1 Climate change and its impact on building water damage Ola Haug Xeni K. Dimakos Jofrid F. Vårdal Magne Aldrin Norwegian Computing Center P.O.Box 114, Blindern N-0314 OSLO address Abstract The insurance industry, like other parts of the financial sector, is vulnerable to climate change. Life as well as non-life products are affected, and knowledge of future loss levels is valuable. Risk and premium calculations may be updated accordingly, and dedicated losspreventive measures can be communicated to customers and regulators. We have established statistical claims models for the coherence between externally inflicted water damage to private buildings and selected meteorological variables. Based on such models and downscaled climate predictions from the Hadley centre HadAM3H climate model, the estimated loss level of a future scenario period ( ) is compared to that of a recent control period ( ). On a national scale, payments increase by 15% and 20% under two different CO 2 emissions scenarios, but there is substantial regional variability. Of the uncertainties inherently involved in such predictions, only the error due to model fit is quantifiable. Key words: Water damage, buildings, meteorological observations, climate model data, Generalized Linear Models, claims models, prediction.
2 Climate change and its impact on building water damage 1 1 Introduction Over the past few years climate change has fully been put on the agenda of various fields of the society. In particular, since IPCC released their 4th annual report on climate change and its consequences last year, discussions have become more acute. One major aspect of the public debate is whether effort should be put into force on the current indication of climate change or if one should rather wait and see due to the considerable uncertainty that encloses this area. As part of the financial sector, the insurance industry faces substantial challenges from possible climate change. This applies to life as well as non-life insurance. Non-life insurance companies like Gjensidige Forsikring situated in Norway are concerned about assets held by their customers. With such duties, they share a genuine interest in climate change and its impact on future loss levels. Based on improved insight into future threats, insurance companies may update their risk and premium calculations, and announce dedicated preventive measures to customers, building contractors and regulators. This paper reports on a study of water damage to private buildings. Based on daily claims data and contemporary historical weather data, claims models for the coherence between losses and relevant weather variables are derived. Combined with climate scenario data, these models provide estimates of future loss levels. We acknowledge Gjensidige Forsikring for their kind co-operation and for access to their claims database. 2 Data The data used in this study are insurance data and meteorological and hydrological data from each Norwegian mainland municipality, a total of 431 sets of multivariate time series.
3 Climate change and its impact on building water damage Insurance data Insurance claims and population data are available from Gjensidige Forsikring s own portfolio on private buildings for the period to (illustrated via the solid blue line of Figure 3). For a certain municipality, claims data constitute daily figures on the number of water claims and their corresponding total payment (index-linked). Population data are monthly and hold information on the number of policies. The claims data are frequency claims, i.e. rather small losses that occur often. They comprise externally inflicted water damage rising primarily from either precipitation, surface water, melting of snow, undermined drainage or blocked pipes. Damage to buildings due to major catastrophes like flood, storm, slide etc. are covered mainly through the Norwegian Natural Perils Pool (see Such losses are not part of our analysis. The Perils Pool is a compulsory regulation that mutually divides responsibilities among insurance companies operating in Norway. Claim frequencies and mean claim size over the model period are illustrated for selected municipalities through the thematic maps in Figure 1. Figure 1: Claim frequency (number of claims per 100 policies, left) and mean claim size (total payment divided by the total number of claims, right) for the model period Numbers are for each municipality.
4 Climate change and its impact on building water damage Meteorological and hydrological data Meteorological and hydrological data are naturally categorized into observation based data and climate model data. The former exists for the time period from to , and the latter for a control period and scenario period, ranging from to and from to , respectively. In Figure 3, the meteorological observations are shown in red, whereas the climate model data constitute solid green lines. Data from both categories are daily values of precipitation, temperature, runoff and snow water equivalent. The variables have been spatially interpolated and exist at municipality level. The interpolations are based on the most densely populated areas of a municipality only. Since these are the areas where losses will primarily occur, a desirable coherence between claims and weather data is obtained. The large geographical variation in mean annual precipitation is illustrated through the thematic map to the left in Figure 2. The right panel of the figure reveals countywise change in daily extreme precipitation to be expected from the control to the scenario period under the B2 emissions scenario. The change is expressed as the ratio of the empirical 99% quantiles of the set of all daily precipitation data for the two periods. Figure 2: Left: Mean annual precipitation (in mm) over the model period Numbers are for each municipality. Right: Change in precipitation from the control period to the scenario period under the B2 emissions scenario expressed as the ratio of 99% quantiles. Numbers are for each county.
