MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Transcription

1 MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2401 S.E. MONTEREY ROAD STUART, FL DOUG SMITH Commissioner, District 1 ED FIELDING Commissioner, District 2 ANNE SCOTT Commissioner, District 3 SARAH HEARD Commissioner, District 4 JOHN HADDOX Commissioner, District 5 TARYN KRYZDA, CPM County Administrator MICHAEL D. DURHAM County Attorney June 24, 2016 Captec Engineering C/O Joseph W. Capra, P.E. 301 Nw Flagler Ave. Stuart, FL RE: Dear Joe, Telephone: Fax: [email protected] Daystar Storage Administrative Amendment Staff Report (D ) The staff report for the Daystar Storage Administrative Amendment request is enclosed for your careful review. A Joint Applicant/Staff Workshop meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, June 30, 2016 at 10:30 am in the Martin County Growth Management Department Joint Workshop Room (1st Floor). The purpose of the meeting will be to review the staff report with you and answer any questions you might have about the report. Please let me know as soon as possible if the scheduling is acceptable. Following the joint workshop meeting, any re-submittal materials that you intend to provide in response to the staff report should be sent to my attention. You are requested to respond in writing, utilizing the item-by-item format of the sections of the staff report. Your re-submittal must contain one (1) original packet and a bookmarked electronic disc which is an identical copy of the original packet, along with two (2) paper copies of the plans. Upon receipt, the resubmitted materials will be transmitted for review to the appropriate review agencies and individuals that participate in the County's review process. Article 10, Section 10.2.D.3. pertaining to review cycles follows: TELEPHONE WEB ADDRESS 3. Planned Unit Developments and Developments of Regional Impact shall be allowed three (3) resubmittals without payment of a resubmittal fee. All other development applications noted in Section 10.1.D are allowed a single resubmittal of application materials, without payment of additional review fees. Up to two (2) additional submittals (hereinafter referred to as "elective submittals") shall be allowed with payment of a resubmittal fee. The resubmittal fee for elective submittals shall be established by resolution, taking into consideration the non-substantial or substantial nature of the elective resubmittal and the magnitude of the review required of any revised portion of the application. The applicant shall have ninety (90) days from the issuance date of the report to resubmit. The County Administrator may grant one (1) extension not to exceed 60 days upon a showing of good cause. 1 of 21 gmd2016l483.docx

2 Joseph W. Capra, P.E June 24, 2016 Page 2 If the applicant fails to meet the resubmittal deadline including any approved extension period, the application shall be terminated, unless the applicant gives notice that an elective resubmittal will be made. The elective resubmittal shall be made within 90 days from the date the prior resubmittal was due, and shall include the resubmittal fee established by resolution. All traffic studies, surveys and other documents that have expired must be updated by the applicant. The applicant's resubmittal may include a request that disputed items be transmitted to the final decision maker for resolution. The next resubmittal will be the third submittal for this application. The third submittal requires a resubmittal review fee in the amount of $2,188. Sincerely, Paul Schilling Principal Planner PS:sh 2 of 21 gmd2016l483.docx

3 { MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF REPORT A. Application Information DAYSTAR STORAGE ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT Applicant and Property Owner: Daystar Properties II, LLC Agent for the Applicant: Captec Engineering, Joseph W. Capra, P.E. County Project Coordinator: Paul Schilling, Principal Planner Growth Management Director: Nicki van Vonno, AICP Project Number: D Application Type and Number: D Report Number: 2016_0624_D _DRT_Staff_FINAL Application Received: 09/21/2015 Transmitted: 09/22/2015 Date of Report: 10/30/2015 Joint Workshop: 11/12/2015 Resubmittal Received: 05/04/2016 Transmitted: 05/04/2016 Date of Report: 06/24/2016 B. Project description and analysis Request for an administrative amendment to the approved final site plan. The proposed changes include the extension of the existing open storage area for equipment, business vehicles, RV's and boats and construction of a surface water management system to serve the existing and proposed storage area. The subject property is approximately 10.5 acres and located at the Southwest corner of Bridge Road and Flora Avenue in Hobe Sound. The westerly portion of the site is currently being used as an open storage yard and the easterly portion of the site is comprised of existing office/storage buildings and parking lot which is currently in use by Treasure Coast Irrigation. The northerly portion of the site is zoned B-3, Rural Business District and the southerly portion is zoned M-1, Industrial District. The entire site is designated for Industrial on the Future Land Use Map. The current use of open storage yard is a permitted use under the current zoning districts of B-3 Rural Business and M-1 Industrial. The current Category C zoning districts are consistent with the future land use designation of Industrial. The Daystar Storage project received revised final site plan approval on December 17, 2009 for an existing open storage area. On December 9, 2011, the applicants request for a statutory timetable extension from December 17, 2013, to December 17, 2015 was acknowledged. The current request for an administrative amendment to the approved final site plan includes the extension of the existing open 3 of 21

