A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of an Online and Face-to-Face Technology Applications Course in Teacher Education
|
|
- Ralph Knight
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Kuo, J., Song, H., Smith, R., & Franklin, T. (2007). A comparative study of the effectiveness of an online and face-to-face technology applications course in teacher education. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 3(2), A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of an Online and Face-to-Face Technology Applications Course in Teacher Education Chia-Ling Kuo Kent State University Hongbo Song Yantai University Renee Smith and Teresa Franklin Ohio University An online and face-to-face technology applications course was examined for their effectiveness on technology attitude of college students and their technological application skills. A three-part survey was designed and administered to 62 education undergraduate students. Twenty-four out of 27 valid surveys were returned from the online group, while 34 out of 35 from the face-to-face group. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the online and face-to-face classes in terms of students attitudes toward technology before and after taking a technology applications course although their technological application skills were increased after both modes of course delivery. Keywords: effectiveness, online learning, technology applications course, teacher education BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY The Internet has become an increasingly important tool in education during the past decades. More and more colleges and universities provide online courses for their students via spending a great deal of time and effort in looking inward to analyze the efficacy of Chia-Ling Guo is an assistant professor at Kent State University. Hongbo Song is an associate professor in the School of Foreign Languages, Yantai University, Laishan, Yantai, Shandong, P. R. China. hongbo_song@hotmail.com. Renee Smith is an adjunct teacher at Ohio University. Teresa Franklin is an associate professor of Instructional Technology, College of Education, Ohio University.
2 86 International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning learning through the use of technology in addition to making substantial investments in new technologies for teaching (Phipps & Merisotis, 1999, p. 9). Whether or not the learning outcomes are the same in both online and face-to-face learning environments remains a point of debate (Johnson, Aragon, Shaik, & Palma-Rivas, 2000; Phipps & Merisotis, 1999; Robertson, Grant, & Jackson, 2005; Sellers, Wright, & Wright, 2003; van Schaik, Barker, & Beckstrand, 2003). Furthermore, learners various perceptions of online courses concerning course quality, learning content, learner satisfaction, learning effectiveness, course assessment, interaction level, learning flexibility, course design, technical support, online resources, learner autonomy, and online pedagogy may largely contribute to the complexity of such a debate. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY This study examined pre-service teachers attitudes toward technology and their selfevaluation of technological application skills in a technology applications course in two teaching formats: online and face-to-face. The results of the study may help instructors to better understand whether the instruction of online or face-to-face technology courses is similarly effective in terms of attitude and learning outcomes. The results may provide reference points on how to design dynamic online courses to maximize learning opportunities and achievements in online learning environments, and on how to provide necessary assistance to online students to better achieve teaching/learning outcomes. REVIEW OF LITERATURE Distance learning is geographically separated, flexible in time, and operated through appropriate and corresponding media of technology (e.g., microwave system, compressed video system, two-way video and two-way audio videoconferencing) and non-technology (e.g., organizational management, administrative support, policy). In other words, distance learning is The acquisition of knowledge and skills through mediated information and instruction, encompassing all technologies and other forms of learning at a distance ( 3). Online learning as a subset of distance learning facilitates the learning transaction through the Internet. As a special form of educational process or practice, however, the uncertainties of online learning remain to be solved regarding how, and in what ways, technology can enhance the teaching/learning process, particularly at a distance (Phipps & Merisotis, 1999, p. 29). Further research in online learning is thus required because there is little research to accurately determine the benefits and pitfalls of online instruction, particularly when compared to the more traditional face-to-face learning environment (Johnson et al., 2000, p. 30). Or, to put it differently, do students who study online gain more knowledge, or at least the same amount, as they do in a traditional face-to-face setting? Undeniably, the effectiveness of teaching and learning is an indicator of being able to achieve desired results under certain conditions; consequently, the ultimate indicator of course effectiveness is the extent to which students reach the learning objectives (Johnson et al., 2000). In terms of the effectiveness of online learning, three broad measures are usually examined in the original research: (1) student outcomes such as grades and test scores; (2) student attitudes about learning through online instruction; and (3) overall student satisfaction toward online instruction (Phipps & Merisotis, 1999). In a study that compared a graduate online course (n = 19) with an equivalent course taught in a traditional face-to-face format
3 Teaching Effectiveness 87 (n = 19) by the same instructor and with the same content, activities, and projects, Johnson et al. (2000) found that the students in the face-to-face course held slightly more positive perceptions about the instructor and overall course quality; students had significantly more positive views about interaction and support although there was no difference between the course s format in outcome measures in terms of course projects, grades, and most of the student self-assessment of tasks. In another study that focused on a community and technical college system s online courses, however, Prince and Stern (2002) presented the survey results in a report that compared online students (n 22,000) with on-campus students (n = 291,000) from 1999 to In this report, Prince and Stern found that students satisfaction with their online courses and instructors remained consistently high although their satisfaction level with library resources, technical support, and advising was lower. More recently, in a quasi-experimental mixed research design, van Schaik et al. (2003) reported that there was no observable difference in either test performance or attrition between on-campus and online course delivery methods, although those who studied online (n = 36) appeared to appreciate the flexibility of this approach to study content more than did the on-campus group (n = 83). Similar findings appeared in Caywood and Duckett s (2003) study that revealed no significant differences in the measurement of initial learning or follow-up performance between 76 graduate students from multi-cultural backgrounds who started classes online compared to another 75 graduate students with similar backgrounds who started the same on-campus course in the special education teacher credential program. However, in an Internet-based graduate allied health program for two groups defined based on residential status, Sellers et al. (2003) reported that when the interaction of residential status and employment status was examined, off-campus students who were employed