Implementation of GS1 ecom Standards in Detailed Report. The global language of business

Transcription

1 Implementation of GS1 ecom Standards in 2014 Detailed Report The global language of business

2 Document Summary Document Item Current Value Document Title Implementation of GS1 ecom Standards in 2014 Author Date Last Modified Current Document Version 1 Summary of Changes Status Document Description (one sentence summary) Ewa Iwicka Data Systems Manager Anders Grangard Director, GS1 ecom New document Final This document provides users with the overview of the use of ecom standards in GS1 member countries. Table of Contents 1. Introduction Scope and objective Target audience Caveats Structure of the document Additional information General ecom implementation statistics EANCOM Number of EANCOM and implemented versions EANCOM message implementations GS1 XML Number of GS1 XML and implemented versions GS1 XML message implementations GS1 profiles of the UN/CEFACT XML messages Use of Invoice ecom messages: EANCOM and GS1 XML Web EDI Non GS1 ecom standards and solutions Communication methods used to exchange ecom messages ecom implementation overview since 2005 and future trends Sectors using ecom standards Use of ecom standards in Transport and Logistics Use of ecom standards in Healthcare Use of ecom standards in Public Procurement Appendix List of ecom related projects and / or experiences All contents copyright GS

3 1. Introduction 1.1 Scope and objective This report presents the implementation of ecom standards in the year It is based on the answers of 72 Member Organisations, of which 54 have reported some form of ecom usage in their countries. The report covers the implementation of GS1 ecom standards - GS1 XML, GS1 Profiles of the UN/CEFACT XML and GS1 EANCOM in detail: Type and versions of standards implemented Number of implementing companies Specific messages implemented Implementation of ecom standards in core GS1 sectors: Transport & Logistics, Healthcare and Public Procurement Communication methods used for exchanging ecom messages Member Organisation activities in the area of ecom There is also general information about Web EDI, non-gs1 ecom standards and proprietary solutions. We asked similar questions to those from previous years, to provide comparable data. Information included in this report should give a good overview of the business processes in which ecom standards are implemented worldwide as well as the scope of implementation. 1.2 Target audience The primary target audience of this report is the GS1 Global Office and GS1 Member Organisations. The GS1 Global Office uses the survey results to update the ecom strategy and define the future of ecom. Information obtained during the survey helps in discovering the marketing, communication and training needs of Member Organisations and their users. It allows taking decisions based on the actual market situation, rather than assumptions. The GS1 Member Organisations benefit from the survey results by being able to compare the situation in their market with what is happening in other countries. Knowing what is being implemented where, it is easier to seek assistance when similar needs arise in their country. They can also estimate how the situation may develop in their market, based on information from other countries. It is particularly useful in supporting user companies with the cross-border business relationship. However, the information presented can also be useful to GS1 user companies, industry associations, ecom solution providers and other standard development organisations. It enables them to benchmark their own actual or planned implementation with user groups from their own and other countries. The overview of the market trends may also be a valuable aid in taking decisions about the ecom implementation. When sharing with external bodies or member companies, Member Organisations may wish to adjust the text to suit the intended audience. 1.3 Caveats Data reported in the survey are sometimes based on estimation made by GS1 Member Organisations, sometimes on surveys conducted on the local markets and information obtained from ecom solution All contents copyright GS

4 providers. Thus, the implementation report should not be considered as a scientific research, but as an illustration of market trends. However, the estimation is made by people the most suitable for that: the GS1 Member Organisation staff members, having daily contact with their user community and often assisting them in implementation. 1.4 Structure of the document The report is divided into eleven major sections: 1. Introduction 2. General ecom standards implementation statistics 3. EANCOM 4. GS1 XML 5. GS1 Profiles of the UN/CEFACT XML 6. Web EDI 7. Non GS1 ecom Standards 8. Communication methods used to send EDI messages 9. ecom implementation overview since 2005 and future trends 10. Use of ecom standards in Transport & Logistics, Healthcare and Public Procurement The ninth section contains a short analysis of the ecom implementation trends, based on data between 2005 and 2014, as well as estimation for year The Appendices contain the list of ecom related projects and experiences, which Member Organisations are willing to share with the GS1 Community, and the general comments received from the Member Organisations. 1.5 Additional information We are confident that this survey will be of high interest to you and we invite you to visit our website if you would like to have further information regarding our organisation and/or the standards we offer. An electronic version of this report can be downloaded from the GS1 website: We are open to any comments on any information you would like to see in this report, so that it could best suit your needs in the future. ou can submit your comments via the GS1 website All contents copyright GS