4 storage area for equipment, business vehicles, RV's and boats and construction of a surface water management system to serve the existing and proposed storage area. C. Staff recommendation The specific findings and conclusion of each review agency related to this request are identified in Sections F through T of this report. The current review status for each agency is as follows: Section Division or Department Reviewer Phone Assessment F Comprehensive Plan Paul Schilling Non-Comply F ARDP Samantha Lovelady N/A G Development Review Paul Schilling Non-Comply H Urban Design Paul Schilling N/A H Community Redevelopment Paul Schilling N/A I Property Management Colleen Holmes Comply J Environmental Shawn McCarthy Comply J Landscaping Karen Sjoholm Non-Comply K Transportation Stephanie Piche Non-Comply L County Surveyor Michael O Brien N/A M Engineering Michelle Cullum Non-Comply N Addressing Emily Kohler Comply N Electronic File Submission Emily Kohler Comply O Water and Wastewater James Christ Comply O Wellfields James Christ Comply P Fire Prevention Doug Killane Comply P Emergency Management Debra McCaughey N/A Q ADA Judy Lamb Non-Comply R Health Department Todd Reinhold N/A R School Board Kimberly Everman N/A S County Attorney Krista Storey N/A T Adequate Public Facilities Paul Schilling Review Pending D. Review Board action This application complies with the threshold requirement for processing as a minor development. As such, final action on this application will be taken by the Growth Management Director. E. Location and site information Parcel number(s) and address: SE Bridge Rd SW Bridge Rd Existing zoning: B-3 Rural Business, M-1 Industrial Future land use: Industrial Commission district: 3 Municipal service taxing unit: Southern MSTU Planning area: South County Page 2 of 19 4 of 21

5 Taxing district: District C Traffic analysis zone: 79 The subject property is located at the SW corner of Bridge Road and Flora Avenue in Hobe Sound. LOCATION MAP Page 3 of 19 5 of 21

6 2014 AERIAL IMAGE Page 4 of 19 6 of 21

7 F. Determination of compliance with Comprehensive Growth Management Plan requirements - Growth Management Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Generic Comp Plan Compliance-GMD This application cannot be deemed to be in compliance with the Martin County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP) until the issues identified in this report have been satisfactorily resolved. [Martin County, Fla., CGMP, Section 1.3] G. Determination of compliance with land use, site design standards, zoning, and procedural requirements - Growth Management Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Site Plan A complete site plan is required as part of the application pursuant to Section 10.2.B., LDR, Martin County, Fla. 1. As part of the resubmittal dated 5/04/2016, the only revision note on the revised final site plan is dated 9/02/15. This does not make sense because the applicant has indicated the plan was revised as part of the resubmittal dated 5/04/2016. Please add the revision dates accordingly. 2. Indicate required ADA parking for the TC Irrigation employees parking lot. See Section Q of this report. Item #2: Off-Street Parking Per Section G, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2009), for the purpose of computing parking requirements based on the number of employees, calculations shall be for the largest number of persons working on any single shift, including owners and managers. The number of employees increased from 24 in the initial submittal to 94 in the resubmittal. Revise the parking rate calculation to be based on the largest number of employees for a single shift, not the total number of employees in the company. Provide a parking rate adjustment. [Martin County, Fla. LDR, Section (2009)] Item #2: Disclosure Requirements Please submit a completed financial disclosure affidavit form. [Martin County, Fla., LDR Section 10.2.B.3.] Page 5 of 19 7 of 21

