FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION



Similar documents
Geotechnical Investigation Test Report

KWANG SING ENGINEERING PTE LTD

1.0 INTRODUCTION SCOPE OF WORK EXECUTION OF FIELD WORK LABORATORY TESTS FINDINGS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 9

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT

1 Mobilisation and demobilisation 1 Deep boring sum 2 Cone penetration tests sum 3 Miscellenous tests sum

Geotechnical Investigation using Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in Rangamati, Bandarban and Khagrachari Towns

CIVL451. Soil Exploration and Characterization

A study on the Effect of Distorted Sampler Shoe on Standard Penetration Test Result in Cohesionless soil

COMPENDIUM OF INDIAN STANDARDS ON SOIL ENGINEERING PART 2

c. Borehole Shear Test (BST): BST is performed according to the instructions published by Handy Geotechnical Instruments, Inc.

Site Investigation. Some unsung heroes of Civil Engineering. buried right under your feet. 4. Need good knowledge of the soil conditions

How To Design A Foundation

Testing Procedures. Note: Please refer to Table 2 for a list of completed borings.

Chittagong Hill Tract Development Facilities (CHTDF) United Nations Development Programme

Geotechnical Investigation Reports and Foundation Recommendations - Scope for Improvement - Examples

HIGHWAYS DEPARTMENT GUIDANCE NOTES ON SOIL TEST FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN

GUJARAT NARMADA VALLEY FERTILIZER CO. LTD. (GNFC Ltd) TECHNICAL REPORT GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED TDI PLANT AT VILLAGE RAHIYAD, DAHEJ

King Saud University College of Engineering Civil Engineering Department DEFORMATION OF PARTIALLY SATURATED SAND. Sultan Musaed Al-Ghamdi

INDIRECT METHODS SOUNDING OR PENETRATION TESTS. Dr. K. M. Kouzer, Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, GEC Kozhikode

Method Statement FOR. Soil Investigation

SPECIFICATION FOR DYNAMIC CONSOLIDATION / DYNAMIC REPLACEMENT

Geotechnical Measurements and Explorations Prof. Nihar Ranjan Patra Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

TECHNICAL NOTE: SI 01 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF INSPECTION BODIES FOR SITE INVESTIGATION

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 3, No 3, 2013

ENCE 4610 Foundation Analysis and Design

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 4 : In-situ tests [ Section 4.1: Penetrometer Tests ] Objectives

Standard Test Procedures Manual

LABORATORY DETERMINATION OF CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO

product manual HS-4210 HS-4210_MAN_09.08 Digital Static Cone Penetrometer

Pavements should be well drained both during and upon completion of construction. Water should not be allowed to pond on or near pavement surfaces.

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

ANNEX D1 BASIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVIEWING STUDIES IN THE DETAILED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR SAFETY

INSITU TESTS! Shear Vanes! Shear Vanes! Shear Vane Test! Sensitive Soils! Insitu testing is used for two reasons:!

SITE INVESTIGATION FACILITIES

FREDERICK SHERRELL LTD

INVITATION FOR TENDER FOR SUPPLY OF EQUIPMENT

FACTUAL GROUND INVESTIGATION

An Automatic Kunzelstab Penetration Test

APPENDIX F GEOTECHNICAL REPORT

Anirudhan I.V. Geotechnical Solutions, Chennai

LABORATORY CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES

23 Royal Avenue London. Geotechnical Assessment Report. Report No. LW September 2014

2009 Japan-Russia Energy and Environment Dialogue in Niigata S2-6 TANAKA ERINA

Geotechnical Testing Methods II

Evaluation of Properties of Soil Subgrade Using Dynamic Cone Penetration Index A Case Study

REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION BRIDGE STRUCTURE REPORT

PERMEABILITY TEST. To determine the coefficient of permeability of a soil using constant head method.

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION. Adelaide Street Pollution Control Plant Outlet Structure Replacement London, Ontario

Measurement of Soil Parameters by Using Penetrometer Needle Apparatus

CONSULTANCY & MATERIAL TESTING FACILITY

Chapter 4 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES

Geological and Geotechnical Investigations for Structure

GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FORMULAS. A handy reference for use in geotechnical analysis and design

Central Purchase unit National Institute of Technology Srinagar Soil Mechanics Lab of Civil Engineering Department.