in full-time positions achieved higher Grade Point Averages (GPAs). Further, in a study that compared differences in the academic achievement of postgraduate business students performance (final grade) in nine units offered in both face-to-face (n = 1,085) and electronic learning (n = 316) modes over the course of two years, Ladyshewsky (2004) reported that students, on average, did better in the electronic learning mode although at the individual unit level there were minimal, if any, significant differences. Age and gender did not appear to moderate performance in any way except for those students under thirty-three years old who did better, on average, in the electronic learning mode. Moreover, based on the 92 student survey responses (20 for online courses and 72 for on-campus courses), Robertson et al. (2005) further confirmed that online students perceived their learning experience the same or significantly better than the classroom-based learning for graduate education courses. These studies, via diverse foci, using various media, different levels of participants and settings, focusing on individual courses or whole programs, and utilizing assorted research methods and designs, presented mixed findings in terms of the effectiveness of distance learning as compared to traditional face-to-face learning. Under such circumstances, attitudes from pre-service teachers toward online and face-to-face teaching formats are important because their perceived effectiveness of these two distinct instructional delivery platforms may generate potential impact on the pre-service teachers future use of technology in the classroom. DESIGN OF THE STUDY This study, based on a pretest-posttest non-experimental design, was to examine changes in technology attitudes and technological application skills of students majoring in education. Two types of research questions, descriptive and statistical, were used in this study:
4 88 International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning DESCRIPTIVE QUESTIONS 1. What is the background information of the participants? 2. What are the attitudes toward technology among students in the online course before and after taking the technology course? 3. What are the attitudes toward technology among students in the face-to-face course before and after taking the technology course? 4. What are the technological application skills among students in the online course before and after taking the technology course? 5. What are the technological application skills among students in the face-to-face course before and after taking the technology course? STATISTICAL QUESTIONS 1. Do students attitudes toward technology in the online class differ from those in the face-to-face class before and after taking the technology course? 2. Do students technological application skills in the online class differ from those in the face-to-face class before and after taking the technology course? The instrument utilized for this study was a three-part survey designed by the researchers after careful examination of the literature in the field. The first part of the survey asked for participants demographic information such as gender, major, year in school, a self-evaluation of technology ability, and different ways they use technology. The second part of the survey measured participants attitudes toward technology via implementing a five-point Likert scale of a 15 item survey with 1 as strongly disagree (SD) and 5 as strongly agree (SA). The third part of the survey was a 20 item technological application skill test with 1 as I don t know how to do it, and 5 as I know how to do it very well. These technological application skill items were designed based on the course syllabus, which covers technological application skills in using Microsoft Word, PowerPoint, Excel, Publisher, multimedia software, and Web design software. The purpose of the questions design was to help the researchers understand how much the students learned after having taken a technology applications course. The content and construction of the survey instrument was evaluated by three professors and three doctoral students in the programs of Instructional Technology, Research and Evaluation, and Physics. To further control instrumentation bias, reliability for both scales was tested. Two internal consistency, coefficient alpha and split-half coefficient expressed as a Spearman-Brown corrected correlation, were computed via SPSS for Windows For the split-half coefficient, the scale was split into two halves using odd and even item entry method. The reliability of attitude toward technology scale and the technological application scale in the pre-test and post-test for both face-to-face and online teaching formats were computed accordingly. The reliability for both scales in the pre-test and post-test were found to be consistent. The values for coefficient alpha and split-half coefficient were all above.83 (see Table 1 on the next page). These values were satisfactory because a measure that has a coefficient alpha of at least.6 or.7 and preferably closer to.9 is considered helpful (Aron & Aron, 2002). Sixty-two undergraduate students majoring in education at a large Midwestern university in the United States participated in the pre-test during the spring and summer quarters of Among them, twenty-seven students were enrolled in the online technology applications
5 Teaching Effectiveness 89 class and the other 35 students were enrolled in the equivalent face-to-face class. Of the 27 online students, twenty-four (8 males and 16 females) participated in the post-test with the majority of the students majoring in Early Childhood Education. Of the 35 face-to-face students, thirty-four (5 males and 29 females) participated in the post-test with the majority of students majoring in Middle School and Young Adult Education. Those unreturned post-test surveys in both modes of course delivery could have been the result of voluntary participation. Blackboard Learning Management System 6.0 was used for the online class to deliver course-related materials, instructional interactions, quizzes, feedback, and scores. For the online class, students were taught asynchronously using discussion boards, , assigned readings, and electronic presentations; yet, they were expected to come to the first class meeting, one class meeting in the middle of the quarter, and the last class meeting. The planned combination of online learning with traditional face-to-face teaching or a hybrid/ blended delivery mode was to provide online learners with the opportunity to meet face-toface with the instructor and classmates. The students in the face-to-face class met twice a week in a two-hour session each. The teaching content was the same for both classes and by the same instructor for both modes of course delivery. Table 1. The Reliabilities of Each Scale for Pre-test and Post-test Online and Face-to-Face Groups Pre-Test Post-Test Coefficient Split-Half Coefficient Split-Half Alpha Coefficient Alpha Coefficient Face-to-Face Attitude toward Technology Scale Technological Application Skill Scale Online Attitude toward Technology Scale Technological Application Skill Scale The identical survey was administered to participants in both classes during the first and the last class meetings. Quantitative methods via running SPSS for Windows 12.0 were applied in this study. Descriptive statistics was used to understand the background information for both sets of the participants. An independent t test was used to analyze the differences between pre-test and post-test scores within each type of class (e.g., online and face-to-face) as well as the differences between the pre-test and pre-test and between the post-test and post-test across the two types of classes. The effect size for the t test for independent means was computed to understand the magnitude of difference between the means of both online and face-to-face groups.