8 Item #3: Development Order Requirement 1. The owner shall dedicate a 15-foot wide strip of land adjacent to the existing CR-708 (SE Bridge Road) right-of-way to the Martin County Board of County Commissioners to be used as right-ofway. This dedication shall be completed and the property shall be transferred within 60 days of the approval of the Revised Final Site Plan. 2. The owner shall pay to the County a fee in-lieu of construction for that portion of the sidewalk along the south side of SE Bridge Road (a major arterial) from the western property line to the intersection of SE Flora Avenue and for that portion of the sidewalk along the west side of SE Flora Avenue (a minor collector) from the south property line to the intersection of SE Bridge Road. The total property frontage is 893 feet along SE Bridge Road and 547 along SE Flora Avenue. The fee is $25 per linear foot, for a resultant payment of $36,000. Additional Information: Information #1: The next resubmittal will be the third submittal for this application. The third submittal requires a resubmittal review fee in the amount of $2,188. [Martin County, Fla., LDR, Section10.2.D.3] Information #2: Required Permits The applicant has elected Option 2 regarding Agency permit submittal for a consistency review after project approval. Prior to scheduling the mandatory pre-construction meeting for construction commencement authorization, all applicable local, state, and federal approved permits are to be submitted for review by the County Administrator with remittance of a $ review fee. If an application is made to any permitting agency for a modification to a permit that was required to be issued prior to final site plan approval, the application for the permit modification must be submitted concurrently to Martin County. [Martin County, Fla., LDR, Section 10.9.A] H. Determination of compliance with the urban design and community redevelopment requirements Community Development Department Commercial Design The proposed changes include the extension of the existing open storage proposed. Therefore, the Commercial Design reviewer was not required to review this application. [Martin County, Fla., LDR Section B.] Community Redevelopment Area The proposed project is not located within a Community Redevelopment Area. Therefore, the Community Redevelopment Area reviewer was not required to review this application. [Martin County, Fla., LDR Article 3, Division 6] Page 6 of 19 8 of 21

9 I. Determination of compliance with the property management requirements Engineering Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Property Management Bridge Road has been classified as a Minor Arterial under Sec , Roadway Classification. The minimum right of way width requirements for each roadway classification are set forth in Section B., Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2001) and Table , Right of Way Requirements. Sec B. also provides that additional width may be necessary as determined by the County Engineer, depending upon the approved roadway cross section, design elements within the right of way and the drainage requirements for the area. Also, right of way requirements may be adjusted by the County Engineer for specific roadways involving intersection right of way improvements or restrictions of Martin County or the Florida Department of Transportation. It has been determined that a dedication of 15 feet of right of way is required on Bridge Road by the Applicant. A Condition of Approval requiring the conveyance of the dedicated property to Martin County during the post approval process will be included in the Development Order. If the dedication is part of a Plat approval application, the dedication will be included on the plat and the conveyance of the dedicated property will take place simultaneously with the recording of the Plat. The following due diligence materials are required: Item #2: Title Commitment The following is required: 1. An original title commitment for the proposed dedication site(s). 2. The proposed insured is: Martin County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida. 3. The amount of title insurance is subject to approval by the Martin County Real Property Division. 4. Legible copies of all documents listed as Schedule B-II Exceptions must be provided. The Applicant has provided the required Title Commitment. The following title issues must be addressed prior to conveyance of the right of way during the post approval process. Paragraph 6 of the BII Exceptions is a Notice of Environmental Resource or Surface Water Management Permit recorded in Official Records Book 2411, Page Pursuant to the Notice, South Florida Water Management must be notified in writing of the property transfer as required by the permit and proof of the notification must be provided to the County. Page 7 of 19 9 of 21

