Environmental Impact Statement for the Washington Union Station Expansion Project
|
|
|
- Grant Perkins
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 11/04/2015 and available online at and on FDsys.gov P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Railroad Administration Environmental Impact Statement for the Washington Union Station Expansion Project AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to advise the public that FRA will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the potential impacts to the human and natural environment of the Washington Union Station Expansion Project (Project) proposed by the Union Station Redevelopment Corporation (USRC) in coordination with the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak). The Project includes expanding and modernizing the multimodal transportation facilities at Washington Union Station, while preserving the historically significant station building. FRA is preparing this EIS in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). FRA will evaluate reasonable alternatives for the proposed Project, including a No Action (No Build) Alternative. FRA is issuing this notice to solicit public and agency input into the scope of the EIS and to advise the public that outreach activities conducted by FRA, USRC, and its representatives will be considered in the preparation of the EIS. To ensure all significant issues are identified and considered, the public is invited to comment on the scope of the EIS, including the purpose and need, alternatives to be considered, impacts to be evaluated, and methodologies to be used in the evaluation.
2 DATES: FRA invites the public, governmental agencies, and all other interested parties to comment on the scope of the EIS. All such comments should be provided to FRA, via mail or , by January 4, 2016, to the addresses listed below. Comments may also be provided orally or in writing at the public scoping meeting for the Project, scheduled for December 7, 2015 in the Presidential Room at Union Station located at 50 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, Washington, DC The meeting will be an open-house format for discussions with the project team from 4:00 to 8:00 pm with two brief identical presentations; one at 4:30 pm and the second at 7:00 pm to provide a thorough project description. Information on the project and the scoping meeting is available on the FRA Website at ADDRESSES: Written comments on the scope of the EIS may be mailed or ed by January 4, 2016 to Michelle Fishburne, Office of Railroad Policy and Development, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, or [email protected]. The December 7, 2015 Public Scoping Meeting will be held in the Presidential Room at Union Station located at 50 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, Washington, DC FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Fishburne, Office of Railroad Policy and Development, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, [email protected]. Information and documents regarding the EIS process will also be made available through the FRA Website at SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Washington Union Station Expansion Project would expand and modernize Washington Union Station. The Project includes
3 reconstructing and relocating tracks, developing new concourse facilities, maintaining multi-modal transportation services, and improving and expanding infrastructure and other supporting facilities. The EIS will evaluate the potential environmental impacts of an expanded multi-modal transportation facility at Union Station. Environmental Review Process FRA as the lead federal agency will prepare the EIS in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts ), and the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts (64 FR 28545, May 26, 1999, and 78 FR 2713, Jan. 14, 2013). In addition to NEPA, the EIS will address other applicable statutes, regulations and executive orders, including the 1980 Clean Air Act Amendments, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, the Endangered Species Act, and Executive Order on Environmental Justice. Alternatives considered in the EIS may involve Columbus Circle and other properties adjacent to Washington Union Station. The EIS will provide the FRA, reviewing and cooperating agencies, and the public with information to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of Project alternatives, and to identify potential avoidance/mitigation measures as appropriate. The Project may affect historic properties and will be subject to the requirements of Section 106 of the NHPA (54 U.S.C ). In accordance with regulations issued by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (36 CFR part 800), FRA may
4 coordinate compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA with the preparation of the EIS, beginning with the identification of consulting parties through the scoping process, in a manner consistent with the standards set out in 36 CFR Project Background In 2012, Amtrak prepared a Union Station Master Plan in coordination with USRC and other stakeholders, including regional transportation agencies and a real estate development company, Akridge, who owns development rights above the rail terminal. Akridge purchased the right to develop above the Amtrak property between Union Station and K Street NE from the U.S. General Services Administration in In June 2011, the Akridge property was rezoned USN by the DC Zoning Commission, which allows for a three million square foot-plus mixed use development, referred to as Burnham Place, to be constructed on a concrete deck over the Amtrak rail terminal. The 2012 Master Plan addressed future rail capacity needs, including additional tracks, a new train shed, and passenger concourses, and it provided a concept envisioning improved rail services at Washington Union Station in coordination with the Burnham Place development. The Amtrak 2012 Master Plan is the starting point and framework for the 2 nd Century Plan for Washington Union Station being planned by USRC and Amtrak, in partnership with Akridge (collectively referred to as the Partners). The Partner s 2 nd Century Plan will serve to coordinate multiple near-term and long-term public and private projects at Washington Union Station as those projects are further developed and implemented.