5 Climate change and its impact on building water damage 4 The climate data are regionally downscaled and locally adjusted Hadley Institute HadAM3H global model runs under the CO 2 emissions scenarios A2 and B2. The scenario A2, which is the more CO 2 -intensive of the two, prescribes high population growth rate and rapid economic development, whereas B2 relies on environmental conservation and sustainable growth, economically as well as socially. Table 1 summarizes the weather observations and the HadAM3H model data variables (above the horizontal line). Also listed are further variables used for modelling the claims. These include weather related as well as non-weather related variables. Variable Description Unit R t Precipitation registered day t (mostly collected over day t 1) mm/day T t Mean temperature day t C avr t Drainage runoff day t mm/day swe2 t Snow water equivalent day t mm R t+1 Precipitation registered day t + 1 R t 5,t 1 (main period during day t) mm/day Mean precipitation registered over the days t 5, t 4,, t 1 mm/day t Running time measured as day number over the period z 1t z 1t = sin(2πt/365), seasonal component 1 - z 2t z 2t = cos(2πt/365), seasonal component 2 - z 3t z 3t = sin(4πt/365), seasonal component 3 - z 4t z 4t = cos(4πt/365), seasonal component 4 - Table 1: Weather variables directly available from observation data and climate model data (above the horizontal line). Further variables used for claims modelling are listed below the horizontal line. R t+1, the day t + 1 precipitation, is included since the measurement period for precipitation is 6 hours delayed compared with calendar time. That is, precipitation registered day t + 1 is the amount collected from 06 UTC day t to 06 UTC day t + 1.
6 Climate change and its impact on building water damage 5 R t 5,t 1 expresses accumulated precipitation and is meant to account for water saturation of ground and vegetation. This is possibly relevant for the claims level on day t. The trend term, t, and the seasonal variables, z 1t,..., z 4t, take care of effects for which we do not know explicit explanatory variables. For instance, for the trend term one such factor that is not linked to weather could be economic activity. 3 Analysis Figure 3 shows a flowchart that links the data referred in Section 2 to certain processing modules (blue boxes). Solid lines indicate original insurance or weather data, whereas processed data are drawn using dashed lines Control period Prediction period time Water damage, observed Water damage, predicted Prediction of losses Claims models Prediction of losses Calibration: Climate model data against observations Meteorological observations Climate model data, control period Climate model data, scenario period Calibrated climate model data, control period Calibrated climate model data, scenario period Figure 3: Flow diagram for data and processing modules.
7 Climate change and its impact on building water damage Claims models Statistical models that relate losses to weather conditions are worked out separately for the number of claims and for the claim severity. Both responses are modelled using Generalized Linear Models (GLM)(see e.g. Mc- Cullagh and Nelder (1989)), i.e. models of the form g(µ) = g(e(y )) = β 0 + p β i x i. (1) Here, Y is the response with µ = E(Y ), g( ) is the link function and x 1,..., x p are explanatory variables including the weather elements. The model coefficients β 1,..., β p are determined from the data through the model fit. The number of claims on day t, N t, is modelled through a quasibinomial model, i=1 N t quasib(a t, p t ) E(N t ) = A t p t (2) Var(N t ) = φ A t p t (1 p t ). Here, A t is the number of policies and p t the claims probability on day t. Inclusion of the dispersion parameter φ destroys the pure likelihood properties of the binomial model, but at the same time allows for increased variability as seen in the claims data. Daily claims data are fit through a logistic regression in the GLM (1), i.e. p t logit p t = log 1 p t p = β 0 + β i x it. (3) The use of a (quasi-)binomial distribution for N t ensures that the number of claims does not exceed the number of policies at a certain day. An alternative would be the more common Poisson model. This model, however, does not impose an upper limit on the number of claims, an attribute which is crucial when we later turn to prediction. The models are related, though, i=1
8 Climate change and its impact on building water damage 7 the Poisson model being a limiting model for the binomial model for A t large and p t small (Feller (1968)). Next, turning to claim severity, we let s tj denote the size of the j th claim on day t, j = 1,..., N t. We assume that s tj follows a Gamma distribution, s tj Gamma(ξ t, ν), (4) with parameters so that E(s tj ) = ξ t and Var(s tj ) = ξ 2 t /ν (McCullagh and Nelder (1989)). In our models, claim severity is measured by the daily mean claim size, N t S t = s tj /N t. (5) j=1 The assumption (4) implies that for a given number of claims, the average claim size on day t obeys S t N t Gamma(ξ t, νn t ) E(S t N t ) = ξ t (6) Var(S t N t ) = ξ 2 t /(νn t ). We apply a logarithmic link function to the expectation ξ t in the GLM and let p log ξ t = α 0 + α i x it (7) for explanatory variables x it, i = 1,..., p. In the process of fitting the model (7), the number of claims is used as a weight so that mean claim severities based on several claims count for more than claim size averages based on fewer claims. Once models are established for the number of claims and their mean size, the expected total payment on day t is expressed through i=1 N t E( s tj ) = E(N t S t ) j=1 = E(N t )E(S t N t ) (8) = A t p t ξ t.