10 Paragraph 10 of the BII Exceptions lists two Deeds of Conservation Easement, the first recorded in Official Records Book 2465, Page 1761 and the second recorded in Official Records Book 2550, Page The applicant must obtain a release of both Deeds of Conservation Easement from South Florida Water Management District releasing the 15 feet being conveyed to Martin County. Paragraph 11 of the BII Exceptions regarding unrecorded leases must be deleted. Item #3: Survey The following is required: 1. Two (2) original signed and sealed surveys of the dedication site(s). 2. The survey must state that it was - Prepared with the benefit of a Title Commitment - and include the Commitment Number, Name of Title Company and Date and Time of the Commitment. Also include the subject parcel ID number(s). 3. All title exceptions that can be plotted must be shown on the survey. 4. The legal description for the dedication site(s) on the survey must match the legal description on the proposed Plat or Planned Unit Development (PUD) if applicable. 5. The survey must be certified to Martin County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and to the Title Company. 6. Two (2) original signed and sealed sketch and legal descriptions of the dedication site. The Applicant has provided the required Survey. Item #4: Environmental Site Assessment Phase I The following is required: 1. A Phase I report stating that there are No Recognized Environmental Conditions in accordance with the current standards of the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM15271). 2. The Phase I report must be dated within 180 days of submission, or include a current updated letter from the ESA firm. 3. The Phase I report or update letter must include a statement that Martin County can rely on the results of the report. The Applicant has provided the required Environmental Site Assessment - Phase I. J. Determination of compliance with environmental and landscaping requirements - Growth Management Department Environmental Findings of Compliance: The Growth Management Department Environmental Division staff has reviewed the application and Page 8 of of 21

11 finds it in compliance with the applicable Land Development Regulations. Environmental reporting by the applicant's environmental consultant has demonstrated the established and approved preserve area is in compliance with the approved PAMP. The proposed activities with this application do not propose to modify or change the preserve area or PAMP. Additional Information: Information #1: As a reminder, the portion of wetland buffer approved for clearing for construction of the water management system outfall structure shall be replanted in accordance with the approved PAMP and pursuant to MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR, SECTION 4.2.I. (2016). Replanting must be completed prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) for any associated building permit. Please indicate, and provide documentation as needed, if the jurisdictional wetland determination approved by the South Florida Water Management District in 2006 is still valid. In addition, the average and seasonal high water table wetland elevations were used to set the control elevation for the water management system. Are these wetland elevations still accurate? Please explain. Landscape Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Perimeter Vua Requirements-Non-Res Sites Please demonstrate compliance with the following criteria for perimeter vehicular use areas (Section A.4.a., LDR) a. A ten-foot wide strip of land, exclusive of curbing, along the entire front perimeter of a site, located between the front property line and any vehicular use area, shall be landscaped. Berming is encouraged along public roadway frontages to screen parking areas and provide visual interest. b. A ten-foot wide strip of land, exclusive of curbing, along the entire side and rear perimeter of a site, located between the side and rear property lines and any vehicular use area, shall be landscaped. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: A perimeter vua landscape area needs to be provided along the north and south sides of the storage yard The landscape plan indicates the perimeter VUA buffer along Bridge Road is 23 feet wide. The site plan indicates the dimension along this area is divided into a 15 foot ROW dedication and a 10 ft. landscape area. Please reconcile and determine if trees claimed as preserved trees are on site or within the right-of-way. No VUA area has been provided along the south perimeter. Since the adjacent property is vacant Section A.4.a.2, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, FL [2013] provides that required vua landscaping can be reduced by 50%, a 5 ft. minimum landscape shall still be required. Page 9 of of 21

