Exam Performance in a Hybrid Course: A Model for Assessing Online and In Class Exam Delivery Modes
|
|
|
- Giles Hudson
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Exam Performance in a Hybrid Course: A Model for Assessing Online and In Class Exam Delivery Modes Susan M.Siegmann[1],Danyelle Moore[2],Christopher P.Aquino[3] ABSTRACT This study involved the impact of different assessment techniques in a higher education hybrid classroom. The study assessed the differences in exam results when student exams were proctored in-class versus online. In a freshmen level international business course twenty-four students participated in the study. The study was conducted with three conditions; students were administered four fifty-question multiple-choice exams with periodic retesting (N=24), a post-exam survey was distributed after exam one which provided feedback regarding student perceptions (N=24), and student feedback regarding the preference of the modes of delivery of exams was noted by the professor throughout the course (N=24). The proctored in-class retest scores for the students after taking the exam online indicated that they retained the material better than when the exam was first administered in a proctored in-class format. In general, exam scores were higher when the exam was administered online verses proctored in-class. The implications of these findings and the model developed by the authors to capture them are discussed herein. Keywords:0 hybrid classroom, blended teaching, exam delivery method, onlineexamintegrity,studentperceptions,highereducation,business [1]Associate Professor of Business, Niagara County Community CollegeInstructional Support Specialist Niagara University [2]Instructional Support Specialist, Niagara University [3]Assistant Professor of Accounting, Niagara University INTRODUCTION0 ExamPerformanceinaHybridCourse:OnlineversusProctoredInGClassExams Asassessmentofstudentperformancehasevolved,sohastheresearchassociatedwithit.Arelevantand timelyquestionlinkedtotheissueofassessmentiswhetherthemodeofdeliveryofanexamimpactsstudent performance.inotherwords,ifanexamisadministeredonlineratherthanproctoredingclass,willstudent performancebeaffected? ThisstudyinvolvesacomparativeanalysisofonlineandproctoredinGclassassessmentsinahighereducation hybridinternationalbusinessfreshmenlevelcourse.forthepurposesofthisstudy,a hybridcourse is consideredacoursethatemploysbothproctoredingclassandonlinedeliverymethods(babsonsurvey ResearchGroup,Pearson,SloanGC,2012).Thewayinwhichaprofessorchoosestoincorporatetechnologyina hybridcoursemayvary,buttheywillalmostalwaysusealearningmanagementsystemsandotherwebgbased toolstoattempttoaddvaluetothelearningexperience.johnson(nmc"horizon"report,"2013)states, technologyisgoingtocontinuetobeapartoftheclassroom whichshouldencourageprofessorstofind morewaystoincorporateit.theincreasinguseoftechnologyintheclassroommeansprofessorsmust determinehowitcanbeusedeffectivelyforthedeliveryofcoursecontent.inaddition,technologyallows studentstoexploreandlearninwaystheywouldnototherwisebeableto.forexample,goingonafieldtrip toanartmuseuminaforeigncountrymaynotbeanoption,buta virtual fieldtriptothemuseumbywayof theinternetmaybefeasible. 70
2 Oneofthepossiblechangescausedbytheincreaseduseoftechnologyineducationisthemodeofdeliveryof assessmentactivities.changingfromproctoredingclasstoonlineexamsmayallowforincreasedprofessorg studentinteractionduringhybridclasstimebecausetheexamcannowbeadministeredoutsideofregular classtime.thisaddsmoretimeforstudentgstudentandstudentgprofessorinteraction(orcommunity building.)respondingtothediverseneedsanddemandsofstudents(e.g.,distancelearning,reducedtravel timeandcost,necessityformoreflexibilityinschedules,etc.),manyhighereducationprogramshaveadded moreonlineandhybridcourses.(garrison&kamuka,2004).thisprovidesgreateropportunityforcreatinga collaborativeatmospherefilledwithengageddiscussionintheclassroom. Inthisstudy,theprimarypurposeforassessmentactivitiesistomeasuretheamountofmaterialastudenthas retainedandcanrecall.theprofessoradministeredbothonlineandproctoredingclassassessmentsto determinewhetherthemodeofdeliveryforexamsplayedapartinlearningretentionandrecall.thisstudy tookplaceatatwogyearstateschoolofhighereducationandinvolvedatotaloftwentygfourstudentsintwo freshmenlevelinternationalbusinessclassesusingthesameteachingmethods(samecourse). Literature0Review0 ThetransitioninthedeliveryofcoursesfromtraditionalproctoredinGclasstoonlineandhybridinhigher educationisdrivingtheneedforincreasedresearchofteachingandassessmenttechniques.today,threein tencollegestudentsreporttakingatleastoneonlinecourse,thatisupfromoneintenin2003(stengel,2012). Thecollegesoftodayneedtobepreparedtomanagetheincreaseindemandforonlinecontent. Existing literaturesuggeststheneedtosearchforpedagogicalapproachestoonlineeducationthatimprovethequality ofstudentlearning,stimulatefacultyintellectualgrowth,andenhanceoverallacademicproductivity (Bishop, 2003).Effectiveassessmentisacriticalcomponentofqualitylearningandacademicproductivity. Onewaycollegesareaddressingtheincreaseddemandforonlinecontentdeliveryisbyofferinghybrid courses.ahybridorblendedcourseisacoursewherea substantialproportionofthecontent(30g79%)is deliveredonline,typicallyusesonlinediscussions,andtypicallyhasareducednumberofproctoredingclass meetings (Allen&Seaman,2011).TheofferingofhybridcoursesreducestheamountofproctoredinGclass classtimeandchallengesstudentstoworkwiththematerialoutsideofthetraditionalclassroom.thehybrid formatallowstheadministrationofexamstobemovedtoanonlineformat(fromproctoredingclass)ifthe professorchooses.inaddition,withappropriatecontrolsinplace,itmaintainsthesummativeassessment environmentasafinaldisplayofstudentlearning(morgan&o Reilly,1999).Thedecisiontoadministerexams online(versesproctoredingclass)inahybridclassallowstheopportunityforgreaterstudentgprofessor interactionduringtheproctoredingclasstime.however,studentsmaynotbeasfamiliarwithstudyhabitsfor preparationofanonlinetestastheyareforatraditionalingclasstest(hawk,2007). Thehybridenvironmentchallengesstudentstotakegreaterownershipoftheirlearningbecausetheyoften mustloginandworkwiththematerialontheirownschedule.inthisenvironment,studentsmaybegiven controloverthetimingandenvironmentoftheirexambydesigningtheclasstoincludeonlineassessments. Thiscandecreasestressandaidstudentsinmoreefficientlycompletingtheirexamtasks.Itmayallow studentstooptimizetheirsleepgwakecycle resultinginbetterexamperformance (Hartley&Nichols,2008). Inaddition,theprofessorGstudentinteractioncanincreaseintheclassroombecausestudentsshouldbebetter preparedaftercompletingthedeepthinkingactivitiesduringtheonlineportionofthehybridcourse (Kahneman,2011).Itbecomescriticaltoemploytheappropriatetoolforthetaskwhenaskingstudentsto workontheirowntolearnthematerial(graham,2005)(kenney,2012). Kirtman(2009)foundthat changedoesnot necessarilymeanareductioninlearning. Learningisimportant tothestudentwhentheyareinvestedinitandfeelthattheyhavethetimetodoit(prince&felder,2006). 71
