Laser Ranging to Nano-Satellites



Similar documents
RIEGL VZ-400 NEW. Laser Scanners. Latest News March 2009

The Moon. Nicola Loaring, SAAO

AUTOMATED OPERATIONAL MULTI-TRACKING HIGH PRECISION ORBIT DETERMINATION FOR LEO MISSIONS

C-S TEAM. Page 1 of 5

GPS Precise Point Positioning as a Method to Evaluate Global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model

DEOS. Deutsche Orbitale Servicing Mission. The In-flight Technology Demonstration of Germany s Robotics Approach to Service Satellites

Examination Space Missions and Applications I (AE2103) Faculty of Aerospace Engineering Delft University of Technology SAMPLE EXAM

MobileMapper 6 White Paper

RIEGL VQ-480. Airborne Laser Scanning. Airborne Laser Scanner with Online Waveform Processing. visit our website

GNSS satellite attitude characteristics during eclipse season

RS platforms. Fabio Dell Acqua - Gruppo di Telerilevamento

Analysis on the Long-term Orbital Evolution and Maintenance of KOMPSAT-2

Module 13 : Measurements on Fiber Optic Systems

Millijoules high master-slave pulse ratio 532 nm picosecond laser

5-Axis Test-Piece Influence of Machining Position

University microsatellites: an hands-on educational tool

Dancing in the Dark: How GNSS Satellites Cross the Earth s Shadow

Efficiency, Dispersion and Straylight Performance Tests of Immersed Gratings for High Resolution Spectroscopy in the Near Infra-red

VIETNAM ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY VIETNAM NATIONAL SATELLITE CENTER CUBESAT PICO DRAGON. Presenter Name: Do Xuan Phong

Full Waveform Digitizing, Dual Channel Airborne LiDAR Scanning System for Ultra Wide Area Mapping

AS COMPETITION PAPER 2008

Application Report: Running µshape TM on a VF-20 Interferometer

ShindaiSat : A Visible Light Communication Experimental Micro-Satellite

TOPO Trajectory Operations Officer

Enabling RTK-like positioning offshore using the global VERIPOS GNSS network. Pieter Toor GNSS Technology Manager

Fiber Optics: Fiber Basics

Optiffuser. High-performance, high bandwidth lightweight 1D diffuser.

Prospects for an Improved Lense-Thirring Test with SLR and the GRACE Gravity Mission

WAVELENGTH OF LIGHT - DIFFRACTION GRATING

GNSS and Heighting, Practical Considerations. A Parker National Geo-spatial Information Department of Rural Development and Land Reform

Two primary advantages of radars: all-weather and day /night imaging

The Applanix SmartBase TM Software for Improved Robustness, Accuracy, and Productivity of Mobile Mapping and Positioning

'' EGGBEATER '' ANTENNA VHF/UHF ~ PART 2

GNSS satellites as co-locations for a combined GNSS and SLR analysis

A science class experience that is out of this world. Robert Benkoczi, PhD Optimization Research Group University of Lethbridge

EXPERIMENT O-6. Michelson Interferometer. Abstract. References. Pre-Lab

Alignment Laser System.

Quantum cryptography

Günter Seeber. Satellite Geodesy 2nd completely revised and extended edition

How To Monitor Sea Level With Satellite Radar

Radar interferometric techniques and data validation Terrafirma Essen, March Page 1

Data Sheet. definiti 3D Stereo Theaters + definiti 3D Stereo Projection for Full Dome. S7a1801

Interference. Physics 102 Workshop #3. General Instructions

P R E A M B L E. Facilitated workshop problems for class discussion (1.5 hours)

CONSTRUCTING A CONSTELLATION OF 6U SOLAR POWER CUBE SATELLITES

PCB Component Placement Inspection

A PHOTOGRAMMETRIC APPRAOCH FOR AUTOMATIC TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT USING CONVENTIONAL CCTV CAMERA

Architecture Frameworks in System Design: Motivation, Theory, and Implementation

Index-Velocity Rating Development for Rapidly Changing Flows in an Irrigation Canal Using Broadband StreamPro ADCP and ChannelMaster H-ADCP

Satellite technology

Robot Perception Continued

Total Station Setup and Operation. Sokkia SET Total Station

Monitoring of Open Pit Mines using Combined GNSS Satellite Receivers and Robotic Total Stations