20 ACRE UBATC SITE ( 650' x 1,350') UINTAH BASIN MASTER PLAN VERNAL CAMPUS. Architects Engineers Program and Construction Managers

SNC-Lavalin Inc. Montcalm Wastewater Pumping Station Upgrades - Geotechnical Report. October 2011

Module 1 : Site Exploration and Geotechnical Investigation. Lecture 5 : Geophysical Exploration [ Section 5.1 : Methods of Geophysical Exploration ]

patersongroup Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development 590 Hazeldean Road - Ottawa Prepared For Ontario Inc.

TECHNICAL Summary. TRB Subject Code:62-7 Soil Foundation Subgrades February 2003 Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30, SPR-2362

DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION TEST INSTRUCTIONAL MANUAL GEOTECHANICAL

Soil Mechanics. Soil Mechanics

QUESTION TO AUDIENCE

Work Type Definition and Submittal Requirements

Eurocode 7 - Geotechnical design - Part 2 Ground investigation and testing

GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL

Table of Contents 10.1 GENERAL

Soils, Foundations & Moisture Control

SERVICES 2015 ISO 18001

CHAPTER 9 SOIL EXPLORATION 9.1 INTRODUCTION

NOTES on the STANDARD PENETRATION TEST

NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS FOR STANDARD PENETRATION TESTING FOR LIQUEFACTION EVALUATIONS. Jeffrey A Farrar M.S.

Report. Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Easy Access Upgrade Marrickville Railway Station Station Street, Marrickville, NSW

TENDER NO: PSER:SCT:SNG-C1667:15 VOLUME III PRICE SCHEDULE (REV-00)

Highway 23 Paynesville Richmond Soils Borings, Soils Tests, and Reporting

S OIL C ONSULTANTS LTD

Tests and Analyses on Shear Strength Increment of Soft Soil under Embankment Fill

How To Prepare A Geotechnical Study For A Trunk Sewer Project In Lincoln, Nebraska

Soil Testing Soil index properties 24. Cone Penetrometer Method BS 1377, , EN DD ENV Semi-Automatic Cone Penetrometer

REPORT. Earthquake Commission. Christchurch Earthquake Recovery Geotechnical Factual Report Merivale

JOHNSON STREET BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT

METHOD A10 (a) THE DETERMINATION OF THE IN-PLACE DRY DENSITY OF SOIL OR GRAVEL BY THE SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 11/5/13)

Strength Determination of "Tooth-Paste" Like Sand and Gravel Washing Fines Using DMT

Ground investigation and Eurocode 7: A Scottish perspective

UNOPS UNITED NATIONS OFFICE FOR PROJECT SERVICES

Soil Classification Through Penetration Tests

NOTES on the CONE PENETROMETER TEST

Comparison of Continuous Dynamic Probing with the Standard Penetration Test for Highly Weathered Limestone of Eastern Sudan

GUIDELINES FOR GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION OF BRIDGE STRUCTURES. Materials Engineering Report No M (Supersedes Report No.

Dyanmic Cone. for Shallow

HOUSE BUILDING DIGEST

CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin PLAN SUBGRADES

Effect of grain size, gradation and relative density on shear strength and dynamic cone penetration index of Mahi, Sabarmati and Vatrak Sand

GUIDELINE FOR HAND HELD SHEAR VANE TEST

The Manitoba Water Services Board SECTION Standard Construction Specifications PIPE EXCAVATION, BEDDING AND BACKFILL Page 1 of 11

CW 3110 SUB-GRADE, SUB-BASE AND BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Standard penetration test (SPT)

Transcription:

FINAL REPORT ON SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AT SS-6B AREA AT HPCL VISAKH REFINERY VISAKHAPATNAM ANDHRA PRADESH J.J. ASSOCIATES(VISAKHAPATNAM) AETP(P) LIMITED #11-6-3, RockDale Layout, MaharaniPeta, Visakhapatnam 530 002.