3 Whenaprofessoradministersanexamonline,his/herstudentscantakeitwhenitismostconvenientforthem todoso(withinthewindowoftheexamtime). Differentpeoplefunctionmoreefficientlyatdifferenttimesof day,andthiscanaffecttheirperformanceonanytask. (Smithetal.,2002).Intermsofteachingandlearning, thismeansthatsomeprofessors,andsomestudents,willfunctionbetteratdifferenttimesofday.italso meanssomestudentswillbemoresuccessfulonexamsatdifferenttimesofday(hartley,2008). HollisterandBerenson(2009)foundtherewerenodifferencesincourseorexamperformancewhen comparingaproctoredversesunproctoredonlineexamenvironmentusingactivitygbasedexams.however,it shouldbenotedthehollisterandberensonstudydidnotusemultiplegchoiceexams,aswasdoneinthisstudy. Thoughtestenvironmenthasreceivedsignificantattentionfromresearchers,noinstancesofpreviouswork werefoundwherethemodeofexamdelivery(onlinevs.proctoredingclass),test/retest,andhybridclassroom criteriawerecombined.thesetopicsarethefocusofthisstudy. Method0 0 ThepopulationunderstudyconsistedofundergraduatestudentsenrolledintwofifteenGweekhybridfreshmen levelinternationalbusinesscoursesatatwogyearcollege.theresearchteamconsistedofaclassroom professorteachingthetwointernationalbusinesscoursesinwhichthestudywasconductedandtwo collaboratingmembersfromanearbyfourgyearmastersgrantinginstitution.thefirstwasafacultydeveloper withknowledgeandinterestintheareaofonlinetesting.thesecondwasanaccountingprofessorwhowas interestedinlearningmoreabouttheintegrityofonlineassessment. Theclassroomprofessortaughttwosections,backtoback,ofthesameinternationalbusinesscourse.The earliersectionwillbereferredtothroughoutthisstudyasclassaandthelaterasclassb.theprofessor administeredfourexamsthroughoutthesemester.eachexamconsistedoffiftymultiplegchoicequestions; wasofequalvalueintermsofvolume,complexityandcontributiontotheoverallgradeoftheclass;andnone werecomprehensiveinnature.theexamswereadministeredintwodifferentmodes,onlineandproctoreding class,andatdifferenttimesthroughoutthesemester. Theexamdates(excludingretests)wereprovidedtostudentsonthesyllabusatthebeginningofthesemester withanexplanationthatanyoftheexamscouldbeadministeredonlineorproctoredingclass.astheyentered classroomonthedayoftheexam,studentswerenotifiedwhethertheywouldbetakingtheexamproctored ingclass(atthattime)oronline(theyhaduntilmidnightthatnighttocompletetheexamonlineinthelearning ManagementSystem).Assuch,allstudentsshouldhavebeenpreparedfortheproctoredinGclassexamwhen theyarrivedtoclassonthepregannouncedexamday.thisdesignwasemployedasatattempttoovercome thereducedperformanceofonlineexamsassociatedwithoverconfidenceandassociatedlimitedpreparation. Inotherwords,ifstudentsknowanexamwillbeonlinetheremaybeatendencynottoprepareaswellforthe exambecausetheyknowtheywillhaveaccesstooutsideresourceswhiletakingtheexam.bynotknowing whichformatwouldbeemployedandwhattimeofdayitwouldbeadministered(eitheringclassatthetimeof theclassofafterclassuntilmidnightonthedayoftheexam),thestudentspreparedasifitwasaningclass exam.thispreparationislikelytohavebeenmorerigorousthaniftheyknewtheexamwasgoingtobeonline. Inpart,thisstudyisaresponsetothecallformoreresearchbytheHollisterandBerenson(2009)study,the differencebeingmultiplegchoicequestionswereemployedhereinwhilehollisterandberensen(2009)used activitygbasedassessmenttechniques.xuandjaggars(2013)foundthatifstudentsknewinadvancethekind oftesttheyweregoingtotake,theoutcomewasaffected.therefore,inthisstudystudentswerenotpreg notifiedoftheexamformat.however,itshouldbenotedthatbecausestudentsdidnotknowtheformatof theexamaheadoftimetheywerelikelypreparedtotaketheingclassexam.iftheexamwasthenannounced 72
4 tobeonlinetheyhadextratime(untilmidnightthatday)tostudymore(ifdesired)beforecompletingthe exam. AllonlineexamswereadministeredwithcontrolsprovidedbytheLearningManagementSystemusedforthis course.thesecontrolswereputinplacetomaintainconstructvalidity(shuell,1986).morespecifically, constructvaliditywasmaintainedbyusingthesametestquestionsandanswerchoices,thenscramblingthe orderofbothinthedifferenttestingenvironments.thiswasdonetohelpensureexamswouldbeequally rigorousduringanyfutureretestingofthematerial.however,becausethesameexamquestionsandanswers wereusedforinitialexamsandretests,therewastheriskthat questionmemorization (Squire,1992)and/or priming mightaffecttheoutcomesofthestudy.primingreferstothephenomenonthatonceanobjecthas beenperceivedorprocessed,itcanbemoreeasilyperceivedorprocessedthenexttimeitisencountered (Baddeley,2004). TheLearningManagementSystemwassettolimitthetimeastudentcouldspendonanonlineexamtosixty minutesandtorandomizethequestionsandanswersforeachstudenttakingtheexam.allproctoredingclass examswereadministeredwiththesamecontrolsfortime(sixtyminutes)andthesamequestionsandanswers astheonlineexam,butthequestionswerenotrandomizedforeachstudenttakingtheexam.duringthonline exam,studentsviewedtheentireexamatonceallowingforbacktrackingtoemulatethepaperandpencil testingenvironment.however,duetothescramblingfeatureofthelearningmanagementsystemforonline exams,questionsandanswersforproctoredingclassexamsweredeliveredinadifferentorderthanforonline exams.samavatietal(2012)recommendsreducingthetimeallowedforonlineexamsto65g75%ofthetime allowedforproctoredingclassexamstoaccountforthefactthatstudentshaveaccesstooutsideresources whiletakingonlineexams.thiswasnotdoneinthisstudy.hillierandfluck(2013)notethereisapprehension onthepartofacademicsandmanagementadoptingnewfullyelectronicprocessesforhighstakesexams insteadofthefamiliarpaperbasedprocesses.thisisabarrierthatneedstobeaddressedwithreliabledigital systemsandprocedurestomakeasmoothtransitionfrompentokeyboard.duringthetimeaprofessor choosestoconvertanexamthesupportoftheteachingandlearningcenterandexperiencedcolleaguesare imperativebecauseoftheuncertaintyandlearningcurvewithnewtechnologytheprofessorisexperiencing. Tominimizetheimpactofquestionmemorizationand/orpriming,allretestswereadministeredoneweek aftertheinitialexams.testgretestreliabilityisameasureoftheconsistencyofapsychologicaltestor assessment(shuell,1992).thisisusedtodeterminetheconsistencyofatestacrosstime.retestmethod, whereatestisgiventothesameindividualsafteracertainamountoftimehaspassed,isoneoftheeasiest waystoascertainthereliabilityofmeasurements.normallythecorrelationofmeasurementsacrosstimewill notbeperfectbecauseofthedifferentexperiencesandattitudesthatrespondentshaveencounteredfromthe timeofthefirsttest(key,1997).inthisstudy,thismeansstudents experiencesthroughouttheweekmay haveaffectedtheirperformanceontheretest. Thehybridcourseunderstudywasdesignedso60%ofthefinalgradewasequaltotheaverageofthefour exams(15%each).thestudentscouldnotdoharmtotheirgradeduringretesting,buttherewasanincentive totrytoperformwellonaretestbecausethehigherofthetwoscores(theinitialtakeortheretest)was averagedintotheirfinalgrade.theremaining40%ofthecoursegradeconsistedofaseriesofcasestudy activitiesthatwassupplementaltotheseassessmentactivities. TheexamdeliverymodeforClassAwasonlinethenaproctoredinGclassretestforexamone,online(noretest) forexamtwo,proctoredingclassthenaproctoredingclassretestforexamthree,andonline(noretest)for examfour.examdeliverymodeforclassbwasproctoredingclassthenaproctoredingclassretestforexam one,online(noretest)forexamtwo,proctoredingclassthenaproctoredingclassretestforexamthree,and online(noretest)forexamfour(seetable1:examresults). 73