GGOS Bureau for Networks and Commuications Michael Pearlman Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge MA USA

Rodenstock Photo Optics

IP-S2 Compact+ 3D Mobile Mapping System

How To Understand Light And Color

E190Q Lecture 5 Autonomous Robot Navigation

Post Processing Service

Development of the Extreme Ultraviolet Spectrometer: EXCEED

RIEGL VZ Terrestrial Laser Scanning. 3D Very Long Range Terrestrial Laser Scanner with Online Waveform Processing

Diffraction of Laser Light

The NASA Global Differential GPS System (GDGPS) and The TDRSS Augmentation Service for Satellites (TASS)

Leveraging Performance-Based Cost Modeling For Earth Observation Missions

The Evolution of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Spectrum Use

Orbit Modeling and Multi-GNSS in the IGS

Space Weather Research and Forecasting in CRL, Japan

Optical laser beam scanner lens relay system

IP-S3 HD1. Compact, High-Density 3D Mobile Mapping System

Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission

The Model A032-ET of Riga Event Timers

Apogee Series. > > Motion Compensation and Data Georeferencing. > > Smooth Workflow. Mobile Mapping. > > Precise Trajectory and Direct Georeferencing

Status, Development and Application

16 th IOCCG Committee annual meeting. Plymouth, UK February mission: Present status and near future

How To Use A Ds340 (Dsp)

sonobot autonomous hydrographic survey vehicle product information guide

Introduction to teledection

v = fλ PROGRESSIVE WAVES 1 Candidates should be able to :

European Space Agency EO Missions. Ola Gråbak ESA Earth Observation Programmes Tromsø, 17 October 2012

Specifying Plasma Deposited Hard Coated Optical Thin Film Filters. Alluxa Engineering Staff

On May 27, 2010, the U.S. Air. Satellite. Antenna Phase Center and Attitude Modeling

Revision problem. Chapter 18 problem 37 page 612. Suppose you point a pinhole camera at a 15m tall tree that is 75m away.

A NEW LOOK AT RISLEY PRISMS. By Craig Schwarze Senior Systems Engineer OPTRA Inc.

m Antenna Subnet Telecommunications Interfaces

Small Satellite Space Traffic Management

Automated part positioning with the laser tracker

GPS: A Primer. presented by Jim Pugh, GISP GIS Project Manager. 2007, EMH&T, Inc.

APOPHIS 2029 A UNIQUE MISSION OPPORTUNITY

INTRODUCTION FIGURE 1 1. Cosmic Rays. Gamma Rays. X-Rays. Ultraviolet Violet Blue Green Yellow Orange Red Infrared. Ultraviolet.

Mobile Communications: Satellite Systems

Sun Earth Relationships

Autonomous Remote Monitoring System for Landslides Luca Manetti * a, Andrea Terribilini ** b, Alfredo Knecht* a

IAC 09 C3.4.5 SUSTAINABILITY ON-ORBIT: SPACE SOLAR POWER AND CLOUD COMPUTING CONSTELLATION TWO EXAMPLES OF INTERNATIONAL OFFSET PROJECTS

Use the following information to deduce that the gravitational field strength at the surface of the Earth is approximately 10 N kg 1.

Traffic Monitoring Systems. Technology and sensors

circular motion & gravitation physics 111N

Satellite Laser Communications on the Cheap

Penn State University Physics 211 ORBITAL MECHANICS 1

Transcription:

