STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
|
|
|
- Griffin Hoover
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 PAGE: 1 of 32 CONTENTS 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION* 2.0 METHOD SUMMARY 3.0 SAMPLE PRESERVATION, CONTAINERS, HANDLING AND STORAGE 3.1 Sample Storage 3.2 Holding Times 4.0 INTERFERENCES AND POTENTIAL PROBLEMS 5.0 EQUIPMENT/APPARATUS 6.0 REAGENTS* 7.0 PROCEDURES 7.1 GC/MS Operating Conditions 7.2 Bromofluorobenzene Tune 7.3 Initial Calibration 7.4 Continuing Calibration 7.5 Sample Analysis 7.6 Identification of Target Compounds 7.7 Library Search* 8.0 CALCULATIONS 8.1 Target Compounds 8.2 Tentatively Identified Compounds 8.3 Surrogate Spike Recoveries 8.4 Matrix Spike Recoveries 8.5 Laboratory Control Sample Recoveries
2 PAGE: 2 of 32 CONTENTS (cont) 9.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 10.0 DATA VALIDATION 11.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY 12.0 REFERENCES* 13.0 APPENDICES A - Tables 9.1 GC/MS Tuning and Performance Criteria 9.2 GC/MS Initial Calibration 9.3 GC/MS Continuing Calibration* 9.4 Method Blanks* 9.5 System Blank* 9.6 Surrogate Spike Analysis* 9.7 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate 9.8 Internal Standard Area Evaluation 9.9 Manual Integrations 9.10 Laboratory Control Sample 9.11 Initial Demonstration of Proficiency 9.12 Method Detection Limit Studies 9.13 Nonconformance Memo* 9.14 System Troubleshooting* * These sections affected by Revision 2.0 SUPERCEDES: SOP #1807; Revision 1.0; 09/08/05; U.S. EPA Contract EP-W
3 PAGE: 3 of SCOPE AND APPLICATION The objective of this Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is to provide the requirements for the routine gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric (GC/MS) analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in soil/sediment samples from environmental sites. This method is based on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods SW846/8000B and 8260B and those requirements set forth in the latest approved version of the National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Committee (NELAC) Quality Systems section. A list of target compounds routinely analyzed by the Scientific, Engineering, Response and Analytical Services (SERAS) Laboratory and the corresponding reporting limits (RLs) are provided in Table 1, Appendix A. This method can be used to identify and quantify most VOCs with boiling points below 200 degrees Centigrade ( o C) and are insoluble or slightly soluble in water. Such compounds include low molecular weight halogenated hydrocarbons, aromatic compounds, ketones, ethers, and carbon disulfide. This method may not be changed without the expressed approval of the Organic Group Leader, the Analytical Section Leader and the Quality Assurance Officer (QAO). Only those versions issued through the SERAS document control system may be used. Modifications made to the procedure due to interferences in the samples or for any other reason must be documented in the case narrative. 2.0 METHOD SUMMARY A 5-gram (g) aliquot of soil/sediment is weighed into a 40-milliliter (ml) Teflon-lined septum vial, 5 ml of commercially available water suitable for VOC analysis is added, and the sealed vial is placed in the autosampler. An additional 5-mL portion of commercially available water containing surrogate/internal standards is added by the autosampler. An inert gas bubbling through the solution using a heated purge for low concentration level effectively transfers the purgeable VOCs from the aqueous phase to the vapor phase. The vapor is then swept through a three sorbent bed trap where the VOCs are trapped. When purging is complete, the sorbent trap is heated and back flushed with helium to desorb the trapped target analytes onto a GC capillary column interfaced to a MS. The GC column is temperature programmed to separate the target analytes which are detected with the MS. Compounds eluting from the GC column are identified by comparing their measured mass spectra and retention times to reference spectra and retention times in a database. Reference spectra and retention times for analytes are obtained from the measurement of calibration standards under the same GC/MS operating conditions used for soil samples. The concentration of each identified analyte is measured by relating the MS response of the quantitation ion produced by that compound to the MS response of the quantitation ion produced by a compound used as an internal standard. Surrogate compounds, whose concentrations are known in every sample, are measured with the same internal standard calibration procedure. The medium concentration level is based on extracting a portion, typically 5-g of sample, with methanol. An aliquot of the methanol extract is added to a specific volume of commercially available water suitable for VOC analysis containing the surrogate and internal standards. 3.0 SAMPLE PRESERVATION, CONTAINERS, HANDLING AND STORAGE 3.1 Sample Storage
4 PAGE: 4 of 32 Samples are collected in 4-ounce (oz) Teflon-lined screw top containers. The samples must be protected from light and refrigerated at 4 o C (+ 2 o C) from the time of collection until analysis. VOC samples must be kept separate from standards to reduce any potential contamination. All samples must be kept refrigerated for the periods specified by the Task Leader (TL) or Work Assignment Manager (WAM) of the project. 3.2 Holding Times The analysis of soil/sediment samples for VOCs at SERAS must be completed within seven (7) days of sample collection; however, the holding time may be extended to 14 days from date of collection before any qualifiers are added to the data. 4.0 INTERFERENCES AND POTENTIAL PROBLEMS Impurities in the purge gas, organic compounds out-gassing from the plumbing ahead of the trap, and solvent vapors in the laboratory account for the majority of contamination problems. The analytical system must be demonstrated to be contaminant free by analyzing laboratory blanks. The use of non-teflon tubing, non-teflon thread sealants, or flow controllers with rubber components in the purging device is not allowed. Samples can be contaminated by diffusion of volatile organics (particularly fluorocarbons, acetone, and methylene chloride) through the septum seal into the sample during storage and handling. A field blank carried through sample collection, shipment, and storage serves as a check on such contamination. Carryover contamination may occur when samples containing high levels of target and non-target compounds are analyzed. This contamination can be reduced by rinsing the autosampler syringe, the concentrator sparger, and sampling lines with hot water. If an unusually concentrated sample is analyzed, the sorbent trap may be baked for approximately 10 minutes and system blanks analyzed. If contamination still persists, manufacturer purge and trap concentrator and/or GC/MS system bakeout suggestions are implemented. The laboratory where VOC analysis is performed should be completely free of solvents. Any solvents, or solvent waste containers, used or stored in the laboratory during the analysis must be kept in a vented hood or vented storage area. 5.0 EQUIPMENT/APPARATUS Micro syringes, 10-microliter (μl) and larger, inch inner diameter (ID) needle Syringes, 5, 10, 25 and 50-mL, gas tight with Luer end Glassware Vials - 40-mL, screw cap, with Teflon- lined septum Volumetric flasks - Class A with ground-glass stopper Vials - 2-mL with screw caps with Teflon-lined septum Inserts - 15-mL glass with O-ring for 40-mL vial Purge and trap device, consisting of Tekmar 3000 Concentrator and ARCHON autosampler system, or
5 PAGE: 5 of REAGENTS equivalent. Both units are commercially available and meet required specifications. VOCARB 3000 adsorbent trap, Supelco Catalog Number (No.) U or equivalent, used in the Tekmar 3000 Concentrator system containing three 60/80 mesh adsorbent beds [Carbopack B (10-centimeter [cm] granular graphitized carbon), Carboxen-1000 (6-cm spherical porous carbon) and Carboxen-1001 (1-cm spherical porous carbon)]. For initial conditioning, bake trap at 260 to 270 C for one hour prior to use. Hewlett-Packard (HP) 6890 GC/5973 MS, interfaced with a HP CHEM STATION data system or equivalent Restek Rtx-Volatiles capillary column, 30 meters (m) long, 0.25 millimeter (mm) ID, and 3.0 micron (μm) film thickness or equivalent Balance, capable of weighing to 0.01 grams, calibrated annually by an outside vendor Purge water, commercially available, suitable for VOC analysis Methanol, purge and trap quality Calibration Stock VOC Standard Solution, 250 micrograms per milliliter (μg/ml), available commercially (Accustandard Product S-4821or equivalent), consisting of 64 individual compounds (Table 1, Appendix A). Alternatively, the stock standard solution may be prepared from standard mixtures and individual compounds, which are commercially available. All mixtures are combined based on their concentrations to give a final concentration of 250 μg/ml. Calibration Working Standard, 25 μg/ml - Prepare a 1:10 dilution in methanol. Surrogate/Internal Standard Solution, commercially available (Accustandard QCLP-PIPS-0.1X or equivalent), consisting of three internal standard (Bromochloromethane, Chlorobenzene-d 5, and 1,4-Difluorobenzene) and three surrogate (1,2-Dichloroethane-d 4, Toluene-d 8, and 4-Bromofluorobenzene) compounds each at 250 μg/ml in methanol. Matrix Spike (MS) Stock Solution, commercially available (Supelco No or equivalent), consisting of the following compounds each at 2500 μg/ml in methanol: 1,1-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Chlorobenzene Toluene Benzene This solution must be a different source from that used for calibration. MS Intermediate Solution, 250 μg/ml - Prepare a 1:10 dilution in methanol.
