LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM
|
|
- Irma Atkinson
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 TITLE: Progress Monitoring Guidelines for Tier 2 and Tier 3 Literacy Intervention Programs in Grades 6/7-10 NUMBER: ISSUER: DATE: PURPOSE: MAJOR CHANGES: MEM-5289 Judy Elliott, Chief Academic Officer Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support October 15, 2010 The purpose of this Memorandum is to provide guidance to schools regarding instruction and assessment for Tier 2 and Tier 3 intervention classes in grades 6/7-10. This is a new memorandum. ROUTING Local District Superintendents Local District Administrators Instructional Services LD Directors LD Literacy Support Staff LD RtI Coordinators LD RtI Experts PreK-12 Counseling Coordinators School Site Administrators Bridge Coordinators Data Coordinators Intervention Coordinators Intervention Teachers Principals UTLA Chapter Chairs INFORMATION: I. BACKGROUND Within the multi-tiered framework for instruction that the LAUSD has adopted, data-based decision making and progress monitoring are key components in evaluating students response to instruction and intervention. According to the Reading/Language Arts Framework for California Public Schools, instruction and assessment are inextricably linked within any curriculum. Because they inform instruction, the following assessments are crucial to achieving the English- Language Arts Content Standards: baseline and benchmark assessments, progressmonitoring assessments, and end-of-year assessments. In a RtI 2 Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 ) framework, Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions increase time and intensity of instruction with more frequent progress monitoring. Close monitoring, data collection, and analysis allow for the timely adjustment of curriculum, instruction, and intervention, and ensure the integrity of implementation. II. DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING: ASSESSMENT ADMINISTRATION Within the LAUSD s multi-tiered framework for instruction, progress monitoring is an integral tool for informing instruction and data-based decision making. During the course of the school year, students will fluidly move between tiers as data indicates a need for more or less intensive intervention. MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
2 III. ASSESSMENT TYPES AND PURPOSES 1. Benchmark Assessments: Benchmark Assessments are administered three to four times a year, at the beginning, middle and end of the year or once per quarter. Benchmark assessments are determined by the particular course. In some cases (e.g., READ 180, LANGUAGE!) Benchmark Assessments are embedded in the curriculum. In other cases, Benchmark Assessments may be designed using the tools on the CoreK12 webpage. In Tier 2 classes, Benchmark Assessments include the Secondary Periodic Assessments in addition to assessments associated with the intervention curriculum. 2. Progress-Monitoring Assessments: Progress-Monitoring Assessments serve many purposes. They measure student progress toward focused, predetermined benchmarks and provide visual representation, in graphic form, of student progress towards those benchmarks. They also provide teachers with a comprehensive picture of each student s learning, which ensures a timely response to instruction and intervention when students understanding begins to break down. Teachers can take immediate and effective action to address each student s specific needs. Another important use for Progress-Monitoring Assessments is as a tool for reflection upon practice, upon the impact of instruction on student learning, and upon the effectiveness of instructional methods and materials in meeting student needs. Progress-Monitoring Assessments include multiple measures and focused assessments that measure student progress in a variety of ways (e.g., on select standards, through multiple modes, etc.). Teachers should administer these assessments at weekly or bi-weekly intervals to keep abreast of student needs. 3. Diagnostic Assessments: Diagnostic Assessments are used when a student s understanding begins to break down. These assessments are used as needed and do not follow a set pattern of administration. When progress-monitoring and classroom performance indicate that a student has begun struggling, teachers need to be able to diagnose the area and cause of his or her struggle. Rather than simply measuring a student s levels of success with given elements of content, Diagnostic Assessments are designed to target specific skills or concepts that students may lack. To access Tier 2 Benchmark, Progress-Monitoring and Diagnostic Assessments, log in to the LAUSD/CoreK12 website at: IV. Intervention Options Schools have multiple options when deciding how best to address Tier 2 and Tier 3 Intervention. Two options supported by the LAUSD are shown in Attachment A1. Whatever method a school chooses to use to provide intervention must include these three types of assessment, and all assessment data must be used to inform instruction. MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
3 Students in Tier 2 intervention must be programmed into a Core Language Arts class as well as an intervention elective. In addition to any assessments given as a part of intervention (e.g., MAZE Measures), these students are also instructed and assessed using the grade level Instructional Guides and the Secondary Periodic Assessments and Core K-12 Progress-Monitoring Assessments. Teachers should supplement these assessments with quizzes or assignments designed to assess students mastery of content at various points in the year. Structured intervention programs have their own program-specific assessments embedded in the curriculum. Both the Period Assessments and the MAZE Measures may be found on the LAUSD/CoreK12 website. For a description of the LAUSD Tier 2 and Tier 3 interventions, see the Intervention Course Overviews (Attachments A1). For guidance with assessments and assessment windows for particular intervention programs, see Attachments B1-D10 RELATED RESOURCES: ASSISTANCE: REF-5092 Placement Guidelines for Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions Programs in Grades 6-10, dated May 11, 2010 REF Implementing a Multi-Tiered Framework for Instruction, Intervention, and Support, dated March 25, 2010 BUL Multi-Tiered Framework for Instruction, Intervention, and Support, dated September 2, 2009 For further information, please contact Literacy/Language Arts Specialists: Catrisa Booker, Debra Conejo, Jaimi Krielaart, and Alison Pickering at ( MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