6 90 International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning RESULTS Data collected via the administered survey were keyed into SPSS for Windows 12.0 for further analysis. The results of the study were reported as follows: OVERALL RESULTS FOR BACKGROUND INFORMATION OF THE PARTICIPANTS The participants included two groups: online and face-to-face. In the online group, twenty-four valid pre- and post-test data from 8 males and 16 females were collected. Eleven participants were majoring in Early Childhood Education, 6 in Middle Childhood Education, 3 in Young Adult Education, 1 in Physical Education, and 3 in the Integrated Education with special areas that included the grades Seventeen out of the 24 participants were seniors, 6 juniors, and 1 for the sole purpose of getting a teaching license. With respect to the self-evaluation for the technology ability, the results of the pre-test showed that 33% of the participants thought that they were in the categories of non-users and beginners, but the percentage dropped to 17% in the post-test. In the pre-test, 66.7% of the participants evaluated themselves as confident in their technology ability and capable of teaching others, but the percentage increased to 83.3% in the post-test. Regarding technology use, the pre-test and the post-test did not show large differences. Most participants used technology in communication and as a supplementary means to extend classroom learning. Word processing programs, presentation software, , the Internet, CD-ROM, and online resources were most frequently used by the participants. In the face-to-face group, a total of 34 valid data from 5 males and 29 females were collected. Six participants were majoring in Early Childhood Education, 7 in Middle Childhood Education, 4 in Young Adult Education, 9 in the Integrated Education with special areas of concentration that included grades 7-12, 1 in Physical Education, 2 in Special Education, 3 in Art Education, and 2 in Language Education. Six out of 34 participants were sophomores, 11 juniors, and 17 seniors. Regarding the self-evaluation for the technology ability, the results of the pre-test showed that 31.4% of the participants evaluated themselves as beginners in their technology ability, but the percentage dropped to 26.5% in the post-test. In regards to technology ability, 57.1% of the participants in the pre-test indicated the category of confidence, while in the post-test, 50% of the participants thought that their abilities were in the category of confidence. In the category of capable of teaching others, there was only 5.7% of the participants who thought that they were in this category, but in the post-test, the percentage of this category increased to 23.5%. With respect to technology use, there was no difference between the pre-test and post-test. Most participants used technology for communication. Word processing and presentation software were the most frequently used programs. Spreadsheet, Web design, and multimedia application software were less used by these participants. Table 2 on the next page presented a summary of the participants background information. ATTITUDE TOWARD TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATION SKILLS AMONG ONLINE PARTICIPANTS The overall means (M) and standard deviations (SD) of the attitude toward technology (ATT) in the pre-test and post-test in the online class were similar (M ATT-pretest = 53.26, SD = 10.45; M = 57.46, SD ATTpretest ATT-posttest ATT-posttest = 8.99). The value of skewness was normally distributed. The changes were from Skewness ATT-pretest =.29 to Skewness ATT-posttest =.08. However, the means, standard deviations, and the values of skewness were very different
7 Teaching Effectiveness 91 in the technological application skills (TAS) between pre-test and post-test (M TAS-pretest = 33.33, SD = 15.63; M = 68.96, SD = 5.67). The value of skewness TAS-pretest TAS-posttest TAS-posttest changed from Skewness TAS-pretest =.99 to Skewness TAS-posttest = In other words, the means of technological application skills were doubled in the post-test, but the spread of scores was three times smaller than those in the pre-test. Regarding the values of skewness, scores were distributed from low in the pre-test to high in the post-test. Table 2. Background Information Online Group Face-to-Face Group Number 24 (Males: 8, Females: 16) 34 (Males: 5, Females: 29) Major Early Childhood Education 11 6 Middle Childhood Education 6 7 Young Adult 3 4 Physical Education 1 1 Integrated with Special Areas 3 9 Special Education 2 Art Education 3 Language 2 Participating Group Senior Junior 6 11 Sophomore 6 For Teaching License 1 Self-evaluation of Technology Level Non-Users (Pre- to Post-test) 4% to 0% 0% to 0% Beginners (Pre- to Post-test) 33% to 17% 37% to 27% Confident Users (Pre- to Post-test) 52% to 66% 57% to 50% Teaching Others (pre- to Post-test) 11% to 17% 6% to 23% Technology Use Most for and Most for ; as supplementary means Word processing & to extend classroom PPT frequently used; learning (e.g., Word Excel, Web design processing, PPT, and multimedia CD-ROM, online application software resources) less used ATTITUDE TOWARD TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATION SKILLS AMONG FACE-TO-FACE PARTICIPANTS The means (M) and standard deviations (SD) of the attitude toward technology (ATT) in the pre-test and post-test among face-to-face participants did not have a big difference (M ATT-pretest = 53.66, SD ATT-pretest = 10.58; M ATT-posttest = 58.65, SD ATT-posttest = 7.64). The value
8 92 International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning of skewness was also distributed normally. The changes were from Skewness ATT-pretest = -.18 to Skewness ATT-posttest = However, the means, standard deviations, and the values of skewness were very different in the technological application skills (TAS) between pre-test and post-test (M TAS-pretest = 33.03, SD TAS-pretest = 12.28; M TAS-posttest = 65.50, SD TAS-posttest = 8.28). This result was similar to the online case, although the online students showed slightly higher scores in means with a smaller distribution. The value of skewness changed from Skewness TAS-pretest =.11 to Skewness TAS-posttest = -.65, which indicated that most scores in the technological application skills were high in the post-test. COMPARISON OF ONLINE CLASS WITH FACE-TO-FACE CLASS IN THE COMPUTER ATTITUDE BEFORE AND AFTER TAKING A TECHNOLOGY COURSE An independent t test was conducted to evaluate the difference of computer attitude between the participants in the online class and in the face-to-face class before and after taking a technology course. The results of the t test showed that there was no significant difference in the computer attitude between the two different teaching formats before and after taking the technology course, t before (60) =.15, p =.88 (M face-to-face = 53.66, SD face-toface = 10.58; M online = 53.26, SD online = 10.45); t after (56) =.54, p =.59 (M face-to-face = 58.65, SD face-to-face = 7.64; M online = 57.46, SD online = 8.99). The effect size was COMPARISON OF ONLINE CLASS WITH FACE-TO-FACE CLASS IN THE TECHNOLOGICAL APPLICATION SKILLS BEFORE AND AFTER TAKING A TECHNOLOGY COURSE The technological application skills between the online class and the face-to-face class were also evaluated by an independent t test. The results of the t test showed that there was no significant difference in the technological application skills between the two different teaching formats both before and after taking the technology course, t before (60) = -.09, p =.93 (M face-to-face = 33.03, SD face-to-face = 12.28; M online = 33.33, SD online = 15.63); t after (56) = -1.77, p =.08 (M face-to-face = 65.50, SD face-to-face = 8.28; M online = 68.96, SD online = 5.67). The effect size was.49. A summary of these results was tabulated in Table 3. Table 3. Results Summary Pre-Test Post-Test M SD Skewness t p M SD Skewness t p Computer Attitude Online Face-to-Face Technology Skills Online Face-to-Face Note. M represents mean and SD standard deviation.