6 PAGE: 6 of 32 MS Working Solution, 25 μg/ml - From the 250 μg/ml stock solution, prepare a 10-fold dilution in methanol. If stock or intermediate solutions of different concentration levels are used, appropriate dilutions must be made to give a final working solution of 25 μg/ml in methanol. 4-Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) Standard, 250 μg/ml, commercially available in methanol and must be diluted to the level of 50 μg/ml. Alternatively, the 250 μg/ml surrogate and internal standard, which contains 4-BFB, can be used. Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) - With each batch of twenty samples, prepare a LCS at a concentration of 50 micrograms per liter (μg/l) using the second source MS stock standard. On a quarterly basis, prepare a LCS from a second source stock standard containing all of the target compounds at a concentration of 50 μg/l. 7.0 PROCEDURES Helium, ultra high purity (99.999%) NOTE: All of the above mentioned standard solutions must be stored at -4 o C to -10 o C (freezer section of the standards refrigerator) in tightly capped vials with Teflon liners. Commercially prepared standard solutions that are received in sealed ampoules may be stored in the shelf section of the standards refrigerator. Fresh mixtures should be prepared when the percent drift of the gases and/or any other compounds (e.g., ketones) in the working standard mixture change by more than 20 percent (%) or at least every six months. NOTE: Premixed certified standards will be stored according to the manufacturer=s documented storage requirements. These standards may be kept in storage up to the manufacturer=s stated expiration date. Once the standard vials are opened, the standards will be stored with minimal headspace in the freezer for a period not to exceed six months or the manufacturer=s expiration date, whichever is less. NOTE: All calibration standards, surrogates, internal standards, and spiking solutions will be prepared and documented in accordance with SERAS SOP #1012, Preparation of Standard Solutions and Reagents. 7.1 GC/MS Operating Conditions The following GC/MS operating conditions are recommended: Mass Spectrometer/Data System, HP 5973 MS, equipped with a HP CHEM STATION data system. The conditions of the Electron Impact Ionization mass spectrometer are: Electron Energy: Mass Range: Scan Time: 70 volts (nominal) atomic mass units (amu) to give at least 5 scans per peak and not to exceed 3 seconds per scan. Gas Chromatograph/Capillary GC column, HP 6890 GC equipped with a 30 m x 0.25 mm ID, Rtx- Volatiles (Restek Corp.) capillary column with 3.0-μm film thickness using helium carrier gas at a flow
7 PAGE: 7 of 32 rate of 1.0 ml/minute (min). The column temperature is isothermal at 40 o C for 4 minutes, then programmed to ramp at 9 o C per minute to 165 o C and held for 2 minutes, then ramped at 12 o C per minute to 220 o C and held for 7 minutes. Inlet temperature is 150 o C. Source temperature is set according to manufacturer's specifications (230 C). Total run time is approximately 31 minutes. GC/MS Interface, capillary direct with 1 ml/min helium carrier gas at 250 o C. Purge and Trap Unit, Tekmar 3000 concentrator equipped with an ARCHON Autosampler. The purge and trap conditions are: Purge - 10 min at 35 o C Desorb - 4 min at 250 o C Purge Flow Rate - 40 ml/min Dry Purge - 2 min at ambient Desorb preheat at 245 C Bake - 10 min at 260 o C 7.2 Bromofluorobenzene Tune The autosampler adds 1 μl of the BFB solution to a 5-mL aliquot of commercially available water. This mixture (50 ng BFB) is purged and analyzed. The ion abundance criteria can be found in Table 2, Appendix A. The tune is acquired using either the apex or one scan. Background subtraction is required and must be accomplished using a single scan no more than 20 scans prior to the elution of the BFB. The BFB tune criteria must be met every 12 hours during sample analysis. If the software does not indicate what scan was subtracted, the analyst will document the scan number directly on the tune report. 7.3 Initial Calibration 1. Add 1 μl, 4 μl, 10 μl, 20 μl, 30 μl, and 40 μl of the calibration working standard solution (25 μg/ml) into 5-mL aliquots of commercially available water in 40-mL vials respectively, to prepare the initial calibration standards. Add sufficient methanol to bring the total volume to 40 μl in each standard (e.g., 4 μl standard + 36 μl methanol). This will result in a calibration curve of 5, 20, 50, 100, 150, and 200 μg/l. 2. The autosampler adds 1 μl of the surrogate/internal standard mixture (250 μg/ml) and an additional 5 ml of commercially available water to each 5-mL aliquot of the calibration standards. Purge and analyze each of the initial calibration standards using a heated purge. 3. Calculate and tabulate the relative response factor (RRF) against the concentration for each compound, including the surrogates, by using the equation below. The primary ion from the specific internal standard must be used for quantitation. The average RRF and percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) must also be calculated and tabulated. where: RRF A A x is C C is x A x = Area of the characteristic ion for the compound to be measured
8 PAGE: 8 of 32 A is = Area of the characteristic ion for the specific internal standard C is = Concentration of the internal standard (μg/l) C x = Concentration of the compound to be measured (μg/l) where: RRF n i 1 RRFi n RRF i n = relative response factor for each initial calibration level = total number of initial calibration levels % RSD SD i n SD x 100 X 1 N X The criteria for the average RRF and %RSD for each target analyte are found in Section Continuing Calibration 1 x 2 A check of the initial calibration curve must be performed every 12 hours after an acceptable BFB analysis. Sample analysis may begin only after a successful BFB tune and a continuing calibration check have been acquired. 1. Add 10 μl of the calibration working standard solution (25 μg/ml) into a 5-mL aliquot of commercially available water in a 40-mL vial containing a stirring bar to prepare the continuing calibration standard. 2. The autosampler adds 1 μl of the surrogate/internal standard mixture (250 μg/ml) and an additional 5 ml of commercially available water to the 5-mL aliquot of the continuing calibration standard. Purge and analyze the continuing calibration standard using the soil calibration method (heated purge). 3. Calculate and tabulate the continuing calibration RRF for each compound. 4. Calculate the percent difference (%D) for the continuing calibration RRF compared to the average RRF from the initial calibration curve. Percent Difference (%D)= A - A I A I C x 100
9 PAGE: 9 of 32 The criteria for the continuing RRF and %D are found in Section The extracted ion current profile (EICP) area for each internal standard in the continuing calibration must be compared to the internal standard area in the mid-point standard of the current initial calibration. The criterion for comparison is found in section Sample Analysis Prior to beginning data collection activities, i.e., analysis of calibration standards, blanks, and/or samples, it is necessary to verify that the GC/MS: Met the BFB ion abundance criteria listed in Table 2, Appendix A and in Section 9.1. The BFB tune criteria must be demonstrated every 12 hours by analyzing 50 ng of BFB. Successfully passed an initial six-point calibration and/or continuing calibration check. The continuing calibration check must be demonstrated every 12 hours during sample analysis by analyzing a 50 μg/l VOC standard. The method blanks, LCS, MS/matrix spike duplicate (MSD) and samples must be analyzed with the same instrument conditions used for the calibration standards. Load all samples into the ARCHON autosampler and use the appropriate autosampler method. The analyses are carried out in the following sequence: 1. Method Blank(s) - Add 5 ml of commercially available water and a stirring bar to a 40-mL Teflon-lined vial. 2. Low Level Sample - Weigh 5 g of sample into a 40-mL Teflon-lined vial with a stirring bar and add 5 ml of commercially available water suitable for VOCs. If the analyst has reason (e.g., history or screening result) to believe that diluting the sample will be necessary, an undiluted run may not be required. If a target analyte exceeds the linear calibration range, use the appropriate dilution factor needed to bring the concentration within range. This may be achieved using a smaller aliquot of sample (e.g., 0.5 g or 1 g). Ideally, the concentration of the analyte should fall midrange of the curve after dilution. 4. Medium Level Sample - Weigh 5 g of sample into a 40-mL Teflon-lined vial and add 10 ml of purge and trap grade methanol. The default amounts are 5 g and 10 ml, but may be adjusted based on the concentrations of target analytes present in the sample. Shake well and allow to settle until the phases are well separated. Prepare the medium level sample by using an appropriate volume of the methanol extract to 50 ml of commercially available water into a 50- ml volumetric flask. Transfer to a 40-mL Teflon-lined vial. The volume of methanol in the 5 ml sample purged should always be equal to 100 μl. Using the water method (ambient purge), analyze the sample. Prepare a methanol blank using 1000 μl of methanol and 49 ml of water. Transfer to a 40-mL vial. Purge 5 ml of this solution. The quantity of methanol extract required to prepare 50 ml of sample may be estimated as follows:
10 PAGE: 10 of 32 Approximate Concentration Range, micrograms per kilogram Volume of Methanol Extract, μl Volume of Methanol , ,000-20, , , , , of a 1:50 dilution 0 For an organic waste or product sample, weigh 1-g of sample into a 40-mL Teflon-lined vial and add an appropriate amount of purge and trap grade methanol (5-10 ml). Shake well to mix. Prepare the medium level sample by using an appropriate volume of the methanol extract to 50 ml of commercially available water into a 50-mL volumetric flask. Transfer to a 40-mL Teflonlined vial. The volume of methanol in the 5 ml sample purged should always be equal to 100 μl. Analyze using the water method (ambient purge). A methanol blank is also required for organic waste or product sample analysis. Prepare a methanol blank using 1000 μl of methanol and 49 ml of water. Transfer to a 40-mL vial. Purge 5 ml of this solution. 5. MS/MSD Samples - For low level samples, spike 10 μl of the working matrix spike solution (25 μg/ml) to 5 g of a selected sample in duplicate for MS/MSD analysis in a 40-mL Teflonlined vial. Add 5 ml of reagent water and a stirring bar. If samples are analyzed using the methanol extraction (medium level) technique, analyze a MS/MSD at the lowest dilution that the selected sample was analyzed. NOTE: If a sample was initially analyzed using the low level technique and a methanol dilution is required to bring one or more analytes within linear range, a separate MS/MSD using the medium level method is not required. The MS/MSD may be prepared by either of the following preparation methods: Add 10 μl of the 250 μg/ml MS intermediate solution, the volume of methanol extract used for the sample analysis and an appropriate volume (if necessary) of methanol to bring the total to 1000 μl in a 50-mL volumetric flask or syringe, containing commercially available water. Transfer contents to a 40-mL vial and purge 5 ml of the MS sample. Repeat the same for the MSD. Add 100 μl of the 25 μg/ml MS working solution, the volume of methanol extract used for the sample analysis and an appropriate volume (if necessary) of methanol to bring the total to 1000 μl in a 50-mL volumetric flask containing commercially available water. Transfer contents to a 40-mL vial and purge 5 ml of the MS sample. Repeat the same for the MSD. 6. LCS - Spike 10 μl of the MS working solution (25 μg/ml) into 5 ml of water in a 40-mL Teflon lined vial containing a stirring bar.