4 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Literacy Intervention Courses Overview - Secondary ATTACHMENT A1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Course Title Academic Literacy (Attachment B1) Basic Reading (Attachment C1) Developing Reading Skills Across the Curriculum (Attachment C1) Literacy for Success (Attachment D1- D10) Strategic Literacy (Attachment C1) Purpose Provides strategic instruction and intervention aligned to the grade level core English Language Arts (ELA) class; advances proficiency in reading, writing, listening, speaking and thinking as measured by the ELA California Standards Test and periodic assessments. Course is offered in grades Provides structured reading intervention for students who need vocabulary development, fluency, and comprehension skills. Curriculum used is often READ 180 in a single period configuration. Course is offered in grades Provides instruction in content access strategies and targeted intervention. Generally, this elective course is taught in the Learning Center. Curriculum used is often READ 180. Course is offered in grades Addresses the needs of students in grades 6-8 who have demonstrated delayed reading in the following areas: decoding, encoding, fluency and comprehension. Curriculum used is often LANGUAGE! within a 2-hour block. Addresses the needs of students in grades 9-10 who have delayed reading in the following areas: decoding, encoding fluency and comprehension. Curriculum used is often READ 180 within a 2- hour block. MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
5 ATTACHMENT B1 Assessment Guidelines: Academic Literacy (Grades 6-10) Curriculum Assessments Frequency Supports Core Instructional Guides Teacher Data Entry MAZE Measures Bi-weekly None Secondary Periodic Assessments (in core English classes) Assessment windows None Core K-12 Progress Monitoring Testing windows None MAZE Assessment Windows Assessment Window #1 Window #2 Window #3 Window #4 MAZE Measures 2 Times A Month (Bi-weekly) 2 Times A Month (Bi-weekly) 2 Times A Month (Bi-weekly) 2 Times A Month (Bi-weekly) MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
6 ATTACHMENT C1 Assessment Guidelines: Basic Reading (Grades 6-10) Assessment Guidelines: Developing Reading Skills Across the Curriculum (Grades 6-10) Assessment Guidelines: Strategic Literacy (Grades 9-10) Curriculum Assessments Frequency READ 180 Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) rskills Progress Monitoring Tests rskills Summative Tests Scholastic Reading Counts Quizzes Mini computer-based assessments in the Success Zone on: vocabulary, grammar, reading comprehension 4 times a year After every 2 rbook Workshops Administer mid-year and end-of-year Administer after a student finishes their independent reading book Weekly/Bi-weekly Teacher Data Entry uploaded into the Scholastic Achievement Manager (SAM) uploaded into SAM uploaded into SAM uploaded into SAM uploaded into SAM READ 180 Assessment Windows Assessment Window #1 Window #2 Window #3 Window #4 Scholastic Within the next 40 Within the next 40 Reading Within the first 5 Last 20 days of to 60 days of to 60 days of Inventory days of instruction second semester instruction instruction (SRI) MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
7 ATTACHMENT D1 Assessment Guidelines: Literacy for Success (Grades 6-8) Curriculum Assessments Frequency READ 180 Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) rskills Progress Monitoring Tests rskills Summative Tests Scholastic Reading Counts Quizzes Mini computer-based assessments in the Success Zone on: vocabulary, grammar, reading comprehension 4 times a year After every 2 rbook Workshops Administer mid-year and end-of-year Administer after a student finishes their independent reading book Weekly/Bi-weekly Teacher Data Entry uploaded into the Scholastic Achievement Manager (SAM) uploaded into SAM uploaded into SAM uploaded into SAM uploaded into SAM READ 180 Assessment Windows Assessment Window #1 Window #2 Window #3 Window #4 Scholastic Within the next 40 Within the next 40 Reading Within the first 5 Last 20 days of to 60 days of to 60 days of Inventory days of instruction second semester instruction instruction (SRI) MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
8 Assessment Guidelines: Literacy for Success (Grades 6-8) (cont d) ATTACHMENT D2 Curriculum Assessments Frequency LANGUAGE! 3 rd Edition LANGUAGE! 4 th Edition Degrees of Reading Power (DRP) Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency (TOSWRF) Spelling Inventory (SI) Tests Summative Assessment LANGUAGE! Reading Scale (LRS) Test of Silent Contextual Reading Fluency (TOSCRF) Test of Written Spelling (TWS) Tests End of Year Tests 3 times a year 3 times a year 3 times a year Weekly/Bi-weekly 2 times a year after the completion of a book 3 times a year 3 times a year 3 times a year Weekly/Bi-weekly 2 times a year after the completion of a book Teacher Data Entry MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