9 Climate change and its impact on building water damage Model fitting Prior to GLM model fitting, reasonable parametric forms for the explanatory variables are spotted from fitting Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) (see Hastie and Tibshirani (1990)). In such a framework the coefficient terms β i x i in equation (1) are replaced by smooth functions f i (x i ) of the explanatory variables. From subjective inspection of GAM plots, a selection of the most appropriate function alternatives are combined into candidate GLMs. Gjensidige Forsikring wants high-resolution claims models in order to identify vulnerability at municipality level. However, compared to the exposure, losses are rare and fitting separate claims models for each municipality is infeasible. Rather, claims models are fit on unified data sets that involve larger spatial areas (data records are still at municipality level). For the number of claims, models are fitted countywise. We keep some spatial structure in that the β 0 constant term of (3) is split into a mean county level term β 0 and a correction term δ k for every municipality k in the current county. δ k is positive- or negative-valued and satisfies k δ k = 0. The remaining coefficients β i are common to all municipalities in the same county. Claim severity data are more sparse as days with zero claims are uninformative. In order to obtain reasonable model fits, the spatial entity has to be enlarged beyond counties as are used for the number of claims. Gjensidige Forsikring divides Norway into five geographical regions, each comprising from two up to five counties. Similar to what is done for the number of claims models, claim severity models are fit separately to those regions. The constant α 0 of Equation (7) is split into a region component α 0 and an adjustment term γ F (k) that is identical for each municipality k inside county F (k) in the current region. Model selction is made by means of the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) originally described by Schwarz (1978). We sum BIC measures over all the spatial entities for which the models are fitted (i.e. counties for the number of claims, and regions for the claim size). The final models for p kt
10 Climate change and its impact on building water damage 9 and ξ kt are given by and respectively. logit p kt = β 0 + δ k + β 1 z 1t + β 2 z 2t + β 3 z 3t + β 4 z 4t + β 5 t + β 6 t 2 + β 7 t 3 (9) + β 8 R k(t+1) + β 9 R kt + β 10 T kt + β 11 T 2 kt + β 12 log(avr kt ) + β 13 swe2 kt log ξ kt = α 0 + γ F (k) + α 1 z 1t + α 2 z 2t + α 3 z 3t + α 4 z 4t + α 5 t + α 6 t 2 + α 7 t 3 (10) + α 8 R k(t+1) + α 9 R kt + α 10 avr kt, Essentially, the BIC criterion suggests leaving out variables that do not explain sufficiently the response of the model. For instance, precipitation typically has a positive effect (significant and with little uncertainty) on the claim level, while the effect for other weather variables is often more unclear. However, even if a variable has a non-significant effect, one can not deduce it is not important. The lack of effect is most likely due to considerable estimation uncertainty rather than the effect being zero with tiny confidence bands. 3.3 Prediction Expected losses for specific weather conditions may be predicted from the claims models (9) and (10) by inserting corresponding values for the meteorological variables. Consequently, using future climate data from the HadAM3H model described in Section 2.2, future loss expectations may be quantified, see Figure 3. The same exercise may be performed on climate model data from the control period. Finally, the expected loss levels of the two periods may be compared and possible shifts identified. Predictions of future insurance losses is for sure associated with uncertainty. First, of course, there is the uncertainty inherent in the climate model data
11 Climate change and its impact on building water damage 10 at hand. This error is not stated, but there are studies that suggest that it can be considerable, in particular at local scales (see e.g. Stainforth et al. (2007)). Second, there is an error present due to model specification. Our claims models certainly deviate from the true model for the phenomenon under study. Leaving out non-significant variables as discussed above is part of this error. However, as the true model is unknown, this error is left unattended. A third source of error is introduced from fitting the selected claims models. The coefficients are estimated up to some precision as told by the data. This estimation uncertainty is the only uncertainty that can be quantified. In view of these