5 FollowingtheexamoneproctoredinGclassretest,allstudentswereaskedtocompleteashortsurveyrelating tothedifferentexamdeliverymodes.thesurveyconsistedofeightdemographicandopengendedquestions. Studentscompletedthesurveyinclasswhiletheywerewaitingtoreceivetheirretestscoreonexamonefrom theprofessor.thepurposeofthesurveywastocollectfeedbackonthemodeofdeliveryandexpectedresults fromthestudentsintheclass. Findings0 Belowisatableoutliningtheaverageexamscoresachievedbystudentsinthetwointernationalbusiness classesunderstudy.thedeliverymodeoftheexamislistedwhereol=onlineandic=proctoredingclass.ifan examwasretested,therearetwoexamscoresintheboxandthedeliverymodeofbothexamsisalsoreported inthesamebox.forexample,classaexamonewasoriginallyadministeredasanonlineexam,butwas retestedunannouncedingclassaweeklater.essentially,therewereatotaloffourunannouncedretests Table1:ExamResults ClassA (n=12) ClassB (n=12) Examone OL81.38%/IC63.8% IC74%/IC59.5% Examtwo OL80% OL71.6% Examthree IC58.4%/IC58% IC55.4%/IC61% Examfour OL78.4% OL73.6% AsindicatedinTable1,examonewasinitiallyadministeredinClassAonline(81.38%)andproctoredinGclassas aretest(63.8%)exactlyoneweeklater.thestudentsearnedaclassaverageof17.58%pointsmoreonthe initialonlineexamthantheydidontheproctoredingclassretest.thesameexamwasadministeredtoclassb proctoredingclassbothtimes(74%/59.5%)andtheclassaveragewas14.5%pointsmoreontheinitial proctoredingclassexamthanontheproctoredingclassretest.examtwowasadministeredinclassa(80%)and ClassB(71.6%)onlineonly(noretest).ExamthreewasadministeredinClassA(58.4%/58%)andClassB (55.4%/61%)proctoredinGclassforboththeinitialandretestexams.ExamfourwasadministeredtoClassA (78.4%)andClassB(73.6%)onlineonly(noretest).Bothclassesearnedhigheraveragescoresonallonline examswhencomparedtotherespectiveproctoredingclassequivalentexams.theexamscoresareconsistent withotherassignmentsinthecoursewhereclassaconsistentlyoutperformedclassb. AlowerscoreontheproctoredinGclassretestforClassAonexamone(initialonline/retestproctoredinGclass) mayhaveoccurredbecausestudentshadaccesstoadditionalresourceswhentakingtheexamonline.alower scoreontheproctoredingclassretestforclassbonexamone(initialproctoredingclass/retestproctoreding class)mightbeexplainedbythefactthatretentiondissolvesquicklywhenstudentsmoveawayfromthe testingdate(johnson&mayer,2009).classaoutperformedclassbonboththeinitialexam(onlineforclassa andproctoredingclassforclassb)andtheproctoredingclassretest(proctoredingclassforbothclassaand ClassB.)ThismayindicatethattheonlinedeliveryoftheexaminsomewayhelpedtheClassAstudentsbetter learnandrecallthematerial
6 Survey0Results0 The Online Journal of Distance Education and e-learning Volume 2, Issue 4 Afteradministeringtheretestonexamone,studentsweregivenashortsurveytocomplete.Amajorityof studentswhocompletedthesurvey(n=24)sharedpositiveremarksaboutonlinetesting(seeappendixafor thesurvey).therewasverylittlevariationbetweentheresponsesinclassawhencomparedtoclassb.for example,whenaskedtofinishthefollowingsentence, Thedifferencebetweenthegradesismostlikely because,studentsrespondedwithanswersdemonstratingtheirawarenessofthepossibilityofgreater learningtakingplaceduringonlinetestingasfollows: Acomfortableenvironmenthelpsstudentswithtestanxietydobetterontestsandretain moreinformation. Investigationofthematerialwhiletakingthetestincreasesthelearningofthematerial. Studentsliketheindependenceofonlinetesttaking. ParallelsrealGlifeexperienceinthefieldoftraining Lessstressful Prefertheabilitytoresearchthematerialthattheyarenotfamiliarwith LearnmoreinGdepthastheyreadthematerialtheydidnotknowonthetest Studentswerealsoaskedonthesurveyiftheyfeltthegradesearnedonlinewereatrueindicatorofstudent understandingofthematerial.theyansweredasfollows: Youneedtounderstandthematerialtoworkonlineefficiently. Itisuptothestudenttotakeresponsibilitytostudywithoutbeinginclass. Youmustreviewmorebecausethereislessteacherinteraction. Iwouldn thavegottenan84onthesecondtest/retestifihadn tdoneanystudyingfortheprevious test.irememberedmostofthematerial. Youareonyourownmostofthetimeanditisuptoyoutolearnit. Twopositiveaspectsofonlinetestingwererevealedthroughthestudentsurvey.First,onlinetestingisoften lessstressfulforstudentsand,second,theabilitytoresearchthequestionswithinspecifiedtimeconstraints mimicstherealworldbusinessenvironment.theseresultswereconsistentwiththosereportedinastudyby Greenberg,etal.(2008). Discussion00 Inthisstudy,theaveragegradesforonlineexamswerehigherineverycase.Thedifferenceinexamscores betweenonlineandproctoredingclassexamscouldbeexplainedbydifferentpreparationtechniquesthat studentsuseforonlineversusproctoredingclassexams(hawk,2007).hawkfoundthatstudentsaremore familiarwithproctoredingclassexamsandknowhowtostudyandprepareforthem.however,inanother 75
7 studyaccesstooutsideresourcescompensatedfortheunfamiliarformatofonlineexams(miller,rainer& Corley,2003). Anotherpossibleexplanationforbettertestresultsintheonlineenvironmentcouldbetimeofday(Hartley& Nichols,2008).Studentswererequiredtotakeonlineexamsafterclassonexamdaybutbeforemidnight. Theywereinformedofwhichitwouldbeonlywhentheyenteredtheclassroomonthedayoftheexam.Ifthe examwastobeonline,theycouldchoosethetimethatbestfittheirscheduleandmoderatedtheirstressors. Ifthiswasafactorinthedifferenceinperformanceinthisstudy,itimpliesthatconvenienceshouldbebuilt intothestructureofahybridclass.withflexibilityoftimetheresearchersdidlookatsubmissiontimesfor onlineexamsandfoundsubmissiontimeswerenotclosetooneanotherleadingtotheconclusionthat studentsintheclassesdidnotworktogetherwhileactuallycompletingtheexam. Inthisstudytheinclassretestgradeswereessentiallythesameregardlessofwhetherstudentstooktheinitial examinclassoronline.thisistrueforexamoneandexamthree.theseresultsareconsistentwiththose foundinthe2008studybygreenberg,etal.wheretheystated: Ourquantitativeanalysisresultedinnosignificantdifferencesbetweenthemeanscoresofthecontentitems onthecomprehensivefinalthatwereinitiallyassessedwithaproctoredingclassexamandthoseinitially assessedwithanonlineexam.thiswasanimportantfindingbecauseitsuggestedthattraditionally administeredexamsdidnotnecessarilyresultinbetterperformanceonatraditionallyadministered comprehensivefinalgandthesamedegreeofusefulnessintermsofperformanceonfinalexamsforonline exams. NumerousstudieshaveproposedthatstudentperformanceononlineandproctoredinGclassassessmentsis statisticallythesame(hollister&barenson,2009),(larson&chungghsien,2009),(stowell&bennett,2010), (Mentzer,etal.,2007).LarsonandSung(2009)employedcontrolsforproctoringintheonlinesectionofthe course.thestudyrequiredstudentstofindaproctoratauniversityorcollege,library,ormilitaryinstallation andtheproctorwasrequiredtocheckphotoidentification.hollisterandberenson(2009)foundtherewereno