.75 x2 L39 oce: 2 L31 IPSL-CM5A-MR Medium Resolution atm: 2.5 x1.25 L39 oce: 2 L31 Same + New atmospheric parameterisations Cold pools PBL: thermal plumes and cloud scheme Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 6 Page 6 Triggering and closure of convection IPSL-CM5B-LR Low Resolution atm: 3.75 x2 L39 oce: 2 L31

latitude O 3 concentration (ppb) Ozone zonal mean Mean ozone near surface [Bekki et al. 2013, Dufresne et al. 2013] [Szopa et al., 2013] Aerosols in 2100 Radiative forcing (W.m -2 ) particulate organic matter Black Carbone Sulphates [Szopa et al., 2013]

Carbon sink (PgC/y) Carbon Emission (PgC/y) Atmospheric CO 2 (ppm) Permissible CO 2 emissions Historical RCP8.5 RCP6.0 RCP4.5 RCP2.6 30 20 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 10 0 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 8 Page 8

Decadal predictability Can the initialisation of the ocean improve the climate predictability? Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) AMOC at 48 N Reconstructions Understand the processes at play over the last 60 years Focus on the North Atlantic and the meridional overturning circulation using IPSL-CM5A-LR Mt Agung eruption leads to an AMOC maximum 15 after Adding the SST anomalies increase the second maximum through NAO signature on the SST (cooling) and increase in convection a few years earlier Initialised Historical Control [Swingedouw et al. 2013] Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 9 Page 9 1960 1980 2000

Data distribution and CMIP5 analysis Large ensemble of simulations, from paleoclimate to aquaplanets 180 simulations (+ decadal), 25 000 years, 3 models, 800 variables Due to the lack of maturity of ESGF, we have to install the data nodes and to distribute the data ourselves. IPSL 20 papers on IPSL-CM5 model analysis in a special issue of Clim. Dynamics Down-load part of the CMIP5 data base on the IPSL data centre (Prodiguer-Ciclad) to facilitate multi-model analysis More than 20 additional papers already published based on multi-model analysis Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 10 Page 10

Last glacial maximum Paleoclimate study using a proxy simulator Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 11 Page 11

Paleoclimate study using a proxy simulator Last glacial maximum Dabundance [G.Ruber] (DMG PI) Dexport (DMG PI) IPSL-ESM + proxy simulators biomes foraminifera Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 12 Page 12 [Kageyama et al, C Dyn 2013]

Holocene - PI Holocene - PI Future - PI Past and future precipitation changes Mid-Holocene - preindustrial future (RCP8.5) mm/d Future - PI Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 13 Page 13 group 1 group 3 [Schmidt et al, 2013]

Normalized inter model standard deviation Climate sensitivity Cloud Feedbacks The spread of climate sensitivity is still mainly due to cloud feedbacks The response of low level clouds plays a dominant role in this spread Half of this spread may be explain by the strength of the mixing between the PBL and the free troposphere Inter-model spread of the climate feedbacks Climate sensitivity vs mixing strength in present-day climate [Vial, et al., 2013] cloud [Sherwood, et al., 2014 feedbacks Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 14 Page 14

IPSL contribution to CMIP5 CMIP5 experiments analysis The IPSL-CM5 model represents a major step in the development of parameterizations and in the coupling between physical and many biogeochemical processes The IPSL contribution to CMIP5 represents a qualitative step forward compared to CMIP3: large amount of model simulations, large diversities of experiments, many publications on IPSL-CM5 model analysis and on multi-model CMIP5 analysis The IPSL is an important actor of these international projects: choice of the experiments, comparison with observations, model documentation, tools for ESGF CMIP5 lessons: Major biases remains in most of the CMIP5 models, including IPSL-CM5 (small improvements between CMIP3 and CMIP5) Large spread in climate change estimate, even for basic quantities (generally small or no decrease between CMIP3 and CMIP5) Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 15 Page 15

Prospective: Better representation of processes Atmospheric parameterisations LES/CRM simulations, case study LMDZ in single column mode clouds same forcings D x= D y= 1km Large domain CRM simulations LMDZ in zoomed/nudged mode and/or with analysis restarts Diurnal cycle, coupling with surface Intermittent precipitation (stochastic triggering of convection) In collaboration with CNRM Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 16 Page 16 Organised convection Micro et macro-physique of clouds.

Ocean and Ice-sheets Increase of horizontal (1 and 0.25 ) and vertical (75 layers) resolution Diurnal cycle Physical parameterisations Mesh refining in key regions New sea-ice model In collaboration with Brest, Grenoble, UCL Prospective: Better representation of processes Fresh water flux due to icesheet melting Outbreak and transport of icebergs Ocean- Ice shelf interactions In collaboration with LGGE, Grenoble Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 17 Page 17

Prospective: Better representation of processes Climate-biogeochemistry interactions Ocean: Variable stoichiometry (Fe, Chl, C, Si, P, N) More plankton types, diatoms Link with marine resources Coupling with aerosols and chemistry In collaboration with LPO, Brest Land: New hydrology Nitrogen cycle Fires High latitudes (snow, permafrost ) Surface exchanges Forest and agriculture management Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 18 Page 18

