Photo 2. View showing flour mill, machine shed, veranda and saw mill + storage shed.



Similar documents
STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT REPORT BOLINAS MARINE STATION - BOLINAS, CALIFORNIA

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT. Full Metal Jacket Building 0 Prince Street, Alexandria, VA

Page & Turnbull imagining change in historic environments through design, research, and technology

October 30, Mr. & Mrs. Daniel Vick 101 Southwind Cove Benton, AR. Report of Findings, Structural Investigation, Benton, Arkansas, Dear Mr.

Building Condition Assessment: West Lexington Street Baltimore, Maryland

Bernie Nimer, Dave Seton Mayfair Hotel Development Corporation

Report on Sanctuary/Chancel Crawl Space Inspection. St. John in The Wilderness, 2896 Old Lakeshore Road Bright s Grove. Project No.

Structural Failures Cost Lives and Time

Foundation Experts, LLC Specializes in Foundation Repair and Waterproofing

Elevating Your House. Introduction CHAPTER 5

Building Condition Assessment: North Howard Street Baltimore, Maryland

14 September Sarah Zorn Planning and Economic Development 25 West Fourth Street, Ste St. Paul, MN 55102

201 WATER STREET FORWARDERS MUSEUM AND VISITORS INFORMATION CENTRE

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

symptoms of a faulty foundation

Spotting Structural Problems in a Home

EAST LYME HIGH SCHOOL

March 19, Ms. Jean McDonald CAP Management th Street, Suite 1010 Denver, Colorado 80202

How To Repair A House

TYPES OF PIERS USED IN NORTH AND EAST TEXAS RESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION REPAIR

Steve Brinkman Alain Pinel Realtors 167 S San Antonio Road Los Altos, CA RE: Foundation Inspection for 162 Del Monte Ave. Los Altos, CA 94022

OTTAWA CIVIC CENTRE & NORTH SIDE STANDS LANSDOWNE PARK FRANK CLAIR STADIUM STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY REPORT 2007

PELHAM MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL STONE FAÇADE REPORT. November 2007

Engineers, Civil Structural Survey

PERIODIC STRUCTURAL INSPECTION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS GUIDELINES FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT

BUILDING OVER OR NEAR WATER & SEWER MAINS POLICY

CABIN A Restored & Preserved 1850 Slave Cabin

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

SCHEMATIC AND PROJECT BUDGET APPROVAL EAST CAMPUS NURSING EDUCATION AND CLASSROOM

SECTION 3 ONM & J STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

~iffiui ~ Bridge Condition Survey. Inspection Date: 21 May 2003 District: San Angelo County: Tom Green Highway:

Slavic Village Building Condition Review

Structural Audit of Buildings

-SQA-SCOTTISH QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY HIGHER NATIONAL UNIT SPECIFICATION GENERAL INFORMATION

Structural Assessment Report

Failing Coastal Wood Infrastructure on the Great Lakes

Foundations 65 5 FOUNDATIONS. by Richard Chylinski, FAIA and Timothy P. McCormick, P.E. Seismic Retrofit Training

REHABILITATION PACKAGE 1-a

The Stabilizer TM. Benefits. Supplemental support system for sagging beams and floor joists within a crawl space

Breakaway Walls

When is a Permit Required? What Types of Permits are Required? The most common types of projects that require permits are:

Chapter. Restoration of Damaged Structures

BRIDGE RESTORATION AND LANDSLIDE CORRECTION USING STRUCTURAL PIER AND GRADE BEAM

Ross River Suspension Bridge Ross River, Yukon. Life Cycle Cost Analysis

The minimum reinforcement for the stem wall is the placement of:

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

Basement & Foundation Damage

ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS. Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE

INSPECTION FINDINGS. for. Paragon Condominiums 2102 W 31 st Avenue Denver, Colorado. Inspection Date: August 8, Perfonned By: Drew Schneider

Simpson Engineering A state licensed engineering firm F-1607

Chapter 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FEATURES IMPORTANT TO SEISMIC PERFORMANCE

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, INC.

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

USE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES. by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

INSTALLATION. General. Important Note. Design. Transport

BRIDGES ARE relatively expensive but often are

Building Foundation and Structure

MEMORANDUM West Swann Avenue, Suite 225 Tampa, Florida Phone (813) Fax (813)

Handling, Erection and Bracing of Wood Trusses

Prepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California Prepared By

SECTION SITE PREPARATION

HEDDERMAN ENGINEERING, INC. Office , Fax

Materials. Estimating Steel. Players. Materials. Shop Drawings. Detailing Process. Standard shapes. Fabricated members, Built-up sections

load on the soil. For this article s examples, load bearing values given by the following table will be assumed.