11 PAGE: 11 of 32 If samples are analyzed using the methanol extraction (medium level) technique, analyze a LCS at the frequency of one in 20 samples using one of the preparation methods below. 7.6 Identification of Target Compounds Add 10 μl of the 250 μg/ml MS intermediate solution and 990 μl of methanol to bring the total to 1000 μl in a 50-mL volumetric flask or syringe containing commercially available water. Transfer contents to a 40-mL vial and purge 5 ml of the LCS sample. Add 100 μl of the 25 μg/ml MS working solution and 900 μl methanol in a 50-mL volumetric flask containing commercially available water. Transfer contents to a 40-mL vial and purge 5 ml of the LCS sample. Target compound identification will be made by comparison of the sample mass spectrum to the mass spectrum of a standard of the target compound. Two criteria must be satisfied to verify the identification: Elution of the sample component at the same GC relative retention time as the standard component Correspondence of the sample component and standard component mass spectra 1. For establishing correspondence of the GC relative retention times (RRTs), the sample component RRTs must compare within RRTs units of the RRTs of the standard component. For reference, the calibration standard must be analyzed within the same 12-hour time period as the sample. If co-elution of interfering components prohibits accurate assignment of the sample component RRTs from the total ion chromatogram, the RRTs should be assigned by using extracted ion current profiles for ions unique to the component of interest. 2. For comparison of standard and sample component mass spectra, reference mass spectra must be obtained from the analysis of the 50 μg/l calibration standard. These standard spectra may be obtained from the calibration run used to obtain reference RRTs and daily relative response factors. 3. The requirements for qualitative verification by comparison of mass spectra are as follows: a. All ions present in the standard mass spectra at a relative intensity greater than 10% (most abundant ion in the spectrum equals 100%) must be present in the sample spectrum. Characteristic ions from reference mass spectra are the two or three ions of greatest intensity. b. The relative intensities of ions specified in (a) must agree within + 20% between the standard and sample spectra. For example, for an ion with an abundance of 50% in the standard spectra, the corresponding sample ion abundance must be between 30 and 70%. c. Ions greater than 10% in the sample spectrum but not present in the standard spectrum must be considered and accounted for by the analyst making the comparison. All
12 PAGE: 12 of 32 compounds meeting the identification criteria must be reported with their spectra. For all compounds below the reporting limits, report the actual value followed by "J", e.g., "3J". 4. If a compound cannot be verified by all of the criteria in Step 3, but in the technical judgment of the mass spectral interpretation specialist the identification is correct, then the analyst shall report that identification and proceed with calculation in Section 8.0. The analyst should report in the case narrative that technical judgment was utilized. 7.7 Library Search A library search will be performed for non-target compounds present in the method blank and the samples for the purpose of tentative identification. The 1998 release of the NIST/EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library (NIST98.L) containing more than 100,000 spectra will be used. 1. Any non-surrogate organic compounds not listed in Table 1, Appendix A shall be tentatively identified via a forward search of the NIST/EPA/NIH mass spectral library. Substances with responses less than 10% of the nearest internal standard are not required to be searched. Only after visual comparison of sample spectra with the nearest library searches will the mass spectral interpretation specialist assign a tentative identification. NOTE: Computer generated library search routines must not use normalization routines that would misrepresent the library or unknown spectra when compared to each other. 2. Guidelines for making tentative identification: Relative intensities of major ions in the reference spectrum (ions greater than 10% of the most abundant ion) should be present in the sample spectrum. The relative intensities of the major ions should agree within + 20% between the standard and sample spectra. For example, if an ion has an abundance of 50% in the standard spectra, the corresponding sample ion abundance must be between 30 and 70%. Molecular ions present in reference spectrum should be present in sample spectrum. Ions present in the sample spectrum but not in the reference spectrum should be reviewed for possible background contamination or presence of chelating compounds. Ions present in the reference spectrum but not in the sample spectrum should be reviewed for possible subtraction from the sample spectrum because of background contamination or co-eluting compounds. NOTE: Data system library reduction programs can sometimes create these discrepancies. 3. If all the above conditions for a compound are met and if the Q value of the search is 80%, that compound will be reported as a tentatively identified compound (TIC). If the Q value is <80%
13 PAGE: 13 of CALCULATIONS 8.1 Target Compounds or the mass spectral interpretation specialist indicates that no valid tentative identification can be made, the compound should be reported as unknown. The mass spectral specialist should give additional classification of the unknown compound, if possible (i.e., unknown phthalate, unknown hydrocarbon, unknown acid, unknown chlorinated compound). If probable molecular weights can be distinguished, include them on the TIC report. Report only one type of unknown compound per retention time (RT). Do not report carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), target compounds, internal standards or surrogates as a TIC. Identified target analytes must be quantitated by the internal standard method. The internal standard used must be the one nearest the retention time to that of a given analyte listed in Table 3, Appendix A. The extracted ion current profile (EICP) area of the characteristic ion of each target analyte listed in Table 4, Appendix A is used for quantitation. Use the following equation to calculate the concentration of the identified analytes using the average RRF obtained from the initial calibration as described in Section 7.3. A compound=s concentration will be calculated using the formulas: Low Level Sample Concentration C C ( g/kg) A A IS C I IS RRF V avg T W DF S S where: C c = Compound concentration in μg/kg dry weight A c = Area of the characteristic ion for the compound I is = Amount of internal standard in nanograms (ng) DF = Dilution factor A is = Area of the characteristic ion for the internal standard RRF avg = Average Relative Response Factor from the soil method W s = Weight of sample purged in grams S = Decimal percent solid = (100 - % moisture)/100 Medium Level Sample Concentration C c where: ( g/kg) = ( Ac )( I is ) Vt 100(DF) ( Ais )(RRF) W (V a ) S S
14 PAGE: 14 of 32 C c = Compound concentration in μg/kg dry weight A c = Area of the characteristic ion for the compound I is = Amount of internal standard in nanograms (ng) DF = Dilution factor A is = Area of the characteristic ion for the internal standard RRF avg = Average Relative Response Factor from the water method W s = Weight of sample purged in grams S = Decimal percent solid = (100 - % moisture)/100 Vt = Total volume of methanol extract in ml (typically 5 to 10 ml) Va = Volume in μl of methanol extract added to 5 ml reagent water 1000 = Conversion factor from ml to μl The following EPA-defined flags will be used in the lab to qualify data: U: This flag indicates that the compound was analyzed for but not detected J: This flag indicates an estimated value under the sample RL. Any concentration less than 25% of the RL will not be reported B: This flag is used when the analyte is found in the associated method blank as well as in the sample E: This flag identifies compounds whose concentrations exceed the upper calibration range of the instrument All target concentrations are reported to three significant figures. For any concentrations reported from diluted runs, be sure to report the corresponding RL. For example, if a compound is run at a 10x dilution to bring the concentration within linear range, the RL must be reported at 50 μg/kg instead of 5 μg/kg. 8.2 Tentatively Identified Compounds An estimated concentration for tentatively identified compounds (TICs) must be calculated by the internal standard method. The nearest preceding internal standard free of interferences must be used. The equation for calculating the concentration is the same as in Section 8.1, except that area count or peak height of the TICs and their assigned internal standards from the total ion chromatogram is used for calculation. The RRF of both is assumed to be 1.0. All non-target concentrations are reported to one significant figure for concentrations less than 10 and two significant figures for all concentrations greater than or equal to Surrogate Spike Recoveries Calculate surrogate standard recovery on all samples, blanks, and spikes by the following equation: Percent Recovery(%R)= Q Q D A x 100
15 PAGE: 15 of 32 where: Q D Q A = Quantity determined by analysis = Quantity added to sample 8.4 Matrix Spike Recoveries Accuracy is calculated from the recovery of the MS/MSDs. Precision is calculated from the relative percent difference (RPD) of the recoveries measured for the MS/MSD pair. Matrix spike recoveries and RPD will be calculated by the following equations: Matrix Spike Recovery (%R) = SSR - SR SA x 100 where: SSR = Concentration of target analyte in spike sample (spiked) SR = Concentration of target analyte in sample (unspiked) SA = Concentration of spike added and RPD = MSR- MSDR x 100 (MSR+ MSDR)/2 where: RPD = Relative percent difference MSR = Matrix spike recovery MSDR = Matrix spike duplicate recovery Percent recoveries will be calculated to the nearest whole percentage. RPDs will be calculated to one significant figure below 1.0 and two significant figures above 1.0. Note: RPD is always expressed as a positive value. 8.5 Laboratory Control Sample Recoveries The recoveries of each of the compounds in the LCS solution will be calculated using the following equation: Laboratory Control where: Sample Re covery %R LCSR SA B x 100 LCSR = Concentration of target analyte in LCS
16 PAGE: 16 of 32 B = Concentration of target analyte in blank SA = Concentration of spike added Percent recoveries will be calculated to the nearest whole percentage. 9.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 9.1 GC/MS Tuning and Performance Criteria The GC/MS must be tuned with BFB and the ion abundance criteria listed in Table 2, Appendix A must be met prior to any standard, blank or sample analysis. In addition, the criteria must be achieved during every 12-hour period during which standards, blanks, and samples are analyzed. The 12-hour time period for GC/MS tuning begins at the time of injection of the BFB analysis that the laboratory submits as documentation of a compliant tune. 9.2 GC/MS Initial Calibration A minimum mean response factor for the following volatile system performance check compounds (SPCCs) must be met: Chloromethane ,1-Dichloroethane 0.10 Bromoform 0.10 Chlorobenzene ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.30 All other compounds must meet a minimum mean RF of The %RSD should be less than or equal to 15% for each target analyte with the exception of the calibration check compounds (CCCs). The %RSD for the CCCs must be equal to or less than 30% for the following compounds: 1,1-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichloropropane Toluene Ethylbenzene Vinyl chloride Corrective action must be taken if any of the CCCs or SPCCs do not meet criteria. Once these criteria have been met, blanks and samples may be analyzed. Any deviations must be documented in the case narrative. If the RSDs exceed criteria, then linearity through the origin cannot be assumed. A linear regression analysis plot not forced through Azero@ may be used to calculate concentrations using area counts on the Ay@ axis as the dependent variable versus concentrations on the AX@ axis as the independent variable. At the SERAS Laboratory, Chemstation EnviroQuant software is used. The coefficient of determination (r 2 ) must be greater than 0.98.