5 USRC in coordination with Amtrak propose the Project to expand Washington Union Station, the main project within the 2 nd Century Plan. The Project is anticipated to require federal funding and approval. The EIS for the Project will address the reconstruction and expansion of the rail terminal (track and platforms), construction of new concourses, changed and improved access, and associated improvements to modernize the multi-modal services and facilities of the station. Purpose and Need Union Station is the second busiest station on the Northeast Corridor with its capacity expected to double, while the volume of non-railroad pedestrians through the station is expected to increase threefold, by The station supports upwards of 100,000 rail and transit passenger trips daily utilizing intercity rail, commuter rail and Metro rail, commuter, local and tour buses, taxis, private cars, rental cars, limousine services, bicycles, foot traffic and, in the near future, streetcar. As a rail station, the facilities are inadequate for current and future operations and cannot provide the rail capacity needed to meet the future demands for Amtrak Acela, future High Speed Rail, commuter rail, Metrorail, and other rail services. The existing Station does not provide adequate or efficient capacity, access, and connections for different transportation modes, such as taxi and car services, Metrorail, intercity bus, or rental cars and parking facilities. In addition, Washington Union Station is not integrated with its surrounding neighbors and land uses. The station limits movement and flow among neighborhoods and between neighborhoods and destinations. As the demographic profile of station users and visitors changes and grows to include diverse local populations and new residents in addition to commuters and long distance travelers, the transportation infrastructure, amenities, and
6 services at Washington Union Station need to be expanded to meet these multimodal demands. The purpose of the Project is to expand and modernize Washington Union Station as the National Capitol Region s principal intermodal transportation hub in order to provide a positive customer experience; support current and future rail service and operational needs; facilitate intermodal travel; sustain its economic viability and continued preservation; and enhance integration with the adjacent businesses, neighborhoods, and future development. Specific elements of this broad purpose include: increasing station capacity to accommodate growth in passenger traffic and railroad operations; achieving compliance with the 2006 U.S. Department of Transportation Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) Standards for Transportation Facilities providing connectivity among transportation modes; providing access to and among surrounding neighborhoods; and maintaining financial self-sufficiency of station maintenance and operations. The Project will protect and preserve the main historic station building, consistent with USRC s 2015 Historic Preservation Plan. Scoping and Public Involvement FRA encourages broad participation in the EIS process during scoping and review of the resulting environmental documents. Comments are invited from all interested agencies and the public to ensure the full range of issues related to the Project are addressed, reasonable alternatives are considered, and significant issues are identified. In particular, FRA is interested in identifying areas of environmental concern where there might be a potential for significant impacts.
7 Public agencies with jurisdiction are requested to advise FRA of the applicable permit and environmental review requirements of each agency, and the scope and content of the environmental information that is germane to the agency s statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed Project. Public agencies are requested to advise FRA if they anticipate taking a major action in connection with the proposed Project and if they wish to cooperate in the preparation of the EIS in accordance with 40 CFR The public scoping meeting described above is an important component of the scoping process for Federal environmental review. FRA seeks participation and input of interested Federal, State, and local agencies, Native American groups, and other concerned private organizations and individuals on the scope of the EIS. Opportunities for public participation in the EIS process will be announced through mailings, notices, advertisements, press releases, and the FRA website at Comments or questions concerning the Proposed Project and the scope of the EIS are invited from all interested parties and should be directed to the FRA at the address provided above. Issued in Washington, DC, on October 30, David Valenstein, Division Chief, Environment and Corridor Planning. [FR Doc Filed: 11/3/2015 8:45 am; Publication Date: 11/4/2015]
Florida Avenue Multimodal Transportation Study. June 19, 2013
Florida Avenue Multimodal Transportation Study June 19, 2013 Today s Agenda Team & project introduction Project Timeline What you said Tools we use Mapped data and what clues it can provide Highlights
Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 5, 2015
Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 5, 2015 PROJECT Curseen-Morris Processing and Distribution Center Parking Lot 900 Brentwood Avenue NE Washington, DC SUBMITTED BY United States
Chapter 9: Transportation
Chapter 9: Transportation What is this chapter about? The goals and policies in this chapter convey the City s intent to: Create a coordinated, efficient, and more affordable multimodal transportation
Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures
Examples of Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures The next step in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) process is to develop goals, objectives, and performance measures.