aspects, our results should be interpreted as guidelines of what could happen in the future, with rough margins in either direction. Loss level predictions for the scenario period are compared with predictions made from climate model data in the control period. For every day in each of the periods, predictions for the number of claims ( N t ), the mean claim size ( St ) and the total payment (Ût) are derived from Equations (2), (6) and (8), giving N t = A t p t, (11) S t = ξ t, (12) Û t = A t p t ξt. (13) Rather than focussing loss levels as such, we consider the change from the control to the scenario period stated as ratios. For instance, for the number of claims in municipality k, we fix the number of policies (= A 0 ) and consider t scn r k (scn, ctr) = pscn kt A kt = A 0 t ctr pctr kt A. (14) kt = A 0 Here, scn and ctr signify the scenario period and the control period, respectively. Since both periods consist of 30 years, the nominator and the denominator are of comparable size. Similarly, for the mean claim size we consider the total payment divided by the total number of claims throughout each of the periods. The ratio of the scenario to the control period reads r k (scn, ctr) = ( t scn ( t ctr ξ scn t ξ ctr t p scn t )/( t scn pscn t ) p ctr t )/( t ctr pctr t ). (15)
12 Climate change and its impact on building water damage 11 And for the expected total payment the ratio is simply the ratio of the sum of payments throughout each of the periods, r k (scn, ctr) = t scn pscn t t ctr pctr t ξ scn t ξ ctr t. (16) Ratios larger than one indicate an increased loss level in the future scenario period. County level figures are achieved from weighting the ratios in Equations (14), (15) and (16) by the number of policies in each municipality at the last day of the model fitting period. The climate model data we have used for prediction are massive and detailed output from a numerical model. They have not undergone any meteorological quality control. Some of these data contain spurious spikes that are probably not connected to climate change, but rather a consequence of numerical instabilities. In order to minimize the effect of such outliers, predicted loss levels have been truncated at their empirical 99.5% quantile. This is applied to the variable sets produced from Equations (11), (12) and (13) for both the control and scenario periods, before calculating ratios (14), (15) and (16). Point estimates of the predicted ratios in Equation (14) for the B2 emissions scenario are illustrated for some municipalities in the left panel of Figure 4. For reference, claim frequencies for the model period for the same municipalities are also included (right panel). The outcome for each municipality will be a funtion of the local vulnerability as told by the claims model, as well as the future climate as predicted by the emissions scenario under study. As is evident from the maps in Figure 4, among the municipalities with the lowest claim frequencies during the model period, there are municipalities whose claim frequency will stay low also in the future. In an opposite position are municipalities which have experienced high claim frequencies historically, and are still to expect a sizeable increase also in the future. In between, there are municipalities with low claim frequencies during the model period, that will gain noticeably more claims in the future. And also, we find municipalities that have faced high claim frequencies in the past, but will hardly have to fear any further growth. Figure 5 displays the change in number of claims from the control to the scenario period at county level as given by a weighted version of Equation (14). Only counties that contain the municipalities depicted in Figure 4 are given.
13 Climate change and its impact on building water damage 12 Figure 4: Left: Prediction point estimates of the change in number of claims from the control period to the scenario period under the B2 emissions scenario. Right: Claim frequency (number of claims per 100 policies) for the model period Numbers are for each municipality. Uncertainty intervals account for estimation uncertainty only and have been derived from assuming a multinormal distribution for the model coefficients. The intervals are formed from the 10% and 90% empirical quantiles of 100 model simulations. Akershus A2/ctr B2/ctr Buskerud Hordaland Norway Ratio Figure 5: Prediction of the change in the number of claims from the control to the scenario period. Point estimates and approximate 80% confidence intervals. A2/ctr signifies ratios for the A2 CO2 emissions scenario, while B2/ctr are B2 emissions scenario ratios.