5 2. General ecom implementation statistics 54 MOs reported that various ecom standards have been implemented in their countries in Table 1 List of countries where ecom technologies are used: Country GS1 XML UN/CEFACT Profiles EANCOM Country GS1 XML UN/CEFACT Profiles EANCOM Argentina Macedonia Australia Malaysia Austria Mexico Belarus Netherlands Belgium & Luxembourg New Zealand Bolivia Nicaragua Bosnia & Herzegovina Norway Brazil Paraguay Bulgaria Philippines Canada Poland Chile Russia Costa Rica Serbia Croatia Singapore Czech Republic Slovakia Denmark Slovenia Finland South Africa France Spain Germany Sweden Greece Switzerland Hong Kong Tunisia 3 * * Hungary Turkey India * * UK Ireland Ukraine Italy Uruguay Japan US Latvia * * Venezuela Lithuania Vietnam * * TOTAL: 54 countries, GS1 XML: 34, UN/CEFACT Profiles: 10, EANCOM : 46 * Only non-gs1 standards implemented Table 2: List of countries where ecom standards were reported as not used: Azerbaijan Korea South Moldova Bahrain Kuwait Nigeria Cyprus Kyrgyzstan Pakistan Ivory Coast Libya Panama Jordan Malta Saudi Arabia Kenya Mauritius Tajikistan All contents copyright GS

6 The chart below illustrates the types of ecom standards implemented in 54 GS1 member countries where some form of ecom is being used. Figure 1: Types of ecom standards implemented in GS1 member countries All contents copyright GS

7 3. EANCOM 3.1 Number of EANCOM and implemented versions In year 2014, the implementation of EANCOM standards was reported by 44 countries. EANCOM versions 97 and 2002 are implemented in almost the same number of countries 30 each. Version 94 is still in use in 12 countries. If counted in terms of user companies, the EANCOM 97 is by far the most used one. The number of users of specific versions is included in the Table 3 below. Table 3: List of countries where EANCOM is used: Country EANCOM Users Dec 2014 Est Implemented Versions of EANCOM # of users # of users # of users Argentina Australia Austria Belarus Belgium & Luxembourg Bolivia 2 40 Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Canada Chile 6 10 Costa Rica Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Primary version Finland France Germany Greece n/a n/a Hong Kong Hungary Ireland Italy Japan n/a n/a Lithuania Macedonia Malaysia n/a n/a Mexico Netherlands New Zealand n/a n/a Nicaragua Norway Poland Russia Serbia All contents copyright GS

8 Slovakia Slovenia 900 South Africa Spain Sweden 5 n/a n/a Decreasing A lot of implementation Increasing use s. Switzerland UK Most commonly used version except for DESADV Mainly used for DESADV Ukraine Uruguay US Venezuela n/a n/a TOTAL 96, , countries 31 countries 33 countries Note: "" means that no information about the number of users, even estimated, is available to this Member Organisation, although the version is known to have been used. Note: More information about GS1 EANCOM can be found at the GS1 website or from the local GS1 Member Organisation. All contents copyright GS