9 ATTACHMENT D3 LANGUAGE! 3 rd Edition Instruction and Assessment Windows Book A: LITERACY FOR SUCCESS 1A Instruction Timeline Assessments Scores Due Administer the placement assessments within the first Placement Assessments 5 days of instruction Placement Assessments Unit 1 Book A Unit 2 Book A Unit 3 Book A Unit 4 Book A Unit 5 Book A Unit 6 Book A Progress Indicators During Unit 6 Instruction Administer in Lessons 5 and 10 (days 5 and 10) Administer Book A Summative Test and Composition Sample Administer Progress Indicators no tests * - No later test *Summative Test No test *Progress Indicators No later than 4 days after tests MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
10 ATTACHMENT D4 LANGUAGE! 3 rd Edition Instruction and Assessment Windows Book B: LITERACY FOR SUCCESS 1B Instruction Timeline Assessments Scores Due Administer the placement assessments within the first Placement Assessments 5 days of instruction Placement Assessments Unit 7 Book B Unit 8 Book B Unit 9 Book B Unit 10 Book B Unit 11 Book B Unit 12 Book B Progress Indicators During Unit 12 Instruction Administer in Lessons 5 and 10 (days 5 and 10) Administer Book B Summative Test and Composition Sample Administer Progress Indicators no tests * - No later test *Summative Test No test Progress Indicators No later than 4 days after tests MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
11 ATTACHMENT D5 LANGUAGE! 3 rd Edition Instruction and Assessment Windows Book C: LITERACY FOR SUCCESS 2A Instruction Timeline Assessments Scores Due Administer the placement assessments within the first Placement Assessments 5 days of instruction Placement Assessments Unit 13 Book C Unit 14 Book C Unit 15 Book C Unit 16 Book C Unit 17 Book C Unit 18 Book C Progress Indicators Complete lessons 1-10 in Assess weekly/biweekly Complete lessons 1-10 in Assess weekly/biweekly Complete lessons 1-10 in Assess weekly/biweekly Complete lessons 1-10 in Assess weekly/biweekly Complete lessons 1-10 in Assess weekly/biweekly Complete lessons 1-10 in Assess weekly/biweekly During Unit 18 Instruction Administer in Lessons 5 and 10 (days 5 and 10) Administer Book C Summative Test and Composition Sample Administer Progress Indicators no tests * - No later test *Summative Test No test Progress Indicators No later than 4 days after tests MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
12 ATTACHMENT D6 LANGUAGE! 3 rd Edition Instruction and Assessment Windows Book D: LITERACY FOR SUCCESS 2B Instruction Timeline Assessments Scores Due Administer the placement assessments within the first Placement Assessments 5 days of instruction Placement Assessments Unit 19 Book D Unit 20 Book D Unit 21 Book D Unit 22 Book D Unit 23 Book D Unit 24 Book D Progress Indicators During Unit 24 Instruction Administer in Lessons 5 and 10 (days 5 and 10) Administer Book D Summative Test and Composition Sample Administer Progress Indicators no tests * - No later test *Summative Test No test Progress Indicators No later than 4 days after tests MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
13 ATTACHMENT D7 LANGUAGE! 4 th Edition Instruction and Assessment Windows Book A: LITERACY FOR SUCCESS 1A Instruction Timeline Assessments Scores Due Placement Administer the placement Assessments assessments within the first Placement Assessments than 4 days after (TOSCRF, LRS, (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) 5 days of instruction tests TWS, Writing) Unit 1 Book A than 2 days after Unit 2 Book A Mastery in Lessons 5, 8, and 10 (days 8, 11, Administer Benchmark Paper than 3 days after administering all of the assessments (Content Mastery and Benchmark Paper) Unit 3 Book A Unit 4 Book A Unit 5 Book A Unit 6 Book A Progress Indicators (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) During Unit 6 Instruction Mastery in Lessons 5, 8, and 10 (days 8, 11, Administer Benchmark Paper Mastery in Lessons 5 and 10 (days 8 and Administer End of Book (Book A) Administer Progress Indicators (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) than 2 days after than 3 days after administering all of the assessments (Content Mastery and Benchmark Paper) than 2 days after * - No later administering test *End of Book No test Progress Indicators No tests MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
14 ATTACHMENT D8 LANGUAGE! 4 th Edition Instruction and Assessment Windows Book B: LITERACY FOR SUCCESS 1B Instruction Timeline Assessments Scores Due Placement Assessments (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) Unit 7 Book B Unit 8 Book B Unit 9 Book B Unit 10 Book B Unit 11 Book B Unit 12 Book B Progress Indicators (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) Administer the placement assessments within the first 5 days of instruction During Unit 12 Instruction Placement Assessments (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) Administer in Lessons 5, 8, and 10 (days 8, 11, Administer Benchmark Paper Administer in Lessons 5 and 10 (days 8 and Administer End of Book (Book B) Administer Progress Indicators (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) than 4 days after tests Content Mastery Content Mastery Content Mastery than 3 days after administering all of the assessments (Content Mastery and Benchmark Paper) Content Mastery * - No later administering test *End of Book Content Mastery No later than 4 days after administering the test Progress Indicators No tests MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
15 ATTACHMENT D9 LANGUAGE! 4 th Edition Instruction and Assessment Windows Book C: LITERACY FOR SUCCESS 2A Instruction Timeline Assessments Scores Due Placement Assessments (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) Unit 13 Book C Unit 14 Book C Unit 15 Book C Unit 16 Book C Unit 17 Book C Unit 18 Book C Progress Indicators (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) Administer the placement assessments within the first 5 days of instruction During Unit 18 Instruction Placement Assessments (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) Mastery in Lessons 5, 8, and 10 (days 8, 11, Administer Benchmark Paper Mastery in Lessons 5, 8, and 10 (days 8, 11, Administer Benchmark Paper Mastery in Lessons 5 and 10 (days 8 and Administer End of Book (Book C) Administer Progress Indicators (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) than 4 days after tests than 2 days after than 3 days after administering all of the assessments (Content Mastery and Benchmark Paper) than 2 days after than 3 days after administering all of the assessments (Content Mastery and Benchmark Paper) than 2 days after * - No later than 2 days after test *End of Book No test Progress Indicators No later than 4 days after tests MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