12 Item #2: Landscape Tabular Data Landscape plans shall include a table which lists the gross and net acreage, acreage of development and preservation areas, number of trees and tree clusters to be protected within the developed area and within perimeter areas, and square footage of vehicular use areas (Ref. Section A.10, LDR). Interior and perimeter vehicular use areas should be quantified separately in the table. Tabular data shall also indicate a calculation of the minimum total number of trees and shrubs required to be planted based upon the proposed developed area and separately based upon quantities required to meet the vehicular use area planting requirements and any required bufferyard requirements. Please also include the following: a. Document compliance with the requirement that twenty (20) percent of the total developed area shall be landscaped. b. Document that nonresidential developments provide at least one tree per 2,500 square feet of site area. c. Identify each species intended to meet the required trees, shrubs, and ground cover separately in the tabular data. Tabular data shall also indicate calculations of the minimum total number of trees and shrubs to be planted based upon the proposed developed area and separately based upon quantities required to meet vehicular use planting requirements and bufferyard requirements. Service function areas including solid waste collection and mechanical equipment requiring screening shall be summarized in a table to identify equipment and the type of screening proposed. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Calculations of developed area are not clear. The landscape plan states that the development area is 173,804 sf but the development area should include the entire site minus preserve areas and right-of-way to be dedicated. Please clarify and reconcile with site plan. VUA Site data calculation discusses north landscape area and west (?) landscape area, no landscape area is required on the west. Required trees should be calculated for entire site. Item #3: Landscape Native Tree Protect & Survey A tree survey is required to identify specific native trees required to be protected from development [Section 4.666, LDR]. Please note that trees in proposed preservation areas, palm trees and non-native species need not be identified on this survey. Existing native vegetation shall be retained to act as buffers between adjacent land uses, and to minimize nuisance dust noise and air pollution during construction. The following information shall be provided for trees in the developed area: 1. A tree survey including approximate position of protected trees, protected tree clusters, landscaping and other vegetation to be preserved or removed. Trees required to be protected include any native hardwood tree four (4) inches DBH or greater, or any native softwood tree including pine trees (8) inches DBH or greater which is located in the perimeter area of any development site. Clearly identify the specific tree species required to be protected on the survey; these trees should be flagged in the field for staff verification. Page 10 of of 21

13 2. As a condition of the issuance of a permit for removal of a protected tree, a satisfactory plan shall be presented by the applicant for the successful replacement of trees to be removed, based on the schedule found in Section D., LDRs. Such schedule may be offset by the tree preservation schedule, for protected trees to be retained on site, as found in Section F., LDRs. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: The site plan and construction plans show numerous trees not shown on the tree survey. Sizes are also not consistent with sizes shown on the tree survey. All plans should be consistent with location and size accurately shown. Any protected trees previously documented should be shown as either protected or removed and mitigated for, this would include within the southern perimeter area. Tree survey should not claim preservation credit for trees planted to meet landscape requirements for Parcel A. These trees can be utilized to meet requirements of Section B.1. Item #4: Construction Standards - Tree Protection Please provide for the locations, construction and maintenance requirements of tree protection barricades on the appropriate pages of the landscape and construction plans [Section B., LDR]. The following shall be included on the land-clearing page: 1. Location of protected trees with tree protection barricades, where warranted. Barricades must be constructed around the critical protection zone of each tree or cluster of trees. 2. Construction details for the installation of erosion control devices and tree protection barricades. All barricades must be maintained intact for the duration of construction. 3. Construction standards/criteria that states: During periods of development and construction, the areas within the drip-line of preserved trees shall be maintained at their original grade with pervious landscape material. Within these areas, there shall be no trenching or cutting of roots; no fill, compaction or removal of soil; and, no use of concrete, paint, chemicals or other foreign substances. 4. These barricades must be constructed of a minimum of one-fourth-inch diameter rope which is yellow or orange in color and made of nylon or poly. The rope is to be attached to a minimum of 2 2 wooden poles, iron rebar, two inches or greater PVC pipe or other material with prior approval of the Growth Management Department. The rope must be a minimum of four feet off the ground and may not be attached to any vegetation. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Preserved trees, barricades, and barricade details must be shown on landscape and construction drawings. The erosion control plan shows the silt fence to be installed along the property lines on the north and south. There is no indication which trees are to be protected or how, The contractor will not have a clear understanding of what is required. Since the landscape plans utilizes the same symbol for existing and preserved slash pines it is not clear which are existing trees and which are to be planted. Please clarify. Page 11 of of 21

