Exam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance



Similar documents
On the Efficiency of Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information

Review of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology

An Extension Model of Financially-balanced Bonus-Malus System

CHAPTER 11: ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY

Practice Set #4 and Solutions.

3 Introduction to Assessing Risk

1 Introduction to Option Pricing

1. (First passage/hitting times/gambler s ruin problem:) Suppose that X has a discrete state space and let i be a fixed state. Let

Valuation of American Options

Modern Actuarial Risk Theory

Lecture 11. Sergei Fedotov Introduction to Financial Mathematics. Sergei Fedotov (University of Manchester) / 7

Chapter 9 Experience rating

Call Price as a Function of the Stock Price

1 Portfolio mean and variance

A Model of Optimum Tariff in Vehicle Fleet Insurance

Binomial lattice model for stock prices

The Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates. An Impossible Bond Pricing Model. 780 w Interest Rate Models

TPPE17 Corporate Finance 1(5) SOLUTIONS RE-EXAMS 2014 II + III

American Options. An Undergraduate Introduction to Financial Mathematics. J. Robert Buchanan. J. Robert Buchanan American Options

AFM 472. Midterm Examination. Monday Oct. 24, A. Huang

Option Valuation. Chapter 21

Master s Theory Exam Spring 2006

10 Binomial Trees One-step model. 1. Model structure. ECG590I Asset Pricing. Lecture 10: Binomial Trees 1

Part V: Option Pricing Basics

FAIR VALUATION OF THE SURRENDER OPTION EMBEDDED IN A GUARANTEED LIFE INSURANCE PARTICIPATING POLICY. Anna Rita Bacinello

Final Exam Practice Set and Solutions

Two-State Option Pricing

Modern Actuarial Risk Theory

IEOR 6711: Stochastic Models, I Fall 2012, Professor Whitt, Final Exam SOLUTIONS

Overview. Option Basics. Options and Derivatives. Professor Lasse H. Pedersen. Option basics and option strategies

FIN FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SPRING 2008

Option pricing. Vinod Kothari

Institutional Finance 08: Dynamic Arbitrage to Replicate Non-linear Payoffs. Binomial Option Pricing: Basics (Chapter 10 of McDonald)

Financial Market Microstructure Theory

University of Texas at Austin. HW Assignment 7. Butterfly spreads. Convexity. Collars. Ratio spreads.

Math 370/408, Spring 2008 Prof. A.J. Hildebrand. Actuarial Exam Practice Problem Set 2 Solutions

American and European. Put Option

Chap 3 CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models

3. The Economics of Insurance

Financial Markets. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania

Chapter 1: Financial Markets and Financial Derivatives

Midterm Exam:Answer Sheet

JANUARY 2016 EXAMINATIONS. Life Insurance I

The Binomial Option Pricing Model André Farber

Monte Carlo Methods in Finance

Lecture 11 Uncertainty

Call and Put. Options. American and European Options. Option Terminology. Payoffs of European Options. Different Types of Options

Options pricing in discrete systems

ECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Week 5 Precepts October 21 Insurance, Portfolio Choice - Questions

Current Accounts in Open Economies Obstfeld and Rogoff, Chapter 2

Name: 1 (5) a b c d e TRUE/FALSE 1 (2) TRUE FALSE. 2 (5) a b c d e. 3 (5) a b c d e 2 (2) TRUE FALSE. 4 (5) a b c d e.

THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ARBITRAGE PRICING

Analysis of a Production/Inventory System with Multiple Retailers

COMPLETE MARKETS DO NOT ALLOW FREE CASH FLOW STREAMS

7: The CRR Market Model

Pension Fund Dynamics

UCLA Anderson School of Management Daniel Andrei, Derivative Markets 237D, Winter MFE Midterm. February Date:

THE DYING FIBONACCI TREE. 1. Introduction. Consider a tree with two types of nodes, say A and B, and the following properties:

Black-Scholes-Merton approach merits and shortcomings

Invesco Great Wall Fund Management Co. Shenzhen: June 14, 2008

Risk/Arbitrage Strategies: An Application to Stock Option Portfolio Management

How To Price A Call Option

1 The Black-Scholes model: extensions and hedging

On the mathematical theory of splitting and Russian roulette

Some Research Problems in Uncertainty Theory

a. What is the portfolio of the stock and the bond that replicates the option?

Stocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing

Choice under Uncertainty

Lesson 4 Annuities: The Mathematics of Regular Payments

Jorge Cruz Lopez - Bus 316: Derivative Securities. Week 9. Binomial Trees : Hull, Ch. 12.

1 Interest rates, and risk-free investments

EC3070 FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES

Assessing Credit Risk for a Ghanaian Bank Using the Black- Scholes Model

4: SINGLE-PERIOD MARKET MODELS

Statistics in Retail Finance. Chapter 6: Behavioural models

Lecture 4: Properties of stock options

Valuing Stock Options: The Black-Scholes-Merton Model. Chapter 13

IMPLEMENTING ARROW-DEBREU EQUILIBRIA BY TRADING INFINITELY-LIVED SECURITIES

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

OPTIMAL DESIGN OF A MULTITIER REWARD SCHEME. Amir Gandomi *, Saeed Zolfaghari **

UNIVERSITY OF OSLO. The Poisson model is a common model for claim frequency.

On Compulsory Per-Claim Deductibles in Automobile Insurance

K 1 < K 2 = P (K 1 ) P (K 2 ) (6) This holds for both American and European Options.

This paper is not to be removed from the Examination Halls

Lecture 15: Final Topics on CAPM

BINOMIAL OPTION PRICING

Algebra I Credit Recovery

Finite Differences Schemes for Pricing of European and American Options

DERIVATIVE SECURITIES Lecture 2: Binomial Option Pricing and Call Options

University of Chicago Graduate School of Business. Business 41000: Business Statistics

Lecture 12: The Black-Scholes Model Steven Skiena. skiena

Chapter 2 Portfolio Management and the Capital Asset Pricing Model

Consider a European call option maturing at time T

Introduction, Forwards and Futures

Transcription:

Exam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance Date: January 8, 2013. Duration: 3 hours. This is a closed-book exam. The exam does not use scrap cards. Simple calculators are allowed. The questions may be answered in English or in Dutch. This exam has 5 pages. 1. After the exam period, you will go on a holiday to the US. You are looking to buy a travel insurance policy. The risk X you face has the following distribution: x P [X = x] 0 0.90 1 000 0.05 10 000 0.05 Your utility is driven by power utility with parameter 2/3, u(w) = w 2/3. The travel insurance company has an exponential utility function with parameter α = 0.000 08. The initial wealth equals w 0 = 10 000 and W 0, respectively. a. When you run an insurance company you face several risks. What are the main risks used in the supervision of insurance companies (Solvency II)? b. Under the assumptions described above and using the equilibrium equation from using expected utility, determine the minimum premium P the insurer wants to receive. c. Under the assumptions described above and using the equilibrium equation from using expected utility, what would be the maximum premium P + you are willing to pay to the insurer? Does this result in a transaction? d. On the basis of the formulas used in the derivation in b., show that P can be approximated by 550 + 2 373 750 α. Do we have a 1

transaction when using this approximation? What do you learn from this? e. The travel insurer is considering to buy reinsurance where the reinsurance premium is based on the expected value premium principle with safety loading λ. Would you recommend a proportional or a stop-loss reinsurance contract? Why? 2. A bonus-malus scale with n steps is often used in car insurance. In the case of no claims during the past year, a driver will go up one step on the scale. In the case of claims during the past year, the driver will go down the scale with at least one step. The bonus-malus scale can be modeled using Markov Chains. The state space is 1,..., n and X t denotes the (random) state at time t for t = 0, 1,.... Assume that the sequence of random variables X 0, X 1, X 2,... is a stationary, discrete time Markov Chain. Also assume that the random variables C t = number of claims for a driver in year t for t = 1, 2,... are i.i.d. Furthermore, denote the number of rides in each year by m, constant through time. On each ride, the probability of a claim equals p. a. If we assume that the rides are independent, what would be a suitable distribution for modeling C t? Furthermore, we assume that n = 2 and the bonus malus scale is as follows: New step after... claims Step Premium 0 1 2 3+ 1 10 1 1 1 2 2 25 1 1 2 2 b. Express the transition matrix P in terms of m and p. c. Compute the steady state distribution in terms of m and p. d. The steady state premium b(m, p) is a function of m and p. Determine b(m, p). e. For b(m, p) it holds that for a given m, b(m, p) is increasing in p. Similarly, for a given p, b(m, p) is increasing in m. Please explain. Note: you do not need to prove these relationships. 3. Suppose you run an insurance company and you face a non-negative risk X. To try to avoid a bankruptcy, you are risk averse. When 2