14 Climate change and its impact on building water damage 13 4 Conclusions In this study we have established claims models that quantify the statistical coherence between water building damage and different aspects of the weather. The analysis is restricted to private houses, and losses due to extreme events like flood, storm surge or landslide are not included. The weather has been described through the variables precipitation, temperature, runoff and snow water equivalent. The claims models have been combined with climate model data for a historic control period and a future scenario period to infer historic and future loss levels. Results for two different CO 2 emissions scenarios have been worked out, and changes from the control period to the scenario period are presented as ratios. Our analysis shows that losses will increase under both emissions scenarios. Nationwide, the expected total payment increases by 20% and 15% under the scenarios B2 and A2, respectively. There is considerable geographic variability, however, as exemplified through a countywise range from 11% to 44% in the payments under the B2 emissions scenario. In general, coastal regions in the south-eastern part of Norway are more vulnerable than are counties in the western and middle parts of the country. Additional to estimation uncertainty, there is considerable unquantifiable uncertainty transferred to the loss predictions both from the climate model data and the model specification. It should be pointed out that the above figures are subject to a building mass as of the end of the model fitting period, both with respect to architectural tradition and location of the houses. The increasing focus on climate change is supposed to influence building practice, however, and thereby contribute in the direction of limiting the loss level enlargement. The relatively long period between the control and the scenario periods makes such adaptations possible. One should remember, though, that measures taken to reduce risks still induce costs, the major advantage compared to not adapting at all perhaps being the inconvenience of damages thus avoided by the policy holders.
15 Climate change and its impact on building water damage 14 References Feller, W. (1968). An introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, volume 1. New York: John Wiley, 3 edition. Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. J. (1990). Chapman & Hall. Generalized additive models. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, second edition. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2): Stainforth, D. A., Allen, M. R., Tredger, E. R., and Smith, L. A. (2007). Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 365:
www.nr.no Climate change - and its impact on building water damage Ola Haug Norsk Regnesentral ASTIN Colloquium, Manchester July 2008 This is joint work with: Xeni K. Dimakos Jofrid F. Vårdal Magne Aldrin
Introduction to Predictive Modeling Using GLMs Dan Tevet, FCAS, MAAA, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group Anand Khare, FCAS, MAAA, CPCU, Milliman 1 Antitrust Notice The Casualty Actuarial Society is committed
Session 43 Water Damage Risk and Canadian Property Insurance Pricing Jacqueline Friedland FCIA, FCAS, FSA, MAAA Adam Peleshok Questions to Answer Why are past water damage claims no longer predictive of
DRAFT: Statistical methodology to test for evidence of seasonal variation in rates of earthquakes in the Groningen field Restricted PRELIMINARY DRAFT: SR.15.xxxxx April 2015 Restricted PRELIMINARY DRAFT:
Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction Friday Forums CIA Water Damage Risk and Canadian Property Pricing Research Project January 17, 2014 Jacqueline Friedland FCIA, FCAS, FSA, MAAA Houston Cheng FCIA,
Nonnested model comparison of GLM and GAM count regression models for life insurance data Claudia Czado, Julia Pfettner, Susanne Gschlößl, Frank Schiller December 8, 2009 Abstract Pricing and product development
SAS Software to Fit the Generalized Linear Model Gordon Johnston, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC Abstract In recent years, the class of generalized linear models has gained popularity as a statistical modeling
Non-life insurance mathematics Nils F. Haavardsson, University of Oslo and DNB Skadeforsikring Overview Important issues Models treated Curriculum Duration (in lectures) What is driving the result of a
Analysis of pluvial flood damage based on data from insurance companies in the Netherlands M.H. Spekkers 1, J.A.E. ten Veldhuis 1, M. Kok 1 and F.H.L.R. Clemens 1 1 Delft University of Technology, Department