13-0222 Laser Ranging to Nano-Satellites G. Kirchner (1), Ludwig Grunwaldt (2), Reinhard Neubert (2), Franz Koidl (1), Merlin Barschke (3), Zizung Yoon (3), Hauke Fiedler (4), Christine Hollenstein (5) (1) Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Space Research, Graz (2) GFZ Potsdam (3) Technical University Berlin, Department for Aeronautics and Astronautics (4) DLR Oberpfaffenhofen (5) ETH Zuerich Georg.Kirchner@oeaw.ac.at Abstract: Several small satellites in the class of pico- and nano-satellites will be equipped with multiple small corner cubes: OPS-SAT (ESA), S-Net and TechnoSat (8 kg resp. 15 kg; Technical University Berlin), and CubETH (ETH Zuerich). The size of these satellites is in the range from 10x10x30 cm up to about 40x40x30 cm; the planned circular orbits are in the 450 620 km range. Commercially available 10 mm and 0.5 corner cubes will be used for SLR; a single corner cube of this size will be sufficient for SLR to the planned LEO orbits. Placing several of these corner cubes on each side of the satellites will not only allow for standard SLR and POD, but also for an independent attitude determination with < 1 accuracy, even after the end of the satellites lifetime, or in case of problems or satellite failure. For multiple satellites flying in close formation, it will be possible to distinguish the sequence of single satellites within the formation. 1. Introduction Numerous small satellites, called cube-sats, pico-satellites, nano-satellites, etc. typically designed and built by Universities have been launched during the past years, and are planned for launch within the next years. Usually, low Earth orbits (LEO; below e.g. 800 km) are selected for this type of satellites. Mounting small, cheap COTS (Commercial Off-The-Shelf) corner cube retroreflectors (CCR) on such satellites allows to use Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) for POD (precise orbit determination, and using multiple CCR per surface also for precise attitude determination, even after end of lifetime, in case of failure etc., down to short before re-entry into atmosphere. The satellites considered here will be launched within the next 2 or 3 years, into circular orbits, in altitudes between 450 and 620 km. All of them will be equipped with several COTS CCR of 10 mm or 1.27 mm (0.5 ) diameter. 2. Satellites to be equipped with COTS corner cube reflectors 2.1 OPS-SAT OPS-SAT is the first ESA satellite in this class of small satellites (Fig.1); at a planned orbit of 600 km altitude, it will be mainly a platform for software experiments. The FPGAs on board are reprogrammable in orbit, and will allow for various tests, changing software configuration, testing various operating systems, file transfer capabilities etc. Its size of 10x10x30 cm will allow to mount several CCR, possibly on several sides, allowing not only POD with SLR, but also precise attitude determination (see below).

Nadir Pointing Fig. 1: OPS-SAT: 10 x 10 x 30 cm; 600 km orbit; stabilized; launch planned for 2015 Placing multiple CCR on several sides is planned, but faces some problems due to surface needed for solar cells, and dimension constraints due to normalized launch containers. The present compromise solution places a ring of CCR around a camera at the nadir side. 2.2 TechnoSat Mission Fig. 2: TechnoSat: 400 x 400 x 300 mm, Technical University Berlin; technology demonstrator This mission is planned for launch in 2015, into a 600 km orbit (tbd); its dimensions and geometry allow placing several CCR at least on top and bottom side, and will be ideal for attitude determination via khz SLR.

2.3 S-Net: A communication network of 4 satellites using S-Band Fig.3: S-Net: 4 satellites with S-Band Transceivers, each 240 x 240 x 240 mm, TU Berlin The 4 satellites launched together, and ejected in very short intervals will use SLR data from CCR on their surfaces not only for POD and attitude determination, but also for identification of single satellites, especially during begin of the mission, when satellites are still close together. 2.4 CubeETH: A Swiss project (ETH Zuerich), mainly for GNSS experiments This satellite is planned for launch in 2016, into an orbit of about 450 km; the main goals will be GNSS experiments, using GPS, GLONASS, QZSS, GALILEO and COMPASS data in orbit. An additional science goal is attitude determination, using single-frequency GNSS (post-processing and real-time; proof-of-concept); this coincides nicely with the planned CCR, which also will allow such attitude determination using SLR. Fig. 4: CubeETH: 450 km orbit, GNSS Experiments