SCOPE OF WORK for High Speed Rail and Intercity Passenger Rail Program Federal Grant Application Development
Draft 06162009 SCOPE OF WORK for High Speed Rail and Intercity Passenger Rail Program Federal Grant Application Development The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) requires the services of
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Notice of Limitation on Claims against a Proposed Transportation Project
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 12/10/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-31111, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [4910-RY-P]
AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
5 AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT 5.1 AGENCY COORDINATION As part of the planning process for the Oregon Avenue Final EA, DDOT conducted an agency coordination program. This coordination included
EPA Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities Building Blocks
EPA Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities Technical Assistance Tool: Complete Streets Deerfield Beach, Florida February 16, 2012 To: CC: Amanda Martinez, City of Deerfield Beach Roger Millar,
Why NEC FUTURE? 457 MILES LONG 2,200 DAILY TRAINS 750,000 DAILY PASSENGERS. Study Partners. Key Needs
457 MILES LONG 2,200 DAILY TRAINS 750,000 DAILY PASSENGERS THE NEC IS THE BUSIEST RAIL CORRIDOR IN THE NATION, AND IS VITAL TO THE ECONOMY AND CITIES OF THE NORTHEAST. Why NEC FUTURE? The Northeast United
2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results
SURVEY BACKGROUND The 2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey was distributed in September in an effort to obtain feedback about the level of support for various priorities identified in the draft Comprehensive
Executive Summary. Does a Streetcar Make Sense in Anaheim
Does a Streetcar Make Sense in Anaheim Streetcar in Portland s Pearl District Anaheim s proposed streetcar compares well with national best practice in Portland, Seattle and Tampa where new streetcars
North Face. South Face. Figure 1.1-2 Science Park Station Exteriors. Pg 1-3 MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
North Face South Face MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Pg 1-3 Figure 1.1-2 Science Park Station Exteriors MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Pg 1-4 Figure 1.1-3 Science Park Station Platform
Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000
1 of 8 12/27/2013 8:21 AM U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 202-366-4000 MAP-21 - Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
Schenk-Atwood Neighborhood Business District Master Plan
Schenk-Atwood Neighborhood Business District Master Plan Prepared for the Schenk-Atwood Revitalization Association (SARA) and the City of Madison SCHREIBER/ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. BEST Real Estate Group,
Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project
Wilmington to Newark Commuter Rail Improvement Project The Delaware Transit Corporation (DTC), a subsidiary of the Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), is undertaking a rail capacity expansion
Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision
Downtown Tampa Transportation Vision Executive Summary August 1, 2006 Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization County Center, 18 th Floor Tampa, Florida 33602 813-272-5940 www.hillsboroughmpo.org
VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY
3 VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY The overall planning strategy for the Bank Street CDP is to ensure that future development is undertaken in a coordinated and planned approach, supported
Proposed Modification and Establishment of Restricted Areas; Townsend, GA
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/07/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-25542, and on FDsys.gov 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal
The Gateway Program and Hudson Tunnel Project
The Gateway Program and Hudson Tunnel Project Presented to: NJ State Senate Oversight Committee Stephen Gardner Executive Vice President NEC Business Development August 10, 2015 1 The Need for Gateway
Section ALTERNATIVES. 3. Alternatives
Section 3 ALTERNATIVES 3. Alternatives 3.0 Alternatives The Springfield Rail Improvements Project Build Alternatives would utilize different routes. The No Build Alternative includes the continuation of
Sustainable urban mobility: visions beyond Europe. Brest. Udo Mbeche, UN-Habitat
Sustainable urban mobility: visions beyond Europe 2 nd October 2013 Brest Udo Mbeche, UN-Habitat The Global Report for Human Settlements Published every two years under a UN General Assembly mandate. Aims
APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) 2009 Transportation Improvement Program Call for Projects APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES Los Angeles County Metropolitan
How To Plan A City Of Mason
Transportation Master Plan (TMP) for the City of Madison: Draft Scope of Work Briefing for Madison Area TPB/MPO June 6, 2012 TMP: Overview/Purpose Help Create Walkable, Bikeable, Livable City - Strengthen
30 Years of Smart Growth
30 Years of Smart Growth Arlington County s Experience with Transit Oriented Development in the Rosslyn-Ballston Metro Corridor A Presentation by the Arlington County Department of Community Planning,
Effect on structures. Uniform settlement - no concerns. Angular distortion - causes damage due to tensile strain
Effect on structures Uniform settlement - no concerns Angular distortion - causes damage due to tensile strain 1/500 - safe limit for no cracking of buildings 1/150 - potential structural damage 36 37
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination 2035. Attachment A
ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Final Long-Range Transportation Plan - Destination 2035 Attachment A DESTINATION 2035 DESTINATION 2035 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ATTACHMENT A Moving Toward a Greener Tomorrow
RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS
RPA 14/ATURA Surface Transportation Program (STP) APPLICATION FOR FUNDS Please provide the following information when applying to RPA 14/ATURA for Surface Transportation Program (STP) funding for projects
Light Rail Transit in Phoenix
4. Presentation and Discussion: Phoenix Light Rail Implementation Wulf Grote Planning and Development Director, Phoenix Valley Metro Light Rail Transit in Phoenix Broadway Citizen s Task Force February
Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study. Public Workshop #2. September 12 and 23, 2013
Near Westside Neighborhood and University Avenue Corridor Transportation Study Public Workshop #2 September 12 and 23, 2013 Presentation Outline: Brief Review of Study Scope, Background, and Current Conditions
VRE SYSTEM PLAN SUMMARY
VRE System Plan Summary January 2014 VRE SYSTEM PLAN SUMMARY VRE A Cost-Effective Contributor to Regional Mobility During the last decade, VRE has demonstrated its ability to accommodate a rapid and substantial
All questions in this survey were voluntary; all results are based on number of respondents who answered the relevant question.