9 Teaching Effectiveness 93 CONCLUDING REMARKS This study showed that the attitudes of the students toward technology use in the face-toface and in the online classes were almost identical both before and after the course. Although no significant changes in terms of students attitudes toward technology use were found, their overall attitudes toward technology use in either type of class showed a very small increase after the course had been taken as compared to before the course. As far as students technological application skill levels were concerned, this study showed that their technological application skill levels for both online and face-to-face classes increased by about a factor of 2 on the post-test as compared to the pre-test. Although the pre-test scores for technological application skill level were similar for both online and face-to-face groups, the post-test scores were slightly higher for the online class as compared to the face-to-face class. To understand the mean difference across these two different groups, the effect size of a finding is its magnitude, generally regarded as an indication of its practical importance [italicized in the original] (Tuckman, 1999, p. 285). The effect size was.49 in the post-test and this indicated that a medium size of effectiveness in the technological application skills was found in the online class. The online teaching method results shown in this study were slightly more effective in increasing the technological skill levels. The results of this study may be elucidated from at least three perspectives. The first perspective concerns the students themselves. With the rapid development of technology as well as its diffusion into all walks of life, today s students have already fostered positive attitudes toward technology use. Therefore, neither method of teaching had much effect on increasing their attitudes toward technology use, but both methods had significant effect on increasing the technological skill levels. Given the same course materials to students in both classes, students in the traditional face-to-face setting may tend to rely more on teacher s assistance. However, students in the online class read the tutorials and related assignment instructions to complete their assignment problems. Such practices may have increased their confidence in technological application skills, and thus, be a reason why the online class showed slightly more effectiveness in terms of enhancing their technological skill levels. The second perspective is that online pedagogy must be fully considered and well designed to suit the requirements of the content and needs of learners (e.g., course planning, monitoring process, managing mechanism, evaluating criteria, learning resources, and learning activities). As such, Salmon s (2003) e-moderating model (i.e., access and motivation, socialization, information exchange, knowledge construction, and development) may serve as a planning tool for online instructors although the assessment and evaluation processes are not discussed in Salmon s e-moderating model. The third perspective relates to learning theory. From a social learning perspective, channels must be open for learner contact with instructors and peers and the provision of timely and critical feedback from both instructors and peers. Even in online learning, face-to-face meetings with instructors and learners are imperative to facilitate both social and academic interactions between student-instructor, student-student, student-content, and student-outside resources. Face-to-face meetings may be arranged to follow the at-the-beginning-middleending-course model. However, such a hybrid/blended learning modal may go beyond a ratio of delivery modalities; it may be perceived more as a pedagogical approach that combines the effectiveness and socialization opportunities of the classroom with the technologically enhanced active learning possibilities of the online setting in addition to its potentialities to cater to individual needs. At this point, socialization is indispensable in any educational mode. A natural occurrence of online socializing may be achieved through the affordances of technology, design, activity, and/or intervention. For example, content-focused learning
10 94 International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning can be achieved through browsing Web pages, tutorials, external links to online resources, or discussion boards, while social contact can be achieved through , listserv, or chat. These processes, although time-consuming, are necessary steps toward ensuring successful online learning. REFERENCES Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (2002). Statistics for the behavioral and social sciences: A brief course (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Caywood, K., & Ducket, J. (2003). Online vs. on-campus learning in teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 26(2), Definition of Distance Learning (n.d.). Retrieved August 18, 2007, from Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(1), Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2004). E-learning compared with face to face: Differences in the academic achievement of postgraduate business students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(3), Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved December 6, 2004, from ihep.com/pubs/pdf/difference.pdf Prince, D., & Stern, P. (2002). Online learning students: Characteristics, satisfaction, and implications for future planning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED481385) Robertson, J. S., Grant, M. M., & Jackson, L. (2005). Is online instruction perceived as effective as campus instruction by graduate students in education? The Internet and Higher Education, 8, Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge Falmer. Sellers, R. G., Wright, K. E., & Wright, V. H. (2003). Attitudes and perceptions of on- and off-campus students of an internet-based graduate allied health program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478777) Tuckman, B. W. (1999). Conducting educational research (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. van Schaik, P., Barker, P., & Beckstrand, S. (2003). A comparison of on-campus and online course delivery methods in Southern Nevada, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 5-15.
Examining Students Performance and Attitudes Towards the Use of Information Technology in a Virtual and Conventional Setting
The Journal of Interactive Online Learning Volume 2, Number 3, Winter 2004 www.ncolr.org ISSN: 1541-4914 Examining Students Performance and Attitudes Towards the Use of Information Technology in a Virtual
More informationReproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 448 722 IR 020 485 AUTHOR Johnson, Scott D.; Aragon, Steven R.; Shaik, Najmuddin; Palma-Rivas, Nilda TITLE Comparative Analysis of Online vs. Face-to-Face Instruction. PUB DATE 1999-10-00
More informationVIEWS OF STUDENTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND SPORT MANAGEMENT ON DISTANCE EDUCATION
VIEWS OF STUDENTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND SPORT MANAGEMENT ON DISTANCE EDUCATION Asst.Prof.Dr.Gülten Hergüner Sakarya University Physical Education and Sports Teaching Department herguner@sakarya.edu.tr
More informationEffectiveness of Online Instruction
Effectiveness of Online Instruction Delar K. Singh, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Education Eastern Connecticut State University Willimantic, CT 06226 E-mail: singhd@easternct.edu Paper presented
More informationTeaching a Blended Supply Chain Management Course to Marketing Majors
Atlantic Marketing Journal Volume 3 Issue 2 Innovations in Teaching Article 6 2014 Teaching a Blended Supply Chain Management Course to Marketing Majors Ahren Johnston Missouri State University, ahrenjohnston@missouristate.edu
More informationPedagogical Characteristics of Online and Face-to-Face Classes
International Jl. on E-Learning (2008) 7(3), 523-532 Pedagogical Characteristics of Online and Face-to-Face Classes KARL L. WUENSCH, SHAHNAZ AZIZ, EROL OZAN, MASAO KISHORE, AND M. H. N. TABRIZI East Carolina
More informationAssessing Blackboard: Improving Online Instructional Delivery
Assessing Blackboard: Improving Online Instructional Delivery Adnan A. Chawdhry chawdhry_a@cup.edu California University of PA Karen Paullet kp1803@online.apus.edu American Public University System Daniel
More informationModel for E-Learning in Higher Education of Agricultural Extension and Education in Iran
Model for E-Learning in Higher Education of Agricultural Extension and Education in Iran Jafar Yaghoubi 1 and Iraj Malekmohammadi 2 1. Assistant Professor, Zanjan University, Iran, Jafar230@yahoo.com 2.