14 Item #5: Preserve Area Interface Requirements Please provide for the following planting requirements, pursuant to Sec E., LDR: A preserve area interface shall be established between required landscaping and stormwater treatment areas and preservation areas when preservation areas exist on a development site and when preserve areas abut a development site. The preserve area interface shall include a consolidation and connection of landscaping and stormwater treatment areas with preservation areas. Where more than one preservation area exists on a development site or abutting a development site multiple preserve area interfaces shall be created. Within the preserve area interface the use of plant materials shall be restricted to native species. The following preserve area interface criteria shall be documented and met for all development sites where preservation areas are identified and where preserve areas have been identified adjacent to a development site: 1. Stormwater management systems. Plantings within dry retention and detention stormwater areas abutting preserve areas shall be restricted to native trees, native shrubs and native groundcovers. Wet retention and detention stormwater areas abutting preserve areas shall be designed and planted as littoral and upland transition zone areas (preserve area interface) and connected to preserve areas pursuant to Article 4, Division 8, LDR, MCC. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Dry retention area adjacent to the preserve must be planted with native species. Revise plans accordingly. K. Determination of compliance with transportation requirements - Engineering Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Traffic Impact acres of vehicular storage is proposed. Utilize the ITE Trip Generation for Mini-Warehouse (per acre) as this is the most closely related use. 2. The % Project Traffic in Table 2, should include only the PM Peak hour direction for each link. 3. Revise Figure 1 and Table 2 for consistency with the net new trips generated. L. Determination of compliance with county surveyor - Engineering Department The applicant has indicated that there are no proposed changes to property dedications or to the previously approved project or phase boundaries as part of the current application. Therefore, the Engineering Department was not required to review this application for consistency with the Martin County Codes for survey requirements contained in Article 4 of the Land Development Regulations. [Martin County, Fla., LDR Section 10.1.F.] Page 12 of of 21

15 M. Determination of compliance with engineering, storm water and flood management requirements - Engineering Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Off-Street Parking Per Section G, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2009), for the purpose of computing parking requirements based on the number of employees, calculations shall be for the largest number of persons working on any single shift, including owners and managers. The number of employees increased from 24 in the initial submittal to 94 in the resubmittal. Revise the parking rate calculation to be based on the largest number of employees for a single shift, not the total number of employees in the company. Provide a parking rate adjustment. [Martin County, Fla. LDR, Section (2009)] Item #2: Stormwater Mgmt Pre-Development The pre-development runoff rate was determined by using a SFWMD Permit for an adjacent property. If referencing a previously permitted SFWMD Permit to determine the pre-development runoff rate, the SFWMD Permit should be the existing permit for this particular site, ERP # P Application # The allowable discharge rate shall be 0.34cfs/acre (1.21 cfs). Item #3: Stormwater Mgmt Post-Development Provide a recovery analysis that demonstrates the dry detention system recovers half the treatment volume between 24 hours and 5 days and 90% of the 25-year three-day runoff volume in 12 days from cessation of the storm event. [Martin County, Fla. LDR Section F.4.c (2015)]. Item #4: Development Order Requirement 1. The owner shall dedicate a 15-foot wide strip of land adjacent to the existing CR-708 (SE Bridge Road) right-of-way to the Martin County Board of County Commissioners to be used as right-ofway. This dedication shall be completed and the property shall be transferred within 60 days of the approval of the Revised Final Site Plan. 2. The owner shall pay to the County a fee in-lieu of construction for that portion of the sidewalk along the south side of SE Bridge Road (a major arterial) from the western property line to the intersection of SE Flora Avenue and for that portion of the sidewalk along the west side of SE Flora Avenue (a minor collector) from the south property line to the intersection of SE Bridge Road. The total property frontage is 893 feet along SE Bridge Road and 547 along SE Flora Avenue. The fee is $25 per linear foot, for a resultant payment of $36,000. N. Determination of compliance with addressing and electronic file submittal requirements Growth Management and Information Technology Departments Addressing Findings of Compliance: The application has been reviewed for compliance with Division 17, Addressing, of the Martin County Page 13 of of 21