16 ATTACHMENT D10 LANGUAGE! 4 th Edition Instruction and Assessment Windows Book D: LITERACY FOR SUCCESS 2B Instruction Timeline Assessments Scores Due Placement Assessments (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) Unit 19 Book D Unit 20 Book D Unit 21 Book D Unit 22 Book D Unit 23 Book D Unit 24 Book D Progress Indicators (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) Administer the placement assessments within the first 5 days of instruction During Unit 24 Instruction Placement Assessments (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) Administer in Lessons 5, 8, and 10 (days 8, 11 Mastery in Lessons 5, 8, and 10 (days 8, 11, Administer Benchmark Paper Administer in Lessons 5, 8, and 10 (days 8, 11 Mastery in Lessons 5, 8, and 10 (days 8, 11, Administer Benchmark Paper Administer in Lessons 5, 8, and 10 (days 8, 11 Mastery in Lessons 5 and 10 (days 8 and Administer End of Book (Book D) Administer Progress Indicators (TOSCRF, LRS, TWS, Writing) than 4 days after tests than 2 days after than 3 days after administering all of the assessments (Content Mastery and Benchmark Paper) than 2 days after than 3 days after administering all of the assessments (Content Mastery and Benchmark Paper) than 2 days after * - No later administering the test *End of Book No test Progress Indicators No tests MEM of 16 October 15, 2010
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Reference Guide
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Procedural Guidelines for Administering Periodic Assessments for Secondary Schools, Grades 6-12, for English/Language Arts, History/Social Science, Mathematics, and Science Judy
More informationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM
TITLE: NUMBER: MEM- 5738.3 ISSUER: Elementary Guidelines for Reading Assessment and Screening Procedures for Intensive (Tier 3) Instruction and Interventions at Grades 4, 5, and 6 (as applicable) Gerardo
More informationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENCE GUIDE
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Certification of Instructional Materials Sufficiency, Secondary Schools DATE: PURPOSE: MAJOR CHANGES: Judy Elliott, Chief Academic Officer Office of Curriculum, Instruction & Support
More informationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENCE GUIDE
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Placement of Matriculating English Learners in Middle School and High School ELD (ESL/SH English) Curriculum REF-55 DATE: June 3, 200 Mary Campbell, Administrator Language Acquisition
More informationSelecting and Exiting Students Read 180 Program Springfield School District
Selecting and Exiting Students Read 180 Program Springfield School District Introduction: The purpose of the following guidelines is to ensure that students most likely to benefit from Read 180 are selected
More informationDistrict 2854 Ada-Borup Public Schools. Reading Well By Third Grade Plan. For. Ada-Borup Public Schools. Drafted April 2012
District 2854 Ada-Borup Public Schools Reading Well By Third Grade Plan For Ada-Borup Public Schools Drafted April 2012 Literacy Team: Alayna Wagner- RTI Leader, Second Grade Teacher Jordan Johnson- RTI
More informationWappingers Central School District
Wappingers Central School District Response to Intervention Plan (RTI) February 2012 Tier III Tier II Tier I 1 Introduction to WCSD s 3 Tier RTI Model The 3 Tier Response to Intervention (RTI) Model provides
More informationNevis Public School District #308. District Literacy Plan Minnesota Statute 120B.12, 2011 2015-2016. Learning together... Achieving quality together.
Nevis Public School District #308 District Literacy Plan Minnesota Statute 120B.12, 2011 2015-2016 Learning together... Achieving quality together. SCHOOL BOARD Chairperson: Vice Chairperson: Treasurer:
More informationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENCE GUIDE
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Development and Implementation of a Learning Center at the Secondary Level DATE: October 22, 2007 Donnalyn Jaque-Antón, Associate Superintendent ROUTING Secondary Schools Local District
More informationHow To Write A Curriculum Framework For The Paterson Public School District
DEPARTMENT OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION FRAMEWORK PROLOGUE Paterson s Department of Curriculum and Instruction was recreated in 2005-2006 to align the preschool through grade 12 program and to standardize
More informationINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE LOS ANGELES UNFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT LOCAL DISTRICT EAST
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE LOS ANGELES UNFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT LOCAL DISTRICT EAST TO: Elementary Principals Date: 9/21/15 FROM: SUBJECT: David Baca, EdD, Administrator of Instruction 2015 2016 ELEMENTARY
More informationFoundation Paper Supporting Special Education Students with READ 180
Foundation Paper Supporting Special Education Students with READ 180 READ 180 is a scientifically research-based, intensive reading intervention program with a proven track record of delivering measurable
More informationPerformance Goal 1: All students will reach high standards, at a minimum, attaining proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by 2013-2014.