9 3.2 EANCOM message implementations A total of 46 EANCOM messages have been reported as implemented, the most popular being ORDERS (Order), DESADV (Despatch Advice), INVOIC (Invoice), PRICAT (Price/Sales Catalogue), ORDRSP (Order Response), INVRPT (Inventory Report) and RECADV (Receiving Advice). This order is very similar to previous years. Table 4 below contains the details of messages used. Table 4: List of EANCOM message implementation per country Country Master Data PARTIN PRICAT PRODAT PROINQ REQOTE Pre Order QUOTES CNTCND ORDCHG ORDERS Order Transport & Delivery Payment Report & Planning ORDRSP OSTENQ OSTRPT HANMOV INSDES IFTMBF IFTMBC IFTMIN IFCSUM IFTSTA IFTMAN DESADV RECADV RETANN RETINS INVOIC TAXCON REMADV COMDIS COACSU PAMUL APERAK BANSTA CREMUL CONTRL DELFOR DEBMUL DIRDEB FINCAN FINSTA INVRPT MSCONS QALIT SLSFCT SLSRPT CONDRA PADUC Other GENRAL AUTACK KEMAN # by country Argentina 7 Australia 13 Austria 31 Belarus 17 Belgium & Lux. 18 Bolivia 3 Bosnia & Herz. 1 Brazil 15 Bulgaria 4 Canada 4 Chile 3 Costa Rica 6 Croatia 1 Czech Republic 15 Denmark 25 Finland 22 France 20 Germany 28 Greece 10 Hong Kong 7 Hungary 12 All contents copyright GS

10 Country Master Data PARTIN PRICAT PRODAT PROINQ REQOTE Pre Order QUOTES CNTCND ORDCHG Order Transport & Delivery Payment Report & Planning ORDERS ORDRSP OSTENQ OSTRPT HANMOV INSDES IFTMBF IFTMBC IFTMIN IFCSUM IFTSTA IFTMAN DESADV RECADV RETANN RETINS INVOIC TAXCON REMADV COMDIS COACSU PAMUL APERAK BANSTA CREMUL CONTRL DELFOR DEBMUL DIRDEB FINCAN FINSTA INVRPT MSCONS QALIT SLSFCT SLSRPT Other CONDRA PADUC GENRAL AUTACK KEMAN # by country Ireland 4 Italy 8 Lithuania 9 Macedonia 5 Mexico 17 Netherlands 15 New Zealand 3 Nicaragua 3 Norway 8 Poland 4 Russia 25 Serbia 8 Slovakia 21 Slovenia 18 South Africa 43 Spain 19 Sweden 16 Switzerland 15 UK 11 Ukraine 23 Uruguay 2 US 4 Venezuela 1 TOTAL All contents copyright GS

11 4. GS1 XML 4.1 Number of GS1 XML and implemented versions In 2014, the implementation of GS1 XML standards was reported by 32 countries. The most widely used version of GS1 XML standards was 2.8, and the two latest ecom releases 3.0 and 3.1 these were implemented in more countries than the other ones. Table 5: List of countries where the GS1 XML standards are used: Note: "" means that no information about the number of users, even estimated, is available to this Member Organisation, although the version is known to have been used. COUNTR 2014 Est X 2.0.X 2.1.X Argentina Australia Austria Belarus Belgium & Luxembourg Bosnia and Herzegovina Canada Croatia Denmark France Germany Greece n/a n/a Ireland Italy Lithuania Macedonia Malaysia n/a n/a Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway n/a 60 2 Paraguay Philippines n/a n/a Serbia 5 10 Singapore 600 n/a Slovenia 80 n/a South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland n/a n/a Turkey n/a n/a UK Ukraine 3 6 US TOTAL Note: "" means that no information about the number of users, even estimated, is available to this Member Organisation, although the version is known to have been used. All contents copyright GS

12 4.2 GS1 XML message implementations The details of the implementation of particular messages are presented in Tables 6 and 7 on the following pages. Last year, the most widely implemented GS1 XML messages were Order, Invoice, Despatch Advice and Catalogue Item Synchronisation, similar to the previous years. Note: The table lists official GS1 XML message names. Visit GS1 website to find: More information about GS1 XML Definitions of messages and their components and information about GS1 XML design Download message packets Or contact the local GS1 Member Organisation. All contents copyright GS