Table of Contents Tables and Figures (Enclosures)... 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 SCOPE OF WORK... 1 3 INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY...1-2 4 FIELD INVESTIGATIONS... 2 4.1 Standard Penetration Tests... 2 4.2 Sampling... 2 5 LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS...2-3 6 Generalised geological profile... 4 6.1 Geological Profile for Proposed Construction of SS-6B area... 4 7 DESIGN SOIL PARAMETERS FOR FOUNDATIONS... 4 8 SUMMARY,ANALYSIS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS...4-6 Tables and Figures (Enclosures) Field Bore logs Laboratory test results Bore Log Details Site Plan

1. INTRODUCTION M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited proposed to conduct Soil Investigation at SS-6B Area in DHT project at Visakha Refinery,Visakhapatnam. Accordingly, land soil investigations were envisaged to evolve various soil/rock parameters in order to carry out engineering analysis and foundation design. In this connection, the soil investigation work was awarded to M/s J.J.Associates (VSKP) AETP Pvt Ltd., Visakhapatnam vide Purchase order No. 9000163-OQ-10004 dated 11/2/2010 to carry out the land soil investigations at the proposed site. Broad objectives of the investigations are as follows. (a) To evaluate the parameters of soil/rock at the proposed site. (b) To assess the engineering parameters and to estimate the safe bearing capacity of soil 2. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work includes drilling of One(1) Land Boreholes at SS-6B Area. Location of the boreholes is presented in the enclosed figure. Borehole Locations sketch provided by M/S TOYO ENGINEERING CORPORATION / HPCL. The scope also includes carrying out field tests like Standard Penetration Test (SPT) in boreholes, collection of disturbed and undisturbed soil samples and carrying out the relevant laboratory tests on collected soil samples. 3. INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGY The details of the drilling rigs and methodology of boring are explained in the following sections. Boreholes were terminated as per the direction of Engineer In charge. After positioning the rig at the specified location, for drilling through soil. Borehole was sunk by mechanically operated Cable Tool (Shell & Auger) in soil and Rotary drilling in rock. Flush jointed steel casing tubes were provided to prevent possibility of side collapse in boreholes. After reaching the desired depth, depending upon the soil layer encountered, either Standard Penetration Tests & Vane Shear Tests were conducted or Undisturbed or disturbed soil samples were collected. 1 J.J.ASSOCIATES (Vskp) AETP (P) LIMITED

The location of the boreholes is shown in the enclosed sketch. The field tests and sample collections were conducted in the boreholes in accordance with the relevant Indian Standard codes of practice and as per the following. (a) (b) Standard Penetration Test in soils at regular depth intervals Disturbed & Undisturbed soil samples 4. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS 4.1 Standard Penetration Tests Standard penetration tests (SPT) were carried out in soil within boreholes to determine strength characteristics of soil. This was carried out in accordance with IS: 2131. The number of blows required to drive the standard split spoon sampler for penetration of 0.30 m by a 63.5 kg hammer falling freely from a height of 750 mm is recorded N Value at regular intervals in the borehole. If the sampler is not fully penetrating into soil, then the test was terminated after refusal noting the rate of penetration. 4.2 Sampling Disturbed & Undisturbed representative soil samples were collected during investigations and subsequently sent to laboratory for visual examination and testing. The disturbed soil samples were also collected from split spoon sampler. 5. LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS All collected soil samples from the boreholes were brought to laboratory for necessary testing and rechecking the preliminary borelogs. The laboratory tests comprised of a. Grain Size distribution of all samples collected from boreholes Grain size distribution was determined in two stages. The soil fraction retained on 75 micron IS Sieve was analysed by Sieve analysis using standard set of IS Sieve as prescribed by IS 460 1962. Sieve analysis is again done in two stages. The oven dried samples of soil was separated into two fractions by passing it through 4.75mm IS Sieve. The portion passing through the sieve was analysed by fine analysis using the IS Sieve Nos. 2mm, 1mm, 500, 425, 300, 212, 150 and 75 microns. The portion retained on this sieve was analysed by coarse analysis using IS Sieve Nos. 100, 60, 20, 10 and 4.75mm. 2 J.J.ASSOCIATES (Vskp) AETP (P) LIMITED