16 Land Development Regulations. Staff finds that the proposed site plan / plat complies with applicable addressing regulations. This business has an existing address that meets current addressing regulations of Article 4, Division l, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. ([2016]) Electronic File Submittal Findings of Compliance: The Information Services Department staff has reviewed the electronic file submittal and finds it in compliance with the applicable county requirements. Both AutoCAD site plan and boundary survey were received and found to be in compliance with Section 10.2.B.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. ([2016]) Both AutoCAD site plan and boundary survey were in State Plane coordinates and found to be in compliance with Section 10.2.B.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. ([2016]) The AutoCAD boundary survey was received and found to be in compliance with Section 10.2.B.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. ([2016]) O. Determination of compliance with utilities requirements - Utilities Department Water and Wastewater Service Findings of Compliance: This development application has been reviewed for compliance with applicable statutes and ordinances and the reviewer finds it in compliance with Martin County's requirements for water and wastewater level of service. [Martin County, Fla., LDR, Division 6 and 7] Wellfield and Groundwater Protection Findings of Compliance: The application has been reviewed for compliance under the Wellfield Protection Program. The reviewer finds the application in compliance with the Wellfield Protection and Groundwater Protection Ordinances. [Martin County, Fla., LDR, Division 5] P. Determination of compliance with fire prevention and emergency management requirements Fire Rescue Department Fire Prevention Findings of Compliance: The Fire Prevention Bureau finds this submittal to be in compliance with the applicable provisions governing construction and life safety standards. This occupancy shall comply with all applicable provisions of governing codes whether implied or not in this review, in addition to all previous requirements of prior reviews. Page 14 of of 21

17 Q. Determination of compliance with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements - General Services Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: ADA Site / Program The site alterations must include accessible features including accessible parking and accessible routes associated with this plan request. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Indicate required ADA parking for the TC Irrigation employees parking lot. 5/10/ Proposed site plan shows 57 parking spaces with 2 ADA spaces. per FBC Accessibility states 51 to 75 parking spaces would require 3 ADA spaces R. Determination of compliance with Martin County Health Department and Martin County School Board Martin County Health Department There are no onsite potable wells or septic disposal systems, pursuant to Section 10.1.F, LDR, Martin County, Fla. Therefore, the Department of Health was not required to review this application for consistency with the Martin County Codes. Martin County School Board The applicant has indicated that this application is for non-residential uses only. Therefore the Martin County School Board was not required to review this application for school concurrency evaluation. [Martin County, Fla., LDR Section 10.1.F.] S. Determination of compliance with legal requirements - County Attorney's Office N/A T. Determination of compliance with the adequate public facilities requirements - responsible departments The following is a summary of the review for compliance with the standards contained in Article 5.32.D of the Adequate Public Facilities, Land Development Regulations (LDR's), Martin County Code for a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities Reservation. Potable water facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.a, LDR) Service provider - SMRU Findings in place Source - Utilities and Solid Waste Department Page 15 of of 21

18 Reference - see Section O of this staff report Sanitary sewer facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.b, LDR) Service provider - SMRU Findings in place Source - Utilities and Solid Waste Department Reference - see Section O of this staff report Solid waste facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.c, LDR) Findings in place Source - Growth Management Department Stormwater management facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.d, LDR) Findings review pending Source - Engineering Department Reference - see Section M of this staff report Community park facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.e, LDR) Findings in place Source - Growth Management Department Roads facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.f, LDR) Findings review pending Source - Engineering Department Reference - see Section K of this staff report Mass transit facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.g, LDR) Findings - in place Source - Engineering Department Reference - see Section K of this staff report Public safety facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.h, LDR) Findings - in place Source - Growth Management Department Reference - see Section P of this staff report Public school facilities (Section 5.32.D.3.i, LDR) Findings - in place Source - Growth Management Department Reference - see Section R of this staff report A timetable for completion consistent with the valid duration of the development is to be included in the Certificate of Public Facilities Reservation. The development encompassed by Reservation Certificate must be completed within the timetable specified for the type of development. Page 16 of of 21