17 PAGE: 17 of 32 NOTE: All initial calibration standards must be analyzed prior to the analysis of any method blanks, QC samples or environmental samples. 9.3 GC/MS Continuing Calibration After 12 hours of sample acquisition have passed, the GC/MS must be re-tuned using BFB, and the initial calibration curve verified by the mid-level calibration standard. 1. The BFB tune must pass the criteria in Table 2, Appendix A. 2. The 50 μg/l calibration standard must be used for the continuing calibration. 3. The %D should be less than or equal to 20% for each target analyte with the exception of the CCCs that must be equal to or less than 20% for the following compounds: 1,1-Dichloroethene Chloroform 1,2-Dichloropropane Toluene Ethylbenzene Vinyl chloride 4. A minimum response factor for the following volatile SPCCs must be met: Chloromethane 0.10 Chlorobenzene ,1-Dichloroethane ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.30 Bromoform 0.10 All other compounds must meet a minimum mean RF of For any target compounds present in the sample at a concentration greater than the RL, those analytes in the continuing calibration must meet the minimum RRF of 0.05 and the %D criteria of 20%. 5. The EICP area for each internal standard in the continuing calibration must be between 50% and 200% of the respective internal standard EICP area in the mid-point standard of the current initial calibration. If this criterion is not met, re-analysis is required. 6. A maximum of two continuing calibrations may be run to meet the requirements in item 3 above. A new calibration curve must be reanalyzed if both continuing calibrations are unacceptable. If the instrument is set up on an overnight run with two continuing calibrations back to back and the first continuing calibration passes but the second one fails, refer to Section 9.14, System Troubleshooting. It is not acceptable to use the first continuing calibration if the second continuing calibration is out. 7. If any of the requirements listed in Step 3 are not met, notify the Organic Group Leader and/or Analytical Section Leader.
18 PAGE: 18 of Method Blank 1. A method blank is 5 ml of commercially available water and internal standard/surrogate mix carried through the entire analytical scheme. For the medium level analysis (methanol dilution), the method blank volume must be 100 μl of methanol in 5 ml of purge water. 2. A method blank analysis must be performed every 12 hours and must be analyzed immediately after calibration and prior to the analysis of any samples. 3. The method blank must contain less than the RL of all volatile target compounds, and less than five times the RLs of acetone, 2-butanone and methylene chloride. A maximum of two method blanks may be run. If both method blanks fail, the source of the contamination must be investigated prior to re-tuning the instrument. 9.5 System Blank NOTE: If the instrument is set up on an overnight run with two method blanks back to back and the first method blank passes but the second one fails, the source of the contamination must be investigated prior to re-tuning the instrument. It is not acceptable to use the first method blank if the second method blank is out. The source of the contamination must be investigated and corrective action implemented. A system blank may be run after any samples or dilutions that contain a level of target analyte exceeding the initial calibration range to ensure that there is no carryover from a previous sample. If samples are run after a system blank, the system blank must be free of the contaminants which are being quantitated in the subsequent samples. 9.6 Surrogate Spike Analysis 1. Each sample, LCS, MS, MSD and blank are spiked with surrogate compounds prior to purging at a concentration of 50 μg/kg. Deviations from the spiking protocol are not permitted. 2. The surrogate compound upper and lower percent recovery limits are listed below. If the sample surrogate recoveries do not meet the criteria, the affected sample must be reanalyzed to establish whether the non-conformance was due to the sample matrix or to a laboratory problem. If upon reanalysis of the sample, the surrogate recoveries fall within the QC limits, the problem was within the laboratory=s control. Submit only the data from the analysis with the surrogate recoveries within the QC limits. This shall be considered the initial analysis and reported in the data package. If the analysis is outside the holding time, both sets of data will be submitted. Sample results will be evaluated based on the surrogate and the associated target compounds. If upon reanalysis, the surrogates still fall outside QC limits, submit both sets of data. Distinguish between the initial and reanalysis in the data package.