Performance Goal 1: All students will reach high standards, at a minimum, attaining proficiency or better in reading and mathematics by 2013-2014. Planned Improvement in Student Performance in Reading
More informationSecond Grade Core Knowledge Addendum
Sight Words Second Grade Core Knowledge Addendum Dolch Sight Words are naturally embedded in the Core Knowledge Program. They are taught throughout the program in a sequence of instruction, unlike previous
More informationREVERE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Theme 1 Student Learning/Curriculum and Instruction High expectations are at the heart of the vision for all students in the Revere Public Schools. By embracing the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks,
More informationI. School- Wide DL Components
AISD Guidelines for Implementation of the Gómez and Gómez Dual Language Enrichment Model These PK 5 guidelines are designed to promote fidelity in the implementation of the Gómez and Gómez Dual Language
More informationA COMPREHENSIVE K-3 READING ASSESSMENT PLAN. Guidance for School Leaders
A COMPREHENSIVE K-3 READING ASSESSMENT PLAN Guidance for School Leaders A COMPREHENSIVE K-3 READING ASSESSMENT PLAN Guidance for School Leaders Joseph K. Torgesen Center on Instruction Reading Strand
More informationSPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY
SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY 24:05:24.01:18. Specific learning disability defined. Specific learning disability is a disorder in one or more of the basic psychological processes involved in understanding
More informationUnderstanding Types of Assessment Within an RTI Framework
Understanding Types of Assessment Within an RTI Framework Slide 1: Welcome to the webinar Understanding Types of Assessment Within an RTI Framework. This is one of 11 webinars that we have developed at
More informationBasic Skills Teachers Intervention Specialists & Instructional Assistants Support Services Handbook 2013-2014 Audubon Public Schools
Basic Skills Teachers Intervention Specialists & Instructional Assistants Support Services Handbook 2013-2014 Audubon Public Schools Rationale A plan is in place for the 2013-14 school year to continue
More informationPlan for Continuous Improvement
Plan for Continuous Improvement School Name: BETTIE F WILLIAMS ELEMENTAR Y SCHOOL Date: 9/16/2014 Section II: Action Plan What outcomes do we want for our students? PLAN Student gfedcb Academic proficiency
More informationMCD OUTCOME COMPONENT SCHOOL PLAN
Federal Requirement, District publications and forms are available Search and Serve Response to Intervention (RtI) approach shall be one of several components of the process of determining a Specific Learning
More informationFirst Grade Core Knowledge Addendum
Sight Words First Grade Core Knowledge Addendum Dolch Sight Words are naturally embedded in the Core Knowledge Program. They are taught throughout the program in a sequence of instruction, unlike previous
More informationAssessment Support. This guide explores envisionmath Texas 2.0 assessment support.
Assessment Support Introduction This guide explores envisionmath Texas 2.0 assessment support. Placement Test It examines the variety of formal and informal assessments built into the program, explains
More informationUsing Direct Instruction Programs as Intervention Programs in Grades K 3
Using Direct Instruction Programs as Intervention Programs in Grades K 3 Direct Instruction News Volume 5, Number 2 Summer 2005 Introduction This article is about the use of Direct Instruction as an intervention
More informationCALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)
CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE) The Teaching Performance Expectations describe the set of knowledge, skills, and abilities that California expects of each candidate for a Multiple
More informationFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION DPS: 2013-56 DATE: November 21, 2013 Pam Stewart Commissioner of Education Technical Assistance Paper Third-Grade Student Progression Summary: The purpose of this Technical
More informationDRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION
DRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION TYPES OF ASSESSMENT & PURPOSES Assessment before learning = Pre-assessment We assess before learning ** Aimsweb, ISEL, Pretests Assessment
More informationOrange County Public Schools. State Accountability System September 2, 2014
State Accountability System September 2, 2014 Assessment and Accountability in Transition No major portion of Assessment and Accountability is going to stay constant for the 2014 15 school year In addition,
More informationIdentifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities. Part 1: Introduction/Laws & RtI in Relation to SLD Identification
Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities Part 1: Introduction/Laws & RtI in Relation to SLD Identification # Watch for a blue box in top right corner for page references from the Colorado
More informationInstructionally Appropriate IEPs. A Skills Based Approach to IEP Development Division of Special Populations
Instructionally Appropriate IEPs A Skills Based Approach to IEP Development Division of Special Populations Agenda Division of Special Populations Policy Changes Tier I Instruction Common Core State Standards
More informationReading Results with
Reading Results with Proven Effective Jamestown Reading Navigator is the first comprehensive reading intervention program designed exclusively for middle and high school students. The program addresses
More informationPrinciples of Data-Driven Instruction
Education in our times must try to find whatever there is in students that might yearn for completion, and to reconstruct the learning that would enable them autonomously to seek that completion. Allan
More informationHamilton Southeastern Schools
Hamilton Southeastern Schools Response to Instruction (RtI) Guide October 2013 Contents HSE Mission Statement. 3 Response to Instruction.. 3 Components of RtI....... 3 HSE Tiered Model........ 5 RtI Tiers
More informationProgram Models. proficiency and content skills. After school tutoring and summer school available
Holyoke English Language Learners Program Opportunities & Services Program Models ELL students ts participate i t in mixed groupings so they can learn with English-speaking peers. Certified ESL, ELL or
More informationTechnical Assistance Paper
Pam Stewart Commissioner of Education DPS: 2014-94 Date: August 1, 2014 Technical Assistance Paper What s Special about Special Education? Specially Designed Instruction for Students with Disabilities
More informationAdministering and Scoring of the Oral Reading Fluency and Maze Tests
Administering and Scoring of the Oral Reading Fluency and Maze Tests Path Driver for Reading uses two forms of curriculum-based measurements (CBMs) to monitor student reading development oral reading fluency
More informationThree Critical Success Factors for Reading Intervention and Effective Prevention
Three Critical Success Factors for Reading Intervention and Effective Prevention Elizabeth Brooke, Ph.D., CCC-SLP Vice President of Education and Research, Lexia Learning Strong fundamental literacy skills
More informationNext Generation Dashboard Guide
Next Generation Dashboard Guide For use with READ 180 Next Generation, System 44 Next Generation, FASTT Math Next Generation, iread, MATH 180, and Scholastic Achievement Manager (SAM) version 2.0.2 or
More informationREADING WITH. Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate
READING WITH PENNSYLVANIA READING SPECIALIST CERTIFICATE Reading with Pennsylvania Reading Specialist Certificate Program Coordinator: Ms. Anne Butler The Master of Science degree in Education with a concentration
More informationReading Competencies
Reading Competencies The Third Grade Reading Guarantee legislation within Senate Bill 21 requires reading competencies to be adopted by the State Board no later than January 31, 2014. Reading competencies
More informationSCHOLASTIC READING INVENTORY (SRI) - Testing Window: Aug. 28 th Sept. 28 th, 2012
INFORMATION FOR 2 nd TO 5 TH GRADE TEACHERS REGARDING DISTRICT-WIDE READING ASSESSMENT: August 20, 2012 SCHOLASTIC READING INVENTORY (SRI) - Testing Window: Aug. 28 th Sept. 28 th, 2012 Dear Second-Fifth
More informationTRAINGING GUIDE. To Log in type the web address www.readinga-z.com into your browser. This will open the Reading A-Z home page.