19 U. Post-approval requirements Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant s submittal of all required documents, executed where appropriate, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), including unpaid fees, within sixty (60) days of the final action granting approval. Item #1: Post Approval Requirements List: After approval the applicant will receive a letter and a Post Approval Requirements List that identifies the documents and fees required. The applicant will return the Post Approval Requirements List along with the required documents in a packet with the documents arranged in the order shown on the list. Item #2: Post Approval Fees: The applicant is required to pay all remaining fees when submitting the post approval packet. If an extension is granted, the fees must be paid within 60 days from the date of the development order. Checks should be made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners. Item #3: Recording Costs: The applicant is responsible for all recording costs. The Growth Management Department will calculate the recording costs and contact the applicant with the payment amount required. Checks should be made payable to the Martin County Clerk of Court. Item #4: One (1) copy of the recorded warranty deed if a property title transfer has occurred since the site plan approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the approval, provide a letter stating that no title transfer has occurred. Item #5: Ten (10) complete copies of the approved amended construction plans signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida. Fold to 8 by 12 inches. Item #6: Ten (10) copies 24" x 36"of the approved amended site plan. Item #7: Original approved amended site plan on Mylar or other plastic, stable material. Item #8: One (1) digital copy of amended site plan in AutoCAD 2006 or 2007 drawing format (.dwg). The digital version of the site plan must match the hardcopy version as submitted. Page 17 of of 21

20 Item #9: Original of the construction schedule. Item #10: Original of the Engineer's Design Certification, on the County format which is available on the Martin County website, signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida. Item #11: Two (2) copies of the documents verifying that the right-of-way along CR-708 (SE Bridge Road) has been adequately dedicated to the Board of County Commissioners and recorded in the public records of Martin County. V. Local, State, and Federal Permits Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant's submittal of all required applicable Local, State, and Federal Permits, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), prior to the commencement of any construction. An additional review fee will be required for Martin County to verify that the permits are consistent with the approved development order. Item #1: STORMWATER MGMT PERMITS A modification to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) must be submitted prior to scheduling a Pre-Construction meeting. W. Fees Public advertising fees for the development order will be determined and billed subsequent to the public hearing. Fees for this application are calculated as follows: Fee type: Fee amount: Fee payment: Balance: Application review fees: $3, $3, $0.00 Site inspection fees: $4, $0.00 $4, Resubmittal fees: $2, $0.00 $2, Advertising fees*: TBD Recording fees**: TBD Mandatory impact fees: TBD Non-mandatory impact fees: TBD * Advertising fees will be determined once the ads have been placed and billed to the County. ** Recording fees will be identified on the post approval checklist. X. General application information Applicant: Daystar Properties II, LLC Scott Fay Page 18 of of 21

21 7900 SE Bridge Rd. Hobe Sound, FL Agent: Captec Engineering Joseph W. Capra, P.E. 301 NW Flagler Ave. Stuart, FL Y. Acronyms ADA... Americans with Disability Act AHJ... Authority Having Jurisdiction ARDP... Active Residential Development Preference BCC... Board of County Commissioners CGMP... Comprehensive Growth Management Plan CIE... Capital Improvements Element CIP... Capital Improvements Plan FACBC... Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction FDEP... Florida Department of Environmental Protection FDOT... Florida Department of Transportation LDR... Land Development Regulations LPA... Local Planning Agency MCC... Martin County Code MCHD... Martin County Health Department NFPA... National Fire Protection Association SFWMD... South Florida Water Management District W/WWSA... Water/Waste Water Service Agreement Z. Attachments Page 19 of of 21