19 PAGE: 19 of 32 The client-specified surrogate recovery limits are taken from the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Statement of Work (revision 5/99) and are as follows: % Recoveries 1,2-Dichloroethane-d Toluene-d p-bromofluorobenzene If blank surrogate recoveries do not meet criteria, reanalysis of all affected samples is required. 9.7 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate 1. A MS/MSD must be analyzed every 10 samples or per project. The MS/MSD must be associated with a method blank that meets the criteria in section 9.4, a calibration in sections 9.2 and 9.3 and a tune in section 9.1. The MS/MSD must be run on the same instrument that the sample was analyzed on at the lowest dilution reported for the sample. The MS/MSDs should be run on the same 12-hour shift as the sample. Separate MS/MSDs must be run for low level versus medium level samples as described in Section 7.5 step The client-specified MS recovery limits are taken from the Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) Statement of Work (revision 5/99) and are as follows: % Recovery RPD 1,1-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Benzene Toluene Chlorobenzene State in case narrative if the recoveries are outside criteria. If more than half of the spiked compounds are out, the MS/MSD should be reanalyzed. A matrix effect is indicated if the LCS data are within limits but the MS/MSD are not. A similar pattern must be observed for both the MS and MSD. If the lab fails to meet the QC recovery limits and/or the RPD on a routine basis, the Organics Group Leader must investigate the cause and take corrective action. The MS/MSD must be prepared at the same dilution as the least diluted analysis from which sample results will be reported. 9.8 Internal Standard Area Evaluation 1. The extracted ion current profile (EICP) of the internal standards must be monitored and evaluated for each sample, blank, LCS, MS and MSD. 2. If samples, blanks, LCS or MS/MSDs are analyzed immediately following an initial calibration but before another BFB tune and a continuing calibration, evaluation will be conducted on the
20 PAGE: 20 of 32 basis of the internal standard areas of the 50 μg/l initial calibration standard. 3. If samples, blanks, LCS or MS/MSDs are analyzed immediately following a BFB tune and a continuing calibration, evaluation will be conducted on the basis of the internal standard areas in the continuing calibration standard. 4. The EICP area for each internal standard in all samples, blanks, and matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates must be between 50% and 200% of the respective internal standard EICP area in the appropriate calibration standard. In addition, the retention time of each internal standard must be within 0.50 minutes (30 seconds) of its retention time in the continuing calibration standard. 5. If one or more internal standard EICP areas do not meet criteria, the GC/MS system must be inspected for malfunctions and corrections made as appropriate. When corrections are made, reanalysis of all affected samples is required. 6. If after reanalysis, the EICP areas for all internal standards meet criteria (between 50% and 200%), then the problem with the first analysis is considered to have been within the control of the laboratory. Therefore, only data from the analysis with EICPs within the limits are required to be submitted. If reanalysis confirms matrix effects, submit both sets of data but report the initial run. 9.9 Manual Integrations Manual integration of all target analytes, surrogates, and internal standards will be submitted for review. The manual integration results will be flagged with a AM@ and will be initialed and dated by the analyst and group leader indicating that the integration was performed properly. Documentation of the manual integration of quantitation ion peaks must be included in the data package. Refer to SERAS SOP #1001, Chromatographic Peak Integration Procedures Laboratory Control Sample 1. A LCS must be analyzed every 20 samples or per batch. The LCS must be prepared at 50 μg/kg from the second source. The LCS must be associated with a method blank that meets the criteria in section 9.4, a calibration in sections 9.2 and 9.3 and a tune in section The QC limits for the LCS recoveries are listed below. % Recovery 1,1-Dichloroethene Trichloroethene Benzene Toluene Chlorobenzene State in case narrative the recoveries are outside criteria. On a quarterly basis, a LCS will be prepared and run that contains all of the target analytes. The above limits will be used until the
21 PAGE: 21 of 32 first 20 points are available to prepare a control chart. At that point, control and warning limits will be calculated every 10 to 20 points and updated at least quarterly. If the lab fails to meet the QC recovery limits on a routine basis, the Organics Group Leader and/or Analytical Section Leader must investigate the cause and take corrective action Initial Demonstration of Capability Initial proficiency in VOC analysis must be demonstrated by each analyst initially and each time significant changes are made in the procedure or for instrumentation. Each analyst will generate precision and accuracy data using a reference standard other than the source used for calibration. Four replicates of a well-mixed reference standard is analyzed using the procedures outlined in this SOP. Calculate the average mean in μg/kg and the standard deviation (s) in μg/kg. The QAO will tabulate the results from all of the analysts per matrix per parameter, and calculate control limits Method Detection Limit Studies Method detection limit (MDL) studies will be run on an annual basis for each VOC instrument for the soil matrix to verify the minimum concentration that can be measured and reported with 99% confidence. A minimum of seven replicates will be used for the study (EPA 1984) Nonconformance Memo A nonconformance memo will be generated any time an employee notices a deficiency suspected of being a nonconformance. This nonconformance memo will be forwarded to the Quality Assurance Officer for verification of corrective action System Troubleshooting 10.0 DATA VALIDATION Re-calibration must take place when performance changes are to the point when that the calibration verification criteria cannot be achieved. The following examples of maintenance do not require automatic re-calibration of the instrument with an initial calibration: changing compressed gas cylinders or syringes; baking the trap, transfer line or column; or flushing the system with multiple system blanks. If these types of maintenance rectify the problem, the instrument may be re-tuned and a continuing calibration is run. If the continuing calibration fails, then a new initial calibration must be run. Maintenance activities that require automatic re-calibration of the instrument using an initial calibration include, changing, replacing or reversing the column; replacing the trap on a purge-and-trap; changing the entrance lens, draw out lens, or repeller; changing the electron multiplier and ion source chamber. All maintenance activities must be documented in the instrument-specific preventive maintenance log. Data will be assessed for usability in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the most current version of SERAS SOP #1015, Data Validation Procedures for Routine Volatile Organic Analysis. However, data is considered
22 PAGE: 22 of 32 satisfactory for submission when all the requirements mentioned in Section 9.0 are met HEALTH AND SAFETY When working with potentially hazardous materials, refer to EPA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and corporate health and safety practices. More specifically, refer to SERAS SOP #3013, SERAS Laboratory Safety Program and SERAS SOP #1501, Hazardous Waste Management REFERENCES National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Committee (NELAC), Quality Systems, current approved version. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, 3 rd ed., Method 8000B. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, 3 rd ed., Method 8260B. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Statement of Work for Organic Analysis, Document Number OLM04.2, Contract Laboratory Program. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Federal Register, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 136, Appendix B, Definition and Procedure of the Determination of the Method Detection Limit - Revision 1.11, October 26, APPENDICES A - Tables
23 PAGE: 23 of 32 APPENDIX A
24 PAGE: 24 of 32 Tables SOP #1807 January 2006
25 PAGE: 25 of 32 TABLE 1. Target Compound List (TCL) COMPOUND RL (μg/kg) Dichlorodifluoromethane 5.00 Chloromethane 5.00 Vinyl Chloride 5.00 Bromomethane 5.00 Chloroethane 5.00 Trichlorofluoromethane 5.00 Acetone ,1-Dichloroethene 5.00 Methylene Chloride 5.00 Carbon Disulfide 5.00 Methyl-tert-butyl Ether 5.00 trans-1,2-dichloroethene ,1-Dichloroethane Butanone ,2-Dichloropropane 5.00 cis-1,2-dichloroethene 5.00 Chloroform ,1-Dichloropropene ,2-Dichloroethane ,1,1-Trichloroethane 5.00 Carbon Tetrachloride 5.00 Benzene 5.00 Trichloroethene ,2-Dichloropropane 5.00 Bromodichloromethane 5.00 Dibromomethane 5.00 cis-1,3-dichloropropene 5.00 trans-1,3-dichloropropene ,1,2-Trichloroethane ,3-Dichloropropane 5.00 Dibromochloromethane ,2-Dibromoethane 5.00 Bromoform Methyl-2-Pentanone 5.00 Toluene 5.00
26 PAGE: 26 of 32 TABLE 1. Target Compound List (TCL) (cont=d) COMPOUND RL (μg/kg) 2-Hexanone 5.00 Tetrachloroethene 5.00 Chlorobenzene ,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.00 Ethylbenzene 5.00 p & m-xylene 10.0 o-xylene 5.00 Styrene 5.00 Isopropylbenzene ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ,2,3-Trichloropropane 5.00 n-propylbenzene 5.00 Bromobenzene ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Chlorotoluene Chlorotoluene 5.00 tert-butylbenzene ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.00 sec-butylbenzene 5.00 p-isoproyltoluene ,3-Dichlorobenzene ,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.00 n-butylbenzene ,2-Dichlorobenzene ,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5.00 Hexachlorobutadiene 5.00 Naphthalene ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5.00
27 PAGE: 27 of 32 TABLE 2. GC/MS Performance Standard Bromofluorobenzene (BFB) m/z Ion Abundance Criteria % of mass % of mass Base peak, 100% relative abundance % of mass Less than 2.0% of mass % of mass % of mass % of mass % of mass 176