COMMONLY USED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODES

Evaluation of Appropriate Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation Methods for Iowa Bridges

Chapter. Earthquake Damage: Types, Process, Categories

Foundation Evaluation Report for PROPERTY ADDRESS Houston, Texas August 30, Prepared for:

The Collapse of Building 7 by Arthur Scheuerman December 8, 06

7 Crucial Questions to Ask Before Repairing Your Home s Foundation

Lighthouse Engineering, L.L.C.

What is Seismic Retrofitting?

Seismic Isolation Retrofitting of Japanese Wooden Buildings

NCMA TEK CONCRETE MASONRY FOUNDATION WALL DETAILS. TEK 5-3A Details (2003)

Designed and Engineered to Perform

City of Kingston Information Report to Municipal Heritage Committee Report Number MHC

How to Identify, Evaluate & Repair Shrinkage Cracks in Poured Concrete

MEMORANDUM. General: Foundation:

Sample Drawing Package for One and Two Family Dwelling Applications

Emergency repair of Bridge B421

Fame Design Ltd (10295) Plot # A-115/116,BSCIC Hosiery I/A, Narayangonj, Bangladesh ( , ) 18.June.2014

Current Status of Seismic Retrofitting Technology

Residential Foundations and Basements

PART E SPECIFICATIONS

Culvert Rehabilitation A presentation by ms consultants, inc. engineers, architects, planners

Tank Lifting. A.P.I. 650 and 653 only give general guide lines to the type of foundation. Number of different types, evaluated on the basis for:

Field Damage Inspection and Static Load Test Analysis of Jiamusi Highway Prestressed Concrete Bridge in China

SEISMIC UPGRADE OF OAK STREET BRIDGE WITH GFRP

STANDARD AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION

Analysis and Repair of an Earthquake-Damaged High-rise Building in Santiago, Chile

A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO INSPECTING STRUCTURE. By Roy Newcomer DLS-1 03/07

D Sample Notices to Property Owners, Sample Affidavits, and Other Material

Transcription:

May 7,2015 KSANDER & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS 130 HUINTER STREET, UNIT 103, PETERBOROUGH, ONTARIO K9H2K8 TELEPHONE (705) 743-9221 FAX 743-0904 Ontario Region Conservation Authority 250 Milroy Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, K9H 7M9 Att. Mr. Dan Marinigh Re: Foundation Condition Needler s Mill Dear Sir, Photo 1. Scenic View As requested, I have performed a preliminary foundation inspection of the above noted building. I have also read and studied previous reports such as from Acres International, 2004 and Geologic 2004 and have the following comments: The Needler s Mill compound actually consist of six separate structures all adjacent to each other. That being, the flour mill, the machine room shed to the flour mill, the deck and veranda to the flour mill, the saw mill and finally the split level wood storage shed. It is interesting that all six structures have independent foundations not related to the adjacent buildings yet depend, somewhat, on the adjacent structural framing for stability. (Not considered good building practice). Photo 2. View showing flour mill, machine shed, veranda and saw mill + storage shed. Needler s Flour Mill The foundation of the main mill consist four heavy steel girders each supported by 3 large 24 diameter reinforced concrete piers. Since, historically, that the mill was actually built downstream and re-located to its present location, the existence of these steel girders would have made the re-location project straightforward and it would have been a logical conclusion to leave them in place and conveniently make them part of the permanent foundation at this new site.

Unfortunately, the bottom of the concrete piers were not accessibly to the author at the time of writing this report. Also, no previous report describes what the piers are actually founding on. It is my opinion, that the piers are likely founded on loose fill on their own without bottom pads which would account for the present condition of the piers. I have attached a sketch Sk-1 marking each of the 12 large piers in question and attempted to photograph each of them with comments to their condition. Photo 3. Pier 1,Heavy corrosion. Unstable. Photo 4. Pier 2,Heavy corrosion. Unstable Photo 5.Pier 3, Some Spalling. Conditon fair. Photo 6. Pier 4, Condition good. Photo 7. Pier 5,Some spalling. Out-of-plumb, condition fair Photo 8. Pier 6 Some spalling. Condition fair.