considering the premium you charge for the risk X, several premium principles are available. We focus on the variance premium principle, so π[x] = E[X] + αvar[x] with α > 0. a. Define the following four desirable properties: non-negative loading, no rip-off, consistency and additivity. b. Check whether the variance premium principle satisfies the no rip-off property for all values of α. If so, prove it. If not, provide a counterexample or disprove it. After meeting with several other insurers, you decide to underwrite policies by a pool of insurers (co-insurance). Losses are shared according to a predetermined ratio. The total risk is denoted by S and each insurer i = 1,..., n accepts a proportion r i of the risk, S i = r i S, where 0 r i 1 and r i = 1. Each insurer employs the variance premium principle with parameter α i, i = 1,..., n. c. Show that minimizing the total premium results in proportions r i that are inversely proportional to α i. Interpret. 4. The equations below describe competitive equilibrium in a singleperiod market with uncertainty. The notation is as follows: k is the number of agents, u i (x) (i = 1,..., k) are their utility functions, n is the number of possible future states, and p j (j = 1,..., n) are the objective probabilities of these states. Moreover, the initial payoff of agent i in state j before trading is given by ω j i (i = 1,..., k; j = 1,..., n), whereas the payoffs in equilibrium are denoted by x j i (i = 1,..., k; j = 1,..., n). The utility functions satisfy the standard properties u i(x) > 0 and u i (x) < 0 for all x. q j x j i = q j ω j i (i = 1,..., k) (1) q j u i(x j i ) = λ i p j (i = 1,..., k; j = 1,..., n) (2) k k x j i = ω j i (j = 1,..., n) (3) q j = 1 (4) a. Explain the reasons why these equations are imposed. Also explain the meaning of the variables that appear in the equations and that were 3

not already mentioned above. [8 pts.] b. Show the following property: if there are two states j 1 and j 2 such that k k ω j 1 i = ω j 2 i then the equilibrium allocation satisfies x j 1 i = x j 2 i for all i = 1,..., k. [8 pts.] c. Describe the meaning of the property in part b. in words. 5. Let a single-period market with two possible future states and two assets be given as follows: current price in price in price up state down state S 0 S u S d B 0 B u B d Assume that the following inequalities hold: S u S 0 > B u B 0 > B d B 0 > S d S 0. Prove that this market does not allow arbitrage. [8 pts.] 6. Consider the following tree model for the price of a risky asset: 60 50 30 70 50 45 15 Assume that the discretely compounded riskfree interest rate is 2% per period. One period corresponds to one step in the tree. a. Determine the price of a European put option with strike K = 60. b. Determine the price of an American put option with the same strike. 4

7. Consider a market that is given by a geometric tree model with parameters u, d, and r. In other words, there are two assets called S and B which have initial values S 0 and B 0 respectively and whose prices evolve according to the rules S γu = us γ, S γd = ds γ, B γu = B γd = (1 + r)b γ where γ denotes a general node in the tree. It is assumed that u > 1 + r > d > 0. a. Prove that the implied probability q of an up move is the same for every node in the tree. b. Let p be a given number such that 0 < p < 1. Prove that it is possible, given an initial capital V 0, to define a trading strategy which satisfies the budget constraint at every node and which is such that the portfolio value at a node γ that is reached after j up moves and k j down moves is given by V γ = pj (1 p) k j q j (1 q) k j (1 + r)k V 0. Derive explicit expressions for the amounts of units of both assets that are to be held in the portfolio at each node, and prove that the percentage of portfolio value held in risky assets (S) is the same at each node. [10 pts.] c. Prove that the portfolio strategy defined above provides an optimal solution for the maximization problem maximize E P [ ln(v N )] subject to budget constraint at each node, initial portfolio value = V 0 where N > 0 is a given integer, and the symbol E P indicates that expectation is taken under the assumption that the objective probability of an up move at each node is given by p. 5