28 PAGE: 28 of 32 TABLE 3. List of Internal Standards with Corresponding Target Compounds and Surrogates Assigned for Quantitation Bromochloromethane 1,4-Difluorobenzene Chlorobenzene-d 5 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane Acetone 1,1-Dichloroethene Methylene Chloride Carbon Disulfide Methyl-tert-butyl Ether trans-1,2-dichloroethene 1,1-Dichloroethane 2-Butanone 2,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,2-dichloroethene Chloroform 1,1-Dichloropropene 1,2-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane-d 4 (surr.) surr. - surrogate compound 1,1,1-Trichloroethane Carbon Tetrachloride Benzene Trichloroethene 1,2-Dichloropropane Bromodichloromethane Dibromomethane cis-1,3-dichloropropene trans-1,3-dichloropropene 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1,3-Dichloropropane Dibromochloromethane 1,2-Dibromoethane Bromoform 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone Toluene-d 8 (surr.) Toluene 2-Hexanone Tetrachloroethene Chlorobenzene 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane Ethylbenzene p & m-xylene o-xylene Styrene Isopropylbenzene 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane p-bromofluorobenzene (surr.) 1,2,3-Trichloropropane n-propylbenzene Bromobenzene 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 2-Chlorotoluene 4-Chlorotoluene tert-butylbenzene 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene sec-butylbenzene p-isoproyltoluene 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1,4-Dichlorobenzene n-butylbenzene 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Hexachlorobutadiene Naphthalene 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
29 PAGE: 29 of 32 TABLE 4. List of Characteristic Ions for Target, Internal Standard and Surrogate Compounds COMPOUND PRIMARY ION SECONDARY ION(S) Bromochloromethane (I) , 130 Dichlorodifluoromethane Chloromethane Vinyl Chloride Bromomethane Chloroethane Trichlorofluoromethane Acetone ,1-Dichloroethene 96 61, 98 Methylene Chloride 84 49, 86 Carbon Disulfide Methyl tert-butyl Ether 73 57, 41 trans-1,2-dichloroethene 61 96, 98 1,1-Dichloroethane Butanone ,2-Dichloropropane cis-1,2-dichloroethene Chloroform ,1-Dichloropropene 75 77, 110 1,2-Dichloroethane ,2-Dichloroethane-d 4 (S) ,4-Difluorobenzene (I) ,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 99, 61 Carbon Tetrachloride Benzene Trichloroethene , 95 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 62, 76 Bromodichloromethane Dibromomethane , 172 cis-1,3-dichloropropene 75 77, 110 trans-1,3-dichloropropene 75 77, 110 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 97 83, 99 1,3-Dichloropropane Dibromochloromethane ,2-Dibromoethane (I) - Internal Standard (S) - Surrogate
30 PAGE: 30 of 32 TABLE 4. List of Characteristic Ions for Target, Internal Standard and Surrogate Compounds (cont) COMPOUND PRIMARY ION SECONDARY ION(S) Bromoform Chlorobenzene-d 5 (I) Methyl-2-Pentanone Toluene-d 8 (S) Toluene Hexanone 43 58, 100 Tetrachloroethene , 129 Chlorobenzene ,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane , 95 Ethylbenzene p & m-xylene o-xylene Styrene Isopropylbenzene ,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 85, 131 p-bromofluorobenzene (S) ,2,3-Trichloropropane , 97 n-propylbenzene Bromobenzene , 158 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene Chlorotoluene Chlorotoluene tert-butylbenzene , 134 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene sec-butylbenzene p-isopropyltoluene , 134 1,3-Dichlorobenzene , 111 1,4-Dichlorobenzene , 111 n-butylbenzene 91 92, 134 1,2-Dichlorobenzene , 111 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene , 145 Hexachlorobutadiene , 227 Naphthalene , 129 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene , 145 (I) - Internal Standard (S) - Surrogate
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
PAGE: 1 of 47 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 2.0 METHOD SUMMARY 2.1 Air Analysis 2.2 Headspace Analysis 2.3 Field Screening CONTENTS 3.0 SAMPLE PRESERVATION, CONTAINERS, HANDLING, AND STORAGE 3.1 Air Samples
Draft Data Validation Plan Review Form Tier II
Draft Data Validation Plan Review Form Tier II This Plan Review Form is # of forms completed in the review of this closure plan. Facility Name ID Number Date Review of Report is Completed Validator/DO
Methods 8260C and 8270D on a Single GCMS without Changing Columns
Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer No. GCMS-1302 Methods 8260C and 8270D on a Single GCMS without Changing Columns Introduction USEPA Methods 8260C (volatile) and 8270D (semi-volatile) typically require
Fast Continuous Online Analysis of VOCs in Ambient Air using Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD and Markes TD
Fast Continuous Online Analysis of VOCs in Ambient Air using Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD and Markes TD Application Note Environmental Author Xiaohua Li Agilent Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 412 Ying Lun
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Remediation Management Response Site Remediation Program
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Remediation Management Response Site Remediation Program NJDEP- SRP Low Level USEPA TO-15 Method (NJDEP-LLTO-15-3/2007) March 2007 March 2009
Appendix C Data Validation Report
Appendix C Data Validation Report INTRODUCTION Basis for the Data Validation This report summarizes the results of the summary (Level III) data validation performed on sediment, water, and quality control
Certifications: New York (EPA: NY00906, ELAP: 11078), New Jersey (NY026), Connecticut (PH-0337), Massachusetts (M-NY906), Virginia (1884)
Pace Analytical e-report *Issuance of this report is prior to full data package. Report prepared for: ARCADIS 6723 TOWPATH RD SYRACUSE, NY 324 CONTACT: DON SAUDA ----------------------------------------------
South Dakota s Statewide Ground Water Quality Monitoring Network
South Dakota s Statewide Ground Water Quality Monitoring Network Derric L. Iles State Geologist Geological Survey Program Department of Environment and Natural Resources 2014 Eastern South Dakota Water
1.2 This TAP is applicable to concrete, charcoal, coral, debris, wipes and soil.
March 2012 8 1 of 17 1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This procedure describes the preparation and analysis of solid matrices and wipe samples. 1.2 This TAP is applicable to concrete, charcoal, coral, debris, wipes and soil.
Introduction. The following definitions may help you better understand the components of the data report.
Introduction This document is designed to help our clients understand the quality control requirements and limitations of data reporting. There are three sections to this document. The first section will
METHOD 8020A AROMATIC VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
METHOD 8020A AROMATIC VOLATILE ORGANICS BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 Method 8020 is used to determine the concentration of various aromatic volatile organic compounds. The following
Determination of Haloacetic Acids and Dalapon in Drinking Water by SPE and GC/ECD*
Method 552.1 Revision 1.0 Determination of Haloacetic Acids and Dalapon in Drinking Water by SPE and GC/ECD* UCT Products: EUQAX156 (quaternary amine with Cl - counter ion, 6 ml cartridge)** CLTTP050 (CLEAN-THRU
Version 1.0 September, 2008. Jean W. Munch and Paul E. Grimmett
EPA/600/R-08/101 METHOD 522 DETERMINATION OF 1,4-DIOXANE IN DRINKING WATER BY SOLID PHASE EXTRACTION (SPE) AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/ MASS SPECTROMETRY (GC/MS) WITH SELECTED ION MONITORING (SIM) Version 1.0
GC/MS Analysis of Vanillin and Ethyl Vanillin in Distilled Spirits
Issue Implementation Page 1 of 7 GC/MS Analysis of Vanillin and Ethyl Vanillin in Distilled Spirits Scope and Application This method will determine the level of vanillin and ethyl vanillin in distilled
1.1 This test method covers the qualitative and quantitative determination of the content of benzene and toluene in hydrocarbon wax.
Standard Method for Analysis of Benzene and Toluene Content in Hydrocarbon Waxes by Headspace Gas Chromatography EWF METHOD 002/03 (Version 1 Reviewed 2015) 1 Scope 1.1 This test method covers the qualitative
ß-CYCLODEXTRIN SYNONYMS
ß-CYCLODEXTRIN Prepared at the 44th JECFA (1995), published in FNP 52 Add 3 (1995) superseding specifications prepared at the 41st JECFA (1993), published in FNP 52 Add 2 (1993). Metals and arsenic specifications
Analysis of Liquid Samples on the Agilent GC-MS
Analysis of Liquid Samples on the Agilent GC-MS I. Sample Preparation A. Solvent selection. 1. Boiling point. Low boiling solvents (i.e. b.p. < 30 o C) may be problematic. High boiling solvents (b.p. >
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
PAGE: 1 of 33 CONTENTS 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 2.0 METHOD SUMMARY 3.0 SAMPLE PRESERVATION, CONTAINERS, HANDLING, AND STORAGE 4.0 INTERFERENCES AND POTENTIAL PROBLEMS 5.0 EQUIPMENT/APPARATUS 6.0 REAGENTS
APPENDIX C. DATA VALIDATION REPORT
APPENDIX C. DATA VALIDATION REPORT T-117 Upland Investigation Upland Investigation Data Report Appendices PROJECT NARRATIVE Basis for the Data Validation This report summarizes the results of the validation
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
STANDARD OPERATING PROEDURES G/MS ANALYSIS OF SORBENT TUBES AND ANISTERS PAGE: 1 of 35 ONTENTS 1.0 SOPE AND APPLIATION 2.0 METHOD SUMMARY 2.1 Sorbent Tubes 2.2 anisters 3.0 SAMPLE PRESERVATION, ONTAINERS,
Chemistry 321, Experiment 8: Quantitation of caffeine from a beverage using gas chromatography
Chemistry 321, Experiment 8: Quantitation of caffeine from a beverage using gas chromatography INTRODUCTION The analysis of soft drinks for caffeine was able to be performed using UV-Vis. The complex sample
APPENDIX II TIER I CHECKLIST
APPENDIX II TIER I CHECKLIST Data Validation PRF - Tier I Page 1 Data Validation Plan Review Form Tier I This Plan Review Form is # 1 of 1 forms completed in the review of this closure plan. Facility Name
ACETALDEHYDE and ISOVALERALDEHYDE (Gas Chromatography)
ACETA.02-1 ACETALDEHYDE and ISOVALERALDEHYDE (Gas Chromatography) PRINCIPLE Isovaleraldehyde (IVA) and acetaldehyde are released from the syrup with the aid of dilute phosphoric acid and heat. The liberated
ASSURING THE QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS
Page 1 of 12 Sections Included in this Document and Change History 1. Purpose 2. Scope 3. Responsibilities 4. Background 5. References 6. Procedure/(6. B changed Division of Field Science and DFS to Office
FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY OFFICE OF CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER CITY OF NEW YORK. VOLATILES ANALYSIS by GCMS HEADSPACE ANALYSIS
FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY LABORATORY OFFICE OF CHIEF MEDICAL EXAMINER CITY OF NEW YORK VOLATILES ANALYSIS by GCMS HEADSPACE ANALYSIS PRINCIPLE This method confirms the identity of volatile compounds in biological
A Comparison between EPA Compendium Method TO- 15 and EPA Method 8260B for VOC Determination in Soil Gas
A Comparison between EPA Compendium Method TO- 15 and EPA Method 8260B for VOC Determination in Soil Gas Paper #46 Heidi C. Hayes Air Toxics, Ltd., 180 Blue Ravine Rd. Ste. B, Folsom, CA 95630 Diane J.