More informationAchievement and Satisfaction in a Computer-assisted Versus a Traditional Lecturing of an Introductory Statistics Course
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(3): 1875-1878, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 2009, INSInet Publication Achievement and Satisfaction in a Computer-assisted Versus a Traditional Lecturing of an
More informationA Study of Student Attitudes and Performance in an Online Introductory Business Statistics Class
A Study of Student Attitudes and Performance in an Online Introductory Business Statistics Class Sue B. Schou Idaho State University ABSTRACT Due to economic constraints, more and more distance education
More informationTeaching Phonetics with Online Resources
Teaching Phonetics with Online Resources Tien-Hsin Hsing National Pingtung University of Science of Technology, Taiwan thhsin@mail.npust.eud.tw Received October 2014; Revised December 2014 ABSTRACT. This
More informationWhere has the Time Gone? Faculty Activities and Time Commitments in the Online Classroom
Where has the Time Gone? Faculty Activities and Time Commitments in the Online Classroom B. Jean Mandernach, Swinton Hudson, & Shanna Wise, Grand Canyon University USA Abstract While research has examined
More informationOnline Versus In-Class Courses: An Examination of Differences in Learning Outcomes
Issues Lisa Kirtman in Teacher Education, Fall 2009 103 Online Versus In-Class Courses: An Examination of Differences in Learning Outcomes Lisa Kirtman California State University, Fullerton There has
More informationImpact of Online Instruction on Teachers Learning And Attitudes toward Technology Integration
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE October 2005 ISSN 1302-6488 Volume: 6 Number: 4 Article: 7 ABSTRACT Impact of Online Instruction on Teachers Learning And Attitudes toward Technology
More informationTexas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy
Texas Wesleyan University Policy Title: Distance Education Policy Policy Statement Texas Wesleyan University recognizes the goal of distance education is to increase accessibility to learning by providing
More informationEvaluation in Online STEM Courses
Evaluation in Online STEM Courses Lawrence O. Flowers, PhD Assistant Professor of Microbiology James E. Raynor, Jr., PhD Associate Professor of Cellular and Molecular Biology Erin N. White, PhD Assistant
More informationPREDICTING STUDENT SATISFACTION IN DISTANCE EDUCATION AND LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE April 2007 ISSN 1302 6488, Volume: 8 Number: 2 Article: 9 PREDICTING STUDENT SATISFACTION IN DISTANCE EDUCATION AND LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS ABSTRACT Ismail
More informationSouthwest Texas Junior College Distance Education Policy
Southwest Texas Junior College Distance Education Policy I. Institutional Policies A. Mission To provide quality education to students who prefer or require an alternative classroom setting. To accomplish
More informationLearning Management System Self-Efficacy of online and hybrid learners: Using LMSES Scale
Learning Management System Self-Efficacy of online and hybrid learners: Using LMSES Scale Florence Martin University of North Carolina, Willimgton Jeremy I. Tutty Boise State University martinf@uncw.edu
More informationHow Nontraditional Bachelor of Science Degree Technology Students Perceive Distance Learning
How Nontraditional Bachelor of Science Degree Technology Students Perceive Distance Learning Dale E. Thompson, Betsy Orr and Cecelia Thompson This is a report of a questionnaire survey of 27 students.
More informationEngineering Cultures: Online versus In-class
Engineering Cultures: Online versus In-class Rosamond Parkhurst Iver C. Ranum High School RParkhurst@adams50.org Juan Lucena Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO USA jlucena@mines.edu Barbara M. Moskal
More informationTitle of the submission: A Modest Experiment Comparing Graduate Social Work Classes, on-campus and at A Distance
Title of the submission: A Modest Experiment Comparing Graduate Social Work Classes, on-campus and at A Distance Topic area of the submission: Distance Education Presentation format: Paper Names of the
More informationResearch Proposal: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Learning as. Opposed to Traditional Classroom Delivered Instruction. Mark R.
1 Running head: Effectiveness of Online Learning Research Proposal: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Online Learning as Opposed to Traditional Classroom Delivered Instruction Mark R. Domenic University
More informationEFL LEARNERS PERCEPTIONS OF USING LMS
EFL LEARNERS PERCEPTIONS OF USING LMS Assist. Prof. Napaporn Srichanyachon Language Institute, Bangkok University gaynapaporn@hotmail.com ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to present the views, attitudes,
More informationTHE BARRIERS AND NEEDS OF ONLINE LEARNERS
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE July 2014 ISSN 1302-6488 Volume: 15 Number: 3 Article 5 THE BARRIERS AND NEEDS OF ONLINE LEARNERS ABSTRACT Asst. Prof. Napaporn SRICHANYACHON Language
More informationEducation at the Crossroads: Online Teaching and Students' Perspectives on Distance Learning
Education at the Crossroads: Online Teaching and Students' Perspectives on Distance Learning Jacqueline Leonard and Smita Guha Temple University Abstract The Internet offers colleges and universities new
More informationStudent Feedback on Online Summer Courses
Student Feedback on Online Summer Courses October 8, 2015 Santa Clara University Office of Assessment Report Introduction In the summer of 2015, approximately 700 undergraduate students were enrolled in
More informationStudents Attitudes about Online Master s Degree Programs versus Traditional Programs
Aberasturi, S., & Kongrith, K. (2006). Students attitudes about online master s degree programs versus traditional programs. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 50-57. Students
More informationAlternative Online Pedagogical Models With Identical Contents: A Comparison of Two University-Level Course
The Journal of Interactive Online Learning Volume 2, Number 1, Summer 2003 www.ncolr.org ISSN: 1541-4914 Alternative Online Pedagogical Models With Identical Contents: A Comparison of Two University-Level
More informationA Comparison of Asynchronous Online Text-Based Lectures and Synchronous Interactive Web Conferencing Lectures
Issues Ashley in Ann Teacher SkylarEducation, Fall 2009 69 A Comparison of Asynchronous Online Text-Based Lectures and Synchronous Interactive Web Conferencing Lectures Ashley Ann Skylar California State
More informationRunning Head: COMPARISON OF ONLINE STUDENTS TO TRADITIONAL 1. The Comparison of Online Students Education to the
Running Head: COMPARISON OF ONLINE STUDENTS TO TRADITIONAL 1 The Comparison of Online Students Education to the Traditional Students of Classroom Education Brent Alan Neumeier The University of Arkansas
More informationRunning Head: COHORTS, LEARNING STYLES, ONLINE COURSES. Cohorts, Learning Styles, Online Courses: Are they important when designing