TRAINGING GUIDE Getting Started To Log in type the web address www.readinga-z.com into your browser. This will open the Reading A-Z home page. Click Members at top right hand corner of the screen. Type
More informationIllinois State Board of Education. Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts
Illinois State Board of Education Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts April 2015 Assessment and Accountability Illinois State Board of Education 110 North First Street Springfield, IL 62777
More informationState of Early Literacy Assessment
ESGI (K only)* DIBELS* Only Malaga Elementary Running Records (K) Fluency reads (1st/2nd) Only Marshall Elementary A Z *Categorized as Foundational Skills s as well as s EGSI Sample ESGI EGSI Begin with
More informationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Graduation Requirements for the Graduating Classes of 2014 and 2015 BUL-5186.0 DATE: February 11, 2011 Judy Elliott, Chief Academic Officer Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and
More informationSetting Individual RTI Academic Performance Goals for the Off-Level Student Using Research Norms
7 Setting Individual RTI Academic Performance Goals for the Off-Level Student Using Research Norms Students with significant academic deficits can present particular challenges as teachers attempt to match
More informationRecommended School Based Teams
Recommended School Based Teams Literacy, Math, and Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports Team Possible Members Meets PBIS Team Administrator Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports Teacher
More informationProgress Monitoring and RTI System
Progress Monitoring and RTI System What is AIMSweb? Our Reports Provide: AYP/NCLB Risk Category Reporting and rates of progress by type of instructional program or risk group include these demographics
More informationLaVergne Middle School 2014-15 S.I.P.
Rutherford County Schools LaVergne Middle School 2014-15 S.I.P. Analysis of Last Year s Final Results Areas of Greatest Progress: Proficient/Advanced IMPROVEMENTS 2013-14 LMS met 2 of the 4 AMO goals for
More informationPre-Requisites EDAM-5001 Early Literacy Guiding Principles and Language
. EDAM EDAM-5001. EARLY LITERACY: GUIDING PRINCIPLES AND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT This course is the prerequisite for all other courses in the Early Childhood Literacy program. It outlines the philosophical
More informationComprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction 2013-2014
Comprehensive Reading Plan K-12 A Supplement to the North Carolina Literacy Plan North Carolina Department of Public Instruction 2013-2014 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PAGE 3 NCDPI PAGE 4 STANDARDS-BASED
More informationPennsylvania Department of Education
Pennsylvania Department of Education Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Education 333 Market Street Harrisburg, PA 17126-0333 Professional Education Report Thursday, June 04, 2009 (Last Last ApprovedTuesday,
More informationLAKE SILVER ELEMENTARY
Page 1 of 17 Accountability, Research, and Assessment School Improvement Plan 2010-2011 School Improvement Plan LAKE SILVER ELEMENTARY Approved by: Principal: 9/27/2010 Area Superintendent: 10/19/2010
More informationDescription of Services
Description of Services ARSD24:05:28:01. Least restrictive program to be provided. Children in need of special education or special education and related services, to the maximum extent appropriate, shall
More informationTeaching All Students to Read: With Strong Intervention Outcomes
Teaching All Students to Read: Practices from Reading First Schools With Strong Intervention Outcomes Summary Document Elizabeth Crawford and Joseph Torgesen Introduction One of the most critical needs
More informationREAD 180 Aligns to Enhancing Education Through Technology Criteria (With Professional Development from Scholastic Red )
READ 180 Aligns to Enhancing Education Through Technology Criteria (With Professional Development from Scholastic Red ) According to the federal Guidance on the Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed
More informationMiddle School Special Education Progress Monitoring and Goal- Setting Procedures. Section 2: Reading {Reading- Curriculum Based Measurement (R- CBM)}
Middle School Special Education Progress Monitoring and Goal- Setting Procedures Section 1: General Guidelines A. How do I determine the areas in which goals are needed? a) Initial/Re- evaluation IEP s:
More informationTEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING
Chapter 10 TEAM PLANNING AND REPORTING TOOLS: Tool 10.1 Tool 10.2 Tool 10.3 Tool 10.4 Tool 10.5 Sample team plan. 3 pages Team planning template. 3 pages Alternative team planning template. 1 page Team
More informationCity Schools Curriculum & Instructional Supports: SY 2013-2014
City Schools & Instructional Supports: SY 2013-2014 A guide to City Schools curriculum, assessments, materials, and professional development expectations in Literacy and Mathematics for the 2013-2014 school
More informationAligning Social Emotional Learning Standards to Illinois Academic Standards Using the RTI Model
Aligning Social Emotional Learning Standards to Illinois Academic Standards Using the RTI Model Valerie M. Donnan M.Ed Special Education District of Lake County Gages Lake, Illinois Why SEL? 6% of U.S.