Multiple regression Introduction Multiple regression is a logical extension of the principles of simple linear regression to situations in which there are several predictor variables. For instance if we
1) Introduction Marketing Mix Modelling and Big Data P. M Cain Big data is generally defined in terms of the volume and variety of structured and unstructured information. Whereas structured data is stored
Helyette Geman c0.tex V - 0//0 :00 P.M. Page Hedging the Risk of an Energy Futures Portfolio Carol Alexander This chapter considers a hedging problem for a trader in futures on crude oil, heating oil and
Research methods - II 3 2. Simple Linear Regression Simple linear regression is a technique in parametric statistics that is commonly used for analyzing mean response of a variable Y which changes according
Estimating Potential Reduction Flood Benefits of Restored Wetlands Kenneth W. Potter University of Wisconsin Introduction Throughout the summer of 1993 a recurring question was the impact of wetland drainage
IDENTIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF AGE, PERIOD AND COHORT EFFECTS IN THE ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE ARCHIVAL DATA Stephen E. Fienberg, University of Minnesota William M. Mason, University of Michigan 1. INTRODUCTION
GLM I An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models CAS Ratemaking and Product Management Seminar March 2009 Presented by: Tanya D. Havlicek, Actuarial Assistant 0 ANTITRUST Notice The Casualty Actuarial
STATS8: Introduction to Biostatistics Data Exploration Babak Shahbaba Department of Statistics, UCI Introduction After clearly defining the scientific problem, selecting a set of representative members
Penalized Logistic Regression and Classification of Microarray Data Milan, May 2003 Anestis Antoniadis Laboratoire IMAG-LMC University Joseph Fourier Grenoble, France Penalized Logistic Regression andclassification
Combining information from different survey samples - a case study with data collected by world wide web and telephone Magne Aldrin Norwegian Computing Center P.O. Box 114 Blindern N-0314 Oslo Norway E-mail:
Foundation Engineering Prof. Mahendra Singh Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee Module - 03 Lecture - 09 Stability of Slopes Welcome back to the classes of on this Stability
MINITAB ASSISTANT WHITE PAPER This paper explains the research conducted by Minitab statisticians to develop the methods and data checks used in the Assistant in Minitab 17 Statistical Software. One-Way
Introduction to time series analysis Margherita Gerolimetto November 3, 2010 1 What is a time series? A time series is a collection of observations ordered following a parameter that for us is time. Examples
Catastrophe Bond Risk Modelling Dr. Paul Rockett Manager, Risk Markets 6 th December 2007 Bringing Science to the Art of Underwriting Agenda Natural Catastrophe Modelling Index Linked Securities Parametric
Using Excel to Solve Business Problems: Simple Predictive Analytics Curtis Seare Copyright: Vault Analytics July 2010 Contents Section I: Background Information Why use Predictive Analytics? How to use
Everything you need to build bespoke catastrophe models is HERE The Building Blocks Scientific and engineering expertise RiskInsightConnect Advanced tools for customizing model components WindfieldBuilder
The zero-adjusted Inverse Gaussian distribution as a model for insurance claims Gillian Heller 1, Mikis Stasinopoulos 2 and Bob Rigby 2 1 Dept of Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. email:
REDUCING UNCERTAINTY IN SOLAR ENERGY ESTIMATES Mitigating Energy Risk through On-Site Monitoring Marie Schnitzer, Vice President of Consulting Services Christopher Thuman, Senior Meteorologist Peter Johnson,
CEQ Draft Guidance for GHG Emissions and the Effects of Climate Change Committee on Natural Resources 13 May 2015 Testimony of John R. Christy University of Alabama in Huntsville. I am John R. Christy,
Integrated Resource Plan March 19, 2004 PREPARED FOR KAUA I ISLAND UTILITY COOPERATIVE LCG Consulting 4962 El Camino Real, Suite 112 Los Altos, CA 94022 650-962-9670 1 IRP 1 ELECTRIC LOAD FORECASTING 1.1
Technology Step-by-Step Using StatCrunch Section 1.3 Simple Random Sampling 1. Select Data, highlight Simulate Data, then highlight Discrete Uniform. 2. Fill in the following window with the appropriate
Index Section A. Planning, Budgeting and Forecasting Section A.2 Forecasting techniques... 1 EduPristine CMA - Part I Page 1 of 11 Section A. Planning, Budgeting and Forecasting Section A.2 Forecasting
Design and Analysis of Ecological Data Conceptual Foundations: Ec o lo g ic al Data 1. Purpose of data collection...................................................... 2 2. Samples and populations.......................................................