13 Table 6: List of GS1 XML ecom message implementations per country Order Deliver Transport Management Warehousing Pay Plan Other Country Order Order Response Consumption Report Despatch Advice Despatch Advice - Meat Product Extension Inventory Report Receiving Advice Transport Capacity Booking &Response Transport Instruction &Response Transport Status Request &Notification Transport Pick-up Drop-off Request &Conf. Warehousing Inbound Instruction Warehousing Inbound Notification Argentina 4 Australia 12 Austria 1 Belarus 10 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 Canada 1 Denmark 6 France 7 Germany 13 Greece 2 Ireland 4 Italy 4 Lithuania 4 Macedonia 3 Mexico 6 Warehousing Outbound Instruction Warehousing Outbound Notification Warehousing Operations Instruction Warehousing Operations Notification Logistics Inventory Report Request Logistics Inventory Report Advanced Remittance Notification Debit or Credit Advice Invoice Settlement Goods Requirements Goods Requirements Response Purchase Conditions Replenishment Proposal Replenishment Request Application Receipt Acknowledgement Product Recall Item Data Notification # of messages by country All contents copyright GS

14 Order Deliver Transport Management Warehousing Pay Plan Other Country Order Order Response Consumption Report Despatch Advice Despatch Advice - Meat Product Extension Inventory Report Receiving Advice Transport Capacity Booking &Response Transport Instruction &Response Transport Status Request &Notification Transport Pick-up Drop-off Request &Conf. Warehousing Inbound Instruction Warehousing Inbound Notification Netherlands 21 New Zealand 4 Norway 6 Paraguay 3 Serbia 2 Singapore 5 Slovenia 6 South Africa 25 Spain 5 Turkey 1 UK 5 Ukraine 7 Total Warehousing Outbound Instruction Warehousing Outbound Notification Warehousing Operations Instruction Warehousing Operations Notification Logistics Inventory Report Request Logistics Inventory Report Advanced Remittance Notification Debit or Credit Advice Invoice Settlement Goods Requirements Goods Requirements Response Purchase Conditions Replenishment Proposal Replenishment Request Application Receipt Acknowledgement Product Recall Item Data Notification # of messages by country All contents copyright GS

15 Table 7: List of GS1 XML GDSN message implementations per country Country Catalogue Item Synchronisation Basic Party Synchronisation Item Authorisation GDSN Price Synchronisation GDSN Trade Item Extension: Apparel and Home Fashion Extension: Audio Visual Photography Extension: BarCode Candidate Attributes Extension: : Chemical Ingredients Extension: : Entertainment Electronic Games GDSN Australia 5 Austria 2 Belarus 8 Canada 2 Croatia 2 Denmark 7 France 11 Germany 10 Greece 5 Ireland 2 Italy 6 Macedonia 1 Mexico 4 Netherlands 5 New Zealand 7 Norway 4 Slovenia 5 South Africa 8 Spain 9 Sweden 5 Turkey 4 UK 3 US 12 Total Extension: Entertainment Movie Publications Extension: Entertainment Music Recordings Extension: FMCG Extension: Food & Beverage Extension: Hardlines Extension: Healthcare Extension: Non-GTIN Logistic Units Extension: Promotional Trade Item Extension: Plumbing and HVAC Extension: Regulatory Compliance Extension: Specific Technical Characteristics Extension: Trade Item Hazardous Materials US # of messages by country All contents copyright GS

16 5. GS1 profiles of the UN/CEFACT XML messages GS1 has developed subsets (profiles) of four UN/CEFACT XML messages: Cross Industry Order Cross Industry Order Response Cross Industry Despatch Advice Cross Industry Invoice Seven MOs reported that these profiles either have been implemented in their countries or such implementation is being considered. Known implementations are only in two countries. The results are presented in Table 8 below. Table 8: Implementation of GS1 profiles of UN/CEFACT XML COUNTR Cross Industry Order Cross Industry Order Response Cross Industry Despatch Advice Cross Industry Invoice Croatia* Finland* Germany Lithuania* Malaysia* South Africa* Sweden TOTAL * Under consideration by government sectors, offered by service providers or guidelines created by MOs. Not yet actually implemented. All contents copyright GS

17 6. Use of Invoice ecom messages: EANCOM and GS1 XML In the current ecom Survey we asked how the Invoice messages are used: only locally (also if the goods are imported / exported, but the invoice is sent locally) or locally and cross-border. Results presented in Table 9 below show, that most of the GS1 XML Invoice messages are used only on local market, while GS1 EANCOM INVOICE messages are used mostly locally and in cross-border exchange. Table 9: Use of ecom Invoice messages: COUNTR GS1 XML Invoice Only locally Locally and cross-border GS1 EANCOM INVOIC Only locally Locally and cross-border Argentina Australia Belarus Belgium & Luxembourg Brazil Bulgaria Chile Czech Republic Denmark Finland France Germany Hong Kong Hungary Ireland Italy Lithuania Macedonia Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Paraguay Poland Russia Serbia Singapore Slovenia South Africa Spain Sweden UK Ukraine US TOTAL All contents copyright GS