differencesincourseorexamperformancewhencomparingaproctoredversesunproctoredonlineexam environmentusingactivitygbasedexams.however,asmentionedearlier,thehollisterandberensonstudydid notusemultiplegchoiceexams,aswasthecaseinthisstudy. Commentsfromthesurveyadministeredinthisstudyindicatedthatacomfortableenvironmenthelpsstudents performbetteronexamsandhelpsthemtobetterretaintheinformationbeingtestedon.thismaybe becausethestudentsoftodayareoftenmorecomfortablewithtechnologythantheyarewithpenciland paper. ResearchontestingviacomputergoesbackseveraldecadesandsuggeststhatformultipleGchoice tests,administrationviacomputeryieldsaboutthesameresultsasviapaperandpencil. (Bunderson,1989). However,morerecentresearchshowsthatforyoungpeoplewhohavegonetoschoolwithcomputers, nationalandstatetestsadministeredviapaperandpencilcanyieldsevereunderestimatesofstudents'skillsas comparedwiththesametestsadministeredviacomputer. (Russell,1999).Testanxietyduringanonline assessmentisshowntobelowerthanthatfeltbystudentswhentakingpencilandpaperassessments(stowell &Bennett,2010). Perhapsthemostsignificantcontributionofthisstudyisthedesignoftheretest.Inthestudy, studentsenteredtheclassroomonexamdaywithoutknowingwhethertheywouldbetakingtheexam proctoredingclassatthattimeoronlinelaterintheday.thismeanttheyneededtoprepareasifitwasgoing tobeaproctoredingclassexam.ifitturnedintoanonlineexam(laterthatday)theyhadthebenefitofboth proctoredingclassexampreparationandtheuseofoutsideresourceswhiletakingtheonlineexam.thismay bethebeststructureforahybridclassassessment.inotherwords,ifahybridclassisdesignedsostudentsare unawareofwhethertheexamwillbeproctoredingclassoronline,theywillhavetoprepareforaproctoreding classexam.iftheexambecomesanonlineexam(laterthatday,)performancewilllikelybegreaterthanifit 76
8 waseitheranexpectedonlineorexpectedproctoredingclassexambecausestudentswillhavethebenefitof themorerigorousexampreparation(expectedproctoredingclassexam)andtheuseofoutsideresources (onlineassessmentresourcessuchastextbook,notes,internet,etc.) Limitations0and0Recommendations0for0Future0Research0 Thisstudywaslimitedbythesmallsamplesize(n=24)andbecauseitwasconductedatasingleinstitutionand inasinglecourse.arecommendationforfutureresearcheffortsinthisareawouldbetoadministertoalarger groupacrossinstitutionsanddepartmentsorreplicatethestudyinmultiplecourses.thelimitationofasmall samplesizemayalsohaveaffectedthesurveyresultsifthestudentsfeltidentifiable.assuch,futureresearch inthisareausingstudentperceptionsurveyswouldbenefitfromtheuseofonlineanonymoussurveying. Thepossibilityofstudentsstudyingforthesecondretestisalsoalimitationandmayhaveaffectedtheexam twoproctoredingclassretestscore.inotherwords,theelementofsurprisemayhavebeenlessenedafterthe retestprocesshadbeenusedearlierinthecourse.tocontrolforthisfactor,examsshouldbeproctoredonline andretestedmultipletimesifpossible.thisshouldbeemployedinbothclassesasclassbdidnothavethe onlineexamfollowedbyaningclassretestforthisstudy. Itisalsoimportantforfutureresearchersinthisareatomaintainconstructvalidityiftheydecidetochange examquestionsandanswerstofurthereliminatethepotentialforquestionmemory.retestingoneveryexam, thoughpossible,isnotrecommendedbecausestudentswouldexpecttheopportunitytoimprovetheirgrade andwouldlikelypreparefortheretest.however,thiswouldoccuronlyifstudentswerenotpleasedwiththeir initialexamscore.thismayskewtheretestresults.itispossiblethiswasanissueontheretestofexamthree inthisstudy. Achangeinexamformatmayalsoimprovethevalidityoftheresults.Forexample,ratherthanutilizingall multiplegchoicequestions,futurestudiesmaychoosetoadministershortgansweroressayquestionsforinitial orretests.futurestudiesmayalsoconsidertheuseofasecuredonlinetestingenvironmentsuchaslockdown Browserorliveproctoringtominimizetheuseofoutsidematerials. Conclusion0 A2011studybyAllenconcludedthelevelofstudentsatisfactionisapproximatelythesameforbothonlineand facegtogfacecourses.studentsparticipatinginthisstudyreportedthattheyweresatisfiedwiththeonline testingenvironmentandthatitdecreasedtestanxiety.overalltheprofessorandstudentsinthisstudyhad positiveexperienceswithonlinetesting.thissupportsthehypothesisthatmodeofdeliveryofexamsdoes affectoverallperformance.basedonthequalitativeandquantitativedatacollectedinthisstudy,thestudents earnedahigheraveragegradeandperformedbetterwhentheywereassessedusingonlineexams.thiswas supportedbyallonlineexamscoreswhencomparedtotheirproctoredingclassequivalents. Onlineexamsallowforgreaterflexibilityinscheduling.Inaddition,studentsenjoyusingmoderntechnology andreceivingimmediatefeedbackoftheirtestperformance.thesefactorsmeanonlineexamsareoftenless stressfulforstudentshowever,studentsarealsomorecomfortablepreparingfortraditionalingclassproctored exams(hawk,2007).thisislikelybecausethemajoritytheexamstheyfaceearlyinlifeareadministeredin thisformat.assuch,werecommenddesigninghybridcourseswithrandomtestingmodes,alternating betweenonlineandproctoredingclassformats.thiswillallowstudentstoprepareforexamsinamannerthat ismostcomfortableandfamiliartothem(ingclass)andto take atleastsomeportionsoftheirexamsina mannerthatislessstressfultothem(online.)thisprovidesa bestofbothworlds assessmentapproachtoa hybridclass.inaddition,therandomizationofmodeofdeliverymayincreaseperformanceonallexams. TheprimarypurposeofthisstudywasnottoquantitativelyproveordisprovewhetherinGclassoronline assessmentissuperior,ratheritwastoestablishandapplyaprocess/modelfordoingso.theresearchersfeel 77
9 thiswasaccomplishedandthatthissurpriseretestingmodelhasvalue.however,weacknowledgethatfurther applicationofthemodelonamuchlargerscaleandusingprovenquantitativemethodologywouldbeofgreat benefittoanacademiccommunitythatissteadilyandintentionallymarchingtowardaworldwithmuch greateremphasisonhybridandonlineteachingandlearning.assessmentproceduresinthisnewworldmust bevalidatedand bestpractice modelsneedtobedeveloped.allofthismusttakeplaceveryquicklybecause thepaceofchangetoonlineandhybridclassesisrapid.thisstudycreatedamodeltobeemployedonalarger scaleacrossinstitutionstomoveforwardthisrapidlychangingfield. REFERENCES Allen,E.,&Seaman,J.(2011,November).Babson"Survey"Research"Group:"Going"the"distance:"Online"education" in"the"united"states,"2011[pdf].retrievedfrom Allen,I.E.,&Seaman,J.(2013,January).Babson"Survey"Research"Group:"Changing"course:"Ten"years"of"tracking" online"education"in"the"united"states[pdf].retrievedfrom Baddeley,A.D.(2004).Thepsychologyofmemory.InA.D.Baddeley,M.D.Kopelman,&B.A.Wilson (Authors),The"essential"handbook"of"memory"disorders"for"clinicians(Rev.ed.).Hoboken,NJ:Wiley. Bourne,J.,&Moore,J.C.(Eds.).(2003).SloanQC:"Vol."4."Elements"of"quality"online"education:"Practice"and" direction[pdf].retrievedfromhttp://sloanconsortium.org/publications/books/eqoe4summary.pdf Engelbrecht,J.,&Harding,A.(2004).CombiningonlineandpaperassessmentinawebGbasedcoursein undergraduatemathematics.journal"of"computers"in"mathematics"and"science"teaching,23,217g232. Garrison,D.R.,&Kanuka,H.