Online Survey Results Sound Transit 3 Draft Priority Project List Introduction The primary public engagement method employed to solicit feedback on Sound Transit 3 Draft Priority Project List was an online
2009-3. The Preservation of Local Truck Routes: A Primary Connection between Commerce and the Regional Freight Network
2009-3 The Preservation of Local Truck Routes: A Primary Connection between Commerce and the Regional Freight Network July 2009 This Goods Movement Challenges and Opportunities Report was prepared jointly
Overview of Transportation Planning
Chapter 7: Transportation Overview of Transportation Planning Transportation planning deals with the movement of people and goods throughout a city or a region and is not limited to automobiles and streets
ATTACHMENT K 5310 ELIGIBLE COST
ATTACHMENT K 5310 ELIGIBLE COST Attachment K - Traditional 5310 Eligible Cost a. Rolling stock and related activities for Section 5310-funded vehicles (1) Acquisition of expansion or replacement buses
Questions and Answers about the Orange Bus/Rail Investment Plan
Why are transit improvements needed? Questions and Answers about the Orange Bus/Rail Investment Plan The Triangle Region is now home to 1.5 million people. The U.S. Census and the 2035 Joint Long Range
Virginia s Approach to Intercity Passenger Rail Development
Virginia s Approach to Intercity Passenger Rail Development Kevin B. Page Chief Operating Officer Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation June 14, 2013 www.drpt.virginia.gov High Speed Rail
01/31/13 ACHIEVING THE VISION FOR RESTON. Reston Master Plan Special Study Task Force
ACHIEVING THE VISION FOR RESTON Reston Master Plan Special Study Task Force The Reston Master Plan Special Study Task Force was appointed by Hunter Mill District Supervisor Catherine Hudgins to review
From the FTA 5310 Circular (C9070.1F): 1. ELIGIBLE CAPITAL EXPENSES. Funds for the Section 5310 program are available for capital expenses as defined
From the FTA 5310 Circular (C9070.1F): 1. ELIGIBLE CAPITAL EXPENSES. Funds for the Section 5310 program are available for capital expenses as defined in Section 5302(a)(1) to support the provision of transportation
Performance Goals and Objectives:
Online Briefing Winter 2011 2012 Purpose: The purpose of the Project is to examine and recommend ways of introducing higher passenger train speeds on the Empire Corridor and ways to improve reliability,
Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014
Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment April 22-23, 2014 Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment Through the Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment Tool developed by Global future development
The LYNX Transit Master Plan. METROPLAN Orlando Presentation
2030 Paw Print: The LYNX Transit Master Plan D b 2010 December 2010 METROPLAN Orlando Presentation Project Partners Project Overview 18 Corridors Bridge between 5 Year Service Plan and Long Range Transportation
From Mobility to Accessibility: Addressing the Barrier Effect of Railway Infrastructure in Urban South Africa
des s Publics From Mobility to Accessibility: Addressing the Barrier Effect of Railway Infrastructure in Urban South Africa Sisa Maboza Rail Planner Passenger Rail Agency of SA Contents des s Publics 1.