SUCRALOSE. White to off-white, practically odourless crystalline powder
SUCRALOSE Prepared at the 41st JECFA (1993), published in FNP 52 Add 2 (1993). Metals and arsenic specifications revised at the 63rd JECFA (2004). An ADI of 0-15 mg/kg bw was established at the 37th JECFA
AMD Analysis & Technology AG
AMD Analysis & Technology AG Application Note 120419 Author: Karl-Heinz Maurer APCI-MS Trace Analysis of volatile organic compounds in ambient air A) Introduction Trace analysis of volatile organic compounds
DATA VALIDATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM ROUTINE ANALYTICAL SERVICES
DATA VALIDATION STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM ROUTINE ANALYTICAL SERVICES UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV SCIENCE AND ECOSYSTEM SUPPORT DIVISION
Analytical Data Package Reports
Analytical Data Package Reports TriMatrix offers a variety of analytical data packages formatted to meet the reporting needs and varying data quality objectives of its clients. The data packages offered
Samples RMN070714. Analytical Report (0714-63) GC/FID Analysis (RM01) Nicotine Purity
For the benefit of VaporFi, Inc. Samples RMN070714 Analytical Report (0714-63) GC/FID Analysis (RM01) Nicotine Purity GC/MS Analysis (QG02) Anabasine, Anatabine, Myosmine, Nornicotine Enthalpy Analytical,
Emission Testing February 2015 LMS Energy Pty Ltd - Jilliby Plant
Page: 1 of 6 1/132 Ross Court Cleveland QLD 4163 Emission Testing February 2015 - Jilliby Plant Dear Nathan McClelland, Tests were performed 11 February 2015 to determine emissions to air from Unit 1 at
METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (VPH)
METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF VOLATILE PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (VPH) Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Environmental Analysis (Senator William X. Wall Experiment Station)
Ecology Quality Assurance Glossary
Ecology Quality Assurance Glossary Edited by William Kammin, Ecology Quality Assurance Officer Accreditation - A certification process for laboratories, designed to evaluate and document a lab s ability
CONFIRMATION OF ZOLPIDEM BY LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS SPECTROMETRY
CONFIRMATION OF ZOLPIDEM BY LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS SPECTROMETRY 9.1 POLICY This test method may be used to confirm the presence of zolpidem (ZOL), with diazepam-d 5 (DZP-d 5 ) internal standard, in
Technical Guidance Manual for the Implementation of the Hawai`i State Contingency Plan. Interim Final SECTION 10
Technical Guidance Manual for the Implementation of the Hawai`i State Contingency Plan SECTION 10 DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) Hawai`i HEER TGM 10-1 December 31, 2008 CONTENTS Acronyms
Pesticide Analysis by Mass Spectrometry
Pesticide Analysis by Mass Spectrometry Purpose: The purpose of this assignment is to introduce concepts of mass spectrometry (MS) as they pertain to the qualitative and quantitative analysis of organochlorine
With proper calibration, the upper limit may be extended as needed.
While we have taken steps to ensure the accuracy of this Internet version of the document, it is not the official version. Please refer to the official version in the FR publication, which appears on the
The Characterization of Perfume Fragrances Using GC/MS, Headspace Trap and Olfactory Port
APPLICATION NOTE Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry Authors: Andrew Tipler Sheila Eletto PerkinElmer, Inc. Shelton, CT The Characterization of Perfume Fragrances Using GC/MS, Headspace Trap and Olfactory
METHOD 8082A. POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
METHOD 8082A POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) BY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY SW-846 is not intended to be an analytical training manual. Therefore, method procedures are written based on the assumption that they
Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry
Step-by-Step Analytical Methods Validation and Protocol in the Quality System Compliance Industry BY GHULAM A. SHABIR Introduction Methods Validation: Establishing documented evidence that provides a high
Enhancing GCMS analysis of trace compounds using a new dynamic baseline compensation algorithm to reduce background interference
Enhancing GCMS analysis of trace compounds using a new dynamic baseline compensation algorithm to reduce background interference Abstract The advantages of mass spectrometry (MS) in combination with gas
QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL POLICY BREG SOIL AND WATER QUALITY LABORATORY UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL POLICY BREG SOIL AND WATER QUALITY LABORATORY UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE Department of Bioresources Engineering Rm 111 Worrilow Hall 531 S. College Ave. Newark, DE 19716-2140
Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short- Term Ambient Air Sampling Project
Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale Short- Term Ambient Air Sampling Project Marcellus Shale Conference November 16, 2011 Nick Lazor Chief, Air Quality Monitoring Division Bureau of Air Quality PA Department
Technical Report. Automatic Identification and Semi-quantitative Analysis of Psychotropic Drugs in Serum Using GC/MS Forensic Toxicological Database
C146-E175A Technical Report Automatic Identification and Semi-quantitative Analysis of Psychotropic Drugs in Serum Using GC/MS Forensic Toxicological Database Hitoshi Tsuchihashi 1 Abstract: A sample consisting
NWTPH-HCID. Hydrocarbon Identification Method for Soil and Water
NWTPH-HCID Hydrocarbon Identification Method for Soil and Water Summary This method is a qualitative and semi-quantitative procedure. It is used for groundwater or surface water, and soil/sediment from
METHOD 550. July 1990. J.W. Hodgeson. W.J. Bashe (Technology Applications Inc.) T.V. Baker (Technology Applications Inc.)
METHOD 550 DETERMINATION OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN DRINKING WATER BY LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION AND HPLC WITH COUPLED ULTRAVIOLET AND FLUORESCENCE DETECTION July 1990 J.W. Hodgeson W.J. Bashe
How To Test For Contamination In Large Volume Water
Automated Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) of EPA Method 1694 for Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Large Volume Water Samples Keywords Application Note ENV0212 This collaboration study was performed
A Comparison of EPA Methods 8260B and TO-14A/15 for the analysis of VOCs in Soil Gas: Application to Upward Vapor Intrusion Risk Studies
A Comparison of EPA Methods 8260B and TO-14A/15 for the analysis of VOCs in Soil Gas: Application to Upward Vapor Intrusion Risk Studies Paper #41 James E. Picker, Ph.D., H&P Mobile GeoChemistry 148 South
Quality Assurance Manual
Clinical Laboratory of San Bernardino, Inc. Quality Assurance Manual Clinical Laboratory of San Bernardino, Inc. 21881 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA 92313 Telephone (909) 825-7693 Facsimile (909) 825-7696
Expectations for GC-MS Lab
Expectations for GC-MS Lab Since this is the first year for GC-MS to be used in Dr. Lamp s CHEM 322, the lab experiment is somewhat unstructured. As you move through the two weeks, I expect that you will
Micromass LCT User s Guide
Micromass LCT User s Guide 1) Log on to MassLynx with your username & password. 2) After you have logged in, the MassLynx software will automatically run. 3) After MassLynx has come up, open your project
FUEL QUALITY REPORT BIOCNG GAS ANALYSIS NOVEMBER 2012
FUEL QUALITY REPORT BIOCNG GAS ANALYSIS NOVEMBER 2012 Prepared by: Mark J. Torresani, P.E. and Joseph J. Falle IV, P.E. 8413 Excelsior Drive, Suite 160 Madison, WI 53717 Rev. 0, 12/4/12 Project (enter
EPA Method RSK 175 Dissolved Gasses in Water Matrices using the Teledyne Tekmar HT3 Headspace Analyzer. HT3 Application Note.
EPA Method RSK 175 Dissolved Gasses in Water Matrices using the Teledyne Tekmar HT3 Headspace Analyzer HT3 Application Note Introduction The analysis of dissolved gases in ground water is important in
EnAlgae SOP: Biogas analysis
Table of content 1. PURPOSE... 2 2. PRINCIPLE... 2 3. REQUIREMENTS... 3 3.1. EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS... 3 3.2. REAGENTS... 3 3.3. PREPARATION OF MEASUREMENT... 3 4. PROCEDURE... 4 4.1. SAMPLE MEASUREMENT...
METHOD 3510C SEPARATORY FUNNEL LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION
METHOD 3510C SEPARATORY FUNNEL LIQUID-LIQUID EXTRACTION 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 This method describes a procedure for isolating organic compounds from aqueous samples. The method also describes concentration
This study was performed by Patrick Sullivan and staff at TestAmerica Analytical Testing Corp., Westfield, MA, USA
An Automated Method for the Fractionation of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) from Water and Soil Extracts Using the Gilson GX-274 ASPEC System Keywords: Aliphatic Hydrocarbons, Aromatic Hydrocarbons,
VOCs Ambient Air Monitoring Report
VOCs Ambient Air Monitoring Report Pollution Control Department and Department of Environmental Quality Promotion Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment 2 List of abbreviations BKK ERTC GC/MS HAP
1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan
1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan The purpose of this section is to describe the quality assurance/quality control program that will be used during the system specific field testing
MEPS - Micro Extraction by Packed Sorbent Online SPE for GC and LC sample preparation - Extraction to injection in a single process
- Micro Extraction by Packed Sorbent Online SPE for GC and LC sample preparation - Extraction to injection in a single process Save Hours in Sample Preparation Reduce the time to prepare and inject samples
Graphite Furnace AA, Page 1 DETERMINATION OF METALS IN FOOD SAMPLES BY GRAPHITE FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY (VERSION 1.