Application and results of automatic validation of sewer monitoring data M. van Bijnen 1,3 * and H. Korving 2,3 1 Gemeente Utrecht, P.O. Box 8375, 3503 RJ, Utrecht, The Netherlands 2 Witteveen+Bos Consulting
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS AGRICULTURAE ET SILVICULTURAE MENDELIANAE BRUNENSIS Volume 62 41 Number 2, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201462020383 GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS IN VEHICLE INSURANCE Silvie Kafková
1 Runoff of the Claims Reserving Uncertainty in Non-Life Insurance: A Case Study Mario V. Wüthrich Abstract: The market-consistent value of insurance liabilities consists of the best-estimate prediction
Flood damage survey after major flood in Norway 2013 cooperation between the insurance business and a government agency Hallvard Berg 1, Mia Ebeltoft 2 & Jørgen Nielsen 3 1 Norwegian Water Resources and
Innovations and Value Creation in Predictive Modeling David Cummings Vice President - Research ISO Innovative Analytics 1 Innovations and Value Creation in Predictive Modeling A look back at the past decade
The AIR Multiple Peril Crop Insurance (MPCI) Model For The U.S. According to the National Climatic Data Center, crop damage from widespread flooding or extreme drought was the primary driver of loss in
4. Simple regression QBUS6840 Predictive Analytics https://www.otexts.org/fpp/4 Outline The simple linear model Least squares estimation Forecasting with regression Non-linear functional forms Regression
Mathematics Fairfield Public Schools AP Statistics AP Statistics BOE Approved 04/08/2014 1 AP STATISTICS Critical Areas of Focus AP Statistics is a rigorous course that offers advanced students an opportunity
CCI-HYDR project (contract SD/CP/03A) for: Programme SSD «Science for a Sustainable Development» MANUAL, JANUARY 2009 CCI-HYDR Perturbation Tool A climate change tool for generating perturbed time series
Statistics in Retail Finance 1 Overview > So far we have focussed mainly on application scorecards. In this chapter we shall look at behavioural models. We shall cover the following topics:- Behavioural
REGIONAL CLIMATE AND DOWNSCALING Regional Climate Modelling at the Hungarian Meteorological Service ANDRÁS HORÁNYI (horanyi( horanyi.a@.email@example.com) Special thanks: : Gabriella Csima,, Péter Szabó, Gabriella
Stormwater Management in a Changing Climate: Current Initiatives at TRCA Ryan Ness Toronto and Region Conservation Authority A.D. Latornell Conservation Symposium November 21, 2008 TRCA Jurisdiction History
Methodology For Illinois Electric Customers and Sales Forecasts: 2016-2025 In December 2014, an electric rate case was finalized in MEC s Illinois service territory. As a result of the implementation of
ECONOMIC INJURY LEVEL (EIL) AND ECONOMIC THRESHOLD (ET) CONCEPTS IN PEST MANAGEMENT David G. Riley University of Georgia Tifton, Georgia, USA One of the fundamental concepts of integrated pest management
Models for Count Data With Overdispersion Germán Rodríguez November 6, 2013 Abstract This addendum to the WWS 509 notes covers extra-poisson variation and the negative binomial model, with brief appearances
136 Poisson Regression Analysis 13. Poisson Regression Analysis We have so far considered situations where the outcome variable is numeric and Normally distributed, or binary. In clinical work one often
ECONOMETRIC THEORY MODULE I Lecture - 1 Introduction to Econometrics Dr. Shalabh Department of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur 2 Econometrics deals with the measurement
APPENDIX A : 1998 Survey of Proprietary Risk Assessment Systems In its 1997 paper, the working party reported upon a survey of proprietary risk assessment systems designed for use by UK household insurers
Non-life insurance mathematics Nils F. Haavardsson, University of Oslo and DNB Skadeforsikring About the lecturer PhD in risk analysis, Institute for Mathematics, University of Oslo 11 years experience
CHAPTER 11: ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY 1. The revised estimate of the expected rate of return on the stock would be the old estimate plus the sum of the products of the unexpected change in each factor times
Survival Analysis of Left Truncated Income Protection Insurance Data [March 29, 2012] 1 Qing Liu 2 David Pitt 3 Yan Wang 4 Xueyuan Wu Abstract One of the main characteristics of Income Protection Insurance
The Geneva Papers, 2012, 37, (365 376) r 2012 The International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics 1018-5895/12 www.genevaassociation.org The Impact of Climate Change on Precipitation-related
Minitab Guide This packet contains: A Friendly Guide to Minitab An introduction to Minitab; including basic Minitab functions, how to create sets of data, and how to create and edit graphs of different
A Review of Cross Sectional Regression for Financial Data You should already know this material from previous study But I will offer a review, with a focus on issues which arise in finance 1 TYPES OF FINANCIAL