3. Single corner cubes for circular orbits of up to 620 km altitude The main goal here is to use a single, small and cheap COTS CCR on these satellites, to allow standard laser ranging to their orbits of up to 620 km, independent of CCR orientation. The velocity aberration at such orbits is in the range of 25 to 50 µrad; the CCR have to be big enough to deliver a return signal which should be at least comparable to the LAGEOS signals, allowing ALL SLR stations to range to these satellites. 200 150 Radar cross sect. / 1000 m² horizontal vertikal Airy 100 50 0.5 CCR (OTS optics) 0 100 50 0 50 100 Aberration / µrad Fig. 5: Radar cross section of a 0.5 COTS CCR, at a 620 km orbit, 45 incidence angle; the velocity aberration for such an orbit is between 25 and 50 µrad, and the expected return signal is about 2 x the LAGEOS signal. Right: Far Field Diffraction Pattern of 0.5 COTS CCR The 0.5 fused silica CCR used for these calculations are COTS parts with aluminium coating and protective painting of their back sides, and are available for less than 150 EUR per piece. 4. Attitude Determination Placing several CCR on EACH side of a satellite, allows precise attitude determination using khz SLR data. This has been demonstrated already several years ago, using SLR to the Russian satellite Reflector (Fig. 6). This khz SLR data set demonstrates nicely the possible high resolution for attitude determination; distance differences of less than 10 mm can be determined easily. To simulate attitude measurements and to determine the resolution, we used our far target at Graz SLR, a single 50 mm diameter retro-reflector mounted in a distance of about 4.3 km. The attenuated 2-kHz laser pulses (10 ps pulse width, 532 nm wavelength) were reflected at this CCR back to a test bar in front of transmit and receive telescope: a simple bar with 2 CCR mounted (fig. 7); this bar was rotated by ± 20 in 1 -steps from normal incidence. The photons reflected here made the trip back to our far target, and back again into our receive telescope. The total round trip time of single photons was measured with about 2.5 mm RMS. Using this data, the tilt angle of the bar was calculated, and compared with the tilt angle of the bar as set for each measurement (fig. 8).

Fig. 6: The Russian satellite Reflector (left): Graz 2-kHz SLR data shows the attitude during the pass with high resolution (right) Transmit Telescope Test Bar with 3 Retros Receive Telescope SLR Graz Far Target Distance: 4.3 km Fig. 7: Setup to simulate and measure attitude determination OPS SAT Simulation: Retro #1 - Retro #3 (317.5 mm distance) Deviations from line Deviation Retro 3-1 [ ] 2 1 0-1 Retro #1 -#3: 0.00 ± 0.28-2 -20-15 -10-5 0 5 10 15 20 Tilt Angle [ ] Fig. 8: Test bar tilt angle: Measured (via SLR to far target) vs. set tilt angle

Simulation: 2 Rotating Retros: Achievable Attitude RMS vs. Retro Distance; For Single Shots; and for NPs (100 Pts / NP; 5s @ 1% Returns at 2 khz); random variations ±5 mm (2.2 Sigma) 5 RMS of Attitude [ ] 4 3 2 1 Single Shot RMS vs. Retro Distance NP (100 Shots) RMS vs. Retro Distance Measured 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Retro Distance [mm] Fig. 9: Simulated achievable accuracy of tilt angle determination, depending on spacing of 2 CCR: Using single shot (blue dots) or normal point (red dots) data; measured accuracy for 2 selected spacings (200 mm and 315 mm): Green dots. Spacing of CCR, mounted on small satellites like CubeSats, is limited due the size of these satellites; hence we simulated such measurements for different spacing, taking the specifications of the khz laser ranging station Graz, and the available geometry on a small satellite into account. The results are shown in fig. 9: Using simulated single shot (blue dots) and normal point (red dots) data, it can be seen that down to a spacing of 50 mm of 2 CCR the attitude can be determined with a precision of less than 1 ; at smaller spacing of the 2 CCR, the returns from the 2 CCR cannot be distinguished anymore. For a CCR spacing of 200 mm and 315 mm resp. the tilt angles were measured with a precision of less than 0.5 (green dots). 5. Conclusion Several small satellites to be launched in the next years will be equipped with COTS corner cube reflectors; these fused silica CCR will be small: 0.5 or 10 mm diameter. They will allow SLR up to orbits of 620 km, with expected return signal strength of at least that from LAGEOS. Using more than 1 CCR per surface, it will be possible to determine the attitude of the satellites with a precision of better than 1, independent of operational status of the satellite. In case of multiple satellites flying in close configuration at least during mission start it will allow to determine the positions or sequence of the individual satellites. References: The major part of this work is the result of several meetings of the small group of proponents, as stated in the authors list. Several more project meetings are proposed in the near future, to finalize details about CCR arrangements etc; anybody interested to participate in these project meetings, or with plans to launch similar satellites, is welcomed to participate.