Ocean: domain nesting Atmosphere: grid refinement Prospective: Refining spatial resolution Example of domains: Mediterranean Europe West Africa India China South Est Asia South America Antarctica Greenland Planed work: Automation of tools ESM (chemistry, aerosols ) Coupling with the ocean (West- Africa Gulf of Guinea, Arctic basin ) Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 19 Page 19

Number of simulated year/day DYNAMICO: new dynamical core, icosahedral 256 32 Prospective: New dynamical core Bench for a low resolution model (96x96 L39) DYNAMICO Present: New transport schema Quasi-uniform mesh Energy conserving Participation to the ICOMEX project Collaborations with applied mathematic Collaboration with IIT Delhi (OP Sharma) Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 20 Page 20 4 16 LMDZ 256 Number of cores degrees nb cores year/day 3 320 100 1 1 280 20 ½ 11 520 17 ¼ 81 920 14 4096 Bench with different resolutions Plans: Stretched grid Non hydrostatic In the IPSL-CM model Deep atmospheres (planets)

Prospective: Improvement of the modelling platform Facing Big Data era and Exascale challenges for Climate Sciences To ensure efficient and reliable execution of climate models on new computer architectures To develop a national platform capable of running large ensembles of simulations with a suite of models To handle the complex and voluminous datasets generated To facilitate the evaluation and validation of the models and the use of higher resolution models. ANR-project numerical methods CONVERGENCE(2013-2017) IPSL, CNRM, CERFACS IDRIS, MS Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 21 Page 21

Prospective: Contribution to CMIP6 Resolution and computer resources 1/12 0.25 IPSLCM1/2 (1994-2001) IPSLCM4 (2003-2009) IPSLCM5 (2008-2014) IPSLCM6 (2014- ) 0.5 CMIP6 Tests 1 CMIP3 PMIP2 CMIP5 PMIP3 Tests 2 4 CMIP2 PMIP1 Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 22 Page 22

Position, recognition Involvement in international programs or projects Very active in the WCRP (co-lead of WGCM, CFMIP, PMIP, C4MIP ), IGBP (PAGES), ENES Important contribution to CMIP5, PMIP3, CFMIP, C4MIP, ACCMIP, GeoMIP, LUCID, AEROCOM Active in the preparation of the IPCC AR5 (7 CLA, LA or RE) International working groups: ESGF European projects: IS-ENES, Metafore, Euclipse, Combine, Embrace National level: very active collaborations with Météo-France, Cerfacs, LGGE, LPO Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 23 Page 23

Conclusions Our Challenges To improve the representation of processes and the characteristics of the simulated climate To integrate the new dynamical core and to face the very high parallelism challenges To consolidate the model and data analysis platforms To face the new requirements that arises from the emergence of the climate services To pursue the analysis of climate changes and variability, with a focus on past versus future changes, complex versus simplified configurations, better understanding, use of observations Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 24 Page 24

Conclusions The support we are looking for: The recognition of the specificity of a climate modelling centre (work requiring close collaboration between many persons, with different interests in different domains of expertise) and the fragility introduced by too many and too complex structures, with possible opposite interests (IDEX, OSU ) The labelling of the IPSL-CM model and the data analysis platform, and the need of long term supports ICMC, as such, recognized as a direct partner of the national computer centers and infrastructures, with a need of dedicated and specific resources The possibility to promote scientific positions to fill a missing expertise that is not a priority for the laboratories Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 25 Page 25

Thank you for your attention Institut Pierre Simon Laplace Page 26 Page 26

Organisation of IPSL Climate Modelling Centre Head: J-L Dufresne; Board: J-L Dufresne; L. Bopp, MA Foujols, J. Mignot Steering Committee Modelling platform (IPSL-ESM) Arnaud Caubel (LSCE) - Marie-Alice Foujols (IPSL) Atmospheric and surface physics and dynamics (LMDZ) Frédéric Hourdin (LMD) - Laurent Fairhead (LMD) Ocean and sea ice physics and dynamics (NEMO-OPA,NEMO-LIM) C Ethé (IPSL) - Claire Lévy - Gurvan Madec (LOCEAN) Atmosphere and ocean interactions (IPSL-CM, different resolutions) Sébastien Masson (LOCEAN) - Olivier Marti (LSCE) Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (INCA, INCA_aer, Reprobus) Anne Cozic (LSCE) - M. Marchand (LATMOS) Current and future climate changes Jean-Louis Dufresne(LMD) - Olivier Boucher (LMD) Paleoclimate and last millennium Pascale Braconnot - Masa Kageyama (LSCE) Near-term prediction (seasonal to decadal) Eric Guilyardi (LOCEAN) - Juliette Mignot (LOCEAN) Regional climates Robert Vautard (LSCE), Laurent Li (LMD) Biogeochemical cycles (NEMO-TOP-PISCES) Laurent Bopp (LSCE) - Patricia Cadule (IPSL) Continental processes (ORCHIDEE) Philippe Peylin (LSCE) - Josefine Ghattas (IPSL) Data Archive and Access Requirements Sébastien Denvil (IPSL) - Karim Ramage (IPSL) Evaluation of the models, present-day and future climate change analysis Sandrine Bony (LMD) - Patricia Cadule (IPSL) - Marion Marchand (LATMOS) - Juliette Mignot (LOCEAN) Jérôme Servonnat (LSCE)