(2004).Blendedlearning:Uncoveringitstransformativepotentialinhigher education.the"internet"and"higher"education,7(2),95g105.retrievedfromsciencedirectdatabase. Graham,C.R.(2006).Blendedlearningsystems.InC.J.Bonk&C.R.Graham(Authors),The"handbook"of" blended"learning:"global"perspectives,"local"designs.sanfrancisco,ca,usa:pfeiffer. Greenberg,K.,Lester,J.,Evans,K.,Williams,M.,Hacker,C.,&Halic,O.(2008).Studentlearningwith performancegbased,proctoredingclassandlearnergcentered,onlineexams.international"journal"of"teaching" &"Learning"In"Higher"Education,20(3),383G393. Hartley,J.,&Nicholls,L.(2008).Timeofday,examperformanceandnewtechnology.British"Journal"of" Educational"Technology,39(3),555G558. Hawk,T.F.,&Shah,A.J.(2007).Usinglearningstyleinstrumentstoenhancestudentlearning.Decision" Sciences"Journal"of"Innovative"Education,5(1),1G19. Hillier,M.,&Fluck,A.(2013).ArguingagainforeGexamsinhighstakesexaminations.RetrievedFebruary19, 2014,fromTransformingExamswebsite: Hollister,K.K.,&Berenson,M.L.(2009).Proctoredversusunproctoredonlineexams:Studyingtheimpactof examenvironmentonstudentperformance.decision"sciences"journal"of"innovative"education,7(1),271g Johnson,C.I.,&Mayer,R.E.(2009).Atestingeffectwithmultimedialearning.Journal"of"Educational" Psychology,101(3),
10 Kahneman,D.(2011).Thinking,"fast"and"slow.NewYork,NY:Farrar,StrausandGiroux. Kenney,J.L.(2012).Gettingresults:Smallchanges,bigcohortsandtechnology.Higher"Education"Research"&" Development,31(6),873G899. Key,J.P.(1997).ModuleS2Correlation.RetrievedFebruary19,2014,fromResearchDesigninOccupational Educationwebsite: Larson,D.K.,&Sung,C.GH.(2009).Comparingstudentperformance:OnlineversesblendedversesfaceGtoGface. Journal"of"Asynchronous"Learning"Networks,13(1),31G42. Mentzer,G.A.,Cryan,J.,&Teclehaimanot,B.(2007).Twopeasinapod?AcomparisonoffaceGtoGfaceand webgbasedclassrooms.journal"of"technology"&"teacher"education,15(2),233g246.retrievedfromeducation Sourcedatabase. Miller,M.D.,Rainier,R.K.,&Corley,J.K.(2003).PredictorsofengagementandparticipationinanonGline course.retrievedfebruary19,2014,fromonlinejournalofdistancelearningadministrationwebsite: Morgan,C.,&O'Reilly,M.(1999).Assessing"open"and"distance"learners.London:KoganPage. NMC"horizon"report":"2013"higher"education"edition[PDF].(2013).Retrievedfrom Prince,M.J.,&Felder,R.M.(2006).Inductiveteachingandlearningmethods:Definitions,comparisons,and researchbases.journal"of"engineering"education,95(2),123g tb00884.x Russell,M.,&Haney,W.(1997).Testingwritingoncomputers.Education"Policy"Analysis"Archives,5. Samavati,H.,Stumph,C.F.,&Dilts,D.(2012).Interestingtimes:Relationbetweentesttimesandstudent performanceinonlinecourses.journal"of"higher"education"theory"&"practice,12(6),74g80.retrievedfrom EducationSourcedatabase. SchoenfeldGTacher,R.,McConnell,S.,&Graham,M.(2001).DonoharmGAcomparisonoftheeffectsofonGline vs.traditionaldeliverymediaonasciencecourse.journal"of"science"education"&"technology,10(3),257g265. RetrievedfromEducationSourcedatabase. Shuell,T.J.(1986).Cognitiveconceptionsoflearning.Review"of"Educational"Research,56(4),411G Shuell,T.J.(1992).Designinginstructionalcomputingsystemsformeaningfullearning.Adaptive"Learning" Environments,85,19G54. Siemens,G.(2005,August10).Connectivism:LearningasnetworkGcreation.RetrievedFebruary20,2014,from elearnspacewebsite: Smith,C.S.,Folkardb,S.,Schmiedera,R.A.,Parraa,L.F.,Spelten,E.,&Almiral,H.(2002).Investigationof morning eveningorientationinsixcountriesusingthepreferencesscale.personality"and"individual" Differences,32(6),949G968. Squire,L.R.(1992).Declarativeandnondeclarativememory:Multiplebrainsystemssupportinglearningand memory.journal"of"cognitive"neuroscience,4(3),232g
11 Stengel,R.(2012,November29).Reinventingcollege.Time,180(18),31.RetrievedfromAcademicSearch Completedatabase. Stowell,J.R.,&Bennett,D.(2010).Effectsofonlinetestingonstudentexamperformanceandtestanxiety. Journal"of"Educational"Computing"Research,42(2),161G171.RetrievedfromEducationSourcedatabase. Thorndike,E.L.(1913).Educational"psychology.NewYork,NY:Teacherscollege,ColumbiaUniversity. Xu,D.,&Jaggars,S.S.(2013).Theimpactofonlinelearningonstudents courseoutcomes:evidencefroma largecommunityandtechnicalcollegesystem.economics"of"education"review,37,46g57. Appendix(A: Post-Exam Survey 1) My ACTUAL online exam grade was (please circle) , 89-80, 79-70, 69-60, 59-50, 49-40, 39-30, 29-20, or 9-0 2) I EXPECT to earn a (please circle) higher or lower in-class exam grade. 3) The difference between the grades is most likely because PLEASE STOP HERE UNTIL YOU HAVE RECEIVED YOUR GRADED IN CLASS EXAM 4) My ACTUAL in-class exam grade is 5) This difference between the expected and actual in-class exam grade is most likely because 6) This exam grade difference between the online and actual in-class is most likely because 7) Do you expect the grade differences you have seen for yourself to be similar or different when compared to those of your classmates? Circle: Similar Different Please give at least three reasons why this may be. 1) 2) 3) 8) Do you feel grades earned in online/hybrid classes are a true indicator of a student understanding of the material? Please explain. (Optional Question) Your emotions as you completed this survey can best be described as: (Optional Question) In general, how do you feel about online/hybrid classes verses traditional classes? THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION IN THIS VERY IMPORTANT SURVEY 80
Texas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy
Texas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy Policy Statement Texas Wesleyan University recognizes the goal of distance education is to increase accessibility to learning by providing
INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1153366 Test: CH 9 Acceleration Test on 29/07/2015 Grade: B Score: 85.37 % (35.00 of 41.00)
INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1153366 Grade: B Score: 85.37 % (35.00 of 41.00) INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1346350 Grade: I Score: 21.95 % (9.00 of 41.00) INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1350672 Grade: A
INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1141027 Test: CH 9 Acceleration Test on 09/06/2015 Grade: A Score: 92.68 % (38.00 of 41.00)
INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1141027 Grade: A Score: 92.68 % (38.00 of 41.00) INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1172998 Grade: B Score: 85.37 % (35.00 of 41.00) INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1232138 Grade: B
Southwest Texas Junior College Distance Education Policy
Southwest Texas Junior College Distance Education Policy I. Institutional Policies A. Mission To provide quality education to students who prefer or require an alternative classroom setting. To accomplish
PIEDMONT TECHNICAL COLLEGE PROCEDURE PROCEDURE NUMBER: 3-1-1012.1. PAGE: 1 of 6. Development and Delivery of Distance Education Courses