Graphite Furnace AA, Page 1 DETERMINATION OF METALS IN FOOD SAMPLES BY GRAPHITE FURNACE ATOMIC ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY I. BACKGROUND (VERSION 1.0) Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) is a widely used
Method development for analysis of formaldehyde in foodsimulant. melamine-ware by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS. Internal Technical Report
of melamine-ware by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS Page 1 of 15 Method development for analysis of formaldehyde in foodsimulant extracts of melamine-ware by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS December 2012 Contact Point: Chris Hopley
CCME. Reference Method for the Canada- Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Tier 1 Method
CCME Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Le Conseil canadien des ministres de l environnement Reference Method for the Canada- Wide Standard for Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil - Tier 1 Method
ANALYSIS OF WATER FOR PPB RANGE CHLORINATED ORGANICS USING A TOTAL ORGANIC CHLORINE ANALYZER
DTR-21-01 1 ANALYSIS OF WATER FOR PPB RANGE CHLORINATED ORGANICS USING A TOTAL ORGANIC CHLORINE ANALYZER Theodore B. Lynn, Ph.D., Mary Kate Boggiano, Larry M. Sacramone, David L. Balog, Andrew C. Lynn,
Project 5: Scoville Heat Value of Foods HPLC Analysis of Capsaicinoids
Willamette University Chemistry Department 2013 Project 5: HPLC Analysis of Capsaicinoids LABORATORY REPORT: Formal Writing Exercises PRE-LAB ASSIGNMENT Read the entire laboratory project and section 28C
SCION SQ Series GC-MS
SCION SQ Series GC-MS The Gas Chromatographers Detector SCION SQ TM GC-MS The SCION SQ series GC-MS systems combine innovative engineering with detailed cutomer requirements to produce a truly innovative
Spectrophotometer - Milton Roy Spectronic 21D or equivalent.
3M COMPANY OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY DIVISION DETERMINATION OF FORMALDEHYDE VAPORS IN AIR USING 3M 3721 FORMALDEHYDE MONITORS May, 2002 SCOPE This procedure covers the method of collecting
Analyzing Small Molecules by EI and GC-MS. July 2014
Analyzing Small Molecules by EI and GC-MS July 2014 Samples Appropriate for GC-MS Volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds Rule of thumb,
DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND DATA USABILITY EVALUATION TECHNICAL GUIDANCE
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Site Remediation Program DATA QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND DATA USABILITY EVALUATION TECHNICAL GUIDANCE Version 1.0 April 2014 Preamble The results of analyses
Analysis of Phthalate Esters in Children's Toys Using GC-MS
C146-E152 Analysis of Phthalate Esters in Children's Toys Using GC-MS GC/MS Technical Report No.4 Yuki Sakamoto, Katsuhiro Nakagawa, Haruhiko Miyagawa Abstract As of February 29, the US Consumer Product
Evaluating Laboratory Data. Tom Frick Environmental Assessment Section Bureau of Laboratories
Evaluating Laboratory Data Tom Frick Environmental Assessment Section Bureau of Laboratories Overview of Presentation Lab operations review QA requirements MDLs/ PQLs Why do we sample? Protect physical,
Pace Analytical e-report
Date Issued: July 28, 2014 Pace Analytical e-report Report prepared for: ATLANTIC TESTING LABORATORIES, LTD 22 CORPORATE DR CLIFTON PARK, NY 12065 CONTACT: Derek Converse ----------------------------------------------
Extraction of Cannabinoids in Marijuana and Edibles by QuEChERS
Extraction of Cannabinoids in Marijuana and Edibles by QuEChERS UCT Part Numbers: ECQUEU750CT-MP - QuEChERS, Mylar packs containing 4 g magnesium sulfate, 1 g sodium chloride, 0.5 g sodium citrate dibasic
Background Information
1 Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy (GC/MS/MS) Background Information Instructions for the Operation of the Varian CP-3800 Gas Chromatograph/ Varian Saturn 2200 GC/MS/MS See the Cary Eclipse Software
Aliphatic/Aromatic Separation of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids or Water by Silica gel Fractionation
ANALYTICAL METHOD 7 FOR CONTAMINATED SITES Aliphatic/Aromatic Separation of Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Solids or Water by Silica gel Fractionation Prepared pursuant to Section 64 of the Contaminated
Application of TargetView software within the food industry - the identi cation of pyrazine compounds in potato crisps
Application Note: ANTV10 Application of TargetView software within the food industry - the identi cation of pyrazine compounds in potato crisps Abstract In order to regulate product safety and quality
Gas Chromatography. Let s begin with an example problem: SPME head space analysis of pesticides in tea and follow-up analysis by high speed GC.
Gas Chromatography Let s begin with an example problem: SPME head space analysis of pesticides in tea and follow-up analysis by high speed GC. Samples in 10mL sealed glass vials were placed in the MPS-2
MIDLAND AREA SOIL SAMPLING MIDLAND, MICHIGAN
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN MIDLAND AREA SOIL SAMPLING MIDLAND, MICHIGAN Revised May 2013 URS Corporation 9400 Amberglen Boulevard Austin, Texas 78729 (512) 454-4797 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Objectives
Determination of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Volatile Solids (TVS) in Waters of Fresh/Estuarine/Coastal Waters
Determination of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Volatile Solids (TVS) in Waters of Fresh/Estuarine/Coastal Waters 1. SCOPE and APPLICATION 1.1 Gravimetric analysis is used to determine total suspended
THERMAL DESORPTION. Introduction and Principles. Focusing on Volatiles
THERMAL DESORPTION Introduction and Principles Thermal Desorption Thermal desorption is a simple extension of the technique of gas chromatography (GC) It involves the use of heat and a flow of inert gas
Waters Corporation. Waters 2690/5 USER & TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDE
Waters Corporation Waters 2690/5 USER & TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDE Contents 2690/5 Theory Setup procedures. Troubleshooting the 2690/5 User maintenance of the 2690/5 Spare Parts 2 2690/5 Theory 2690/5 Solvent
SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF NALTREXONE AND 6- -NALTREXOL IN SERUM BY HPLC
SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF NALTREXONE AND 6- -NALTREXOL IN SERUM BY HPLC Katja SÄRKKÄ, Kari ARINIEMI, Pirjo LILLSUNDE Laboratory of Substance Abuse, National Public Health Institute Manerheimintie,
PLOT Columns. Top: Bob Langford, GC Column Manufacturing Technician Bottom: Stephanie Sunner, Customer Service Representative
PLOT Columns Top: Bob Langford, GC Column Manufacturing Technician Bottom: Stephanie Sunner, Customer Service Representative PLOT Column Selection 93 Features & Benefits of Restek PLOT Columns Features
GC METHODS FOR QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF BENZENE IN GASOLINE
ACTA CHROMATOGRAPHICA, NO. 13, 2003 GC METHODS FOR QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF BENZENE IN GASOLINE A. Pavlova and R. Ivanova Refining and Petrochemistry Institute, Analytical Department, Lukoil-Neftochim-Bourgas
Guidance for Industry
Guidance for Industry Q2B Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology November 1996 ICH Guidance for Industry Q2B Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methodology Additional copies are available from:
American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
Page 1 of 12 The examples provided are intended to demonstrate ways to implement the A2LA policies for the estimation of measurement uncertainty for methods that use counting for determining the number
Setting up a Quantitative Analysis MS ChemStation
Setting up a Quantitative Analysis MS ChemStation Getting Ready 1. Use the tutorial section "Quant Reports" on the MSD Reference Collection CD-ROM that came with your ChemStation software. 2. Know what
Waikato River and Treated Drinking Water Comprehensive Analysis Report 2013/14
Hamilton City Council Private Bag 3010 Hamilton 3240 New Zealand +64 07 838 6699 Waikato River and Drinking Water Comprehensive Analysis Report 2013/14 Hamilton City Council undertakes the following water
Analysis of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Milk Using SPME and GC-MS/MS. No. GCMS-1603. No. SSI-GCMS-1603. Shilpi Chopra, Ph.D.
Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer No. GCMS-1603 Analysis of Organophosphorus Pesticides in Milk Using SPME and GC-MS/MS Shilpi Chopra, Ph.D. Introduction Organophosphorus (OP) pesticides are a class
Fractional Distillation and Gas Chromatography
Fractional Distillation and Gas Chromatography Background Distillation The previous lab used distillation to separate a mixture of hexane and toluene based on a difference in boiling points. Hexane boils
CHAPTER ONE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1
CHAPTER ONE TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 2.0 QA PROJECT PLAN... 1 2.1 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES... 2 2.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES... 2 2.3 SAMPLE COLLECTION... 3 2.4 ANALYSIS AND TESTING...
Halogen Free: What, Why and How. Presented by : Jim Cronin Environmental Monitoring and Technologies, Inc.
Halogen Free: What, Why and How Presented by : Jim Cronin Environmental Monitoring and Technologies, Inc. We will discuss What are Halogens and how we interact with them. Why Halogens, within consumer
Third Party Data Validation: What you need to know and do!
Third Party Data Validation: What you need to know and do! Anand Mudambi & Pamela Wehrmann 2012 DoD EMDQ Workshop San Diego, CA Course Objectives/Outline The course will provide an overview of third party
Technical Procedure for the Solid Phase Extraction of Acidic, Neutral and Basic Drugs for GC-MS Analysis
Technical Procedure for the Solid Phase Extraction of Acidic, Neutral and Basic Drugs for GC-MS Analysis 1.0 Purpose - This procedure specifies the required elements for the solid phase extraction of acidic,