Alcohol and Drug Testing: Reporting Positive Results for Tramadol as a Controlled Substance. AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), DOT.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/07/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-16531, and on FDsys.gov 4910-06-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Lone Star Regional Rail Project - Update. Joseph Black Rail Director, Lone Star Rail District Joseph Lessard Planning Director, Knudson LP
Lone Star Regional Rail Project - Update Joseph Black Rail Director, Lone Star Rail District Joseph Lessard Planning Director, Knudson LP August 20, 2015 Lone Star Regional Rail Project - Update Presentation
Strategic Economic Development Assets: Infrastructure in the East Valley
: Infrastructure in the East Valley Presented by: February 2013 1 INFRASTRUCTURE Moving People, Goods and Services In today s global economy, success belongs to the well-connected, especially in the movement
Notice of Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Docket B13-01
Notice of Public Hearing Docket B13-01 PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 2013 FUNDS AUTHORIZED UNDER THE MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY ACT (MAP-21) AND THE PASSENGER RAIL INVESTMENT
Transit Technology Alternatives
Transit Technology Alternatives Fixed Guideway Systems (see http://www.apta.com/research/info/define/index.cfm) Heavy rail - HR Heavy Rail is a system that is totally separated from its surroundings and
INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN NOTIFICATION FORM / PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
INSTITUTIONAL MASTER PLAN NOTIFICATION FORM / PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER JUNE 7, 2013 SUBMITTED TO: BOSTON REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ONE CITY HALL SQUARE BOSTON, MA 02201
Layover Facility Alternatives Analysis
Layover Facility Alternatives Analysis March 2013 Version 0 Back of cover page March 2013 South Station Expansion Massachusetts Department of Transportation Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 1.1. Layover
Mayors Welcome Strong Surrey Votes Yes Coalition Support. Yes Vote Would Vastly Improve Transit and Transportation in Fast Growing City
Mayors Welcome Strong Surrey Votes Yes Coalition Support Yes Vote Would Vastly Improve Transit and Transportation in Fast Growing City February 11, 2015 Vancouver, BC The Mayors Council on Regional Transportation
SOUTHWEST-TO-NORTHEAST TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR STUDY
DOCUMENT REVIEW 3.20.2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 SOUTHWEST-TO-NORTHEAST TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR STUDY... 2 FORT WORTH PARK-AND-RIDE DEVELOPMENT STUDY... 4 JOHNSON COUNTY PASSENGER RAIL STUDY...
Request for Information
Request for Information Date of Issue: February 13, 2015 Responses Due: May 29, 2015 Overview Forest West Properties Inc. (FWP) is soliciting qualifications from qualified developers for the development
Passenger Rail Service
Passenger Rail Service Bill Sproule Michigan Tech University REES Module #5 - Transit, Commuter and Intercity Passenger Rail 1 Passenger Rail Service Intercity Passenger Rail trains that move passengers
SYSTEMWIDE REQUIREMENTS
SYSTEMWIDE REQUIREMENTS for the Peninsula Rail Program San Francisco to San Jose on the Caltrain Corridor Description of the Systemwide Context for the High Speed Train Project This document provides a
Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update
Lincoln Downtown Master Plan Update Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................... 1 Complete Streets Framework.................................... 3 Promenade Creating
Greyhound Lines, Inc. Title VI Program
Greyhound Lines, Inc. Title VI Program Greyhound Lines, Inc. Title VI Program Plan Statement Greyhound Lines, Inc. ( Greyhound ) operates intercity bus services throughout the continental United States.
MODE CHOICE MODELING FOR LONG-DISTANCE TRAVEL
Rolf Moeckel, Rhett Fussell, Rick Donnelly Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. MODE CHOICE MODELING FOR LONG-DISTANCE TRAVEL 15 January 2013 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington
Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey
Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey In its second meeting, the Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group expanded and refined the list of approaches/ideas
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 02/04/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-02101, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National
Mount Royal College Transit Service Plan
Mount Royal College Transit Service Plan Background In 2007 November response to Council Report C2007-78 West LRT Alignment, Budget and Project Delivery, Council directed the Administration to report back
Implementing Instructions - Sustainable Locations for Federal Facilities
Implementing Instructions - Sustainable Locations for Federal Facilities Page 1 Background On October 5, 2009, President Obama signed Executive Order (E.O.) 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental,
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) PROCEDURES FOR THE OKLAHOMA CITY URBANIZED AREA FUNDS October 2015 Background The Surface Transportation Program (STP) was originally established as Section 133 of
Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding
MPC 5.f Attachment 1 STP-U Eligibility Guidelines Page 1 of 5 Federal Guidelines for STP-U Funding SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (STP) ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES PERIOD AVAILABLE: FY + 3 Years FUND: Highway
Analysis of the Obama Administration s FY 2017 Budget Proposal for Transportation
Analysis of the Obama Administration s FY 2017 Budget Proposal for Transportation FY 2017 Budget Summary The Obama s Administration s proposed budget for FY 2017, which was submitted to Congress February