PAGE: 1 of 6 TITLE: RELATED POLICY AND S: Development and Delivery of Distance Education Courses 3-1-1012 Development and Delivery of Distance Education 1-3-1000.1 Copyright Compliance 8-2-1031.1 Full-time
Title: Transforming a traditional lecture-based course to online and hybrid models of learning
Title: Transforming a traditional lecture-based course to online and hybrid models of learning Author: Susan Marshall, Lecturer, Psychology Department, Dole Human Development Center, University of Kansas.
Fully Online or Blended Courses does it make a difference for the learner?
Fully Online or Blended Courses does it make a difference for the learner? D. Sarkis, N. Kee, C.J. Perumalla Department of Physiology, University of Toronto Toronto, Canada [email protected], [email protected],
TEACHING PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS: INTERNET VS. TRADITIONAL CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION
21 TEACHING PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS: INTERNET VS. TRADITIONAL CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION Doris S. Bennett, Jacksonville State University Gene L. Padgham, Jacksonville State University Cynthia S. McCarty, Jacksonville
UNION COUNTY COLLEGE
UNION COUNTY COLLEGE COURSE SYLLABUS CHILD PSYCHOLOGY - 3 CREDITS PSY 205-302 PRE-REQUISITE: GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY 101 SUMMER II - 2015 Classes begin promptly on 7, 2015 Final Exam (no exceptions): August
OPTIMIZING COURSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM RESOURCES IN THE INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING COURSE
OPTIMIZING COURSE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM RESOURCES IN THE INTRODUCTORY ACCOUNTING COURSE Michelle Li-Kuehne Assistant Professor, CPA, MS Department of Accounting and Finance College of Saint Benedict/Saint
Best Practices for Increasing Online Teaching Evaluation Response Rates
Best Practices for Increasing Online Teaching Evaluation Response Rates Denise T. Ogden, Penn State University Lehigh Valley James R. Doc Ogden, Kutztown University of Pennsylvania ABSTRACT Different delivery
SECTION I: Multiple Choice. It is Monday afternoon, May 2, and you will be taking the AP Psychology Exam.
AP Psychology Exam Regularly Scheduled Exam Date: Monday afternoon, May 2, 201 Late-Testing Exam Date: Friday morning, May 20, 201 Section I Total Time: 1 hr. 10 min. Section II Total Time: 50 min. Section
The Effect of Electronic Writing Tools on Business Writing Proficiency
The Effect of Electronic Writing Tools on Business Writing Proficiency Lisa Walters and Susan McNamara Lisa M. Walters is Visiting Assistant Professor of Business Administration and Susan McNamara is Assistant
Flipped classroom in first year management accounting unit a case study
Flipped classroom in first year management accounting unit a case study Xinni Du Blended Learning Advisor, School of Business University of Western Sydney Sharon Taylor Senior Lecturer, School of Business
Interactive Online Lessons Using Articulate Storyline
Interactive Online Lessons Using Articulate Storyline Elizabeth Miller The Ohio State University [email protected] Joint work with Jason Miller and Carolyn Johns Hybrid and Online Math Courses at
Best Practices for Online Learning
United University Professions Technology Issues Committee Best Practices for Online Learning It has been some time since the development of the UUP document entitled Intellectual Property, Software and
Online Teaching and Learning
Teaching online requires faculty members to shift their roles from instructor to facilitator or coach. Content shifts to customized materials and learning includes many active components. Simonson, Smaldino,
Success rates of online versus traditional college students
ABSTRACT Success rates of online versus traditional college students Dawn Wilson Fayetteville State University David Allen Fayetteville State University Are students setting themselves up for failure by
PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY
PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONALITY PPE 3003, Section 01D9 Time: Tuesday 5 th & 6 th Periods (11:45am-1:40pm), Thursday 6 th Period (12:50-1:40pm) Location: Normal Hall, Room 137 Fall, 2012 Instructor: Teaching
Model for E-Learning in Higher Education of Agricultural Extension and Education in Iran
Model for E-Learning in Higher Education of Agricultural Extension and Education in Iran Jafar Yaghoubi 1 and Iraj Malekmohammadi 2 1. Assistant Professor, Zanjan University, Iran, [email protected] 2.
Blended Learning vs. Traditional Classroom Settings: Assessing Effectiveness and Student Perceptions in an MBA Accounting Course
Blended Learning vs. Traditional Classroom Settings: Assessing Effectiveness and Student Perceptions in an MBA Accounting Course Clement C. Chen, University of Michigan - Flint Keith T. Jones, Illinois
Retention and Success of Regular vs. Online and Hybrid Courses Fall 2001 through Spring 2003
Retention and Success of Regular vs. Online and Hybrid Courses through In a follow up to a study originally reported in July, data were examined to determine the retention 1 and success 2 rates for regular,
Switching Economics Courses from Online Back to the Classroom: Student Performance and Outcomes
International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 2 No. 22; December 2011 Switching Economics Courses from Online Back to the Classroom: Student Performance and Outcomes Richard Vogel Department
An Analysis of how Proctoring Exams in Online Mathematics Offerings Affects Student Learning and Course Integrity
An Analysis of how Proctoring Exams in Online Mathematics Offerings Affects Student Learning and Course Integrity Introduction Reliable assessment is central to education and educational institutions for
Coni Francis, PhD, RD Nutrition and Dietetics Program University of Northern Colorado
Coni Francis, PhD, RD Nutrition and Dietetics Program University of Northern Colorado University of Northern Colorado Nutrition and Dietetics Program Alena Clark, PhD, MPH, RD Jamie Erskine, PhD, RD Albion
PSEOP Orientation Distance Testing
PSEOP Orientation Distance Testing Distance Testing Introduction Office of Computer Based Assessment & Evaluation (CBAE) Goal: Delivery of reliable, secure online tests to the UA community. Website: http://www.uakron.edu/testing
Suggest the following information be placed on bottom of Policy page, space permitting, or on last page of
Effective Date: Definition Authority Scope The purpose of this document is to ensure the consistent academic quality and accessibility of all online/ hybrid courses and programs offered through Humboldt
Program Overview and Assessment Methodology for Online Instruction in Chemistry at Oregon State University
Program Overview and Assessment Methodology for Online Instruction in Chemistry at Oregon State University Kim Thackray and Michael M. Lerner Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis,
MBA 5401, Management Information Systems Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives.