18 7. Web EDI The Web EDI involves the exchange of electronic documents via an internet enabled platform. The business messages are available to the users as web forms that can either be filled-in manually or in automated way. The message is then converted by the translation application into the suitable ecom standard and transferred to the other user company. GS1 does not provide separate guidelines for the WEB EDI, but some GS1 MO do provide local guides. Table 10: List of countries where Web EDI is used: COUNTR 2014 Est COUNTR 2014 Est Argentina Macedonia 1 5 Australia n/a n/a Malaysia n/a n/a Austria Mexico Belarus Netherlands Belgium & Luxembourg New Zealand n/a n/a Bolivia 2 40 Nicaragua 2 2 Brazil Norway Bulgaria Paraguay Canada 6 4 Poland Chile Russia Costa Rica Serbia Croatia Singapore 600 Czech Republic Slovakia Denmark Slovenia 160 Finland South Africa France Spain Germany Sweden n/a n/a Greece n/a n/a Switzerland n/a n/a Hong Kong Tunisia Hungary UK n/a n/a Ireland Ukraine Italy Uruguay Japan n/a n/a US n/a n/a Latvia Venezuela n/a n/a Lithuania Vietnam n/a n/a Total In 2014: 102,635 in 50 countries, estimated for 2015: Note: "n/a" means that no information about the number of users, even estimated, is available to this Member Organisation, although the Web EDI solutions are known to have been used. All contents copyright GS

19 8. Non GS1 ecom standards and solutions Non-GS1 ecom standards have been implemented in 39 countries. The most widely used ones are: UBL and various local standards (including ANSI X12). These results are very similar to previous years, although it is often stressed that the implementation of UBL is growing. The details can be found in Table 11 below. Table 11: List of non GS1 ecom standards used in GS1 member countries: Country Standard # of users 2014 Est Australia ANSI X RosettaNet n/a n/a Proprietary XML standards n/a n/a Austria UN/EDIFACT n/a n/a ebinterface n/a n/a Odette/VDA n/a n/a Belgium & Luxembourg Bilaterally agreed flat files n/a n/a Bilaterally agreed XML n/a n/a Brazil CNAB/FEBRABAN RND NFe (Government) 1,139,000 1,055,000 Bulgaria Details not available n/a n/a Canada ANSI X12 n/a n/a Chile EDICL IDOC 2 2 Proprietary XML standards Costa Rica Electronic Invoice n/a n/a Croatia OAGI 2 n/a UBL 2 n/a Denmark UBL 2.1 in the public sector (Invoice) 200, ,000 MEDCOM medical communication Finland Details not available n/a n/a France EDIFACT n/a n/a GENCOD n/a n/a Proprietary XML n/a n/a Germany OpenTrans n/a n/a BMEcat n/a n/a EDIFACT-subsets n/a n/a Greece Details not available n/a n/a Hong Kong Details not available n/a n/a India Proprietary XML Standards 100 n/a Ireland Tradacoms ANSI X Japan Ryutsu BMS Latvia Details not available Lithuania Details not available n/a n/a Malaysia Details not available n/a n/a Mexico ANSI X12 n/a n/a Mongolia n/a n/a n/a Netherlands EDIFACT 1 n/a All contents copyright GS