b. Atterberg Limits on all clay fractions Liquid limit of the soil was determined by Casagrande method using Casagrande type mechanical liquid limit apparatus. Plastic limit was determined as per the standard procedure. c. Natural moisture content Natural moisture content of the soil was determined by oven drying method as per IS : 2720 Part II, 1969. Weights were taken to an accuracy of 0.001gr. d. Bulk & Dry density Bulk density and dry density of the undisturbed soil samples were evaluated as per IS:2720 e. Triaxial Test. The encountered strata was stiff in consistency, careful attention is made to extract sample from the tube. The test is conducted as per part of IS 2720. f. Specific Gravity Tests Specific gravity test was conducted on the soil fraction passing through 425 micron I.S.Sieve by density bottle method or by pycnometer. All weights are taken to an accuracy of 0.001 gr. and the tests were conducted at 27 C. g. Chemical Analysis of soil & water Chemical Analysis for soil and water were carried out for PH value chlorides, sulphates and organic matter and the results are enclosed in the report. h. Consolidation tests Consolidation tests were conducted on vertical drainage using Fixed ring cell type consolidometer. The soil specimens were allowed to consolidate under pressure increments of 0.01, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 kg/cmª. The pressures were unloaded through increments of 4.00, 2.00, 1.00, 0.50, 0.25 and 0.01 kg/cmª. Each pressure increment was maintained constant per 24 hours. The vertical compression was measured after the application of each pressure increment after the following elapsed times, 0, 0.25, 1.00, 2.25, 4.00, 6.25, 9.20, 12, 25, 16.00, 20.25, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100, 225, 400, 720 and 1440 minutes. Note : The Possible tests are only conducted if samples were collected. In some case soil samples could not be collected as rock is met at shallow depth. 3 J.J.ASSOCIATES (Vskp) AETP (P) LIMITED

6.GENERALISED GEOLOGICAL PROFILE A generalised geological profile is prepared for individual boreholes. The description of the various layers is based on the laboratory test results based on IS classification. For the purpose of clarity, existing ground level is considered as 0.0m, datum for boreholes in the individual geological profile. 6.1 Geological profile of proposed SS-6B Area(Bh-7). Bore logs at proposed SS-6B Area shows the soil strata as per Field observation & bore log. The geology of the proposed site is varying with respect to the thickness of each layer. The top over burden predominantly consists of Filled up material from 0.00 to 1.00m followed by Clay with Sand, Highly Weathered rock. The ground water Level is observed in the bore hole at shallow depth. Soil Properties 0.00 to 1.00m 1.00m to 2.50m 2.50m & below Gravel content % Filled up 7 to 11 Sand content % material 31 to 43 Silt and Clay content % 46 to 62 Soil Classification as per IS CL-SC Note : A layer of Clay with pebbles observed from 6.00m to 6.50m 7.Suggested Design Soil Parameters Layer No. Depth Below GL FROM TO Soil type 1 0.00 1.00 Filled up material Average N-Value Highly rock Cu t/m 2 Ф degree Weathered γ t/m 3 - - - - 2 1.00 2.50 Clay with sand & pebbles 13 - - - 3 2.50m & below Highly weathered 50 - - 2.10 rock 8. SUMMARY, ANALYSIS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 General The summary of the investigation is given below. Total One (1) borehole is conducted in the proposed site. 4 J.J.ASSOCIATES (Vskp) AETP (P) LIMITED