More informationIntensive Intervention
Fit Your Framework. No matter how you frame it, it fits. focusmath provides the essential elements of Response to Intervention (RtI) in a validated instructional design for accelerating math achievement.
More informationGrant Assistance Toolkit How to Write a Competitive Grant Featuring Scholastic s READ 180 and Scholastic Red
Grant Assistance Toolkit How to Write a Competitive Grant Featuring Scholastic s READ 180 and Scholastic Red Introduction to Grants State and federal grants are either categorized as Competitive or Formula
More informationHelp Desk: Section 1
Help Desk: Section 1 This page provides detailed guidance to Section 1 of the Pennsylvania Department of 1a. Name Educator s full name First, MI, Last Juan L. Rodríguez 1b. School Name of school(s) to
More informationqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqw ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa
qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqw ertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa ISD 85, SPRINGFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj
More informationTargeted Reading Intervention for Students in Grades K-6 Reading results. Imagine the possibilities.
Voyager Passport Targeted Reading Intervention for Students in Grades K-6 Reading results. Imagine the possibilities. You can make a diff The Reality of Illiteracy According to recent statistics, the average
More informationTalent Development Secondary Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Blueprint Practices to Support a Culture of Success
Talent Development Secondary Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Blueprint Practices to Support a Culture of Success The Blueprint: The Blueprint targets curriculum, instruction and assessment as key
More informationBilingual Education: English Language Learners Secondary Reading/LA Instruction
POINTS TO BE EARNED: 120 MPP PART I PLANNING DESCRIPTION: Write a brief description of content and intent of component. This component will enable the participants to identify processes and the techniques
More informationScholastic READ 180 Next Generation
Scholastic READ 180 Next Generation READ 180 Next Generation is a comprehensive system of curriculum, assessment, human capital development, and family engagement tools that empower everyone to contribute
More informationMlearning disability. For years schools have attempted to
A Parent s Guide to Response-to-Intervention illions of school age children experience difficulties with learning. Their struggles in school may be due to factors such as inadequate instruction, cultural
More informationRequirements EDAM-5002. WORD STUDY K-3: PRINT AWARENESS, LETTER KNOWLEDGE, PHONICS, AND HIGH FREQUENCY WORDS
LETTER OF ENDORSEMENT: TEACHER LEADERSHIP AND INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING Requirements Dr. Grace Surdovel, Director of Master's Programs/Faculty of Practice The Letter of Endorsement in Teacher Leadership and
More informationNC TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS SAMPLE EVIDENCES AND ARTIFACTS
STANDARD I: ELEMENT A: Teachers demonstrate leadership Teachers lead in their classroom Developing Has assessment data available and refers to it to understand the skills and abilities of students Accesses
More informationWriting Instructionally Appropriate IEPs
Writing Instructionally Appropriate IEPs Special Populations Tennessee Department of Education Sullivan County Teacher Training July 2014 Norms Please sit with your identified group there is a purpose.
More information888.924.7257 www.palsmarketplace.com
PALS is the essential screening, diagnostic, and progress monitoring tool for measuring the fundamental components of literacy. 888.924.7257 www.palsmarketplace.com PALS Who are we? The Phonological Awareness
More informationMTSS Implementation Components Ensuring common language and understanding
MTSS Implementation Components Ensuring common language and understanding Table of Contents about MTSS Page # Multi-tiered systems of supports defined What are the basic components of the problem-solving
More informationStronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System Overview Teacher Effectiveness Student Achievement Student Achievement Stronge Evaluation System Effectiveness is the goal. Evaluation is merely
More informationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Guidelines for the Implementation of the LAUSD Middle School Mathematics Placement Assessment for the end of Grade 6 DATE: April 10, 2015 Dr. Ruth Pérez, Deputy Superintendent of
More informationUsing Data to Develop and Assess RTI and IEP Goals
Using Data to Develop and Assess RTI and IEP Goals By Meg Palisoc CA Charter Schools Association Performance Institute September 2011 Nov./Dec. 2011 October 2011 Professional Development Opportunities
More informationTranscript: What Is Progress Monitoring?