20 HL7 n/a n/a New Zealand Details not available n/a n/a Nicaragua Details not available n/a n/a Norway UN/Cefact transport messages e2b Invoices (XML) EHF XML (Order, Order response, Despatch Advice, Invoice). 15,000 18,000 Format developed and used for trade with the Government Poland Proprietary XML of EDI services providers Fortrass n/a n/a Russia FNS XML (Russian Tax Administration Standard) 1,900,000 2,000,000 ECR Russia XML 12,000 14,000 SAP idoc n/a n/a Serbia OAGIS 3 n/a Slovenia eslog, local XML deviation from EANCOM 20,000 50,000 Spain Facturae (Public Sector) n/a n/a CSL (Books) n/a n/a UBL n/a n/a Sweden Proprietary XML (Nordic ebuilding, Swedish ebuild) n/a n/a UBL n/a n/a ODETTE n/a n/a Turkey Details not available n/a n/a UK TRADACOMS n/a n/a EDIFACT n/a n/a Ukraine Customs, Finance, Tax, Transport n/a n/a Uruguay Electronic Invoicing US ANSI X12 14,000 14,200 Vietnam Details not available n/a n/a Total countries: 39 3,204,674 3,204,674 Note: "n/a" means that no information about the number of users, even estimated, is available to this Member Organisation, although the standard is known to have been used. All contents copyright GS

21 9. Communication methods used to exchange ecom messages The most popular communication channel used to send the ecom messages is AS2, followed by Value Added Networks and Web Services. This result is similar to in previous years, but it is clear than more and more companies use Internet to exchange ecom messages, hence the growing popularity of AS2 and web services. The details are presented in Table 12 below. Table 12: List of communication methods used to exchange ecom messages. COUNTR AS1 AS2 AS3 AS4 Web ebms VAN Other Services Argentina Australia Austria FTP Belarus Belgium & Luxembourg Bolivia SFTP, MAC (Module Automatic Communication) Bosnia and Herzegovina Brazil Bulgaria Canada 2 Chile Costa Rica Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Finland France SFTP Germany e.g. FTP Greece Hong Kong Hungary Ireland Italy Japan Jx Latvia Lithuania Macedonia Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Nicaragua Norway FTP and others Paraguay Poland Russia FTP, OFTP, SFTP, FTPS, X400, JMS Serbia FTP, SMTP Singapore Slovakia Slovenia SFTP, South Africa All contents copyright GS

22 Spain SMTP (S/MIME) Sweden OFTP is used by Odette users Tunisia UK FTP Ukraine Uruguay US Total All contents copyright GS

23 10. ecom implementation overview since 2005 and future trends The ecom implementation survey has been run for seven years now. Although a large part of data is based on estimation since absolute figures often are very difficult to obtain, these are made by people the most suitable for that: the GS1 Member Organisation staff members, having daily contact with their user community. Due to some inconsistencies in the responses received every year, the charts presented below the chart represent statistical approximation of the 9 year results. Thus, they should be considered only as a trend illustration, rather than absolute figures. Figure 3 illustrates the implementation of GS1 EANCOM, GS1 XML and Web EDI in last eight years, and the forecast for From the chart it is clear that GS1 EANCOM is far from being an old and obsolete technology. The number of users amongst GS1 member companies is now more than 100,000 companies and in 2015 it is forecasted to increase by further The details of the GS1 EANCOM implementation results are presented in Figure 4. The relatively new comparing to the classic EDI GS1 XML standard after a period of modest implementation levels during first years, is now exceeding companies. The details of the GS1 XML implementation results are presented in Figure 5. The Web EDI implementation is growing at even a greater rate, which indicates that also smaller companies and organisations are increasingly embracing ecom based information exchange. See figure 6. In general, the interest and actual adoption of the electronic form of business documents exchange is constantly growing, confirming the benefits the companies can get from this form of business integration. All contents copyright GS

24 Forecast Forecast ecom Standards in the GS1 Community 2014 GS1 ecom adoption Web EDI GS1 EANCOM GS1 XML Figure 3: Adoption of Com standards and forecast for GS1 EANCOM adoption Figure 4: Adoption of GS1 EANCOM and forecast for 2015 All contents copyright GS

25 Forecast Forecast ecom Standards in the GS1 Community GS1 XML adoption Figure 5: Adoption of GS1 XML and forecast for Web EDI adoption Figure 6: Adoption of Web EDI and forecast for 2015 All contents copyright GS