Running Head: COHORTS, LEARNING STYLES, ONLINE COURSES Cohorts, Learning Styles, Online Courses: Are they important when designing Leadership Programs? Diana Garland, Associate Director Academic Outreach
More informationA Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes in Traditional and Online Personal Finance Courses
A Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes in Traditional and Online Personal Finance Courses Eddie J. Ary Associate Professor Frank D. Hickingbotham School of Business Ouachita Baptist University Arkadelphia,
More informationPrevalence of Fully Online Courses in Dietetics Education Programs
Prevalence of Fully Online Courses in Dietetics Education Programs Denise M. Brown, PhD, RD, LD Associate Professor Department of Nutrition and Food Systems The University of Southern Mississippi Susan
More informationFace to face or Cyberspace: Analysis of Course Delivery in a Graduate Educational Research Course
Face to face or Cyberspace: Analysis of Course Delivery in a Graduate Educational Research Course Robert S. Legutko DeSales University Center Valley, PA USA RSL2@desales.edu Abstract Student attitudes
More informationA PRELIMINARY COMPARISON OF STUDENT LEARNING IN THE ONLINE VS THE TRADITIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
A PRELIMINARY COMPARISON OF STUDENT LEARNING IN THE ONLINE VS THE TRADITIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL ENVIRONMENT Dr. Lori Willoughby Dr. Linda Cresap Minot State University Minot ND willough@minotstateu.edu cresap@minotstateu.edu
More informationDistance Learning Survey of Texas Tech University s. Distance and Off-Campus Students. Five Year Comparison 2005-2009. Administrative Report
Distance Learning Survey of Texas Tech University s Distance and Off-Campus Students Five Year Comparison 2005-2009 Administrative Report September 2011 Office of Planning and Assessment Introduction The
More informationOutcomes of Preservice Teacher s Technology Use
Outcomes of Preservice Teacher s Technology Use William F. Morrison, Assistant Professor, Bowling Green State University Tara L. Jeffs, Assistant Professor, East Carolina University Abstract: At a time
More informationUsing the Four-Questions Technique to Enhance Critical Thinking in Online Discussions
Using the Four-Questions Technique to Enhance Critical Thinking in Online Discussions Martha E. Alexander Doctoral Student, Department of Educational Psychology and Special Education malexander10@student.gsu.edu
More informationIdentifying Stakeholder Needs within Online Education. Abstract
Bozkurt Identifying Stakeholder Needs 1 Identifying Stakeholder Needs within Online Education Dr. Ipek Bozkurt Assistant Professor Engineering Management Programs School of Science and Computer Engineering
More informationStudent Preferences for Live, Recorded, and Text-Based Lectures in a Stress Management Course. Kristine Fish, PhD. Associate Professor
Student Preferences for Live, Recorded, and Text-Based Lectures in a Stress Management Course Kristine Fish, PhD Associate Professor California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 West Temple Ave
More informationAt-Risk Factors for the Community College Web-Based Student. Herbert. E. Muse, Jr., Ph.D. Associate Director, Distance Learning Montgomery College
1 20th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning click here -> At-Risk Factors for the Community College Web-Based Student Herbert. E. Muse, Jr., Ph.D. Associate Director, Distance Learning Montgomery
More informationInternational Conference on Communication, Media, Technology and Design. ICCMTD 09-11 May 2012 Istanbul - Turkey
OVERCOMING COMMUNICATION BARRIERS IN ONLINE TEACHING: UNDERSTANDING FACULTY PREFERENCES Ertunga C. Ozelkan and Agnes Galambosi Systems Engineering & Engineering Management University of North Carolina
More informationTraining for faculty who teach online
Training for faculty who teach online David Batts Leslie Pagliari William Mallett Cheryl McFadden Dr. Batts is an Assistant Professor in the College of Technology and Computer Science at East Carolina
More informationEmese Ivan. Teaching Sports Economics through Technology
Emese Ivan St John s University, Queens NY, USA Teaching Sports Economics through Technology Abstract: Although still in infancy, the use of the internet as a means of teaching college courses including
More informationImpact of ICT on Teacher Engagement in Select Higher Educational Institutions in India
Impact of ICT on Teacher Engagement in Select Higher Educational Institutions in India Bushra S P Singh 1, Dr. Sanjay Kaushik 2 1 Research Scholar, University Business School, Arts Block 3, Panjab University,
More informationCan Using Individual Online Interactive Activities Enhance Exam Results?
Can Using Individual Online Interactive Activities Enhance Exam Results? Dr. Lydia MacKenzie Professional Adjunct Professor College of Continuing Education University of Minnesota St. Paul, Minnesota 55108
More informationFAU Faculty Survey for Distance Learning Online Courses, Summer Office Hours 2014 Results Summary and Recommendations
FAU Faculty Survey for Distance Learning Online Courses, Summer Office Hours 2014 Results Summary and Recommendations Background Over the past several years, FAU has invested substantial financial and
More informationGRADUATE FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING
GRADUATE FACULTY PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE TEACHING Sharon Santilli and Vesna Beck Nova Southeastern University The participants for this study were 47 doctoral faculty from Nova Southeastern University Fischler
More informationHow To Teach Nurse Leadership
Susan Pettorini-D Amico, DNP, RN September 27, 2014 STTI Leadership Connection Disclosure Information: No conflict of interest to disclose for this presentation No sponsorship or commercial support was
More informationOnsite Peer Tutoring in Mathematics Content Courses for Pre-Service Teachers
IUMPST: The Journal. Vol 2 (Pedagogy), February 2011. [www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu] Onsite Peer Tutoring in Mathematics Content Courses for Pre-Service Teachers Elaine Young Associate Professor of Mathematics
More informationTechnology Use in an Online MBA Program
1 21st Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning click here -> Technology Use in an Online MBA Program Mengyu Zhai, M.S. Associate Instructor Counseling and Educational Psychology Department
More informationA Hybrid-Online Course in Introductory Physics
A Hybrid-Online Course in Introductory Physics Homeyra R. Sadaghiani California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA hrsadaghiani@csupomona.edu INTRODUCTION The recent demand and interest in developing
More informationOvercoming Doubts About Online Learning
Educational Technology Cooperative Overcoming Doubts About Online Learning November 2009 Southern Regional Education Board 592 10th St. N.W. Atlanta, GA 30318 (404) 875-9211 www.sreb.org This publication
More informationQUALITY ASSURANCE OF ONLINE LEARNING