Transcript: What Is Progress Monitoring? Slide 1: Welcome to the webinar, What Is Progress Monitoring? This is one of 11 webinars developed by the National Center on Response to Intervention (NCRTI). This
More informationty School District Digita al Classrooms Plan
Nassau Count ty School District Digita al Classrooms Plan Nassau County School Districtt Digital Classrooms Plan 1 P age The intent of the District Digital Classroom Plan (DCP) is to provide a perspective
More informationMulti-Tiered System of Supports SITE-BASED INTEVENTION AND SUPPORTS GUIDANCE For Balanced Score Card Development
Multi-Tiered System of SITE-BASED INTEVENTION AND SUPPORTS GUIDANCE For Balanced Score Card Development Site Leaders, In Fall 2012 we introduced a comprehensive, system-wide strategy to address equity
More informationSample Student Learning Objectives-Educator/Student Support Specialists
Subject Area: Intellectual Disabilities Grade(s): 6 # of students covered by SLO: 5 % of students covered by SLO: 100% of Grade 6 Student Learning Objective: My 6th grade students will improve their social
More informationThe researched-based reading intervention model that was selected for the students at
READ TO ACHIEVE GRANT APPLICATION COVER PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS NARRATIVE: PROPOSED GRANT INTERVENTION -This section can be NO MORE THAN 30 pages total. NO PAGE NUMBER NO PAGE NUMBER MAXIMUM OF 30 PAGES
More informationReading Assessment BTSD. Topic: Reading Assessment Teaching Skill: Understanding formal and informal assessment
Reading Assessment BTSD Topic: Reading Assessment Teaching Skill: Understanding formal and informal assessment Learning Outcome 1: Identify the key principles of reading assessment. Standard 3: Assessment,
More informationDecember 7, 2015. Dear Parents of Students in Grades 6-12,
December 7, 2015 Dear Parents of Students in Grades 6-12, In 2012, the Effective Grading Practices Study Group was formed to examine grading practices at the secondary level in our school district. The
More informationARIZONA State Personnel Development Grant Introduction and Need
ARIZONA State Personnel Development Grant Introduction and Need The Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education awarded a five year State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) to Arizona.
More informationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Policy Bulletin
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: Criteria for Granting Instructional Credit in Secondary Schools BUL-1100 DATE: June 28, 2004 Merle Price, Deputy Superintendent Instructional Services ROUTING Local District Superintendent
More informationWiggleWorks Aligns to Title I, Part A
WiggleWorks Aligns to Title I, Part A The purpose of Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs is to ensure that children in high-poverty schools meet challenging State academic content and student achievement
More informationINDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1141027 Test: CH 9 Acceleration Test on 09/06/2015 Grade: A Score: 92.68 % (38.00 of 41.00)
INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1141027 Grade: A Score: 92.68 % (38.00 of 41.00) INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1172998 Grade: B Score: 85.37 % (35.00 of 41.00) INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1232138 Grade: B
More informationINDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1153366 Test: CH 9 Acceleration Test on 29/07/2015 Grade: B Score: 85.37 % (35.00 of 41.00)
INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1153366 Grade: B Score: 85.37 % (35.00 of 41.00) INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1346350 Grade: I Score: 21.95 % (9.00 of 41.00) INDIVIDUAL MASTERY for: St#: 1350672 Grade: A
More informationMS Communication Arts Goals Building and District Update 2/26/2009
MS Communication Arts Goals Building and District Update 2/26/2009 CM Strategy One: The achievement level of our total student population as measured by MAP test has remained flat the last three years.
More informationUTAH S 3 Tier Model of READING INSTRUCTION
Tier 3 Tier 2 Tier 1 UTAH S 3 Tier Model of READING INSTRUCTION UTAH STATE OFFICE OF EDUCATION 250 East 500 South P.O. Box 144200 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4200 Patti Harrington, Ed.D. State Superintendent
More informationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM
LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM TITLE: NUMBER: MEM 6516.0 ISSUER: DATE: June 15, 2015 Summer 2015 Professional Develoent for Special Education Teachers of Students on the Core Curriculum
More informationLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT MEMORANDUM
TITLE: NUMBER: ISSUER: School-Site Professional Development Priorities- Banked Time Days for Elementary Schools (2015-2016) Ruth Pérez, Ph.D., Deputy Superintendent Division of Instruction Gerardo Loera,
More informationGeorgia s New Tests. Language arts assessments will demonstrate: Math assessments will demonstrate: Types of assessments
Parents Guide to New Tests in Georgia In 2010, Georgia adopted the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in English language arts and mathematics and incorporated them into the existing Georgia Performance
More informationSuccessful RtI Selection and Implementation Practices
Successful RtI Selection and Implementation Practices Dr. Lawrence D. Tihen Executive Director of Curriculum and Staff Development Maria Callis Schneider Secondary Reading Coordinator Virginia Department
More information70-1210.508C Reading Sufficiency Act - Programs of Reading Instruction
70-1210.508C Reading Sufficiency Act - Programs of Reading Instruction Kindergarten Screening and Assessments A. 1. Each student enrolled in kindergarten in a public school in this state shall be screened
More informationStructured English Immersion Models of the English Language Learner Task Force
Structured English Immersion Models of the English Language Learner Task Force Authority Effective September 1, 00, under the authority of Laws 00, Chapter, the Arizona English Language Learners (ELL)
More informationKey Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)
Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6) The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in English Language Arts and Mathematics as well as the soon-to-be released Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) require
More informationReading Case Study #1 Grade One: Decoding
Grade One: Decoding Devin Kearns Grade One: Decoding Purpose of Case Study The purpose of this case study is to highlight the integral role that progress monitoring (PM) plays throughout any Response to
More information