MBA 5401, Management Information Systems Course Syllabus Course Description Theory and practice of management information systems including information requirements analysis, design methodology, and system
Examples of Teacher-Designed/Scored Feedback Questionnaires A Guided Self-Analysis for Beginning Instructors
Examples of Teacher-Designed/Scored Feedback Questionnaires A Guided Self-Analysis for Beginning Instructors Teaching is a complex process that rests in large part on the quality of the exchanges between
AFC (Accredited Financial Counselor) Program
AFC (Accredited Financial Counselor) Program Registration Guidelines for the University Program Registration as an Approved University Program provides students with the opportunity to obtain the AFC at
Student Feedback on Online Summer Courses
Student Feedback on Online Summer Courses October 8, 2015 Santa Clara University Office of Assessment Report Introduction In the summer of 2015, approximately 700 undergraduate students were enrolled in
Faculty Handbook for Alternative Delivery Classes 2011-2012
Faculty Handbook for Alternative Delivery Classes 2011-2012 Learning Technologies Department Table of Contents Overview for All Alternate Delivery Classes... 1 Delivery Methods... 1 Enhancement and Tools...
A Blended Learning Model for Graduate Business Education
A Blended Learning Model for Graduate Business Education Brian Davis Goddard School of Business & Economics Weber State University Ogden Utah United States of America E-mail: [email protected] Abstract
How To Study Online Accounting
Dr. Sara Schmidt, CPA Northern State University Overview Introduction Purpose of the Study Research Design Findings Conclusions Recommendations for Practice Recommendations for Further Study Final Thoughts
222 2016 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
AP Physics C: Mechanics Exam Regularly Scheduled Exam Date: Monday afternoon, May 9, 2016 Late-Testing Exam Date: Friday afternoon, May 20, 2016 Section I Total Time: 45 min. Section II Total Time: 45
How To Learn Distance Learning
Global Outreach & Extended Education [email protected] ph: 480.965.1740 Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering Distance Learning Student Manual Welcome to the office of Global Outreach and Extended Education
Preparing for the HFMA CRCR Exam... 1
Elsevier Performance Manager Preparing for the HFMA CRCR Exam Table of Contents Preparing for the HFMA CRCR Exam... 1 Purpose of the CRCR Exam... 1 Preparing for the CRCR Exam... 1 CRCR Study Guides...
Testing and Tutoring Center. Located on the second floor of the McCarthy Library
Testing and Tutoring Center Located on the second floor of the McCarthy Library Department Services Testing English and Math Assessment Instructor exams for students with accommodations Make-up instructor
Fall 2015. University of Alaska Anchorage. elearning: Distance Student Services Faculty Information Guide
University of Alaska Anchorage elearning: Distance Student Services Faculty Information Guide Fall 2015 University of Alaska Anchorage elearning: Distance Student Services 3211 Providence Drive Anchorage,
Using Eggen & Kauchak, Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms for the New York State Teacher Certification Examinations
Using Eggen & Kauchak, Educational Psychology: Windows on Classrooms for the New York State Teacher Certification Examinations Introduction The New York State Education Department requires that prospective
Student Motivations for Choosing Online Classes
International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Volume 6 Number 2 Article 11 7-2012 Student Motivations for Choosing Online Classes Heidi S. Harris Eastern Oregon University, [email protected]
Final Exam Performance. 50 OLI Accel Trad Control Trad All. Figure 1. Final exam performance of accelerated OLI-Statistics compared to traditional
IN SEARCH OF THE PERFECT BLEND BETWEEN AN INSTRUCTOR AND AN ONLINE COURSE FOR TEACHING INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS Marsha Lovett, Oded Meyer and Candace Thille Carnegie Mellon University, United States of
IMPACT OF INFORMATION LITERACY AND LEARNER CHARACTERISTICS ON LEARNING BEHAVIOR OF JAPANESE STUDENTS IN ONLINE COURSES
International Journal of Case Method Research & Application (2008) XX, 4 2008 WACRA. All rights reserved ISSN 1554-7752 IMPACT OF INFORMATION LITERACY AND LEARNER CHARACTERISTICS ON LEARNING BEHAVIOR OF
Statistics. 268 2016 The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web: www.collegeboard.org.
Statistics AP Statistics Exam Regularly Scheduled Exam Date: Thursday afternoon, May 12, 2016 Late-Testing Exam Date: Wednesday morning, May 18, 2016 Section I Total Time: 1 hr. 30 min. Section II Total
MARKETING EDUCATION: ONLINE VS TRADITIONAL
MARKETING EDUCATION: ONLINE VS TRADITIONAL Smith, David F. Bemidji State University [email protected] Stephens, Barry K. Bemidji State University [email protected] ABSTRACT Online higher
AP EUROPEAN HISTORY COURSE SYLLABUS 2014-2015. Mr. Sheridan Blue Springs South High School
AP EUROPEAN HISTORY COURSE SYLLABUS 2014-2015 Mr. Sheridan Blue Springs South High School The objective of the AP European History course is to increase the student's understanding of European history
Are College Students Prepared for a Technology-Rich Learning Environment?
Are College Students Prepared for a Technology-Rich Learning Environment? Victoria Ratliff Dean of Business & Information Technology Mountain Empire Community College Big Stone Gap, VA 24219 USA [email protected]
First Certificate in English Online Practice Test Free Sample. How to complete the FCE Online Practice Test Free Sample: Writing
First Certificate in English Online Practice Test Free Sample How to complete the FCE Online Practice Test Free Sample: Writing Welcome to the First Certificate in English Online Practice Test Free Sample.