QUALITY ASSURANCE OF ONLINE LEARNING December 1, 2014 As Prepared by Dr. Chris Schedler, Director of Multimodal Learning Dr. Tom Henderson, Director of Institutional Assessment Daniel Matthews, Director
More informationThe University of Hawai i Community Colleges Online Learning Strategic Plan
The University of Hawai i Community Colleges Online Learning Strategic Plan GOAL 1,2,3,4,5 DESCRIPTION OUTCOMES RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND DATA REPORTING FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS Overview As an important subset
More informationIMPLEMENTATION OF ONLINE FORUMS IN GRADUATE EDUCATION
IMPLEMENTATION OF ONLINE FORUMS IN GRADUATE EDUCATION Walkyria Goode ESPAE-Graduate School of Management Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral Abstract 1 This paper argues that online forums in graduate
More informationAn exploratory study of student motivations for taking online courses and learning outcomes
An exploratory study of student motivations for taking online courses and learning outcomes ABSTRACT Sarath A. Nonis Arkansas State University Grant H. Fenner Arkansas State University An investigation
More informationOnline Course Delivery - A Santa Barbara City College Perspective
Online Course Delivery: A Santa Barbara City College Perspective Andreea M. Serban, Ed.D. Director of Institutional Assessment, Research and Planning Santa Barbara City College Pablo Buckelew Dean, Academic
More informationPerceptions of Online Course Communications and Collaboration
Perceptions of Online Course Communications and Collaboration Lucy Barnard Texas Tech University lm.barnard@ttu.edu Valerie Osland Paton Texas Tech University valerie.paton@ttu.edu Kristyn Rose Mesa State
More informationJustification For Certification Program for Teaching Online. Daniel Aguilar Jose Banda Maria Eugenia Perez
Running head: JUSTIFICATION FOR CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Justification For Certification Program for Teaching Online Daniel Aguilar Jose Banda Maria Eugenia Perez University of Texas at Brownsville February
More informationInstructional Design Strategies for Teaching Technological Courses Online
Instructional Design Strategies for Teaching Technological s Online Jiangping Chen 1, Ryan Knudson 1, 1 Department of Library and Information Sciences, University North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #311068,
More informationContinuing Education and Knowledge Retention: A Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Deliveries
Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Articles University Libraries 4-1-2007 Continuing Education and Knowledge Retention: A Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Julie A. Garrison Grand Valley
More informationRunning head: INTERNET AND DISTANCE ED 1
Running head: INTERNET AND DISTANCE ED 1 Internet and Distance Education Delivery Models Jane Ford EDU 400 Prof. John Smith June 27, 2013 INTERNET AND DISTANCE ED 2 Internet and Distance Education Delivery
More informationKnowledge Management & E-Learning
Knowledge Management & E-Learning, Vol.5, No.3. Sep 2013 Knowledge Management & E-Learning ISSN 2073-7904 A brief examination of predictors of e-learning success for novice and expert learners Emily Stark
More informationAttrition in Online and Campus Degree Programs
Attrition in Online and Campus Degree Programs Belinda Patterson East Carolina University pattersonb@ecu.edu Cheryl McFadden East Carolina University mcfaddench@ecu.edu Abstract The purpose of this study
More informationAn Investigation on Learning of College Students and the Current Application Situation of the Web-based Courses
2011 International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology (ICCSIT 2011) IPCSIT vol. 51 (2012) (2012) IACSIT Press, Singapore DOI: 10.7763/IPCSIT.2012.V51.127 An Investigation on Learning
More informationUsing Classroom Community to Achieve Gender Equity in Online and Face-to-Face Graduate Classes
Advancing Women in Leadership Vol. 31, pp. 213-222, 2011 Available online at http://advancingwomen.com/awl/awl_wordpress/ ISSN 1093-7099 Full Length Research Paper Using Classroom Community to Achieve
More informationOnline Courses: An analysis of student satisfaction
Online Courses: An analysis of student satisfaction Franza, T., Williams, D., Morote, E. & Cunningham, J Purpose of Study Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine if existing student or instructor
More informationA CASE STUDY COMPARISON BETWEEN WEB-BASED AND TRADITIONAL GRADUATE LEVEL ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP INSTRUCTION
A CASE STUDY COMPARISON BETWEEN WEB-BASED AND TRADITIONAL GRADUATE LEVEL ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP INSTRUCTION Shari Koch, Instructional Designer imedia.it Christine D. Townsend, Professor and Head Kim E. Dooley,
More informationStudent Engagement Strategies in One Online Engineering and Technology Course
Paper ID #7674 Student Engagement Strategies in One Online Engineering and Technology Course Dr. Julie M Little-Wiles, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, IUPUI Dr. Julie Little-Wiles is a Visiting
More informationA COMPARISON OF COLLEGE AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN AN ONLINE IT FOUNDATIONS COURSE
A COMPARISON OF COLLEGE AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN AN ONLINE IT FOUNDATIONS COURSE Amy B. Woszczynski Kennesaw State University awoszczy@kennesaw.edu Debra Bass Geist Kennesaw State University dgeist1@students.kennesaw.edu
More informationComparison of Student Performance in an Online with traditional Based Entry Level Engineering Course
Comparison of Student Performance in an Online with traditional Based Entry Level Engineering Course Ismail I. Orabi, Ph.D. Professor of Mechanical Engineering School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
More informationEvaluation of the Pilot of the Desire2Learn Learning Management System Implemented in Fall 2013
Evaluation of the Pilot of the DesireLearn Learning Management System Implemented in Fall Mary Piontek, Ph.D - Indiana University Anastasia Morrone, Ph.D Indiana University December 8, Prepared by Center
More informationStudents Perception Toward the Use of Blackboard as a Course. Delivery Method. By Dr. Ibtesam Al mashaqbeh
Students Perception Toward the Use of Blackboard as a Course Delivery Method. By Dr. Ibtesam Al mashaqbeh Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate students perception toward the use of blackboard
More informationUsing Moodle Academy To Prepare Technical College Faculty for Online Teaching: An Evaluation Model
Using Moodle Academy To Prepare Technical College Faculty for Online Teaching: An Evaluation Model Ronald McBride, Ph.D. Northwestern State University College of Education Natchitoches, LA 71497 mcbride@nsula.edu
More informationThe purpose of this study was to determine what variables Arkansas Tech University
Capstone Project, Fall 2008 Group 2: Marsha Oels, Brandie Soar, Kathi Stewart, Sonya Thomas What variables do faculty associate with student success in online courses? Assessment presentation by Marsha