8.2 Analysis SAFE BERING CAPACITY FROM SHEAR CRITERIA IN BOREHOLE 7 Safe Bearing Capacity from shear criteria at a depth of 2.50m Q ns = (2/3 CN C S C D C I C + r D f (N Q -1) S Q D Q I Q + 0.5r BN r S r D r I r W r ) / FS C = Cohesion intercept = 0 kg/cm 2 ø = 36 ø = IF(ø <=28,(TAN -¹ (0.67*TAN ø )Else ø) N C N Q N r = Bearing capacity factors which are obtained by interpolation Here N C = 51.96 N Q = 39.48 N r = 60.31 S C S Q S r = Shape factors which are 1.00 for Strip and 1.30 for Square I C I Q I r = Inclination factors Nø = tan 2 (((22/7)/4) + (ø/2) ) D C = 1 + ( 0.2 x (Depth / Width) x Nø) here it is 1.491 D Q = D r = 1 for ø > 10 D Q = D r = 1 + ( 0.1 x (Depth/Breadth) x Nø) for ø > 10 Here D r = D Q = 1.246 Qns = Safe Bearing Capacity Factor of safety : 3.00 Safe Bearing Capacity from shear criteria at a depth of 2.50m S No. Depth Width Length Net safe Bearing Capacity in t/m 2 Strip Square 1 2.50 2.00 2.00 115.42 126.94 2 2.50 3.00 3.00 120.46 128.76 3 2.50 4.00 4.00 128.26 133.90 4 2.50 5.00 5.00 137.16 140.36 5 2.50 6.00 6.00 146.61 147.48 Taking N = 50, SBC Calculation as per IS:8009 (Part-I)-1976 from Settlement Criteria at a depth of 2.50m below G.L(i:e) at R.L +2.997 in Bore Hole-7. 5 J.J.ASSOCIATES (Vskp) AETP (P) LIMITED

S No. Depth of Width of Settlement Allowable bearing Foundation Foundation Pressure for pressure for 25mm 10t/m 2 settlement(t/m 2 ) 1 2.50 2.00 4.70 53.19 2 2.50 3.00 5.20 48.08 3 2.50 4.00 5.50 45.45 4 2.50 5.00 5.60 44.64 Recommendations: Considering the subsoil conditions prevailing at the site and based on field and laboratory investigation results, the following recommendations have been made for foundations of proposed constructions. 1. Shallow Foundations a) As Hard strata is met at shallow depth and taking both shear criteria & settlement criteria into consideration raft foundation/ isolated column footings should be adopted at the depths mentioned below with the following safe bearing capacities. BH No. Location Depth of foundation SBC from shear criteria (t/m 2 ) 7 SS-6B Area 2.50m & below 30 Note: 1. Filled up material if any should be removed and foundation should be from the natural ground level 2. Plinth beams are to be provided to safeguard the structure against differential settlements if any. b ) Due to presence of sulphates in water necessary precautions should be taken as per IS 456-2000. c) Back Filling material should be Rubble Soling and well compacted in layers of 150mm below PCC. For J.J.ASSOCIATES(VSKP) AETP (P) LTD., 6 J.J.ASSOCIATES (Vskp) AETP (P) LIMITED

J.J. ASSOCIATES(VISAKHAPATNAM)AETP(P) LIMITED 11-6-3,RockDale Layout, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam 530 002. Project : Proposed DHT project at Visakh Refinery. Date of Commencement : 1/4/2010 Location : SS-6B Date of completion : 6/4/2010 Bore hole : 7 Ground RL : +5.497 Ground Water Table : 1.93m Coordinates : N 556.394 E 1673.212 BORELOG Ground R.L. Depth Below G.L. From To From To +5.497 +4.497 +2.997-0.503 +4.497 +2.997-0.503-1.003 0.00 1.00 2.50 6.00 1.00 2.50 6.00 6.50 Visual Description of strata Filled up soil & boulders Reddish clay with pebbles Highly weathered rock Reddish clay with pebbles Thickness of Strata Type of sample RL & Depth at which sample collected GL GRL 1.00 DS-1 +4.497 1.00 1.50 3.50 SPT-1 DS-2 +2.997 2.50 SPT-2 DS-3 SPT-3 DS-4 +1.497-0.503 4.00 6.00 0.50 DS-5-1.003 6.50 RL & Depth at which SPT conducted GRL GL 15 cm SPT 30 cm 45 cm N- Value +3.997 1.50 3 5 8 13 +2.497 +0.997 3.00 4.50 8 49 52(5 cm pen.) 58(5cm pen.) >50 >50 Core recovery % RQD % Remarks UDS Undisturbed Sample DS Disturbed Sample SPT Standard Penetration Test pen. Penetration 1