Photo 9. Pier 7 Condition fair Photo 10. Pier 8 Condition fair Photo 11. Pier 9 Condition unknown Photo 12. Pier 10 Condition good Photo 13. Pier 11. Condition good Photo 14. Pier 12. Condition unkown Photo 15. Typical Steel support girder on concrete pier Condition fair

The Deck and Veranda The deck and veranda foundation consists of 3 small concrete piers supporting the east end of the framing. The west side is attached to the main mill framing and relies on it for support. The 3 small piers have leaned out-of-plumb and severely settled and cannot be considered reliable for support of the framing above. It is likely that this part of the mill was added onto the main mill after the re-location. Photo 16. Veranda Pier. Unstable Photo 17. Veranda Pier, Some corrosion. Unstable Machine Room The machine room foundation consist of a structural floating shallow raft slab that serves the purpose of a structural floor to support any heavy machinery as well as supporting the main timber framing. There are clear signs of heaving and cracking of the concrete and rotting of the wood support framing on top. Photo 18. Machine room slab plus rotted post on top. Photo 19. Rear view of cracked and heaved machine room slab.

Saw Mill The saw mill foundation is similar to the machine room in that it is supported by an exposed shallow structural raft slab. Photo 21. Typical failed slab, sheared around timber post. Photo 22. Settled slab with timber post suspend above it Storage shed The storage shed is a split level structure adjacent to the saw mill building. Photo 23. Outside view of stepped concrete pads. Photo 24. Inside view of stepped concrete pads The pads are shallow and show signs of heaving and settling. Foundation deficiencies The structural integrity of the concrete foundations are critical in maintaining the stability of the timber framing above. Although the loads are relatively light, the locations of the point loads can induce severe local stress on the foundation below. When one pier or area of a support slab has failed it will immediately cause the load to shift to other locations and overload that area. If that location can temporary support the increased load the building temporary appears to be stable as the mode of failure has become what is known as a progressive collapse. On the other hand, if the adjacent support cannot support the extra weight, a sudden catastrophic failure can occur and collapse can be imminent. Foundation deficiencies that need to be address and corrected as soon as possible include but are not limited to: - Severely corroded concrete and reinforcing steel

- Severely out-of-plumb concrete support piers - Severely failed concrete support raft slabs - Severely failed concrete support pads Foundation deficiencies that should be addressed when practical are: - Sandblasting and epoxy protection of steel support girders - Additional lateral steel bracing design for the piers Conclusions and recommendations Unfortunately, I m not aware of any practical methods to conduct the above noted repairs without temporarily lifting and removing the wood timber structure above. The temporary shoring required to support the building in-place while repairs are undertaken requires a reliable and sound subgrade to withstand the loads from shoring jacks and heavy timber cribbing. The sub-grade under the buildings is unsuitable loose wet organic fill. Although, not part of the scope of this report, one should seriously consider the structural condition of the timber framing above the foundation before deciding to move the superstructure and the practicality of re-building or restoring the wood framing. Clearly, there are areas of the timber framing that need re-construction or restoration. Also, once the decision to lift the buildings have been made, it would not be practical to repair the foundations since, in my opinion, they were ill-conceived and have not performing adequately. Instead, it is recommendations that the existing foundations be removed and new foundations be engineered and constructed. The new foundations should be designed to rely on the strong stiff clay strata approximately 6 feet below grade for support and in doing so would not be sensitive to frost action, water table fluctuations, and settlement and should have an indefinite lifespan. Public safety in and around the buildings Since the buildings are located within the village and in a high traffic area, public safety is a concern. It is my opinion that it is unlikely that these buildings will survive the next 10 years without intervention. Therefore, in the interest for public safety, I suggest that a proper perimeter hoarding fence be installed around all the buildings as soon as possible, approximately 20 feet away so as to allow for a possible collapse without danger to the public. Once the hoarding fence has been installed, the following longer term options may be undertaken if desired: Option #1 -Remove the veranda and crawl space skirting of the four mill for future re-construction. -Instigate the first phase of the lifting of the flour mill by installing the required heavy lifting girders and their support cribbing. -Install temporary shoring jacks onto the exterior timber beams of the saw mill and storage shed as per the attached bracing detail Sk-2 or remove saw mill and storage shed in such a way to be able to re-install at a later time. - install a load-bearing 2x6 stud wall inside the machine room shed to support the existing shed roof or remove machine room shed in such a way to be able to re-install at a later time.

-Restrict access inside the buildings. Option #2, -Demolish all the building structures in an orderly and safe way. If you have any questions or I can be of any further service to you, please feel free to contact me. Yours truly, Ksander & Associates Per: Rick Ksander, P.Eng. 05.07.15