Urban run-off volumes dependency on rainfall measurement method - Scaling properties of precipitation within a 2x2 km radar pixel L. Pedersen 1 *, N. E. Jensen 2, M. R. Rasmussen 3 and M. G. Nicolajsen
Cross Validation techniques in R: A brief overview of some methods, packages, and functions for assessing prediction models. Dr. Jon Starkweather, Research and Statistical Support consultant This month
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF INTEREST RATE GUARANTEES IN LIFE INSURANCE J. DAVID CUMMINS, KRISTIAN R. MILTERSEN, AND SVEIN-ARNE PERSSON Abstract. Interest rate guarantees seem to be included in life insurance
Integrated Local Flood Management and Drainage Strategy OVERVIEW Flooding is a natural phenomenon. In urban areas where drainage relies on pipe networks, open channels and creeks, flooding can cause infrastructure
Institute of Actuaries of India Subject CT3 Probability and Mathematical Statistics For 2015 Examinations Aim The aim of the Probability and Mathematical Statistics subject is to provide a grounding in
Preliminary advances in Climate Risk Management in China Meteorological Administration Gao Ge Guayaquil,Ecuador, Oct.2011 Contents China Framework of Climate Service Experience in Climate/disaster risk
Sample Size and Power in Clinical Trials Version 1.0 May 011 1. Power of a Test. Factors affecting Power 3. Required Sample Size RELATED ISSUES 1. Effect Size. Test Statistics 3. Variation 4. Significance
CHAPTER 2 HYDRAULICS OF SEWERS SANITARY SEWERS The hydraulic design procedure for sewers requires: 1. Determination of Sewer System Type 2. Determination of Design Flow 3. Selection of Pipe Size 4. Determination
Analysis of Environmental Data Conceptual Foundations: En viro n m e n tal Data 1. Purpose of data collection...................................................... 2 2. Samples and populations.......................................................
Schools Value-added Information System Technical Manual Quality Assurance & School-based Support Division Education Bureau 2015 Contents Unit 1 Overview... 1 Unit 2 The Concept of VA... 2 Unit 3 Control
BayesX - Software for Bayesian Inference in Structured Additive Regression Thomas Kneib Faculty of Mathematics and Economics, University of Ulm Department of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
Vern Lindberg 1 Making Graphs A picture is worth a thousand words. Graphical presentation of data is a vital tool in the sciences and engineering. Good graphs convey a great deal of information and can
Predictive Modeling in Workers Compensation 2008 CAS Ratemaking Seminar Prepared by Louise Francis, FCAS, MAAA Francis Analytics and Actuarial Data Mining, Inc. www.data-mines.com Louise.firstname.lastname@example.org
Risk pricing for Australian Motor Insurance Dr Richard Brookes November 2012 Contents 1. Background Scope How many models? 2. Approach Data Variable filtering GLM Interactions Credibility overlay 3. Model
1 2 A very short description of the functional center network: regarding the Hydraulic and Hydrogeological risk, the national alert system is ensured by the National Civil Protection Department (DPCN),
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 2, Issue 12, December 2012 1 Artificial Neural Network and Non-Linear Regression: A Comparative Study Shraddha Srivastava 1, *, K.C.
Calculating Chapter 7 (Chatfield) Monika Turyna & Thomas Hrdina Department of Economics, University of Vienna Summer Term 2009 Terminology An interval forecast consists of an upper and a lower limit between
Software Metrics & Software Metrology Alain Abran Chapter 4 Quantification and Measurement are Not the Same! 1 Agenda This chapter covers: The difference between a number & an analysis model. The Measurement
Poisson Regression or Regression of (& Rates) Carolyn J. Anderson Department of Educational Psychology University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Generalized Linear Models Slide 1 of 51 Outline Outline
Bayesian prediction of disability insurance frequencies using economic indicators Catherine Donnelly Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK Mario V. Wüthrich ETH Zurich, RisLab, Department of Mathematics,
Matching Investment Strategies in General Insurance Is it Worth It? 34TH ANNUAL GIRO CONVENTION CELTIC MANOR RESORT, NEWPORT, WALES Aim of Presentation To answer a key question: What are the benefit of
IBM SPSS Forecasting 22 Note Before using this information and the product it supports, read the information in Notices on page 33. Product Information This edition applies to version 22, release 0, modification
IPCC workshop on extreme weather and climate events, 11-13 June 2002, Beijing. Estimation and attribution of changes in extreme weather and climate events Dr. David B. Stephenson Department of Meteorology