More informationLongwood University Faculty Senate PROPOSAL/POLICY COVER SHEET
Longwood University Faculty Senate PROPOSAL/POLICY COVER SHEET This cover sheet is intended to provide information to members of the Faculty Senate about a new proposal/policy or about revisions to an
More informationEvaluating Different Methods of Delivering Course Material: An Experiment in Distance Learning Using an Accounting Principles Course
Evaluating Different Methods of Delivering Course Material: An Experiment in Distance Learning Using an Accounting Principles Course Alexander R. Vamosi, Florida Institute of Technology Barbara G. Pierce,
More informationIssues in Information Systems Volume 13, Issue 2, pp. 193-200, 2012
EXPECTED ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF ONLINE LEARNING: PERCEPTIONS FROM COLLEGE STUDENTS WHO HAVE NOT TAKEN ONLINE COURSES Melody W. Alexander, Ball State University, malexander@bsu.edu Allen D. Truell,
More informationTeaching Hybrid Principles Of Finance To Undergraduate Business Students Can It Work? Denise Letterman, Robert Morris University
Teaching Hybrid Principles Of Finance To Undergraduate Business Students Can It Work? Denise Letterman, Robert Morris University ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between
More informationA Longitudinal Comparison of Online Versus Traditional Instruction
A Longitudinal Comparison of Online Versus Traditional Instruction Suzanne C. Wagner Niagara University Niagara University, NY14109 USA scwagner@niagara.edu Sheryl J. Garippo Niagara University Niagara
More informationUniversity of Michigan Dearborn Faculty Senate elearning Ad hoc Committee Report
University of Michigan Dearborn Faculty Senate elearning Ad hoc Committee Report Members: Stein Brunvand (SOE) Barbara Klein (COB) Pam McAuslan (CASL) Jonathan Smith (CASL) Don Rossin (at large) (COB)
More informationJournal of College Teaching & Learning August 2008 Volume 5, Number 8
A Comparison Of Student Outcomes And Student Satisfaction In Three MBA Human Resource Management Classes Based On Traditional Vs. Online Learning Jane Whitney Gibson, Nova Southeastern University, USA
More informationStrategies for Designing. An Orientation for Online Students. Norma Scagnoli. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
Strategies for Orientation. 1 Running head: STRATEGIES FOR ORIENTATION Strategies for Designing An Orientation for Online Students Norma Scagnoli University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Strategies for
More informationAN INVESTIGATION OF TRADITIONAL EDUCATION VS. FULLY-ONLINE EDUCATION IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
AN INVESTIGATION OF TRADITIONAL EDUCATION VS. FULLY-ONLINE EDUCATION IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Johnathan Yerby Middle Georgia State University Johnathan.Yerby@maconstate.edu Kevin Floyd Middle Georgia
More information2.12 DISTANCE EDUCATION OR EXECUTIVE DEGREE PROGRAMS
Criterion 2.12 DISTANCE EDUCATION OR EXECUTIVE DEGREE PROGRAMS If the school offers degree programs using formats or methods other than students attending regular on-site course sessions spread over a
More informationUsing a Learning Management System to Foster Independent Learning in an Outcome-Based University: A Gulf Perspective
Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Volume 7, 2010 Using a Learning Management System to Foster Independent Learning in an Outcome-Based University: A Gulf Perspective Azzedine Lansari
More informationCollege/School/Major Division Assessment Results for 2012-2013
College/School/Major Division Assessment Results for 2012-2013 1) College/School: School of Agriculture: Animal Science Unit 2) Review your student learning outcomes (SLOs). Please update as needed. The
More informationThe Impact of Online Teaching on Faculty Load: Computing the Ideal Class Size for Online Courses
Jl. of Technology and Teacher Education (2006) 14(3), 531-541 The Impact of Online Teaching on Faculty Load: Computing the Ideal Class Size for Online Courses LAWRENCE A. TOMEI Robert Morris University
More informationOnline International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, {Bi-Monthly}, ISSN 2249-9598, Volume-V, Issue-V, Sept-Oct 2015 Issue
Study of Employee Perception towards Performance Appraisal System with Special Reference to Education Sector in Pune City Sunanda Navale Founder Secretary, Sinhgad Technical Education Society, Ambegaon
More informationBlending Makes the Difference: Comparison of Blended and Traditional Instruction on Students Performance and Attitudes in Computer Literacy
Blending Makes the Difference: Comparison of Blended and Traditional Instruction on Students Performance and Attitudes in Computer Literacy Adem Uzun Aysan Senturk Uludag University, Turkey Abstract Purpose
More informationDefinitive Questions for Distance Learning Models
Definitive Questions for Distance Learning Models Nicole Meredith EDUC 6135-4 Dr. Ronald Paige February 11, 2012 Using the matrix on the next slide click on each of the links for more information. Distance
More informationExplorations in Online Learning using Adobe Connect
99 International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 99-110, December 2015 Explorations in Online Learning using Adobe Connect Deirdre Englehart University of Central
More informationTexas Higher Education Coordinating Board
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Master s Universities Success Accountability Measures Introduction The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board has organized the Master s Level Universities
More informationNRMERA 2011 Distinguished Paper. Instructors Perceptions of Community and Engagement in Online Courses
Kennedy, A., Young, S., & Bruce, M. A. (2012). Instructors perceptions of community and engagement in online courses. The Researcher, 24(2), 74-81. NRMERA 2011 Distinguished Paper Instructors Perceptions
More informationTeachers Perception for Adoption of Instructional Technology in Schools
nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE 01) Teachers Perception for Adoption of Instructional Technology in Schools Nurul Huda Mas od,* Mohd Emran Ngadiman, Seth Sulaiman Faculty
More informationDRAFT LAMC Addendum to the Course Outline of Record Course Approval Application for Online/Distance Learning Delivery
Date of Submission: DRAFT LAMC Addendum to the Course Outline of Record Course Approval Application for Online/Distance Learning Delivery Credit and Acknowledgements: Special thanks and credit to both
More informationInstructional Strategies: What Do Online Students Prefer?
Instructional Strategies: What Do Online Students Prefer? Kristen Cuthrell Assistant Professor East Carolina University College of Education Curriculum and Instruction Greenville, NC USA cuthrellma@ecu.edu
More informationEffective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION, 21(3), 117 132 Copyright 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies Jorge Gaytan University of West Georgia
More information