Credit Hours and Distance Education Courses: Background Information and Process
Credit Hours and Distance Education Courses: Background Information and Process Why is this Necessary? Due to Federal regulations promulgated by the US Department of Education, the Higher Learning Commission
PSY 101: Introduction to Psychology (ONLINE) Mercer County Community College
PSY 101: Introduction to Psychology (ONLINE) Mercer County Community College Professor Heather Jennings Email: [email protected] Phone: 609-586-4800 ext.3450 Office: LA 129 Course Textbook: Visualizing
The International College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal Volume 1, Number 3. Abstract
Comparing Student Performance, Attitudes and Preferences in an Introduction to Business Course: Online, Hybrid and Traditional Delivery Methods Who Makes the A Grade? Daniel Gutierrez, (E-mail: [email protected])
GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY PSY 1103 CRN 34299 (3 credit hours) EDU 102 MTWR 9:30-10:45
University of Central Oklahoma Summer 2012 GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY PSY 1103 CRN 34299 (3 credit hours) EDU 102 MTWR 9:30-10:45 Instructor: J. Grellner, Ph.D., Professor of Psychology Office: Education Building
Florida Gulf Coast University Lutgert College of Business Marketing Department MAR3503 Consumer Behavior Spring 2015
Course name: Class schedule: Course mode: Classroom: Lutgert Hall, Room 2208 CRN: 10141 Consumer Behavior Tuesday & Thursday, 9:30 AM 10:45 AM On campus, face-to-face meetings Credit hours: 3 Final exam:
A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of an Online and Face-to-Face Technology Applications Course in Teacher Education
Kuo, J., Song, H., Smith, R., & Franklin, T. (2007). A comparative study of the effectiveness of an online and face-to-face technology applications course in teacher education. International Journal of
Overview of the Course
BCOM 3113: Written Business Communications Spring 201 Spears School of Business Oklahoma State University Instructor: Kim McCrackin Contact Information: Office: OSU-Tulsa, North Hall 103 Email: [email protected]
Blackboard Learning System: Student Instructional Guide
Blackboard Learning System: Student Instructional Guide This manual was prepared to assist students in the understanding, orientation, and usage of the Blackboard Learning System online course management
A Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes in Traditional and Online Personal Finance Courses
A Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes in Traditional and Online Personal Finance Courses Eddie J. Ary Associate Professor Frank D. Hickingbotham School of Business Ouachita Baptist University Arkadelphia,
Student Perceptions of Credibility and Enhancing the Integrity of Online Business Courses: A Case Study
Student Perceptions of Credibility and Enhancing the Integrity of Online Business Courses: A Case Study Michael P. Watters Louis Dawkins Professor of Accounting Henderson State University (corresponding
Evaluation in Online STEM Courses
Evaluation in Online STEM Courses Lawrence O. Flowers, PhD Assistant Professor of Microbiology James E. Raynor, Jr., PhD Associate Professor of Cellular and Molecular Biology Erin N. White, PhD Assistant
MBA: 2013-2014 Assessment Report. Master of Business Administration (MBA) Assessed by: MBA Faculty. Cycle of Assessment: Fall 2013-Spring 2014
Master of Business Administration (MBA) Assessed by: MBA Faculty Cycle of Assessment: Fall 2013-Spring 2014 Mission Statement: The Malone University Department of Business provides its students with an
Student Guide 2014-2015
Student Guide 2014-2015 Editorial team Assoc. Prof. Athanassios Mihiotis, MBA Programme Director, HOU Dr. Giannis T. Tsoulfas, Tutor, MBA Programme, HOU Contents Introduction... 3 Academic governance...
Features of the Online Course. Table of Contents. Course Interface: Overview... 2. Syllabus... 3. Navigating through the Course Content...
Features of the Online Course Table of Contents Course Interface: Overview... 2 Syllabus... 3 Navigating through the Course Content... 4 Learning Modules... 5 Communicating... 5 Assessments... 6 Assignments...
PSYCHOLOGY 1115 - Section M01 Mixed Mode Spring Semester 201110. Fundamentals of Psychology I MW 11:30 - A130. Course Description
PSYCHOLOGY 1115 - Section M01 Mixed Mode Spring Semester 201110 Fundamentals of Psychology I MW 11:30 - A130 ***You are responsible for all information in this syllabus!*** Instructor: Dr. Jennifer Poole,
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Point and Non-Point Source Management
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Point and Non-Point Source Management DOCUMENT NUMBER: 385-2314-002 TITLE: EFFECTIVE DATE: AUTHORITY: POLICY: PURPOSE: APPLICABILITY: DISCLAIMER: Sewage
K12 ONLINE LEARNING: THE NATIONAL LANDSCAPE AND
K12 ONLINE LEARNING: THE NATIONAL LANDSCAPE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR WASHINGTON Sue Collins November 9, 2011 Agenda National Landscape / Trends National Standards Policy Barriers and Recommendations Blended
e-learning: Teaching Computer Programming Online to First Year Engineering
Paper ID #10103 e-learning: Teaching Computer Programming Online to First Year Engineering Students Dr. Lizzie Santiago, West Virginia University Lizzie Y. Santiago, Ph.D., is Teaching Assistant Professor
2OO7. Distance Learning Course Guide migrant student graduation enhancement program
2OO7 Distance Learning Course Guide migrant student graduation enhancement program K 16 Education Center * Continuing Education The University of Texas at Austin 2OO7 Distance Learning Course Guide migrant
A SUCCESSFUL STAND ALONE BRIDGE COURSE
A SUCCESSFUL STAND ALONE BRIDGE COURSE Joann Segovia* Professor Minnesota State University Moorhead 1104 7th Avenue South Moorhead, MN 56563 Phone: (218) 477-4067 E-Mail: [email protected] James Hansen
COM 411 Online Course Computer Mediated Interpersonal Communication Fall 2015 8 Week Version October 19 December 11, 2015
COM 411 Syllabus- Page 1 of 9 COM 411 Online Course Computer Mediated Interpersonal Communication Fall 2015 8 Week Version October 19 December 11, 2015 Instructor: Dr. Jim Grubbs E-mail address: [email protected]
INDUSTRIAL-ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
INDUSTRIAL-ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY Psychology 375 Pre-session Summer 2011 Location: McClelland, Rm 122 M-F 1-3:50PM Instructor: Beatriz Alvarado, M.A. Office: Psychology, Rm.??? e-mail: [email protected]
Dr. Darin T. Kapanjie 22 Oakmont Circle Phone: 267.974.2204
Dr. Darin T. Kapanjie 22 Oakmont Circle Phone: 267.974.2204 Glen Mills, PA 19342 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION Temple University, Philadelphia, PA Ed.D. Curriculum, Instruction & Technology
Department of Management Information Systems Terry College of Business The University of Georgia. Major Assessment Plan (As of June 1, 2003)
Department of Management Information Systems Terry College of Business The University of Georgia Major Assessment Plan (As of June 1, 2003) Note to Readers: The MIS Faculty takes seriously our challenge
PSY 201 GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY
PSY 201 GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY TERM: Winter 2003, January 6 th to March 14 th TIME & LOCATIONS: TR 8:00-9:20 @ WITH 109 Professor: Bob Uttl, Ph.D. Office: Moreland Hall 204D Office hours: TR 8:30-9:30 or by
Key English Test Online Practice Test Free Sample. How to complete the KET Online Practice Test Free Sample: Reading & Writing
Key English Test Online Practice Test Free Sample How to complete the KET Online Practice Test Free Sample: Reading & Writing Welcome to the Key English Test Online Practice Test Free Sample. This is the
http://www.dmacc.edu COURSE TITLE: Java Application Developer Certificate Program
http://www.dmacc.edu COURSE TITLE: Java Application Developer Certificate Program INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION NAME: Kelli Kleindorfer EMAIL ADDRESS: [email protected] PHONE NUMBER: 515.965.7002 (office
COURSE OUTLINE ELCC 125 INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS 45 HOURS 3 CREDITS APPROVED BY ACADEMIC COUNCIL:
APPLIED ARTS DIVISION School of Health, Education and Human Services Fall, 2015 COURSE OUTLINE ELCC 125 INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS 45 HOURS 3 CREDITS PREPARED BY: Instructor DATE:
The Active Learning Classroom Project
The Active Learning Classroom Project Collaborative for Teaching Innovation Christine Bachen, Nancy Cutler, & Eileen Elrod, Co-Directors Santa Clara University October 30, 2014 The Collaborative for Teaching
CRN: STAT / 2013 3880 CRN 2016 1 / INFO 4300 CRN
Course Title: Data Mining / Predictive Analytics Quarter/Year: Spring Quarter, 2013 Course Number, Section, CRN: STAT 3880 CRN 2016 Sect. 1 / INFO 4300 CRN 4865 Sect. 1 Prerequisites: STAT 1400 Statistics