J.J. ASSOCIATES(VISAKHAPATNAM)AETP(P) LIMITED 11-6-3,RockDale Layout, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam 530 002. Project : Proposed DHT project at Visakh Refinery. Date of Commencement : 1/4/2010 Location : SS-6B Date of completion : 6/4/2010 Bore hole : 7 Ground RL : +5.497 Ground Water Table : 1.93m Coordinates : N 556.394 E 1673.212 Ground R.L. Depth Below G.L. From To From To Visual Description of strata Thickness of Strata Type of sample RL & Depth at which sample collected GL GRL RL & Depth at which SPT SPT N- conducted Value GL 15 30 45 GRL cm cm cm -1.003 6.50 53(10cm pen.) >53 Core recovery % -1.003 6.50 SPT-4-2.003 7.50 DS-6-2.003 7.50 Nil Nil -2.003-3.003 7.50 8.50 DS-7-3.003 8.50 Nil Nil -3.003 8.50 SPT-5-3.003 8.50 56(5cm pen.) >50 Highly Nil Nil -4.503 10.00 DS-8-4.503 10.00 weathered 9.03-4.503-6.003 10.00 11.50 DS-9-6.003 11.50 3 Nil rock -6.003-6.503 11.50 12.00 SPT-6-6.003 11.50 73(10cm pen.) >73 2 Nil -6.503-7.503 12.00 13.00 DS-10-7.503 13.00 Nil Nil -7.503-9.003 13.00 14.50 SPT-7-7.503 13.00 81(8cm pen.) >81 Nil Nil -9.003-9.853 14.50 15.35 SPT-8-9.853 15.35 100(no pen.) >100 Nil Nil RQD % Remarks Borehole terminated at 15.35m below G.L. (i.e.) at R.L -9.853 UDS Undisturbed Sample DS Disturbed Sample SPT Standard Penetration Test pen. Penetration 2

J.J. ASSOCIATES(VISAKHAPATNAM) AETP(P) LIMITED #11-6-3, RockDale Layout, MaharaniPeta, Visakhapatnam 530 002. IDENTIFICATION & ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF SOIL Project : Proposed DHT project at HPCL, Visakh Refinery at Visakhapatnam Location : Proposed SS-6B Site. Sl No. BH No Sample No. 1 7 1 2 7 2 3 7 3 Type of sample RL & Depth at which sample collected GRL GL SPT +3.997 1.50 DS +2.997 2.50 Natural moisture content (%) Bulk Density (g/cc) Dry Density (g/cc) Gravel (%) Gradation Analysis FINES Sand (%) Silt Clay Liquid Limit (%) Consistency Limits Plastic Limit (%) Plastici ty Index (%) Triaxial Test UU C (kg/cm²) φ degree Specific gravity 9.76 - - 10.00 35.00 42.00 13.00 34 19 15 - - - CL 16.22 - - 0.00 61.00 32.00 7.00 24 13 11 - - 2.64 SC DS +1.497 4.00 - - - 0.00 90.00 10.00 NP - - - ISC -

J.J. ASSOCIATES (VISAKHAPATNAM) (P) LIMITED #11-6-3, Rock Dale Layout, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam 530 002. Project Location : Proposed DHT Project at Visakh Refinery. : SS-6B Area. CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF SOIL Depth at which Organic BH sample collected Sulphates Chlorides S.No. Pн Matter No. G.L % % G.R.L. % 1 7 +2.997 2.50 7.20 0.002 0.005 nil CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER Depth at which Organic BH sample collected Sulphates Chlorides S.No. Pн Matter No. G.L mg/l mg/l G.R.L. mg/l 1 7 +3.567 1.93 7.40 320 118 11

J.J. ASSOCIATES(VISAKHAPATNAM) AETP (P) LIMITED #11-6-3, Rock Dale Layout, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam 530 002. BORE LOG DETAILS Project Location : Proposed DHT Project at Visakh Refinery. : At Proposed SS-6B Site. BH-7 0.00 +5.497 Filled up soil & boulders 1.00 +4.497 Reddish clay N=13@+3.997 with pebbles 2.50 +2.997 Highly weathered rock 6.00-0.503 Reddish clay with pebbles 6.50-1.003 Highly weathered rock N>50@+2.497 N>50@+0.997 N>53@-1.003 N>50@-3.003 N>73@-6.003 N>81@-7.503 N>100@-9.853 15.35-9.853