26 11. Sectors using ecom standards Since the previous survey we added a question about the ecom standards implemented in: Transport & Logistics, Healthcare and for Public Procurement Use of ecom standards in Transport and Logistics In Transport and Logistics sector we checked implementation of the GS1 ecom standards: GS1 EANCOM and GS1 XML, as well as and possible other standards. The results received from 34 countries are presented in Table 13 below. Table 13: Use of ecom standards in Transport and Logistics sector COUNTR EANCOM XML Other GS1 Austria GS1 Belarus GS1 Belgium & Luxembourg GS1 Brazil Proprietary Tivit GS1 Bulgaria GS1 Canada X12 GS1 Czech Republic GS1 Denmark GS1 Finland GS1 France GS1 Germany GS1 Hungary GS1 Italy GS1 Japan GS1 Latvia WEB XML GS1 Lithuania GS1 Malaysia GS1 Netherlands GS1 Norway Local profiles. mostly based on UN/CEFACT GS1 Poland Fortrass GS1 Serbia OAGIS GS1 Slovakia GS1 Slovenia GS1 South Africa GS1 Spain GS1 Sweden GS1 Switzerland GS1 Tunisia GS1 Turkey Requires analysis GS1 UK GS1 Ukraine proprietary solutions GS1 US X12 EDI GS1 Venezuela GS1 Vietnam We do not know exactly TOTAL All contents copyright GS

27 11.2 Use of ecom standards in Healthcare In Healthcare sector, we asked questions about the implementation of the GS1 ecom standards: GS1 EANCOM and GS1 XML, as well as HL7 widely used by Healthcare worldwide and possible other standards. The results received from 26 countries are presented in Table 14 below. Table 14: Use of ecom standards in Healthcare sector COUNTR EANCOM GS1 XML HL7 Other Australia Austria Belgium & Luxembourg Brazil Canada X12 Croatia Finland France Germany Hong Kong Ireland HL7 for Clinical Data only Japan Latvia WEB XML Netherlands Paraguay Poland internal standards of IT providers Slovenia national flat file exchange South Africa Spain facturae Sweden Some use of UBL for invoice. Switzerland CSV Turkey its own UK TRADACOMS and PEPPOL will be used Ukraine proprietary solutions US X12 EDI Vietnam We don't know exactly TOTAL All contents copyright GS

28 11.3 Use of ecom standards in Public Procurement In Public Procurement sector we checked implementation of the GS1 ecom standards: GS1 EANCOM and GS1 XML, as well as and possible other standards. The results received from 18 countries are presented in Table 13 below. Table 15: Use of ecom standards in Public Procurement sector COUNTR EANCOM XML Other Australia Austria Belarus Croatia France Germany Ireland Latvia WEB XML Lithuania UN XML Malaysia Mexico Norway local profile based on UBL South Africa Spain facturae Sweden Some use of UBL. Ukraine proprietary solutions US X12 EDI Venezuela TOTAL All contents copyright GS

29 Appendix List of ecom related projects and / or experiences This Appendix contains a list of projects and / or experiences that particular MOs would like to share with the GS1 Community. The MO employees interested in details of any of those projects should contact directly the respective Member Organisation and the user company employees can receive more details via their local MO. Country Belgium & Luxembourg Finland Ireland Singapore Slovenia UK Projects to share Harmonized Order to Cash messages for the Belgian Luxembourgish Fast Moving Consumer Goods sector - sunrise date 1/1/2016 European harmonized Receiving Advice - available as from 1/1/2015 GS1 Finland GLS project. Order-to-Cash solution for SMEs. Developments in Healthcare Care using GS1 XML 3.0. (Orders, Despatch Advice, Receiving Advice and Invoice. Developments in DI using Returns Announcement 1) Exploring pilot project led by SG Customs to deploy the use of GS1 XML messages involving retail segment. 2) Work with electronic retail chain on the use of GS1 XML for their supply portal. 3) Work with local government agency to explore used of GS1 XML messages for ecommerce retail segment. Brochure in Slovenian language only for paper less business. Available through GS1 Slovenia Large documentation (also in Slovenian language) for using GS1 XML 3.1 Invoice message in various types of invoices. Available through GS1 Slovenia. Our EDI Toolkit has been expanded to include the four main messages used in the O2C process - order/despatch advice/receipt advice/invoice All contents copyright GS